MIRO - Error of 2 MIRO for 1 MIGO

Dear Friends,
At the time of the creation of a MIRO document, the amount and the quantity are automatically populated on entering the PO number. Once the MIRO is done the entry is posted debiting the GR/IR account and crediting the vendor.
If I once again go to MIRO and give the PO reference, a line appears but without the amount and the quantity. Here the user is able to enter some amount and some quantity and is able to once again save the entry. Is there any way of avoiding this double entry in MIRO stage. Can we set any error message telling that since there is no MIGO, MIRO cannot be done.
regards
Venkatesh

Hi,
Pls check the vendor master data, payment transactions account view (T_code XK02).In this view, there is check box as check double invoice where in u can set for avoiding double entry in MIRO.
May it help to u.
Best regards,
Goraksh Dhikale.

Similar Messages

MIRO Error- No amount authorization for customers/vendors in company code

Hi Friends,
While creating Invoice (MIRO), when I enter amount at Header level, I faced below error.
No amount authorization for customers/vendors in company code XXX.
Message no. F5155
Please help to know how to rectify this.
Regards, RAMAN.

HI
My problem is not solved please guide me
No amount authorization for customers/vendors in company code xxxx
Message no. F5155
Diagnosis
No amount authorization for customer/vendor line items has been specified in company code xxxx for the user group to which you are assigned.
Provided that you are not explicitly assigned to a user group, the amount authorization to the group blank (" ") is valid.
Procedure
If you entered the correct company code, initiate the maintenance of tables T043 (user groups) and/or T043T (company code authorizations).
Regards
Krishna

Error in FM RV_MESSAGE_UPDATE in MIGO transaction

Hi,
I am facing the the error in FM RV_MESSAGE_UPDATE for MIGO transaction as below:
Report          SAPLMIGO
Transaction     MIGO
Error details   Class:     FPRUNX
Error Number:    102 - No job started
Status : Update was terminated
I have checked in SM13 transaction but I am not able to get the root cause for this error.
Please advice.
Ashish Dholi

Maybe it's the ADSUSER issue, check this:
http://scn.sap.com/message/8210637

Restriction for Migo if import custom miro is not done.

Dear Consultant ,
I want to put restriction over migo for import PO.
If the custom duty miro is not done , it should not allow /restrict user for migo.
Kidnly suggest user exit or badi or any other solution for the same.
Thanx
Pradeep

The only problem with these notes is that it will not validate if custom duty invoice is passed? In case freight invoice is passed it considers that also as a valid document .
As suggested in the note you can use BADI: J_1IEXGM_BADI_LINE_MODIFY in that enhancement spot ( around line 996-997) and add the validation of in EKBZ for that PO, KSCHL= " custom duty condition" and it should give error message if invoice does not exist.
This logic will work if invoice is posted for the full qty.
Other wise you can use user exit and badi as suggested by Ajit , MB_MIGO_BADI, exit mbcf0002. in that logic if custom duty invocie is posted ( check in EKBZ- kschl= " what ever you custom duty conditions are for that EBELN and EBELP). If no then throw error message.
Regards
Sangeeta

MIRO Error - Balancing field "Profit Center" in line item 001 not filled

Dear Experts,
Recently we upgraded to ECC 6.0 from 4.6C. We implemented new GL functionality.
We have also introduced new Profit Centers and have updated the same in Material Master.
Now, the new Profit Centers are valid from 01.04.2009 till 31.12.9999.
Now my problem is while doing MIRO after 31.03.2009 for old PO's i.e. the PO's which were created before 01.04.2009 the system gives me error "Balancing field "Profit Center" in line item 001 not filled".
This is because for the particular line item it picks the profit center from material master, but the validity of that (NEW) profit center is from 01.04.2009 whereas I want to do the posting in back date i.e. for eg. 28.03.2009. Due to which it does not get any profit center.
How do I resolve this problem. Is there any exit or BADI to do the same.
Regards...

Hi
There could be multiple reasons for this. Pls check on:
1. For the Expense Account assigned in DIF, have u made the assignment for deriving Profit Center & Business Area in T Code OKB9
2. Ask your FI Consultant to check the Splitting Characteristics for the MIGO. Check the Splitting Characteristics assigned to the Accounting Document Type assigned to T Code MIGO. Also check if all the GL Accounts have been assigned a splitting characteritics. The path is:
IMG> Financial Accounting(New)>General Ledger Accounting (New)>Business Transactions>Document Splitting
3. Do you maintain profit center as a default in material Master? If yes, check if the same has been assigned in the view extended for the plant concerned?
Pls check the settings. If any doubt, revert back.
Thanks & Best Regards,
rahul.

