NBAR & BGP

I'm trying to use "match protocol bgp" command in a class-map in order to classify all BGP routing traffic, but it doesn't match.
When I try to do the same using an ACL matching tcp 179 in the same class-map configuration it works.
Any suggestion?
Regards
Fabio

ip cef
class-map match-any SILVER
match protocol bgp
policy-map LLQ
class SILVER
bandwidth 150
interface ATM0/0.1 point-to-point
ip nbar protocol-discovery
pvc 8/35
service-policy output LLQ
As you can see in the configuration The outputs below show TEST-2651XM-ADSL#sh policy-map Class-map: SILVER (match-any)
0 packets, 0 bytes
30 second offered Match: protocol bgp
0 packets, 0 bytes
30 second rate 0 bps
TEST-2651XM-ADSL#sh ip ATM0/0.1
Input Protocol Byte Count snmp 229270 19069945 3000 telnet 2316 122848 1000 icmp 4395 421864 0 bgp 0 0 0 I'm using the IOS release:
(C2600-IS-M), ver.12.2(15)T12 extract above the commands you suggested are applied.
that bgp packets have no match:
int atm 0/0.1
rate 0 bps, drop rate 0 bps
nbar protocol-discovery int atm 0/0.1
Output
Packet Count Packet Count
Byte Count
30 second bit rate (bps) 30 second bit rate (bps)
12936
1528680
0
3
162
0
313
29488
0
0
0
0

Similar Messages

Snmp/bgp traps

Hi
Is there anyway of limiting the type of traps to be sent to a particular SNMP management station? When I enable snmp-server enable trap ds1 e.g., I would only like that type of trap to go to SNMP Server A and not SNMP Server B. Can't think of any way myself?
Regards
Mary

Hi Farrukh
When I type the command snmp-server host 10.50.1.228 traps snmp ? , I get the traps below but not linkup linkdown. The router is running flash:c2800nm-entservicesk9-mz.124-7a.bin. Output of what I see below.
Router_A#(config)#snmp-server host 10.50.1.228 traps snmp ?
atm Allow SNMP atm traps
bgp Allow BGP state change traps
bstun Allow bstun event traps
bulkstat Allow Data-Collection-MIB traps
cnpd Allow NBAR Protocol Discovery traps
config Allow SNMP config traps
config-copy Allow SNMP config-copy traps
cpu Allow cpu related traps
dlsw Allow dlsw traps
dnis Allow SNMP DNIS traps
ds0-busyout Allow ds0-busyout traps
ds1 Allow SNMP ds1 traps
ds1-loopback Allow ds1-loopback traps
ds3 Allow SNMP ds3 traps
dsp Allow SNMP DSP traps
dspu Allow dspu event traps
eigrp Allow SNMP EIGRP traps
entity Allow SNMP entity traps
envmon Allow environmental monitor traps
event-manager Allow SNMP Embedded Event Manager traps
flash Allow SNMP FLASH traps
frame-relay Allow SNMP frame-relay traps
hsrp Allow SNMP HSRP traps
icsudsu Allow SNMP ICSUDSU traps
ipmobile Allow SNMP ipmobile traps
ipmulticast Allow SNMP ipmulticast traps
isdn Allow SNMP ISDN traps
l2tun-session Allow SNMP L2 tunnel protocol traps
mpls-ldp Allow SNMP MPLS label distribution protocol traps
mpls-traffic-eng Allow SNMP MPLS traffic engineering traps
mpls-vpn Allow SNMP MPLS Virtual Private Network traps
msdp Allow SNMP MSDP traps
mvpn Allow Multicast Virtual Private Network traps
ospf Allow OSPF traps
pim Allow SNMP PIM traps
rsrb Allow rsrb event traps
rsvp Allow RSVP flow change traps
rtr Allow SNMP Response Time Reporter traps
sdlc Allow sdlc event traps
sdllc Allow sdllc event traps
snmp Allow SNMP-type notifications
stun Allow stun event traps
syslog Allow SNMP syslog traps
tty Allow TCP connection traps
udp-port The notification host's UDP port number
voice Allow SNMP Voice traps
vrrp Allow SNMP vrrp traps
vsimaster Allow SNMP vsimaster traps
vtp Allow SNMP VTP traps
x25 Allow x25 event traps
xgcp Allow XGCP protocol traps
Any ideas?
Regards
Mary

