Need JDBC 2-phase commit support

The Oracle JDBC drivers don't support 2-phase commit. We need
this for our product. Does anyone have any suggestions of third
party products we might want to look at?
TIA,
Sandra
null

As this forum is for discussions around the 9iAS Portal product, please post your question to our NEW Oracle9i Application Server forum. Your 9i Application Server question will be answered there.
null

Similar Messages

JDBC driver does not support XA, hence cannot be a participant in two-phase

Hi
I have a question, we enabled "One Phase Commit", even though we are getting "javax.transaction.xa.XAException: JDBC driver does not support XA, hence cannot be a participant in two-phase commit. To force this participation, set the GlobalTransactionsProtocol attribute to LoggingLastResource (recommended) or EmulateTwoPhaseCommit for the Data Source =nested exception is: javax.transaction.xa.XAException: JDBC driver does not support XA, hence cannot be a participant in two-phase commit. To force this participation, set the GlobalTransactionsProtocol attribute to LoggingLastResource (recommended) or EmulateTwoPhaseCommit for the Data Source". Why is that?
Thanks
Edited by: user7256072 on Apr 10, 2012 12:35 PM

Is there more than one resource participating in the transaction?
If this is the case, and the resources are for example a database and JMS, you can emulate XA
by using the logging last resource setting on a non-XA driver.
An example of the above is presented here: http://middlewaremagic.com/weblogic/?p=7716 (the section my first JavaEE6 application)
Here a stateless EJB is used that has an insertPerson method that uses a datasource and JMS in a transaction.

Tuxedo 12c - Do mainframe adapters support two-phase commit?

With Oracle Tuxedo 12c, do the Tuxedo mainframe adapters support two-phase commit? I see there is support for two-phase commit with Tuxedo COBRA, for relational databases. My customer has a requirement to integrate with their mainframe systems and require two-phase commit (for rollback functionality) with the Tuxedo mainframe adapters.

Hi,
The Tuxedo Mainframe Adapter for SNA supports two phase commit protocol, or in IBM mainframe parlance syncpoint level 2.
Regards,
Todd Little
Oracle Tuxedo Chief Architect

Two phase commit and bean managed transactions

To all the Transaction GURUS!
          Hi guys (-and gals).
          I've been doing J2EE for quite a while, but today was my first at
          XA-Transactions and Bean Managed Transactions.
          Why am I doing this?
          ====================
          Well I have to be able to controll the transactionalbehaviour of my
          bean
          during runtime, since some bean calls would cause a transactional
          overflow due to the stress they would cause to the system, whereas
          smaller bean calls need to run in one transaction.
          -> Therefore I need Bean Managed Transactions
          Since the bean does a call on two Database Connections it has to use a
          XA-Transaction.
          -> Therefore I need XA-Transactions.
          Abstract
          ========
          - I just can't get a User TransAction into the right Status it stays
          in 'STATUS_NO_TRANSACTION' all the time
          - Therefore the SQL Commands can be comitted 'java.sql.SQLException:
          Does not support SQL execution with no global transaction'
          - Therefore I can't do a rollback 'java.lang.IllegalStateException:
          Transaction does not exist'
          - Therefore I wrote this mail.
          I don't want to be a smart-"ass" writing such a detailed and indepth
          mail. I just would like to show that I tried, and would like to have
          some replies from you guys.
          Below are my configurations, code and logfiles.
          Thanx for taking your time and hope that the other people may learn
          something as well.
          cu
          Stefan
          Scenario
          ========
          used Software
          Bea Weblogic (WL) 6.0 SPx (not real sure which SP i have)
          Oracle 8.1.6 using the API-Version 8
          I configured the system as follows:
          (ofcourse I 'xxx'ed out all of the confidential data, sorry guys;-))
          excerpt from:
          config.xml
          <JDBCConnectionPool CapacityIncrement="5"
          DriverName="oracle.jdbc.driver.OracleDriver" InitialCapacity="2"
          LoginDelaySeconds="1" MaxCapacity="5" Name="oraclePool"
          Properties="user=xxx;password=xxx;dll=ocijdbc8;protocol=thin"
          RefreshMinutes="5" Targets="fbsserver" TestConnectionsOnRelease="true"
          TestTableName="languages" URL="jdbc:oracle:thin:@xxx:1521:xxx "/>
          
          <JDBCTxDataSource EnableTwoPhaseCommit="true"
          JNDIName="finstral.datasource.fbs" Name="finstral Content Datasource"
          PoolName="oraclePool" Targets="fbsserver"/>
          
          <JDBCConnectionPool CapacityIncrement="5"
          DriverName="weblogic.jdbc.oci.xa.XADataSource" InitialCapacity="1"
          LoginDelaySeconds="1" MaxCapacity="2" Name="oracleSecurityPool"
          Properties="user=xxx;password=xxx;server=xxx.xxx.xxx"
          RefreshMinutes="5" Targets="fbsserver" TestConnectionsOnRelease="true"
          TestTableName="Users" SupportsLocalTransaction="true"/>
          
          <JDBCTxDataSource EnableTwoPhaseCommit="true"
          JNDIName="finstral.datasource.fbssecurity" Name="finstral Security
          Datasource" PoolName="oracleSecurityPool" Targets="fbsserver"/>
          
          ejb-jar.xml
          <ejb-jar>
               <enterprise-beans>
                    <session>
                         <ejb-name>TPCTestBean</ejb-name>
          <home>de.sitewaerts.futuna.common.test.tpcbean.TPCHome</home>
          <remote>de.sitewaerts.futuna.common.test.tpcbean.TPC</remote>
          <ejb-class>de.sitewaerts.futuna.common.test.tpcbean.TPCBean</ejb-class>
                         <session-type>Stateless</session-type>
                         <transaction-type>Bean</transaction-type>
                    </session>
               </enterprise-beans>
               <assembly-descriptor/>
          </ejb-jar>
          
          weblogic-ejb-jar.xml
          <weblogic-ejb-jar>
               <weblogic-enterprise-bean>
                    <ejb-name>TPCTestBean</ejb-name>
                    <stateless-session-descriptor/>
                    <jndi-name>finstral/ejb/test_tpc</jndi-name>
               </weblogic-enterprise-bean>
          </weblogic-ejb-jar>
          
