Missing camera calibration profile for supported camera

I am relatively new to Lightroom. I have imported Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200 raw (.RW2) files into Lightroom 5.3. When I go into the Develop module under the Camera Calibration the only profile that shows up is Adobe Standard. My camera is supported according to the Adobe web site. What gives?

Bob, like the above post mentioned, I am also fairly new to Lightroom and still learning a lot of how things are suppose to work. I'm sure my problem is similar to the above post but can you please clarify this for me one more time. In my case...
I use a PC running Windows 7.
I'm running Lightroom 4.4.1, Camera Raw 7.4
I import photos from a Pentax K20D camera.
In the "Develop" module under "Camera Calibration" I only see 4 profiles which are "embedded," "ACR 4.4," "Adobe Standard" and "Camera Standard."
Is everything correct? Am I suppose to see a camera profile for my Pentax Camera? If so, how do I properly install a camera profile for my Pentax K20D camera?
I followed the path C:\ProgramData\Adobe\CameraRaw\CameraProfiles and I found the "Adobe Standard" folder and in there where tons of camera profiles. I also found the camera folder and it had also different camera model folders in there including my Pentax K20D, however nothing shows up in Lightroom itself under camera calibration.
Can you please clarify how all this works? Thanks!

Similar Messages

Camera Calibration profiles for Leica M 240

Hi Forum
I'm using LR to process DNG files from Leica M 240.
I understand LR has some extra profiles ( "Camera Faithful, Camera Portrait, etc" ) for some Canon and Nikon camera models.
As under "Camera Calibration -> Profile" I can only see "Embedded" or "Adobe Standard", does it mean these extra profiles don't exist for Leica M 240 ?
Thank you all for any clarification.

Embedded is what you will always see on JPEG images. Adobe standard is the one you will see on your raw images. If you want additional profiles you will have to download the DNG profile creator and make your own. If Adobe standard is all you have then that is all Adobe is providing for your camera.

Which Camera Calibration Profile for Leica M8 with LR3?

I see there are 4 camera profiles for the Leica M8 that all produce significantly different results - ACR3.6 and 4.4 and Adobe Standard and Camera Standard. Any advice on which to use and when?
Thanks in advance.

ACR 3.6 (this is the Adobe standard profile) when support was first introduced.
ACR 4.4 (with this version of ACR) Adobe created an updated standard profile.
Adobe standard, this is the latest profile introduced during ACR 5.x, just a new naming method
Camera standard, this is a profile created by Adobe to simulate the profile by the M8 to produce in camera jpegs.
Use the one that pleases you most, as a starting point then create your own presets to make further adjustments.

Camera Calibration Profile for Leica D-Lux Typ 109

I have Lightroom 5.7 with Camera Raw 8.7, both supposedly the latest versions, and yet I do not see any choices other than Adobe Standard under the Camera Calibration Profile menu. I have the newly supported Leica D-Lux Typ 109, and was expecting to see some camera specific choices in the Profile menu. Am I mistaken?

Most cameras only have an Adobe Standard profile:
492 camera models have Adobe Standard profile.
166 camera models have profiles in addition to Adobe Standard, mostly Canon, Nikon, Olympus and Sony.
The only Leica model that has more than an Adobe Standard profile is the M8.

I'm missing lens correction profiles for Olympus lenses ?

Where can i find any lens correction profiles for Olympus lenses?

Hi,
LR3.3 is released today, and it has support for Olympus E-5 added to it. Details of it can be found here;
http://blogs.adobe.com/lightroomjournal/2010/12/lightroom-3-3-and-camera-raw-6-3-now-avail able.html
and the new version of LR3.3 can be downloaded here;
http://www.adobe.com/products/photoshop/cameraraw.html

Where should I save the camera calibration profile for Lightroom 2?

I created some DNG Camera Profiles by DNG Profile Editor. For Camera Calibration in Camera Raw, I save those .dcp files in C:\ Administrator\ Documents and Settings\ Application Data\ Adobe\ Camera Raw \ CameraProfiles. However, I could't find such a subfolder in Lightroom folder, does any one know where should I save the dcp files for Lightroom 2? Thank you

It's the same install folder for both Camera Raw and Lightroom (i.e., a .dcp installed in the folder you described will be readable by both CR and LR).
Eric

Camera calibration profiles doesn't read by LR above v4.2

Hello!
I have some custom camera calibration profiles for my camera installed in /Library/Application Support/Adobe/CameraRaw/CameraProfiles/Camera/Camera-name
Everything works fine in LR 4.0-4.2 but this profiles missing in 4.3 and above. Placing profiles into LR.app/Contents/*/*/* didnt help too.
So what is wrong with LR?
4.2
4.3-4.4

Which location are you speaking of?
MacHardDrive /Library/Application Support/Adobe/CameraRaw/CameraProfiles/Camera/Camera-name
or
Users/User Name//Library/Application Support/Adobe/CameraRaw/CameraProfiles/Camera/Camera-name
As a test, if you copy one of the missing profiles to the other location does it then show up?

