MRP has to consider stock of Scheme and Space

Hi Experts,
I have got a new requirement at the time of planning MRP has to consider stock of Scheme (for increasing sales client has kept one plus one offer) and Space (either space is available in wm or not). It is purely MTS scenario.
Can any help me how to achieve the requirement.
Thanks in advance.
Regards
V.Sundeep
8431633761

Hello
There is no such thing as "Scheme" on MRP.
Also, MRP does not check if there is enough space on WM. An option here would be to use a lot sizing procedure with a maximum stock level.
If you want to develop your own logic, here you will find the main BAdIs available on MRP:
BAdIs for MRP
BR
Caetano

Similar Messages

Stock in Transit and MRP

Hi,
Will replenishment take into consideration the stock in transit stocks (These are from STO) not the tsock in transfer between plants..
when we ran MRP, it didnt consider the stock in transit values.
We have min/max of 10/20.
We have stock of 3,
STO from that site to DC for 36 qty open (issued out of DC but not received into stores)
Replenishment ran and created PO of 17 even though we Stock in transit for 36 qty.
In MD06, it showed the STO but with exception Message 07. and didnt consider into availability check.
In config for the receiving site, the stock in transfer is checked on and so is the incl in PO has value X.
Sherry

Hi, Check through path SPRO -> Materials Management -> Consumption-Based Planning -> Plant Parameters -> Carry Out Overall Maintenance of Plant Parameters, Execute and go in maintain after entering your Plant,
There in Planning run column you will find Available Stocks tab click on that & maintain Tick for 'Stock in transfer'
refer below link, it may help you,
[Stock transfer order for MRP|Stock transfer order for MRP]
Edited by: tej yadav on Jan 22, 2012 3:45 PM

MTS not to consider open PR,PO and quality stock

Dear all,
my client wants for MTS scenario system not to consider Stock of RM for Open Purchase order, Open PR and Quality Stock at the time of MRP run for SFG and FG.
I tried in SPRO settings also in OPJJ( availability check - 02 and checking rule - PP) remove all tick maintain all stock empty and OPJK ( order type PI01 assign to checking rule PP) but system consider stock , how to solve this issue.
pls guide me
sakthi

Hi
Goto OPPQ and slect you plant
Click the Available stock
Check the BOX Indicator: stock in transfer available for planning
In OPJJ check the Incl. PR and Incl. PO for your availability check
try this
Thanks
S.Murali

MRP FOR INTER COMPANY- WITH 1 RECEIVING AND 3 SUPPLY PLANT

i have the following scenario:
1) i have company 'A' under company code 1000( purchasing plant) and it has 10 depos namely( A1 TO A10).
2) i have another company 'B' under company code 2000( manufacturing plant) .
3) under company code 'B' it has three manufacturing plant namely B1,B2 and B3.
4) Products x,y and Z are produced in all three plants namely B1,B2 and B3.
5) company 'A' receives the forecast for the year and give the requirement for all the three products(X,Y and Z)
to company 'B'
6) Based on the input from company 'A' icompany 'B' produce and sell all the final products(X,Y and Z) to
company 'A'.
7) company 'A ' and 'B' comes under same management and control area.
8) How to map into sap and how the requirement will be transferred from company' A' to 'B' and total stock
available under plants B1,B2 and B3 should be considered for MRP run for final products X,Y and Z.
( currently requirement is passed between executives of two company in the meeting).
9) some times the company 'B' has to deliver the final product to any of the depos( say A3 or A6) which is
situated near plant B1( under company code B) on instruction from company 'A', but the payment is paid only to company 'A' .This is done to avoid transit delay and transportation cost.
How to map into sap scenario
regards,
sekar chand

Hi Sekar,
MRP can be done only based on the Plant wise.
Please post it in PP and check
RR

How MRP Run exclude QI Stock Type of a Raw Material SLOC?

