Moving average price effect due to 309 mvt type

Dear Experts,
when we do stock transfer (309 mvt type ) from mat A to mat B , moving average price of A gets copied to moving average price of B if the stock of material B is zero.
If there is stock for material B, moving average price of A gets added to the stock value of B & MAP is recalculated.
Is there a way to ensure when we do material stock transfer, same MAP price is also captured. please suggest.

>
Mathew John wrote:
> After transferring the material from A to B, then moving average price will change for both the materials.
>
> So if you want to change the MAP, use the t-code MR21 and make the changes. Difference amount will be debited and credited in PRD account.
for what reason should the price of the issuing material change?
can you proof what you wrote?

Similar Messages

  • Dump Error due to high moving average  price

    Hi,
    When processing transaction KO88 settlement reversal, gives a dump error -   Overflow when converting from "1.13405e+09".In my opinion this error came because the stock value was very high that the caluclated price could not be stored on the database.
    Moving average price was reduced but of no much use.  Price unit can be reduced but what could be it's implications.

    >
    Mathew John wrote:
    > After transferring the material from A to B, then moving average price will change for both the materials.
    >
    > So if you want to change the MAP, use the t-code MR21 and make the changes. Difference amount will be debited and credited in PRD account.
    for what reason should the price of the issuing material change?
    can you proof what you wrote?

  • Moving average price not calculated properly

    Hi,
    For a consumable material moving average price(MAP) is getting calculated wrongly.
    There are 2 goods receipts taken in Jan'08 and Feb'08 at a unit price of 1250 and 1450 INR.
    Then there are around 10 Goods issues for a cost centre, Mvt type 201 taken for next few months.
    The MAP value has been calculated properly after the Goods issues.
    Again there was a goods recipt in Oct'08 for 1275 INR.
    The goods issue done in Nov'08 has created a problem and it has calculated  wronlgy i.e. instead of Rs. 800, the system has calculated issue price as Rs.3500.
    No value has been changed in MR21. No PO's has been created between these days.
    Can anyone help us...??
    Regards,
    Ramya

    Hi Ramya,
    You have informed in your thread that "for a consumable material..", If a material is procured for direct consumption, the consumption accounts in Financial Accounting are posted when the goods receipt is entered . The total quantity and value of existing stocks of the material are not affected. There is no Goods Issue.
    Now, if you procure the material for stock, then changes in Material Valuation due to goods receipts and invoice receipts are carried out automatically (ofcourse manually also) when the relevant transaction is posted.
    The extent to which the stock value changes depends on the sequence in which the goods receipts and invoice receipts are posted. The SAP System allows for both possibilities:
    - When goods are received before the invoice, the stipulations in the purchase order are used as the basis for posting.
    - When the invoice is received before the goods, the details on the invoice are used as the basis for posting.
    So, please look into the Invoices and the relevant GR/IR clearing account details. You may get a clue there.
    Regards,
    Narayana.

  • Updation of Moving Average Price

    Dear Experts,
    My MM period is open for 2 months (i.e for July and August Now) . One of our raw material is Limestone.
    From July 1st there were several Receipts and Issues of limestone in SAP.
    In August 9th our survey team found that in our stock we have 25000 TON limestone excess. (Due to Callibiration error)
    i.e If the current stock in system was 10000  TON the real Physical stock in storage was 10000 + 25000 TON.
    We have created a Free of Cost PO for 25000 TON to account the excess quantity of Limestone in Stock.
    MIGO Goods Receipt for the Free of Cost PO was done on 31.07.2011.
    Because of the extra 25000 TON Free of Cost Limestone Receipt the Moving Average Price of the Material got Updated. (But only from 09-August-2011 not from 31-July-2011)
    I want system to calculate the new moving average price and update all the documents posted from 31-July-2011. MY MM period is not closed.
    Is it possible to do so and how. Please Help.
    Thanks

