More than 1000 values

Dear All,
I am using oracle 10g with odp.net. I have values more than 1000 to be passed in the IN condition. How do i achieve this. When i pass the values it says only 1000 parameters are allowed in the IN condition.
Please let me know.
Regards
Fkhan

fkhan wrote:
What i have thought of is to insert all the selected values in a global temporary table and then in my procedure use the subquery and use the values from the global temporary table.A better approach than using a massive IN list of values. But still problematic ito having a user interface deal with a 1000+ item/code selection. Still a performance problem shipping that amount of data across the network every single time from every single client running this app. And still a flawed ito data modelling and 3NF.
The correct approach would be permanent tables to deal with this. In its basic and simplest form:
// defines a keyword for a 1000+ items/codes
KEYWORDS = ( keyword_id, keyword_description )
// associates a keyword id with an item/code id
KEYWORD_MAP = ( keyword_id, code_id )The user interface displays the keyword description. The select clause uses the keyword_id to select from the KEYWORD_MAP the associated list of values as filter criteria for the main query (using a join or IN sub-select for example).
If the keyword is more complex than this basic approach (e.g. partially dynamic and specific per user), then this basic approach can be extended to serve as a "+favourites per user+" list (kind of like bookmarks, but per individual user). Or designed as to cater for the business requirements.
But as you have (very simplistic I realise) describe the problem so far, I do not see a problem as much as a basic flaw in your code and data model.
A user interface for entering and selecting 1000+ codes is clunky. And slow. Sending that data across to Oracle is slow. Inserting that each time around into a temp table for use, is slow.
There's a lot of moving parts here. And that always contributes in degrading performance and making stuff complex (and usually unnecessarily so).

Similar Messages

IN operator with more than 1000 values

Hi,
For a given list of IDs (PKs), I need to fetch the corresponding rows.
The problem is that I have more than 1000 values and as far as I know that IN operator is limited to 1000
values.
I thought about using UNION such that each Select contains up to 1000 IDs.
example":
select * from temp where id in(1....1000)
union all
select * from temp where id in(1001....2000)
Is there a better way to do that?
Thanks
dyahav

As others have presented technical solutions, i'll present you a logical one (seemingly logical anyways, but it will depend on your application).
I have seen some applications where you get
select * from some_table where ... <conditions>;That result set is returned to the front end and presented to the users who then pick a series of records and submit another request to the database which ends up being...
--note, this could be a many table join, with lots more information that just the some_table, this is illustrative only
select * from some_table where pk_value in (super_super_duper_list_based_on_last_result_set);If this mimics what you have in your application, i'd recommend just fixing it so the users can select a reasonable set of data, OR the entire set (in the last case you'd just send the <conditions> instead of a massive list of PK values).
Again, highly speculative but i thought i'd mention it in the off chance it's useful to you.

SQL select query having more than 1000 values in 'IN' clause of predicate.

Hi,
We are executing a select query from a table and showing it through a front end screen. When the count of values given in the 'IN' clause of predicate are exceeding 1000 , it is throwing error.
eg. select * from Employees where emp.Id. in('111',123','121','3232',........1001 Ids)
We are using Oracle version 10.2.0.
Please suggest how to tackle such issue.
Regards,
Naveen Kumar.C.
Edited by: Naveen Kumar C on Aug 30, 2008 10:01 PM

Use a nested table:
create or replace type numbertype
as object
(nr number(20,10) )
create or replace type number_table
as table of numbertype
create or replace procedure tableselect
( p_numbers in number_table
, p_ref_result out sys_refcursor)
is
begin
open p_ref_result for
     select *
{noformat}     from   employees
     ,        (select /*+ cardinality(tab 10) */ tab.nr
               from   table(p_numbers) tab) tbnrs
     where id = tbnrs.nr;
end;
/{noformat}
Using nested tables will reduce the amount of parsing because the sql statement uses binded variables! The cardinality hint causes Oracle to use the index on employees.id.

