No accounting rule despite posting to general ledger ERP

Hi expert,
I create a securities transaction and faced this message in TBB1.
No accounting rule despite posting to general ledger ERP
Message no. TPM_TRAC1509
Am I miss somethings in configuration? Thanks for any support!

Hi tap nguyen,
You have to maintain accounting principle in SPRO - Corporate Finance Management - Transaction Manager - General Settings- Accounting - Organization - Assign Accounting Codes and Valuation Areas.
Regards
Gouse

Similar Messages

F.05 Posting for general ledger account .......[Error]

Hi expert,
I am running a transaction in F.05 and encounter several error messages such as:
1 Incorrect account determination: ABC 11111 >> No performance Assistant message
2 Enter account number with a maximum of 10 characters No performance Assistant message
3 Posting for general ledger account 11111 amount >>
Performance Assistant message prompt:
Posting for general ledger account 11111 amount 199,999.00 set in batch input
Message no. FR008
Diagnosis
In an evaluation that affects the financial statements, the posting for company code ABC and G/L amount 199,999.00 SGD, could not be carried out.
System Response
The posting is entered in a batch input session.
Procedure
Correct the error, for example, missing account determination, and run the batch input session. This ensures that the posting and the evaluation difference noted in the documents agree again.
Please advise.
Thank you!

1. Financial Accounting (New) > General Ledger Accounting (New) > Periodic Processing > Valuate > Foreign Currency Valuation.
Check your settings
2. Check if how you have defined you account groups in OBD4. Most probabaly you have defined 10 digit account length.
3. Check if the document type is relevent only for batch input.
Rgds
Harmees

Please help how to undo the post in general ledger?

dear all,,
please help me ?
we have R12 Orcale.
I made a post in general ledger for closing purpose ??
now I want to undo post whatever I posted should return back as it is ??
how I can do it ??
for more clarification
for closing the account period we went to the general ledger than post journal after that we select the period name than we select find ?
after find I made tick to all the transactions there than I posted ?
my question How I can cancel the post or undo and keep it as it is ??
please help

A posted journal batch can not be deleted, You can reverse it to nullify the accounting effects of the posted journal batch.
refer MOS note:
Can a Posted General Ledger Journal Entry be Deleted? [ID 135532.1]
regards,

Payment accounted in AP but not posted in General Ledger

Helloo everyone,
I have an issue.
Some Payments have been accounted in AP. However when querying the account in General ledger nothing is found.
As you can see from the above Accounting has been processed and GL date is 26 Feb 2015, However same information cannot be found in GL.
Grateful if anyone can pinpoint me to scripts or oracle docs to resolve this issue as it is impacting on the reconciliation process.

Hello,
Normal: the transfer to GL request was run on 05 Mar 15
Now, let us look for the corresponding Batch Name and Journal Entry Name in GL
Please, in the lines shown in print screen you posted, click the + (show) icon for cash accounting class:
Under General ledger header you should see Batch and Journal Entry Names:
If these values are populated in SLA, then search them directly in Enter Journals from (General Ledger Responsibility) and update this discussion
Thank you

General ledger account planning

Hi SAP Guru's
Can any body please hlep me out for General ledger accounting planning?
What is general ledger planning accounting?
Can any body explain with step by step configuration for the same?
Thank in advance
Amar

Hi,
Planning at GL level is possible from ECC 6.0
Check the link [GL Planning|http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_03/helpdata/EN/87/231ffdb4e9494ea529a99c23aa2a56/content.htm]
The config steps are very simple and is integrated with Microsoft Excel.
It is very handy and user friendly.
Regards,
Sridevi

Partial payment in General Ledger Open item

Anybody know how works partial payment in general ledger open item?
For example:
I post a General ledger open item for 100 usd document nº XXXX1 in a Bank account
Then enter incoming payment F-06 transaction, partial payment 50 USD
When i acces to F-06 for a new partial payment selecting by document nº XXXX1, zerop amount appear in field "Partially paid". SAP can't link original open item with partial payment for g/l open item.
For AP and AR open item, partial payment are linked to a original open item using REBZG field, but thsi field doen't exist in BSIS.
There are any way that for g/l open item can use partial payment (partially paid amount appaera correctly linked)?
Thanks. Best regards.