    Hi
    The physical inventory is carried out on the basis of stock management units.A stock management unit is a non-divisible part of a stock of materials for which a seperate book inventory exists.A stock management unit is uniquely defined by
    Material
    Plant,storage location
    Stock type
    Batch
    Special Stock
    Each stock management unit of a material is counted seperately,and the inventory diffreneces are posted per stock management unit.
    The physical inventory process comprises three phases
    1)Creation of physical inventory documents(MI01)
    2)Entry of Count(MI04)
    3)Posting the difference(MI07)
    1)In the first phase ,you create the physical inventory documents.SAP systems provide several procedures for mass-generation of PI documents.After selecting the stocks to be counted and creating the PI documents,you print out the documents in order to start the counting process.A physical inventory document cotains data that include
    >The plant and storage location in which the count has to take place
    >The date on which the count has to take place
    >The materials to be counted
    >the stock types to be counted
    >The status of the item
    >The status of the PI document
    When creating a PI document,you can specify a physical inventory nuber in the document header.This physical inventory number facilitates selection of the PI documents to be processed during entry of the count data,posting the diffrences, and in evaluations.
    2)Entering the physical inventory count:For the physical inventory count,you must print out the PI document and forward it to persons responsible for the count.You can enter the stock figures in the system with and without reference to a PI document.When entering the physical inventory count,you can enter a percentage variance of the count quantity from the book inventory,above which the system issues a warning message.
    3)You can post the inventory diffrences either via list of differences or via seperate transactions.When an inventory difference is posted,the system creates a material document and corrects the stock figures,and an accounting document recording the necessary accounting movements.
    Hope this will be helpful for you.
    Regards,
    Sandesh Sawant

  • Moving average price becomes negative

    Dear all,
    I have read several threads about this subject but my scenario is a little bit different than the ones described so far:
    1 - I had a GR of 12 Tons for 2000 u20AC for material A
    2 - Product A had several production consumptions (movement 261) with the correct MAP
    3 - My user has accidently posted the invoice for 2000 u20AC, but for a quantity of 12 Kg. This caused a change in the moving average price, causing the following consumptions (261) to be wrong. This posting was done in January (already closed) but only detected now, unfortunately.
    4 - We have found the message when the user detected the mistake and tried to cancel the invoice.
    As we have dozens of consumptions of this product and dozens of sales orders of the finished product (for which product A was a component), I was thinking of making a value change in MR21 for component A, so that the following consumptions would be correct. And correct the MAP of the finished products, so that the cost of sales is corrected from now on.
    I would also forget about canceling the invoice.
    Can you tell me if this is the correct approach recommended by SAP? Has any of you faced similar issues that has a better solution?
    Thanks in advance,
    JL

    Option 1 : You have to cancel all the documents last come First to Nullify the effect.( Which I feel the best practice may be bit tedious). And do the postings as required.
    Option 2 : Do Manipulate with Movement type 561, means just Put 1 kg or .1 kg with very high value to mitigate the MAV value.
    Option 3 : You can go for MR21.

  • Moving Average Price for Batch Maintenance

    Hi Experts,
          I've created material of which stock is maintain in batch (Valuation category = X & Price Control = V).
        Due to batch wise stock, system calculates the moving average price for different batches.
        Can we calculate moving average price at plant level inspite of maintaining material batch wise?
       Is there any other way by defining multiple storage bins for that material so that I can see the stock value differently with single moving average price value?
       Thanks.
                                                   Naimish.

    In MM03, you get the overall MAP for all batches of the material at plant level without mentioning valuation type in org. level. When specific valuation type is given, you can see its MAP / std price.
    Hope this clears the doubt.
    Regards,
    SAmeer

  • Moving Average Price-calculation

    Dear All,
    Can anybody explain about the Calculation of Moving average price of the material  in case of 309 movement i.e. Material to Material Transfer.
    Thanks and Regards,
    Girish

    Hi there!
    At 309 movement type (materia to materia transfer), moving average of receiving material is calculated as:
    Existing value of receiving material (existing stock x existing moving average price)    +   value of units transferred (units of sender material x MAP of sender material)     /     (Existing units of receiving material + units transferred)
    Please revert if more explanation required
    Regards

  • Moving average price in case of semifinished product.

    Dear All,
    Our client wants to go for moving average price in case of semifinished material, which is supposed to be normally standard price against our advice. The problem is that MAP is not getting updated after the GR against the production order. What settings I need to check in cusomization from PP point of view to solve this problem. Ideally the summation of cost of raw materials has to be the cost of semifinished material.
    I did the settlement and the MAP got updated. There are few questions I want to ask u are?
    1. What MAP should I keep when I create the semifinished material for the first time?
    2. What the base to calculate the target cost in production order? Currently the target cost is zero for that the varience is huge which will be going to affect the MAP in a big manner after setllement? What should I do in that case?
    Ur valuable inputs are awaited at the earliest. It's very very urgent.

