MOVED: Killer e2200 LAN very slow

This topic has been moved to MSI Notebooks & Netbooks.
https://forum-en.msi.com/index.php?topic=177276.0

Microfilter Connected to Test Socket. Quiet test Digital 'phone= very very slight noise.
speedtest.net:- Ping 15, DL = 5.67, UP =0.93,
ADSL Line Status
Connection Information
Line state:
Connected
Connection time:
0 days, 00:06:48
Downstream:
6.461 Mbps
Upstream:
1.129 Mbps
ADSL Settings
VPI/VCI:
0/38
Type:
PPPoA
Modulation:
G.992.5 Annex A
Latency type:
Fast
Noise margin (Down/Up):
6.1 dB / 5.7 dB
Line attenuation (Down/Up):
39.5 dB / 20.0 dB
Output power (Down/Up):
19.9 dBm / 12.5 dBm
FEC Events (Down/Up):
0 / 0
CRC Events (Down/Up):
361 / 43
Loss of Framing (Local/Remote):
0 / 0
Loss of Signal (Local/Remote):
0 / 0
Loss of Power (Local/Remote):
0 / 0
HEC Events (Down/Up):
650 / 156
Error Seconds (Local/Remote):
1957 / 175

Similar Messages

Moving table columns is very slow

In my application moving table columns is very slow, with the rendering of table cells dragging behind the rendering of the table cell (using Java 1.5). I use a custom table cell renderer that subclasses a JPanel and contains a JTextField.
I checked I was overriding all the methods that DefaultTableCellRenderer does for performance reasons and found I wasnt overiding validate() and invalidate(), over-riding these the table column performance is now ok, but the cells are now not rendered correctly.
I also put a System.out.println into getTableRendererComponent() and found that even if I only move a column slightly the getTableRendererComponent() is called for every cell displayed rather than just the cells within the column moved/columns either side of it which is what i expect.
Any ideas what i should do. My own vague idea is to put some code into validate() and invalidate() to only call super implemntaions when really need to, but dont know how to work this out.