How to put more than 1000 values into an Oracle IN clause

Is there any way to get around the Oracle 10g limitation of 1000 items in a static IN clause? I have a comma delimited list of many of IDs that I want to use in an IN clause, Most of the times values may exceed 5000. And I don't have privileges to create a temporary table, so that I can put all those in that and run at a time.
Thanks
Sreenivas

Although the trick of using OR would likely work, why don't you use a dynamic collection on the right-hand-side of the where in clause?
This thread has details Re: Binding collection to right-hand-side of WHERE num_col in (:1) clause?
Binding a VArray is not super easy, but at least with a bind value (the collection), you can have a single prepared statement, and vary just the collection you pass in. --DD

Update the authorization object value for more than 1000 role

I need to remove one of the activity value (06) from authorization object S_SCD0.
I do a search and found out that there are more than 1000 roles which having the activity value = 06 for authorization object S_SCD0.
However, I don't think I can create a SCAT script to update all these 1000 roles and I believe its going to be a very tedious if I am going to manually change it one-by-one. Hence, I am wondering is there any standard program/function which I can use to automate the above changes for all these 1000 over roles.
Kindly advise.
Thanks

Direct update the table is the easiest way, but should be discourage for the obvious reason.
Should take a step back, take a long term view, when you need to update 1000 roles, maybe a role redesign might be needed. For example, if you can change the role model to derive role model, once update to the parent role will take care of all the child role.
Thanks,
Lye

How can i get more than 1000 items in Custom List Displaying Items?

http://.....sites/_vti_bin/listdata.svc/AddressBook(List) allows 1000 items Only my AddressBook List, but i have more than 1000 items in my AddressBook list. I want to get items
from AddressBook list and bind in another place using Autocomplete method like this.
=======>>>>listurl=http://.....sites/_vti_bin/listdata.svc/AddressBook.
and my coding in camel like below
protected void btnpopulatedetails_Click(object sender, EventArgs e)
SPSite objSite = SPContext.Current.Site;
SPWeb objWeb = objSite.OpenWeb();
objWeb.AllowUnsafeUpdates = true;
SPList list = objWeb.Lists["Address Book"];
SPQuery query = new SPQuery();
query.QueryThrottleMode = SPQueryThrottleOption.Override;
query.Query = "<Where><Eq><FieldRef Name='Title'/><Value Type='Text'>" + txtcustomer.Value + "</Value></Eq></Where>";
query.RowLimit = 500;
SPListItemCollection items = list.GetItems(query);
function fnCustomerSearchBind() {
if ($("input[id$='txtcustomer']").length != 0) {
var collcustomer = searchCustomers('', urlTo, fieldto);
$("input[id$='txtcustomer']").autocomplete({
source: collcustomer,
//maxLength:10,
select: function (event, ui) {
//debugger;
event.preventDefault();
$("input[id$='txtcustomer']").val(ui.item.value);
$("input[id$='btnpopulatedetails']").click();
return false;
minLength: 0,
function searchCustomers(value, listurl, fieldto) {
var collcus = new Array();
var custresults;
var url =listurl + "?$filter=startswith('" + fieldto + "','" + value + "')";
//debugger;
$.ajax({
cache: true,
type: "GET",
async:false,
dataType: "json",
url: url,
success: function (data) {
custresults = data.d.results;
//alert(listurl);
// alert(data.d.results);
for (var x = 0; x < custresults.length; x++) {
//alert(custresults[x]['To']);
collcustList.push(custresults[x]['To']);
//debugger;
//debugger;
return collcustList;
In my research listurl=http://.....sites/_vti_bin/listdata.svc/AddressBook has 1000 items in 1st Page by default, So how to change 1st Page by default to All Pages through
code. I think you understand my environment by look above coding, if you don't I am using office 365 sandbox solution. One more thing i know through my research Pages can be change by using Ado.Net Data Service, i tried this one but this one support windows
server 2008 r2 only but i am using Windows Server 2012 r2. Please help me if you know the answer.

