New Mac Pro - Best bang for the buck

I'm looking to replace my G5 2.7 with a new MP. I'll be running Logic, Reason, Photoshop, Dreamweaver, video conversion, ...
I'm thinking about either the Two 2.4GHz Quad-Core Intel Xeon “Westmere” (8 cores) with 8GB ram
or
One 3.2GHz Quad-Core Intel Xeon “Nehalem” [Add $360.00] with 6GB ram
I know the dual Westmere will be faster but will it be $1k faster and will the software I run support the 2 processors?
Thanks for any input!!

That test session has been run on many different machines, it has become somewhat of a standard benchmark session for Logic users. For comparison, quad machines at considerably lower clock speed have done 50 tracks when the six core at 3.33 only does 45-47 (another 6 core user tested and confirmed the same result). I'm not sure what he means by "a lot of Logic is single threaded" since Logic can generally use up to eight cores - since he has only tested on one machine and not made any comparisons, he makes some conclusions that aren't correct.
http://www.gearslutz.com/board/music-computers/371545-logic-pro-multicore-benchm arktest.html

Similar Messages

  • Capture Cards fro Premiere: What is best bang for the buck

    I am looking to upgrade to the new Premiere and I am having a computer built for it. I wanted to find out what would be the best solution for capture cards. I will be wanting to capture analog (S-video cable) video in larger chunks, maybe up to 30 minutes or more. But doing this through firewire in the past, the audio would get out of sinc. What capture card has the best bang for the buck to accomplish this?

    The challenge of using 3rd party tools (sw and hw) to bolster PPRO is you will be forever in the game of updating drivers here and there to make sure this or that works with that or this. Then when adobe updates their sw, the game begins anew with no guarantee of anything working together.
    So; the promise of faster and better comes at a price of complexity and sometimes frailty and often a very short life. Well worth it for some; nightmare for others.
    Consider a simple A/D converter for acquiring analog sd video. Or a cam with analog passthr.
    Curt Wrigley

  • My new computer build, good bang for the buck?

    I'm just starting out with CS 5.5, need a new computer, and want a solid base for upgrading as I go. I think I'm on the right track but uncertain of the video card.
    Intel 970 six core
    Asus Rampage III 1366 X58 ATX
    MSI Lightning GTX 580 3072MB
    Asus PA246Q 24''
    #3 (total 24GB) G. Skill Ripjaws 8GB (2x4GB) 24O-Pin DDR3 1600 (PC312800) F3-1280CL9D08GBRL
    #6 Samsung F3 3.0 7200 32MB
    Corsair Series Gold 850 WAtt Power Suppy
    Antec Kuhlen H20 920 CPU Cooling System
    Logotec 500 corded mouse
    Logetec corded slim line back lit
    Lain Li A77F case
    I'm uncertain if the GTX 580 3GB video card ($475) is overkill? The other options are GTX 570 2.5 MB ($375) GTX 560 2MB ($225)
    I've read all the reviews but there are mostly gamers who have more than one card.
    Will the GTX 560 2MB be good enough? It's appealing because of the 2GB and the $225. If this could work for the next year few years then the GTX 580 may be down to $200. I just don't have much experience with video processing, how many layers I'll be using, etc. Or are all of these poor choices because they don't have the copper tubing?
    When I upgrade I'll add a RAID card. For now I'll just start with the 6 Samsung and use a few for backups as I go along. Maybe I'll need to order more or another external back up sooner than later. Hope that makes sense. My approach is to get started then upgrade. I don't need to win any bench mark test but want a computer that's reasonably fast, upgradeable, reliable and have a long life.
    Oh yeah, I had no idea about the keyboard and mouse so just went with a wired one as it will be on a desktop.
    So does this look like a well balanced approach? Does anything look excessive or insufficiant?
    Thanks for bearing with me. This forum has been a great resource! Of couse you recognize the parts from other recent builds. I've been doing a lot of reseach and really looking forward to getting this together.
    thanks again!
    John C