Hi, thanks for your help - ive created a full test case, code below. I have reworked the code so I dont need to do a removeAll() but the issues remaining are:
1. If I override validate() with an empty method nothing is displayed in the grid
2. The renderer is alot slower than the using default renderer even though ive removed stuff like borders.
The code below has validate without the empty method.
(My real renderer is a bit more complicated, and I do require to use a JPanel)
import com.jthink.jaikoz.settings.LAF;
import com.jthink.jaikoz.table.ID3Cell;
import javax.swing.*;
import javax.swing.table.*;
import java.util.Vector;
import java.awt.*;
public class SlowColumnMoveTest
    public static void main(String args[])
        new SlowColumnMoveTest();
    public SlowColumnMoveTest()
        Vector colNames = new Vector();
        colNames.add("col0");
        colNames.add("col1");
        colNames.add("col2");
        colNames.add("col3");
        colNames.add("col4");
        colNames.add("col5");
        colNames.add("col6");
        colNames.add("col7");
        colNames.add("col8");
        colNames.add("col9");
        Vector data = new Vector();
        for (int i = 0; i < 500; i++)
            Vector v = new Vector();
            v.add(i);
            for (int j = 1; j < 10; j++)
                v.add(String.valueOf((i + 1) * (j + 1)));
            data.add(v);
        JTable table = new JTable(new DefaultTableModel(data, colNames));
        table.getColumnModel().setColumnSelectionAllowed(true);
        table.setDefaultRenderer(Object.class, new SlowRenderer());
        JFrame frame = new JFrame("SlowColumnMoveTest");
        frame.setDefaultCloseOperation(JFrame.DISPOSE_ON_CLOSE);
        JScrollPane scrollPane = new JScrollPane(table);
        frame.add(scrollPane);
        frame.pack();
        frame.setVisible(true);
    static class SlowRenderer extends JPanel implements TableCellRenderer
        private static String PROPERTY_TABLE_BGCOLOUR = "Table.background";
        private static String PROPERTY_TABLE_FGCOLOUR = "Table.foreground";
        private static String PROPERTY_TABLE_SELECTION_BGCOLOUR = "Table.selectionBackground";
        private static String PROPERTY_TABLE_SELECTION_FGCOLOUR = "Table.selectionForeground";
        protected static Color tableBGColour = null;
        protected static Color tableFGColour = null;
        protected static Color selectionBGColour = null;
        protected static Color selectionFGColour = null;
        static
            tableBGColour = UIManager.getColor(PROPERTY_TABLE_BGCOLOUR);
            tableFGColour = UIManager.getColor(PROPERTY_TABLE_FGCOLOUR);
            selectionBGColour = UIManager.getColor(PROPERTY_TABLE_SELECTION_BGCOLOUR);
            selectionFGColour = UIManager.getColor(PROPERTY_TABLE_SELECTION_FGCOLOUR);
        protected JTextField text;
        public SlowRenderer()
            text = new JTextField();
            text.setBorder(null);
            text.setOpaque(false);
            text.setForeground(tableFGColour);
            setOpaque(true);
            this.setLayout(new BoxLayout(this, BoxLayout.X_AXIS));
            this.add(text);
        public Component getTableCellRendererComponent(final JTable table,
                                                       final Object value,
                                                       final boolean isSelected,
                                                       final boolean hasFocus,
                                                       final int row,
                                                       final int column)
            //System.out.println("rendering:col:"+column+":row:"+row);
            text.setVisible(true);
            text.setText(value.toString());
            if (isSelected)
                text.setForeground(selectionFGColour);
                this.setBackground(selectionBGColour);
            else
                text.setForeground(tableFGColour);
                this.setBackground(tableBGColour);
            return this;
        @Override
        public final boolean isOpaque()
            return true;
        @Override
        public void invalidate()
            //System.out.println("invvalidate");
            //super.invalidate();
        @Override
        public void validate()
            //System.out.println("validate");
            super.validate();
        @Override
        public void revalidate()
        @Override
        public void repaint(long tm, int x, int y, int width, int height)
        @Override
        public void repaint(Rectangle r)
        @Override
        public void repaint()
        @Override
        protected final void firePropertyChange(final String propertyName, final Object oldValue, final Object newValue)
        @Override
        public final void firePropertyChange(final String propertyName, final boolean oldValue, final boolean newValue)
        private static final class UIResource
            extends DefaultTableCellRenderer
            implements javax.swing.plaf.UIResource
}

Moving files in Lr - very slow

I'm sure this has been discussed before, but the search on "move" does not return anything.
My issue: moving files between folders (on the same drive) seems to be very slow in Lr. Is there anyway to improve performance. The current performance I am seeing, often 20-30 seconds to move a file, is unworkable. I am trying to reorganize a significant number of files, which are also in collections.
OS: Vista
Computer: Dell quad core
Disk file indexing = off
Thanks in advance
Rory

I too find most of the usual operations--move, copy, make new folder ,etc, inordinately slow compared to using a file browser, or photo browser, such as Bridge. I do a lot of that, but not in LR, unless it is just the odd image that needs moving as I am working.
Better off doing that on the outside, and then resynching the directories, or even the entire collection (while you eat dinner) to make sure the db is kept up to date reflecting your moves.

IMac G4 800 mhz internet access via LAN very slow

We have a G4 800mhz running 10.3. Memory is 768K. The only use for this machine is as a music server. It is connected to the internet via LAN; internet access is extremely slow - pages take an incredibly long time to load. Download/Upload speeds are about the same as I see on my Macbook Pro so I don't think it is the connected to the internet. Is there anything one can do to troubleshoot very laggy browser performance?