BGP Peer state on ASR1002

Hi,
Does anyone know what is the OID to check BGP peer state on ASR1002? I tried 1.3.6.1.2.1.15.3.1.2 but that doesn't work
Thanks

Hi Paul,
I have 2 routers configured and directely connected with ISP using /29 address.
ISP link -> switch -> vrrp address router (A/B)
Master Router:
interface GigabitEthernet0/1.A
encapsulation dot1Q A
ip address A.A.A.253 255.255.255.248
ip nbar protocol-discovery
ip flow ingress
vrrp 200 ip A.A.A.250
vrrp 200 timers advertise 1
vrrp 200 preempt delay minimum 160
vrrp 200 priority 150
vrrp 200 authentication md5 key-string 7 **
[ ]'s

Multi-Instance BGP

BGP Multi-instance was supposed to be released in XR 4.2, I could not find any mention of it in the Release notes for 4.2, 4.3, & 5.1?
How do I find out if it was implemented and if so how to configure it, if not if it is still on the road map?
Thanks,
John

Hello,
It is in release note XR .4.2:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/routers/asr9000/software/asr9k_r4.2/general/release/notes/reln_a9k_42.html
And some writing on Cisco doc:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/routers/crs/software/crs_r4.2/routing/configuration/guide/b_routing_cg42crs_chapter_01.html#concept_E6B1D3D6B8CA4742AED837B3A94E826F
Below is the example what i did in my lab running 4.2.3:
RP/0/RSP1/CPU0:ASR-9006-01#show run router bgp
Fri Jan 31 21:05:02.170 UTC
router bgp 1 instance IPV4
bgp router-id 72.15.48.5
bgp graceful-restart
ibgp policy out enforce-modifications
address-family ipv4 unicast
redistribute connected
allocate-label all
address-family vpnv4 unicast
retain route-target all
neighbor 172.16.8.3
remote-as 1
update-source Loopback0
address-family ipv4 labeled-unicast
route-policy PASS in
route-policy PASS out
router bgp 1 instance IPV6
bgp router-id 99.2.3.4
address-family ipv6 unicast
redistribute connected
thanks,
rivalino

Do you need a cisco router at remote sites when using VRF BGP?

Hello.....
If you could refer to the attached document and read the following... I need to know if a CISCO router is required for each of the sites. OR does the ISP (Provider) provide the only required Router in the private cloud?
We want to replace the Cisco 891 with a PepLink but I don't know if we can do that. Can anyone jump in and help me understand?
When we hear about VRF, its almost synonymous to MPLS VPN. Virtual Routing and Forwarding is commonly used by Service Providers to provide services within an MPLS cloud with multiple customers. The most interesting feature of this is that, VRF allows creation of multiple routing tables within a single router. This means that overlapping use of IP addresses from different customers is possible. Some enterprises use VRF to seggrate their services like VOIP, wireless, geographical location and other varieties.

Whether you can replace the 891 device with another device boils down to a single question: Do you need to run BGP with the Service Provider in order to use their service. If you need to run a routing protocol with your service provider, your service is likely a L3VPN (IP VPN) solution ( i.e. you inject your site's routes into the providers L3VPN session, they use MP-BGP+VRF for segmentation within their network).
If, however, they just drop you a L2 connection and provide L2 emulated services ( e.g. L2VPN or VPLS ) across their network, then your device can be whatever you want it to be.
From your device's perspective, it is not VRF aware. That is, it does not know about how the service provider segments your service from another customers. In the L3VPN case, your device is routing-protocol aware. In the L2VPN case, your device is not routing protocol aware and does not need to form adjacency with the service provider's equipment.
HTH.
Rate if helpful.

