MOTION : Stabilize - Smooth Problem

Hi all! I have a problem with stabilize... I need to smooth some steady shoot. The problem is that when I cross, i.e. a tree or a column, or I find a lens flare, the stabilizator make strange things...
I tried to track the pixels, but it never work. Instead, every time I stop the analysys it restart from the beginning.
Some tut or suggestions?
Thanks to all...

The supplementary help pdf (under the Help menu) explains how to use an offset track to deal with these issues - but it is tricky to get it to work correctly.

Similar Messages

  • 2 days ago my FF3.6.3 started becoming extremely slow/delayed on EVERYTHING/ALL ACTIONS (I have been using 3.6.3 for a few months with NO problems, until 2 days ago). Scrolling going in delayed/slow 'waves' motion (not smooth & fast), Right-click box ver

    2 days ago my FF3.6.3 started becoming extremely slow/delayed on EVERYTHING/ALL ACTIONS (I have been using 3.6.3 for a few months with NO problems, until 2 days ago). Scrolling going in delayed/slow/jerky 'waves' motion (not smooth & fast), Right-click box very delayed/hangs in coming up, Text typing lagging/intermittent, activity extremely slow/delayed when pointing mouse over anything, changing from tab to tap extremely slow. Bascially EVERYTHING has become sooo slow, delayed, lagging etc. I have tried ALL possible checks (extensions, add-ons, plug-ins, download history, cache, cookies) & viewed nearly ALL the FF help sites. Is this a sudden/recent bug?? It doesnt only happen with Facebook, but EVERY window I open!!
    == This happened ==
    Every time Firefox opened
    == approx. 2 days ago

    I've personally not seen this behaviour since Firefox version 2. It however re-appeared for me in 3.6.6 and 3.6.7 (current) and it's bloody awful. Makes everything I do take 50% longer ..... great for efficiency in the modern world.
    This 3.6 branch is so riddle with flaws which seem never to be fixed. Each fix / update brings with it more problems ... worst of all I see version 4 is already in development but they cannot even get 3.6 right ??? WTF ????
    Mozilla must stop chasing version numbers as has become the trend in the software world. Fix an existing version to perfection then start working on a new branch of the product.

  • Dropping frames after Motion stabilization

    Hello,
    I'm having a weird problem with Motion and FCP. I'm running FCP Studio 2 (FCP 6) on a MacPro Intel Dual-Quad Core with 2GB of RAM and a Kona 3 card. My media is on 2 internal hard drives - SATA 7200, 500GB each, speed=3gigabits.
    I'm working in Apple Prores 422 HQ. When I open my project and play my sequence it plays back fine. I send a clip to Motion (with embed motion content and launch motion checked) and apply motion stabilization; save then quit. I go back over to FCP and I can't play my timeline for more than a couple of seconds before I get dropped frames. It's not just when I play the new Motion clip in the timeline - it's everywhere and it's random. This happens before and after I render. If I remove the motion clip I still get dropped frames. If I shut down FCP without saving and reopen the project (no Motion work having been preserved) it plays back fine. I've tried trashing prefs to no avail. Any advice? I like the elegance of this workflow...if it works! I'm wondering if this is a bug that updating to FCP 6.0.1 will fix.
    Thanks in advance for any thoughts...

    Alright...I tried a clip using Smoothcam and you're right - fabulous results, analyzation and render times were actually quite fast. However - same dropped frame problem I was getting with Motion. Exact same problem. My system is beefy enough for this, right? I have 2 GB of RAM - I had 5 GB but AJA had me remove 3GB so that I could capture Prores HQ (apparently the Kona 3 with v 4.0 software has a bug that won't allow it to work well on systems with over 2GB of RAM - i.e. couldn't capture prores without dropping frames)
    I'm trashing prefs and restarting my system. If this doesn't work I'm going to try updating everything unless anyone out there knows what might be the culprit.

  • Any tips on making slow motion clips "smoother" (interpolation)?