Hi Carlos,
When you do F-06 for the second time
select 2 documents
- nº XXXX1 and
- document posted first time with F-06
Hope it helps
May I know in what scenario, do you need partial payment for GL accounts ?
also try to consider the use of residual payment.
Regards
Sach!n

Entry View is not matching with General Ledger View in a document

Dear Experts
My problem is entry view is not matching with general ledger view because of profit center. I have posted the general ledger account with posting key 40 and profit center 1200 but when we see the same through general ledger view getting different profit center (i.e. 1410).
Offsetting general ledger account is compulsory ? if it is working for one general ledger account it should support other general ledger accounts also, but it is not the same in our scenario. Any customization level problem ?
Earliest help is needed.
Thanks - VG.

Hello VG,
In the general ledger view, the line items for the selected ledger are taken from a data merge between the document line items in the entry view and the document line items in the general ledger view. In the case of fields that exist in both views, the data in the general ledger view takes priority. However, fields are only transferred from the general ledger view to the fields in the entry view if they are active in the relevant ledger. If fields exist in the general ledger table group but are not active in the relevant ledger, they are transferred from the entry view. In the data merge, amounts in the entry view are in some cases (such as cash discounts) distributed proportionately across the amounts in the general ledger view. This is necessary if, as a result of document splitting, a line item in the entry view has been split into multiple line items in the general ledger view. The proportionately distributed amounts in the entry view cannot then be used for reconciliation with account balances because the total of the cash discount amounts from the line items, for example, does not correspond to the balance of the cash discount account as a result of the rounding differences.
Pls check this,
Rgds
Manish

Difference Between Special Purpose Ledger and New General Ledger

Dear All,
Could any boy explain me the difference between Special Purpose Ledger and New General Ledger?
Regards
JS

Hi
General Ledger Accounting (FI-GL) (New) The central task of G/L accounting is to provide a comprehensive picture of external accounting and accounts. Recording all business transactions (primary postings as well as settlements from internal accounting) in a software system that is fully integrated with all the other operational areas of a company ensures that the accounting data is always complete and accurate. Beyond fulfilling the legal requirements, General Ledger Accounting also fulfills other requirements for modern accounting: - Parallel Accounting General Ledger Accounting allows you to perform parallel accounting by managing several parallel ledgers for different accounting principles. - Integration of Legal and Management Reporting In General Ledger Accounting, you can perform internal management reporting in parallel with legal reporting. For this purpose, the Profit Center Accounting functions are integrated with General Ledger Accounting. Furthermore, you can generate financial statements for any dimension (such as profit center). - Segment Reporting General Ledger Accounting supports the segment reports required by the accounting principles IFRS (International Financial Reporting Standards) and US GAAP (Generally Accepted Accounting Principles). For this purpose, General Ledger Accounting contains the Segment dimension. - Cost of Sales Accounting You can perform cost of sales accounting in General Ledger Accounting. For this purpose, General Ledger Accounting contains the Functional Area dimension. Features General Ledger Accounting comprises the following functions for entering and evaluating posting data: - Choice between group level or company level - Automatic and simultaneous posting of all subledger items in the appropriate general ledger accounts (reconciliation accounts) - Simultaneous updating of the parallel general ledgers and of the cost accounting areas - Real-time evaluation of and reporting on current posting data, in the form of account displays, financial statements with different balance sheet versions, and additional analyses. In this way, General Ledger Accounting automatically serves as a complete record of all business transactions. It is the central and up-to-date component for reporting. Individual transactions can be checked at any time in real time by displaying the original documents, line items, and monthly debits and credits at various levels such as: - Account information - Journals - Totals/transaction figures - Balance sheet/profit and loss evaluations However, SAP still offers to choose between the New GL and the old Classic GL way of accounting. There are certain limitations in the new GL and clients are adopting to the new gl concept.
You also see the nsap note 756146
Regards
Roobal

Billing:Rules for posting key 01 and acct 621201 set incorrectly for"XREF3"

