Nested Classes and Static Methods

I was perusing the Java Tutorials on Nested Classes and I came across this...
[http://java.sun.com/docs/books/tutorial/java/javaOO/nested.html|http://java.sun.com/docs/books/tutorial/java/javaOO/nested.html]
I was reading the documentation and I read a slightly confusing statement. I was hoping some further discussion could clarify the matter. The documentation on "Nested Classes" says (I highlighted the two statements, in bold, I am having trouble piecing together.)
Static Nested Classes
As with class methods and variables, a static nested class is associated with its outer class. And like static class methods, a static nested class cannot refer directly to instance variables or methods defined in its enclosing class ? it can use them only through an object reference.
Note: A static nested class interacts with the instance members of its outer class (and other classes) just like any other top-level class. In effect, a static nested class is behaviorally a top-level class that has been nested in another top-level class for packaging convenience.
So this means a nested static inner class CANNOT refer to its own instanced variables, like a normal static method, but CAN refer to its outer class instanced variables?

So this means a nested static inner class CANNOT refer to its own instanced variables, like a normal static method, but CAN refer to its outer class instanced variables?No, it means that a static nested class cannot refer to instance variables of its enclosing class. Example:public class Foo {
    int i;
    static class Bar {
        int j = i; // WRONG! Bar class is static context
}~

Similar Messages

  • Abstract classes and static methods

    I have an abstract report class AbstractReportClass which I am extending in multiple report classes (one for each report, say ReportA, ReportB, ...). Each report class has its own static column definitions, title, etc., which I have to access through a static method getDataMeta() in a web application. Each report has the same exact code in getDataMeta, and no report may exist without these fields. My intuition tells me that AbstractReportClass should contain the code for getDataMeta, but I know that you can't mix abstract and static keywords.
    Am I missing a simple solution to unify the getDataMeta code in the abstract base class? or do I really need to have a static function getDataMeta with the same code in each of the base classes?
    My apologies if this has been discussed many times before.
    Thanks,
    -Andrew

    I'm not trying to be "right"; rather I just asked a question about whether I can do something that seems intuitive. Perhaps you might write code in a different way than I would or perhaps I wasn't clear about every little detail about my code? Do you regularly belittle people who ask questions here?
    I have a loadFromDB() member function in AbstractReport for which all sub classes have an overloaded version. All reports I'm displaying have 4 common fields (a database id and a name and a monetary value, for example), but then each other report has additional fields it loads from the database. Inside ReportX classes' loadFromDB(), I call the superclass loadFromDB() function and augment values to get a completely loaded object. In fact, the loadedData member object resides in AbstractReport.
    I can't use a report unless it has these common features. Every report is an AbstractReport. There is common functionality built on top of common objects. Isn't this the point of inheritance? I'm essentially saying that abstract class Shape has a getArea function and then I'm defining multiple types of Shapes (e.g. Rectangle and Circle) to work with...

  • Singleton pattern class and static class

    Hi,
    what is difference between the singleton pattern class and static class ?
    in singleton pattern, we declare a static member[which hold one value at a time] ,static method[ which return static member value] and a private constructor[not allow to direct instantiation]. My words are -- as a singleton pattern we implement static class .
    so can we say a singleton pattern is static class it means both are same or is any difference between these two ??

    malcolmmc wrote:
    On several occasions I've had to convert a static (never instanceated) class to a singleton type, for example because I realise I need an instance per thread, or I decide to make a program more modular, with more than one configuration.
    I've never done the opposite.
    So generally I favour the singleton if there any "state" involved, because it's more flexible in unanticipated directions. It also gives extra flexibility when building tests, especially if you program to an interface.Total agreement; if anything it is dead hard to override static method logic with mock code in unit tests (I had to do it by keeping the static methods in place but making them internally use a singleton instance of itself of which the instance variable could be overwritten with a mock implementation for unit testing purposes...).
    'Static classes' and/or methods are great for very simple util functions, but I wouldn't use them for anything other than that.

  • Compiling Nested Classes and Interfaces

    I am looking for documentation about compiling nested classes and interfaces. I have found something in the JVM Specification, but there does not explain how a nested class is compiled and what is included in the top level class to mark a "place holder" to the nested class. The JVM Specification in this topic cite the web page http://java.sun.com/products/jdk/1.1/docs/guide/innerclasses/spec/innerclasses.doc.html that does not exists any more.
    My root problem is that: I am compiling a class with a private nested class, but in the class file generated TopLevelClass$NestedClass.class the class does not have the private modifier. So I am not understanding why the "private" modifier was removed during compilation.
    I performed the same test with a protected nested class and the result was the nested class with the public modifier. So I am not understanding why the "protected" modifier was changed to "public".
    Thanks in advance,
    Mardoqueu.

