Monitoring inbound processing and Sync/ Async communication on PI7.11

Hi All,
I am new to PI. We have following two requirements to be done on PI 7.11
1)     Monitoring inbound processing (Txn Code SWF_INB_MON)
2)     Monitoring Sync/ Async communication (Txn Code SXMS_SAMON)
Kindly let me know how should I proceed or what document should I follow or any scenario is to be configured.

Hi,
    1. Start inbound processing monitoring with transaction SWF_INB_MON or SWF_INB_ADM.
           Note that you require administrator authorization for transaction SWF_INB_ADM
    2. You can monitor the throughput of the inbound processing either on the basis of individual process system or system-wide. In this way you can display the throughput figures in any discrete time range, right down to seconds. A similar display for message packages allows you to monitor inbound processing with the same detail." 
     3. You can display runtime information about individual messages, for example, the total runtime of a message in inbound processing or just the runtime of a specific section of the inbound processing. For monitoring individual messages click on "Display Message Packages".
regards,
ganesh.

Similar Messages

  • Sync-Async communication

    Hi!
    Is it possible to have a sync-async communication like this:
    receive - open s/a bridge
    send (async idoc with acknowledgement in return)
    send - close s/a bridge?
    or do I have to use a receive step after the send step in the middle?
    I am trying to get a confirmation of Idoc posted to application and send this back to calling application, but I get a timeout error after the send (async idoc with acknowledgement) step...
    Thanks!
    regards Marianne

    Hi
    Thanks for you answer. I trust you here, but I have seen someone using this approach here on sdn.
    Is it not possible to have the send step wait for acknowledgement and if ack is received then send a message back to the synchronous process. And also have a timeout exception that sends back a fault if acknowledgement is not received?
    I know that some have been able to return to sync process wether the Idoc was posted correct or not...
    regards Marianne

  • Sync/Async communication in JMS adapter without BPM

    Hi,
    as of SP19 XI's JMS adapter offers this new feature for Sync/Async communication through JMS Adapter modules instead of using a BPE.
    Now I would be interested to know if anybody has already successfully used this feature especially using WebSphere MQ as a JMS Provider (preferredly in the mode JMS Compliant: WebSphere MQ (non-JMS)).
    I experienced some issues with the XI Message ID being used as the JMS Correlation ID which is then mapped to the MQ Correlation ID being truncated after 24 characters. So I don't exactly know whether this is due to wrong setup or some general issues with this messaging system.
    Please let me know if you have any experiences at all with this new feature (please do not just post links to the following blogs, which I have thoroughly studied as well as the How-to Guide concerning this topic)
    /people/venkataramanan.parameswaran/blog/2007/01/18/syncasync-communication-in-jms-adapter-without-bpm-sp19
    /people/sudheer.babu2/blog/2007/01/18/asyncsync-communication-using-jms-adapter-without-bpm-sp-19
    thanks & regards,
    Peter

    Hi Peter,
    we working on the same Problem. Using IBM Websphere MQ as JMS Provider for the new feature: sync/async bridge without BPE.
    we switched on a high level trace for the adapter framework and saw a problem in the receiving Object of the JMS correlation id. The notify bean receives the JMS correlationid in hex format. so the beans have two different correlations, which could not find together.
    did you have any solution to get this new feature works with IBM Websphere ?
    thanks
    joachim

  • Sync/Async communication in JMS

    HI all,
    i configured scenario as mentioned in the blog
    "Sync/Async communication in JMS adapter without BPM (SP19)
    Venkataramanan Parameswaran".
    now i am working on PI 7.0
    but i am getting the error as fallows.....
    <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
    - <!--  Call Adapter
      -->
    - <SAP:Error xmlns:SAP="http://sap.com/xi/XI/Message/30" xmlns:SOAP="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/"
    SOAP:mustUnderstand="1">
      <SAP:Category>XIAdapterFramework</SAP:Category>
      <SAP:Code area="MESSAGE">GENERAL</SAP:Code>
      <SAP:P1 />
      <SAP:P2 />
      <SAP:P3 />
      <SAP:P4 />
      <SAP:AdditionalText>com.sap.aii.af.ra.ms.api.DeliveryException: Object not found in lookup of
    RequestOnewayBean.</SAP:AdditionalText>
      <SAP:ApplicationFaultMessage namespace="" />
      <SAP:Stack />
      <SAP:Retry>M</SAP:Retry>
      </SAP:Error>
    can anybody tell me why it is?
    Thanks,
    Kumar

