Mounting Solaris 10 concatenated disk array?

I have attempted to mount a D130 disk array attached to an E420R system running Solaris 10. This array has three drives installed an formatted. I would like to mount the three disks as one large storage partition. It seems to me that I want a concatenated stripe but I am not really sure.
This is what I have so far:
# format
2. c0t2d0 <SUN18G cyl 7506 alt 2 hd 19 sec 248> d130-1
/pci@1f,0/pci@1,1/scsi@2/sd@2,0
3. c0t3d0 <SUN18G cyl 7506 alt 2 hd 19 sec 248> d130-2
/pci@1f,0/pci@1,1/scsi@2/sd@3,0
4. c0t4d0 <SUN18G cyl 7506 alt 2 hd 19 sec 248> d130-3
/pci@1f,0/pci@1,1/scsi@2/sd@4,0
# metastat
d1: Concat/Stripe
Size: 106067120 blocks (50 GB)
Stripe 0:
Device Start Block Dbase Reloc
c0t4d0s6 9424 No Yes
Stripe 1:
Device Start Block Dbase Reloc
c0t3d0s6 4712 No Yes
Stripe 2:
Device Start Block Dbase Reloc
c0t2d0s6 4712 No Yes
Device Relocation Information:
Device Reloc Device ID
c0t4d0 Yes id1,sd@SSEAGATE_ST318203LSUN18G_LRK4938300002106U7JZ
c0t3d0 Yes id1,sd@SSEAGATE_ST318203LSUN18G_LRJ9725900002105G9EY
c0t2d0 Yes id1,sd@SSEAGATE_ST318203LSUN18G_LRK19873000021073LVN
How do I mount this as one combined single slice?
I appreciate anyone's assitance here.

I have attempted to mount a D130 disk array attached
to an E420R system running Solaris 10. This array has
three drives installed an formatted. I would like to
mount the three disks as one large storage partition.
It seems to me that I want a concatenated stripe but
I am not really sure.Either a concatenation or a stripe. I'm not sure what a concatenated stripe is.
Neither will offer redundancy. A concatenation can be more easily extended in the future, while a stripe would offer better performance in most situations.
metastat
d1: Concat/Stripe
Size: 106067120 blocks (50 GB)
Stripe 0:
Device Start Block Dbase Reloc
c0t4d0s6 9424 No Yes
Stripe 1:
Device Start Block Dbase Reloc
c0t3d0s6 4712 No Yes
Stripe 2:
Device Start Block Dbase Reloc
c0t2d0s6 4712 No YesSo a 3 column stripe totalling 50G.
How do I mount this as one combined single slice?The devices are /dev/md/rdsk/d1 and /dev/md/dsk/d1. You could place a filesystem on the character device with newfs and you could mount the block device.
Darren

Similar Messages

Mounting Solaris 8 formated disk to solaris10 X86

I had purchased a 1 TB SATA hard disk and used a special adaptor from Acard to plug it into my scsi bus on a Pinnacle Data System computer (Sun Clone) and succeeded in making 137 GB partitions (slices) and suceeded in using 959Gb which is probably all of the disk anyway. I then had to loan my adaptor to a friend. Unfortunately before I could get it back I had to fly to Germany from California for an emergency sw issue. I then went to Scotland and used a SATA to USB adaptor to plug the hard disk into my E250. I had no problem mounting all the partitions and filling them up. Now my problem (finally) is that I loaded a spare disk for my Lenova T60 with Solaris 10 X86. Why won't the system mount any of the partitions of the TB disk?
The system sees the device in the /dev/dsk directory but keeps telling me the device is already in use or the mount point is busy......I created the mount point. The system sees my 8GB corsair memory stick perfectly. I went into some other points and it seems the disk is an unknown format............what?
Anybody got any ideas, let me know,
Thanks, Mike
ps: Sorry I was so long winded

Hello Mike,
Solaris x86 and Solaris SPARC ufs aren't interchangeable due to big-endian and small-endian dependance.
http://forum.java.sun.com/thread.jspa?threadID=5088476&messageID=9307743
http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/ufs-discuss/2007-April/000857.html
ZFS filesystems are interchangable between x86/x64 and SPARC.
Michael
Edited by: MAAL on Oct 9, 2007 8:42 PM
Added a later google search hit.

