Multiple Records to RFC !

Hi,
Our scenario --> JBDC -- XI -- RFC.
1) Here Sender JDBC Selects the multiple records from the Oracle DB.
2) These bunch of records are sent to the RFC for processing and reponse messages are expected.
3) But while in production due to huge amount of records from the Oracle Database the RFC takes more time to reponse back.
Now is it a pass each record once into RFC to process to make the response back soon.
So each and every record has to be passed one after the other.
Can any one say how RFC is gettings executed if it sent as set of file (0.. unbound)
any views for incresing the performance. because we suspect for time out problems
thxs in advance
rgds
srini

Hi
Thanks for reply.
Is there any way where in can process each record of Outbound Interface.
Ex Order
         1a)Key01
         2a) Item01
         3a) Item02
         1b)Key02
         2b) Item01
         3b) Item02
Above is the Outbound Interface structure after Select done by Sender JBDC.
Now instead of sending entire records of 1a and 1b into (0 .. unbound) of my RFC import.
Can first pass 1a to RFC process it for response and then sent 1b.??
thx
rgds
srini

Similar Messages

Multiple Records in RFC

Hi Experts,
Is it possible to accept multiple records(Having same structure) under Import in RFC.
If it is possible tell me how to read the multiple records.Send me the code.
Regards,
Raj.

maybe look inside SAP ...

Send multiple records to rfc without using BPM

Dear Experts,
Could you please help on the following scenario.
I need to send multiple customer master data records from a file to rfc without using BPM.
The following is the mapping i am using
source Target( RFC)
====== =============
Tree occurance type Tree occurance
cust_mt 1..1
 customer 0..unbound -
> ztest_cust( rfc ) 1..1
 cname 1..1 -
> cname 0..1
 cno 1..1 -
> cno 0..1
 bank -
> bank 0..1
 item : 0..unbound
 code -
> code 0..1
 name -
> name 0..1
 location -
> location 0..1
1. Multiple banks possible for one customer
2. Multiple customers possible in datafile from mdm
Problem 1:Only one customer record from file is being sent to RFC thouth many records are in the file, the second, third .. and so on records not being sent to rfc.
Problem 2:
if add o.. unbound for the rfc occurance, <messages>,<message1> tags are getting added in message mapping, and no single customer record sent to rfc..
Your help is rewarded with good points.
Appreciate your help.
Thanks.
sravya.