MIRO Error due to Quality Reason

Hi All,
Suppose there are 3 GRs of different date of same material. Out of which for 1st GRs quality Inspection has been done and rest 2 GRs are not. Account has received the 3 Bills from vendor for 3 GRs separatly.
when Account tries to Execute MIRO for 1st GRs for which quality Inspection has been done.
system is not allowing me to Post MIRO, Generating Error Message for quality reason.
Why system generating error while posting MIRO for quality Inspection clear for 1st GRs.
please help me...
manoj singh

Hello,
Please look into this,
If you set this indicator, the payment of the invoice is blocked with blocking reason I (I = Inspection), if you want to prevent automatic payment of the invoice from a QM standpoint.If this indicator is set, when the invoice is created, the system determines whether an inspection lot exists and if necessary, sets blocking reason I. This occurs in the following instances:
1) There is still no usage decision for the inspection lot
2) The inspection lot is rejected
The automatic payment program checks whether the blocking reason I still exists. The following scenarios can occur:
Invoice verification takes place with reference to the goods receipt.If there are several partial deliveries for an order item, the system checks for each GR item whether blocking reason I exists. This means that automatic payment of the invoice is only prevented for partial deliveries that do not fulfill requirements.
Invoice verification takes place without reference to the goods receipt.
If there are several partial deliveries for an order item, the system only checks with reference to the order item whether blocking reason I exists. This means that automatic payment of the invoice is prevented, if one or more GR items does not fulfill requirements.
The system does not automatically remove blocking reason I, if an acceptance decision is made for the inspection lot concerned. You must remove blocking reason I at invoice verification or invoice release. To do this, set the indicator Release invoices automatically when releasing invoices.
If you only want to pay invoices, when the quality management process has accepted goods or waived a goods receipt inspection, you must ensure that invoices are not entered before goods receipt. You do this by planning GR-based invoice verification for the relevant vendors.
Please revert with your feedback
Regards
Gajesh

Integration MIRO error, how to determine the VST related accounts.

integration Miro error.
Hi gurus,
please resolve the problem urgent.
while doing MIRO Iam getting the following error.
after given PO number in MIRO I getting the following error. please how to resolve the problem.
where i can determin the accounts, which accounts will be effect.
Error in account determination: table T030K key ASHA VST V0
Message no. FF709
Diagnosis
In the chart of accounts to be posted to, no accounts are defined for the tax code you used.
Procedure
Contact your system administrator.
Define the accounts to which a tax posting is to be made with the tax code entered in Customizing for taxes on sales/purchases.
To do this, choose Maintain entries (F5).
How to determine VST

I have already replied to the same question in one of ur earlier posts.
If you want to knowthe GL accounts which are used presently for the transaction VST, you can go to table T030K give the field name KTOSL value as VST and execute. YOu will get the list of all GL accounts which use the transaction VST for all possible tax codes and Chart of Accounts.

MIRO should be allowed only for the accepted Qty (QC accepted qty)

Hi Friends
I have one more requirement ,
MIRO should be allowed only for the accepted Qty (QC accepted qty) or Subcontract MIRO should be allowed only for the quantity accepted by QC
with QM control key in material master(QM view) we can block for payment,
but my query is MIRO should not be saved (message should come qty still lying in Quality inspection stock)
Please let me know the settings,
Thanks & Regards
Gajendranath

Hii,
Yes it is possible to restrict Invoice passing in MIRO if the Stock is in Quality stock / Blocked stock. The concept is while doing MIRO, u can validate the criteria by clicking simulation tab. U can get the things in BADI (Business ad in function) with the BADI object name as "Invoice_update".
The working is when the material is in quality stock & If ur doing MIRO for the same material, then system will pop up the message that "material with "X" qty is in quality stock" Invoice cannot be made. System does'nt allow u to pass the Invoice unless the stock is cleared from the quality. Even for the blocked stock we can simulate these error pop message.
with regards,
K.Lokesh.

Miro Error in account determination: table T030 key PCOA KDT

WHEN USER IS USING MIRO WITH CREDIT MEMO.HE GOT FOLLORING ERRO.
ERROR MESSAGE IS AS FOLLOWS
Error in account determination: table T030 key PCOA KDT
Message no. FF709
Diagnosis
In the chart of accounts to be posted to, no accounts are defined for the tax code you used.
Procedure
Contact your system administrator.
Define the accounts to which a tax posting is to be made with the tax code entered in Customizing
for taxes on sales/purchases.
To do this, choose Maintain entries (F5).
Miro Error in account determination: table T030 key PCOA KDT

Dear Venkat
actually we have only one currency that is INR and last month also we have posted same but no error.KDT Is not suppose to maintain as per discussion with client.
if select with out tax code its posting now.No error from that1
NOTE:And 1 more imp thing in MIRO if i select calculate tax button automatically tax amount cloum is closing. i am not able to visable
let me know any possibilities
Edited by: sumathi lakshmi on Feb 20, 2009 6:33 AM
Edited by: sumathi lakshmi on Feb 20, 2009 7:36 AM
Edited by: sumathi lakshmi on Feb 20, 2009 1:07 PM

At the time of MIRO against STO full qty for invoice is showing.