Hi,
Here is a blog would be helpful:
ADO.NET Data Services returns 1000 items
https://gilleslauwers.wordpress.com/2010/12/08/ado-net-data-services-returns-1000-items/
Best Regards,
Dennis Guo
TechNet Community Support
Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help, and unmark the answers if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Support, contact
[email protected]

Create table more than 1000 colum

Hello
I have 1500+ column in my select query. how to create table like my query is
create table xyz nologging as
select a1,a2,a3,a4,a5,b1,b2,b3,b4,b5,................a1500
from abcd a,bcde b
where a.a1=b.b1
In oracle 10g I can create only 1000 column in a table.
Please suggest

799301 wrote:
My all columns are formulated with different different tables and want to create one intermediate table
below query is just example
select count(unique((case when sysdate >45 then video=Y and audio=N then 1 else 0 end))) vd_45,
count(unique((case when sysdate >105 then video=Y and audio=N then 1 else 0 end))) vd_105,
count(unique((case when sysdate >195 then video=Y and audio=N then 1 else 0 end))) vd_195,
count(unique((case when sysdate >380 then video=Y and audio=N then 1 else 0 end))) vd_380,
count(unique((case when sysdate >45 then video=N and audio=Y then 1 else 0 end))) ad_45,
count(unique((case when sysdate >105 then video=N and audio=Y then 1 else 0 end))) ad_105,
count(unique((case when sysdate >195 then video=N and audio=Y then 1 else 0 end))) ad_195,
count(unique((case when sysdate >380 then video=N and audio=Y then 1 else 0 end))) ad_380
from abcd a,bcde b
where a.a1=b.b1;
please suggest how create more than 1000 table columnBy creating a proper relation between the "formulated function" and stored value.
Simplistically put:
Do you model invoices as entities INVOICES_2010, INVOICES_2011 and so on?
Or do you model it as INVOICES that has a year (date) attribute?
It does not make sense to put attribute data into the name of entity. Nor does it make sense to put relationship data into the name of an attribute and create a 1000+ attributes as a result.

ORA-24335 - cannot support more than 1000 columns - How to solve this?

Hi,
I got error message 'ORA-24335 - cannot support more than 1000 columns ' when i try to insert x no of rows for a table with following code:
INSERT ALL
INTO tableA Values ('A', 'B', 'C', 1, 2, 3)
INTO tableA Values ('D', 'E', 'F', 4, 5, 6)
INTO tableA Values ('G', 'H', 'I', 7, 8, 9)
SELECT *
FROM DUAL
How to solve above?
What does it really mean? It's not as easy as if my table has 10 columns than I can't insert more than 100 rows (1000 columns divided with 10 columns = maximun 100 rows to insert), or?
Is there a better/more appropriate way to do insert many rows?
Should I do my inserts with an OracleTransaction (My application is developed with C# and asp.net), as ~follows
BEGIN
INSERT INTO tableA Values ('A', 'B', 'C', 1, 2, 3)
INSERT INTO tableA Values ('D', 'E', 'F', 4, 5, 6)
INSERT INTO tableA Values ('G', 'H', 'I', 7, 8, 9)
COMMIT
END
Thx in advance!
Edited by: user8819407 on 2010-mar-07 15:40