    Please refer these links
    Sync/Async scenarios without BPM
    Async/Sync Communication using JMS adapter without BPM (SP 19)
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw70/helpdata/en/45/20d1dec20a0732e10000000a155369/frameset.htm

  • What is IDOC Inbound process and Outbound Process?

    What is IDOC Inbound process and Outbound Process?
    can any one explain about the inbound and outbound process step by step?
    Tks in advance,
    Phanikumar

    Hi,
       Inbound means transfer legacy data to SAP system and
      outbound means transfer SAP system data to legacy system.
    Regards,
    Prashant

  • Sync/Async communication with JMS Receiver

    Hi all,
    I am working on one Sync/Async model without BPM. Sender is  RFC which is expecting some response, but we know receiver jms doesnt support response message directly. For this i used modules provided by SAP.
    While developing interface i used below objects.
    One Outbound Synchronous interface--> for Sender RFC channel
    Inbound Synchronous Interface----->for Receiver JMS Channel
    outbound asynchronous interface--->for Sender JMS channel
    one request mapping and one response mapping
    Operational mapping between outbound Synchronous to inbound synchronous.
    ID Objects:
    2 sender agreements: one with sender jms channel
                                         one with sender rfc channel
    1 receiver agreement: with jms receiver channel
    1 receiver determination
    1 interface determination
    In receiver jms and sender jms channels i used modules as specified in the document http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/EN/45/20d2b4c20a0732e10000000a155369/content.htm
    But my interface is not working end to end successfully.
    Please confirm below points
    1)do i need to have other external application put response message to response queue or will the MQ automatically generates the response message and put into response queue
    2)In receiver jms channel is it ok if i will put response queue(Q2) name in the field JMS ReplyTo Queue Name or do i need to put in the form queue://<ReplyToQMgr>/<ReplyToQ>
    3). what is the format of data type for asynchronous outbound interface which i used for sender agreement of jms sender channel.
    4). Do i need to do any other special settings at MQ settings in MQ server.
    Note: i am using PI7.1 and i selected the option JMS-compliant for target client in jms channels.
    Thanks,
    Madhu
    Edited by: Madhusudana Reddy on Nov 4, 2009 9:38 AM

    1)do i need to have other external application put response message to response queue or will the MQ automatically generates the response message and put into response queue
    The following information is available in SAP note-
    Message correlation implies correlating a response message with a request message. With respect to the JMS adapter, this means that you sent have sent a message through a JMS receiver channel to some JMS queue (say queueA) , some external application processes this message and puts the response onto another JMS queue(say queueB) which is then picked up by a JMS sender channel. You need to relate this response message with the original request message.
    In the simple case, for all JMS compliant providers this can be done in a straightforward manner:
    a) In the JMS receiver channel configuration, set the JMSCorrelationID to the XIMessageID. (or some other XI header which is applicable)
    b) Ensure that your external application does not change the value of the JMSCorrelation
    c) In the JMS sender channel configuration, set the XIConversationID to the JMSCorrelationID
    d) The XIConversationID header of the response XI message now contains the XIMessageID of the request XI message.
    For some providers such as Websphere MQ in legacy/native mode this is not so straightforward.
    Do i need to do any other special settings at MQ settings in MQ server.
    If your using Websphere MQ, refer que#4 in sap note :1086303
    Edited by: nagarjuna _s on Nov 4, 2009 11:02 AM

  • Integration Process with Sync / Async-Bridge in BPE

    Hello,
    I try to configure the following process for the BPE:
    - synchronous send a request message from RFC (ok)
    - asynchronous send the request message over HTTP-Plain (ok)
    - map the request message to response in BPE (ok)
    - synchronous send the response message back to the RFC (ok)
    The problem is:
    I need a different mapping from request to response which is depending from the result of asynchronous sending (like positive or negative response).
    Is it possible that I get the control about the result of sending in my process configuration?
    Thanks for help
    André