You may need to turn to Activity Monitor (or "AM") in Applications > Utilities to see if a runaway background process is eating up processor cycles. If you've not run AM before, on first launch its "Show" window defaults to "My Processes." That will tell only part of the story. Change it to "All Processes"to get the full picture.
Now highlight the "%CPU" column to sort by processor usage. Best to check with no user apps running other than AM. Let AM percolate five to ten seconds to let it finish its first poll. What you are looking for are any processes that are using 15 percent or more of "%CPU" with nothing running other than AM. If you find one, post its name here and we can advise how to deal with it.
However, don't get your expectations too high that a process has gone rogue. Part of it is simply a lack of speed by today's standards. I recently upgraded a friends iMac G4 800 from Panther to Tiger so it could run the latest browsers and it was still terribly slow compared to my PowerBook G4 1Ghz running the same level OS. The iMac 800 has a slow logic board bus (100mHz).

MOVED: Killer e2200 NIC causing BSOD

This topic has been moved to MSI Intel boards.
https://forum-en.msi.com/index.php?topic=184371.0

if you disable the killer LAN card, do you have BSODs?
what are the exact BSODs error codes?
what is your current bios version?
have you done >>Clear CMOS Guide<< with power cord removed, then to retest?

Wifi LAN VERY slow on mac mini 10.6.8

All,
I have a mac mini 1.66 intel core Duo with 2gb of RAM. The HD crashed a couple months ago and so it has a clean version of 10.6.8 on it.
In my house I have a Motorola modem (comcast) hooked to a vonage box with wifi. Off this we run 2 MBP's a wifi printer, and the Mini.
Both MBP's will get 10mb down and 3-5mb up on speedtest.net.
The Mini will get .9 down and .7 or so up. It also became non-responsive using VNC to control it, so it's not so much that the internet is slow, but more that it just isn't connecting to the LAN with any speed. It is connected to my router (no security) with a signal/noise of -75/-98 and a transmit rate of 48.
I had shared my Dish Network box out via ethernet (airport sharing to ethernet) and had done the terminal prompt fix which is found all over the net to allow DHCP on internet sharing. However, it doesn't matter if I turn off internet sharing, the local speeds are still just terribly slow.
This is a big problem since it's used as our media center for streaming netflix, etc...
Any help? Where to start?
Thanks,

If reinstalling doesn't help, you'll probably need to contact Macroplant support:
http://www.macroplant.com/contact.php
Regards.

Killer e2200 lan driver file not available

I have searched the forum and tried the method suggested by the senior member for the driver without the suite, and re installing it using the cleaner but it says installation failed

Hi thanks for your reply,
it seems i have two threads running same issue.
I have MSI GT70 20C 065 US.
I searched it up on this forum the method suggested by senior member, with the link to download the Killer cleaner as well as the driver without the suite.
Went step by step as mentioned, but after all the process it says failed to installed something like that.

MSI Z87 GD65 ATX Killer NIC Suddenly Very Slow.

I just completed my build today and was doing the usual downloading updates installed drivers etc, everything was going great the speeds were awesome but now they dropped and I mean through the floor. I made sure before I even got the motherboard to go on the MSI website and download all the drivers for everything for it. Does anyone have any advice on what I should do to fix this I would of checked Killers site but there site has apparently imploded.

If the problem occurs again you can just try uninstalling everything and install this driver via device manager.
https://forum-en.msi.com/index.php?topic=174229.0