Hi VJ,
Thank you for the immediate reply.
one more thing, when i tried to change the occurences of ztest_cust( rfc) to 0..unbound,
I am not seeing the occurances updated in the imported rfc structure.
The following is the wsdl for rfc, could you please help me to add occurances 0..unbound.
Thanks a lot.
sraya.
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>
<wsdl:definitions xmlns:wsdl="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/wsdl/" xmlns:rfc="urn:sap-com:document:sap:rfc:functions" name="ZTEST_CUST" targetNamespace="urn:sap-com:document:sap:rfc:functions">
 <wsdl:documentation>
 test for mdm
 </wsdl:documentation>
 <wsdl:types>
 <xsd:schema xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" xmlns="urn:sap-com:document:sap:rfc:functions" targetNamespace="urn:sap-com:document:sap:rfc:functions">
 <xsd:element name="ZTEST_CUST">
 <xsd:complexType>
 <xsd:all>
 <xsd:element name="CNAME" minOccurs="0">
 <xsd:simpleType>
 <xsd:restriction base="xsd:string">
 <xsd:maxLength value="10" />
 </xsd:restriction>
 </xsd:simpleType>
 </xsd:element>
 <xsd:element name="CNO" minOccurs="0">
 <xsd:simpleType>
 <xsd:restriction base="xsd:string">
 <xsd:maxLength value="10" />
 </xsd:restriction>
 </xsd:simpleType>
 </xsd:element>
 <xsd:element name="BANK" minOccurs="0">
 <xsd:complexType>
 <xsd:sequence>
 <xsd:element name="item" type="ZST_CUST" minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="unbounded" />
 </xsd:sequence>
 </xsd:complexType>
 </xsd:element>
 </xsd:all>
 </xsd:complexType>
 </xsd:element>
 <xsd:element name="ZTEST_CUST.Response">
 <xsd:complexType>
 <xsd:all>
 <xsd:element name="BANK" minOccurs="0">
 <xsd:complexType>
 <xsd:sequence>
 <xsd:element name="item" type="ZST_CUST" minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="unbounded" />
 </xsd:sequence>
 </xsd:complexType>
 </xsd:element>
 </xsd:all>
 </xsd:complexType>
 </xsd:element>
 <xsd:complexType name="ZST_CUST">
 <xsd:sequence>
 <xsd:element name="CODE" minOccurs="0">
 <xsd:simpleType>
 <xsd:restriction base="xsd:string">
 <xsd:maxLength value="60" />
 </xsd:restriction>
 </xsd:simpleType>
 </xsd:element>
 <xsd:element name="NAME" minOccurs="0">
 <xsd:simpleType>
 <xsd:restriction base="xsd:string">
 <xsd:maxLength value="60" />
 </xsd:restriction>
 </xsd:simpleType>
 </xsd:element>
 <xsd:element name="LOCATION" minOccurs="0">
 <xsd:simpleType>
 <xsd:restriction base="xsd:string">
 <xsd:maxLength value="60" />
 </xsd:restriction>
 </xsd:simpleType>
 </xsd:element>
 </xsd:sequence>
 </xsd:complexType>
 </xsd:schema>
 </wsdl:types>
 <wsdl:message name="ZTEST_CUST.Input">
 <wsdl:part name="parameters" element="rfc:ZTEST_CUST" />
 </wsdl:message>
 <wsdl:message name="ZTEST_CUST.Output">
 <wsdl:part name="parameters" element="rfc:ZTEST_CUST.Response" />
 </wsdl:message>
 <wsdl:portType name="ZTEST_CUST.PortType">
 <wsdl:operation name="ZTEST_CUST">
 <wsdl:input message="rfc:ZTEST_CUST.Input" />
 <wsdl:output message="rfc:ZTEST_CUST.Output" />
 </wsdl:operation>
 </wsdl:portType>
 <wsdl:binding name="ZTEST_CUST.SAPBinding" type="rfc:ZTEST_CUST.PortType">
 <rfc:binding style="rfc" />