    More information, In the jms adapter the following error appears:
    XI inbound processing failed for message at time 2007-06-11|11:12:48.908+0100. JMS and XI identifiers for the message are ID:414d512052545849444556312020202045f55b6c20d73102 and 4e5bff20-1804-11dc-c2b4-00096b6ed15c respectively. The JMS adapter will rollback the database and JMS session transactions. If the session is transacted, the message is not lost and will be retried later. The exception stack trace is java.lang.Exception: Minimum address data not configured. Field InterfaceNamespace is empty.
         at com.sap.aii.af.service.jms.WorkerJMSReceiver.onMessage(WorkerJMSReceiver.java:1516)
         at com.ibm.mq.jms.MQMessageConsumer.receiveAsyncQ(MQMessageConsumer.java:2538)
         at com.ibm.mq.jms.MQMessageConsumer.receiveAsync(MQMessageConsumer.java:4260)

  • [HELP] ALE inbound process and Workflow handling problem

    Hello,
    first of all, i have to apologize about my english level. I will try to explain my problem (thanks for your patience ).
    Well, I'm implementing an ALE inbound interface. My development at this point are:
    - Customer Idoc Inbound function (with correct interface).
    - Customer Basic Type
    - Customer Message Type and correct assignment to the Basic Type (Tx WE81 and WE82)
    - Customer Object Type (Subtype of IDOCAPPL)
    - On BD51 I put "1" for my function.
    - On WE57 I put this:
    Processing by --> My function and type "F"
    IDOC type --> My Basic type (without any extension)
    Message --> My message type (without any message code or msg. function)
    Object --> My object type (subtype of IDOCAPPL)
    Direction --> "2" (Inbound)
    - I created a process code for this interface (on WE42):
    It is processed with ALE service and by a function module (my function).
    On "Module(Inboud)" part I put my function and maximun number of repeats "0". On IDOC part I put my Object type with start event "INPUTERROROCURRED" and end event "INPUTFINISHED".
    On application objet I put my Object type.
    Rests of fields are blank.
    - I defined a partner (WE20) with this new message type and process code.
    - Also I created a Task (PFTC) for handle exceptions in inbound process. It has a rule for agent determinate.
    I think it is all.
    My problem is: when I process an IDOC (from WE19 for example) and it gets 51 status (error), it has to launch an event that trigger my task, is this way? Well I'm not getting any event.
    I have all Workflow customizations OK (in this systems are running some Workflows).
    In my function code, when I detect any error I put an error in the status table and put in WORKFLOW_RESULT the number '99999'.
    Why I'm not getting any event? What I'm doing wrong?
    Thanks in advance. Regards.

    Hello again,
    finally I've solved the problem. The solution for me, was a config on tx. WE42 and some missing code in the function, I only fill WORKFLOW_RESULT with '9999', but I didn't add any register to RETURN_VARIABLES table.
    Regards.

  • IDOC Inbound Processing and updating DN

    Hi,
    I'm unfamiliar to inbound processing (i just understand the basics). I've dealt with outbound processing and user exits associated with that.
    I have a specific client requirement: an Inbound IDOC is to be processed and update a delivery note. Some field of some segment within this inbound idoc will carry some information which I need to extract and update a field  in the Delivery Note with. How could I do this?
    Inbound message type is DESADV. Does my requirement need user exit programming or can I set up some kind of a batch job process?
    Thanks in advance,
    Risad

    HI,
    For processing inbound idoc one process code attached in the partner profile. From this process code you can find out the function module attached to it.
    Inside function module use can check for exit or badi to modify DN or write your custom logic. If you already have the test data you can check it from we19. Here you need to select standard inbound.
    Thanks
    Subhankar

  • How to monitor / shutdown processes and users?