    I was not able to find this in the documentation.
    I need to render a sequence with a clip that is at 40% speed (slow motion), this clip is of a time lapse weather (clouds) video.
    I would like to know what type of interpolation Final Cut Pro uses (if any) and if there are any methods to improve the fludity of clips that are set to slow motion. Right now the section of the rendered video where the slow motion clip is (the clouds) appear a bit "jumpy' and I would like to have them a bit "smoother".

    Thanks, I've tried a couple from everyone's suggestions; from frame blend, to motion blur, and to the optical flow (in Motion).
    The problem is that with cloud time lapse video in slow motion there is still some level of "jumpyness" from one frame (one time lapse frame, not frame in the video file) to the other.
    With optical flow, it is quite nice, but it makes it move incredibly smooth from one frame, but then pauses, and then incredibly smooth to the next, so it's not really usable for cloud time lapse video.
    I'm still hoping for some kind of better interpolation effect that I haven't found yet.

  • Effect or script to smoothly center a layer after motion stabilization

    Suppose I've used the motion tracker to perfectly stabilize a feature of interest. As a result, the feature is dead still within the frame. What I'm trying to achieve is to stabilize the jerky motion but preserve the overall motion of the feature around the frame.
    For example, suppose that at the start of the footage, the feature is in the left half of the frame, then moves to the right, and then to the top. After stabilization, the feature is stationary while the layer is shifted to the right, then to the left, then to the bottom to compensate. What I'd like to see instead is that it stays generally in the left half, then generally in the right, then at the top, like it did initially, only with sudden jerks smoothed out.
    To do what I want, I'm now thinking of having the (stabilized) layer get gently "pulled" towards the center of the frame, so that sudden shifts due to the stabilization are still there, but overall the layer returns to the center eventually.
    Another way of looking at this is that I'd like to apply a high-pass filter to the tracked path, removing low-frequency motion from the path.
    Does anyone know of a ready-made effect or script to achieve this?

    You're overthinking this. Retaining smooth motion while remove jerky motion is built into the Warp Stabilizer effect. You don't need to run a script afterward or anything. I show how to remove jerks while retainng a camera pan in this video:
    http://www.video2brain.com/en/lessons/overview-of-warp-stabilizer-effect
    I strongly recommend that you work your way through these materials before trying to use the Warp Stabilizer effect:
    http://blogs.adobe.com/toddkopriva/2011/04/warp-stabilizer-in-after-effects-cs5-5.html

  • Motion Stabilize vs Shake Smooth Cam

    Hello all,
    I am a Final Cut Express user that is looking to take some camera jitter out of a few clips I've taken. I know that FCE has and image stabilizer filter but for the life of me I can not seem to get good results by using it. This may or may not be operator error but in my defense I have done some research on using it. I also have access to Motion as well as Shake and in my research I've discovered that these apps also have tools for image stabilization.
    I've also discovered iStabilize which is much more consumer based (probably a good thing based on my sklills) but it would require purchasing it and it mostly likely will not provide the results of Motion or Shake (if I can figure out how to use them).
    To remove the video camera shake, which app will most likely produce better results and what additional considerations should be noted?
    Keep in mind that I have a decent background with FCE but virtually no background in Shake or Motion. I have however reviewed the manuals and watched a few demos. I've also launched both apps and have taken a stab at both (again with limited results). In motion I was able to apply the Stabilizer behavior and actually export the clip but I'm pretty confident I'm not utilizing it to the fullest as my clip is still very shaky. In Shake I was able to start a new script and add the Smooth Cam node but I could not figure out how to export the clip. Can I export as a quicktime file so I can easily put it back into my FCE project?
    So I guess my main questions are:
    Which app will remove camera shake better?
    How do I actually do it?
    Before I switched to Mac I used a very basic app for image stabilization. It was not a pro app but it was easy to use and produced decent results. I liked the fact that it had a split screen view where I can compare the clip before and after. From my poking around in Motion and Shake I can't seem to find a similar view.
    Any help or advice is greatly appreciated!
    ps. Here is an example of the videos I make. Its non-professional but I do like my projects to look decent. If I can learn a little about Motion or Shake and successfully have a good workflow for removing camera shake I will be thrilled. Thanks!
    http://www.splitboard.com/vids/somewhere.mov
    Message was edited by: bcrider

    hi,
    I'm not a big Shaker user but i believe you have to apply an Output node in order to render stuff out. However Specialcase is correct since Motion and Shake use the same technologies the results should be pretty similar. Motion is obviously easier to use. Just play around with the settings you'll get there. Motion doesnt have the split pane view, but you can just toggle the filter on and off to compare.
    Had a look at your film, and it looks very nice, the images are really stunning, well shot. Does that have camera stabilization in it. Looks pretty good. But did you know that the music track is only coming out of one channel?
    Keep at it
    regards
    adam