Dear all
Fact:
All of our raw materials must be subject to quarantinee upon GR. We have Storage Location of Raw Material: RMSL
In Material Master of that Raw Material
We are using the "SLOC of EP" (MRP View 2) to put the defaulted GR SLOC. And we also make use of the "Post to QI Stock" in View: Purchasing.
Upon GR:
During GR, the Raw Mat SLOC (RMSL) will be copied from "SLOC of EP" of the material master data, and it will be posted to the stock type "QI STOCK".
Problem:
However, when the MRP Controller run MRP, it will take the QI Stock Type of Raw Material SLOC into account.
Is there anyway we can exclude the QI Stock Type of Raw Material SLOC from MRP Run?
I have read from some threads to suggest to post it to the Quarantinee SLOC. We prefer not to create another Quarantinee SLOC (QISL) which will be filled in SLOC of EP and then after passing QC, we perform Transfer Posting from SLOC: QISL to SLOC: RMSL. We have a few Raw Material SLOCS and we do not want the Warehouse guy to get confused which Raw MAterial SLOC to choose upon GR. Rather, we prefer it to be defaulted in the "SLOC of EP" in the material master.
Please advise.
Edited by: Daimos on Jul 13, 2009 1:16 PM

Hi,
Generally MRP consider stock from all the storage location when run the MRP for Plant level for material.
However we can exclude the particular storage location from MRP Run, for those following settings to be done.
Go to MRP-2 View of material master and select the storage location to be excluded from MRP. (Press Shift +f1 ex .sloc2) As per your case it should be RMSL
In that MRP view go to Storage location MRP Tab.
And assign u201CSLoc MRP indicator = 1 (Storage location stock excluded from MRP)u201Dand save.
Now run the MRP, stock from sloc2 will not be considered to create-planned order.
Please try this and revert back.
Cheers,
Kumar.S

MRP recommendation -- Do a Stock transfer instead of Purch or prodn Order..

With the MRP report recommendations you can either select to fulfill the recomendation by Purchase Order or Production Order. is it possible to add another option i.e Stock Transfer. I.E Customer has mutliple warehouses in different regions and they are supplied via a primary warehouse. eg run MRP for region x and use the MRP recommendations to trigger stock transfers from the primary Warehouse.
Any pointers Greatly Appreciated!!!
thanks

Thanks for the reply, currently I am heading down the path of
using the order recomendation table (ORCM) from there it should be possible to run an addon to present this table with the option of a stock transfer from a primary warehouse
so the user would
1: run the MRP as normal
2:then from the recomendation screen launch a new screen that gives you the option of selecting a warehouse and initiating stock transfers for items that are available
3:ones that are not available(or not enough in stock) would remain on the recomendation report to be actioned with a PO or ProdOrder.
the stock transfer would move the stock to some sort of virtual wharehouse while the logistics physically move the goods. then then to receive the goods the user would enter a similar screen bring up all the goods in the virtual w/h and maybe tick all the valid ones and do a stock transfer to the 'actual' w/house.
ps any comments on this 'theory' are appreciated
thanks for looking

Compare 2 schemas and get the difference with .sql file.

Hi,
I am using ORACLE DATABASE 11g R2 and ORACLE Linux 5.
I want to perform a very lengthy process and want to make it automated.
I am having a software named as SVN. In which all the developers keep their updated scripts.
We have 2 schema's one is used for developement and when all the development seems good we implement the scripts on the final schema which is used by testing people also.
Now every day we need to check the modifications in the development schema, that we do by observing the updated scripts in the SVN software. Now we get the scripts which are modified.
We will fire this scripts to a sample schema then we will compare the objects in this schema and the same objects in our final schema. If the objects in sample schema is different than the final schema it should give me the
script to create the same type object in the final schema.
Below is a proper example to explain :-
Developement Schema :- 'DEV'
SVN Script Schema :- 'SVNscript'
Main Schema :- 'MAIN'
1) On Monday developers modified/added 4 tables in the development schema names 'DEV' after working for a day they found that the changes are necessary and so checked-in in the SVN software.
2) On tuesday morning we found 4 scripts which has been modified/added in the SVN.
The Scripts were as follows :-
1St table :- An extra column was added.
2nd table :- An index was created on it.
3rd table :- 2 Columns were dropped from it.
4th table :- A new table is added in the schema.
Now taking these 4 scripts i am going to execute it in a sample schema named :- SVNscript
SVNscript schema will have now 4 tables with proper properties(columns,indexes,...). Now this is the final table structure as we want in our 'MAIN' schema .
Coming to MAIN schema which is our most important schema and all the development work is finally posted here.Considering MAIN schema is having around 1000 tables,500 function/procedure/package and many more DB objects.
I want to compare(one way compare) from SVNscript schema --> MAIN schema :- That the objects present in the SVNscripts schema is same or not in the MAIN schema. If its not same then this code should generate a .sql script for me which i should be able to fire on the MAIN schema.
The output .sql scripts should be something like this :-
1st Table :- Alter table add...
2nd Table :- Create index on table...
3rd Table :- Alter table drop...
4th table :- Create table tablename...
I found a link while trying this but it is not the perfect fit to my requirement
http://www.dbspecialists.com/files/scripts/compare_schemas.sql
Please let me know the best code to compare 2 schemas and get a .sql file as output of the difference.
Thanks in advance.

