Multiple payment term with different day limit
We have three payment terms with multiple day limit. for example: ED11 (day limit 10), ED11 (25 day limit) and ED11 (32 days).
User enter just ED11 but i dont understand how system understand which out of the three is the require payment term.
Users feel that due date calculated is wrong. In most case it calculate the due date exactly based on the days mentioned in the payment term. In all cases, days mentioned are 90 days.
In one case, due date if it is (just 90 days) 30/04 but user feels it should be 10th May in the following (obviously he is reffering to ED11 daylimit 10). In this case, SAP calculate 90 days. Is it because of too many payment terms which same name.
Best,
Bala
Hi,
Please go and check the following path.If teh user wants no. of days as 10, then it should be maintained as 10 in the no. of days field in Payment terms. I think in your case it may be maintained as 90.
IMG->Finacial Accounting->General Ledger Accounting->Accounts Receivable and accounts Payable->Business Transactions->Outgoing Invoices/Credit memos->Maintain Terms of Payment->Check No. of days in Payment terms.
Assign points if u consider this to be useful.
Thanks,
Prithwiraj
Similar Messages
-
Payment term with fixed day but exclude weekends and holidays
Hello,
our customer has a requirement to have payment term that is like this:
Due date: fixed day 15th next month.
If due date falls in weekend or holiday due date will move to next business (working) day.
We have working payment term which is always the 15th on next month but it falls to weekends.
I was searching SDN found something but not working.
Could you please send me a step-by-step configuration how to exclude the weekends and holidays?
Thank you a lot.
Best regards,
LubosDear Lubos,
unfortunately waht You need to have It is impossible into the SAP Standard System.
Please be aware that the vendor invoice has two relevant dates:
Baseline date > INVFO-ZFBDT
Due on > INVFO-NETDF
The Baseline date is managed by the "Term of payment", transaction obb8, frame
"Baseline date calculation" where You can put for example :
Fixed day 30
Additional months 3
This means that if You put as Document date 01.01.2009, the baseline date
will be 30.04.2009 (fixed day 30, additional months 3).
The "Due on" date will start ALWAYS from "the Baseline date"
(that in my example is 30.04.2009) and according to the below
"Term of payment" , the System will add
31 days, so the Due on date will be 31.05.2009.
Term Percentage No. of days / Fixed date Additional months
1. % 31
2. %
3.
You could think to use the FI substitution to reach Your goal.
Mauri -
Hi All,
Could anybody will give bit explanation how will SAP will work in below Scenario:
Customer: X--- Assigned with Payment Term: ZB08
At OBB8, we defined two Paymet Term with ZB08, day limit are different. While posting document to vendor, which Payment Term i.e Payment term with Day limit will populate at document level.
Thanks inadvance.
Regards,
VenkatDear Srikanth,
Thanks for your immediate reply & valuable time.
I tried as you said, When i try to post Document on 06.05.2009 to vendor getting as below:
Payment Term: ZB08 Days/Percent: 40/2.125 50/ ( Blank)
In OBB8, we define as follows:
ZB08 ( 15 Day Limit)-- Default for Baseline is Posting Date-- 2.125--Fixdays 15 & Adition month 01
31 01
ZB08 ( 31 Day LImit)-- Default for baseline is Posting Date-- 2.125--Fixdays 31 Addtional Month 01
15 02
Could you explain me, Why SAP taking 40 instead of 15 & 30 days based on posting date?
Thanks inadvance.
Regards,
Venkat -
Multiple payment terms in PO/MIRO
Hi Experts,
I have a scenario where the business has multiple payment terms for different materials in the same PO/IR.
I tried using VSR but since the payment terms is at PO header it takes only one payment terms. Even if it does how can we handle this payment after invoice posting?
The invoice again has 2 material for same vendor with two different payment terms.
Regards,
SidI have a similar issue. PO set up for one large item, pay 30% upon order, so Due Upon Receipt and the balance owing is at NET 30, so 2 different sets of terms.