 <rfc:type name="ZST_CUST">
 <ifr:container xmlns:ifr="urn:sap-com:ifr:v2:metamodel" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
 <ifr:descriptor>
 <ifr:description language="EN">
 test
 </ifr:description>
 </ifr:descriptor>
 <ifr:properties>
 <ifr:sourceSystem />
 <ifr:sourceClient>
 020
 </ifr:sourceClient>
 <ifr:release>
 640
 </ifr:release>
 <ifr:category>
 structure
 </ifr:category>
 <ifr:unicode1>
 true
 </ifr:unicode1>
 <ifr:unicode2>
 true
 </ifr:unicode2>
 <ifr:isFlatStructure>
 true
 </ifr:isFlatStructure>
 </ifr:properties>
 <ifr:definition>
 <ifr:internalLength1>
 180
 </ifr:internalLength1>
 <ifr:internalLength2>
 360
 </ifr:internalLength2>
 <ifr:fields>
 <ifr:field name="CODE" category="simple">
 <ifr:descriptor />
 <ifr:properties>
 <ifr:helpValuesSupported>
 false
 </ifr:helpValuesSupported>
 <ifr:offset1>
 0
 </ifr:offset1>
 <ifr:offset2>
 0
 </ifr:offset2>
 </ifr:properties>
 <ifr:definition>
 <ifr:scalarType>
 <ifr:definition>
 <ifr:type>
 CHAR
 </ifr:type>
 <ifr:abapType>
 C
 </ifr:abapType>
 <ifr:length>
 60
 </ifr:length>
 <ifr:internalLength1>
 60
 </ifr:internalLength1>
 <ifr:internalLength2>
 120
 </ifr:internalLength2>
 <ifr:decimals>
 0
 </ifr:decimals>
 </ifr:definition>
 </ifr:scalarType>
 </ifr:definition>
 </ifr:field>
 <ifr:field name="NAME" category="simple">
 <ifr:descriptor />
 <ifr:properties>
 <ifr:helpValuesSupported>
 false
 </ifr:helpValuesSupported>
 <ifr:offset1>
 60
 </ifr:offset1>
 <ifr:offset2>
 120
 </ifr:offset2>
 </ifr:properties>
 <ifr:definition>
 <ifr:scalarType>
 <ifr:definition>
 <ifr:type>
 CHAR
 </ifr:type>
 <ifr:abapType>
 C
 </ifr:abapType>
 <ifr:length>
 60
 </ifr:length>
 <ifr:internalLength1>
 60
 </ifr:internalLength1>
 <ifr:internalLength2>
 120
 </ifr:internalLength2>
 <ifr:decimals>
 0
 </ifr:decimals>
 </ifr:definition>
 </ifr:scalarType>
 </ifr:definition>
 </ifr:field>
 <ifr:field name="LOCATION" category="simple">
 <ifr:descriptor />
 <ifr:properties>
 <ifr:helpValuesSupported>
 false
 </ifr:helpValuesSupported>
 <ifr:offset1>
 120
 </ifr:offset1>
 <ifr:offset2>
 240
 </ifr:offset2>
 </ifr:properties>
 <ifr:definition>
 <ifr:scalarType>
 <ifr:definition>
 <ifr:type>
 CHAR
 </ifr:type>
 <ifr:abapType>
 C
 </ifr:abapType>
 <ifr:length>
 60
 </ifr:length>
 <ifr:internalLength1>
 60
 </ifr:internalLength1>
 <ifr:internalLength2>
 120
 </ifr:internalLength2>
 <ifr:decimals>
 0
 </ifr:decimals>
 </ifr:definition>
 </ifr:scalarType>
 </ifr:definition>
 </ifr:field>
 </ifr:fields>
 </ifr:definition>
 </ifr:container>
 </rfc:type>
 <wsdl:operation name="ZTEST_CUST">
 <ifr:container xmlns:ifr="urn:sap-com:ifr:v2:metamodel" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
 <ifr:descriptor>
 <ifr:description language="EN">
 test for mdm
 </ifr:description>
 </ifr:descriptor>
 <ifr:properties>
 <ifr:sourceSystem />
 <ifr:sourceClient>
 020
 </ifr:sourceClient>
 <ifr:release>
 640
 </ifr:release>
 <ifr:package>
 $TMP
 </ifr:package>
 <ifr:akhNode />
 <ifr:released>
 external
 </ifr:released>
 <ifr:outbound>
 false
 </ifr:outbound>
 <ifr:synchronous>
 true
 </ifr:synchronous>
 <ifr:asynchronous>