  • Motion Stabilizer vs Shake Smooth Cam

    Hello all,
    I am a Final Cut Express user that is looking to take some camera jitter out of a few clips I've taken. I know that FCE has and image stabilizer filter but for the life of me I can not seem to get good results by using it. This may or may not be operator error but in my defense I have done some research on using it. I also have access to Motion as well as Shake and in my research I've discovered that these apps also have tools for image stabilization.
    I've also discovered iStabilize which is much more consumer based (probably a good thing based on my sklills) but it would require purchasing it and it mostly likely will not provide the results of Motion or Shake (if I can figure out how to use them).
    To remove the video camera shake, which app will most likely produce better results and what additional considerations should be noted?
    Keep in mind that I have a decent background with FCE but virtually no background in Shake or Motion. I have however reviewed the manuals and watched a few demos. I've also launched both apps and have taken a stab at both (again with limited results). In motion I was able to apply the Stabilizer behavior and actually export the clip but I'm pretty confident I'm not utilizing it to the fullest as my clip is still very shaky. In Shake I was able to start a new script and add the Smooth Cam node but I could not figure out how to export the clip. Can I export as a quicktime file so I can easily put it back into my FCE project?
    So I guess my main questions are:
    Which app will remove camera shake better?
    How do I actually do it?
    Before I switched to Mac I used a very basic app for image stabilization. It was not a pro app but it was easy to use and produced decent results. I liked the fact that it had a split screen view where I can compare the clip before and after. From my poking around in Motion and Shake I can't seem to find a similar view.
    Any help or advice is greatly appreciated!
    ps. Here is an example of the videos I make. Its non-professional but I do like my projects to look decent. If I can learn a little about Motion or Shake and successfully have a good workflow for removing camera shake I will be thrilled. Thanks!
    http://www.splitboard.com/vids/somewhere.mov
    Message was edited by: bcrider

    YOU DA MAN captain mench!
    That was just the type of thing I was looking for. It really helped bring the pre-existing knowledge I've gathered from my readings and 1st attempt into scope. I've now got the motivation and confidence to get back into shake and try it again. Thanks!
    In regards to the camera and video. Thanks and glad you liked it. I shot it with the Canon HV10. The video I posted wasn't so much an example of the camera jitter as much as it was just an example of what I do. Thanks for the advice either way. I'm looking forward to doing more color correction in my projects too. Up until now I've settled for less. As I learn the apps I'm more interested in making the absolute best I can. I'm sure I don't have to tell you it's a work in progress.
    Thanks again. I'll be back if I need more help.
    ps. Does color correcting the clip first have any effect on how well Shake and SmoothCam will remove jitter? Also, when I send from FCP to Shake does it remove the interlacing? I noticed that SmoothCam only works with de-interlaced footy. Thoughts?

  • After Effects CS3 Motion Stabilize Irritation

    Hello!
    I am pretty new to After Effects, and I've been trying to learn learn learn. Though, I am having a strange and annoying problem.
    Imagine you set the table for dinner. and everything is perfect. Then when you go to put dinner on it. everything is messed up again!
    Aside from the analogy, lemme explain my problem... I have some pretty shakey footage I am working with. I am trying to stabilize it. It is only standard def, but I have a point in the video that I can easily track.
    I'll set it up by:
    Clicking the layer
    Opening the Tracker Controls box
    Clicking Stabilize Motion
    Setting up the tracker point
    Then I'll click the analyze button. It tracks it fine. I then hit apply. It worked! I made it perfect for me!
    Then the problem arises. For what reason, I am not sure. But anytime I RAM preview it again, or render it, it gets worse!
    The picture gets jumpier each time. I'm absolutley baffled. I went closer to try and figure it out. I checked frame by frame and it seems that the motion tracker gets knocked a little early or late or something. For example, in a video 3 frames in length. The first 2 targets are in the center, and then it moves right, and the tracker follows this fine. Then I watch it again, and the first frame is correct, then the 2nd frame moves where the 3rd should be, and the 3rd frame is correct. If that made any sense.
    I am hoping that someone out there has any advice for me. I'm starting to get frustrated.
    Thanks,
    ~Bill L.