          BeanCode (from the implementingBeanClass:
          'de.sitewaerts.futuna.common.test.tpcbean.TPCBean')
          public void setupTables() throws RemoteException
          UserTransaction tx = getTransaction();
          //getTransaction calls: 'tx = sCtx.getUserTransaction()' and does
          some errorhandling
          log.info("Die Transaktion vor den Connections: "+tx.toString());
          //Sorry bout the German. You should get the Message though.
          log.info("Der Transaktionsstatus vor den Connections:
          "+transactionStatus(tx));
          Connection conSecurity = getConnection(DATASOURCE_SECURITY, tx);
          //gets a Connection via a DataSourceName from the JNDI tree
          Connection conContent = getConnection(DATASOURCE_CONTENT, tx);
          log.info("Die frische Connection conSecurity: "+conSecurity);
          log.info("Die frische Connection conContent: "+conContent);
          tearDownTable(conSecurity);
          //Does nothing special
          tearDownTable(conContent);
          log.info("Die Transaktion nach dem Teardown: "+tx.toString());
          log.info("Der Transaktionsstatus nach dem Teardown:
          "+transactionStatus(tx));
          Statement stmt = null;
          try
          stmt = conSecurity.createStatement();
          //Well its getting interesting now.....
          log.info("Die Transaktion vor dem createtable: "+tx.toString());
          log.info("Der Transaktionsstatus vor dem createtable:
          "+transactionStatus(tx));
          log.info("Die Connection conSecurity vor dem createtable:
          "+conSecurity);
          log.info("Die Connection conContent vor dem createtable:
          "+conContent);
          stmt.executeUpdate(CREATE_TABLE);
          //above is the row 91 -> throws: 'java.sql.SQLException: Does
          not support SQL execution with no global transaction'
          stmt.close();
          stmt = conContent.createStatement();
          stmt.executeUpdate(CREATE_TABLE);
          stmt.close();
          commitTransaction(tx);
          catch (SQLException sqle)
          log.error("Konnte kein table init machen", sqle);
          rollbackTransaction(tx);
          //The Code for this method is below
          throw new EJBException(sqle);
          finally
          closeConnection(conSecurity);
          closeConnection(conContent);
          protected void rollbackTransaction(UserTransaction tx)
          log.info("Der Transaktionsstatus vor dem Rollback:
          "+transactionStatus(tx));
          log.info("Die Transaktion vor dem Rollback: "+tx.toString());
          try
          tx.rollback();
          //above is row 200 -> throws: 'java.lang.IllegalStateException:
          Transaction does not exist'
          log.info("Der Transaktionsstatus nach dem Rollback:
          "+transactionStatus(tx));
          log.info("Die Transaktion nach dem Rollback: "+tx.toString());
          catch (Exception e)
          log.error("Konnte die Transaktion nicht backrollen.", e);
          throw new EJBException(e);
          Log Excerpt
          ===========
          INFO setupTables() (66) - Die Transaktion vor den Connections:
          [email protected]
          INFO setupTables() (67) - Der Transaktionsstatus vor den Connections:
          STATUS_NO_TRANSACTION
          INFO setupTables() (72) - Die frische Connection conSecurity:
          weblogic.jdbc.rmi.SerialConnection@7c6daa
          INFO setupTables() (73) - Die frische Connection conContent:
          weblogic.jdbc.rmi.SerialConnection@3b425
          INFO setupTables() (78) - Die Transaktion nach dem Teardown:
          [email protected]
          INFO setupTables() (79) - Der Transaktionsstatus nach dem Teardown:
          STATUS_NO_TRANSACTION
          INFO setupTables() (86) - Die Transaktion vor dem createtable:
          [email protected]
          INFO setupTables() (87) - Der Transaktionsstatus vor dem createtable:
          STATUS_NO_TRANSACTION
          INFO setupTables() (88) - Die Connection conSecurity vor dem
          createtable: weblogic.jdbc.rmi.SerialConnection@7c6daa
          INFO setupTables() (89) - Die Connection conContent vor dem
          createtable: weblogic.jdbc.rmi.SerialConnection@3b425
          ERROR setupTables() (101) - Konnte kein table init machen
          java.sql.SQLException: Does not support SQL execution with no global
          transaction
               at
          weblogic.jdbc.oci.xa.XAConnection.beforeExecute(XAConnection.java:137)
               at
          weblogic.jdbc.oci.xa.Statement.executeUpdate(Statement.java:112)
               at weblogic.jdbc.jta.Statement.executeUpdate(Statement.java:185)
               at
          weblogic.jdbc.rmi.internal.StatementImpl.executeUpdate(StatementImpl.jav
          a:42)
               at
          weblogic.jdbc.rmi.SerialStatement.executeUpdate(SerialStatement.java:54)
               at
          de.sitewaerts.futuna.common.test.tpcbean.TPCBean.setupTables(TPCBean.jav
          a:91)
               at
          de.sitewaerts.futuna.common.test.tpcbean.TPCBeanImpl.setupTables(TPCBean
          Impl.java:130)
               at
          de.sitewaerts.futuna.common.test.tpcbean.TPCBeanEOImpl.setupTables(TPCBe
          anEOImpl.java:64)
               at
          de.sitewaerts.futuna.common.test.TwoPhaseCommitUnitTest.setUp(TwoPhaseCo
          mmitUnitTest.java:51)
               at
          org.apache.commons.cactus.AbstractTestCase.runBareServerTest(AbstractTes
          tCase.java:297)
               at
          org.apache.commons.cactus.server.ServletTestCaller.callTestMethod(Servle
          tTestCaller.java:148)
               at
          org.apache.commons.cactus.server.ServletTestCaller.doTest(ServletTestCal
          ler.java:199)
               at
          org.apache.commons.cactus.server.ServletTestRedirector.doPost(ServletTes
          tRedirector.java:149)
               at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:760)
               at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:853)
               at
          weblogic.servlet.internal.ServletStubImpl.invokeServlet(ServletStubImpl.
          java:213)
               at
          weblogic.servlet.internal.WebAppServletContext.invokeServlet(WebAppServl
          etContext.java:1265)
               at
          weblogic.servlet.internal.ServletRequestImpl.execute(ServletRequestImpl.
          java:1631)
               at weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread.execute(ExecuteThread.java:137)
               at weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread.run(ExecuteThread.java:120)
          INFO rollbackTransaction() (196) - Der Transaktionsstatus vor dem
          Rollback: STATUS_NO_TRANSACTION
          INFO rollbackTransaction() (197) - Die Transaktion vor dem Rollback:
          [email protected]
          ERROR rollbackTransaction() (206) - Konnte die Transaktion nicht
          backrollen.
          java.lang.IllegalStateException: Transaction does not exist
               at
          weblogic.transaction.internal.TransactionManagerImpl.rollback(Transactio
          nManagerImpl.java:228)
               at
          weblogic.transaction.internal.TransactionManagerImpl.rollback(Transactio
          nManagerImpl.java:222)
               at
          de.sitewaerts.futuna.common.test.tpcbean.TPCBean.rollbackTransaction(TPC
          Bean.java:200)
               at
          de.sitewaerts.futuna.common.test.tpcbean.TPCBean.setupTables(TPCBean.jav
          a:102)
               at
          de.sitewaerts.futuna.common.test.tpcbean.TPCBeanImpl.setupTables(TPCBean
          Impl.java:130)
               at
          de.sitewaerts.futuna.common.test.tpcbean.TPCBeanEOImpl.setupTables(TPCBe
          anEOImpl.java:64)
               at
          de.sitewaerts.futuna.common.test.TwoPhaseCommitUnitTest.setUp(TwoPhaseCo
          mmitUnitTest.java:51)
               at
          org.apache.commons.cactus.AbstractTestCase.runBareServerTest(AbstractTes
          tCase.java:297)
               at
          org.apache.commons.cactus.server.ServletTestCaller.callTestMethod(Servle
          tTestCaller.java:148)
               at
          org.apache.commons.cactus.server.ServletTestCaller.doTest(ServletTestCal
          ler.java:199)
               at
          org.apache.commons.cactus.server.ServletTestRedirector.doPost(ServletTes
          tRedirector.java:149)
               at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:760)
               at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:853)
               at
          weblogic.servlet.internal.ServletStubImpl.invokeServlet(ServletStubImpl.
          java:213)
               at
          weblogic.servlet.internal.WebAppServletContext.invokeServlet(WebAppServl
          etContext.java:1265)
               at
          weblogic.servlet.internal.ServletRequestImpl.execute(ServletRequestImpl.
          java:1631)
               at weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread.execute(ExecuteThread.java:137)
               at weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread.run(ExecuteThread.java:120)
          CONCLUSION
          ==========
          I'm going nuts.
          I just don't get it.
          The transaction is the same. I don't change the Connection. I start
          the Transaction at the beginning before I do anything!
          Please guys help me out.
          Thx alot.
          Stefan "it's three o'clock in the morning, my girlfriend left me, and
          my only friend is that stupid linux pinguine" Siprell
          Software-Development
          <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
          <sitewaerts> GmbH
          Hebelstraße 15
          D-76131 Karlsruhe
          Tel: +49 (721) 920 918 22
          Fax: +49 (721) 920 918 29
          http://www.sitewaerts.de
          >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>