    Hi,
    As you can see in my previous post i'm totally new to Arch and fairly new to Linux...
    Here's one thing that bothers me: I don't know how to keep track of all running processes (and end them if needed... I guess you need to 'kill' them but you first need to know their name, right...) and logged on users (even though that's only me, heh...)
    How can you do that in Linux? (something like task manager or another admin tool - or a command line version)
    Another thing... I think a wiki page 'securing the default Arch install' would be helpful...
    (flame me if there already is one, but I didn't find it )
    greetings,
    d.
    (I think Arch is going to be the one Linux distro to break the record of 1 month installation on my pc... woohoo!!!)

    Kern wrote:
    processes man ps
    Now only 2 questions are left: how to monitor logins, and how to secure Arch Wink
    Arch Wink, is this a subrelease of Arch? if so i've never heard of it. 
    I really don't know how that ended up in my post especially because I use semicolon, bracket instead of colon, wink, colon for my smiley...
    but as relates to securing Arch, of course I mean against network based attacks. The way you would try to secure Windows. I know how to own windows computers when I have physical access to them, and I guess it's the same thing with Linux pc's... but I want to feel secure that nobody from the internet is going to appropriate my box for illegal or other things, on those few occasions that i'm not behind a router/firewall (which I am not sure I trust either... it's a Linksys wireless/wired router with integrated firewall capability. How secure is that? I don't know!)
    Is there no way to deny all other pc's access to this pc? It's a laptop, not a server, so nobody has business accessing it remotely anyway... Actually, this is one of the reasons I had an eye on openBSD secure as hell...
    EDIT: since we're at it... another thing I don't find is how I can find out at what speed my cpu is running... is it going down to 600 MHz when Idle or isn't it? etc... That stuff is pretty easy to see in windows... must be feasible at least in Linux hey

  • IDOC Inbound processing and Locks

    Hi there,
    we are trying to process an incoming idoc. But all the time we get an error: Immediately processing not possible: EDI: IDOC "XYZ" is currently locked.
    There is an lock entry for this IDOC in table EDIDC. We get this error while calling the FM IDOC_STATUS_WRITE_TO_DATABASE with status 52 (application doucument not fully posted).
    What can we do?

    Exactly why are you trying to write the IDoc status to the database? 
    It sounds like you have written a custom IDoc.  If this is so, you would pass the IDoc status back in table IDOC_STATUS, and it will get updated automatically by SAP. 
    When SAP extracts the IDoc data, it places an Enqueue lock on the IDOC.  That is why you are getting the error message.
    HTH,
    John

  • Sync-Async process

    Hi Friends,<br>
    I am in a problem, I have one jpd published as a webservice to a poral [synchronous] client. This jpd is asynchronous,meaning it have separate client request and client response node, but the same jpd is calling one more process control[async again] to do the dirty work of tranforming incoming request and then sending to legacy system using JMS control[async activity]. The question is, can we call the outer jpd [that is published as a web-service] synchronously from a portal page. I seen the weblogic docs they say to make sync-async wsdl file and define client callback method,I tried it but it doesn't work.<br>
    I think my design fall in some limitation that the doc is talking about as in between pair of client request and client response node I have another client request to the process control [for transforming and sendng receiving message].<br>
    <b>Is there anyother way to make it work?<br>
    Did anyone got the same problem before?<br>
    Guys, you need to help me in this pls
    I already tried lots of permutation and combination to arrive at this design so pls don't ask me to change this now. :(<br>
    Cheers,<br>
    Shailesh <br>

    Just to let you know that I have gotten sync-async WSDL to work.
    In my situation we front an async JPD with a JWS via this sync/async WSDL. We had to do this since we had a requirement that only allows soap over http AND sync/async WSDL needs soap over jms protocol.
    Can you clarify when you say "it does not work"?
    There is a test project out there somewhere in dev2dev codeshare or samples area that demonstrated this procedure. The first time I tried this approach I missed one step where I forgot to add the following line in mine process definition block:
    * @jws:protocol jms-soap="true"
    Hope this helps.
    Parvez

  • BPM correlation and Sync-Asyn Bridge....