Load balance not happening in BGP

Dear Friends,
As per I know local BGP process may implement equal-cost load-balancing to the paths that:
Have the same set of path attributes up to the MED (weight, Local Preference, Origin, MED)
Are of the same type (both learned via iBGP or eBGP)
Have the same IGP cost to reach their NEXT_HOP IP address
If the above conditions are met andmaximum-paths [ibgp]is configured under the BGP process, BGP will install multiple equal-cost routes into the local RIB and use them for load-balancing. We call the above condition as load-balancing conditions for BGP.
As all the above criteria are matched still BGP is not doing load balance. Please find below routing table:
R1:
R1#sh ip bgp
BGP table version is 4, local router ID is 40.1.1.1
Status codes: s suppressed, d damped, h history, * valid, > best, i - internal,
              r RIB-failure, S Stale
Origin codes: i - IGP, e - EGP, ? - incomplete
   Network          Next Hop            Metric LocPrf Weight Path
*>i192.168.1.0      20.1.1.2                 0    100      0 i
* i                        30.1.1.1                 0    100      0 i
R1#sh ip route
Gateway of last resort is not set
     20.0.0.0/24 is subnetted, 1 subnets
R       20.1.1.0 [120/1] via 10.1.1.2, 00:00:03, FastEthernet0/0
     40.0.0.0/24 is subnetted, 1 subnets
C       40.1.1.0 is directly connected, FastEthernet0/1
     10.0.0.0/24 is subnetted, 1 subnets
C       10.1.1.0 is directly connected, FastEthernet0/0
B    192.168.1.0/24 [200/0] via 20.1.1.2, 00:12:01
     30.0.0.0/24 is subnetted, 1 subnets
R       30.1.1.0 [120/1] via 40.1.1.2, 00:00:15, FastEthernet0/1
router bgp 100
no synchronization
bgp log-neighbor-changes
neighbor 10.1.1.2 remote-as 100
neighbor 40.1.1.2 remote-as 100
maximum-paths 2
no auto-summary
Please help....!!!!!!!   why BGP is not load balancing here????
R1#traceroute 192.168.1.1
Type escape sequence to abort.
Tracing the route to 192.168.1.1
1 10.1.1.2 88 msec 60 msec 28 msec
2 20.1.1.2 104 msec 56 msec 120 msec
Regards,
Sanjib

Dear Jon,
Thank you so much.
When I changed the configuration BGP is now loadbalancing. But in configuartion Max-path showing as 1 instead of 2.
R1#sh ip pro | sec bgp
Routing Protocol is "bgp 100"
Outgoing update filter list for all interfaces is not set
Incoming update filter list for all interfaces is not set
IGP synchronization is disabled
Automatic route summarization is disabled
Neighbor(s):
    Address          FiltIn FiltOut DistIn DistOut Weight RouteMap
    12.1.1.2
    13.1.1.3
Maximum path: 1
Routing Information Sources:
    Gateway         Distance      Last Update
    13.1.1.3             200      00:01:12
    12.1.1.2             200      00:02:15
Distance: external 20 internal 200 local 200
Regards,
Sanjib

BGP Path Selection

With reference to cisco's document on BGP Best Path Selection Algorithm (http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/ip/border-gateway-protocol-bgp/13753-25.html).
Out of given 9 paths why 6th has been selected even though AS_PATH for 8th route is better.
Can anyone explains here, as this document has not considered the AS-PATH during path selection and used lowest ROUTER ID only.
Thanks in advance and expect technical explanation here.