    This should not be happening. What compiler are you using? If it's a reasonably recent Sun compiler, could you post a minimal example?

  • What's the differences between a singleton and a class with static methods

    Hi everybody.
    My question is in the subject. Perhaps "differences" is not the good word. The positive and negative points ?
    Imagine you have to write a connection pool, sure you gonna choose a singleton but why ?
    Thank you very much.

    A class is a class. Java doesn't have (and I wish it
    did) a static outer class. Any class can extend
    another class or implement an interface.A Class object cannot extend or implement anything - it is not under programmer control in any way. You can create a class which implements interfaces, but calling static methods is completely unrelated. Interfaces only affect instance methods, not class ones. I think all of your comparison to C++ is actually confusing you more. In Java, there is a real class object at runtime, as opposed to C++.
    YATArchivist makes a good point about being able to
    serialize, altho I've not met that desire in practice.
    Maybe a concrete example would help.
    mattbunch makes another point that I don't understand.
    A class can implement an interface whether it sticks
    its data in statics or in a dobject, so I guess I
    still don't get that one.See my comment above. Static methods are free from all contractual obligations.
    I prefer instance singletons to singleton classes because they are more flexible to change. For instance I created a thread pool singleton which worked by passing the instance around, but later I needed two thread pools so I made a slight modification to the class and poof! no more singleton and 99% of my code compiled cleanly against it.
    When possible, I prefer to hand the instance off from object to object rather than have everything call Singleton.instance() since it makes changes like I mentioned earlier more feasible.

  • Nested classes and separate files in Javadoc...

    Hello. I am writing an application, and it has several .java files, and some of the classes contained therein contain nested classes, for example
    ClassOne.java
    class ClassOne
    // stuff
       class innerClassOne
          //more stuff
    }ClassTwo.java
    class ClassTwo
    // stuff
       class innerClassTwo
          //more stuff
    }What I want to do is generate documentation like the online java documentation for my app, that is, documentation that will contain ALL the classes and nested classes involved, and link everything that comes in java already to the sun online java docs.
    I've figured out the -link command for javadoc, and I can make that work, but I've run into some other snags.
    1.) Javadoc isn't finding or documenting my nested classes, despite them being marked up. Google does not wish to help.
    2.) Some classes reference other classes of mine that aren't conatined in the same .java file, but do exist in their own .java files in the dame local directory. Javadoc does not like this, and gives errors.
    3.) Running javadoc on one file at a time overwrites the old file's documentation, thus I cannot seem to get an index.html javadoc file that links to all my classes, nor can I get the classes to link to each other.
    What do I need to do to fix these?

    So this means a nested static inner class CANNOT refer to its own instanced variables, like a normal static method, but CAN refer to its outer class instanced variables?No, it means that a static nested class cannot refer to instance variables of its enclosing class. Example:public class Foo {
        int i;
        static class Bar {
            int j = i; // WRONG! Bar class is static context
    }~

  • Nested classes and GUI integration

    I have a GUI class called ArenaHelperGUI and an ArenaHelperRunner that's supposed to store the data taken from the text fields in the GUI and later do some calculations on it. The GUI is nested within the runner, but it can't do anything to the runner's variables, or call its functions.
    Here's the runner:
    package arenahelper;
    * @author Greg
    public class ArenaHelperRunner {
        ArenaHelperGUI gui;
        String args[];
        String[] oneTwo;
        String[] fourFive;
        String[] sixSeven;
        String[] nineTen;
        String[] elevenTwelve;
        String[] fourteenFifteen;
        String[] sixteenSeventeen;
        String[] nineteenTwenty;
        ArenaHelperRunner()
            gui = new ArenaHelperGUI();
            gui.main(args);
            oneTwo = new String[4];
            fourFive = new String[4];
            sixSeven = new String[4];
            nineTen = new String[4];
            elevenTwelve = new String[4];
            fourteenFifteen = new String[4];
            sixteenSeventeen = new String[4];
            nineteenTwenty = new String[4];
        public void test()
            System.out.println("TEST");
    } The GUI was generated by Netbeans, and it's supposed to interact with the variables in the runner when one of the buttons is pressed:
        private void jButton1ActionPerformed(java.awt.event.ActionEvent evt) {
            test();
            System.out.println(oneTwo[0]);
        } The call to test and println both give "cannot find symbol".
    If anyone knows how to fix this or can suggest a better way to implement it, I'll be very grateful =)