    Regarding Sync-Asyn ,I have gone thru these blogs...
    Demonstrating Use of Synchronous-Asynchronous Bridge to Integrate Synchronous and Asynchronous systems using ccBPM in SAP Xi - Use of Synch - Asynch bridge in ccBPM
    https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/weblogs?blog=/pub/wlg/1403 [original link is broken] [original link is broken] [original link is broken] - Use of Synch - Asynch bridge in ccBPM
    I am not able to do a end to end scenario...using this ....So could any one give me a step by step guide for the syn-asyn Bridge.
    And also step by step for correlation...
    Please help me in this regard....

    Hi,
    Defining Sync/Async Communication
    To enable the communication between a synchronously calling business system (synchronous outbound interface) and an asynchronously called business system (asynchronous inbound and outbound interface), you can define a sync/async bridge in an integration process. You can only define one sync/async bridge for each integration process.
    You can also achieve sync/async communication by using the JMS adapter. If you do not have any particular demand for monitoring or for troubleshooting, SAP recommends that you use sync/async communication in the JMS adapter instead. The advantage of using the JMS adapter over synch/async communication using an integration process is a significant increase in system performance.
    See: Async/Sync and Sync/Async Bridge in JMS Adapter
    Structure of a Sync/Async Bridge
    The following table outlines the minimum components of a sync/async bridge:
    Step
    Use
    Receive step to open the sync/async bridge
    Receives the message request from the synchronously calling business system and opens the sync/async bridge
    Asynchronous send step
    Sends the received message asynchronously to the asynchronously called business system
    Receive step
    Receives the message from the asynchronously called business system
    Send step to close the sync/async bridge
    Sends, for example, the response from the asynchronously called business system to the synchronously calling business system
    Performance Considerations
    If you insert additional steps in the sync/async bridge, the synchronous time is increased correspondingly. If the time that elapses before the sync/async bridge is closed is too long, this can lead to problems.
    Fault Messages
    It is currently not possible to send fault messages back to the synchronously calling business system. If you want to return error statuses to the synchronously calling business system, you can define a field for an error indicator in the message that is sent to the synchronous interface.
    Procedure
    Define a Receive Step to Open the Sync/Async Bridge
           1.      Insert the receive step to open the sync/async bridge in the integration process.
    You can do this at the following points:
    ○       Directly after the start marker
    ○       As the first step in a block if the block is the first step of the integration process and if it has the mode Standard
    ○       As the first step in a fork. If the fork already contains some starting receive steps, the Start Process indicator is automatically reset for these steps.
           2.      In the object area, define the container element that receives the synchronously sent message.
    Specify an asynchronous, abstract interface in the container element. The message must correspond to the request message of the synchronous interface used to receive the message.
           3.      Select this container element in the Message field in the properties area of the receive step.
           4.      In the Mode field, select Open S/A Bridge.
           5.      Select the Start Process field.
    The receive step to open the sync/async bridge must start the integration process. There must be no other receive steps to start the integration process.
           6.      Specify the synchronous interface for receiving the message from the synchronously calling business system. The message type of the message to be received and the request message from the synchronous interface must be identical.
    Define an Asynchronous Send Step
           7.      Insert a send step that sends the received message asynchronously to the asynchronously called business system.
    See also: Sending Messages from Integration Processes Asynchronously
    Define a Receive Step
           8.      Insert a receive step that receives the message from the asynchronously called business system.
    Define a Send Step to Close the Sync/Async Bridge
           9.      Insert the send step at the required position in the process definition.
    Do not insert the send step in a loop, block, or fork.
       10.      In the Mode field, select Close S/A Bridge.
    The integration process must not contain any further send steps to close a sync/async bridge.
       11.      In the Opened By field, specify the receive step that opened the sync/async bridge.
       12.      In the message field, specify the message that is sent to the synchronous interface.
    This message must be of the same type as the response message from the synchronous interface that you specified in the opening receive step.
    Example
    You can find an example of a sync/async bridge in the Integration Repository under SAP Basis à SAP Basis 6.40, namespace http://sap.com/xi/XI/System/Patterns under BpmPatternSyncAsyncBridge.
    For a description of the example, see Example: Sync/Async Communication.
    Reg,
    suresh