Yes I followed the tutorial properly this time. Still i have a few queries :-
1) This is returning me the 'ALTER TABLE...' statement but how to make it more efficient to return all the DDL dependent on the table, Like index,trigger,view...
2) I want to compare objects in a different schema on a different db. I have created an DBLINK but how to use it ... can i use it like
DBMS_METADATA.OPEN('TABLE'," Network_link_name " );Can you please give me some clear about it.
3) I created a table 'TAB1' with which i want to compare a 'TAB1' in other schema.I was not getting how to compare on remote dblink so,I created the same table with the following code in the same schema
CREATE TABLE TAB1_OLD as select * from TAB1@DBLINK where 1=2;Now when i fire the below query to get the alter difference I get the following error :-
SQL> SELECT get_table_alterddl('TAB1','TAB1_old') FROM dual;
SELECT get_table_alterddl('TAB1','TAB1_old') FROM dual
ORA-31603: object "TAB1_old" of type TABLE not found in schema "SVNCHECK"
ORA-06512: at "SYS.DBMS_METADATA", line 5225
ORA-06512: at "SYS.DBMS_METADATA", line 5189
ORA-06512: at "SVNCHECK.GET_TABLE_SXML", line 17
ORA-06512: at "SVNCHECK.COMPARE_TABLE_SXML", line 12
ORA-06512: at "SVNCHECK.GET_TABLE_ALTERXML", line 11
ORA-06512: at "SVNCHECK.GET_TABLE_ALTERDDL", line 11
Can you please guide me why i am getting this error?
I have made sure that TAB1_OLD table has been created and the entries are also present in the data dictionary tables.
SQL> select * from tab1_old;
EMPNO ENAME MGR DEPTNO
----- -------------------- ----- ------The only difference is that this table was created with CREATE TABLE AS SELECT statement ....
Thanks.

Consider the pending PO and Purchase requisition fore cast base planning (vv)

Dear friends,
Our client at presently they are using Forecast based planning for RAW material , in that requirement will not consider Pending Pur req and PO, Is that any option for consider pending PO for Forecast based planning , kindly do the needful.
Regards,
Sabhapathy R

Hello Sabhapathy,
I am not sure why you would need to consider pending PurReqs and POs. These pending documents are considered during the MRP run, but not to generate the forecast.
Forecast-based planning is based on material consumption.
The MRP will generate PurReq or Planner Orders considering the open documents. For example:
+ Current stock = 1000 CS
+ Open PRs and POs to arrive = 400 CS
- Forecast Requirement =1500 CS
- Safety Stock policies = 100 CS (safety stok)
- New replenishment orders = 200 CS
Thanks and Regards,
Mariano

MRP FOR On order stock

hi
Can anybody pls tell me does system consider open PO qty, On order stock qty(rejected materials), Open PR qty while MRP run.
If yes How does it happen?
If suppose I want system not to consider above stock in MRP run,
How can I do It?
Pls suggest..
Pravin