    Yes, Frederic, some of the parts should look familiar! Your approach was really interesting how you were concerned about cooling and air flow. I actually had ordered most of it, including the MB, kayboard and mouse, last Thursday, then decided to go with the same case instead of the Half X and the CPU cooler, so I'm really glad you posted your system when you did.
    Really appreciate the feed back. As far as what codec I'll be using, I suppose the ones that are the most versatile and most often used. I would like it to be capable to handle professional work standards yet not overkill. Do most editors use native and a codec for ACHDV? I was planning on the AVID codec and probably the CinaForm. A week ago I was put off by spending $100 for a codec but now that I'm configuring the hardware that might be a good option. I just don't know how to put all this into perspective until I get a real idea of the work flow; if it will save minutes or hours off the edit time.
    I was confused about the disk performance. Thanks a bunch for pointing that out. I must have misunderstood some of the post, as I was under the impression that the SATA II disk 3.0 32 mb exceeded the throughput of the SATA connection, however you are saying that’s not the case with a RAID card, and that the RAID card with a decent disk set up would be best approach to improve the performance as opposed to more VRAM on the video card.
    I am planning a good raid configuration in the near future so will get the SATA III. It's nice to be able to upgrade like that. I also want a good RAID card and the RAID will be also for redundancy. I may even have to go with a 10000 RPM primary drive like yours as those appear to be a nice boost. I planned to start off with 4 disk set up with a few disk for backups and ordered 6 disk. I was going to look into that next and didn't even realize the SATA III was on the MB. I'll probably be shooting a lot just to learn how to process the video, and once I start processing quality video I'll upgrade the RAID and backup.
    Ok, off to see if I can cancel the Samsung order, gotta love Amazon for that.
    Have a great day and thanks again!

  • Bang for the buck board and ram ?

    well ive looked thru the sticky about ram and i really dont feel like spending an hour looking thru a million posts of each persons different experience with different ram
    so
    whats my best nvidia based mobo to get and which ram ?
    or which is going to be the best bang for the buck ?
    k8n neo fsr ? k8n neo fs2r  k8n neo platinum ?  too many different boards.
    and if i dot his 64 bit jump and fork out all this money which is actually better the nvidia or the via based boards.
    also if you know for sure which cpu is going to be the best bang for the buck.
    im not trying to go cheap i just dont have alot of money to throw around, if i do this i want to do it right the firs time.

    Kingston 400MHz 512MB CL3
    thats pretty much the same mem that i have CL3 @ 400mhz.
    im still torn between a nforce or via board.
    i just havent heard much good about either chipset over the last few years. they both have had some serious issues especially in the AGP driver area. and that i dont need to have problems with.
    overall im getting the sneaky feeling that there isnt much difference from teh nforce or the via, but maybe the nforce is better. also i get the picture that the 64's arent really good for much unless your a gamer.
    windows and everything else isnt going to run any better then my current rig.
    can anyone confirm or deny this ?
    im also curious for those who switched to amd 64's  what was your old computer ? did you make a big leap from an old POS to the 64 or was it a newer system. meaning if you were on a newer system and went to the 64, are you seeing a drastic difference in performance and how well programs and windows runs ? or is it about the same, until you start gaming ?
    i just wont throw a bunch of $$$ out there until i know its worth it to do it. but like i said if gaming is the only good thing, along with maybe audio and video converting, then i aint gunna do it. it isnt feasible for me, i need a cpu and mobo that kicks the snot out of what i got. which i why ive commented before maybe i just need to wait another year.
    but thats why im here asking for you gentleman's thoughts.

  • Upgrade bang for the buck?

    With the increasing percentage of time I'm spending on HD projects as well as Motion work, I need to speed up my setup. I'm weighing bang for the buck between investing in my current machine or scrapping it and buying a new machine. My principle issues are:
    1) I need to be able to drive a 32" HD display for my clients in addition to my 20" monitor. Can't afford a broadcast HD monitor so I'm using a consumer display.
    2) Need to improve render times on FCP and Motion
    3) Would like to improve compression time for QT output
    If you had $2500 for upgrades or $4000 for a new machine (assuming I can sell this rig for $1500) what would you do? New video card, increase ram, faster disk i/o? New quad processor xeon machine (on the low end of the spectrum)? I'm struggling with whether it's worth putting considerable money into a G5 machine in this Xeon world.
    Any advice is appreciated. Thanks.