Hey Buddy
The AS_PATH for both is only 1, don't get confused by (AS_SET) which only counts as 1 no matter how many AS are in the set. Refer to section "How the Best Path Algorithm Works"
4.Prefer the path with the shortest AS_PATH.
Note: Be aware of these items:
◦An AS_SET counts as 1, no matter how many ASs are in the set.
So bearing the above in mind
Example: BGP Best Path Selection
Path6
(64955 65003) 65089 --- this equals 1
    172.16.254.226 (metric 20645) from 10.57.255.11 (10.57.255.11)
      Origin IGP, metric 0, localpref 100, valid, confed-external, best
      Extended Community: RT:1100:1001
      mpls labels in/out nolabel/362
!--- BGP selects this as the Best Path on comparing
!--- with all the other routes and selected based on lower router ID.
Path8
(65003) 65089 --- this equals 1
    172.16.254.226 (metric 20645) from 172.16.254.234 (172.16.254.234)
      Origin IGP, metric 0, localpref 100, valid, confed-external
      Extended Community: RT:1100:1001
      mpls labels in/out nolabel/362
Comparing path 6 with path 8:
Both paths have reachable next hops
Both paths have a WEIGHT of 0
Both paths have a LOCAL_PREF of 100
Both paths are learned
Both paths have AS_PATH length 1 --- because the (AS_SET) always equals 1
Both paths are of origin IGP
Both paths have the same neighbor AS, 65089, so comparing MED.
Both paths have a MED of 0
Both paths are confed-external
Both paths have an IGP metric to the NEXT_HOP of 20645
Path 6 is better than path 8 because it has a lower Router-ID.
Hope it helps (:

Can you display routes advertised and/or received in OSPF, similar to BGP command sh ip bgp neighbors x.x.x.x advertised-routes?

TOC-BP-SWa#sh ip bgp neighbors 10.14.0.3 advertised-routes
BGP table version is 1674320, local router ID is 10.14.0.1
Status codes: s suppressed, d damped, h history, * valid, > best, i - internal,
S Stale
Origin codes: i - IGP, e - EGP, ? - incomplete
Network Next Hop Metric LocPrf Weight Path
*> 10.14.0.1/32 0.0.0.0 0 32768 i
*> 147.249.37.0/24 172.20.18.1 120 0 2001 65015 65016 64823 7381 64681 i
*> 147.249.38.0/24 172.20.18.1 120 0 2001 65015 65016 64823 7381 64681 i
*> 147.249.46.0/24 172.20.18.1 120 0 2001 65015 65016 64823 7381 12159 12159 i
*> 147.249.196.0/24 172.20.18.1 120 0 2001 65015 65016 64823 64870 65124 i
*> 147.249.237.0/24 172.20.18.1 120 0 2001 65015 65016 64823 7381 64681 i
TOC-BP-SWa#sh ip bgp neighbors 10.14.0.3 received-r
Total number of prefixes 0
TOC-BP-SWa#sh ip bgp neighbors 10.14.0.2 received-r
BGP table version is 1674320, local router ID is 10.14.0.1
Status codes: s suppressed, d damped, h history, * valid, > best, i - internal,
S Stale
Origin codes: i - IGP, e - EGP, ? - incomplete
Network Next Hop Metric LocPrf Weight Path
*>i10.14.0.2/32 10.14.0.2 0 100 0 i
* i147.249.37.0/24 10.14.0.2 0 120 0 2001 65015 65016 64823 7381 64681 i
* i147.249.38.0/24 10.14.0.2 0 120 0 2001 65015 65016 64823 7381 64681 i
* i147.249.46.0/24 10.14.0.2 0 120 0 2001 65015 65016 64823 7381 12159 12159 i
* i147.249.196.0/24 10.14.0.2 0 120 0 2001 65015 65016 64823 64870 65124 i
* i147.249.237.0/24 10.14.0.2 0 120 0 2001 65015 65016 64823 7381 64681 i
Can this output be duplicated with an OSPF command?