 false
 </ifr:asynchronous>
 <ifr:unicode1>
 true
 </ifr:unicode1>
 <ifr:unicode2>
 true
 </ifr:unicode2>
 </ifr:properties>
 <ifr:definition>
 <ifr:parameters>
 <ifr:parameter name="CNAME">
 <ifr:descriptor>
 <ifr:description language="EN">
 Character Field Length = 10
 </ifr:description>
 </ifr:descriptor>
 <ifr:definition>
 <ifr:scalarType name="CHAR10">
 <ifr:properties>
 <ifr:helpValuesSupported>
 false
 </ifr:helpValuesSupported>
 <ifr:fixedValuesListDefined>
 false
 </ifr:fixedValuesListDefined>
 <ifr:mixedCaseSupported>
 false
 </ifr:mixedCaseSupported>
 <ifr:signedNumber>
 false
 </ifr:signedNumber>
 </ifr:properties>
 <ifr:definition>
 <ifr:type>
 CHAR
 </ifr:type>
 <ifr:abapType>
 C
 </ifr:abapType>
 <ifr:length>
 10
 </ifr:length>
 <ifr:internalLength1>
 10
 </ifr:internalLength1>
 <ifr:internalLength2>
 20
 </ifr:internalLength2>
 <ifr:decimals>
 0
 </ifr:decimals>
 <ifr:outputLength>
 10
 </ifr:outputLength>
 </ifr:definition>
 </ifr:scalarType>
 </ifr:definition>
 <ifr:properties>
 <ifr:direction>
 in
 </ifr:direction>
 <ifr:class>
 import
 </ifr:class>
 <ifr:type>
 scalar
 </ifr:type>
 <ifr:optional>
 true
 </ifr:optional>
 <ifr:basedOnDictionaryReference>
 true
 </ifr:basedOnDictionaryReference>
 </ifr:properties>
 </ifr:parameter>
 <ifr:parameter name="CNO">
 <ifr:descriptor>
 <ifr:description language="EN">
 Character Field Length = 10
 </ifr:description>
 </ifr:descriptor>
 <ifr:definition>
 <ifr:scalarType name="CHAR10">
 <ifr:properties>
 <ifr:helpValuesSupported>
 false
 </ifr:helpValuesSupported>
 <ifr:fixedValuesListDefined>
 false
 </ifr:fixedValuesListDefined>
 <ifr:mixedCaseSupported>
 false
 </ifr:mixedCaseSupported>
 <ifr:signedNumber>
 false
 </ifr:signedNumber>
 </ifr:properties>
 <ifr:definition>
 <ifr:type>
 CHAR
 </ifr:type>
 <ifr:abapType>
 C
 </ifr:abapType>
 <ifr:length>
 10
 </ifr:length>
 <ifr:internalLength1>
 10
 </ifr:internalLength1>
 <ifr:internalLength2>
 20
 </ifr:internalLength2>
 <ifr:decimals>
 0
 </ifr:decimals>
 <ifr:outputLength>
 10
 </ifr:outputLength>
 </ifr:definition>
 </ifr:scalarType>
 </ifr:definition>
 <ifr:properties>
 <ifr:direction>
 in
 </ifr:direction>
 <ifr:class>
 import
 </ifr:class>
 <ifr:type>
 scalar
 </ifr:type>
 <ifr:optional>
 true
 </ifr:optional>
 <ifr:basedOnDictionaryReference>
 true
 </ifr:basedOnDictionaryReference>
 </ifr:properties>
 </ifr:parameter>
 <ifr:parameter name="BANK">
 <ifr:descriptor>
 <ifr:description language="EN">
 test bank type
 </ifr:description>
 </ifr:descriptor>
 <ifr:definition>
 <ifr:complexType xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" name="ZST_CUST" type="structure" xlink:role="type" xlink:href="/Content?TYPE=type&NAME=ZST_CUST" />
 </ifr:definition>
 <ifr:properties>
 <ifr:direction>
 inout
 </ifr:direction>
 <ifr:class>
 tables
 </ifr:class>
 <ifr:type>
 structure
 </ifr:type>
 <ifr:optional>
 true
 </ifr:optional>
 <ifr:basedOnDictionaryReference>
 true
 </ifr:basedOnDictionaryReference>
 </ifr:properties>
 </ifr:parameter>
 </ifr:parameters>
 </ifr:definition>
 </ifr:container>
 </wsdl:operation>
 </wsdl:binding>
</wsdl:definitions>