    Not exactly sure how to tackle this. But the bottom line is: get a new machine! There's a couple ways to view it, I suppose:
    1. Performance: Let's say you spend only the $2,500 on 'upgrades' to the G5. That's (about) 62% of the $4,000 route. Will that G5 perform 62% as well as a new Mac Pro. My guess is: no. The new Mac Pro will so handily spank that G5 that it's not even a contest.
    2. Upgrades: whatever the fastest GFX card you can get into that G5 is a finite element. If you get a Mac Pro you could start with the "stock" card which is probably on par with the best of the G5 candidates. You could then upgrade to an ATI 3870. If you waited a little bit you could upgrade to the ATI 4870. (Not available yet.) Point being: the best options out there for the Mac Pro trounce the G5's options and we haven't even seen the end of the tunnel yet.
    3. Longevity: let's peek into a worst case scenario: You spend $2,500 on 'upgrades' and the G5 poops out. Motherboard meltdown or something that renders it a doorstop. What recourse is there then? If you buy new, you've got a warranty and the ability to extend that as well. I like that peace of mind personally.
    4. Future: Things are only going to grow more and more optimized for Leopard (and beyond) and the Intel platform. The PowerPC is already starting to get phased out. For example, Adobe has said After Effects CS4 will not even run on PowerPC. You can't expect any vendors - even Apple - to continue to focus on PPC when those resources can be put to optimizing the present and future: Intel & Leopard.
    Just my 2 cents worth. But if it were me, I'd bust out the buffing cloth, put it to work, and introduce that G5 to some new friends over here.

  • When watching my Apple TV (3rd gen) the picture jumps a few frame every few seconds, this happens when I rent a film or play back from my new Mac Pro, my Wifi is the Airport Express.

    When watching my Apple TV (3rd gen) the picture jumps a few frames every few seconds, this happens when I rent a film or play back from my new Mac Pro, my Wifi is the Airport Express.

    These may be different issues, but lets look at rentals first.
    Poor motion can result from mismatched output. If your source is 24 or 30 fps you should set the output of the Apple TV to 60 Hz, for 25 fps content use 50 Hz.
    Additionally motion software on the TV itself can cause the picture to jump, check your TV settings and turn off any motion settings in use,

  • Can video cards for the new Mac Pro be installed in the field?

    Current Configuration of the new Mac Pro is as follows:
          ACES MacPro Workstation Seat
    Processor
    6-Core/3.5GHz/Xeon E5
    Memory
    32 GB
    Graphics
    2X AMD FirePro D500
    Hard Disk
    1 TB
    Display
    24" LED / HP
    Media Player
    2GB FIPS USB Drive
    Mouse
    Apple Magic Mouse
    Keyboard
    USB
    Ports
    4-USB 3.0;
    6-Thunderbolt
    1- HDMI
    Netwk Interface
    Ethernet/802.11n
    Card Reader
    NIST SP 800 Compliant
    My question is can the Graphic Display cards be removed and replaced in the field by an experience Mac Technician?
    Any special tools required?

    Now here is the back, showing the heatsink paste still in place, and the thermal pads used to cool the RAM chips to the central cooler:
    note that the two cards are not interchangeable -- they have their power lugs on opposite sides. One card has chips to support actual display output to the thunderbolt Busses, the other card has none, but has the custom micro-PCIE slot for the PCIe SSD "stick".
    One reason for this design is that to make a leap forward, you would have to water-cool the slots for a traditional form-factor PCIe slot Mac pro. Then do it again to include a second GPU. In my opinion, this model Mac Pro is about conquering the cooling problem of this much CPU and GPU compute-power in one box.
    NVIDIA graphics card replacements? maybe eventually, but not at this writing.