Hi Priscilla
          (did you ever see the movie ? :-))
          Well I moved away from the idea of using bean managed transaction. I'll
          be using Container Managed Transactions. To modify the
          transactionalbehaviour I'll write proxymethods which have certain
          different containermanaged transaction properties, but which all call
          the same private methods.
          But it works! Here is my experience:
          - I was doing a DDL statement: I was trying to create new Tables, which
          is a definite "no-go"
          - pay careful attention to:
          http://edocs.bea.com/wls/docs60/jta/trxejb.html#1051405
                    and
          http://edocs.bea.com/wls/docs60/jta/trxejb.html#1051741
          and use these Settings for the Pool, don't ask me why, but it took me
          hours to find it out by myself:
               <JDBCConnectionPool CapacityIncrement="5"
          DriverName="weblogic.jdbc.oci.xa.XADataSource" InitialCapacity="1"
          LoginDelaySeconds="1" MaxCapacity="2" Name="oracleSecurityPool"
          Properties="user=xxx; password=xxx; server=xxx.xxx.xxx"
          RefreshMinutes="5" Targets="fbsserver" TestConnectionsOnRelease="true"
          TestTableName="Users" SupportsLocalTransaction="true"/>
          where as the server (shown as: xxx.xxx.xxx) is the TNS Name of the
          Oracle Driver.
          It works great.
          Another thing you guys might want to do is write a simple StatelessSB
          which does JDBC calls and two different database Connections.
          Then write a UnitTest which calls this bean a couple hundred times (with
          the same transaction). Have one test do clean writes, and another which
          causes some SQL-Exception (too long Data Columns, or likewise).
          Always count the entries and see if everything worked out. We're using
          this SetupConstruction to test new combinations of AS(sorry Priscilla) /
          Database / Db-Drivers to have a "standard test".
          I know my two cents were uncalled for, but it might save you some
          time.....
          thanx for your help
          Stefan
          -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
          Von: Priscilla Fung [mailto:[email protected]]
          Bereitgestellt: Donnerstag, 2. August 2001 21:42
          Bereitgestellt in: transaction
          Unterhaltung: Two phase commit and bean managed transactions
          Betreff: Re: Two phase commit and bean managed transactions
          Hi Stefan,
          Looks like you have not actually begun a transaction by calling
          UserTransaction.begin(),
          so your setupTables method is really executing with no transaction
          context.
          Priscilla
          Stefan Siprell <[email protected]> wrote:
          >To all the Transaction GURUS!
          >
          >Hi guys (-and gals).
          >I've been doing J2EE for quite a while, but today was my first at
          >XA-Transactions and Bean Managed Transactions.
          >
          >Why am I doing this?
          >====================
          >Well I have to be able to controll the transactionalbehaviour of my
          >bean
          >during runtime, since some bean calls would cause a transactional
          >overflow due to the stress they would cause to the system, whereas
          >smaller bean calls need to run in one transaction.
          >-> Therefore I need Bean Managed Transactions
          >Since the bean does a call on two Database Connections it has to use
          >a
          >XA-Transaction.
          >-> Therefore I need XA-Transactions.
          >
          >Abstract
          >========
          >- I just can't get a User TransAction into the right Status it stays
          >in 'STATUS_NO_TRANSACTION' all the time
          >- Therefore the SQL Commands can be comitted 'java.sql.SQLException:
          >Does not support SQL execution with no global transaction'
          >- Therefore I can't do a rollback 'java.lang.IllegalStateException:
          >Transaction does not exist'
          >- Therefore I wrote this mail.
          >
          >I don't want to be a smart-"ass" writing such a detailed and indepth
          >mail. I just would like to show that I tried, and would like to have
          >some replies from you guys.
          >
          >Below are my configurations, code and logfiles.
          >
          >Thanx for taking your time and hope that the other people may learn
          >something as well.
          >
          >cu
          >
          >Stefan
          >
          >
          >Scenario
          >========
          >
          >used Software
          >-------------
          >Bea Weblogic (WL) 6.0 SPx (not real sure which SP i have)
          >Oracle 8.1.6 using the API-Version 8
          >
          >
          >I configured the system as follows:
          >(ofcourse I 'xxx'ed out all of the confidential data, sorry guys;-))
          >excerpt from:
          >
          >config.xml
          >----------
          ><JDBCConnectionPool CapacityIncrement="5"
          >DriverName="oracle.jdbc.driver.OracleDriver" InitialCapacity="2"
          >LoginDelaySeconds="1" MaxCapacity="5" Name="oraclePool"
          >Properties="user=xxx;password=xxx;dll=ocijdbc8;protocol=thin"
          >RefreshMinutes="5" Targets="fbsserver" TestConnectionsOnRelease="true"
          >TestTableName="languages" URL="jdbc:oracle:thin:@xxx:1521:xxx "/>
          >
          >
          >
          ><JDBCTxDataSource EnableTwoPhaseCommit="true"
          >JNDIName="finstral.datasource.fbs" Name="finstral Content Datasource"
          >PoolName="oraclePool" Targets="fbsserver"/>
          >
          >
          >
          ><JDBCConnectionPool CapacityIncrement="5"
          >DriverName="weblogic.jdbc.oci.xa.XADataSource" InitialCapacity="1"
          >LoginDelaySeconds="1" MaxCapacity="2" Name="oracleSecurityPool"
          >Properties="user=xxx;password=xxx;server=xxx.xxx.xxx"
          >RefreshMinutes="5" Targets="fbsserver" TestConnectionsOnRelease="true"
          >TestTableName="Users" SupportsLocalTransaction="true"/>
          >
          >
          >
