MIRO  Tax Issues

Dear Friends,
we have created PO for HSD for IOCL
Basic Price  -   100
Exice duty  -   10
Add E.Duty  -   1
Cess  -            2
Primary Frieght - 10
CST   -         3   (Calculated on  BP, ED, Add ED, Cess and Fright)
total Po Value  -  126.00
while doing MIRO 
PO Value showing  -   116.00
Fright  -         10
however  our account dept saying  CST will be separate shown in MIRO.  how it solved.    if we use condition CST in Invoice TAB   then  PO Amount will be show wrong amount ( it not include fright amount).
so kindly advice
Regards
Rajesh G

Mr. Dewang
we have used  CST at Item Level.   PO  is fine..    but  issue is   at MIRO.   while doing MIRO    material value showing except frieght value.
also  CST  which calculated on Frieght not showing in Fright amount.
if i maintain CST condition in Invoice Tab in PO..  it not calculating on Fright Amount etc.. then PO amount will be incorrect.
thanks
Rajesh G

Similar Messages

  • I have one mm tax issue

    Hi sap Gurus, I have one issue,
            my client have 2 company codes As well as one chart of accounts ,user tried to post MIRO ,taxes amount  didn't appeared in one company code balances.So any settings company code level  in mm belongs tax settings,pls help me immeadtitaly.b'coz this issue high severity issue.
    thanks & regards
    Sri

    Hi,
    I cannot help you with the problem of the access sequence, but I have a question for you in regards to the definition of EU and none-EU countries. Have your customer defined combinations for all different countries within/outside of EU, or have you one combination for EU/EU, EU/None-EU, etc. In that case how have you solved that not having to defined all combinations?
    Thanks,
    Emma

  • Tax issue in US - very urgent. !!

    Dear All,
    Someone from SAP told me that :
    "In US localisation the tax is depending
    only on the delivery and good receipt location.The tax code will apply for all the item depending on the Business partner ship to address in case of a delivery and on the location of warehouse in case of goods
    receipt"
    However, when i ask the end user from US, he told me that in one invoice, there are items which have GST, while other items on that invoice have PST + GST. Under this situation, the tax setting cannot be "generic" based on the ship-to-address. So, could anyone share with me:
    1, How to deal with this tax issue on one invoice?
    2, what's the general practice in US in the tax area?
    Million thanks

    Have a look at this thread:
    /thread/117232 [original link is broken]

  • Tax amount in MIRO Tax tab

    Hi All,
    What is the significance of the field Tax document currency in MIRO Tax tab. Here whatever tax amount is displayed is not matching with the actual tax amount. Please exlain me the significance of this field.
    Thanks in Advance
    Pavan

    Hi Malyadri,
    I have not posted part 2 entries. What I am observing is that vat amount is calculated on base amount and hence there is difference.
    Now, I doubt that I have not posted the Part 2 and hence this is the difference.
    Please if any body has faced this same scenario please tell me.
    Thanks and Regards
    Pavan

  • MIRO, tax code

    Hi ..
    I have maintained Tax Code in Infor record
    This got copied to PO as expected
    when i go to MIRO, system by-default bringing diff tax code at header, i had to manually change to the tax entered in PO
    I could see in line item in MIRO tax code is properly brought-in from PO
    if default tax code is removed in go in spro == mm== liv== incoming invoice == Maintain Default Values for Tax Codes then will get blank entery in miro
    1. So there is no way that we get tax code of line item to header as well ?
    2. how the system will work below case
    Header - 2% tax
    Item1 : 100 USD - 1% tax
    item2 : 200 USD - 1% tax
    Please clarify above 2 questions, Thanks