  • New mac pro (2014) specs for production company help

    Hey guys new to the forum!
    I work for a production company that makes mainly online corporate video and motion graphics, lots of character animation, typography pieces and bits and pieces of 3D work with cinema 4d r14. We currently work on 2009 mac workstations which have the following specs:
    Model Name:          Mac Pro
    Model Identifier:          MacPro3,1
    Processor Name:          Quad-Core Intel Xeon
    Processor Speed:          3.2 GHz
    Number Of Processors:          2
    Total Number Of Cores:          8
    L2 Cache (per processor):          12 MB
    Memory:          16 GB
    Bus Speed:          1.6 GHz
    Chipset Model:          ATI Radeon HD 2600
    I've been asked to get some specs because we plan on buying the new mac pro and I have been reading some articles regarding performance with After Effects but in all honesty i really don't understand what sort of specs i need because i'm good at designing and animating but it when it comes to CPU, GPU talk it's all very confusing!
    My boss wants faster previews, faster render times and an all round better performance than what we have now, and with the possibility of outputting 4K in the near future i have to bear that in mind as well.
    If you guys could give me a helping hand choosing a new mac pro i would be eternally grateful!                         
    Thanks,
    Mark

    The new Mac Pros are, without a doubt, amazing machines. But are they value for money?
    A significant cost in these machines is the high end AMD GPUs, which is utilised very well by Apple in their own software like Final Cut Pro X, Compressor and Motion.  If you use those a lot, it's a no brainer. Place your order.
    Premiere Pro CC has  support for the GPUs (one GPU during playback, but can utilise both during renders.)
    There has been no pledge from Adobe for After Effects support. AE's ray-traced 3D render engine has been virtually abandoned by Adobe, so there will never be support for AMD CPUs for it. They are now more focussed on integration with Maxxon's Cinema 4D as a 3D alternative, but Cinema 4D exclusively renders with the CPU – no GPU benefit.
    The AE team are hinting about substantial multi-processing enhancements in the next major update, so it seems After Effects users will continue to be better off with faster multi-core CPUs, rather than expensive GPUs. With more CPU cores comes the need for more RAM.
    Some third party vendors of AE plugins, like VideoCopilot's Element 3D and Optical Flares, have pledged support for the Mac Pro GPUs. But the problem with intertwining CPU-dependent software with GPU-dependent plugins is you need to turn off multi-processing to get the best results, negating the value of your powerful Mac Pro CPU.
    Photoshop and Indesign rarely need the balls of a machine like the new Mac Pro. The new high-speed SSDs will certainly make them run faster than your average iMac, but it's not a HUGE leap for the cost difference.
    The benchmarks I've seen on media encoding for the new Mac Pros are a little underwhelming, to be honest. They're fast, yes, but not twice as fast as a $4000 iMac, despite a high-end machine being twice (or more) expensive.
    So, as a primarily Adobe user, I'm a bit torn. Personally, I think my money will be better spent buying a high-spec iMac for now. I can always on-sell it in 6 months if Adobe prove they are really coming to the party with Mac Pro support. But right now I'm not seeing proof of the benefits (from Adobe) in buying a $6K+ machine.
    If you are determined to buy the new Mac Pro, and After Effects and C4D are your primary tools, get the most powerful CPU you can afford, make sure you have at least 3-4GB of RAM for each CPU, and keep the lowest-specced GPUs.

  • New Mac Pro (2010) Configuration for Photoshop

    Multiple questions for this august body of knowledge holders...
    Consider the following problem statement:
    ---->> "To purchase a new Mac Pro as a *Photoshop / Aperture* rocket sled."
    Now the questions:
    1 Is the 6 core 3.33 GHz option the best CPU option? Can Photoshop make use of more (slower) cores?
    2 What about the video card? Stock card (ATI Radeon HD 5770) Or are there gains to be had springing for the upgrade (ATI Radeon HD 5870)?
    3 What about RAM - go for 24GB (8GB modules) or 32GB? Apple says limit is 16GB, aftermarket seems to think 32GB is limit (4GB vs 8GB modules) ( I've heard some say use only the first three RAM slots - the 3rd and 4th slot use the same bus and are therefore slower...true? )
    4 Last question: Storage. Who makes the most reliable hard (2TB) drive? Seagate? WD? Other?
    Thanks, in advance, to all those who provide brilliant advice!

