Multiple disks with identical partition names

(cross-posted from the Mac Ach:)
Just a day before the announcement of the FW800less BunnyBooks, I bought me an FW800 external, to boot my PB off while working at home.
I intend to clone my internal to it, keeping the same organisation in which for instance I have partitions OSX1 (root) and OSX2 (case sensitive), with a softlink work -> /Volumes/OSX2/Users/bertin/work in my home directory. Rather than calling my external partitions OSX1e and OSX2e (for instance), and having to modify all my links, I'd prefer to call the external partitions OSX1 and OSX2 too. (This means I could keep the 2 disks synchronised easily.) OS X handles this correctly by changing the mountpoint name in /Volumes on the fly.
My question is about the mount order during booting. When I boot from the external, its partitions will be /dev/disk0s*, but does that mean that /Volumes/OSX1 and /Volumes/OSX2 will be guaranteed to point to the external disk's partitions (and to the internal disk's when booting off that one)?
Thanks,
René

Similar Messages

[svn] 949: Bug: BLZ-96 - When sending a HttpService request from ActionScript with multiple headers with the same name , it causes a ClassCastException in the server

Revision: 949
Author: [email protected]
Date: 2008-03-27 07:12:59 -0700 (Thu, 27 Mar 2008)
Log Message:
Bug: BLZ-96 - When sending a HttpService request from ActionScript with multiple headers with the same name, it causes a ClassCastException in the server
QA: Yes - try again with legacy-collection true and false.
Doc: No
Checkintests: Pass
Details: Another try in fixing this bug. When legacy-collection is false, Actionscript Array on the client becomes Java Array on the server and my fix yesterday assumed this case. However, when legacy-collection is true, Actionscript Array becomes Java ArrayList on the server. So added code to handle this case.
Ticket Links:
http://bugs.adobe.com/jira/browse/BLZ-96
Modified Paths:
blazeds/branches/3.0.x/modules/proxy/src/java/flex/messaging/services/http/proxy/RequestF ilter.java

Hi all!
Just to post the solution to this if anyone ever runs accross this thread...
For some reason i had it bad the first time, don't have time right now to see why but here is what worked for me:
HashMap primaryFile = new HashMap();
primaryFile.put("fileContent", bFile);
primaryFile.put("fileName", uploadedFile.getFilename());
operationBinding.getParamsMap().put("primaryFile", primaryFile);
HashMap customDocMetadata = new HashMap();
HashMap [] properties = new HashMap[1];
HashMap customMetadataPropertyRoom = new HashMap();
customMetadataPropertyRoom.put("name", "xRoom");
customMetadataPropertyRoom.put("value", "SOME ROOM");
properties[0] = customMetadataPropertyRoom;
customDocMetadata.put("property", properties);
operationBinding.getParamsMap().put("CustomDocMetaData", customDocMetadata);
Basically an unbounded wsdl type is an array of objects (HashMaps), makes sense, i thought i had it like this before, must have messed up somewhere...
Good luck all!

[svn] 931: Bug: BLZ-96 - When sending a HttpService request from ActionScript with multiple headers with the same name , it causes a ClassCastException in the server

Revision: 931
Author: [email protected]
Date: 2008-03-26 11:31:01 -0700 (Wed, 26 Mar 2008)
Log Message:
Bug: BLZ-96 - When sending a HttpService request from ActionScript with multiple headers with the same name, it causes a ClassCastException in the server
QA: Yes - we need automated tests for this basic case.
Doc: No
Checkintests: Pass
Details: RequestFilter was not handling multiple headers with the same name properly.
Ticket Links:
http://bugs.adobe.com/jira/browse/BLZ-96
Modified Paths:
blazeds/branches/3.0.x/modules/proxy/src/java/flex/messaging/services/http/proxy/RequestF ilter.java