Need Better Profiles for HP B9180

Hi all,
Like others, I find that my HP Photosmart Pro B9180 produces prints that are 20-30% darker than the image on my calibrated monitor. I am running CS3 on my Mac OSX Leopard system. I am trying to print on HP's Advanced Photo Glossy paper.
My color settings are along the lines of those recommended by Scott Kelby (Adobe RGB workspace and prolife; and I allow PS CS3 manage colors and not the printer).
I've experimented with other printer profiles provided by HP, but nothing delivers a good print. Has anyone found a good ICC profile that will work with this printer/paper combination?
Thanks, in advance, for any help you can offer.
Best,
Tracy S.

Ok, you caught the typo. I actually went back to his book to find the proper page citation to support my statement, until I realized you were having a bit of fun. Just so the record is clear, I have no knowledge as to whether Mr. Kelby is or is not prolife.
Anyway, on to your advice....
"You need to calibrate and profile your particular monitor, then use the resulting profile as your MONITOR PROFILE. (DEVICE DEPENDENT.)"
Did that, as I mentioned in my original post.
"Finally, your target profile has to be a specifically calibrated profile for the particular combination of paper, ink and printer. (DEVICE DEPENDENT)."
Yes, that is the essence of my message in which I am asking for assistance in locating a better ICC profile for my printer (HP B9180) and paper (HP Advanced Photo Glossy) combination. The stock ICC profile from HP is generating poor results. Short of printing off target sheets and sending out for a customized profile, I thought I would see if anyone else has tumbled to a better profile. Others have encountered a similar color and tonal shift in their prints using the same set up as me, so someone may be able to point me in the right direction.
Also, I did review the site to which you directed me. As Mr. Ballard points out:
"The problems users have with Photoshop, and color managed applications are:
1) They break the Color Management System CMS, by attempting to turn it off -- when in fact they can't!
See: Turn Color Management on And Honor my Embedded Profile, Please gballard.net
2) They have bad profiles...."
My problem is precisely the one he identifies as point (2) -- I have a bad output device profile and I wish to correct that.
Anyone out there with a good HP B9180/Advanced Photo Glossy ICC profile out there??
TS

Creation of profile for CO28

Hi,
We needto create the profile for display of components with some particular fields for CO28 transaction.
I am aware of COIS transaction in SPRO to do that. There is also the transaction OPLM linked for creation of profiles.
Can anyone tell me the exact way and step by step rpocedure for creating a new profile with required fields.
Proper expalantory answer will receive good points.
Rg,
Vipul

Hi Vipul,
Go to SPRO-shop floor ctrl-information system-define profile for order info system.
Here u will find all the objects with the profiles attached for each objects under the Standard profile.
These profiles are used in reporting transactions like
Profile for order info system - COOIS, CO28
profile for picking list - CO27
profile for missing part info system - CO24
Folllowing profiles are assigned to ordertype dependent parameters at plant level - OPL8, Here under display you have to assign these profile in "Display Profile" tab.
profile for missing parts list
profile for documented goods movement
Hope this has answered your query. Reward your points
Regards
R.Brahmankar

Lens Profile for Nikon Nikkor AF-S 18-35mm 1:3.5-4.5 G ED

Hi,
I'am missing the Lens Profile for the above Lens from Nikon. The Lens is build since January 2013 and I hoped that the new Lightroom 5 includes a Profile für this lens.
Does anybody know when Adobe will update Lightroom with this Profile? Or does anybody has build his own Lens Profile?
Best regards
Winfried

According to the Adobe Lens Profile Downloader:

LG L246WHX calibration profile?

Hi all,
does anybody has a calibration profile for LG L246WHX 24" monitor?
Thanks!

I have the LG L246WHX and have been using the standard profile provided with OS X (10.5 in my case). I have also not yet adjusted the monitor's default settings.
If anyone does have an example monitor setup and calibration profile, it would be appreciated.

Missing Camera Calibration Profiles in Lightroom Creative Cloud

I am missing the ADOBE SUPPLIED Nikon D700 and Olympus OM-D E-M5 camera calibration profiles in Lightroom. They were there until I had to reload the apps from CC. I looked in the forums already and haven't found any answer. I have tried to get support from Adobe through Chat and the person there had no clue what I was asking.
I found this answer on a similar question but it does not explain why the Adobe-supplied profiles are missing. To be clear, I am not talking about custom profiles.
"If you are asking about Adobe-supplied profiles, they will be installed every time you update the software so there’s no need to copy them, anywhere, and the reason for not seeing them would be that the current photo is not a raw file since most profiles are only for raw not jpg."
Can anyone help me out? Thank you.