    1. So there is no way that we get tax code of line item to header as well ?
    Ans. In the basic data header level in MIRO no, but at the tax tab yes, at the header level both the tax codes will get copied with required details and after selecting calcuate tax the tax will get calculated.
    2. how the system will work below case
    Header - 2% tax
    Item1 : 100 USD - 1% tax
    item2 : 200 USD - 1% tax
    Ans In the tax tab of MIRO tcode both the item level tax code will get copied once you enter the line items tax code which will get copied from PO.
    MIRO header Tax tab:
    100.00     Base amount      Tax code details
    200.00     Base amount      Tax code details
    BR
    Edited by: Sujoy on Feb 9, 2010 2:50 PM

  • BC Major Tax Issue - Retail, Wholesale, Manual orders

    Hello,
    I'm hoping someone might be able to shed some light on a tax issue with BC as I'm really loosing faith with Business Catalyst over this issue!!!
    We sell retail, wholesale and do manual orders.
    We sell retail where the price needs to be including tax.
    We sell Wholesale where the price needs to be excluding tax.
    As there is no tag that will show retail price including tax and wholesale price excluding tax we were told to use {tag_totalprice} on the products page to show pricing.
    To get our website to work we were told to install {tag_shippingoptions,true,,} on the shopping cart.
    We were told to have tax on retail products as GST
    We were then told to make tax Not applicable on wholesale products so that the tax wouldn't be included in the price but assigned with the {tag_shippingoptions,true,,}  on the shopping cart.
    This was all working fine until a wholesale customer rang to change their order and do another order.
    if you change a manual wholesale order then it REMOVES the tax!
    if a wholesale customer rings up to do an order and we can't see their password - we need to do it as a manual order as we can't login as them. Hence again no tax.
    Really dissapointed in BC over this - does anyone have any solutions?
    Would love any help

  • MIRO tax line item Issue

    Dear All,
    When I post a MIRO having more than one line item, I am not able to find a material in the Material field in BSEG table for my MIRO Accounting document.
    Note that I am using 4.7 version & for tax item entry's since the material is not captured in the std. BSEG table I am unable to get how much is the Sales/Service tax Payed against each item/Material.
    Kindly suggest Is this anything to do with my SAP version??
    or Is there anyway to make my material appear in the std. BSEG table??
    Regards,

    Hi,
    Do anyone have an idea on this Issue?
    Plz help.
    Regards,

  • Tax Issue in MIRO

    Hello SAP Scholars,
    When I try to post an invoice in MIRO, some amount is hitting BSX (stock account).
    Tax code I1 (4%) has been given in PO so logically there should be 3 accounts:
    1) Reconciliation account
    2) GR/IR account
    3) Tax account
    but when I am simulating I am getting 4 accounts and the fourth account is this BSX (stock account) so can you provide me solution , I just wanted to know from where this stock account is coming into picture?
    Than

    Hi -
    It could be the case where the price of the material on the PO is lesser/higher than that of the standard price. If that is the case, then the price difference (Purchase Price Variance) goes into another account, in this case the BSX Stock account.
    Let me know if it works.
    Best -
    SR
    Edited by: rstitan on Mar 21, 2011 9:54 AM
    Edited by: rstitan on Mar 21, 2011 10:00 AM

  • PO tax setup MIRO payment issue

    We have the following scenario: PO set up with no tax. GR/IR posts correctly. But when doing MIRO and adding tax, selecting the calculate tax button, it posts it back to a write off account rather than posting directly to the original expense account.
    Where can I see/change config to fix this? Please help.

    HI,
    i think the tax you are speaking is regarding the Tax code ?
    if so then there is a setting for defaulting Nil tax code for the invoice document
    it is done in spro
    SPROMMLIVINcomming invoices>Maintain default values for tax code
    the above is done at company code level.
    so for you comapny code make the default tax code as NIl tax code. then you will not have any tax caliculated.
    hope so it helps
    Regards
    Anjanna

  • F_53 Withholding tax Issue(not india)