We have created STO for lumsum qty and then created OBD with PGI and GRN for breackup qty,but at the time of MIRO against STO full qty for invoice is showing ,and we want respective breakup qty in respect to OBD or GRN no. as reference.

Have you done PGI and GRN both for partial quantity ?
Can you show the screen shot for PO history and MIRO ?

Critical :MIRO TRANSACTION-POP UP SELECTION FOR MULTIPLE VENDOR SELECTION

Hi experts ,
I have a requirement in my project in which AP ( accounts payable ) requires pop up selection box in MIRO when there are multiple remit to address exist for the same vendor.Currently AP does not have the ability to see when mulitple remit accounts exist for a vendor.   This is causing payment to be sent to the wrong place.so the requirement is 1.Modify the MIRO transaction to determine if a multiple remit-to vendor scenario exists and issue an info message to the user so that he/she can perform a vendor search.
Modify MIRO to Issue Info Message for Multiple Remit-to Scenario
If possible, find an appropriate BAdi or user exit where an info message can be issued. The message must be issued after entry of the purchase order number.
Determination of a multiple remit-to case is as follows:
-     User in transaction MIRO enters a value in the purchase order number field and presses enter or other function key
-     In exit code:
o     the vendor number is determined from the purchase order entered
o     the vendor master is then searched and the following vendor records are returned as matches:
     ADBR remit-to vendors defined as partners to the purchase order vendor number
     Vendor records with the same tax ID number as the purchase order vendor number
     ADVN vendor records with the same value in LFA1-ZZMCOD2 in the first 12 characters only
     Include the vendor number defined to the purchase order number entered
o     If the search returns more than one vendor record, then issue the info message u201CMultiple remit-to vendors may exist. Please validate vendor on PO with vendor on the invoice.u201D
can anybody provide any inputs in this.
regards
Prasun

I have wondered about this for a while. I was trying something tonight and it seemed to do what you need. I suggest you save your document before trying it.
Select one of your popups.
Copy Style
Select all the popups
Paste Style
With all selected, go to the Inspector and add another item to the list.
All popups should now have the new item. The selected values should not have changed. Copy/paste style is required to make this work.
Please let me know if this works for you. I've tried it a few times and it seems to do the trick.

Migo error no conversion foun for NA to ROl

While doing migo i get an error NO conversion found for EA toROl how to resolve

Hi
In MM02, maintain alternate unit of measure fr this material from EA to ROI
Regards
Ajay M

Error during Goods Receipt for Production Order

Hi All,
When using MIGO to post Goods Receipt for a Production Order, I got a customize message saying that the posting is only available between 2010.08.25 to 2010.08.27. I have checked in Business Add-in using SE19 but there are no implementation present. I know that in Logistic Verification MIRO there is a transaction OMRM to set messages. I would like to ask is there anything similar for MIGO.
Or is there any other place in Configuration which allows me to add these Customize message.
Thanks.
Edited by: jamison2004 jordan2004 on Jul 9, 2010 9:09 AM

Hello Jiaul,
Sorry I may have mislead you. The actual error message is "Goods Receipt for Production Order XXXX can only be made on 2010.08.25 to 2010.08.27". These two dates are the Start Date and FInish Date for the Production Order in CO03,
The Basic Start Date for the current Production Order is 2010.08.25
The Basic Finish Date for the current Production Order is 2010.08.27
I think what it means is that you can only Post Goods Receipt for the Production Order only after the Basic Start Date of the Production Order. Do you know where I can find the configuration for this message?
Thanks

BDC for MIGO & J1IEX

Hi,
For Goods reciept for Kanban material there is transaction called PKBC. Inside this transaction we wrote two BDC's i.e One for MIGO (with only Part1) & J1iex(Capturing & posting the excise invoice). After running this we found that accounting document contains all the entries including Part2. But During MIRO we are not getting excise amount which is payable to the vendor.
Please help me to resolve this. Incase if you need any clarification please ket me know.
Thanks in advance
Regards,
Krishna A S V

why r u using two BDC
why dont u use only one and update Part I and Part II at a time
regards,
snb

Regarding output types for MIGO

Hi all,
please tell me what is the application type and output type for MIGO and MIRO in NACE.
Thanks,
kishore.

dear friend,
For MIGO E1 INBOND DELIVERY , and output type is the INDL .
pls go to this rewards are helpfull.
vivek srivastava

MIRO - Error of 2 MIRO for 1 MIGO

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for