MSMQ read/write is slow

Sir,
I have installed MSMQ in my Windows server 2008 R2 operation system but the queue reading and writing is very slow .It gives me 150 to 160 messages per second for write or read and the speed decreases if the read and write operation is performed at
a time .
Earlier I have MSMQ on Windows server 2003 .Read/write operations is fine and performance is good.It gives me 1000 to 2000 messages per second .
Regards,
Sandeep

Hi,
Thanks for posting here.
Regarding the current issue, please try to refer to the following article to see if it could improve the performance.
How to improve MSMQ disk performance
http://blogs.msdn.com/b/johnbreakwell/archive/2008/02/13/msmq-disk-performance.aspx
Hope this helps.
Best Regards,
Andy Qi
Andy Qi
TechNet Community Support

Similar Messages

Firewire drive read/write very slow

I have a Western Digital firewire 400 drive which is writing very slowly. 200 mb file took about 4 minutes to copy. I figure it must be a drive issue, but wondered if there is the chance it's some system thing. I used Disk Utility to check and repair it, but to no avail. The data is still there, it's just very slow to write to it. Copying off it is no problem though (which is good!)
Does anyone know if this can be addressed or is it just a bad drive?

Three years seems pretty bad to me. I don't expect drive to fail that quickly. What do you mean by "those WD drives do that"? Do you mean that WD drives are not so good, or those cheaper end ones? I was going to replace it with a WD studio drive, which is formatted for Mac and has FW 800 and a five year warranty as opposed to one year, which suggests to me that it's a better quality item, but at least if it isn't, it has a long warranty.

Hard drive read write speeds are too slow

I was having an issue with 17inch macbook pro. was getting 4.0mb/s read write speed tops. and smart status failure.
So i replaced the drive. The new drive is a 7200 RPM 500GB WD drive. I'm getting 12.0mb/s on top speed. Computer feels a little quicker but still slow overall.
I ran this test on a fresh install of snow leopard.
Is it just me or do those read/write speeds on the new drive still seem slow?
2007 17inch macbook pro with 2gigs of ram.

That does seem slow - on the other hand, what are you using to measure it?
My 1Tb 2.5" SATA drive performance shows as follows: http://grab.by/7zau
Xbench Stats: http://grab.by/7zau
Anything in System Profiler? http://grab.by/7zaR
Link Speed at 3 Gb?

Formatted on XP - EXTREMELY SLOW read/write on the Mac !!!!

Man this iPod is wack!! Im using the iPod mini in Disk Mode to transfer bits (updaters since my XP machine is NEVER connected to the net) back and forth between my PowerBook and my XP Intel based machine. Obviously i set up and formatted the iPod Mini on the XP machine.
Observation, file read/write times are unacceptably SLOW on Mac and the PC. Did Apple deliberately make this thing unusable in this situation? This thing has a transfer speed as if it were connected to a USB 1.1 port but it is NOT, on any of my machines. I format my USB Flash Drive (SanDisk Cruzer Titanium) on the same XP machine, use the same ports and it's read/write times are at least 5 times faster than the Mini !!!
When i format and setup the iPod Mini on the Mac then install MacDrive on the PC astonishingly the read/write times significantly increase on BOTH Mac and the PC. As i suggested i think there is something drastically wrong with Apple's PC iPod setup, there is NO way my other devices formatted on the PC have such abysmal performance . Man i click on a folder in the Finder of the PC formatted iPod and it take about 3 seconds until the files inside are displayed...this is also the case on the PC.
Anyone else experienced this?
I was going to buy another iPod specifically for transferring data between my Mac's and my colleagues PC's, but there is no way i will with such severely degraded read/write performance.
Best

Apparently this is not a single isolated case.
Scott Aronian Posts :
"On Mac FAT32 Format Slower Than HFS "
My 60GB iPod came in Windows FAT32 format which I liked since I could use it in disk mode on both Mac & Windows. However it seemed slow to start playing video and when switching between video files.
I did some timing tests and on the Mac FAT32 was much slower than HFS.
FAT32
Start playing movie = 12s
Stop movie and restart at same location = between 12-30s
HFS
Start playing movie = 5s
Stop movie and restart at same location = between 6s
If you have a Mac and your new 5G iPod is formatted for Windows, you may want to use the iPod Updated to restore and make the drive HFS.
There is NO such performance problems with USB Flash drives when formatted to Fat32 on PC's i have tested many and they perform similar on BOTH platforms.
Something fishy goin on here

Socket read write on Solaris 8 too slow.

