NI automotive Diagnostic Command Set and LV Real-Time

Hello world !!
I'd like to have some informations about the support of NI automotive Diagnostic Command Set under LV-RT.
Is the API fully supported ?
Is there a plan in the roadmap to support these tools with cRIO CAN modules ?
Thanks for your help.
Best regards,
Pierre R...
Certified LabVIEW Developer

Hello Dirk,
I just have a new question, I think the response is YES, but I prefer to confirm my mind.
Could you confirm that the ADCS permits us to fully implement the UDS standard in our LV RT apllication ?
Best regards,
Pierre R...
Certified LabVIEW Developer

Similar Messages

Automotive diagnostic command set and periodic messages on same can port - CVI

Hello everybody,
Is it possible, using Labwindows / CVI, to use NI AutomotiveDiagnostic Command Set to communicate with a MCU with KWP2000 protocol and simultaneously send periodic CAN messages on the SAME CAN interface (CAN0 or else ) and also using this port port to do some CCP communication ?
Thank for your support.

Hi,
I find myself also in this position. My current project only has LabVIEW 2009 and the ADCS from a few years back available to use.
We want to be able to:
- read in a CANDB file (.dbc) into the Channel API, to send general CAN messages (note you cannot use the Frame API to read in the dbc files unfortunately)
- using the same CAN interface, use the ADCS to perform diagnostics activities
Can you please elaborate on some of the hoops, and how long it might take? If its too much of a hack, a third CAN port might be the easier option.
Any light shed would be appreciated.
Christopher Farmer
Certified LabVIEW Architect
Certified TestStand Developer
http://wiredinsoftware.com.au

Automotive diagnostic command set Api DLL File

Hello,
I'm new in this Community and have just a simple question.
I've installed the NI Automotive Diagnostic Command Set and activated it online.
I need to some funktions in .NET Framework and therefore I need the NIdiagCS.dll but i can't find it. Can someone tell me where I can find this data?
Thanks for your help
Regards
Solved!
Go to Solution.

Should be installed in the Windows System folder

NI Automotive Diagnostic Command Set

I want to comunicate with ECU via cRio using NI Automotive Diagnostic Command Set but encounter with below error..
im using NI-XNET 1.7 and NI9862 c series module...
also what different between NI Automotive Diagnostic Command Set and ECU Measurement and Callibration Toolkit?
please advice the best method how to read data from ECU (CAN BUS - OBD ll)
thank you
Attachments:
Error_1.png ‏31 KB

How to install diagnostic command set via MAX. I have go through a forum. They said I need RIO I/O Scan to install diagnostic command set to cRIO. I already have this software but still unable to to install diagnostic command set to cRIO. Do you have other method to install diagnostic command set to cRIO?
Thank you.

Automotive diagnostic command set

Hello Everyone,
I started to use "Automotive Diagnostic Command Set" for LabView with NI USB CAN 8473 and I have a fundamental problem: I can not see the answers of the ECU.
The messages are properly sent and my ECU responds (see him with another tool that acts as a sniffer on the network), but are not able to review the responses of the ECU
What I'm doing wrong?
In attachment the screenshot of my very elementary project
thank you very much
monica
Solved!
Go to Solution.
Attachments:
DIAG.jpg ‏141 KB

Hello Monica,
You can check the example in Labview "Transmit Receive same port.vi"
I think it shows exactly what you would like to do.
Antonios
Attachments:
Transmit Receive same Port.vi ‏27 KB
Transmit Receive Same Port.txt ‏1 KB

Automotive Diagnostic Command Set & kwp2000 Read/Write Memory By Address

I used NI Automotive Diagnostic Command Set 1.0 Read/Write EEPEOM By Address of ECU base VW TP2.0 KWP2000 diagnostic protocol . I used NI example ReadWrite Memory.vi but not successful. I know must use below step.
Description
The usual procedure for getting a security access to the ECU is as follows:
Request a seed from the ECU using RequestSeed.vi with access mode = n.
From the seed, compute a key for the ECU on the host.
Send the key to the ECU using SendKey.vi with access mode = n + 1.
The security access is granted if the ECU validates the key sent. Otherwise, an error is returned.
Who has used NI Automotive Diagnostic Command Set 1.0 and know VW TP2.0 KWP2000 protocol. Please support some suggest and example VI.
Thanks

I modify NI example Read/Write Memory lool at attached files.
Now I know how to calculate the key and successful.But sometimes ok and sometimes no ok. The best luck is pass three error.
Attachments:
pho0.JPG ‏99 KB
ReadWrite ECU.vi ‏66 KB
seedaddkey.vi ‏12 KB

What do the NI Automotive Diagnostic Command Set & ECU Measurement software packages really bring?