Hi all!
Just to post the solution to this if anyone ever runs accross this thread...
For some reason i had it bad the first time, don't have time right now to see why but here is what worked for me:
HashMap primaryFile = new HashMap();
primaryFile.put("fileContent", bFile);
primaryFile.put("fileName", uploadedFile.getFilename());
operationBinding.getParamsMap().put("primaryFile", primaryFile);
HashMap customDocMetadata = new HashMap();
HashMap [] properties = new HashMap[1];
HashMap customMetadataPropertyRoom = new HashMap();
customMetadataPropertyRoom.put("name", "xRoom");
customMetadataPropertyRoom.put("value", "SOME ROOM");
properties[0] = customMetadataPropertyRoom;
customDocMetadata.put("property", properties);
operationBinding.getParamsMap().put("CustomDocMetaData", customDocMetadata);
Basically an unbounded wsdl type is an array of objects (HashMaps), makes sense, i thought i had it like this before, must have messed up somewhere...
Good luck all!

[svn] 889: Add test case for BLZ-82 where HttpService should return multiple headers with the same name .

Revision: 889
Author: [email protected]
Date: 2008-03-21 13:08:05 -0700 (Fri, 21 Mar 2008)
Log Message:
Add test case for BLZ-82 where HttpService should return multiple headers with the same name.
Ticket Links:
http://bugs.adobe.com/jira/browse/BLZ-82
Added Paths:
blazeds/trunk/qa/apps/qa-regress/remote/MultipleHeadersTest.jsp
blazeds/trunk/qa/apps/qa-regress/testsuites/mxunit/tests/proxyService/httpservice/MultiHe aderTest.mxml

Hi again,
this may be old news to some people, but I just realized we can have the desired benefits I originally listed (encapsulation, reuse, maintainability, security) TODAY by using pipelined functions and using the table() function in Apex report region queries.
So the report query basically becomes, for example (if get_employees is a pipelined function)
select * from table(my_package.get_employees(:p1_deptno))
The only downside compared to a (weakly typed) sys_refcursor is that you have to define the type you are returning in your package spec (or as an SQL type). So it's a bit more coding, but it's still worth it for the other benefits it provides.
I like Apex even better now! :-)
- Morten

Is it possible to search for multiple folders with the same name and...

Is it possible to search for multiple folders with the same name and then select them all and change the permissions on just those folders .i.e. Search for the budget folders in all client folders and lock them down to just the project managers. Without having to go to each folder and apply the permissions.

user11919409 wrote:
Is it possible to create a Clone database with the same name of source db using RMAN ...
yes
>
DB version is 11.2.0.2
Is it possible to clone a 11.2.0.2 database to 11.2.0.3 home location directly on a new server . If it starts in a upgrade mode , it is ok ....yes
Handle:     user11919409
Status Level:     Newbie (10)
Registered:     Dec 7, 2009
Total Posts:     102
Total Questions:     28 (22 unresolved)
why do you waste time here when you rarely get any answers to your questions?

XOQ-01950: Cube contains multiple BuildSpecifications with the same name.

Hi All ,
While executing the Maintain Cube option it is throwing below issue : Any Clue ?
XOQ-01950: The AWCubeOrganization for cube "NN_OLAP_POC.MARKET_SALES_CUBE" contains multiple BuildSpecifications with the same name.
Thanks,
DxP

This error should only show up when you create a cube (by importing XML), not when you maintain it. So I will assume that this is what you mean.
If you import XML that refers to an OLAP object that already exists, then the new definition overrides the old one. The only exception to this rule is the BuildSpecification object. This kind of object is named, but it does not follow these conventions (for messy implementation reasons). If you import XML that has a BuildSpecificaiton with the same name as one that already exists, then you will trigger the error you see. Here is an example of the relevant XML.
<BuildSpecifications>
<![CDATA[BUILD SPEC LOAD_AND_AGGREGATE
LOAD NO SYNCH,
SOLVE
) ]]>
</BuildSpecifications>The workaround is to delete this section from the XML before importing it.

Can iTunes sync multiple songs with the same name?