HP Proliant 0 Storage Works Disk Array Mounting help

I am a Solaris newbie so please bear with me while i try to explain the problem.
I have just installed Solaris 10 (x86) on a HP Proliant DL380 G4, this involved applying the friver updates for the RAID controller to allow the Solaris install to work.
The machine has two raid controllers the onboard 6i controller and the additional 6400 controller we've added (it's a PCI SCSI controller) to hook up the Storage Works (used to be called Smart Array with Compaq).
Now, i can only see my disks in the server itself and need to know how to mount or add or configure the disks in the storage array. I think i have the driver installed for the 6400 raid controller but the next step i am not sure of.
Is anyone able to offer a suggestion ?
Having a HP server with a Storage Works device and a numebr of additional discs should fairly common but Google hasn't turned up anything useful.

Further information (may or may not be useful).
In the Server BIOS i have the following information for the disk array controller:
Logical Drive #1 RAID 5 1955.8GB
Direct Attached Storage
Controller HP Smart Array 6400, Slot 3
The individual disks are (i have 8 in total):
SCSI Port 1, ID 0
SCSI Port 1, ID 1
SCSI Port 1, ID 2
SCSI Port 1, ID 3
SCSI Port 1, ID 4
SCSI Port 1, ID 5
SCSI Port 1, ID 8
SCSI Port 2, ID 0
I don't know what happened to SCSI Port 1 ID 6 and 7.
In /dev/dsk/ i have quite a few disks listed but htey don't seem to map onto the 8 disks, or the one disk logical disk i was expecting solaris to see.
I thought my disk would be something like
c1t0d0 - is the disk which Solaris install found (i think)
c2t0d0 - this is a symbolis link to devices/pci@0,0/pci8086,3599@6/pci8086,329@0/pci1014,la7@2/pciell,409c@4/sd0@0:wd
Is this my second disk ??

Dynamic online disk array without (reboot -- -r) on Solaris 10.

I am seeking a way to online a new disk array after I have added the array into the fabric (FC switch) with Solaris OS 10 without reboot and reprobe HW command.
This used to work for Solaris OS 9 or lower using command "devfsadm" or "devfsadm -c disk" (class specific).
Leadville command "cfgadm -al" did not see the new path as I was hoping for with tag of "unconfigure" (so that I can configure it in).
Any suggestion on how can I online the disk array using certain OS (Solaris 10) command would be very much appriciated.
Please, let me know.
If it is possible. My email address is
[email protected]
thanks much
juan.

Folks,
Interesting info as I tried with SPARC base runing Solaris 10 OS. The daemon is auto imported the unit without I have to issue the OS scan device "devfsadm".
# cat /etc/release
Solaris 10 3/05 s10_74L2a SPARC
Copyright 2005 Sun Microsystems, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Use is subject to license terms.
Assembled 22 January 2005
This issue is seen on X386 platform, only.
# cat /etc/release
Solaris 10 3/05 s10_74L2a X86
Copyright 2005 Sun Microsystems, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Use is subject to license terms.
Assembled 22 January 2005
thanks
Hoang.

Using Xserve with Sun StorageTek Disk Array

Hi
Is it possible to connect an Xserve with a Fibre Channel Card installed to a Sun StorageTek 6140 Disk Array?
I don't see any devices in /dev. Is the Xserve limited to the Xserve RAID or can it be used with other storage solutions? Do I need to purchase Xsan to do this (e.g. partition, format and mount a device from the Sun disk array)?
Xserve (Intel) Mac OS X (10.4.9)

Oh my, I should retire...
When I read that page I somehow confused all that X* stuff... :o/
I was wondering if it is possible to connect other
storage solutions than the Xserve RAID (like the Sun
StorageTek ones) directly (or via switch) to an
Xserve (the pizza box server )
Of course you can connect any DAS storage device that presents itself as a raw device on the device channel in use (fc, scsi, ...).
But reading the specs on that special Sun Raid I'd say that it falls into another category: SAN storage. And therefore it needs OS support/drivers which seem to be available only for Solaris, Linux and Win.
How exactly do I partition, format and mount the
virtual device under Mac OS X Server?
DiscUtility.app? In CLI: diskutil
I want to try this procedure:
Connect the Sun Diskarray to the Xserve via the
copper cables.
(Perhaps reboot the Xserve)
Partition with pdisk
mkfs.xfs (or something similar mac os like)
/dev/sda(x)
mount /dev/sda1 /Users/
diskutil
see man diskutil
But as said I guess you can't access this kind of SAN storage device.
Am I completely wrong? It's the procedure in Linux,
so it can't be very different in BSD (say: Mac OS
X)...
Same procedure as every year: install the driver then drink.
-Ralph

NFS write error: on host (10.10.10.10 (the disk array): Not Owner).