Not really because OSPF does not advertise routes it sends LSAs to it's peers.
So you need to look at the OSPF database ie. -
"sh ip ospf database"
which will show you all the LSAs the router is aware of.
In terms of all the LSAs the router has received it will show all of those but it will also show you LSAs that were generated by the router itself although the advertising router IP will point to that being the case.
In terms of all the LSAs the router advertises again it depends on the area and how that has been configured.
So for example an ABR might well have external LSAs (which aren't tied to any area in the OSPF database) but that doesn't necessarily mean it is advertising them to peers within an area as it could have been configured not to.
So it gives you a good idea but you need to also work out a few things for yourself as well.
Jon

Difference between sh ip bgp & sh ip route? BGP tables and main routing table.

Difference between sh ip bgp & sh ip route?
sh ip bgp :::: loc-rib ?
sh ip bgp nei x.x.x.x advertised-routes : adj-rib-in.
sh ip bgp nei x.x.x.x recieved-routes : adj-rib-out.
sh ip bgp nei x.x.x.x routes : loc-rib ?
sh ip route = rib ? if yes does it mean its loc-rib ?
so in a given router with bgp running, will there be 5 tables (sh ip bgp; adj-rib-in; loc-rib;adj-rib-out; sh ip route) ? if yes where are they saved ?

sh ip bgp
shows the BGP table (where are stored info coming from BGP update)
sh ip bgp nei x.x.x.x advertised-routes
shows networks that your router will advertise to a specific neighbor
sh ip bgp nei x.x.x.x recieved-routes
shows advertisement received from a specific neighbor; networks (NLRI) filtered with route-map distribute-list,... are included (Inbound soft reconfiguration must be enabled)
sh ip bgp nei x.x.x.x routes
shows only routes sent by a specific neighbor and not filtered or discarded (i.s accepted)
sh ip route
show routing table; it contains the best route for each network (best is first of all the lowest administrative distance, then the lowest metric)
Bye,
enrico.
PS please rate if useful

Question about network statement in OSPF and BGP

The network statements in OSPF and BGP can be used to advertise networks. But I'm not clear under what circumstances would make more sense to use network statements to advertise a network than by using other methods to have the network learned by other routers.
Here is an example: assume I'm running BGP on router A. I want to advertise network 10.1.1.0/24 to other BGP peers. I have a OSPF route for this network. I can do 2 things: one is to use "network 10.1.1.0 mask 255.255.255.0", the other is to do "redistribute OSPF ... route-map OSPF-INTO-BGP", and create a prefix list to permit 10.1.1.0/24.
Both would work to have this network learned by other BGP peers. But which is better for what purpose?
Thanks a lot
Gary

Hi Gary,
There is one little difference between the use of the two approaches - the route injected into BGP by using a network statement will carry an Origin attribute of IGP, whereas the route injected using redistribution will have an Origin attribute of Incomplete. Now, that is not a huge issue since you can always change that whatever value you desire both with the use of the network statement and redistribution. The important thing, however, is that in the BGP best path selection process, the Origin attribute comparison is fairly high up and will prefer a route with the attribute of IGP.
Apart from that, there is absolutely no difference between using the network statement and using redistribution with a route-map that matches exactly on the same route that you would have specified with the network statement.
I guess one advantage of using the redistribute approach is that it does not clutter up the BGP config. If you wish to add more routes, you simply add them to the prefix list so that you don't really touch the BGP config portion at all..
Hope that helps - pls do remember to rate posts that help.
Paresh

How to prevent BGP code 6 (Cease) subcode 6 (Other Configuration Change)