AE CS4 on OSX 10.5 Very Slow, Makes System Unresponsive

This is very frustrating, our company has been fighting this problem since we upgraded. I work for a major broadcaster which uses AE for all our motion graphics work. Since upgrading to CS4 we've experienced a team wide decrease in productivity. AE CS4 renders slower than CS3 and in some cases will completely lock up the computer when rendering, making it impossible to do any sort of simple multitasking. Even switching to the Finder and moving around windows is very slow. Let alone try to use Safari or type into a TextEdit document. We've tried everything, but details first.
We're running on last-gen 8-core 3.2GHz Mac Pro's. Each has 10GB of ram and 1TB of HD space (mostly empty). NVidia GeForce 8800 GT video card. Runing AE 9.0.2.42)
We realize that 10GB is not enough ram to use all 8 processors at full speed. So AE is set to use multiprocessing with a max of 3 cores with 2GB minimum with 2 GB in reserve for other applications. All the work we do is with HD footage. All footage is delivered in Apple Prores. Any comp of medium or greater complexity will completely slow down the system. When comparing CS3 rendering time to CS4, CS4 seems about 30-40% slower. When rendering CS4 will also completely lock up the system, switching windows is a complete pain. We've tried turing on and off OpenGL in AE, but no change. We're tried every combination of settings we can think of. Rendering without multiprocessing is even slower and still locks up the system. Also in Activity Monitor is will often show only limited CPU useage (see attached screen). You can see I'm running multiple aeselflink instances, but each one is no where near 100 and the system is still unresponsive!
Outside of rendering CS4 also is much more unresponsive when just working (not rendering). Moving clips around in the composition window and navigating the timeline are sometimes a chore, with lots of 1-2 second delays before taking the action. Or slow screen updates.
Any ideas what is happening here? If is something with the change from 32-bit to 64-bit. Will more ram fix it or is there something else going on? This is becoming a very frustrating situations where we have to completely restart the computer and make sure no other apps are running before even trying to render our anything. CS3 did not seem to have these problems, even with multiprocessing turned on at it's default settings. We like many of the new features in CS4 and are practically required to use it because we get a lot of projects from vendors, but it's proving very slow to work in.

I don't know how complex your comps are, but our are usually pretty complex. Simple comps with just text and 1-2 layers of video usually go pretty quick, but as soon as you ramp up complexity it slows way down. I somehow don't think that our graphics card is the problem. Most of the plugins we use do not see any benefit from OpenGL and we don't use that many 3D layers. In general we haven't seen a big boost in AE performance with OpenGL on or off. All our footage sits on a super fast Terrablock system with at least 300-400mb/s sequential read speeds. Then again it could be that AE just runs poorly on Macs.
Adolfo - we have done some quite extensive benchmarks with all our machines here. Configuring both 10GB and 16GB versions (we have not tried higher memory yet). We tested the same comp in both CS3 and CS$ with various multiprocessor settings. Our test file's complexity was indicative of the kind of projects we do. Around 30 layers, a mix of TGA sequences with alpha, QuickTimes with alpha (animation) and ProRes footage. Many layers with ReelSmart Motion Blur. A Knoll Light Factory lens flare. A mix of layers with various blurs and color correction and some transfer modes.
As you can see CS3 was much, much quicker at rendering the project. In some cases almost twice as fast as CS4. Also, strangely CS3 ran better limited to 4 processors in both the 10GB and 16GB configurations.
Benchmark Test File
CS3 Benchmarks
[note - CS3 has no options in the app for adjusting multi-processor settings. All edits had to be made in the pref file.]
10GB System -----------------
AE CS3
10GB
4 Processors
12m 43s
[note - This was the most optimized setting for CS3 which gave the best performance for us.]
AE CS3
10BG
8 Processors
24m 8s
[note - Default setting in AE CS3 for multiprocessor. System is completely unusable during render.]
16GB System -----------------
AE CS3
16GB
4 Processors
11m 54s
[note - This was the optimized setting for CS3 which gave the best performance. Each instance of the program was using 150-180 CPU in the activity monitor so it must be using more that 4 processors with this setting. Each processor used more memory than in the 10GB config.]
AE CS3
16GB
7 Processors
16m 15s
AE CS3
16BG
8 Processors
20m 13s
[note - Default setting in AE CS3 for multiprocessor. System is completely unusable during render.]
CS4 Benchmarks
In general CS4 is about half the speed of an optimized CS3. Going from 10GB to 16GB of memory gained us about 33% performance increase in the most optimized setting (4-6 processors at 2GB+ per processor).
10GB System -----------------
AE CS4
10GB total RAM
8GB reserved for AE (2GB reserved for OS)
3 Processors (2GB per processor)
24m 7s
[note - Computer response pretty slow]
AE CS4
10GB total RAM
8GB reserved for AE (2GB reserved for OS)
7 Processors (.9GB per processor)
28m 10s
[note - Computer completely unusable while rendering]
16GB System -----------------
AE CS4
16GB total RAM
8GB reserved for AE (8GB reserved for OS)
3 Processors (2GB per processor)
22m 57s
AE CS4
16GB total RAM
13GB reserved for AE (3GB reserved for OS)
4 Processors (2.33+ GB per processor)
18m 7s
AE CS4
16GB total RAM
13GB reserved for AE (3GB reserved for OS)
6 Processors (2.09 GB/Processor)
19m 1s
AE CS4
16GB total RAM
14GB reserved for AE (2GB reserved for OS)
7 Processors (1.85GB/Processor)
23m 4s
[note - This config made system very slow, left very little memory for the system.]
AE CS4
16GB total RAM
13GB reserved for AE (3GB reserved for OS)
7 Processors (1.59GB/Processor)
25m 50s