What Changes is Reqd in Int. Process to proces Multiple record by 1..1 RFC

HI Sdner,
File - ECC - RFC (Sync) - Currently File / But This can be Other System also.
I have Done this By BPM .
File - Receiver Step - Sender Step (Sync) - Sender Step - File .
and this is running fine for single record.
But Now Problem is RFC is with 1..1 Occurence .. So it cannot take more then 1 record ... so on Receiver I am getting only response record in Response File.
What Changes is Reqd in Integration Process to process Multiple record by RFC of 1..1 Occurence type.
or what is the approach ..................for ID and Inetegration Process in ESR.
I know we can go with Other Approach Like Proxy and Module Proccer .. But I am following Strictly BPM approach ...
Because We have Similar More Scenarios ..even More Complex ..
Regards
Prabhat Sharma,

HI nagarjuna,
italics
you want a solution with current scenario, you can try this-
Go to messages tab and change the occurance to 0..unbounded for RFC in file-RFC mapping. Now you have 1:n mapping.
The RFC root tag has to be mapped with record set of your file structure.Now the n RFC calls will be generated on executing this mapping.
In your BPM part make the following changes-
Add one more send step after the receive step and call the 1:n mapping transformation.
The sync send step should be placed in a 'ForEach' block.
So for each record in file a sync RFC call will be executed and the file is appended with respose code everytime.
italics
If you can explain this some more ...
Or If you can provide me some Blog .... or screen shot of Integration Process/ Service Interface / Receiver Determination / Interface Determination..
That would be helpful.

Multiple records of table from RFC to XI in single XML file

Hi
My Scenario is as following -->
RFC ---> Sender RFC Adapter ---> XI -
> Rec SOAP adapter ---> Web Service
Now we need multiple records from RFC which can be put in single XML file & XI can transport the whole XML file to Web Service. All the configuration in XI, Web Service is complete & I tested my mapping which is able to accept multiple records.
But when ABAPer is sending the records I am not getting it in XI, I checked that in message payload from RFC.
He put the table name in TABLE tab of RFC. But not under Import Tab, as whatever he is providing under Import parameter & exporting it through report I am getting in message payload but not the table data.
Did anyone try such scenario, can you tell me how can we achieve this.
Pls. provide me your mail ID in case you need an attachment of the current RFC & report code & my mapping snapshot.
Regards
- lalit -

Hi
We have created the BAPI in which we are just describing the structure of the payload & which I am importing in Integration Repository.
And we are calling this BAPI from another program using " Call function ... " command & also provinding the data in that program.
Actually ethically ABAPers are against the idea of provinding the data into program they would like to provide it in BAPI but that won't work, you have to provide data in program which in turn populate the fields of BAPI.
Let me know with your mail ID in case you need snapshot of function & programs.
Regards
- Lalit -

File to RFC with multiple records using BPM Scenario Error...!!!

Hello Guru's,
I have done the File to RFC with multiple records using BPM scenario as per the Materiel available in the sdn.sap. This involves BAPI (BAPI_MATERIEL_AVAILABILITY). I have done exactly the same what is their in the materiel. SXI_CACHE is also giving return value " 0 ". File is getting deleted from the source directory, but no file in target directory. SXMB_MONI is also showing no error (black Flag). BPM is also error free. Checked the interfaces also.
Can any one tell me what mistake would i have done.
Thanks in advance.

Hi,
There is one similar discussion I found,
FTP TO RFC using BPM
Thanks
Swarup

Multiple records are not loaded   in FILE to RFC scenario

Hi   ,
     I did File- to-RFC scenario.. it was working fine.. but the problem is... from my file.. it was loading the first record only into the R/3 database.. what i have to do.. i'm new to XI..
generally a file must conatin multiple records.. but my scenario was performing.. that was loading only the first record of my file.. and remaining records it wa skipping..
plz provide me the solution..
Thanks
Babu

Hi
In message mapping, change the occurrence of the RFC to be 0 to unbounded.
Map the root node of the file xml structure to the RFC's root node.
In the interface mapping after selecting the source and the target message interface,change the occurrence of the target interface to 0 to unbounded i.e.RFC .
While doing the interface determination, you will find an option called Enhanced / Extended Select this and then select the Interface mapping.
Thanks