The vendor master carries the Terms over to the PO, however the PO terms can be changed and once changed these override the normal vendor master terms.
So on first PO for Product A - you specify terms as being Net 20
On 2nd PO for Product B - you can let the vendor terms come over Net 30
For you this will work as long as your vendor is able to split the invoices by product which they should do.
ON the MIRO side, for each invoice posted the terms can also be changed so if it was missed when doing the PO it can be corrected at IR. If your system is set for checking duplicate invoices and you have to put a combined product invoice into MIRO then you will have to alter the Reference field invoice number on the 2nd invoice. IE Inv#123-A & Inv#123-B etc. But you are best getting your vendor to invoice you by product. -
The same payment term with two different Day Limit
Hello Experts,
I have the same Payment terme AAAA: 45 days, end of the month for two different Day Limit (15 and 31)
2 calcul mode are possible :
1/ fixed date :31 + additional months :1
2/ fixed date :31 + additional months :2
Actually this is the second method in use and according to the informations I have it should be the first one.
Then the user for the 16/04/2010 as Baseline date, is expecting the end of May ( 16 + 45 days >> 31th of May > 31/05) But the system calculate it for the 30/06/2010.
I want to understand the settings and how to correct.
Thank you in advanceHello,
Need your answers -
Payment Term with fixed 10 days addition.
Hi,
I want to have a payment term KM00 which says "at sight".
But internally i want system to give a 15 days grace to customer. So for example:
If i post a entry today with Payment term KM00, it should give net due date 15 days after.
Plz suggest what needs to be done on Payment term configuration.
regardsOK leave the baseline date.
Against the payment terms "No of days " field enter 10 days
Therefore the due date will be 10 days after the baseline date, which you need to define to be either the entry date, posting date or document date.
Hope this helps
Award points if useful. -
Hello!
I try to create a payment terms with three disounts.
It s about a 90 days end of month on the tenth with 1 different discount for each of the 3 month.
Example :
Baseline date is 10 M-4
0,6 % disount if customers pay before the 30th M-3 of the due date
0,4% disount if customers pay before the 30th M-2 of the due date
0,2% discount if customers pay before the 30th of M-1 of the due date
due date is 10M
Two issues :
-First when i want to enter the payment (that i created) of a customers against a bill.
The disount taken in account on the payment is each time 0,6%, no matter how long the payment is made before the due line.
-second, how to create the 0,2% disount since there are only two lines in the disount customizing (by laying with the "day limit" criteria?)
Thank for your reply
Kind regards
Xavier
SAP FI consultantHello !
It does not reply to my question.
I had forgotten to say that i knew the 0BB8 transaction.
It s the one i use to enter the parameter but it does not work as i want it to.
Kind regards
xav -
Single invoice for multiple payment terms
Hi Friends,
I have given 2 different payment terms for 2 line items in single order and the billing is splitted due to this reason. I want to know where the system is checking this control. Because I want to create single Invoive even the payment terms are different. (The routine 003 under Data VBRK/VBRP in SO to Bill copy controls will be usefull only to create single Invoice for multiple SO's where the payment terms is same). But I need to create single Invoice even for multiple payment terms.
Can anyone suggest me at the earliest please.
KumarHi Kumar,
The Billing Split is take care at Copy control level.
For multiple line items in one single SO, with different Payment terms is not acceptable as per the business logic and its not best practices.
Please suggest the business to go on Split method only.
Or
Try to use Proforma Invoice Concept.
Regards
Srini -
Payment terms for different products from a single vendor
Hi Pundits,
Our client has a requirement to assign different payment terms for different products. Each product he buys from his vendor has it's own payment terms. He wants us to customize in such a way that when he/user enters the invoice, not only the vendor number is shown along with the product name but also the payment terms for that particular product are calculated.
I know that only one payment term can be assigned in the vendor master data. Is there anyway to get around this?
Creating the same vendor multiple times and assign payment terms looks a possible option but that looks quite hectic cause he has close to 1000 payment terms.Taurian, thank you for that suggestion!