          ><JDBCTxDataSource EnableTwoPhaseCommit="true"
          >JNDIName="finstral.datasource.fbssecurity" Name="finstral Security
          >Datasource" PoolName="oracleSecurityPool" Targets="fbsserver"/>
          >
          >
          >
          >
          >
          >ejb-jar.xml
          >-----------
          ><ejb-jar>
          >     <enterprise-beans>
          >          <session>
          >               <ejb-name>TPCTestBean</ejb-name>
          >
          ><home>de.sitewaerts.futuna.common.test.tpcbean.TPCHome</home>
          >
          ><remote>de.sitewaerts.futuna.common.test.tpcbean.TPC</remote>
          >
          ><ejb-class>de.sitewaerts.futuna.common.test.tpcbean.TPCBean</ejb-class>
          >               <session-type>Stateless</session-type>
          >               <transaction-type>Bean</transaction-type>
          >          </session>
          >     </enterprise-beans>
          >     <assembly-descriptor/>
          ></ejb-jar>
          >
          >
          >
          >weblogic-ejb-jar.xml
          >--------------------
          ><weblogic-ejb-jar>
          >     <weblogic-enterprise-bean>
          >          <ejb-name>TPCTestBean</ejb-name>
          >          <stateless-session-descriptor/>
          >          <jndi-name>finstral/ejb/test_tpc</jndi-name>
          >     </weblogic-enterprise-bean>
          ></weblogic-ejb-jar>
          >
          >
          >
          >BeanCode (from the implementingBeanClass:
          >'de.sitewaerts.futuna.common.test.tpcbean.TPCBean')
          >-----------------------------------------------------------------------
          >---------------------
          >
          > public void setupTables() throws RemoteException
          > {
          > UserTransaction tx = getTransaction();
          > //getTransaction calls: 'tx = sCtx.getUserTransaction()' and does
          >some errorhandling
          >
          > log.info("Die Transaktion vor den Connections: "+tx.toString());
          > //Sorry bout the German. You should get the Message though.
          > log.info("Der Transaktionsstatus vor den Connections:
          >"+transactionStatus(tx));
          >
          > Connection conSecurity = getConnection(DATASOURCE_SECURITY, tx);
          > //gets a Connection via a DataSourceName from the JNDI tree
          > Connection conContent = getConnection(DATASOURCE_CONTENT, tx);
          >
          > log.info("Die frische Connection conSecurity: "+conSecurity);
          > log.info("Die frische Connection conContent: "+conContent);
          >
          > tearDownTable(conSecurity);
          > //Does nothing special
          > tearDownTable(conContent);
          >
          > log.info("Die Transaktion nach dem Teardown: "+tx.toString());
          > log.info("Der Transaktionsstatus nach dem Teardown:
          >"+transactionStatus(tx));
          >
          > Statement stmt = null;
          > try
          > {
          > stmt = conSecurity.createStatement();
          > //Well its getting interesting now.....
          >
          > log.info("Die Transaktion vor dem createtable: "+tx.toString());
          > log.info("Der Transaktionsstatus vor dem createtable:
          >"+transactionStatus(tx));
          > log.info("Die Connection conSecurity vor dem createtable:
          >"+conSecurity);
          > log.info("Die Connection conContent vor dem createtable:
          >"+conContent);
          >
          > stmt.executeUpdate(CREATE_TABLE);
          > //above is the row 91 -> throws: 'java.sql.SQLException: Does
          >not support SQL execution with no global transaction'
          >
          > stmt.close();
          >
          > stmt = conContent.createStatement();
          > stmt.executeUpdate(CREATE_TABLE);
          > stmt.close();
          > commitTransaction(tx);
          > }
          > catch (SQLException sqle)
          > {
          > log.error("Konnte kein table init machen", sqle);
          > rollbackTransaction(tx);
          > //The Code for this method is below
          > throw new EJBException(sqle);
          > }
          > finally
          > {
          > closeConnection(conSecurity);
          > closeConnection(conContent);
          > }
          > }
          >
          > protected void rollbackTransaction(UserTransaction tx)
          > {
          > log.info("Der Transaktionsstatus vor dem Rollback:
          >"+transactionStatus(tx));
          > log.info("Die Transaktion vor dem Rollback: "+tx.toString());
          > try
          > {
          > tx.rollback();
          > //above is row 200 -> throws: 'java.lang.IllegalStateException:
          >Transaction does not exist'
          > log.info("Der Transaktionsstatus nach dem Rollback:
          >"+transactionStatus(tx));
          > log.info("Die Transaktion nach dem Rollback: "+tx.toString());
          > }
          > catch (Exception e)
          > {
          > log.error("Konnte die Transaktion nicht backrollen.", e);
          > throw new EJBException(e);
          > }
          > }
          >
          >Log Excerpt
          >===========
          >INFO setupTables() (66) - Die Transaktion vor den Connections:
          >[email protected]
          >INFO setupTables() (67) - Der Transaktionsstatus vor den Connections:
          >STATUS_NO_TRANSACTION
          >INFO setupTables() (72) - Die frische Connection conSecurity:
          >weblogic.jdbc.rmi.SerialConnection@7c6daa
          >INFO setupTables() (73) - Die frische Connection conContent:
          >weblogic.jdbc.rmi.SerialConnection@3b425
          >INFO setupTables() (78) - Die Transaktion nach dem Teardown:
          >[email protected]
          >INFO setupTables() (79) - Der Transaktionsstatus nach dem Teardown:
          >STATUS_NO_TRANSACTION
          >INFO setupTables() (86) - Die Transaktion vor dem createtable:
          >[email protected]
          >INFO setupTables() (87) - Der Transaktionsstatus vor dem createtable:
          >STATUS_NO_TRANSACTION
          >INFO setupTables() (88) - Die Connection conSecurity vor dem
          >createtable: weblogic.jdbc.rmi.SerialConnection@7c6daa
          >INFO setupTables() (89) - Die Connection conContent vor dem