    Hi
    There will not any big problem if your client insists upon MAP for the material instead of your suggestio for having S as per std. SAP suggestions. There will not be any change in material price during confirmation if you have V indicator but if you have S as indicator there will be change in price due to costing and settlement. It is not that system will not do anything for the materials having V indicator, check the field value for Standard price , it gets updated. Your costing calculation completely depends uopn the settings that has been customised in OPN2 i.e the settings available for valuation. You cancompletely control all these.
    Pirce for your semifinished  should include the inputs to it and any other parameters which you would like to add. You can always change the price manually with MR21 if you have Zero stock.
    Best Regards

  • SAP allows release of Standard Cost for Material with Moving Average Price

    Hi
    We set our Raw Material to use Moving Average Price (V) and price determination 2 (single level). And we activated material ledger.
    During mass calculation of standard cost (CK40N), If user accidentally forgot to restrict the Raw Material for being included in calculation, the system calculate standard cost anyway, even though I set it as Moving Average Price. And user is able to release it too without any problem.
    Why the system does not restrict it? By giving error maybe. Although as for now I can not find the wrong effect from releasing standard cost for MAP material, by your experience, is there any side effect that I should be aware of?
    Thanks

    CK40n is mass release of all materials. The release is not dependent on price indicator of the material in the master. It will calculate standard cost of all the materials.
    Releasing standard cost estimate of raw materials does not have any side effect as long your calculation is based on moving average price.
    Regards
    Divraj

  • Change Moveing average price in MIGO Goods Reciept through user exit

    Hi,
    i need to change the moving average price in the MIGO transaction  (Goods Issue) through user exit can any one help me with user exit.

    Hi,
    Check these Enhancemnts...
    Exit Name           Description
    V02V0001            Sales area determination for stock transport order
    V02V0002            User exit for storage location determination
    V02V0003            User exit for gate + matl staging area determination (headr)
    V02V0004            User Exit for Staging Area Determination (Item)
    V50PSTAT            Delivery: Item Status Calculation
    V50Q0001            Delivery Monitor: User Exits for Filling Display Fields
    V50R0001            Collective processing for delivery creation
    V50R0002            Collective processing for delivery creation
    V50R0004            Calculation of Stock for POs for Shipping Due Date List
    V50S0001            User Exits for Delivery Processing
    V53C0001            Rough workload calculation in time per item
    V53C0002            W&S: RWE enhancement - shipping material type/time slot
    V53W0001            User exits for creating picking waves
    VMDE0001            Shipping Interface: Error Handling - Inbound IDoc
    VMDE0002            Shipping Interface: Message PICKSD (Picking, Outbound)
    VMDE0003            Shipping Interface: Message SDPICK (Picking, Inbound)
    VMDE0004            Shipping Interface: Message SDPACK (Packing, Inbound)
    Badi Name            Description
    DELIVERY_ADDR_SAP    Determine Time-Dependent Delivery Address in Delivery
    DELIVERY_PUBLISH     Returns BAdI Implementation: Automatic GR Posting T 2
    DELIVERY_PUBLISH     Updating of Delivery in Purchase Order
    DELIVERY_PUBLISH     AIP: Delivery Confirmation for Sales Order
    Regards
    Raghu

  • Moving average prices and std prices

    hi friends,
    i have a doubt abt prices...
    which will b assigned for raw materials-standard price? or avg moving price? and why?
    if possible explain clearly about avg.moving price and std.price
    for spit valuation what price we will use??
    help me out..
    thanks in advance...
    venkat