There is no uninstaller. Just drag the app to the trash and reinstall it from the CC app. That should fix your issue. If you want to know, on Mac OS X and starting with LR 4, the profiles are installed in the app wrapper inside the Applications folder for some reason so they are hard to find. you control click on the app, select "Show package contents" and navigate to Resources > Camera Profiles

Missing camera calibration profiles (Nikon P7700)

Until recently I've been able to apply a choice of camera calibration profiles (e.g. Camera Landscape, Camera Portrait etc.) in the Develop Module to images taken with my Nikon Coolpix P7700. However, these have now vanished, and I'm only left with the option of Adobe Standard. When I view photos that I previously applied the missing presets to, I see the old preset (e.g. Camera Landscape) briefly in the Camera Calibration Profile setting in the Develop Module, but then it changes to Adobe Standard.
I think what caused this change was an upgrade to OS X 10.5.8. I haven't changed LR recently, and have been using LR 4.4. It's currently using Camera Raw 7.4; I haven't updated Camera Raw separately, although it may have been updated by OS X? I've tried upgrading to LR5.2 to see if this will fix the problem, but it doesn't.
There are no profiles for the P7700 in Application Support/Adobe/CameraRaw/CameraProfiles/Camera/ in either ~/Library/ or /Macintosh HD/Library/.
This is very weird and annoying behaviour: LR is changing the camera calibration profiles of all my images, but without warning me!
Does anyone know how I can reinstall these profiles? I've searched extensively for an answer to this, but with no luck.
Any help or suggestions would be greatly appreciated.
Many thanks.

Thanks for that Geoff.
Apologies: I did mean upgrading the OS to 10.8.5, not 10.5.8! I wasn't sure whether ACR was affected by OS X upgrades. And I am viewing RAW files.
If LR has ACR built in, do you know whether it uses the files at Application Support/Adobe/CameraRaw/CameraProfiles/Camera/ or does it get the profiles from elsewhere? Something's changed the profiles LR reads on my computer, but if it's not OS X, and since it wasn't an LR upgrade that triggered the change, then I'm stumped as to what's caused this!
If LR does use profiles at the directory above, then presumably installing new profiles there (in ~/Library/) will override the built-in ACR files?
Thanks for your help.

Camera calibration profile. i dont get the option to chose landscape

Bought myself a Fujifilm Xs1 and like with my Canon i prefer to take shots in RAW.
Now the thing is in editing in lightroom i am not get the landscape option in camera calibration >profile just Adobe Standard as if i took the shot in jpeg
any ideas ?

This is Quoted from the Lightroom Journal where the official word comes from Adobe for new functions. It was posted when LR 5.4 was released.
""Added Camera Matching color profiles (PROVIA/STANDARD, Velvia/VIVID, ASTIA/SOFT, MONOCHROME, etc.) for the following Fujifilm cameras:
Fujifilm X-A1
Fujifilm X-E1
Fujifilm X-E2
Fujifilm X-M1
Fujifilm X-S1
Fujifilm X-T1
Fujifilm X-Pro1
Fujifilm X10
Fujifilm X20
Fujifilm XF1
Fujifilm XQ1
Fujifilm X100
Fujifilm X100S
New Lens Profile Support in Lightroom 5.4""
I think it may be worth the try to install the trial of LR 5.4 and see if the profiles become available for use with LR 4.4
Just a thought out of the box not sure if it will work.
Lightroom does not provide additional profiles for all cameras they support, most of the camera models supported only have their own "Adobe Standard" profile.