          >createtable: weblogic.jdbc.rmi.SerialConnection@3b425
          >ERROR setupTables() (101) - Konnte kein table init machen
          >java.sql.SQLException: Does not support SQL execution with no global
          >transaction
          >     at
          >weblogic.jdbc.oci.xa.XAConnection.beforeExecute(XAConnection.java:137)
          >     at
          >weblogic.jdbc.oci.xa.Statement.executeUpdate(Statement.java:112)
          >     at weblogic.jdbc.jta.Statement.executeUpdate(Statement.java:185)
          >     at
          >weblogic.jdbc.rmi.internal.StatementImpl.executeUpdate(StatementImpl.ja
          v
          >a:42)
          >     at
          >weblogic.jdbc.rmi.SerialStatement.executeUpdate(SerialStatement.java:54
          >     at
          >de.sitewaerts.futuna.common.test.tpcbean.TPCBean.setupTables(TPCBean.ja
          v
          >a:91)
          >     at
          >de.sitewaerts.futuna.common.test.tpcbean.TPCBeanImpl.setupTables(TPCBea
          n
          >Impl.java:130)
          >     at
          >de.sitewaerts.futuna.common.test.tpcbean.TPCBeanEOImpl.setupTables(TPCB
          e
          >anEOImpl.java:64)
          >     at
          >de.sitewaerts.futuna.common.test.TwoPhaseCommitUnitTest.setUp(TwoPhaseC
          o
          >mmitUnitTest.java:51)
          >     at
          >org.apache.commons.cactus.AbstractTestCase.runBareServerTest(AbstractTe
          s
          >tCase.java:297)
          >     at
          >org.apache.commons.cactus.server.ServletTestCaller.callTestMethod(Servl
          e
          >tTestCaller.java:148)
          >     at
          >org.apache.commons.cactus.server.ServletTestCaller.doTest(ServletTestCa
          l
          >ler.java:199)
          >     at
          >org.apache.commons.cactus.server.ServletTestRedirector.doPost(ServletTe
          s
          >tRedirector.java:149)
          >     at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:760)
          >     at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:853)
          >     at
          >weblogic.servlet.internal.ServletStubImpl.invokeServlet(ServletStubImpl
          >java:213)
          >     at
          >weblogic.servlet.internal.WebAppServletContext.invokeServlet(WebAppServ
          l
          >etContext.java:1265)
          >     at
          >weblogic.servlet.internal.ServletRequestImpl.execute(ServletRequestImpl
          >java:1631)
          >     at weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread.execute(ExecuteThread.java:137)
          >     at weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread.run(ExecuteThread.java:120)
          >INFO rollbackTransaction() (196) - Der Transaktionsstatus vor dem
          >Rollback: STATUS_NO_TRANSACTION
          >INFO rollbackTransaction() (197) - Die Transaktion vor dem Rollback:
          >[email protected]
          >ERROR rollbackTransaction() (206) - Konnte die Transaktion nicht
          >backrollen.
          >java.lang.IllegalStateException: Transaction does not exist
          >     at
          >weblogic.transaction.internal.TransactionManagerImpl.rollback(Transacti
          o
          >nManagerImpl.java:228)
          >     at
          >weblogic.transaction.internal.TransactionManagerImpl.rollback(Transacti
          o
          >nManagerImpl.java:222)
          >     at
          >de.sitewaerts.futuna.common.test.tpcbean.TPCBean.rollbackTransaction(TP
          C
          >Bean.java:200)
          >     at
          >de.sitewaerts.futuna.common.test.tpcbean.TPCBean.setupTables(TPCBean.ja
          v
          >a:102)
          >     at
          >de.sitewaerts.futuna.common.test.tpcbean.TPCBeanImpl.setupTables(TPCBea
          n
          >Impl.java:130)
          >     at
          >de.sitewaerts.futuna.common.test.tpcbean.TPCBeanEOImpl.setupTables(TPCB
          e
          >anEOImpl.java:64)
          >     at
          >de.sitewaerts.futuna.common.test.TwoPhaseCommitUnitTest.setUp(TwoPhaseC
          o
          >mmitUnitTest.java:51)
          >     at
          >org.apache.commons.cactus.AbstractTestCase.runBareServerTest(AbstractTe
          s
          >tCase.java:297)
          >     at
          >org.apache.commons.cactus.server.ServletTestCaller.callTestMethod(Servl
          e
          >tTestCaller.java:148)
          >     at
          >org.apache.commons.cactus.server.ServletTestCaller.doTest(ServletTestCa
          l
          >ler.java:199)
          >     at
          >org.apache.commons.cactus.server.ServletTestRedirector.doPost(ServletTe
          s
          >tRedirector.java:149)
          >     at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:760)
          >     at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:853)
          >     at
          >weblogic.servlet.internal.ServletStubImpl.invokeServlet(ServletStubImpl
          >java:213)
          >     at
          >weblogic.servlet.internal.WebAppServletContext.invokeServlet(WebAppServ
          l
          >etContext.java:1265)
          >     at
          >weblogic.servlet.internal.ServletRequestImpl.execute(ServletRequestImpl
          >java:1631)
          >     at weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread.execute(ExecuteThread.java:137)
          >     at weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread.run(ExecuteThread.java:120)
          >
          >
          >CONCLUSION
          >==========
          >I'm going nuts.
          >I just don't get it.
          >The transaction is the same. I don't change the Connection. I start
          >the Transaction at the beginning before I do anything!
          >Please guys help me out.
          >Thx alot.
          >
          >Stefan "it's three o'clock in the morning, my girlfriend left me, and
          >my only friend is that stupid linux pinguine" Siprell
          >Software-Development
          ><<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
          ><sitewaerts> GmbH
          >Hebelstraße 15
          >D-76131 Karlsruhe
          >
          >Tel: +49 (721) 920 918 22
          >Fax: +49 (721) 920 918 29
          >http://www.sitewaerts.de
          >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
          >
          >
          >