Hi Experts
At the time of billing i am getting the below error and its not posting into accounting
Rules for posting key 01 and acct 621201 set incorrectly for "XREF3" field
Message no. F5272
Diagnosis
One of the rules specifies that the field demands a required entry, the other rule says that the field is to be suppressed.
Procedure
Correct one of the two rules for the field selection.
You find the field status group in the G/L account master record:
Execute function
You can find the rules for the field status group in the Financial Accounting Implementation Guide in the activity Maintain field status variants.
You can find the posting key in the Financial Accounting Implementation Guide in the activity
Define posting key.
Regards
Selvi

Check this thread
[Re: Posting to GL |Re: Posting to GL]
thanks
G. Lakshmipathi

Bapi for posting FI documents for new General ledger accounting

Hi,
We have a requirement for posting FI documents for new General ledger i.e for transaction FB01L. Is there any BAPI for the same so that BDC can be avoided.
The BAPI "BAPI_ACC_DOCUMENT_POST" is used for FB01. Can we use it for FB01L?? As in this BAPI ledger group field is not there. Please suggest.
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Gaurav

Hi Sandra,
Solved myself using the below options.
If you are using the BAPI - BAPI_ACC_GL_POSTING_POST, you can pass accounting principle field in importing structure BAPIACHE08. The relation between Legder group & accounting principle has to be configured in SPRO by FICO consultant. Once they configured in the system, get the accounting principles and then pass the accounting principle .
Code: s_documentheader-acc_principle = wa_header-acc_principle.
Reward me if this will help you.
Thanks,
Yerukala Setty

General Ledger Posting Error (GLT2 051) No accounting transaction variant

Hello SAP Gurus-
When testing lockbox in FLB2, I received the following error message:
General Ledger Posting Error (GLT2 051) No accounting transaction variant assigned to FB01/ /LB
We are on ECC 6.0
I created a new Document Type LB
I created a new G/L account for Lockbox clearing and AR
How do I fix this?
Thank you!

Hi,
Assign a transaction variant for the document type you created in Transaction code GSP_VZ3. Also, make sure that the GL accounts affected are assigned with item categories in GSP_LZ2.
Thanks
Aravind