Can anyone tell How to prevent BGP code 6 (Cease) subcode 6 (Other Configuration Change) ?
We are facing frequent problem with this error. Please suggest how to stop this....
Note :- We are using BGP VPN between this peers.
Logs :
Date/Time : 2015-04-30 00:49:40+05:30
State : Up
Date/Time : 2015-04-30 00:39:05+05:30
State : Down
Error Code : 6(CEASE)
Error Subcode : 6(Other Configuration Change)
Notification : Send Notification
Date/Time : 2015-04-29 18:22:11+05:30
State : Up
Date/Time : 2015-04-29 18:21:39+05:30
State : Down
Error Code : 6(CEASE)
Error Subcode : 6(Other Configuration Change)
Notification : Send Notification

on the same dates you mean the same request are posted in IT2001? ie both full days?
Please clarify
usually the Time collision checks are followed only via posting using report rptarqpost and not while applying through portal in ESS
This is very strange you indicate
SO you need to check the basic tables first
You may need to check the collision.
Collisions Tables V_T554Y and V_554Y_B reaction indicators.
and V_T508A
able T582A set to time constraint of "Z
In backend Pa30 collision works like this
1) the logical collision, checks if there is an overlap in the validity
interval of the IT´s (begda, endda).
2) the physical collision, checks if there is an overlap in the time
interval of the IT's.
In the logical collision it is checked if there is an overlap in the
validity interval if at least one of the records is a full-day
( that is the case when you enter a Daily Work Schedule (DWS) )
So when one of the records has a DWS it is considered to be a full day
record and the logical collision is taken into consideration.
If instead you enter the only the time interval manually the records
are considered to be partial-day and the physical collision is
performed. In that case only the time interval is important.
So if the clock times are not entered the physical collision can not
take place.
The collision functionality is always based on clock times and dates,
never on the total nr of hours.
Edited by: Siddharth Rajora on Sep 21, 2011 4:57 PM

How many BGP peers does the 3548 switch support?

Is it possible to run more than 40 peers on a single switch? What is the limitation if not?

Hi ,
You can have 40 BGP peers , IPV4 unicast routes handled by hardware is only 24000 .Enusre all your BGP peering routing updates is within this limits .
http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/products/collateral/switches/nexus-3548-switch/data_sheet_c78-707001.html
Table 7. Hardware Specifications Common to Both Switches
Mode
Normal Mode
Warp Mode
Hardware tables and scalability
Number of MAC addresses
64,000
8000
Number of IPv4 unicast routes
24,000
4000
Number of IPv4 hosts
64,000
8000
Number of IPv4 multicast routes
8000
8000
Number of VLANS
4096
Number of ACL entries
4096
Number of spanning-tree instances
Rapid Spanning Tree Protocol (RSTP): 512
Multiple Spanning Tree (MST) Protocol: 64
Number of EtherChannels
24
Number of ports per EtherChannel
24
Buffer size
6 MB shared among 16 ports; 18 MB total
Boot flash memory
2 GB
HTH
Sandy

EEM / IP SLA to shutdown lossy high RTT BGP neighbor

Hi,
I'm relatively new to the IP SLA procedure and very new to EEM. I'm searching for the most efficient way to monitor the availability (packet loss and latency) of a BGP neighbor from a router to actively shutdown the neighbor relationship in order to failover to a back up L2L VPN I have configured on an ASA. It's important that I'm able to continue monitoring the BGP neighbor so that when the neighbor becomes stable again, I can reenable the BGP neighbor relationship. I've put something quick together (below) but am not sure if it will do what I want. I'd appreciate any suggestions and feedback.
Thank you!
-Mike
ip sla 90
icmp-echo <neighbor_ip> source-ip <source_ip>
threshold 250
timeout 500
frequency 3
ip sla schedule 90 life forever start-time now
ip sla enable reaction-alerts
track 90 ip sla 90 reachability
delay down 3 up 180
event manager applet BGP_NEIGHBOR_DIRTY
description SHUT DOWN BGP NEIGHBOR IF RTT OVER 250 FOR 3 SECONDS
event syslog pattern "90 ip sla 90 reachability Up->Down"
action 1.0 cli command "enable"
action 1.1 cli command "configure term"
action 1.2 cli command "router bgp 63320"
action 1.3 cli command "neighbor <neighbor_ip> shutdown"
action 1.4 cli command "end"
event manager applet BGP_NEIGHBOR_CLEAN
description ENABLE BGP NEIGHBOR IF RTT UNDER 250 FOR 3 MINUTES
event syslog pattern "90 ip sla 90 reachability Down->Up"
action 1.0 cli command "enable"
action 1.1 cli command "configure term"
action 1.2 cli command "router bgp 63320"
action 1.3 cli command "no neighbor <neighbor_ip> shutdown"
action 1.4 cli command "end"