ADF Service Interface: two-phase commit issue for multiple data sources

In FusionApps, For a service interface we had to use two DataSource resources (in the ejb-jar.xml),
one is ApplicationServiceDBDS for SI and the other one is ApplicationDBDS(I don’t know the exact reason why this is needed, but when running the webservice, Framework was throwing an error asking for this) After adding these two, now(while running the webservice) we’re caught up with an error saying that unable to participate in two phase commit. I think this is because we added two dataSources, if we just use one dataSource everything is working fine.
Error message from app server:
"JDBC driver does not support XA, hence cannot be a participant in two-phase commit. To force this participation, set the GlobalTransactionsProtocol attribute to LoggingLastResource (recommended) or EmulateTwoPhaseCommit for the Data Source=ApplicationDB"
we have made the changes to ApplicationDB as said in the error message, but then the server is failing to start because of this.

Hi,
this is what the doc says - though not about two phase commit but transaction sharing:
"At runtime, the calling client and the ADF service may or may not participate in the same transaction, depending on the protocol used to invoke the service (either SOAP or RMI). Only the RMI protocol and a Java Transaction API (JTA) managed transaction support the option to call the service in the same transaction as the calling client."
When your application accesses a remote ADF Business Components service, each remote call is stateless, and the remote service will not participate in the same transaction as the business component that uses a service-enabled application module's service interface.
In the majority of the cases, calls to remote services will be informational in nature and will not make changes to remote objects. However, if you must use a remote service to make changes, then keep these points in mind:
An exception thrown by the remote service will cause the local transaction to fail.
If you successfully call a remote service that results in modifying data, and then subsequently your local transaction fails for any reason, then it is the responsibility of your error handling code to perform a compensating transaction against the remote service to "undo" the previous change made."
http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E23943_01/web.1111/b31974/bcextservices.htm
Frank

JDBC driver does not support XA - Exception

JDBC driver does not support XA
cannot participate in a two-phase commit
To Force participation set EnableTwoPhaseCommit property on the corresponding JDBCTxDataSource property to true
1) What is a JDBCTxDataSource - what does the TX mean?
2) I have two data sources and according to BEA Weblogic docs, setting the property on both won't solve the problem. I tried.
3) When I try to change the data pools to use XA drivers, I get the following error on server startup:
java.sql.SQLException: Pool connect failed: java.lang.Exception: WebLogic Pool Driver doesn't support XA driver, Please change your config file to use a Non-XA driver

JDBC driver does not support XA
cannot participate in a two-phase commit
To Force participation set EnableTwoPhaseCommit
property on the corresponding JDBCTxDataSource
property to true
So use an XA driver.
TX usually means "transaction".
1) What is a JDBCTxDataSource - what does the TX mean?
2) I have two data sources and according to BEA
Weblogic docs, setting the property on both won't
solve the problem. I tried.Right - you need XA drivers and JTA for both.
3) When I try to change the data pools to use XA
drivers, I get the following error on server
startup:
java.sql.SQLException: Pool connect failed:
java.lang.Exception: WebLogic Pool Driver doesn't
support XA driver, Please change your config file to
use a Non-XA driverCreate new pools using the XA drivers. Don't reuse the old ones.
Which version of WebLogic? I've made XA work for both 8.1 and 9.1.
%

JDBC driver does not support XA,,hence cannot be a participant in two-phas

Error committing transaction:; nested exception is: javax.transaction.xa.XAException: JDBC driver does not support XA, hence cannot be a participant in two-phase commit. To force this participation, set the GlobalTransactionsProtocol attribute to LoggingLastResource (recommended) or EmulateTwoPhaseCommit for the Data Source = SOADataSource
i have enabled the LoggingLastResource option still it is not working showing the same error.
i have a doubt in this case my datasource is of type XA then is there any need to enable any of the above option(LoggingLastResource (recommended) or EmulateTwoPhaseCommit).
please do reply it has hampered many of the tasks.