  • Need help with scenario BPM Http-RFC Sync/async bridge

    hi all!
    i've got the following scenario: HTTP-BPM(XI)-RFC synchronous both of them. for that, i'm using S/A bridge in the BPM, but i'm getting the error 'Timeout condition of pipeline reached'. i think the problem is that the process gets lost in the sync/async communication, because in the trace level shows CL_XMS_PLSRV_CALL_BPE-ENTER_PLSRV" and after that every message are 'wait time starting'.
    don't know the reason of the error. Maybe I missed something to configure?
    the BPM is like this:
    Receiver(Open Sync/Async bridge) -> Transformation (mapping from http request to RFC request) -> SyncSend (RFC request and response) -> Transformation (mapping from rfc response to http response) -> Send (Close S/A Bridge)
    the IR is configured like this:
    Message Types u2013 External Definitions u2013 Imported Objects
    mt_cxml_request -> contains xsd of xcml request template.
    mt_cxml_response -> contains xsd of xcml response template.
    zintegracion_pedidos -> imported RFC from R/3
    zintegracion_pedidos.response -> imported RFC from R/3
    Message Interfaces
    mi_cxml_request_async_abs
    mi_cxml_request_sync_abs
    mi_cxml_request_sync_out
    mi_xcml_response_async
    mi_rfc_request_asyn_abs
    mi_rfc_request_sync_abs
    mi_rfc_request_sync_in
    mi_rfc_response_async_abs
    Message Mappings
    mm_cxml_request_to_rfc_request -> mapping from http request (cxml) to rfc request.
    mm_rfc_response_to_cxml_response -> mapping from rfc response to http response (cxml).
    Interface Mappings
    im_cxml_request_async_abs_to_rfc_request_async_abs
    im_rfc_response_async_abs_to_cxml_response_async_abs
    and the ID is configured like this:
    Business system DES -> created business system for RFC adapter with interface mi_rfc_request_sync_in as receiver. Comunication channel u2018RFC Receiveru2019
    Businnes service VW -> created businnes service for HTTP adapter with interface mi_cxml_request_sync_out as sender. Comunication channel u2018HTTP Senderu2019
    Receiver Determination
    two receiver determinations. One for BPM and the other one for RFC(R/3):
    |VW| mi_cxml_request_sync_out:
    |BPM_PO| mi_rfc_request_sync_abs:
    Interface Determination
    two interface determinations:
    |VW| mi_cxml_request_sync_out | | BPM_PO:
    |BPM_PO| mi_rfc_request_sync_abs | * | * :
    Sender Agreement
    VW
    mi_cxml_request_sync_out
    Receiver Agreement
    |BPM_PO| |DES| mi_rfc_request_sync_in

    hi all,
    i've removed the transformations from the BPM, and i've created:
    in IR:
    - interface mapping: im_xcml_request_to_rfc_request_sync_abs
                                    source interface: mi_cxml_request-sync_abs
                                    target interface: mi_rfc_request_sync_abs
    in ID:
    - receiver determination: |VW| mi_cxml_request_sync_abs
                                      sender service: VW
                                      interface: mi_cxml_request_sync_abs
                                      receiver: DES
                                      interface mapping:im_xcml_request_to_rfc_request_sync_abs
    - interface determination: |VW| mi_cxml_erquest_sync_abs ||
                                         sender service: VW
                                         interface: mi_cxml_request_sync_abs
                                         inbound interface: mi_rfc_request_sync_abs
                                         interface mapping: im_xcml_request_to_rfc_request_sync_abs
    - receiver agreement: |VW| |DES| mi_rfc_request_sync_abs
                                   sender service: VW
                                   receiver service: DES
                                   receiver interface: mi_rfc_request_sync_abs
    not sure these are the steps i had to do for mapping xml to rfc. but the result is the same error as before, the timeout.
    i couldn't test with RTW because i'm getting an error 401 unauthorized.
    i'd do it without BPM but the issue is that i wanted to add another step that would be to send the response from rfc to mail too once i got this BPM running. i mean, the response from RFC would be sent to http response and mail both.
    the only way i can imagine to do it is with BPM but i'm really fed up with it.
    thank u very much folks