My iTunes library has multiple songs with the same name (but they point to different files on the filesystem).
Curiously when iTunes syncs to my iPhone it will only ever sync two of the files, even if more exists. I suspect what is happening is described below, but I have no way of verifying it:
Let's assume I have 5 songs named IdenticalName, on the filesystem these are named IdenticalName.mp3, IdenticalName 1.mp3, IdenticalName 2.mp3, and so on.
I suspect iTunes is syncing the filename without a number postfix, and the file with the "1" postfix and not continuing with the rest of the files.
Has anyone seen similar behaviour? Did you find a workaround (other than renaming your tracks)?

can you manually discover the new instances on the new server?
Then just make sure the name that appears in Grid Control is different.
e.g. prod.world is on server A and B. When you discover in Grid control, you can make it prod_B and you will see the latter without any problem.

Writing to multiple tags with the same name

Hi,
I am writing to multiple tags with the same name but in different groups. I have noticed only the tag from the first group gets updated. How can I write to a tag in a specific group in this scenario?
Regards,
Chanti.

Heres what I found.
When I tried "http://<server>:<port>/XMII/Illuminator?Server=<Name of the TAG dataServer>&Mode=CurrentWrite&TagName=<Group>.<TagName>", the outcome was "Message
Could not add "<Group>.<TagName>" to the response list.
Message
No tags selected."
When I tried "http://<server>:<port>/XMII/Illuminator?Server=<Name of the TAG dataServer>&Mode=CurrentWrite&TagName=<TagName>", it seemed like it worked fine.
Any thoughts?

Encrypting an external disk with two partitions

I have a large external disk that I'm going to be using for Carbon Copy Cloner backups. I want the disk to have two partitions, and I want the whole thing to be encrypted with Full Disk Encryption. Should I (a) first partition the disk and then encrypt each partition, or (b) encrypt the physical disk and then partition the result? I think (a) is the best path (it looks like it's at least possible), but advice would be appreciated -- thanks!

Hi,
according to this http://support.mediafour.com/entries/170474-macdrive-compatibility-with-hard-dis ks-with-multiple-partition-types-i-e-dual-format that 'feature' is currently not supported by MAcDrive.
Regards
Stefan

Format - analyze - purge a disk with mounted partitions

I'm trying to format a machine with multiple disks. To do this, I've been instructed to run format, then analyze, then purge on each of the disks. Unfortunately, each disk has at least one mounted partition and when I try to run purge, I get the following message:
"Cannot do analysis on a mounted partition."
I've been able to get around this problem on all but one of the disks by using umount and making appropriate edits to /etc/cfstab. That said, I'm stuck on the first disk where mounts like / and /var exist. It's my understanding that you can't unmount / - if this is the case, how do I purge the disk where / is mounted?
Thanks,
David

You do realize the end result is that you will have no usable OS, right? If you do that's fine but I wanted to put that out there.
Reboot from install media and run the commands from there. They will be in the single user environment.
Cheers,
Edited by: John.Kotches on Apr 22, 2008 9:53 AM
Cleaned up spacing... Nothing to really see here.

Issue with multiple Albums with the same name. (i.e. Greatest Hits)

I have multiple albums all with the same name (i.e. Greatest Hits). iTunes mixes all of the albums as one. All of the track 1s together, all track 2s together .... Is there a way for iTunes to recognize that there is more than 1 album with the same name? and to keep each album seperate.
Thanks

You need to let iTunes know that they are different albums. The trick I use that work fine is to simply add the artist name of which it is the Greatest Hits in the "Album Artist".
That way, iTunes will keep your album together.

Mysterious disk with the same name and a prohibitory sign

I installed a hard drive named "Storage" at the optical drive of my MacBook Pro as a data drive (startup drive is "MBP2012"). Sometimes when I login the disk becomes "Storage 1" (although it shows up as "Storage"), and all the applications that automatically access data on Storage won't be able to find them. I go to /Volumes/ and find that there is a "Storage" disk already mounted before my real Storage disk, with a prohibitory sign:
Deleting the "Storage" with the prohibitory sign would bring my mac back to normal, but it happens again after a few days.
Anyone can help? Much appreciated.