Since moving to a new location Foxfire is very slow

I have recently moved and since that time Foxfire is very slow and hesitant. I have rebooted and everything I know to do. Can you please help me?

Launch the Console application in any of the following ways:
☞ Enter the first few letters of its name into a Spotlight search. Select it in the results (it should be at the top.)
☞ In the Finder, select Go ▹ Utilities from the menu bar, or press the key combination shift-command-U. The application is in the folder that opens.
☞ Open LaunchPad. Click Utilities, then Console in the icon grid.
Make sure the title of the Console window is All Messages. If it isn't, select All Messages from the SYSTEM LOG QUERIES menu on the left. If you don't see that menu, select
View ▹ Show Log List
from the menu bar.
Click the Clear Display icon in the toolbar. Then try the action that you're having trouble with again. Select any messages that appear in the Console window. Copy them to the Clipboard by pressing the key combination command-C. Paste into a reply to this message (command-V).
When posting a log extract, be selective. In most cases, a few dozen lines are more than enough.
Please do not indiscriminately dump thousands of lines from the log into this discussion.
Important: Some private information, such as your name, may appear in the log. Anonymize before posting.

My computer has been getting the pin wheel and moving very slow since the i downloaded yosemite

Whenever i have a video playing from my internet browser it causes my computer to pin wheel and go into thinking mode with all of my apps that are open. It moves very slow and i have to force quit everything and reboot my computer to make it act normal. this all started after the software update. Any suggestions>

Mine has been moving extremely slow, too. I had a problem downloading and installing Yosemite and after many conversations with Apple Care, the solution was to remove the 3rd party RAM I had just installed prior to the upgrade. That solved the download/install problem, but now it's slow as anything. I opened my activity monitor and sure enough, the memory pressure is at full load so I have to install more memory. The trick is to make sure it's truly compatible.
Have you checked your activity monitor's memory report?

Crystal Reports Moved from one file server to another - very slow opening

Hello,
I am new here, and I am in need of a solution. If I am not in the correct forum, please advise.
Our crystal reports were moved from an old file server to a new file server. Once the old file server was shut down the reports opened very slow in Designer and in our 3rd party application. Our server team determined that the reports are still attempting to connect to the old file server. If the old file server is brought online or dns is changed to reflect another machine that it can make a connection to, it opens with no delay.
For some reason, not every report is affected. Most of the reports are Crystal 8.5, but I have some Crystal XI reports that do the same thing. I can't find any reference in the reports to any file server/location....
I need to resolve this issue on the Crystal 8.5 version due to the application that we are running.
Is there a way to fix this other than to recreate the reports (I have over 400 of them)?
Any assistance or advice is appreciated!
Thanks,
Nancy

Hi Nancy,
The server info still needs to be updated. Are you setting location for each subreport also?
Possibly this registry key will help, I only have CR 2008 installed so you'll have adjust for what ever you are using:
HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Business Objects\Suite 12.0\Crystal Reports\DatabaseOptions - VerifyStoredProceduresOnFirstRefresh = No
and
VerifyStoredProceduresOnSetLocation = No
And
VerifyWhenDBDriverUpgraded = No
And
ViewOutOfPlaceSubreports = No
Close CR designer before making any changes. And the usual warning about modifying the registry.
Thank you
Don

ARD 3.7.2 very slow connection on Lan

I'm running ARD 3.7.2 on MacBook Air (OSX 10.9.2) to connect mac mini (8gb / osx 10.9.2) very slow connection on LAN.
Mini connected to LAN 100Mbit Ethernet, MacBook connection is wi-fi