  • Sync-Async Gotchaa

    Hi Friends,<br>
    I am in a problem, I have one jpd published as a webservice to a poral [synchronous] client. This jpd is asynchronous,meaning it have separate client request and client response node, but the same jpd is calling one more process control[async again] to do the dirty work of tranforming incoming request and then sending to legacy system using JMS control[async activity]. The question is, can we call the outer jpd [that is published as a web-service] synchronously from a portal page. I seen the weblogic docs they say to make sync-async wsdl file and define client callback method,I tried it but it doesn't work.<br>I think my design fall in some limitation that the doc is talking about as in between pair of client request and client response node I have another client request to the process control [for transforming and sendng receiving message].<br>
         <b>Is there anyother way to make it work?<br>
         Did anyone got the same problem before?<br>
         Guys, you need to help me in this pls<br>I already tried lots of permutation and combination to arrive at this design so pls don't ask me to change this now. :(<br>
    Cheers,<br>
    Shailesh

    Hi Rohini,
    Sync/async communication enables a synchronous sender system to communicate with a receiver system that cannot process synchronous messages.
    The central component of sync/async communication is the sync/async bridge, which enables the Integration Server to receive synchronous messages from a sender and send them to a receiver as asynchronous messages. Conversely, it can send the asynchronous response from the receiver back to the sender as a synchronous response.
    To do this, you define an integration process, which is started as soon as a synchronous message is received from the sender system. The process uses a special receive step to open the sync/async bridge, sends the received message to the receiver system asynchronously, and waits for the asynchronous response to arrive from the receiver.
    The Business Process Engine receives the asynchronous response from the receiver, correlates it with the corresponding query, and activates the waiting process, which then sends the response back to the sender synchronously.
    There is an example of the Sync/Async Bridge in th SWCV: SAP BASIS.
    Namespace: http://sap.com/xi/XI/System/Patterns
    Go through this link to get a good idea as to how to <a href="http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/43/65d4dab39b0398e10000000a1553f6/frameset.htm">Define Sync/Async Communication</a>
    This blog also should give you some idea...
    https://www.sdn.sap.com/sdn/weblogs.sdn?blog=/pub/wlg/1403 [original link is broken]
    Also go through these links:
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/83/d2a84028c9e469e10000000a1550b0/frameset.htm
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/c4/dc06418752ef6fe10000000a1550b0/frameset.htm
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/f9/66bf40ad090366e10000000a1550b0/RN_XI_DE_neu.pdf
    I hope it helps.
    Regards,
    Abhy
    Message was edited by: Abhy Thomas

Maybe you are looking for

  • IPhoto 9.4.3 crashes on open

    I have tried to open using command-option and it still crashes.  I have tried rebuilding the library file using iPhoto Library Manger.  Still crashes.  I downloaded an earlier version of the library from Time Machine, and it still crashes.  I even tr

  • How to convert jpeg image  into vector

    I have jpeg  image which contains line and circle. i want  to convert this image as a vector  and  i need to export  into DXF file format. In my illustrator i am not able to find live Trace option. how to enable live trace option. can anyone  help me

  • Filevault and Launch Services

    I am having the same problem that so many people reported with Mac OS 10.5: every time I log out, the Launch Services plist is erased. I shouldn't say "every time" since I can't be sure, but it just happened the last three times I logged out. I use F

  • How start your projects? (and maintain the original format)

    Hi! This is my question, exist a "better way" for start a good and clean project in Indesign? For example, a common case: -The writer send me a word file -I use command PLACE for import the word file - I maintain the format (cursives, bolds, etc.) -I

  • When i integrate Mac client to the domain open directory, he don't ask me account DirAdmin, Why ?

    When i integrate Mac client to the domain open directory, he don't ask me account DirAdmin, Why ? I don't want all people can integrate mac client to the open directoy without authentification I want he ask me account diradmin for integrate client ma