Open a support case. You can't even create an XA LLR datasource.

Weblogic Two Phase commit

Dears,
we are facing slowness problem while migration application from weblogic 7 to weblogic 11g.
Our Application use EJB 2.1 CMP and oracle database
In web-logic 7 we use global transaction and emulate two phase commit .Our application works fine
If we set global transaction as last logging resource or Emulate two phase commit in weblogic 11g we found so much slowness in the application.
Kindly help me in this regard

Hi,
          Jolt is just a Java client API for Tuxedo services. Typically, Jolt is
          used by a client to invoke a Tuxedo service. From what I could gather
          from your post, you are probably doing some JDBC work and then calling
          out to a Tuxedo service and want the work done with the JDBC/XA driver
          and the database work done by the Tuxedo service to be comitted/aborted
          transactionally? Is this correct?
          If so, then you probably want to look at the JET API (essentially Jolt
          without the need for a JSL/JSH) for invoking Tuxedo services directly
          (instead of through the JSH) from a WLE Java Server. It should be fully
          capable of doing what I have described above.
          Hope this helps,
          Robert
          Hwa Min Tan wrote:
          > I have read that the WLE 5.1 supports the Open XA standard for
          > two-phase (distributed) commits.
          > However, I have been unable to find any documentation / code
          > samples that demonstrates that JOLT is also able to perform
          > two-phase commits, even though its architecture is
          > inherently Tuxedo.
          > We'd like to use two-phase commit on two separate databases
          > (one connected by Jolt and another using the WLE JDBC/XA driver.
          >
          > Does Jolt support two-phase commit and the Open XA standard?
          >
          > Many thanks for your help,
          >
          > Hwa Min

Configuration of two-phase-commit in OC4J 10.1.2

Configuration of two-phase-commit in OC4J 10.1.2 in application with multiple modules
We have an application ear file consisting of ejb-modules (mdb and slsb) and two web-modules. We are using Oracle's advanced queueing for messaging and CMT (all ejb use the Required transaction attribute). We need different datasources (OrionCMTDataSource) including that for aq, so we need two-phase-commit. The web clients use ejbs and browse the messaging system. Our 'orion-application.xml' includes a commit-coordinator configuration, and the database is setup correctly. The configuration works fine for mdbs, when sending messages to the queues. When a client starts after messages have been sent and consumed by the mdbs, oc4j complains that no commit-coordinator is defined in 'server.xml'. If we start the client first, it can access the queues, but then the mdbs complain. It seems that the first one "gets" the commit-coordinator and the second one fails.
Some questions:
Why isn't the second client type using the commit-coordinator configuration of the "orion-application.xml"?
Is such scenario not supported by OC4J?
How can I setup the application correctly?
How do I configure commit-coordinator with different datasources to the same database? (Commit-Coordinator is also this database)

Take a look 'How to Use a Custom Serializer with Oracle Application Server Web Services' [1].
In your case, you should be looking at BeanMultiRefSerializer (org.apache.soap.encoding.soapenc), which will serialize your data using href and providing a way to deal with cycles.
All the best,
Eric
[1] http://www.oracle.com/technology/tech/webservices/htdocs/samples/serialize/index.html

Data-source.xml - BaseResourceException - two phase commit

Hi,
I am seeing the following exception.   Please let me know how to fix this.
thanks
Sunita
com.sap.engine.services.connector.exceptions.BaseResourceException: The resource "xxx" does not support two-phase commit and cannot be enlisted in the current transaction, because another non supporting two-phase commit resource is already enlisted for component "webContainer/applications/JavaEE/YY-TPRO/YYr-TPRO" in application "JavaEE/YY-TPRO". Only one of the enlisted resources is allowed to be non two-phase commit compliant.
I am using JDBC 1.x datasource, and the .xml looks like this:
<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<!DOCTYPE data-sources SYSTEM 'data-sources.dtd'>
<data-sources>
<application-name>JavaEE/yy-TPRO</application-name>
<data-source>
    <data-source-name>xxx</data-source-name>
    <alias>jdbc/xxyyDB/TPRO</alias>
    <driver-name>OracleThin</driver-name>
    <init-connections>1</init-connections>
    <max-connections>20</max-connections>
    <max-time-to-wait-connection>60</max-time-to-wait-connection>
    <sql-engine>vendor_sql</sql-engine>
    <jdbc-1.x>
      <driver-class-name>oracle.jdbc.driver.OracleDriver</driver-class-name>
      <url>jdbc:oracle:thin:@sol-mercury:1521:hermes</url>
      <user-name>abcd</user-name>
      <password>abcd</password>
    </jdbc-1.x>
</data-source>
</data-sources>

HI,
Thanks for the response, I already went through these threads.
My exception seems to be related to this - Problem with connection sharing if J2EE transaction is running
and suggested solutions seems to be:
The problem is caused when there is an inappropriate attempt to open a second connection in an active JTA transaction. There is either an attempt to get a second connection from an un-shareable non-XA DataSource or an attempt to get it from another non-XA DataSource. You have to:
●     Use no more than one connection from this data source while the JTA transaction is active or
●     Declare the data source as shareable, depending on your application logic.
Question is, How can I make data source as shareable??
This application worked fine in JBoss, weblogic and now we are trying to port it to NetWeaver.
Is any of the above options are configurable in data-sources.xml?
Thanks for your guidance and response.
Surekha

JDBC driver does not support XA

Hello,
we have the following problem when using oracle OCI jDriver from
WebLogic: when connection times out, we get the following error
javax.transaction.xa.XAException: JDBC driver does not support XA, hence
cannot be a participant in two-phase commit. To force this
participation, set the enableTwoPhaseCommit property on the
corresponding JDBCTxDataSourceproperty, to true.
(full message is attached as rtf file). We are not using TxDataSource
pools, just normal connection pools. This error only happens once in a
while. I would appreciate any help.
thanks
Andrey
[error.rtf]

Open a support case. You can't even create an XA LLR datasource.