    Hi,
    While processing the payment through t-code f-53, isystem is not calculating tax according to tax code assigned i-e XX. It should deduct tax Rs. 406 but deducting Rs. 6015. This is the only error I have found while processing the payment of the vendors.
    and  what is mean by per year,starting with mnth in withholding type config in accumulation type tab?
    Regards
    Venki

    HI ALL,
    Please look Issue detail below,(its not Indian TDS)
    PO gross value is 11600(as per WHT settings  its cal gross value)
    MOGO and MIRO have done correctly, when at the time of payment entry is:
    Invoice gross value= 11500
    WHT code per        =3.5%
    Vendor a/c  A/c Dr   11600
                  To bank a/c                 11194
                  To Tds                          406
    its not coming above values. its has given wrong value:
              Vendor a/c     11500
                          TO  bank a/c    5485
                          TO TDS  a/c    6015
    Please help this
    Regards,
    Venkat
    Edited by: KVenki on Dec 8, 2011 9:26 AM

  • MIRO Tax Error NAFF707 Tax does not equal 0 when tax % rate is Zero

    Hello Sap Guru's-
    New issue with MIRO today for all our invoices with tax.  We have been live with ECC 6.0 and something has changed preventing my users from posting invoices. 
    When the user adds tax and an item to undisclosed amount for freight, etc, typically the user goes and post.  SAP is not allowing this to happen as we receive the following error:
    Error Message NA FF707
    Tax entered incorrect (code I1, amount 6.86) correct 0.00
    The system checks the tax amounts for each code on document level.  However, the amounts entered deviate more from the amount calculated (using the percentage rates defined in the tax code) than is alloweed considering rounding errors.
    This message is an error message, and the error is telling me to correct the tax amounts or the base amounts, depending on how your tax code is defined.
    We are on Vertex.
    When I look at the PO, the lines for tax are zero.
    Is this a Vertex problem? 
    I appreciate your help!

    figured it out

  • Income tax issue for mid month joinees

    Issue 2:
    For New (mid month) joinee at the first month gross salary is calculated based on the earned salary amount *12 months (or no. of remaining months for financial yr end), but in my client income tax deducted based on the actual salary (not earned salary) from the first month onwards.
    For example :
    Employee X,
    Joined date 15.08.2011,
    Actual salary = 1,00,000 INR.  Earned salary for 15 days = 50,000 INR.
    While Start Payroll for the period 5th (August) 2011. The WT /416 Gross salary = 4,00,000 (50000*8). Based on this gross salary income tax calculated, But I want to calculated the gross at first month (august 2011) based on follows,
    Gross salary : August month earned salary = 50,000 + Actual salary per month =1,00,000*7 =7,00,000.
    Gross salary = 7,50,000 INR.
    Please give me some solution
    Thanks and regards
    Mohan .V

    Hi Param Dayal,
    New issues rise Now....
    For New (mid month) joinee at the first month Exemption U/S 10 is calculated based on the Conveyance Allowance amount *12 months (or no. of remaining months for financial yr end), but in my client income tax Exemption U/S 10 based on the actual salary (not earned salary) from the first month onwards.
    For example :
    Employee X,
    Joined date 15.08.2011,
    Conveyance Allowance = 800 INR. Earned Conveyance Allowance for 15 days = 400 INR.
    While Start Payroll for the period 5th (August) 2011. The WT /130 Exemption U/S 10 = 3,200 (400*8). Based on this Conveyance Allowance The Exemption U/S 10 calculated, But I want to calculated the Exemption U/S 10 at first month (august 2011) based on follows,
    August month earned Conveyance Allowance = 400 INR + Actual Conveyance Allowance per month =800*7 =5,600.
    Exemption U/S 10 = 6,000 INR.
    Please give me some solution
    Thanks and regards
    Mohan .V
    Edited by: mohantamilan on Sep 26, 2011 2:52 PM

  • Calculation of Tax Issue from FB60 (Tax Code Issue)