A disk array is attached to the Sun OS 5.8 server through NFS and is used for the storage of the iPlanet Message server's message store. There are warnings for this NFS volume: NFS write error: on host (10.10.10.10 (the disk array): Not Owner). What does this mean?
During the restart of the solaris server, this warning messaging repeated endlessly on the screen with a white backgroud.
I had to use Stop-A to stop it, and then, panic and dump occured.
During the startup, a message was "consistent dma sync timeout." What does this mean?
After the server restarted, the NFS warnings are still there.
The server is Solaris 8 on SunFire 480.
What could the problems be? How to solve them?

Thanks.
Let me clarify the situation here:
Only the mailboxes are on the NFS volume and shared by the two mail servers. -
msg-instance/store/mboxlist and msg-instance/store/user are located locally. ONLY msg-instance/store/partition/primary is on the NFS volume and shared between the two mail servers.
So, would this still be a problem?
And, yes, the mailsvr user id exists on the IBM NAS which provides disk arrays for this NFS volume. Do I need grant particular rights to this user on NAS? Do I need to do something on the NFS server which, I think it is the Sun server?
Thanks again.

Disk Array 2530-M2 disk replacement procedure via CLI

Hi,
I wish to know the procedure to replace the Sun/Oracle Storage Disk Array 2530-M2's disk.
From the manuals it can be seen that the expected way is via the WEB based GUI. But the problem is that we haven't installed that, we are using only the CLI based commands (CAM) .
So it will be a great help if I can get any pointers in this regard. Awaiting eagerly.
Thanks,
Savvy

If you want to see what the alarm looks like, you can run the following command on your CAM server:
# ras_admin advisor -e <event type>
/* `ras_admin` is under:
/* Solaris: /opt/SUNWsefms/bin/
/* Linux: /opt/sun/cam/private/fms/bin/
/* Windows: C:\Program Files\Sun\Common Array Manager\Component\fms\bin\
We have three type of PFA, Risk Low, Risk Medium, Risk High.
Example for a 6180 (90.xx.xxxx):
Event Code : 90.66.1026
Event Type : 6180.ProblemEvent.REC_IMPENDING_DRIVE_FAILURE_RISK_LOW
Severity : 0
Sample Description : Impending drive failure for disk {0} (Low Data Availability
Risk).
Probable Cause : A drive is reporting internal errors that could cause the
drive to fail. If the affected drive is an unassigned
drive, it will not be available for volume configuration.
If the affected drive is a Standby hot spare drive, it will
not be available to take over for a failed drive.
Recommended Action : Refer to the Service Advisor procedure for recovering from
this problem.
Event Code : 90.66.1025
Event Type : 6180.ProblemEvent.REC_IMPENDING_DRIVE_FAILURE_RISK_MED
Severity : 0
Sample Description : Impending drive failure in Virtual Disk {0} (Medium Data
Availability Risk), affected drive(s): {1}
Probable Cause : A drive is reporting internal errors that could cause the
drive to fail. If this drive fails, the volumes in the
volume group will become degraded.
Recommended Action : Refer to the Service Advisor procedure for recovering from
this problem.
Event Code : 90.66.1024
Event Type : 6180.ProblemEvent.REC_IMPENDING_DRIVE_FAILURE_RISK_HIGH
Severity : 0
Sample Description : Impending drive failure in Virtual Disk {0} (High Data
Availability Risk), affected drive(s): {1}
Probable Cause : A drive is reporting internal errors that could cause the
drive to fail. If this drive fails before you follow the
recovery steps, the volumes in the volume group will fail
and all data on the volumes will be lost.
Recommended Action : Refer to the Service Advisor procedure for recovering from
this problem.