    farshmak wrote:
    I have a GUI class called ArenaHelperGUI and an ArenaHelperRunner that's supposed to store the data taken from the text fields in the GUI and later do some calculations on it. The GUI is nested within the runner, but it can't do anything to the runner's variables, or call its functions.
    ArenaHelperRunner()
    gui = new ArenaHelperGUI();
    gui.main(args);
    oneTwo = new String[4];
    fourFive = new String[4];
    sixSeven = new String[4];
    nineTen = new String[4];
    elevenTwelve = new String[4];
    fourteenFifteen = new String[4];
    sixteenSeventeen = new String[4];
    nineteenTwenty = new String[4];
    }Spot the magic number. I suggest setting a variable size = 4 and initializing each array to size. It will make your code more elegant and easier to maintain.
    The call to test and println both give "cannot find symbol".Its good to separate the GUI and logic however you can't call a non static method from Class A within Class B without instantiating an instance of Class A first.
    e.g. within Class B
    ArenaHelperRunner runner = new ArenaHelperRunner();
    runner.test();Mel

  • Using a non-static vector in a generic class with static methods

    I have a little problem with a class (the code is shown underneath). The problem is the Assign method. This method should return a clone (an exact copy) of the set given as an argument. When making a new instance of a GenericSet (with the Initialize method) within the Assign method, the variables of the original set and the clone have both a reference to the same vector, while there exists two instances of GenericSet. My question is how to refer the clone GenericSet's argument to a new vector instead of the existing vector of the original GenericSet. I hope you can help me. Thanks
    package genericset;
    import java.util.*;
    public class GenericSet<E>{
    private Vector v;
    public GenericSet(Vector vec) {
    v = vec;
    private <T extends Comparable> Item<T> get(int index) {
    return (Item<T>) v.get(index);
    public static <T extends Comparable> GenericSet<T> initialize() {
    return new GenericSet<T>(new Vector());
    public Vector getVector() {
    return v;
    public static <T extends Comparable> GenericSet<T> insert (GenericSet<T> z, Item<T> i){
    GenericSet<T> g = assign(z);
    Vector v = g.getVector();
    if (!member(g,i))
    v.addElement(i);
    return g;
    public static <T extends Comparable> GenericSet<T> delete(GenericSet<T> z, Item<T> i){
    GenericSet<T> g = assign(z);
    Vector v = g.getVector();
    if (member(g,i))
    v.remove(i);
    return g;
    public static <T extends Comparable> boolean member(GenericSet<T> z, Item<T> i) {
    Vector v = z.getVector();
    return v.contains(i);
    public static <T extends Comparable> boolean equal(GenericSet<T> z1, GenericSet<T> z2) {
    Vector v1 = z1.getVector();
    Vector v2 = z2.getVector();
    if((v1 == null) && (v2 != null))
    return false;
    return v1.equals(v2);
    public static <T extends Comparable> boolean empty(GenericSet<T> z) {
    return (cardinality(z) == 0);
    public static <T extends Comparable> GenericSet<T> union(GenericSet<T> z1, GenericSet<T> z2) {
    GenericSet<T> g = assign(z1);
    for(int i=0; i<cardinality(z2); i++) {
    Item<T> elem = z2.get(i);
    insert(g, elem);
    return g;
    public static <T extends Comparable> GenericSet<T> intersection(GenericSet<T> z1, GenericSet<T> z2) {
    GenericSet<T> g = initialize();
    for(int i=0; i<cardinality(z2); i++) {
    Item<T> elem = z2.get(i);
    if(member(z1, elem))
    insert(g, elem);
    return g;
    public static <T extends Comparable> GenericSet<T> difference(GenericSet<T> z1, GenericSet<T> z2) {
    GenericSet<T> g = initialize();
    for(int i=0; i<cardinality(z1); i++) {
    Item<T> elem = z1.get(i);
    if(!member(z2, elem))
    insert(g, elem);
    for(int i=0; i<cardinality(z2); i++) {
    Item<T> elem = z2.get(i);
    if(!member(z1, elem))
    insert(g, elem);
    return g;
    public static <T extends Comparable> GenericSet<T> assign(GenericSet<T> z) {
    GenericSet<T> g = initialize();
    for(int i=0; i<cardinality(z); i++) {
    Item<T> elem = z.get(i);
    insert(g, elem);
    return g;
    public static <T extends Comparable> boolean subset(GenericSet<T> z1, GenericSet<T> z2) {
    for(int i=0; i<cardinality(z1); i++) {
    Item<T> elem = z1.get(i);
    if(!member(z2, elem))
    return false;
    return true;
    public static <T extends Comparable> int cardinality(GenericSet<T> z){
    Vector v = z.getVector();
    return v.size();
    }