Hi,
So how did you solve the problem? Can you please give an example?
I have the same problem inserting over 1000 values into my Oracle DB. The table only has 51 columns but to speed up the insert command, I use bulk inserts via insert all command. I need to insert 100 rows at a time for a total of 5100 values.
Example:
SQLCmd = INSERT ALL INTO MYTABLE (VAL_ID,VAL_NAME,VAL_NUM,VAL_TIME,VAL_CMM,VAL_TIME1,VAL_TRIP,VAL_REMAINING,VAL_AGE,VAL_COUNT,VAL_RSTS,VAL_VOLT,VAL_RF,VAL_DC,VAL_HOPS,VAL_STATUS,VAL_ELAPSED,MODIFY_TIME) VALUES (?,?,?,TO_DATE(?,?),?,TO_DATE(?,?),?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,SYSTIMESTAMP)
INTO MYTABLE (VAL_ID,VAL_NAME,VAL_NUM,VAL_TIME,VAL_CMM,VAL_TIME1,VAL_TRIP,VAL_REMAINING,VAL_AGE,VAL_COUNT,VAL_RSTS,VAL_VOLT,VAL_RF,VAL_DC,VAL_HOPS,VAL_STATUS,VAL_ELAPSED,MODIFY_TIME) VALUES (?,?,?,TO_DATE(?,?),?,TO_DATE(?,?),?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,SYSTIMESTAMP)
INTO MYTABLE (VAL_ID,VAL_NAME,VAL_NUM,VAL_TIME,VAL_CMM,VAL_TIME1,VAL_TRIP,VAL_REMAINING,VAL_AGE,VAL_COUNT,VAL_RSTS,VAL_VOLT,VAL_RF,VAL_DC,VAL_HOPS,VAL_STATUS,VAL_ELAPSED,MODIFY_TIME) VALUES (?,?,?,TO_DATE(?,?),?,TO_DATE(?,?),?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,SYSTIMESTAMP)
INTO MYTABLE (VAL_ID,VAL_NAME,VAL_NUM,VAL_TIME,VAL_CMM,VAL_TIME1,VAL_TRIP,VAL_REMAINING,VAL_AGE,VAL_COUNT,VAL_RSTS,VAL_VOLT,VAL_RF,VAL_DC,VAL_HOPS,VAL_STATUS,VAL_ELAPSED,MODIFY_TIME) VALUES (?,?,?,TO_DATE(?,?),?,TO_DATE(?,?),?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,SYSTIMESTAMP)
SELECT 1 FROM DUAL
SQLVals = 1 22C38299 80700334 04-19-2012 13:55:33 mm-dd-yyyy hh24:mi:ss MCC93000 04/19/2012 13:55:42 mm-dd-yyyy hh24:mi:ss 12 4 0.792191 23 1 0.00 -113.50 13.48 9 1 9
1 36PR7038 8070EDC2 04-19-2012 12:24:35 mm-dd-yyyy hh24:mi:ss MCC60360 04/19/2012 12:24:41 mm-dd-yyyy hh24:mi:ss 7 4 0.757501 3 2 13.88 -114.80 14.06 5 1 6
1 42C63512 8050166F 04-19-2012 16:02:50 mm-dd-yyyy hh24:mi:ss MCC52420 04/19/2012 16:02:57 mm-dd-yyyy hh24:mi:ss 10 4 0.778471 8 1 0.00 -122.30 13.05 8 1 7
1 33MR3076 80803E75 04-19-2012 13:13:16 mm-dd-yyyy hh24:mi:ss MCC60330 04/19/2012 13:13:22 mm-dd-yyyy hh24:mi:ss 13 5 0.636721 28 3 0.00 -122.19 0.70 8 1 6
Then I call: &DBInsert($sqlCmd, @sqlVals);
This is the error I get: ORA-24335: cannot support more than 1000 columns.
I need to insert about 879,500 rows (51 cols per row). The values I read from a text file in sets of about 48,000 and put them into a hash. I tried inserting one row at a time, but it takes too long, about 28 hrs! Then, I tried the bulk update with only 6 rows and the total time was about 25 minutes. Which is acceptable to us.
Thanks!

How to pass more than 1000 entries in 'IN' clause, Oracle 11g

Hi All,
I know this is a very common question in Oracle discussion forum. But, Im in different zone.
I use C#, .NET and Oracle 11g. I have a situation where I will create a query statement using 'IN' clause in C# code based on my requirement and execute that statement from code itself with oracle connection object. I do not have any procedures. I must phrase my query statement and pass it on to OracleConnection object to execute it.
My code looks like this....
List<decimal> x_Ids = new List<decimal>();
I will load my IDs into x_Ids here;
string whereInClause = ........I will prepare a 'IN' clause (All IDs separated by ',')
My query would looks like this....
string query = select * from MYTABLE where X_ID in [ whereInClause with more than 1000 entries]
oraConn.ExecuteQuery(query);
I have a workaround with OR operator with 'IN' clause like below.
X_ID in [ Ids till 1000 entries] OR X_ID in [Next 1000 entries] OR X_ID in [Next 1000 entries] ....so on.....
It is working, but, I heard that this may slowdown the performance of the application. Is this really a performance hit to my application?
Can you please suggest any other workaround to overcome this situation?