    Thanks for the help.
    I makes sense that it is the frames.
    So I'm checking the frame rates now. Under the video file interpretation,
    Frame Rate: "Use frame rate from file: (29.970 fps)"
    Fields and Pulldown: Spereate Fields=Off
    Square pixels.
    Under the Comp(which was made from just dragging my file to the timeline)
    Frame Rate: 29.97 Frames per second
    Advanced:
    ~Preserve frame rate when nested or in render queue is UNCHECKED
    ~Preserve resolution when nested is UNCHECKED
    Not sure if there is something I didn't list here that would need to be. I still can't get the video to work and these seem like the right settings.
    Is there something I'm not seeing? Or is this something I just don't know to check ?
    Thanks again,
    ~Bill L.
    ******EDIT******
    P.S. I also tried stabilizing the footage when the video's frame rate was set to "Conform to frame rate 29.97" Same issue, everytime I RAM preview/render the footage gets jumpier and jumpier.

  • 70" Aquos LED, Serious motion-blu​r problems. Help

    I have a LC70LE732U 70" Sharp Aquos LED HDTV, and I can't help but notice the serious motion-blur. When watching fast-paced movement (such as a baseball soaring through the air), the blur/lag is incredible. Is there any specific reason as to why this happens on this extremely expensive and so-called "high quality" television? If so, are there any settings that I can set my TV to in order to rid of this highly noticable problem? Thanks.

    All signals, broadcast and recorded (DVD, BLu-ray, etc) are 60 Hz.  No amount of doubling, tripling, etc, will get rid of it.  If you have turned on Smooth-motion, and still get the lag, you'll just have to live with it.  Since the original sighanl is recorded, encoded and broadcast at 60Hz, the lag will be there. 
    If you find my post useful or informative, please click the icon below with the plus sign and star to give kudos. Thank you!

  • Motion stabilization

    I am working on a stop-motion sequence in after effects and have a question about how to stabilize the motion of the sequence. We have a series of photos which have been taken progressively of a building beening built and the camera was accidentally moved a few times from its original position. The photos have been imported in series of JPEG sequences. I used the motion tracking panel to attempt to correct the problem (set 1 track point, analyzed it, and then clicked apply)...
    I noticed that the track point often has a difficult time sticking to where it was first placed...from the first frame to the next (where the camera jump occurred)...

    Try Magic Bullet Steady. Simple tracking will not solve your issue anyway. What you need is a way to average the pixel differences and that requires more magic than simply pinning one point. You will not avoid manual adjustments, though. Some items will be too far off, so you need to manually position them in a sub-comp, then run the stabilization with MB Steady on the sub-comp layer in your main comp.
    Mylenium

  • IOS7.0.3 Reduce Motion fixes the problem for some, but goes too far.

    In the past, reduce motion would disable the parallax effect, which is basically when the wallpaper shifts back and forth as you tilt the screen. This parallax effect was rather pointless to have, but it was pretty big on draining battery (I noticed around 10-20% longer battery life after turning Reduce Motion on).
    Now, reduce motion not only disables the parallax effect, but all the zooming motions as you open apps or folders. The problem with this is that some people, such as myself, really enjoy those zooming motions. However, the parallax effect (wallpaper shifting) was pretty pointless and not too noticeable, so turning that off was fine.
    I would like to have the option to turn specific things off. For example, an on-or-off button for the parallax effect. A separate on-or-off button for zooming motions when you open apps and folders. That way, I can still have the iOS motion I love, and save that much battery power at the same time. I don't really like the smooth overlay transition, it's not as exciting and it feels too much like Droid OS.