    I think it depends on your needs as to what will be optimal.
    No to PS being very well threaded at all.
    So GHz rule. So do SSDs! and RAM helps as long as you work with large files.
    3 x 8GB is fine. Apple never lists the max RAM or drive capacity.
    $200 BTO for 5870 now rather than later.
    Hitachi, OWC SSD, WD.
    http://macperformanceguide.com/index_topics.html
    Even the 4-core 3.2GHz might do just fine and better $$ investment.
    Or this 3.33 2009 Special
    http://store.apple.com/us/product/G0G81LL/A?mco=MTcyMDg3MDQ
    http://twitter.com/diglloyd

  • New Mac Pro keeps looking for a server that isn't there

    So, I just got my new Mac Pro (Mountain Lion 10.8.2) the other day.  I used MIgration Asssisant to transfer most files from my old Power Mac G5.   Computers were connected thru a hub.
    Then I turned on file sharing on the old machine to get some other info transferred.  I then shut down file sharing, physically disconnecting the hub and connecting the new Mac Pro to my DSL modem with an ethernet cable.
    Now when I boot up the new machine, I get a message
    "There was a problem connecting to the server  'Joe Blow's Power Mac G5'.
    "The server may not exist or it is unavailable at this time.  Check the server name or IP address, check your network connection, and try again."
    I get this message three separate times ove a couple of minutes.
    Under the "Go" button in the Finder menu, I've clicked on  "Connect to server..." and cleared the old mac out of the list.
    What am I missing??
    Thanks

    Common causes of this issue include the following:
    Aliases in the iPhoto, iTunes, or iMovie library pointing to the server.
    Bookmarks in the Preview application.
    See iMovie Troubleshooting: Connection Failed, Server Does Not Exist
    Otherwise, proceed as below.
    Please read this whole message before doing anything. This procedure is a test, not a solution. Don’t be disappointed when you find that nothing has changed after you complete it. Step 1 The purpose of this step is to determine whether the problem is localized to your user account. Enable guest logins* and log in as Guest. For instructions, launch the System Preferences application, select Help from the menu bar, and enter “Set up guest users” (without the quotes) in the search box. Don't use the Safari-only “Guest User” login created by “Find My Mac.” While logged in as Guest, you won’t have access to any of your personal files or settings. Applications will behave as if you were running them for the first time. Don’t be alarmed by this; it’s normal. If you need any passwords or other personal data in order to complete the test, memorize, print, or write them down before you begin. Test while logged in as Guest. Same problem? After testing, log out of the guest account and, in your own account, disable it if you wish. Any files you created in the guest account will be deleted automatically when you log out of it. *Note: If you’ve activated “Find My Mac” or FileVault, then you can’t enable the Guest account. The “Guest User” login created by “Find My Mac” is not the same. Create a new account in which to test, and delete it, including its home folder, after testing. Step 2 The purpose of this step is to determine whether the problem is caused by third-party system modifications that load automatically at startup or login. Disconnect all wired peripherals except those needed for the test, and remove all aftermarket expansion cards. Boot in safe mode* and log in to the account with the problem. The instructions provided by Apple are as follows: 
    Shut down your computer, wait 30 seconds, and then hold down the shift key while pressing the power button.
    When you see the gray Apple logo, release the shift key.
    If you are prompted to log in, type your password, and then hold down the shift key again as you click Log in.
    Safe mode is much slower to boot and run than normal, and some things won’t work at all, including wireless networking on certain Macs.
    The login screen appears even if you usually log in automatically. You must know your login password in order to log in. If you’ve forgotten the password, you will need to reset it before you begin.
    *Note: If FileVault is enabled, or if a firmware password is set, or if the boot volume is a software RAID, you can’t boot in safe mode.
    Test while in safe mode. Same problem?
    After testing, reboot as usual (i.e., not in safe mode) and verify that you still have the problem. Post the results of steps 1 and 2.