    Standard price are used for products that do not fluctuated frequently.  It is usually used for finished or semi finished products.
    Moving average price are used mainly for raw materials that are purchased externally.  The advantage of using moving average price for your raw materials is that your inventory costs will always reflect the current market cost.
    SAP strongly recommends that you do not select price control V for semi-finished products and finished products, because doing so will very easily cause the calculation of unrealistic valuation prices. SAP recommends: 
    Price control V for raw materials and trading goods; price control S for semi-finished products and products
    We recommend that you only use price control V for materials procured                          
    externally. Materials produced in-house should be subject to a                                 
    standard price control.                                                                        
    Generally all raw materials (ROH), spare parts (ERSA), traded goods (HAWA) etc. are assigned as moving average price (MAP)  because of the accounting practice of accurately valuating the inventory of such materials. These materials are subject to the purchase price fluctuations on a regular basis.
    The semi-finished goods (HALB) and finished products (FERT) are valuated with standard price because of the product costing angle. If these were to be MAP controlled, then finished/semi-finished product valuation would fluctuate due to data entry errors during backflushing of material and labour, production inefficiencies (higher cost) or efficiencies (lower cost). This is not a standard accounting and costing practice
    For Split valuated material it is recommended to use Moving average price

  • Affect of discount on COGS and moving average prices

    Hi experts,
    I want your suggestion to build following scenario in SAP;
    Case: During purchase order, vendor has given special discount for a material when purchased for a specific customer.
    Requirement: I need to know following;
    1. How are those specific prices could be reflected in COGS?
    2. How do those specific prices affect the moving average price? is there any way to avoid this effect in the COGS?
    Thanks

    Hi Pirzada
    Considering that you are working with material ledger system will calculate moving average price doesn´t matter the discounts conditions you had during month.
    System will revaluate all consumption considering this moving average price.
    Maybe you could think about Splliting Valuation feature ou  Make to Sales Order scenario.
    These are ways to have a specific cost using the same part number.
    Regards
    Fred

  • Material Costing: Moving Average Price Issue

    Hi Experts,
    I have a issue regarding the Moving Average Price of the Material computed by the system (indent sales process):
    The Material was created with Purchased Price .74PO Price x 10 items = 7.4 Amt in LC Posted into the system (PGR).
    But afterwards, they reversed the Material Document with the same Price .74PO Price x 10 items.
    This had been done last 2009.
    Come 2011, they created another indent sale -> PO ->PGR for this material, now the price is .12 PO Price x 10 items = 1.2 Amt in LC Posted. However, the moving average price was computed 0.77
    How does the system comes up with this computation? Is there inconsistencies in the system?

    Thanks @jurgen. I checked-double-checked in MR21, there are no change documents under the material.
    in MR51, added one Issue Document:
    Material           Material Description                     CoCd ValA
    Type DocumentNo Itm Pstng Date          Quantity BUn     Amount in LC Crcy
    2A1E8113-20        COVER SHIFT                              1100 1110
    WE   5000003540   1 25.02.2011               10- PC             1.15- SGD
    WE   5000003534   1 23.02.2011               10  PC             1.15  SGD
    WL   4900020403   5 17.09.2009               10- PC             7.35- SGD
    WE   5000001968   5 17.09.2009               10  PC             7.35  SGD
    In S_P00_07000139:
    Start date :        01.01.2009                         0  PC                   0.00  SGD
        Total goods receipt                            20 PC                   8.50 SGD
        Total goods issue                              20 PC                   8.50 SGD
    End date   :        28.02.2011                         0  PC                   0.00  SGD
    SLoc S Date       Reference Doc.   GR/GI Slip MvT           Receipt             Issue            Amount  Balance quantity Price/Unit (Bal.)    Balance amount Comment
    WH01 E 17.09.2009 PL001427         5000026286 101           10.000             0.000              7.35            10.000              0.74              7.35  GR for sales ord.st.
    WH01 E 17.09.2009 1121010049       4900227144 601            0.000            10.000              7.35-            0.000              0.00              0.00  GD delivery sls ord.
    WH01 E 23.02.2011 2002381          5000048052 101           10.000             0.000              1.15            10.000              0.12              1.15  GR for sales ord.st.
    WH01 E 25.02.2011 2002381          5000048120 102            0.000            10.000              1.15-            0.000              0.00              0.00  GR f. sls.or.st. rev
    Still it's not tallied with the MAP = .77 in Material Master.