I am looking at doing some CAN programming for the J1939 and J1708/1587 protocols. Would the NI Automotive Diagnostic Command Set & ECU Measurement software modules even be necessary?
What are the benefits of both modules?

Just for reference, look here for comments on the J1939 and J1708/1587 protocols.
The ECU Measurement and Calibration Toolkit provides a helpful API for interfacing and designing an ECU. In particular, it provides high-level, easy-to-use functions based on the Universal
Measurement and Calibration Protocol (XCP) and CAN Calibration Protocol
(CCP). A more detailed explanation of what is included and when it should be used can be found in Chapter 1 of the ECU Measurement and Calibration Toolkit User Manual.
Automotive Diagnostic Command Set
From the overview section of the product page: "NI ADCS is suitable for a range of automotive diagnostic applications
that typically involve reading and writing parameters, accessing
diagnostic trouble codes (DTCs), flashing ECU firmware, and initiating
ECU diagnostic test modes... ADCS benefits applications such as ECU firmware flashing tools, DTC
reading and logging, ECU diagnostic mode interfacing, and live
diagnostic variable monitoring and logging for on-road tests."
Hope this helps...
Peter Flores
Applications Engineer

Automotive diagnostic command toolset

Hi all! I am using LV 8.5.1 with the automotive diagnostic command toolset (ADCT). I have a couple of questions. Is it possible to change the transmitting CAN ID during a communication with an ECU device? How could one implant this with ADCT? In my case, I have to change the CAN ID, if my device is going to send a multi-frame message! (Changing from functional to physical addressing for the flow control frame)
Does ADCT support flow control frames for ISO 15765-5?
How can I use ADCT when I have two ECU's? I can only specify one receiving CAN ID!
Thx
BiPa

Hi,
The change of address IDs is not supported and actualy not mentioned within ISO 15765-2, which is implemented with our ADCS Toolkit.
It could be that I am missing something here. Could you send me some more details about what you would like to do. Please send me a EMail to [email protected]
For two ECUs you could just call the open diagnostics twice, but you have to use different Ids for both.
DirkW

Reading and saving real time data

Hi,
I would like to read and save real time data using DAQ card 6004 with my PDA device. There is no problem with reading real time data, I can see it on the PDA's screen successfully. But, when I'm trying to save this real time data, I have the following problem:
-It continuosly asks for file name.
-It only saves the data instaneously,i.e. it only saves the data at the moment.
I'm stuck with this problem, could you please help me? I attached my vi doc.
By the way, I'm using Labview PDA 8.5 version.
Attachments:
Acq&Graph&Save Voltage-Int Clk.vi ‏32 KB

oozdemir,
>> -It continuosly asks for file name.
You are prompting the user for a file name each time through the loop. Do this before you enter the loop and pass that file ref in.
>> -It only saves the data instaneously,i.e. it only saves the data at the moment.
By this, I am going to assume you want to append to the file as you go. Two problems, 1. you are saving an array to the file and additional info about the array structure is being saved. You would essentially be creating a binary file filled with array "records" (for lack of a better term) appended one after another. 2. If you want to append to the file, you will need to use the "Set File Position.vi" to locate the file pointer to the end of the file.
This task looks like it runs once per second until the stop button is pressed. You could build an array of all acquired data in the loop and then write it when the loop exits. Just a thought. This app could create a lot of data though.
-cb

Could I use two regular computer to achieve realtime communication using the Ethercat and Labview Real Time Module?

Could I use two regular computers (one acts master , another one acts as slave using the Ethercat Internet Card) to achieve realtime communication using the Ethercat and Labview Real Time Module? if it could, what hardware should I purchase from the NI ?
Thank you!

Hi Xiaolin,
NI doesn't offer Windows based Ethercat master or slave software. Only LabVIEW RT can run the Ethercat driver.
However, you could use a LabVIEW RT target as an Ethercat master and use the Ethercat Internet Card with a slave PC (note: I think this will work from the Beckhoff description of the card you are describing. The card should integrate like any other non-NI slave. However I haven't tested the setup and don't advise saying it will work until you have tried).
You can use any NI RT target with two ethernet ports as the Ethercat master. This could be a cRIO, PXI or RT Desktop.
Jesse Dennis
Design Engineer
Erdos Miller

What is the best way to store data on a network hard drive using CompactRIO RTOS and Labvew Real time?