RFC to JDBC Scenario: Multiple Records insertion

Hi All,
I am working with RFC->XI->JDBC to update a single table on an Oracle db.
When I import RFC I get multiple Records.
Here is the sender XML Structure:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
- <rfc:Z_I2_SAP2MDM_VM xmlns:rfc="urn:sap-com:document:sap:rfc:functions">
+ <I_LFA1>
</I_LFA1>
<T_XLFAT />
- <T_XWYT3>
- <item>
<MANDT>800</MANDT>
<LIFNR>0000009962</LIFNR>
<EKORG>1000</EKORG>
<LTSNR />
<WERKS />
<PARVW>LF</PARVW>
<PARZA>000</PARZA>
<ERNAM>ARUCHI</ERNAM>
<ERDAT>2006-05-26</ERDAT>
<LIFN2>0000009962</LIFN2>
<DEFPA />
<PERNR>00000000</PERNR>
<PARNR>0000000000</PARNR>
<KZ>I</KZ>
</item>
- <item>
<MANDT>800</MANDT>
<LIFNR>0000009962</LIFNR>
<EKORG>1000</EKORG>
<LTSNR />
<WERKS />
<PARVW>RS</PARVW>
<PARZA>001</PARZA>
<ERNAM>ARUCHI</ERNAM>
<ERDAT>2006-05-26</ERDAT>
<LIFN2>0000009962</LIFN2>
<DEFPA />
<PERNR>00000000</PERNR>
<PARNR>0000000000</PARNR>
<KZ>I</KZ>
</item>
</T_XWYT3>
</rfc:Z_I2_SAP2MDM_VM>
It takes only the first <item> record. How do i take the second record and insert in the oracel DB.
Seems to me this should be a pretty simple process.
Regards,
Ruchi

Hi ,
You need to handle this with the occurence of the Target Structure of the JDBC Adapter..
Check this help-
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw2004s/helpdata/en/2e/96fd3f2d14e869e10000000a155106/content.htm
DB Datatype structure ?
Hope this helps,
Regards,
Moorthy

Http-xi-RFC synchronous call - multiple records ?

Hi Gurus,
Can we have multiple records processing in RFC synchronous call ? for ex, BAPI_COMPANY_GET_DETAIL. I want to feed multiple company ids and get the responses in browser.
I have changed cardinality in message mapping and interface mapping as o to unbounded. Tested the same which works fine.
But, when I activated the interface mapping, I get an error which says I can not use multi mapping in synchronous RFC call.
what is the alternative ? please help.

HI,
It is better to use the RFC lookup in mapping and get the multiple records , i men each one for one lookup , so that in your mapping use UDF for RFC lookup.
see the below link
Lookup - /people/alessandro.guarneri/blog/2006/03/27/sap-xi-lookup-api-the-killer
Also read thru this to get more idea on lookups - http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/cf/406642ea59c753e10000000a1550b0
Lookups in XI made simpler - /people/siva.maranani/blog/2005/08/23/lookup146s-in-xi-made-simpler
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/2e/96fd3f2d14e869e10000000a155106/content.htm
/people/prasad.illapani/blog/2006/10/25/how-to-check-jdbc-sql-query-syntax-and-verify-the-query-results-inside-a-user-defined-function-of-the-lookup-api
Lookups - /people/morten.wittrock/blog/2006/03/30/wrapping-your-mapping-lookup-api-code-in-easy-to-use-java-classes
Lookups - /people/alessandro.guarneri/blog/2006/03/27/sap-xi-lookup-api-the-killer
Lookups with XSLT - https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/8e7daa90-0201-0010-9499-cd347ffbbf72
Regards
Chilla

File to rfc (file has multiple records)

Hi Guys,
I have a filr to rfc scenario..
I created a Z table with ITAB in import tab and field names and then a BAPi using se37...
The BAPI source code is just one line
Modify Ztable from ITAB
I first tried wth input file having one record, and in scenario runs successfully to update the Z table, checked in se 16
Now when the input file has more than one record, but ZBAPI has just 1..1 ITAB tab
Ho can I do multiple inserts using the same rfc/bapi??
Regards,
Teja

Hi,
As Prateek suggested 2 opionts, so I think option 2 is best for your otherwise option 1 can lead into performance issues.
Make sure that you have declard your internal table ITAB as standard table of ztable. e.g.
DATA: ITAB type standard table of ztable,
WA_ITAB type ztable.
if you do like this and import the BAPI in XI then you can see the occurence of target has been changed as 0..unbounded
Finally, when you have multiple records in your internal table then loop on it and update the table. e.g.
Loop at itab into wa_itab.
Modify Ztable from WA_ITAB.
Clear:wa_itab.
Endloop.
Regards,
Sarvesh

Multiple records to R/3 via RFC.