General Ledger Accounting (New): Line Items 0FIGL_O14 Performace issue

Dear Forum,
We are facing a performance issue while loading the data to 0FIGL_O14 General Ledger Accounting (New): Line Items from CUBE ZMMPRC01 -> ODSO 0FIGL_O14 DSO.
Please see my requirement below for updating the data to 0FIGL_O14 DSO.
This report is generated to display Dry Dock and Running Repair expenses for the particular Purchase orders with respective G/L's.
1) The G/L DSO will provide us the 0DEBIT_LC and    0DEB_CRE_DC Foreign currency amount with signs (+/-) amounts and.
2) ZMMPRC01 Cube   will provide us the 0ORDER_VALUE (Purchse order value)and    0INVCD_AMNT Invoice amount.
While we are loading the data from CUBE ZMMPRC01 -> ODSO 0FIGL_O14 DSO ,we have created nearly 19 InfoObject level routine to derive the below mentioned fields data for MM Purchase Order related records.
0CHRT_ACCTS    Chart of accounts
0ITEM_NUM      Number of line item within accounting documen
0AC_DOC_NO     Accounting document number
0GL_ACCOUNT    G/L Account
0COMP_CODE     Company code
0COSTCENTER    Cost Center
0CO_AREA       Controlling area
0COSTELMNT     Cost Element
0SEGMENT       Segment for Segmental Reporting
0BUS_AREA      Business area
0FUNC_AREA     Functional area
0AC_DOC_NR     Document Number (General Ledger View)
0AC_DOC_TYP    Document type
0POST_KEY      Posting key
0PSTNG_DATE    Posting date in the document
0DOC_CURRCY    Document currency
0LOC_CURTP2    Currency Type of Second Local Currency
0CALQUART1     Quarter
0CALYEAR       Calendar year
For reference Please see the below logic to derive the data for PO related record.
DATA:
      MONITOR_REC    TYPE rsmonitor.
$$ begin of routine - insert your code only below this line        -
    ... "insert your code here
    types : begin of ty_FIGL,
                CHRT_ACCTS type /BI0/OICHRT_ACCTS,
                ITEM_NUM type /BI0/OIITEM_NUM,
                AC_DOC_NO type /BI0/OIAC_DOC_NO,
                GL_ACCOUNT type /BI0/OIGL_ACCOUNT,
            end of ty_FIGL.
    data :it_figl type STANDARD TABLE OF ty_figl,
          wa_figl type ty_figl.
    SELECT single CHRT_ACCTS
                    ITEM_NUM
                    AC_DOC_NO
                    GL_ACCOUNT from /BI0/AFIGL_O1400
                      into wa_figl
                      where DOC_NUM = SOURCE_FIELDS-DOC_NUM and
                            DOC_ITEM = SOURCE_FIELDS-DOC_ITEM and
                            /BIC/Z_PCODE = SOURCE_FIELDS-/BIC/Z_PCODE
                            and
                            /BIC/Z_VOY_NO = SOURCE_FIELDS-/BIC/Z_VOY_NO
                            and
                            FISCYEAR = SOURCE_FIELDS-FISCYEAR.
    if sy-subrc = 0.
      RESULT = wa_figl-AC_DOC_NO.
    ENDIF.
    clear wa_figl.
Please note the same kind of logic is applied for all the above mentioned fields.
Here is my concerns and issue.
For the all above all routines i am referring BI0/AFIGL_O1400
DSO and finally loading to the Same DSO(BI0/AFIGL_O1400
The worried part is my DSO 0FIGL_O1400 is currecnly having nearly 60 Lacks records and MM cube is having nearly 55 requests which are required to update to the Above DSO for PO related PO value and Invoice amount.
The big issue here is while uploading data from MM cube to DSO say for example if the request is having 25,000 records from this nearly 500-600 records will be updated to DSO.
But here it is taking huge time ( nearly 3 days for request ) for updating these records , like this i have to pull 50 more requests from Cube to DSO as per the requirement.
Please note as of now i haven't created any indexes on DSO to improve this loads.
Please note am facing this issue in Production environment and need your help ASAP.
Thanks & Regards,
Srinivas Padugula

Hi,
If selecting data from 0FIGL_O14 is taking long time then you can create secondary indexes on DSO.
0FIGL_O14 would be huge as data volume directly corresponds to data volume in BSEG.
But for you requirement, I think what you can do is,
1. create multiprovider on top of DSO and Cube and create Bex report to give you the fields requried from both the infoproviders, you can then use open hub or APD approach to keep the data in the staging table or direct update DSO and then load the data to the DSO
2. Create secondary indexes on DSO so that fetching would be faster.
3. Do the enhancment at R/3 level to fetch fields from MM during load of G/L
Regards,
Pravin Karkhanis.