    The issue is not "reference a non-static interface", but simply that you cannot reference a non-static field in a static method - what value of the field ed would the static method use? Seems to me your findEditorData should look something like this:   public static EditorBean findEditorData( String username, EditorBean editorData )
          return editorData.ed.findEditor( username );
       }

  • How to get the class name  static method which exists in the parent class

    Hi,
    How to know the name of the class or reference to instance of the class with in the main/static method
    in the below example
    class AbstA
    public static void main(String[] args)
    System.out.println(getXXClass().getName());
    public class A extends AbstA
    public class B extends AbstA
    on compile all the class and run of
    java A
    should print A as the name
    java B
    should print B as the name
    Are there any suggestions to know the class name in the static method, which is in the parent class.
    Regards,
    Raja Nagendra Kumar

    Well, there's a hack you can use, but if you think you need it,Could you let me the hack solution for this..
    you probably have a design flaw and/or a misunderstanding about how to use Java.)May be, but my needs seems to be very genuine..of not repeat the main method contents in every inherited class..
    The need we have is this
    I have the test cases inheriting from common base class.
    When the main method of the test class is run, it is supposed to find all other test cases, which belong to same package and subpackages and create a entire suite and run the entire suite.
    In the above need of the logic we wrote in the main method could handle any class provided it knows what is the child class from which this main is called.
    I applicate your inputs on a better way to design without replicating the code..
    In my view getClass() should have been static as the instance it returns is one for all its instances of that class.
    I know there are complications the way compiler handles static vars and methods.. May be there is a need for OO principals to advance..
    Regards,
    Raja Nagendra Kumar
    Edited by: rajanag on Jul 26, 2009 6:03 PM

  • Private inner class and static private inner

    Hi,
    I understand the concept and usage of inner classes in general.
    When should we go for a private inner class and when for a static private inner class? I tried searching but it wasn't of much help.
    Basically I need to design a caching solution in which I need to timestamp the data object. After timestamping, data will be stored in a HashMap or some other collection. I'm planning to use a wrapper class (which is inner and private) which holds the data object and timestamp. I can make the program work by using either normal inner class or static inner class, however would like to know which is better in such case. Also If I can get some general guidelines as to when to use a staic inner class and when to use a normal inner class, it would help me.
    Thanks in advance.

    user1995721 wrote:
    When should we go for a private inner class and when for a static private inner class?
    I can make the program work by using either normal inner class or static inner class, however would like to know which is better
    If I can get some general guidelines as to when to use a static inner class and when to use a normal inner class, it would help me.Making the inner class static is helpful in that it limits visibility.
    If the inner class needs to access non-static fields or methods from the containing class instance
    the inner class has to be non-static.

  • Why can't inner classes have static methods?

    I just tried to add a static method to an inner class, which would have been useful for extracting constants about said inner class, and it turns out that is not allowed.
    Of course I have other ways to code what I wanted, but I'm curious as to why this restriction was set in place. Anybody know?

    Probably because an inner class is tied to an instance of the enclosing class. I think that, conceptually at least, the inner class' definition itself only exists in the context of an instance of the enclosing class. While I'm sure it would have been technically possible to allow it, it would be confusing and not make a whole lot of sense--what is the static context for the inner class, since the class only exists in a non-static context?

  • Datacorruption and static methods

    public static void myMethod( String Argument)
         int i = 0 ;
    What are the chances of data corruption in this static method?
    IF there are chances of data corruption, am I corrupt in saying that chances of data corruption for argument and Variable i are same?
    Where is function state stored in static method stored? What will happen to this if one thread pre-empts other?
    public class a
         int j;
         public static void myMethod( String Argument)
              int i = 0 ;
    How is integer j different from integer i? Where will JVM keep these variables ?

    What are the chances of data corruption in this static
    method? None. As long as this static method only acts on local variables (variables declared inside the method) each call to the method is completely separate from any other call.
    Where is function state stored in static method
    stored? What will happen to this if one thread
    pre-empts other?I'm not sure what you mean by 'function state' but static methods are not associated with an Object, though they can modify and depend on the state of static (class) varaivbles.
    How is integer j different from integer i? Where will
    JVM keep these variables ? j is a member varaible. It is associated wth the instance of the class. i is a local variable and is created at the beginning of a method call and destroyed (eventually) after the method completes.