>
I have a workaround with OR operator with 'IN' clause like below.
X_ID in [ Ids till 1000 entries] OR X_ID in [Next 1000 entries] OR X_ID in [Next 1000 entries] ....so on.....
It is working, but, I heard that this may slowdown the performance of the application. Is this really a performance hit to my application?There should be no performance difference between a statement like
select * from myTab
where ID in (1,2,3,4,5)
OR ID in (6,7,8,10,12) and
select * from myTab
where ID in (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,10,12) The execution plan should be identical.
However those values might better be send as a single object (collection or table of numbers type).
I think the ODP or OO4O connectivity allows to create and such oracle object types.
Another way could be to think about how all the values are created? Did any user enter them manually? Certainly not. Then maybe you can apply the same logic to the SQL statement that created those values in your .Net application.
something like
select * from myTab
where ID in (select t2.FK_ID from otherTab t2 where t2.Col1 = 100) This approach would probably beat all others performancewise. Since you avoid the overhead of constructing the in-lists.

Writeback error when updating number more than 1000- URGENT!!

Hi,
I am suing writeback feature in OBIEE 11g, the xml script I am using is
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
- <WebMessageTables xmlns:sawm="com.siebel.analytics.web/message/v1">
- <WebMessageTable lang="en-us" system="WriteBack" table="Messages">
- <WebMessage name="writeback">
- <XML>
- <writeBack connectionPool="connectionpool">
<insert>INSERT INTO XXINPT_WRITE_BACK(RECORD_ID,BUDGET_CATEGORY,BUDGET_SUB_CATEGORY,DESCR_SEGMENT2,JUL,AUG,SEP,OCT,NOV,DEC,JAN,FEB,MAR,APR,MAY,JUN,TOTALS) VALUES('@1',@2,@3,@4,@5,@6,@7,@8,@9,@10,@11,@12,@13,@14,@15,@16,@17)</insert>
<update>UPDATE XXINPT_WRITE_BACK SET "JUL"=@5,"AUG"=@6,"SEP"=@7,"OCT"=@8,"NOV"=@9,"DEC"=@10,"JAN"=@11,"FEB"=@12,"MAR"=@13,"APR"=@14,"MAY"=@15,"JUN"=@16 WHERE "RECORD_ID"='@1'</update>
</writeBack>
</XML>
</WebMessage>
</WebMessageTable>
</WebMessageTables>
I am able to update values less than 1000 but I am getting a writeback error when I try to update values more than 1000 please help, It is very urgent.
Thanks in advance.

Hi, It is just saying writeback error. there is no other information. Do not know where to check the log file.

INDIRECT for more than 1000 Rows

Here's a puzzler!
Why does this not work for values at G6579 of more than 1000, i.e., for Cells below C1000.
=IF(G6579<=0,CHAR(32),INDIRECT("C"&G6579))
It works fine for all the rows above 6579 which find rows above C1000. The Cells in column C have values, but at Row 6579 and below, this formula generates "This formula contains an invalid reference".
Have I hit a limit on allowable INDIRECT argument values?
Dick

Dick Huitema wrote:
YVAN:
May you explain why you use CHAR(32) to define a string of one space ?
DICK:
I want the cell left blank; if there's a better way, I'm all ears. I might then be able to use the test you recommended (using LEN)... although I haven't needed one so far.
Further thoughts?
BARRY:
Previous thoughts, actually. Yvan, as he mentioned, had suggested using the empty string ( "" ) >instead of a space.
=IF(G6579<=0,"",INDIRECT("C"&1000))
Must have had your earplugs in at the time. ;-)</div>
Yup! And the sleep mask must have been on, too!
Sorry Yvan... I didn't quite understand what "empty string" meant and thought you were trying to suggest using LEN... which made no sense, of course.
An empty string is a string which contains nothing, the one defined by ""
=CHAR(32) defines a string of one space character, the one which is often created using =" "
In many tables, we need to take care of empty cells.
The true definition of an empty cell is a cell which contains nothind.
This status may be checked thanks to the function ISBLANK(theCell).
Alas, as there is no function allowing us to define the value of a cell to nothing (I'm desparately waiting for the function BLANK()) we have to use the canada dry blank cell.
My own choice is to set the content of the cell to the empty string ("") . You used the space (" ").
I described the way o check if a cell if "blank in the extended fashion"
LEN(of a true empty cell) is zero, because the length of nothing is nil.
LEN(of a cell containing "") is zero, because it's the definition of the empty string.
So, the single instruction LEN(theCell) give us the wanted informatioN
If you use the space string, the test is more complex. The one which I sdescribed was wrong because it didn't treated the case of a table using both empty strings and space strings.
It would be
=IF(OR(LEN(theCell)=0,theCell=" "),theCellIisEmpty,theCellIsNotEmpty)
Yvan KOENIG (VALLAURIS, France) lundi 12 juillet 2010 19:15:08