Two-phase commit

Hi, all.
Does WeblogicServer 5.1sp10 support two-phase commit?
I'm going to use Informix and Oracle.
But I'm not sure that WLS 5.1 support it.
For example,when new record is inserted in Informix,
it must be inserted in oracle.
and update,delete processes must be treated as two-phase commit.
If it support two-phase commit, let me know what i do for using
two-phase commit.
thanks..

Robert wrote:
Hi, all.
Does WeblogicServer 5.1sp10 support two-phase commit?No, you need WLS 6.x
-- Rob
>
I'm going to use Informix and Oracle.
But I'm not sure that WLS 5.1 support it.
For example,when new record is inserted in Informix,
it must be inserted in oracle.
and update,delete processes must be treated as two-phase commit.
If it support two-phase commit, let me know what i do for using
two-phase commit.
thanks..

2 Phase Commit Global Transaction resolution question.

Hi All,
I hope this is the right place to ask this question.
I'm trying to figure out what generally happens after the JTA AbandonTimeout occurs.
Here is the scenario.
1. Transaction Manager sends Commit to Resource Managers 1 and 2.
2. Resource Manager 1 receives and processes commit. Resource Manager 2 doesn't receive commit.
3. Resource Manager 1 returns acknowledgement.
4. Transaction Manager times out and starts recovery process.
5. Resource Manager 2 session times out and is set to in-doubt.
6. Transaction Manager can never reconnect to Resource Manager 2, and the AbandonTimeout is reached.
7. Transaction Manager abandons RM2 transaction.
8. Does Transaction manager return an error for global transaction?
I'm guessing the application the Transaction Manager is working for has its own timeouts which would most likely be a smaller value than the abandon timeout. So the transaction would most likely timeout. I'm just trying to make sure that the Global Transaction is not sent back as complete at a later time if the abandon timeout is reached.
Any Thoughts?
Thanks,
Matt

Petr-
In article <avflf9$ccu$[email protected]>, Petr Bulanek wrote:
Hi Marc,
Well, what does it really mean that \'Kodo will not respect the
semantics of the 2-phase-commit protocol\'?Are you saying that Kodo may commit my changes even if the other datastore
decides to roll the transaction back at the last moment?
That if Kodo has difficulties to commit, it would not roolback the global
transaction and as a result the other datastores will commit?You are correct: we currently do not do anything special for 2 phase
commit at all.
I mean, this is quite important and would like to know exactly what to
expect so I can work around it.
Thank you,
Petr
P.S.
I \'think\' I saw the plan to fix this in 2.5.x. What is the planned
release date?It is in the milestone for 2.5. We can't make any committments on its
release date, but it will hopefully be out within 2 months.
Marc Prud\'hommeaux wrote:
Petr-
You can integrate Kodo\'s JDO transactions into the Application Server\'s
global transaction (which might also commit multiple other
transactions). The only issue is that Kodo will not respect the
semantics of the 2-phase-commit protocol.
We expect to have this issue resolved soon.
In article <avdri3$f2o$[email protected]>, Petr Bulanek wrote:
I have noticed that there is open bug (211) that refers to 2 phase commit
and I just curious what the exact problem is.
Does that imply that the current version (2.4) does not allow 2 phase
commit?
Let\'s say I need to integrate JDO into global transaction (managed by App
server) and I may need during that transaction update multiple databases.
It could be implemented via JDO (multiple PMFs) or it could be a
combination of JDO and JDBC/EJB happening during the same transaction.
Am I likely to hit a problem if I do that?
Thank you,
Petr
Marc Prud\'hommeaux [email protected]
SolarMetric Inc. http://www.solarmetric.com
Marc Prud'hommeaux [email protected]
SolarMetric Inc. http://www.solarmetric.com

2 phase commit in 9ias

I have a need to update 2 databases within a transaction, so I need to perform a 2 phase commit operation. I was wondering if
oracle 9ias v1.0.2.2.1 Solaris supports this type of operation. I can not seem to find it in the documentations.
thanks in advance.
Michael

Michael -- A true two phase commit is supported in Oracle9iAS v902 onwards. For v1022x what you get are two separate single phase commits. Please have a look at the Oracle9iAS J2EE Services Guide under transactions for more information.
Thanks -- Jeff

Scope of one phase commit optimization?

Hello,
I am unclear about the scope across which Tuxedo XA can optimize the commit to a one phase commit when there is only a single resource involved.
Is it just the process?
Or is it the group (same TM)?
Based on the XA specification, it is the connection that matters. The one phase commit is only possible if a single connection is involved.
However, in the Tuxedo case, the Transaction Manager is shared amongst all the processes in a group. Therefore, the Transaction Manager could be aware that only one Resource Manager is involved, even when the transaction spans multiple processes (within the group). Thus from the TM perspective, a one phase commit would be possible. But then again the Resource Manager would have to support that too.
The context for this is Tuxedo 11, ATMI, XA and Oracle 11g. Some transactions use /Q and DB (requiring XA and two phase commit), other transactions only affect the DB.
Thanks...
Roger

Hi Roger,
I'm not sure where the idea that one-phase commit is "only possible if a single connection is involved."? Here is the description of the one phase commit optimization from the XA specification:
"One-phase Commit
A TM can use one-phase commit if it knows that there is only one RM anywhere in
the DTP system that is making changes to shared resources. In this optimisation,
the TM makes its Phase 2 commit request without having made a Phase 1 prepare
request. Since the RM decides the outcome of the transaction branch and forgets
about the transaction branch before returning to the TM, there is no need for the TM
to record stably these global transactions and, in some failure cases, the TM may not
know the outcome."
The TM can also get back read-only from an RM on prepare and use that to decide to perform a one-phase commit if there had only been one other RM involved.
IIRC Tuxedo decides to do a one-phase commit if there is only one group involved in the transaction. So if you have two groups accessing the database, I don't believe Tuxedo will perform a one-phase commit, even if the two groups are connected to the same RM.
Regards,
Todd Little
Oracle Tuxedo Chief Architect

Need JDBC 2-phase commit support

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for