Hi
We have an application which consists of several server instances.
The front-end is web-based , using JSP/Servlets. We are using Tomcat 4.0.
The servlet makes several connections to the underlying servers. But the read/write operation is too slow. Same setup runs much quicker on Windows.
We are running jdk1.4.1_02 (stable ?). Would much appreciate any help.
cheers
Projyal

tomcat version --3.2.3
j2sdk version----1.4
plarform---------solaris
solaris version--8
using the aboue configuration i need to deploy JSP codes on the solaris platfrom..can any technical expert guide me on how to do this..would be grateful if anyone could suggest a good site where i can download free tuorials of "JSP" for development in HTML files format or HELP format]
thank you
regards
brijesh

Slow performance to read/write shared variables programatically

We are using datasocket read and write functions to read and write shared variables programatically (in the same machine) but we only achieve a performance of aprox. 200 reads/writes per second. We are using Labview 8.6 with DSC.
Is possible to get better results? That performance is normal?
Any help would be appreciated. Thank you in advance.

Hi MMCDAT,
I think this value can
be normal as you can see in this link:
http://zone.ni.com/devzone/cda/tut/p/id/5037
As you can see, the
limit for datasocket depends on your Ethernet limitations, even if you as using
it just in one PC:
http://digital.ni.com/public.nsf/websearch/6AC9E65734E53F9A8625672400637ECC?OpenDocument
You can improve the
performance changing the update mode or Vis configurations:
http://digital.ni.com/public.nsf/allkb/F8F7DE98856B50588625672400648045?OpenDocument
http://digital.ni.com/public.nsf/allkb/2D9C6D73A160537986256B290076456E?OpenDocument

Reader/Writer.close() is slow

I've written a multi-threaded application that does a lot of disk I/O using Buffered and File Reader/Writers. Each thread is reading and writing it's OWN file. Everything works great except the performance of the Reader/Writer.close() method. When I'm running say 10 threads at a time and my code calls close() it can take anywhere from 1 - 3 seconds for the call to return. If I only run 5 threads then close() returns in a respectable timeframe.
Can someone please explain what could be causing close() to take so long to return?
Thanks!

Each thread has to vie for CPU time with other processes on your system. More threads means more scheduling of processes, the threads do not run at the same time--it's just an illusion created by scheduling. When you have 10 threads, you have more scheduling going on--hence more wait when you want to close out: you have wait for each to gain enough active CPU time to flush and close, but there can only be up to as many threads running at one time as your system has CPUs*Threads/CPU. Just because you have more Java threads, does not mean that you're processing faster--it just means there is seperate processing going on as the system can schedule resources for your threads to work in with the rest of the system processes all of them essentially competing for many of the same resources.

Slow read/write over Thunderbolt and SSD

Hey all,
I recently picked up a Seagate GoFlex Thunderbolt sled and a 256GB Toshiba SSD for it.
I am wanting to use it as my Lightroom 5 catalog and Smart Preview drive, and leave the main HD clean.
When transfering all the info over from my main HDD, (158GB) I checked on Activity Monitor to see the real time read/write to the drive, and it only topped out at 150MB/sec. What gives?
I tested with an external FW800 and got 50-60MB/sec
Then tested with esata drive and got 80MB/sec
Both of these are platter drives.
I was expecting WAAAYYY more from the Seagate TB and SSD combo.
Did I set something up wrong? Have I been reading data wrong?
2011 i7 MBP
16GB ram
Toshiba SSD
Seagate GOflex Thunderbolt Adapter
Thank you

Hey,
I have the Seagate GoFlex Thunderbolt. And C300 SSD connected to it. The speed at which I am getting the SSD write at 196.5 MB/s and to read 323.4 MB/s.
You can use something call blackmagic disk speed to monitor how fast your drive is actually reading and writing.
The speed limitation you see may be from the actual SSD or copying from HDD to SSD. This will test direct reading and writing on the SSD, and will give you a better/truer speed.
Hope that helps
Ed

When I start Firefox, my computer slows to a crawl; the problem is that between every operation, the disk reads/writes for about a minute.

I have an old (~6 yrs) HP laptop running Win XP. I've scanned for viruses, deleted temp files, etc, and defraged the hard drive. After doing a fresh boot, all works OK until I start Firefox (3.6.6), and then every mouse click sends the hard drive into read/write mode for up to a minute. Just writing this memo has taken eight minutes; going to my bank site and setting up a transfer (about 12 mouse clicks) took 16 minutes (!).
Things other than Firefox continue to be plagued by the same problems, after starting and closing Firefox. Opening an Explorer window can take up to three minutes. Closing Firefox doesn't seem to solve the problem - I need to reboot to do that.
Any thoughts?