Vector or ArrayList use for dropdown with more than 1000 entries

Hi Friends
I am having more than 1000 entries of different TimeZone's which i need to display in a dropdown list.
i am not able to decide whether i need to use a Vector or Arraylist for storing these values.
please let me know which one will be best suited to use in case the list entry is more than 1000 characters.
waiting for a positive reply from your side.
Thanks & Regards
Vikeng

A JComboBox can be constructed from a Vector (rather than any other sort of List) without having to implement your own ComboBoxModel. (JList is similar).
I agree with kajbj - a control like this with a thousand entries is rather poor interface design. One exception might be if the entries are sorted in some way, and you "jump" to the appropriate place in the list as the user types.

To display text field with more than 1000 length in ALV

Hi Friends,
I need to display material long text field which is more than 1000 length in ALV or Object oriented ALV.
Please help me to resolve the issue.
Regards,
Jaya.

Hi,
U mean to say in a single cell of ALV ??
It is not possible in ALV .. As per OSS note 857823
Below is the reason for same.. I think you should to split in number of columns.
Summary
Symptom
Entries in cells of the type CHAR or string are truncated after 128 characters in the SAP GUI.
Other terms
ALV Grid Control (cl_gui_alv_grid), function module (Full-screen)
Grid (Reuse_alv_grid_display, SAPLSLVC_FULLSCREEN), SAPGUI, back end, front end
Reason and Prerequisites
The data table that is sent to the front end only allows character values with the length 128.
Solution
This is the standard system behavior and cannot be changed.

Is it possible to use more than one value in SUPPRESSCHARACTER option

Hi,
Is it possible to Suppress more than one value uisng SUPPRESSCHARACTER option in transformation file?
if yes, any syntax?
I have 'Z' and '1000' that i wish to suppress from the values being loaded. Any thoughts ?
Thanks.

HI,
i don't really know if it's possible to suppress more than one character, but you can do load your data in two steps in the first step skip all the information that has the Z character in your conversion file and skip all 1000 values, then repeat the process but this time skip the 1000 values and then suppress the Z value...
hope this helps,

Call Transaction and fill a select-options field with more than one value?

Hello everybody,
how can I fill a select-options field with more than one value.
Here is the code example:
CLEAR: GT_BDCDATA, GS_BDCDATA.
GS_BDCDATA-program = 'RHALEINI'.
GS_BDCDATA-DYNPRO = '1000'.
GS_BDCDATA-DYNBEGIN = 'X'.
APPEND GS_BDCDATA TO GT_BDCDATA.
CLEAR: GS_BDCDATA.
GS_BDCDATA-FNAM = 'PCHOTYPE'.
GS_BDCDATA-FVAL = 'P'.
APPEND GS_BDCDATA TO GT_BDCDATA.
CLEAR: GS_BDCDATA.
LOOP AT gt_hrobjinfty INTO gs_hrobjinfty.
    GS_BDCDATA-FNAM = 'PCHOBJID-LOW'.
    GS_BDCDATA-FVAL = gs_hrobjinfty-objid.
    APPEND GS_BDCDATA TO GT_BDCDATA.
    CLEAR: GS_BDCDATA.
ENDLOOP.
CALL TRANSACTION 'PFAL' USING GT_BDCDATA MODE 'A'
                   MESSAGES INTO GT_MESSAGES.
THX.

Hi,
Please refer the code below:
*Code used to populate 'select-options' & execute report
DATA: seltab type table of rsparams,
      seltab_wa like line of seltab.
seltab_wa-selname = 'PNPPERNR'.
seltab_wa-sign    = 'I'.
seltab_wa-option = 'EQ'.
* load each personnel number accessed from the structure into
* parameters to be used in the report
loop at pnppernr.
    seltab_wa-low = pnppernr-low.
    append seltab_wa to seltab.
endloop.
SUBMIT zreport with selection-table seltab
                                via selection-screen.
Thanks,
Sriram Ponna.

More than 1000 values

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for