Raw 3.1 professional custom profiles for highend digital cameras

I have a few questions for thomas knoll:
I would like to start with a statement here:
WHY ??? ....all this messy color calibration with slider inside the raw 3.1 plugin , when it could be so easy and simple :
what you can find already inside high end digital back software like sinar's capture shop or the leaf capture software, is nothing more and nothing less than a plugin called profilemaker , written by greatg mac beth. the leader in this field nowadays.
a software ,which again against license fees, is being implemented in those softwares.
what does it exactly do?...you might ask....
well, here a very simplified explanation :
for ex., you start your shoot with a shot of greatg color chart (24 patch or the big one), and that very" licensed" plugin called profilemaker will calculate a 100% precise and accurate color correction in the form of a custom icc-profile for you.
in just a few seconds.
so that that red from the chart that you took a picture of, is going to be that very same red in the final file in photoshop.
it puts something like a correction curve over your original raw file, so that it matches that very color from chart you just shot.
such colors is a game of numbers and formulas, and certainly not a slider function to fumble around with, where one person will say this red is correct, and another says no, this red is the right one.
something like profilemaker is incredibly accurate , because its pure mathematics, and not a form of lottery...!!!with an infinit number of possibilities when one would use sliders like in raw 3.1..
sliders that fighteach other, especially the ones in the calibrate tab section.
it takes a few second for a profilemaker software to make an 100% acurate custom color correction , in the form of a custom icc profile for your shot / and or digital camera.
if you have ever experienced this shortcut and these amazingly beautiful rich colors you can achieve with such a software, you will NEVER EVER go back.
I am not sure why adobe has not come up yet with their "own" version of such a profilemaker portion inside raw plugin 3.x.
they certainly have the know how to do this.
i would dare to state here, that it probably would take them only a few days to implement such a feature.
or , why adobe is not implementing an optional upgrade with "gretags" profilemaker , inside their raw plugin.
I certainly can count hundreds , probably thousands of photographers, who would be more than happy to pay for this feature. even if the license fees would be above 300$ for such an upgrade.
dear thomas knoll,
why have you not yet done so.....>>???
I hope that very, very soon you will consider such a suggestion.
in the meantime ..............i cross fingers......
very sincerely,
akos simon
akos photography

I have done many DlogH curves, and at one point, owned the Zakia /Todd book. No, the toe does not change much with increased development, but it does change. And yes the changes beyond middle gray (Zone 5; 18% gray)are greater than below, but again, it does change. Film speed does change as a function of development, and film speed is based (variously over the years) on just how the film comes out of the toe, it is inescapable that the curves pivot about the toe, roughly speaking, that is. The curves not only pivot there, the toe can increase in F+F value thereby showing a vertical displacement on the plot. If you take individual plots of a particular film over differing development changes, and overlay the curves such that the toes merge (roughly!), you will see that the slope of the curve does rise from the toe. I have lots of graphs in storage if you would like to see them.
I am familiar with AA's procedures. I studied and used them from about 1961. One of the reasons I ran so many curves is that I was interested in the so called compensating development, such as water bath, special formulas etc. I ran the curves on Plus-X, Tri-X, Tri-X professional, Panatomic-X, and other emulsions whose names I have forgotten. What I found out is that Plus-X didn't respond to compensating development at all. I could lay the reference curve over the DUT and they would match exactly. Quite a shock. I remember a film rated at ASA 250 that responded admirably, but way too grainy, even in 4x5.
I used two methods. One was to contact print a step tablet, the other was to shoot the tablet using an old diffusion head as a light source. I could tell how much support in the shadows I was getting from flare that way. Oh, and the one way that always worked was pre-exposure, sometimes post exposure. I could lift the toe nicely that way.
Plus-X had the straightest middle section of all. Ruler straight. Tri-X had a significantly different toe than Tri-X Professional.
Every meter measures luminance and can allow you to measure the scene dynamic range. A one percent spotmeter becomes an averaging meter for extreme telephotos, just as there is no such thing as a panoramic camera with a fixed lens. It's just cropping for the panorama, and whether a handheld meter is averaging or spot depends on the relative focal length of the taking lens.
The idea that a hand held averaging meter cannot give you the dynamic range of a scene is nonsense. Have you ever read "The Negative", first edition of AA? He explains how to use a meter to obtain dynamic range, if you cannot do that, you cannot even begin to use the zone system. He even described using a tube set into the meter element to do a rudimentary spot meter. I had several Weston Masters which had this homemade accessory. it was pretty neat, but boy, did it rob you of sensitivity!
Look, a metering system is simply some sort of light sensitive material which provides a change in some electrical parameter for a corresponding change in the light level. On it's own, you would simply see a needle move across the face plate. Putting numbers on the face plate corresponding to some light unit (Lux, Ft. Candles, Candles/ft^2, etc) allows you to quantify the responses. What you ultimately do with these numbers is one of the biggest parts of sensitometry as applied to photography. As you say, that application to digital is different than to film, but only because the demands of the digital medium requires it. I could just as easily build an exposure system for film based specifically on highlight placement. Film chose a different route, and, so far as I can tell, the optimum route. If digital and film had developed concurrently, perhaps we would reconcile the two systems so as to avoid the condition we find ourselves, at least those of us raised on film. The new guys, well, they will probably chortle over the Dodge/Burn application. They will have no appreciation for negatives. It took a while in the darkroom with the counterintuitive nature of dodge/burn when I started up.
I am enjoying this exchange, Jeff. It clears the air, and reminds me that in order to most easily grasp the digital concepts, I am better off with my engineering hat than the photographer's hat. I'm in my late 60's and it's too easy to slip into old patterns. Changing hats works well, and I am glad I can do it.
Cheers, and goodnight! (my,oh my! It's 1:17AM here!)

Missing camera calibration profile for supported camera

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for