Mac Pro won't boot to disk array after Mac OS 10.6.8 combo update. Array two partition are there, just won't start off them anymore. Help, please

My 2009 Mac Pro with Highpoint RocketRAID 3522 would no longer boot of the disk array as it had before. Boots off internal HD (still running 10.6.2), sees the array in the Finder, both volumes there pass Disk Utility Repair Disk tests, they show up in System Preferences - Startup Disk. TechTool Pro 5.0.7 sees nothing wrong with the primary boot partition. (didn't try the clone still with 10.6.7) **** frustrating. Tried reinstalling latest firmware for card. Nothing reported by the drives in way of any failure. zapped the PRAM, tried booting with option key, it doesn't show the array but two copies of the internal HD. Running out of ideas. Any out there?

I am having the same problem with my HPT 4321. After upgrade, wont boot. Shows up everyone as bootable disk (even when holding option at startup) but Mac will not boot off it. I installed a fresh 10.6.8 copy onto a usb drive and HPT drivers work so might just be something to do with the main drive being bootable. To complicate things, the Snow Leopard DVD doesn't have the drivers to see the array so cannot use it for troubleshooting. It will not start in safe mode. Downloaded combo updater to try and re-update but it doesn't let you install it on another drive. HPT driver installer doesn't allow you to install on another drive so also can't re-install driver. Only choice seems to be install OS on new disk and recreate everything from scratch, then SuperDuper back to HPT drives and hope that it was a corruption during the update but not sure that it will boot even after all that work.
Anyone have a working computer with 10.6.8 and booting off a Highpoint RAID card?

Can not able to mount ntfs external hard disk

Hi
Getting the below error when try to mount NTFS external harddisk
Disk /dev/sdb: 1000.2 GB, 1000204885504 bytes
255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 121601 cylinders
Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes
Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System
/dev/sdb1 1 121602 976761558 7 HPFS/NTFS
sudo mount -t ntfs /dev/sdb1 /media
[root@devtest ~]# sudo mkdir /media/Skliros_Diskos
[root@devtest ~]# sudo mount -t ntfs-3g /dev/sdb1 /media/Skliros_Diskos
mount: unknown filesystem type 'ntfs-3g'
Rgrds,

Oracle Linux NTFS how-to:
Oracle Linux NTFS how-to

Solaris 10 "No disks found!" -- but disks are, indeed, there!

I am attempting to install Solaris 10 on an E450. I have 4 18G SCSI disks installed in the E450.
When I boot from the install cd (Solaris 10 Install Disk 1), it boots up just fine, and I go through the initial configuration menu (networking, name service, kerberos, etc.), and when it gets to "Configuring System", it stops at 4% with the error "No Disks Found! Please make sure your drives are properly cabled and powered up.".
Clicking "OK" drops me into a terminal window. Running format at this point show all the drives are, indeed, there. I have reformatted and repartitioned the drives, but all to no avail.
Any ideas? Any/all help is MOST appreciated!

ALL
Found the answer!!!!
Seems that the Solaris installer doesnt understand EFI labels, and if (like me) you have been playing around with linux / freebsd ultrasparc ports, you may have inadvertently removed the backup partition (which spans the entire drive, 3rd partiton).
Without this format thinks its dealing with an EFI disk, and you can label it till the cows come home, the installer just doesnt want to know.
The answer is:
'format -e'
select the drive
'label'
select SMI
dont choose format.dat (unless it contains your drive .. unlikely)
choose SCSI 2 autodetect.
partition as per admin manual.
You may also have to do an 'installboot ...etc etc.." <a href="http://docs.sun.com/app/docs/doc/817-5093/6mkisoq39?a=view" target="_blank">http://docs.sun.com/app/docs/doc/817-5093/6mkisoq39?a=view</a> explains it I can now install Solaris 10 The Sproggg PS: I reckon that a brand new drive might need the same treatment.... YMMV PPS: if your disks are over 2 tb they have to use the EFI labelling method ... if you have these you can afford your own sun support contract to figure it out....

How I can to put Solaris on a disk 34 Gb?

I have a AcceleRAID (Level 5) 34Gb
Is it possible to put Solaris on a disk 34 Gb.
It is impossible to me.

Try to install this patch.
http://sunsolve.Sun.COM/pub-cgi/retrieve.pl?doc=fpatches%2F110202&zone_32=IDE
Hope it helps.
Senthilkumar
Developer Technical Support
Sun Microsystems, Inc.
http://www.sun.com/developers/support

Disk array configurations with oracle redo logs and flash recovery area.