Hi,
I am not sure what you mean by "on order stock qty" (rejected materials), but if you are using MRP type PD it will look at all documents and items that will affect stock (POs, Planned orders, requisitions, sales orders, production orders, PM orders etc. etc.).
This is not configurable or changeable because the logic of PD is "Full planning" or "Plan Deterministic" (determining everything that affects stock).
You have some minor control over things such as "stock in transafer" and "blocked stock", you can decide if MRP should ignore or include these. But if you use PD then all of the above will be considered.
You can use other MRP types such as reorder point planning and this ignores all of the above and just maintains the stock levels above or equal to the reorder point. (although you can even configure reorder point MRP to take orders etc. into consideration).
So unless you switch to reorder point planning or forecast planning you will find that the above types of document / orders will be considered by MRP.
Steve B

Error while uploading stock using Mb1c and migo

Hi
Following error is showing,while uploading stock using Mb1c and migo
Return code 8 is not permitted with BAdI 'FAGL_PERIOD_CHECK'
Can anyone help me?/
Thanks

Hi
You will need the help of an abaper in solving this , as a BAdi FAGL_PERIOD_CHECK - Posting Period Check has been activated.
Please check the implementation of the BAdi , i feel that it has not been implemented properly.
This Business Add-In (BAdI) enables you to extend the existing check of open posting periods.
The result of the period check is provided to you as a parameter (CH_SUBRC). In your implementation, you can derive this parameter again (for example, if a posting is rejected under a certain condition).
The following values are allowed for parameter CH_SUBRC:
0 Posting allowed
4 Period & is not open for account type & and general ledger &
6 No authorization for posting period & &
This is a custome developemnt , so only the ABAper present at your end will be able to resolve it.
Thanks & Regards
Kishore

Forms pulling Multiple Records from an XML Schema and XML data files - Adobe LiveCycle Designer

I built a form in Adobe LiveCycle with an xml schema and data file. The problem is with how the form renders the xml data file.
I have a statement element that consists of about 6 fields (statementID, statementName, statementAddress, statementCountry, statementZip, statementDate, etc) of data in the schema that allows for multiple iterations - so one xml data file can contain multiple statements. These fields allow for null values.
But here's the problem: When any of the statements - say statement 2 of 6 - has a null value in one of the fields, if the xml data file doesn't have a placeholder
(example of placeholder: <statementName type="String"/> )in the xml for that field, my form pulls the field value from the NEXT statement.
This corrupts all the rest of the statement records, as this field is shifted up for all the rest.
I know that in the past I haven't needed a placeholder when a field was null. But I'm wondering if when the data allows for multiple records the xml data file needs to generate the placeholder. And where is the problem? In the Schema? The xml data file? My form? And the 64-thousand-dollar question: How to fix it?

If your <statement> element is the one that repeats, it should be bound to a subform with the binding string of something like $.statement[*]. Then in that subform should be your fields and they should have bindings of $.statementID, $.statementName, $.statementAddress, etc.
Kyle

Creation of a Quotation with a WBS of a Project that has no project stock

Is it possible to create a quotation or a sales order that is assigned to a project that has 'no project stock' (PROJ-BESTA) in the project profile? We are using a non valuated material in the quotation but get the error message CN769 'Material valuation is different'. Project stock is not required, we do need the revenues and the billing plans from SD.

Hi,
Check your requirement class derived for the material.
In the "Account Assignment" sub tab of requirement class maintenance, see the Valuation field value (for special stock) maintained.
It should probably be "blank" or "A" for your scenario.
regards