    Dear All,
    Normally when we purchase or received any services we post following entry.
    INVOICE VALUE IS 1000
    Purchase Ac Dr   1000
       To Vendor                   900
       T o Tax                         100
    But our requirement is that
    Purchase Ac Dr   1100
       To Vendor                  1000
       T o Tax                          100
    System should add cost of TAX  in purchase instead of reduction form vendor balance as we have to give 1000 RS to vendor.
    Can we create TAX code in this manner.
    This is not even possible form function available in Edit Option in FB60 (Calculate tax on Net Amount)
    Not even from TDS (Withholding tax)
    WE CANu2019T SUGGEST POSTING JV IN THAT CASE.
    Regards,
    Bittu

    Apologized for that Atif.
    Withholding Tax Type does not control Vendor line item.
    My issue is that system should not reduce value enter in vendor  amount field.
    System usually reduce amount which is payable to vendor
    Please see my example once again. I also mention that it is not working from Withholding Tax nor form Tax code(FTXP)
    Edit option in FB60 is also not useful in this case.
    Regards,

  • /616 WT & Income tax issue

    Dear all,
    I face a serious problem: some PFs have income tax = 0 (their salary is taxable) while others are double.
    I checked PC_PAYRESULT and saw that error come from WT /616:
    At period 01.2011, in section 89, some wage types are calculated wrong
    In-Year for Payroll --- --- --- ---  For-Year for Payroll --- --- --- - Wage type- --- --- -- Amount
    2011--- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- - 2010- --- --- -- -
    --- --- --- -  /6I2- --- --- ---  ---    29,377.00-
    2011--- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- -   2010- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- -  /616- --- --- --- ---  365,713.00-
    2011--- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- -   2010- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- -  /650- --- --- --- ---   5,973.00-
    I don't know why they come with a huge amount like this , but it causes wrong taxes and many problems for payroll in year 2011.
    I checked many topics, but still can't resolve.
    Add. gross salary in RT Table.
    /616 Add gross salary Issue
    Please help.
    1. Why were these WT calculated with a huge Rs?
    2. How can I fix this (Payroll already has ran for 5 months ago)

    Hi,
    the error is in which system.(PRD/QLY)
    according to the first thread you have gone through check the control record dates and change it to 2010 xx period and try once.
    if it is not giving any error then you can easily capture the solution why is it calculating so .
    change the control record dates to 2010 and try..
    or check the IT-0008 records are there any salary changes in past(salary Increased)
    we have model wage types
    M89G--/616
    M89I--/6I2
    M89T--/650  copy using this model wage types and balance the amount by giving in IT-0015 (deduction amount) and try...
    hope this helps you 
    let us know the result...
    Regards,
    mohammed

  • Professional Tax issue for Maharastra Employees in case of Separation

    Please provide your inputs on below Professional Tax requirements.
    An employee separated on the month of Feb 2014.His total gorss earnings is includes claim.
    Basic                               |     39,833.34
    Allow (Flexi)                    |        400.00
    Superannuation Allow     |      5,975.00
    Claim                               |    201,666.00
    Balance Flexi Pay           |     75,016.67
    The employee also having some Negative arrears in the same month (FEB 2014) as Lop data is maintained for the month of Dec.2013, Jan 2013.
    And below is arrear amount.
    Basic Arrears                       39,833.33-
    Allow (Flexi) Arr                         400.00-
    Superannuation Allow Arr |      5,975.00-
    Balance Flexi Pay Arrear  |     75,016.67-
    However system is now generating Professional Tax while running payroll for Feb 2014 & my client is telling that Professional Tax should not be deducted as Gross salary is 0 for Feb 2014. The employee below belongs to Maharashtra P tax circle.
    Please let me know what should we do in such case..
    Reagrds,
    SAP HCM Professional

    Professional Tax is not based on Earnings
    Professional Tax will deduct every month No matter , An employee salary is Zero
    Check backend Configuration There is deduction Carry Farward Change the configuration You would able to resolve your issue.

Maybe you are looking for