    Sorry but no point in telling us, Apple is not here this is just a user to user forum for technical support. If you wish to see something change in the OS then you can provide Apple with feedback here:
    http://www.apple.com/feedback/

  • Motion Tracking Jitter Problem

    Using CS3, I am basically trying to replace facial features on individuals in some footage that I have. (replacing mouths, eyes, etc) I have been through numerous tutorials on motion tracking and have it down pretty well. I am tracking motion for both position and rotation, and the motion trackers are pretty dead on. However, after I apply the motion tracking and attempt to to pick whip other layers to this (I have tried numerous ways, nulls, directly to the tracked footage layer, etc...) it is very jittery, it follows the motion trackers just fine, but is very jittery...
    I have found a few other with this problem, but no solutions were found. The only solution that I found was a suggestion to Average the null with a long expression that I had no idea how it worked. It there a quick fix for this? My whole 3 minute video is relying on motion tracking and parenting layers to the original footage... PLEASE HELP
    also, would Mocha be worth getting, would it solve this issue?

    Here's a post that links to some resources for face replacement using motion tracking.
    If your only problem is that the motion isn't smooth enough, and you want to remove some of the detail in the motion, you can use the Smoother or the smooth expression method.

  • Warp Stabilizer Transcode Problem

    I shoot in 720 30p, and I normally render to an MP4 file. I need to create a DVD, and I'm using Encore for that. But I think my problem is with Premiere Pro--here's what it is: I use the Warp Stabilizer effect to smooth out my jib shots. When I render out from my PP timeline to MPEG2-DVD, I get the striped band across the screen, telling me that the effect is currently stabilizing. If you use the Warp Stabilizer, you know what I'm talking about.
    I'm guessing that as the timeline is transcoded to MPEG2 (an m2v and accompanying wav and xmp files), PP has to rerun the stabilizer for the transcode, and the transcoder proceeds before stabilization is complete.
    Has anyone else come across this problem? Any suggestions on how to fix it? Thanks for your help.

    After testing a bit more, I discovered that on the second attempt, the warp-stabilized clips transcoded correctly, with no 'Stabilizing' band across the screen. Apparently, the stabilization only ran once once when I changed the export settings from 720 30p to DVD.

  • 3d motion tween load problem

    Hey all,
    I'm having a problem which has made me struggling for two days. I hope i can get some new ideas for my problem here.
    I created a fla which includes several 3d motion tween in CS5.5, when it's compiled it works perfect. But when i try to load this swf into my main project, images get blurry and distorted. Below is the screenshot of the situation. The first one is the correct one, and second one is loaded into main project. I read that scaling 3d tweens might cause such problems and tried to fix it by two solutions. As first, i tried to retransform the tween by: myContainer.transform.matrix = new Matrix(); but didn't work out. As second, i tried to rescale the stage which mentioned as a solution is some blogs.
    And i don't know if it is some kind of bug as mentioned here: http://forums.adobe.com/message/2258767
    I'd really be glad if i can get some ideas, thanks all.

    anyone?

  • Font Smoothing Problem?

    9800, v6.0.0.246, Platform 6.4.0.105
    AT&T
    I have noticed that as soon as I started Desktop Service Synchronization, font smooting goes off (see below), before that, everything looks fine.   Any clue?
    Thanks,
    Phil.
    Solved!
    Go to Solution.

    I too had the same problem just last night. It happened when I was changing the font and font size. It seemed that everytime I switched the font and font size, the text got more and more pixelated and less smooth (identical to the screenshot you just posted).
    I backed up my Torch, did a security wipe and then restored the backup file back onto the device. That didn't work, as the text still looked horrible.
    So what I did next was do a device switch from my Torch back onto my Bold 9000, security wiped the Torch then did a device switch from the Bold 9000 back onto the Torch and the text was back to normal! It was a long process but it seemed to do the trick. So if you have another BlackBerry sitting around it might be worth trying, just remember to back up your Torch before hand.
    My Torch is also running v6.0.0.246, Platform 6.4.0.105 through Rogers. Hope this helps you out.
    Good Luck!
    Ed

Maybe you are looking for