A schema is just a collection of objects owned by a particular user. So you don't need to create a separate schema-- the schema is automatically created when you create the user.
In order to log in to the database, a user needs the CREATE SESSION privilege. In order to create a table, the user needs the CREATE TABLE privilege and needs to be granted enough quota on whatever tablespace the table will be created in. If you don't care about managing quota or restricting the tablespaces that a user can create tables in, you can grant the user the UNLIMITED TABLESPACE privilege. If you do care about managing quota, you'd need to run commands like
ALTER USER <<user name>>
QUOTA <<quota amount>>
ON <<tablespace name>>for each tablespace you want the user to be able to use.
Justin

Why do I see multiple users with the same name as an output of "users"

Recently, I found a peculiar thing when I typed "users" in the terminal. There were three users with the same name. After restart(power went down) I now see only one user there. Is this normal and why it can be happening? Why are there duplicate users sometimes?

alphaniner wrote:
Well now I'm confused. My xterm (xfce4-terminal) has that option disabled but I still get a user entry for each tab.
OT: you can run who to get a better idea of what each user is associated with. Eg. with Xorg on tty1 and terminal open with two tabs:
$ who
testing tty1 2013-12-11 08:55
testing pts/0 2013-12-11 08:55 (:0.0)
testing pts/1 2013-12-11 15:51 (:0.0)
Oh there is another option on mine besides "Run command as a login shell" called "Update login records when command is launched" I have them both disabled. Check for a second option maybe.

Multiple volumes with the same name

If I look at my /Volumes folder using Finder>Go>Go to Folder.. I see seven different volumes all starting with the same name:
MyName
MyName 1
MyName-1
MyName-2
MyName-3
MyName-4
MyName-5
(as well as my external drive and iMac HD)
MyName has a folder icon, and contains 1 folder called Backup which then has my 1Password.keychain in 7 different versions.
MyName 1 and MyName-1 are aliases and have icons for shared volumes. The only differences I can see are that in "MyName 1", the folders for Backup, Groups and Library are all displayed as aliases, whereas in "MyName-1" they are displayed as standard folders.
MyName-2 through MyName-5 all have folder icons and are empty.
I can understand that I could have a local and remote copy of my iDisk, hence the "MyName 1" and "MyName-1" volumes, but why all the others?
Should I delete any of MyName-2 through -5?
Is any of this slowing down iDisk syncing or searching?
Thanks in advance

I have the same problem
an external firewire drive "232 GB" is gaining an extra, sequentially numbered, mountpoint in /Volumes/ each time it is unplugged and re-plugged.
This is a bit of a pain as Xtorrent is downloading to a folder on this drive and so, whenever it is unplugged, I have to either;
restart all the downloads or,
before launching xtorrent, go into /volumes/ and delete the last mountpoint (so the system automatically adds the one Xtorrent is expecting)
just noticed you're in Sheffield too, maybe it's a local problem....
no idea what's causing it

Multiple lovs with the same name on the same module/form

I've noticed that in this case in a generated fmb LOVs get renamed so that first remains with the same name, next one gets 1 at the end, next one 2 and so on.
What I haven't found yet is the rule by which they are sorted, i.e. which one gets 1, which one 2, which one remains with the same name...
I've tried with the usage sequence of the LOVs but that seems to have no influence.
Anyone has any clues?

I have the same problem
an external firewire drive "232 GB" is gaining an extra, sequentially numbered, mountpoint in /Volumes/ each time it is unplugged and re-plugged.
This is a bit of a pain as Xtorrent is downloading to a folder on this drive and so, whenever it is unplugged, I have to either;
restart all the downloads or,
before launching xtorrent, go into /volumes/ and delete the last mountpoint (so the system automatically adds the one Xtorrent is expecting)
just noticed you're in Sheffield too, maybe it's a local problem....
no idea what's causing it

Multiple disks with identical partition names

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for