By chosing a target that is along your desired path, you can certainly have a more robust script. I would use loopback to loopback communication as well, this will force the traffic through the router, and also find any potential issues where the peer is alive and sending bgp but not actually passing traffic. You will definitely need some "fudge" factors in there to deal with routers have to process the ICMP packets (Any CoPP will really really skew the results you are getting). I have had experiences where testing to/from a Nexus device gives wildly different results vs testing through the boxes.
HTH

NX-OS vrf bgp local-as interaction with L3vpn

I use standard MPLS BGP-L3vpn to forward traffic between VRFs on Nexus 7k routers. All of my VRFs are within the same BGP process, so have the same local-as.
I'd like to bring-up an eBGP session from one VRF to a carrier, but the carriers requires that they peer with a specific BGP ASN (call it "65432"). It doesn't look like NX-OS supports the "router bgp 1234, vrf VRF1 neighbor w.x.y.z local-as 65432" command. However, it does appear to support "router bgp 1234, vrf VRF1, local-as 65432".
My limited understanding is that this would prepend "65432" onto all routes advertised to all VRF1 neighbors? And that all neighbors defined under VRF1 on this router would learn routes from me with as-path "^65432 1234 ..."?
If so, would this have any affect on routes exchanged with other VRFs using import/export rd?

It's tricky given that BGP's AD is always going to beat out EIGRP's all other things being equal. Most of the things you can do with BGP route-maps involve making one BGP route preferred over another.
You could inject the preferred path as a static route (AD = 1) to the firewall using an ip sla operation and having the static route track that. Once the ip sla operation fails, the static route is withdrawn and then the BGP-learned route (AD = 20) will take precedence.

Nexus 7010 bgp state change alert not triggered to NNM

Hi ,
BGP state change alert not triggered to NNM on Nexus -7010 for Monitoring.
Details of the Device:
Nexus 7010 :
Software
BIOS:      version 3.22.0
kickstart: version 5.1(3)
system:    version 5.1(3)
BGP neighbor status :
Neighbor        V    AS MsgRcvd MsgSent   TblVer InQ OutQ Up/Down State/PfxRcd
172.16.1.2      4 65505 5089234 5194515    51359    0    0     6w2d 391
172.16.1.3      4 65505 5044293 5146859    51359    0    0    30w4d 378
172.31.11.3     4 15404 120744 114811    51359    0    0     1w6d 1
172.31.42.3     4 65501 5261796 5264413    51359    0    0    2d06h 0
Snmp trap enabled:
snmp-server user admin network-admin auth md5 0x690c4ede8a88ba7f2de791dbe7a77f0a
priv 0x690c4ede8a88ba7f2de791dbe7a77f0a localizedkey
snmp-server host 172.30.0.55 traps version 2c xxxx
snmp-server enable traps bgp
Downloaded cisco-bgp4-mib version, bgp4-mib tried and performed snmpwalk as given below
nnmsnmpwalk.ovpl -c xxx 172.31.15.130 .1.3.6.1.4.1.9.9.187.0.6
Error : No MIB objects contained under subtree
nnmsnmpwalk.ovpl -v 2 -c xxx 172.31.15.130 .1.3.6.1.2.1.15.3.
No MIB objects contained under subtree
Kindly advise to resolve the issue
Regards
Hari

You can set an alert for Warning State. This is feasible.
Juke Chou
TechNet Community Support

NBAR & BGP

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for