HI!
I'm starting a project in which I have a low rate stream of data to read in a real time environment. I should store these data on a network hard disk without any PC with standard OS, I just have CompactRIO RTOS. How can I send this data to the network drive? Is it possible to just “write” data like I do for a standard file in LabView?
Thanks for any help!!
Il Conte
dr. Valentino Tontodonato

Il Conte,
you have to keep in mind that normally the RT OS does not map drives other than the Compact Flash that it has onboard (C:\). There are exceptions such as
-cFP-20xx which may have additional Flash Drives which can be addressed as D:\ Drive
-CVS systems with IEEE-1394 interface can write/read to Firewire external Harddrives
-PXI Controllers booted from a Floppy disk may map the floppy drive as A:\
One solution to your needings may be to write data to files locally on your onboard CompactFlash and then transfer these files to a network location using FTP, provided the network drive you are pointing to supports FTP.
Let us know if you need any more help with this,
AlessioD
National Instruments

BSP and Webdynpro real time questions

Hello gurus,
Can any one help me in proviiding me with the real time scenarios in BSP's and Webdynpro for ABAP.
i have just been trained on them but not really worked. If you all can also provide me with the interview questiosn it will be very helpful.
Thanks.

Hi Rao,
Wrong place to be looking for Interview questions my friend try google instead , if you are looking for some excercises than try this link Web Dynpro ABAP exercises from TechEd 2007 for ABAP Trial Version
Happy Learning,
Chaitanya.

LMS 2.1 and nGenius Real-Time Monitor 1.4

Dear NetPros,
Is the LMS 2.1 and the nGenius Real-Time Monitor 1.4 can be installed on the same system?
Regards,
Steve

Yes, but not recommended. Keeping them on separate servers will be more beneficial.

Should I use Standard C++ Containers and Stuff for games and other real time activities?

Hello,
I'm a C++ developer using VS 2012 and VS 2010 for developing AAA titles. I have read about not using STL and other stuff provided in the standard headers that come with VS. I read most of the stuff on the websites based on game programming and some
are really from the people well known in the industry. I have seen cases where they wont even use vector, list, map and others and not even use utility functions and algorithms. In such cases they write those containers and stuff themselves which has almost
the same interface and so much of debug and implementation time spent on such huge code.
I have two questions:
1: Isn't the C++ implementation that comes with VS optimized for the platform for better performance? Isn't it using some intrinsic functions that people on the client end doesn't know about and supplying their own implementation would indeed be
more slower in basic container operations such as insert, remove, find, swap, copy? Lets assume that we supply our own custom allocators for faster memory management to every container that we use. Also, they take care of fragmentation, alignment and stuff.
Why develop custom containers with almost same interface, why not spend that time on writing allocators and other stuff that might actually help?
2: There are times when we include a lot, a lot, of unnecessary stuff through the standard headers in a huge code base. Unnecessary, because we only needed a thing or two from such huge headers including other huge headers and so on. Now, I know templates
aren't instantiated unless used, same goes for the members functions inside them and blah blah. Since, these are precompiled headers, it is safe to assume that there is no compile time hit for that unnecessary stuff. My question is, is there any hidden effect
of such inclusions on code size (executable) that grows with the huge growth of the code base? In my opinion there shouldn't be, but I wanna know I'm not mistaken just in case.

Hi
I can tell you a story about one of our projects. We had to implement a block management system for harddisks (like the parts of file systems that allocate, free blocks and do the bookkeeping stuff). Now, one guy was convinced, that we should use the STL,
because it's easy to use and very well optimized and things like that. An other one said, that he would implement it by hand. So we decided to do both for a little test. The result was, that the hand implemented thing was much easier to write and much faster...
and the one using STL saw, that some classes were so slow, that he couldn't believe it... he then tryed to build some classes by hand and exchange them (e.g. array classes and stuff like that) and it was way faster than the STL and he wrote them in minutes
(!)... since then nobody wanted to use STL again... we don't even try it. It ended that we wrote our own string and array classes and stuff like that... easy little things that we understand. Now it's easy to use and fast and still flexible, because we know
what it's doing...
... but, that's just a story about our development and of course, we're often programming very close to the hardware and also using assembler languages often... so, I don't know what this tells us... you have to decide :-)
Rudolf

Waht is ticketing and some real time questions

hi abapers could u plz help me
1. in support/maintenance what is ticketing and types of ticketing
2. in supporting client directly send is issues to abapers or he send any others like TL, PL, PM .
3. is there any interface between client and developer
4. supporting only modification we can do or can we generate new reports also
5. in supporting we can modify reports and scripts only or bdc also we can modify
please give answers
thanks to advance

Hi,
Look at the Below 2 threads ...
Re: ticket
Re: tickets
Regards
Sudheer

NI automotive Diagnostic Command Set and LV Real-Time

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for