Dear Oracle users,
We are planning to buy the new server for oracle database 10g standard edition. We put oracle database file, redo logs, and flash recovery area on each of disk array. My question is what is the best disk array configuration for redo logs and flash recovery area? RAID 10 or RAID 1? Is that possible we can duplicate Flash recovery area to the other location (such as net work drive) at the same time? Since we only have single disk array controller to connect to the disk arrays, I am try to avoid the single failure that will lose archive logs and daily backup.
thanks,
Belinda

Thank you so much for the suggestion. Could you please let me know the answer for my question of FRA redundancy?
“Is that possible we can duplicate Flash recovery area to the other location (such as net work drive) at the same time? Since we only have single disk array controller to connect to the disk arrays, I am try to avoid the single failure that will lose archive logs and daily backup.”

Stripe size for scatch disk array

I am building a CS5/64 workstation running on Win 7/64 that will be used to edit 1-4Gb images. The scratch disks will consist of a RAID 0 array using 3-4 WD600Gb 10K drives shortstroked on an Areca card.
What is the best stripe size for a 3-4 disk array for large images? Does Adobe publish how they R/W to the scratch disk, size of block,etc?
Larry

Right click on the root of your C: drive, and choose Properties.
Click the Hardware tab, select the drive (array) you'd like to set advanced caching on, and click the [Properties] button.
Click the Policies tab, and note the setting of the [ ] Turn off Windows write-cache buffer flushing on the device. This may not be available, depending on the drivers.
Note, specifically, that this feature can cause quite a lot of disk data to end up in your RAM for a while, if an application gets significantly ahead of the drive's ability to write data. This is where the warning about having good battery backup comes in. I'll add my own comment: Your system should be very stable as well. You don't want it crashing when a lot of writes are pending.
-Noel

Video FX: video effects and editing drive (incl. RAID disk arrays)

Having had an issue with rendering iMovie effects and read through a few posted thread, I ran an experiment that pinpoints an incompatibility between iMovie and large size (800GB) RAID array volumes. Hence the following questions:
Is iMovie designed to support large sire RAID disk arrays ?
Could anybody test a non-RAID array large size (say 500GB or better 1000GB) volume to check if it is size or RAID dependent ?
When can we expect a fix ?
For more details, please read on.
Reading through the other threads talking about the Quartz composer effects, it sounds like the Apple programmers have a lot of work ahead to deliver a more robust 6.0.2 version.
I wanted to record the noticed incompatibility of working with a project outside the System & Application drive and applying Quartz composer effects.
Most keen videographers are using either a good large size external drive, a RAID array or a separate partition to store their video footage and editing work. So the noticed incompatibility needs to be looked into.
Interestingly, I read of other users having the same problem but Karl Petersen also mentionned that he didn't have the problem ...
So, what's wrong ? If the problem would be consistent, it would be easy to have Apple on their toes to fix it, but if not ...
So I ran a small experiment. I took the same iMovie project and copied it to my different disks and volumes (at least the ones where I had enough space) and tested 3 types of effects:
-1- the non-Quartz Composer 'fast/slow/reverse' effect, which caused me trouble already in iMovie '05;
-2- the Quartz Composer 'sepia tone' effect, which I was using without problem in the previous version;
-3- the non-Quartz Composer 'aged film' effect, which I was using without problem in the previous version;
My disk and volume configuration is the following:
-> First internal 500GB Serial ATA Disk split into 3 partitions:
a) 30GB System & Applications Drive (Start-up Disk);
b) 20GB Pictures Drive;
c) 415.6GB Partition as Slice 1 of my Apple RAID array;
-> Second internal 500GB Serial ATA Disk split into 4 partitions:
d) 15GB Virtual PC System & Applications Drive;
e) 15GB MAC & PC Documents Drive;
f) 20GB Musics Drive;
g) 415.6GB Partition as Slice 2 of my Apple RAID array;
-> Internal 831.3GB Apple RAID Array - striped RAID set made of 2 slices (volumes c and g above);
-> External 120GB FireWire Disk in one volume.
All volumes are formated using Mac OS Extended (Journaled) format.
The result is consistent and points towards an incompatibility of iMovie with either very large size volume or RAID array. Indeed, all tested effects preview fine on all tested volumes, however, they can be applied seemlessly on all tested volumes apart for my large size RAID array.
When the project is on the RAID array, hitting the apply button results in the following:
For the non-Quartz Composer 'fast/slow/reverse' effect and the Quartz Composer 'sepia tone' effect, rendering starts but then stops a fraction of a second later (as if it was unable to write the rendered file to disk). Resulting image in the video viewer is shifted diagonally to leave a black corner on the bottom-left.
For the non-Quartz Composer 'aged film' effect, rendering starts and proceeds but the resulting image in the video viewer is again shifted diagonally to leave a black corner on the bottom-left. Note that resizing the iMovie window corrects this viewer issue.
Conclusion:
Is iMovie designed to support large sire RAID disk arrays ?
Could anybody test a non-RAID array large size (say 500GB or better 1000GB) volume to check if it is size or RAID dependent ?
When can we expect a fix ?
Regards,
Alex