I can maintain as many existing payment terms as the client has with his vendors and let him choose the payment terms at the time of invoice entry.
The only problem is that he might have to change it according to the current market rates for that product. So maintaining any payment term is of little use.
Edited by: Dummy_Variable on Aug 16, 2011 8:26 AM -
How to get PO and vendor payment term number of days??
Hi Experts,
I want to have a) Purchase order payment term number of days as well as
b) vendor Payment term number of days.
For a) For Purchase order payment term number of days I am using table EKKO and taking ZBD1T field which is giving payment
term number of days.
Is it correct??
b) vendor Payment term number of days I am using table LFB1 field Zterm to take payment term key not number of days.
Based on this key i will go to table T052 and find corresponding number of days as told MM consultants .
But this is not BW work. We need one single table from which we can take the field or enhance the current extractor
with that field.
So is there any other option for (b)
and Whether steps for (a) is correct???
Please confirm this.
Thanks in Advance,
Uday Shankar.For a) For Purchase order payment term number of days I am using table EKKO and taking ZBD1T field which is giving payment
term number of days.
Is it correct??
Payment terms for purchasing doesn't come delivered as part of the R3/ECC tables and is usually is added as a custom field to EKKO and populated via a User Exit. That looks to be the instance in your case because the field that you show as being the payment terms begins with a Z (custom fields begin with Y or Z). That appears, without being able to actually validate in your R3/ECC environment, to be the correct field to use. You would have to validate, however, with the end customer or your MM function consultant to be 100% certain. If this is the correct one to use, you're going to have to enhance the 2LIS_02_HDR extractor by enhancing the extraction structure and creating the User Exit to read it from EKKO and populate into the DataSource.
b) vendor Payment term number of days I am using table LFB1 field Zterm to take payment term key not number of days.
Based on this key i will go to table T052 and find corresponding number of days as told MM consultants .
But this is not BW work. We need one single table from which we can take the field or enhance the current extractor
with that field.
You can enhance the 2LIS_02_HDR extractor with the Vendor Payment Terms by joining the following in your User Exit:
EKKO-LIFNR = LFB1-LIFNR
EKKO-BUKRS = LFB1-BUKRS
LFB1-ZTERM = T052-ZTERM
This could either be done in a SELECT statement in the User Exit to do this equi join, or you could create a view on your R3/ECC environment and SELECT from that view. -
FI Gurus,
I recently created a new payment terms with a discount of 1 percent if paid within 10 days. Payable net if paid after. Everything has been going fine, up until I had a payment with a invoiced ate of Nov. 2008. I have the configuration to calculate the discount based on docuement date and not posting date. When I entered the invoice I even got a warning message that the discount for this invoice was expired. Which it gave me the confidence that I was on the right track. Then I went into the line item details and saw that the discount did not take place. But then when I went to pay the invoice thru BF system deducted the 1 percent. I then went to the account details and there was a discount showing. Did I missed anything during configuration?
Your suggestion will be greatly appreciated.Maximum cash discount was checked in FBZP
-
New payment terms with Due December 15th 2011
Dear All,
My business requirement is to create new payment terms with due date upto December 15th 2011 from the using of that payment terms,
Please suggest the step by step to create this kind of payment terms,
Thanks in advance,
SridharDear Sridhar Alleni,
For your requirement, i strongly feel that we will have to use more than one payment term.
Make following payment terms
(CLICK ON NEW ENTRIES OR COPY EXISTING PAYMENT TERMS AND MAINTAIN THE SETTINGS AS MENTIONED BELOW.)
PAYMENT TERM Z001 - DESCRIPTION : JULY TO DEC
Baseline calculation date
Fixed day : 15
Additional months : 5
Z002 - AUG TO DEC
Baseline calculation date
Fixed day : 15
Additional months : 4
Z003 - SEPT TO DEC
Baseline calculation date
Fixed day : 15
Additional months : 3
Z004 - OCT TO DEC
Baseline calculation date
Fixed day : 15
Additional months : 2
Z005 - NOV TO DEC
Baseline calculation date
Fixed day : 15
Additional months : 1
Z006 - DEC TO DEC MID
Baseline calculation date
Fixed day : 15
Additional months : 0
Instruct the users/business to use the corresponding payment term during each month.
i.e, If its oct month, ask them to use Z004 and likewise.