Hi
Can we design the possible solutions for updating multiple records to R/3 via RFC.
Assume the scenario .CSV to R/3.
Is there any possible way please help me out.
Thanks
Venkat Anil
Edited by: Venkat Anil Gannavarapu on Jul 30, 2008 7:13 AM

Hi,
Check this links.
http://www.saptechies.com/multiple-occurrence-of-file-to-single-occurrence-of-rfc/
Regards,
Phani

How can I call multiple records(40) at same time as webservice ?

Hi All
My scenario is some thing like calling SOAP(Webservice) to Rfc(BAPI)
Thing is how can i call multiple records at the same time using the SOAP
adapter i.e i need to make a request to BAPI and in the BAPI response
based on the fields, i need to send to different records....it is Sync call
Can any explain me how to implement this scenario ?
Regards
Kiran lvs

HI,
Please see the below link
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/42/ed364cf8593eebe10000000a1553f7/content.htm
Regards
Chilla..

How to select multiple records from a TREE in the table

HI,
I have a tree structure which is in the table.When I open the node of the tree,all the subnodes are coming as one-one records in the table.I want to slect multiple record from this table.I applied onLeadSelect for this table,I can select only 1 record from the table.
Can any one plz suggest me how to select multiple records from the table so that I can get all the data of those selected record.
Regards
-Sandip

Rashmi/Kukku,
First of all, Thanks for your help!
Is there any other way in which we can access tables other than using BAPIs or RFCs?
In my case, there is a table structure which has to be updated with values after validating a key. i don't think there is any RFC available now. do i need to create bapi/rfc for that?
Krishna Murthy

Multi-mapping ... multiple records works, one record doesn't

I'm using JDBC to select rows from an external Oracle database, XI receives the message, splits it into multiple messages (one for each record returned) and, using RFC/BAPI, takes each record and writes it to an SAP table on an SAP system. I'm using the RB_SPLIT option in my Interface Determination and in my Interface Mapping I'm using Source occurrences = 1, Target occurrences = 0..unbounded.
This works GREAT ... as long as there is more than one record returned from the select statement in the JDBC setup. If the select statement only returns one record, nothing gets transferred. If it's any amount of records more than 1, it works perfectly.
Why won't it process one record? What can I do to get it to process one record, without messing up the great job it does for more than one record?
Thanks!

Hi Michael -
I have a similar setup (at least on the sender side) and whether I have multiple records returned or just one, I'm getting my expected result. FYI, I'm using a file receiver.
I would first take a closer look at your mapping. Get the one record XML that is sent to the Integration Server and test your message mapping in the IR. Remember to put it in between the tags below:
<ns0:Messages xmlns:ns0="http://sap.com/xi/XI/SplitAndMerge">
<ns0:Message1>
</ns0:Message1>
</ns0:Messages>
Regards,
Jin

Multiple records in BPM using Switch

Hi Frnds,
I was doing File to RFC to Webservice sceanrio using multiple records.
For that i have used
ReceiveTransformation-Block(ForEach)-Send Sync-ContainerEndBlock-TransformationSendTransformation(Multimapping)-Block-switch-sendsync-containerendblock-Transformation---send.
In switch, i was checking the condition like, if the material is present, then it got the first branch or else it should go to next branch.
In switch i was facing the problem, if i give multiple records with the same value, i am getting the output. If i give different values like for one record, material is present and the other record material is not present, then i am not getting the output.
Could you please help in this issue.

In switch i was facing the problem, if i give multiple records with the same value, i am getting the output
The standard behaviour of Switch is that in case of multiple records, the Last Record value is taken and checked with the switch condition.
U break all the records into individual records usinf "Recordset per message = 1" or transform one message with multiple records into multiple records, save it into multiline container variable and then use Block with mode ForEach.
Regards,
Prateek

Multiple Records to RFC !

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for