FAGLGA35 - Actual Distribution in New General Ledger accounting

Dears,
In transaction FAGLGA35, system gives below mentioned messages :-
i) No valid sender entries were found. Message no. GA710.
Diagnosis
The system did not find a valid sender for cycle 0LZAWL, segment AWL. The problem can be due to the following reasons:
Master data checking for cycle 0LZAWL, segment AWL, found no valid senders for this segment.
The senders are valid from a master data standpoint, but the system found no posted values or quantities in the database corresponding to your selection criteria. The sender and the segment will be processed only if the cycle works iteratively and at least one sender in another segment receives values which it can then allocate iteratively.
In cycles for indirect activity allocation, this message appears if segment AWL is to allocate posted sender activity quantities but the sender has been completely scheduled. Complete scheduling of posted activity quantities occurs, for example, if you use cycle AWL in a test run but already used it in a current real processing run in the system.
System Response
The system cannot process the segment.
Procedure
Check the definition of segment AWL in cycle 0LZAWL. In particular, check the validity of the sender master data for the settlement period.
To do so in cycle maintenance, choose "Formal check".
If segment AWL allocates posted values or quantities, the senders in the segment are valid only if:
The sender holds actually posted values/quantities not equal to 0
The cycle is iterative, and the sender receives values in another segment which it can then allocate iteratively.
If necessary, you must set the iteration indicator in cycle 0LZAWL.
In a cycle for indirect activity allocation, check whether the cycle is currently in use for posting in the system sender in segment AWL and thus completely schedules the senders in segment AWL.
If this is the case, cancel the cycle and repeat the cycle execution.
As per message solution, i do all the things but the same message comes.
ii) Cycle 0LZAWL, start date 20080401, does not include any senders.
Message no. GA749
Diagnosis
No senders were found for cycle 0LZAWL, starting date 20080401.
System Response
It is no longer possible to create receivers and assign senders for the segment.
Procedure
Check the definition of the cycle in the maintenance transaction for Actual Distribution: General Ledger. No valid sender cost centers could be found to match your selection.
If you use the sender rules "Posted amounts" or "Posted quantities", check whether records exist in the database for the criteria you entered (cost element, version...)
During indirect activity allocation with the sender rule "posted quantities", you should also note that only the difference between the planned/posted activity allocation and the scheduled activity quantity is allocated. If you entered activity types as sender, you should at this point also check the activity type category. For those quantities posted with an activity type of category 1 (manual entry, manual allocation) no indirect activity allocation is possible.
1. If this is an allocation in the FI/FI-SL area, the problem could also be due to the inheritance logic for FI-SL totals tables, whose "Inheritance of sender based on the receiver" indicator is activated in the "Partner object update" view (T811U-INHERSRC). These are tables that were installed before Release 4.6A.
Use transaction GCA8 to check this, and see the section on:
Inheritance Logic for Allocations
then correct the affected cycle, if required.
Is anybody have any solution. Please suggest it.
Regards,
Kalpik Shah

s_alr_87012168 : Customer Aging Report (Due Date Analysis for Open Items) this is a report generated.

Posting of CarryForward New general ledger

Hi financial wizards,
our client uses new general ledger. The accounting block has been extended with some ZZ user fields carrying results determined via substitution exits during posting.
The additional customer fields are added to the accounting block and are stored on item level (BSEG) as on aggregate level (FAGLFLEXT).
After the run of transaction FAGLGVTR - 'Balance Carryforward (New)' we have the correct values in the carryforward column of the target account, but values from customer fields are not transfered.
SAP will not help us with a note at this time; the features may be integrated in a later release.
Now my question: How to post the carryforward values manually or by program? I know the SAP Carryforward does not create any documents but after the run the Carryforward period (period 0 in former times) is filled with the sums of previous years P+L accounts. Carryforward works correct i.E. for profit center but not for the additional clients fields.
We need some good ideas as how to overcome this obstacle.
Regards,
Clemens

Dear Peter,
I am afraid that you are mistaken. There is lot of difference between the New GL Accounting and COPA. They are entirely different and its utility is also different.
Here in New Gl, Characteristics means, segment characteristics, for example, business area, profit center, functional area, segment.
Trust this answers your query!
Cheers,
Ashok SINGH

Reviewing General Ledger Accounts - No line item detail

I have just started with a new company using SAP Business One for the first time. My frustration is when reviewing the general ledger line items that there is no detail coming through that lets me see what the amounts relate to. No Description or Vendor Name. There is absolutely no way I can see if there are any posting errors to accounts unless I drill into each and every line item to see what it is. I have been into Form Settings but the fields required are not available options to select.
Every accounting system I have ever used has this standard feature - from off the shelf packages to customised SAP R/3.
I have spoken to the Implementation Company's Support Line and they have said that it would be a costly exercise to request a report that provides this information.
I can't accept that this is standard - why would anyone use the system????
I guess I just want to hear that this is not the norm with SAP Business One
Thanks

Try the General Ledger Report, there is a little more detail there - the BP Name is, I'm sure, included in that and you still get the drill down.
In the account balance screen, you can add the "Details" field which may give you more information as it usually contains the BP Code. It is not a difficult exercise for you support team to add a formatted search to populat that with the account name instead - it is a reasonably common customisation.

No accounting rule despite posting to general ledger ERP

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for