  • New Mac Pro vs iMac for 3D/Gaming/Development

    I have a dilema
    I have been eagerly waiting to find out the specs of the New Mac Pro in order to purchase one for an all in one development machine but I can't quite make up my mind.
    I am a 3D Artist and a Programmer and a game player.   For 3D I use 3D Studio Max and VRay which is a realtime renderer (which I use to speed up visual workflow before rendering to the CPU) and this makes use of GPU Rendering, specifically CUDA but OpenCL is also supported in later versions,  Unfortunatly Shader Units on AMD cards seem to run at half the speed of NVidia CUDA cores from reading various sources on the web.  So thats a negative against the Mac Pro (Boot camped into windows of course)
    The programmer side of me writes iOS Apps and OSX apps so any Mac will do here.
    The gamer side of me plays cutting edge titles like the upcoming Call of Duty Ghosts.
    So, my choices are a fully maxed out 27" iMac with 1TB Flash drive, 32GB ram and the NVidia GTX 780M with its 4GB ram vs a D500 6 core Mac Pro with 512Gb PCI-e Flash storage + monitor
    I want to stay with Apple because I prefer their software and support (I wish Max was available on OSX!).
    Is it unlikely that the Mac Pro will offer a CUDA based graphic option like the iMac?  it doesnt have to be Quadro based as I find the 4GB GTX 7,8 series are fine for <5 million poly scenes and that with the multicore Mac Pro would make it a great choice for what I need.
    Thanks for any help
    Anim

    From a 3D Artist perspective, this review helped me understand quite a bit regarding the technology behind OpenCL with NVidia vs OpenCL with AMD and the New Mac Pro
    http://www.wired.co.uk/news/archive/2013-06/13/mac-pro-overview
    It seems my only options are to use an external thunderbolt enclosure with a GPU in it (e.g. a Titan) and hope it performs ok, plead with the Chaos Group to work on OpenCL with AMD (again) to make VRay support AMD or buy a PC and do what I want.  I will also need to get an iMac for iOS development but wont need the top end one if going this latter route,
    Thanks
    Anim

  • New Mac Pro now available for ordering

      Apple's website now shows the new Mac Pro is now available for ordering, and able to pick ip in store or shipped free..  And it's going to be built just a couple miles from my home in Austin.
    http://www.kvue.com/news/Mac-Pro-computers-to-be-assembled-in-Austin-236544411.h tml

    I'm just a few miles away also. The new Apple Campus construction is coming along well also. Flextronics is less then a mile away from the campus.

  • Do I need to deactivate my Creative Suite 6 before I pickup my new mac pro? or will the migration assistant do all of that?

    I am picking up my new mac pro tomorrow and wasn't sure if I needed to "deactivate" my Adobe products before I change over to my new Mac, or does the "migration assistant" do all the work?   thanks for any help.

    Nope. Migration does not work with any Adobe software. Don't even try it, it will cause a lot of huge problems.
    Deactivate your software on the old computer. Install it from the original installer on the new one, don't forget to install all upgrades which are available in the meantime.

  • HT2844 My front headphone jack does not work when connecting a head phone to a new mac pro desktop computer.  The sound still comes from the speakers.  Any solutions?

    The front headphone jack on my new mac pro desktop computer does not transmit sound when connecting a headphone or ear buds.  The sound still comes from the speakers and is not redirected to the head phone.  The port has never worked.  Any solutions?

    okay, try option-clicking on the speaker icon on the top of your screen. That should bring up a list of sound output options. including headphone. You could try messing around with Audio MIDI. It may be possible that the thing is still stuck inside the headphone jack. Careful use of a toothpick may get it unstuck. I dunno, I've never had a problem with the headphone jack. If all else fails, call Apple or take 'er in for an appointment
    JB

  • My brand new Mac Pro shuts down for no reason

    My two week old Mac Pro shut downs for no pparent reason. Using the wireless, not plug in to an outlet but battery fully charged. Both times happen within 15hrs. apart.

    Take it back to Apple and ask them to fix it.
    Allan

Maybe you are looking for