Start Firefox in Safe Mode (above). Wait a few minutes, then close Firefox.
Is there still a problem?
If you are still having issues;
Type '''about:support''' in the address bar and press '''Enter.'''
Under the main banner, press the button; '''Copy Text To Clipboard.'''.
Then in the reply box at the bottom of this page,
do a right click in the box and select '''Paste.'''
This will show us your system details.
'''No Personal Information Is Collected.'''
Start your '''Computer''' in safe mode with networking. Then start Firefox.
'''[http://encyclopedia2.thefreedictionary.com/Linux+Safe+Mode Starting The Computer In Safe Mode;<br>Free Online Encyclopedia]'''

Make external hard drive read/write

Not quite sure if there is in the right section but oh well.
Here's the story:
SeaGate FreeAgent GoFlex Drive (1.5TB) (THE FOLLOWING INFO WAS TAKEN FROM ITS APPLICATION: ("SEAGATE DRIVE SETTINGS")
Drive Info
Model: FA GoFlex Desk
Firmware: 0D19
Volume Info
Format: Windows NT Filesystem
Capacity: 1397.26 GB
Available: 1224.35 GB
Used: 172.91 GB
Mount point: /Volumes/FreeAgent GoFlex Drive
So it seems to slow down my iMac (10.6.8), 2GHz Intel Core 2 Duo, 1.5GB 667 MHz DDR2 SDRAM (memory) (1st Generation 17 inch) a fair bit. Could this be because of the Format? I have no idea why it says that. When I first installed it, it asked what OS I'm going to use it for. Not quite sure if I chose both or just Mac. But those files have somehow dissappeared.
Now in Disk Utility...the RAID tab, Format says it is set to Mac OS Extended (Journaled) but then in the Erase tab it says Format: Windows NT Filesystem
Which format is it set to!?!?!?!?!?!?!
Now to the main point:
I also have a new 13" MacBook Pro. When I plug it into it, I only have Read Permissions. How do I make it have Write Permissions as well?
Sorry for the long essay...I hope you can help me. I might have two problems here.
1. Is the format correctly set up for my iMac?
2. How do I set it to have Read/Write permissions on different computers?
Thanks.

The Format is incorrect for Mac use, as you guessed. Go into Disk Utility again, highlight the external har drive in the left hamd column by clicking on it and select the "Erase" tab, up and over to the right. Then select the Format below that will be installed as "Mac OS Extended (Journeled)". THEN, OK the erasure. That should clear things up.
Note: your Windows PC will NO LONGER be able to read the external hard drive. It will be formatted for OS X use.
Hope this helps

Mac Mini drive read/write 20MB/s

I've been fighting a slow drive for months and have yet to find a solution. Most recently I installed a 1 TB 7200 RPM drive from OWC, cloned my drive and find the new drive measures about the same read/write speed of 20-25 MB/s. I'm at a loss to find a solution. Interestingly when I test the stock 500 GB drive that is now reformatted and empty I see it measures 50 MB/s read/write.
The drive has about 300 GB of 1 TB free and should be relatively fragment free since I copied over the data in one swoop.
I've seen others suggesting a format/reinstall but that sounds to me like the Windows mentality of "hiding" the problem instead of locating and resolving the issue (e.g. reboot and see if it goes away...solved!). Notably, if I take the time to reinstall and reconfigure after formatting how do I know I won't just end up in the same circumstance again.
I appreciate any suggestions to locate what might be causing the slow speed or any troubleshooting tips to narrow the culprit. For example, I ran...
kextstat | grep -v com.apple
...a while back and discovered I had FSEventer still installed from long ago when I tried it out briefly It installs a kext that tracks all filesystem activity so it noticebly affects read/write speed. Removing that moved me from 15 MB/s to the 20s. Now kexstat doesn't list any non-Apple kexts.
I appreciate any other suggestions to discover drivers or really software of any kind beyond default Apple provided OS-level stuff that I can systematically eliminate in search of a solution.
Thanks for any and all help!

Hi, I'm thinking reformat isn't the way to go, leastwise not yet!
You get these speeds copying to/from what?
What size Cache is this new drive?
How is this drive connected, internally or externally?
Might try Etrecheck...
http://www.etresoft.com/etrecheck

Muti-channel read/write through FP data socket posible?

Hello,
I'm trying to talk to cFP-1808 module from desktop PC real-time host over Ethernet. I did not find any Fieldpoint driver for desktop RT so I'm forced to use data sockets to communicate with cFP-1808. It seems that one can only read or write to one FP data channel per socket. With typical latency of tens of milliseconds per such read/write and couple of hundreds channels present, I'm looking at SECONDS per cycle time, which is really slow.
Is there any workaround for this problem?