Please check and revert back.
Also if you are able to solve this in someother way, please update.
Thanks & Regards,
Hegal K Charles -
How can we maintain multiple payment terms for a customer
how can we maintain multiple payment terms for a customer?
Hi,
You can leave the Payment terms field in the sales area data tab blank. and you can enter the payment terms at line item level while creating the sales order. By that you will achieve multiple payment terms for the same customer in the same sales order. but the invoice will be split by standard SAP based on the payment terms.
Also difference between the "Payment Terms" field in Company code tab and the sales Area tab is.
Company code tab payment terms are used only for the documents that are posted directly in FI module. for example credit and debit memos posted directly in FI and as a leading practice this should always be "payable Immidiately"
Sales area Tab payment terms are the one which are copied on to the sales order header data which are valid for all the line items unless you specifically mention different payment terms at line item level.
Regards,
Shantanu -
Installment payment term with full tax in one installment
Hi,
I have a requirement where customer is looking for a payment term which is like this
1. X% of invoice amount + 100% VAT amount due to XX days
2. rest of invoice amount due in YY days (No Tax)
We can have a payment term with 'Installment Payments' to get the installements but I am not able to deal with Tax amount separately. Like I am able to do X% of (Invoice +Tax) in XX days and (100-X)% of (Invoice +Tax) in YY days, which is incorrect.
I would appreciate if you could help me with this requirement.
Regards,
HarpreetHi Srikanth,
Thanks for your suggestion.
I am looking for way in which two accounting documents are created automatically by the system having the desired values. Due to huge number of customer invoices which will need this, it will not be possible to handle it manually and will leave a room for error due to manual intervention.
If somehow we can configure this payment term in system, then it would really help
Regards
Harpreet -
Payment terms with 50% of value of the invoice in diferent dates
Hi Sap Gurus,
I would like to request your help for teh following issue.
We need to use a SAP condition that 50% of the invoice is payd immediatly and 50% in 30 days
How can do that?You have to create 3 payment terms
Ex:
1st step
create payment terms
Create 0005 payment term as Immediate
create 0006 payment term as 30 days due
create 0007 payment term as installment payment term (Here you need to check installment payment term)
2nd step
create installment payment terms
create 0007 50% with 0005 payment term
create 0007 50% with 0006 payment term
I think your problem will be solved
thanks ®ards
shankar chitupolu
Edited by: chitupolushankar on Oct 24, 2011 6:09 PM
Maybe you are looking for
-
How can I get the apple configurator to retain a devices settings and apps?
Hi there all! I have an iPhone that already has apps and email settings on it. I want to use the configurator to stop the device being paired with anything else not allow it to connect to any other Macs. I've connected it, backed it up, enabled sup
-
Mass Closure of Purchase Orders
I need to mass close Purchase Orders. I can do this using which T-Code?
-
Hi guys, I have a problem with a query in an upgrade. In the old version it works OK, but i get a short dump when i try to execute this in te new 6.0 version. I've checket the infoset and the it activates without problem. But when i go to see one of
-
Renaming the Selection Text of LDB PCH
Hi - Can anyone suggest a way to Rename the Standard Selection Screen Variable Name ( Selection Text in a Standard Selection Screen ) of a LDB ( PCH )to a custom one ? Eg. There is a need to change the Object ID ( PCHOBJID - Selection Text ) to " Or
-
Slider: PDF presentations
UPDATE Slider has been reborn (8 Apr 2013). I've continued the discussion in this thread starting here. Note that all discussion up to that point likely no longer applies to what is currently on github. Slider is a PDF presentation / slideshow tool