  • Moving average price for semi finished products

    Hi
    Could anyone light on this issue,
    Our client maintain moving average price for the semi finished material, need clarification on below points
    1)  What is the advantages and disadvantages due moving average price,
    2) Which price in the material master after the production order settlement,
    3) Is there any impact of this on WIP calcaultions
    Thanks in advance
    Mohan M

    Hi
    there are no advantages of it, ONLY Dis Advantages!!!
    That will ruin your inventory valuation forever.. Consider the eg below if your price control is V
    1. Your moving price in mat master is 100 USD
    2. You Mfr on Jan 1 @ Actual cost = 110 in Prod order and Qty = 1.
    Upon GR, GR will happen @ 100 and at period end if Qty is lying in stock, 10 variance will also be inventorized
    BUT, now consider this
    1. 1. Your moving price in mat master is 100 USD
    2. You Mfr on Jan 1 @ Actual cost = 110 in Prod order and Qty = 1.
    Upon GR, GR will happen @ 100 and variance lying is 10 in prod order
    3. You Mfr on Jan 10 @ Actual cost = 110 in Prod order and Qty = 1.
    Upon GR, GR will happen @ 100 and variance lying is 10 in prod order
    4. On jan 15, you consume Qty 1 and qty lying in stock is 1
    5. In period end, when you do settlement, following will happen
    a. For prod order 1: Qty Mfd 1 and Qty lying in stock 1 - Result: variance 10 will be inventorized.
    Mvg Avg price will shoot upto 110
    b. For prod order 2: Qty Mfd 1 and Qty lying in stock 1 - Result: variance 10 will be inventorized.
    Mvg Avg price (MAP) will shoot upto 120
    System wont check whether the qty lying in stock pertains to prod order 1 or 2... It will simply check if the Qty of prod order matches with qty lying in stock. hence, it will keep on inventorizing variance in this case.... and your MAP will touch the sky
    Regards
    Ajay M

  • Abnormality in Statistical Moving Average Price

    Hi All,
    I have a material maintained with standard price "S". Statistical Moving Average Price of the material has gone abnormally after 6 months of creation of material. Thisi is causing dump in posting goods movement as the system is calculating moving average price and there is a field over flow so the screen is going to dump while posting goods movement due to some price variance.
    I have seen MBEWH and MBEW, there I saw huge variances recorded in statistical MAP of material
    Here I know there is one SAP note suggests the solution how to correct this.
    But I am concerned with route cause analysis; I have verified the following and found every thing is OK, only there are small price variances which can never cause huge abnormality in statistical moving average price.
    I have verified
    (a) Changes in Material Master MAP field
    (b) MB51 - All goods movements related to that material - No abnormal price variances
    (c) ME2M to see in any purchasing documents, if price is given in USD or Euro; but it is not so
    Is there any thing I missed, could you please suggest.
    Rgds
    Raul

    this is usually caused by the fact that the PO price was wrong at the time when the GR was posted.
    This PO price gets changed later by purchasing guys to allow posting of the invoice without variance.
    Hence you have to check PO document change history to find the PO which was adjusted in the price.
    MR51 should show you that the GR was posted with a small value. Download MR51 to Excel and calculate the MAP for each line, this will show you which one has an exceptional MAP.
    Edited by: Jürgen L. on Sep 30, 2010 7:05 PM

Maybe you are looking for

  • Built-in: Execute procedure - delete statement

    Hi, I am trying to delete rejected invoices from AP_INVOICES_INTERFACE and AP_INVOICE_LINES_INTERFACE tables each time form is opened. I am not developer so I have not access to form design, but I am allowed to use forms personalization, however I am

  • Itunes store won't load, no error message

    got a partial page one time, now nothing; internet radio loads fine, passed network diagnostics after a bit of a wait....

  • Why is iPhoto asking for keychain access to confidential Facebook "something"??

    I've recently upgraded to Lion and the newest iPhoto '11 and I keep getting a pop-up from iPhoto "iPhoto wants access confidential keychain (something) with api.Facebook" or something like that. What is this? Does anyone else have information about w

  • Offline Tablespace Backup?

    Please let me know how to take Backup of Offline Tablespace? I will be very thankful to all of you

  • SGA_TARGET Doubt

    Hi, We have Oracle 10g database, which have the following parameters. sga_max_size=1600m shared_pool_size=704m So planned to use SGA_TARGET and set the size to 2G. (ie) sga_target=2G sga_max_size=2G Do I have to comment the shared_pool_size=704m ?? R