XML DevCon 2001: Submit schema and stylesheet problems- win XML Spy

There are only a few days to submit schema and stylesheet problems for XML
DevCon 2001 in London. If the workshop instructors use your submission
during the conference, you win a copy of XML Spy.
<shamelessPlug>
XML DevCon 2001 has a content-rich technical program with a faculty that
includes Henry Thompson (W3C Fellow), Peter Chen (IEEE Fellow, ACM
Fellow),
Martin Bryan (DIFFUSE Project), and authors such as Bob DuCharme, Ian
Graham, Elliotte Rusty Harold, G. Ken Holman, Benoît Marchal, JP
Morgenthal,
and Simon St. Laurent. There are a variety of eBusiness sessions,
including
panel discussions and presentations about ebXML, Web Services, and UDDI.
The program includes presentations by Jonathan Borden, Ron Bourret, Lee
Buck, Alex Chaffee, Mark Colan, John Evdemon, Meike Klettke, Andy
Longshaw,
Ingo Macherius, Simon Nicholson, David Orchard, Sebastian Rahtz, Daniel
Rivers-Moore, Michael Rys, Krishna Sankar, Matt Sergeant, Richard Tobin,
Priscilla Walmsley, David RR Webber and other distinguished faculty.
</shamelessPlug>
http://www.xmldevcon2001.com/London/html/conference.php
For a free pass to exhibits and special events (keynotes, joint XML UK and
British Computer Society meeting, OASIS XPath/XSLT meeting, vendor
presentations):
http://www.xmldevcon2001.com/London/html/special_events.php
Public submissions (schemas and stylesheets)
Three members of the W3C Schema Working Group (Michael Rys, Henry
Thompson, Priscilla Walmsley) will teach a Schema Workshop. Submit
problem schemas to them by e-mail:
[email protected]
or
http://www.xmldevcon2001.com/London/html/session.php?code=W5
Sebastian Rahtz, Bob DuCharme, Benoît Marchal, and Ken Holman will
present the "Stylesheets and Transformations: Best Practices" workshop on
Thursday, February 22 in London. To submit a stylesheet or problem
description for their workshop:
[email protected]
or browse to:
http://www.xmldevcon2001.com/London/html/session.php?code=T17
========== Ken North ======================
See you at Javacon 2001 (New York, March 1)
www.javacon2001.com
XML DevCon 2001: London (February 21-23) New York (April 8-11)
www.xmldevcon2001.com
=======================================

Looks okay to me. But then I have no idea of what those "problems" are that you mentioned. Was there a particular reason you didn't tell us what they are?

FI-TV Scheme and Field control in Travel Manager

Hello!
Question:
The question is - Is it possible to somehow customize field control for TRIP selective screen by means of SPRO IMG Scheme and field control or transaction FITVFELD (i.e. hide some fields or add new fields)? Or fields can be added or deleted only by ABAP modifications and User-exits?
Prerequisite: I need to add an additional CHAR or TEXT field "Document number" in TRIP transaction which will allow a manager to manually enter a document number of a trip. Further this field has to be added in reports as well, so that manager could get all the trip details due to this new field "Document number".
What am I doing wrong?
Looking forward for your reply!
Regards,
Eldar

Hi..
how do you define trip provision variant at first?
did copy standard variant?!
if you copy from standard variant - such as 01, or 99, then you will find schema under your copy trip variant.
hope it helps.

Mavericks has broken most stock apps, app store ,preview, messages, facetime ect the list goes on they bounce in the menu then nothing its been like that since installing mavericks fixed briefly by reinstalling but then stopped again very quickly

mavericks has broken most stock apps, app store ,preview, messages, facetime ect the list goes on they bounce in the menu then nothing its been like that since installing mavericks fixed briefly by reinstalling but then stopped again very quickly
any help ?

You most likely ran a defective third-party "utility" such as "CleanMyMac" or "MacCleanse" that purports to "clean up" "junk" files. What it really does is to corrupt the operating system and many applications.
The first thing you need to do is remove that software according to the developer's instructions. Never install it, or anything like it, again. Then see below.
If you don't already have a current backup, back up all data, then reinstall the OS.* You don't need to erase the startup volume, and you won't need the backup unless something goes wrong. If the system was upgraded from an older version of OS X, you may need the Apple ID and password you used.
If you use FileVault 2, then before running the Installer you must launch Disk Utility and select the icon of the FileVault startup volume ("Macintosh HD," unless you gave it a different name.) It will be nested below another icon with the same name. Click the Unlock button in the toolbar and enter your login password when prompted. Then quit Disk Utility to be returned to the main Recovery screen.
There are ways to back up a computer that isn't fully functional. Ask if you need guidance.
If you installed the Java runtime distributed by Apple and still need it, you'll have to reinstall it. The same goes for Xcode. All other data will be preserved.
*The linked support article refers to OS X 10.9 ("Mavericks"), but the procedure is the same for OS X 10.7 ("Lion") and later.

MRP has to consider stock of Scheme and Space

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for