I had the same problem rendering a movie with iMovie 6 when the file is placed on a second internal disk.
Clicking the 'Ignore ownership on this volume' tick box is a solution but I find it too blunt. My Mac is configured as a multiuser system and I bought the second internal disk to use it for my /Users directory. I thus don't want the different users to be able to create files in each others directories.
When unclicking the 'Ignore ownership on this volume' tick box again I'm surprised to find that rendering still works fine for all users with the desired file integrity.
I would have preferred to set up all the permissions using unix commands instead of all this magic. Can anyone explain the proper way to configure the correct permissions using the Terminal?
Power Mac G5 DP 1.8GHz Mac OS X (10.4.5)

Oracle and volume- and disk array-based replication?

Dear mighty all,
here is a situation:
Location A - active Oracle database + volume replication software + geocluster software
Location B - standby location, i.e. standby database + volume replication software + geocluster
Oracle is 10g
The size of the database is 500 GB+
The daily updates are roughly 2-3%.
The comm channel between locations can have any reasonable bandwidth, however the jitter and latency cannot be guaranteed (i.e. no synchronous replication).
This is a matter of protecting against a disaster (such as a complete destruction of Location A).
The task is to make sure that Location B has the up-to-date data (RPO is 8 hours) and Oracle database can be started automatcially without any manual intervention. (I.e. cluster administrator pushes the button and the rest is done without human intervention).
Here is what I am thinking of:
1) volume replication software usually observes the atomicity on the disk block level. I.e. it is impossible that the data block being updated on the volume in Location A is updated in location B incompletely.
2) When the database in Location A completes a transaction it writes data to the disk thus initiating the series of disk block updates being sent to Location B.
3) From the database point of view, the transaction is completed, database files are updated.
4) However there is a slim chance of Location A being destroyed while:
* the volume replication software has started pushing through to Location B the updated disk blocks representing the completed transaction
* but it did not finish transmitting the whole lot of disk updates (boom! the asteroid fell on Location A)
* and volume replicator in Location B cannot roll back the disk updates since volume replicator does not know of the database transaction
5) Volume replicator atomicity is disk data block while Oracle's atomictity is transaction (i.e. there cannot be a half-transaction applied)
6) Thus, when we start Oracle in Location B, we will get inconsistent database, since the last transaction was transferred to Location B incompletely
7) Sure that there is a way to fix this using various DBA tools, but that defies the whole purpose of automatic start
So, my question is:
1) Is volume- or disk array-based replication not a good idea in this case at all?
2) or is there a way to nonetheless ensure the consistency of the database (say start it every time in the recovery mode)?
3) Or should I dump the idea of replicating Oracle with volume replication and switch to DataGuard? (The cluster software can handle DataGuard).
thanks a million for your answers, ye mighty all!

Hi,
this is not a "typical" question what is easy to discuss in a forum.
Just some hints:
1. using volume replication won't help you against logical or physical corruption
2. RPO of 8 hours ? Sounds a lot regarding a change rate of 10-15 GB a day.
3. 100% Automation is normally not a good idea in a database disaster scenario
( a false disaster detection can end in a real disaster!) I've already seen too much databases which had been totally corrupted by a false switch.

Mounting Solaris 10 concatenated disk array?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for