You can also read and write to channels in LabVIEW. First you have to configure your 1808 in MAX and save the IAK file. You then load the IAK file in LabVIEW by selecting browse in the FieldPoint IO Point In (constant or control).
In the FieldPoint Device Selection Dialog Windows select the View Configurations Tab.
In this tab navigate to your IAK file and name it in the text box next to where the full file path is displayed.
In the Browse FieldPoint Tab of the same window you should now be able to see all of your FieldPoint modules and channels.
Message Edited by BLAQmx on 03-06-2008 01:12 PM
Mark
LabVIEW R&D

NEW Excel Read/Write Lib for JAVA

FastExcel is a pure java excel read/write component.It's FAST and TINY. provide:
* Reading and Writing support for Excel '97(-2003) (BIFF8) file format.
* Low level structures for BIFF(Binary Interchange File Format).
* Low level structures for compound document file format (also known as "OLE2 storage file format" or "Microsoft Office compatible storage file format").
* API for creating, reading excel file.
website http://fastexcel.sourceforge.net/
Edited by: guooscar on Jun 18, 2009 7:44 PM

guooscar wrote:
cotton.m wrote:
guooscar wrote:
I read almost all of jxl source code and i try to use it to export/import data the result is slow，OOM，thats allOkay, fair enough.= _ =|||?
At best this is a pretty specialized tool right? I mean 300,000,000 rows of data imported or exported (and I'm not sure which) daily from/to Excel is a bit of a wtf.
But without formula support... it's sort of like the difference between a SAX and DOM parser.

G710 hard drive read/write speed

Hello,
I have a brand new Ideapad G710 with 1TB Serial ATA 2, 5400rpm with advertised speed of 3 Gb/s (= 384MB/s).
I am running Windows 7 ultimate x64 with SP1.
When I test hard drive read/write speed (I used CrystalDiskMark) I get results of about 100MB/s, which is 3-4 times slower than it should be.
I am not running any resource heavy applications (Resource monitor reports Disk I/O to be 0 most of the time in idle state). I have 3 partitions, each with 16-32GB paging file size and all are >90% empty. All partitions have been defragmented before testing.
Is this normal? Are there any lenovo drivers or utilities than I might be missing or that can slow/speed this?
Solved!
Go to Solution.

hi Daew,
Welcome to the Lenovo Forums.
The results that you got while running CrystalDiskMark is normal. The SATA 2 (3Gb/s) that you mentioned is actually the SATA interface support, not the actual read/write performance.
If you have a Seagate HDD (eg. ST10000LM024), check these specs
From the above specs, the unit has a cache that has a read/write max speed of 145 MB/s but there are environmental factors and power requirements to get this speed (eg. read/write speed on AC power is differente from battery power).
AFAIK, if this is the specs that is design for this drive, there's no way to speed it up.
If you're planning to upgrade in the future though, you can get an SSD for faster read/write.
Regards
Did someone help you today? Press the star on the left to thank them with a Kudo!
If you find a post helpful and it answers your question, please mark it as an "Accepted Solution"! This will help the rest of the Community with similar issues identify the verified solution and benefit from it.
Follow @LenovoForums on Twitter!

Read/write problem with Datasockets.

Hi, I'm a newcomer to Labview, and I'm having a problem with Datasockets. When trying to create a 'Publish & Subscribe' socket between two machines it only works on one, the one whose dstp address is the local machine, the other being incapable of writing to this 'host' and displaying red LEDs, although it is reading from the host. Also I've only managed to set up these read/write connections using the right-click options, how is it done programatically? Any clarification on the issue (whether directly connected or not :-) would be appreciated. Many thanks,
Tom

Hi Lector!
This is normal behavior for DataSocket. You want to run a DataSocket server on both machines. Although you can SUBSCRIBE to a DS server anywhere on the network, you can only publish to your local server. We do a LOT of Datasocket work here, and this has never been a problem. It's a real security bonus, as well.
It's a good idea to split all your read and write functions. Although some front panel objects (knobs, particularly) can be controls and indicators simultaneaously, it's good practice, for a number of reasons, to NOT use both functions. I build "dummy" front panels for all my VI's which I distribute to all my colleagues who need to work with a remote instrument.
You cannot really appreciate DataSocket, till you've tried to rem
otely control something with PC Anywhere over a slow network! A bit of practice, and you'll wonder how you ever did anything without DataSocket. I'd be glad to work with you on any particulars. Good Luck!
Eric
Eric P. Nichols
P.O. Box 56235
North Pole, AK 99705

MSMQ read/write is slow

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for