Ok, I solved it after doing some extensive Google searching. Still not sure why ARD went bonkers, but here's my fix.
1. Download the ARD 3.7.1 client drom the Apple downloads page and install it manually on the client machine.
2. Go back to the administrator machine and delete the computer client from the computers list.
3. From the scanners list, find the now visible client machine (it will probably say "no user name or password" next to it) and drag it to the computer list.
4. When you drag it over it will ask for the username and password. Fill in an administrator user name and password for that computer, click OK and you're done.
Still a mystery as to why ARD software itself will not create new client packages. I still haven't figured that part out. Downloading the standard client package from Apple is the only work around I know of so far. Good luck.

Moving files between folders is very slow

Hi, I have an iMac 2011. Processor: 2.7GHz Intel Core i5/ Memory 4GB
OS X Yosemite, version 10.10.1
After I change my OS from Mavericks to Yosemite, moving files between folders is very slow.
For example, if I move one jpg file in Desktop to Pictures folder (or just any other folders like Trash), it takes about 3 seconds.
When I was still using Mavericks, it made that Ding sound and transferred files right away. However, now, although it makes the Ding sound right away, the file is still there for 3 seconds.
I tried to clean up my mac using many apps, but they never fixed this problem.
I've also tried what I saw on this one thread. OS X File Transfers Very Slow
Go->Connect to Server then type "cifs://server-address" but it says there is a problem and did nothing. (maybe different issue)
Please help!

There may be other issues, but you installed the "Genieo" or "InstallMac" ad-injection malware. Follow the instructions on this Apple Support page to remove it.
Back up all data before making any changes.
Besides the files listed in the linked support article, you may also need to remove this file in the same way:
~/Library/LaunchAgents/com.genieo.completer.ltvbit.plist
If there are other items with a name that includes "Genieo" or "genieo" alongside any of those you find, remove them as well.
One of the steps in the article is to remove malicious Safari extensions. Do the equivalent in the Chrome and Firefox browsers, if you use either of those. If Safari crashes on launch, skip that step and come back to it after you've done everything else.
If you don't find any of the files or extensions listed, or if removing them doesn't stop the ad injection, then you may have one of the other kinds of adware covered by the support article. Follow the rest of the instructions in the article.
Make sure you don't repeat the mistake that led you to install the malware. Chances are you got it from an Internet cesspit such as "Softonic" or "CNET Download." Never visit either of those sites again. You might also have downloaded it from an ad in a page on some other site. The ad would probably have included a large green button labeled "Download" or "Download Now" in white letters. The button is designed to confuse people who intend to download something else on the same page. If you ever download a file that isn't obviously what you expected, delete it immediately.
In the Security & Privacy pane of System Preferences, select the General tab. The radio button marked Anywhere should not be selected. If it is, click the lock icon to unlock the settings, then select one of the other buttons. After that, don't ignore a warning that you are about to run or install an application from an unknown developer.
Still in System Preferences, open the App Store or Software Update pane and check the box marked
Install system data files and security updates
if it's not already checked.

Very slow lan!

Hello to all. first of all sorry for my bad english.
my configuration is:
Mac Pro 1,1
2 x xeon 2 ghz
7 gb memory
8800GT
Mac osx 10.5.8
the problem is that: my network perfomance are too bad, the lan transfer (internet traffic from router to mac pro, from mac pro to printer epson trough lan) is very slow and no linear, go like a AC (see this image: http://img194.imageshack.us/img194/4758/networkt.jpg )
when there is this problem using more than one hour to print an A4 photo
to restore and dab the problem must continually undertake a maintenance application (like onyx) and run script commands and maintenance of cleanliness of the various cache. done so, turn off and reboot.
thanks for attention. have a nice day.

the router is a Netgear ProSafe DGFV338, the Mac PRO and the printer are connect with a cable (no wi-fi). i haven't this problem when using the notebook, therefore rule out a problem to the router.
yes, i have tried to power off all component.

MOVED: Killer e2200 LAN very slow

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for