  • Generics and static methods

    Hi,
    I need a sanity check to make sure I have not missed design pattern.
    I believe that it is not possible to call a static method defined in a generic type.
    For example:
    public class Red extends Color
        public static Color getHue()
    public class Green extends Color
        public static Color getHue()
    public class GenericColorTest<C extends Color>
        public void fooBar()
             Color hue= C.getHue();  // Is this a valid method call ?
    }Since the base class Color can not define static methods, it seems resonable that a generic type can't make the call to get getHue(). Or am I missing something ? Is there a way for the class GenericColorTest's generic type C to call a static method ?
    Thanks
    HB

    I think I can be ever more specific than gafter on this.
    Your call, "C.getHue()", just plain makes no sense. C is "some kind of Color object", and the class "Color" has no function (static or not) called "getHue()". So calling "C.getHue()" is a simple case of you trying to call a function that isn't in the class.
    In fact you can call static functions, but only if they are in the base class require by the generic definition (erm, sorry can't remember the exact term right now). So, for example, if there was a "getHue()" static function in your class "Color", then sure, you can call "C.getHue()" in your code. But since static functions can't be overridden, the "C.getHue()" will do exactly the same thing no matter which actual class C was at the moment, which doesn't seem to be what you want.
    The right thing to do is just make "getHue()" non-static. Then things will work great.

  • Extending classes and overriding methods

    If I have a class which extends another, and overrides some methods, if I from a third class casts the extending class as the super class and calls one of the methods which gets overrided, is it the overrided method or the method of the superclass which get executed?
    Stig.

    Explicit cast can't enable the object to invoke super-class's method. Because dynamic binding is decided by the instance. The cast can just prevent you from using methods only defined in sub-class, but it does not let the object to use super-class's method, if the method's been overrided. Otherwise, the polymophism, which is one of the most beautiful feature of Object-Oriented thing, can't be achieved. As far as I know, the only way to use super-class's method is the super keyword in the sub-class, and seems no way for an object to do the same thing (I may wrong, since I haven't read the language spec).
    here's a small test:
    public class Test {
    public static void main(String[] args){
    A a = new B();
    a.method();
    ((A)a).method();
    class A{
    public void method(){
    System.out.println("A's method");
    class B extends A{
    public void method(){
    System.out.println("B's method");
    The output is:
    B's method
    B's method

  • Data Curruption and Static methods

    public static void myMethod( String Argument)
         int i = 0 ;
    What are the chances of data corruption in this static method?
    IF there are chances of data corruption, am I corrupt in saying that chances of data corruption for argument and Variable i are same?
    Where is function state stored in static method stored? What will happen to this if one thread pre-empts other?
    public class a
         int j;
         public static void myMethod( String Argument)
              int i = 0 ;
    How is integer j different from integer i? Where will JVM keep these variables ?

    Sorry The
    int j ;
    should have been
    static int j;
    I thought the behaviour of a variable in a static method will be same as static variable.

Maybe you are looking for

  • Windows 7 RC Install on Unibody MBP went BEAUTIFULLY!!

    I recently installed Windows 7 RC on my unibody Macbook Pro (late model, 2008) using Boot Camp and everything went very smoothly! So I thought I'd right a post to possibly help other users through some minor glitches that I ran into that I was able t

  • How to stop BT posting to me about new promotions.

    Hello, I have my email for marketing consent set to 'no' but i see no option to stop snailmail. Is there one to stop me receiving BT promotions through the post? I received a letter suggesting i could change my phone package only a few days after my

  • Using Conditional To Determine Select Statement

    I am not sure if anyone knows if I can do this, but I am trying to use some determining factor based upon a value as to which query to run-. Something like: DECODE('INBOUND',      'INBOUND', SELECT 'I' FROM DUAL,      'OUTBOUND', SELECT 'O' FROM DUAL

  • Oracle blob class problem

    Hello again. I have the following code: java.sql.ResultSet resultSetForUpdate = stat.executeQuery("select picture from some_table where some_id=" + someId + " for update"); java.sql.Blob blob = resultSetForUpdate.getBlob(1); // here is some code that

  • Usb 3.0 camera black screen

    I am using a Basler USB 3.0 ace camera. The first problem I am meeting is in the Measurement & Automation Explorer, the camera only shows black screen under both 'grab' and 'snap'. I changed the exposure time and brightness, the problem still remains