No commitment items selected

I use Fund Management and Material Ledger in ECC 6.0.
When I excute the post closing in the CKMLCP Edit Costing Run, and the system show a error message
No commitment items selected
Message no. FI606
I search the solution on SDN Community, and find someone said that "create a comittment item with Financial transaction: 40. Strange".
But I don't know where to create a committment item with Financial transaction: 40"
Could anyone tell me the IMG Path? thank you very much

Hi,
The issue has to do with the integration of Material Ledger with Funds Management.
Please refer to the note: 148967 Integration of material ledger to FM
It is recommended that any FM area would have at least one technical commitment item of each type of the following financial transactions: 40, 50, 60, 90 no matter how your FM area is customized.
It is known that each line item of each document posted in an integrated component should have an FM address (fund + funds center + commitment item) if FM is activated.
For some cases it is done automatically by searching for a valid FM address that is not relevant for FM update at the same time, thus having a commitment item ws fin.transaction 50, for example.
For ML documents, system is looking for a commitment item with FT 40 or 50, even if FM is not to be updated afterwards. Hence, please create at least one commitment item with Financial Transaction 50 and retest the situation.
Please check also the following:
-Make sure that you are working under any of the 4 Warehouse concepts supported by SAP. See note 700485.
-Check/apply (if missing) note 148967 Integration of material ledger to FM. As of this note, you should derive a commitment item with  financial transaction not equal to 30 nor 40 in ML postings
-Note 980168 FI 313 for commitment item with financial transaction <> 30  should be also implemented
Upon verification of the above, please activate trace for FMDERIVE (see note 666322) again and review your derivation.
Important:
Before creating any commitment item in FMCIA or consider any change in your customizing settings, please discuss with your Funds Mangement (PSM-FM) consultant.
Best Regards,
Vanessa.

Similar Messages

  • FI 606 No Commitment Item Selected during MB01

    Dear All,
    I have a problem during GR/IR process in MB01. When logistic section want to post the GR process based on the PO reference, there is an error: No commitment items selected, message FI606.
    I already created the commitment item with financial transaction 40, but it didn't affect anything during the GR. The error still the same.
    When I try to post the GR, I already activated the trace. There is a GL account for RAVE account derived to another commitment item which does not suitable with the derivation I already inputted in FMDERIVER.
    Why does it happen?
    Thanks

    Hi Aleksey,
    Thanks for your reply.
    I already set the fin. transaction for GR/IR account 40 and it didn't affect anything.
    And I already check the note 148967 and I'm confused how to implement the note.
    So the posted journal when GR saved:
    Dr. Inventory (GL: 141097200) --> budget, fin.transaction/CI category: 30/3
    Dr. RAVE Purchase (GL: 600504000) --> non budget, fin. transaction/CI category: 40/3
      Cr. AP GR/IR (GL: 300503000) --> non budget, fin. transaction/CI category: 40/3
    I activated the trace before post the GR. In the trace result, the commitment item derived only the inventory commitment item.
    Though, the GL appeared in the trace is GL RAVE Purchase (600504000), the commitment item derived is Inventory Commitment item (141097200).
    And I check the derivation GL to Commitment Item, the GL RAVE purchase is derived to RAVE Purchase commitment item.
    I dont know how it can be happen.
    Any solutions? Thanks

  • Error "FI 606 no commitment items selected" during Goods Receipt

    Hi,
    We use Fund Management and Material Ledger in ECC 6.0.
    Posting goods receipt for material with price control S (Standard price) were successful, but whenever we post goods receipt for material with price control V (Moving average price), the following error comes up:
    No commitment items selected
    Message no. FI606
    System Response
    No commitment items selected
    What might be the problem?
    The account assignment in MIGO view are already filled with fund center and commitment item number automatically
    We already assigned all that can be assigned in FMDERIVE (material to comm item, plant to comm item, gl to comm item, etc)
    We also already check OSS notes: 939545, 148967, 1312483, 164077
    Please help
    Thanks

    Hi,
    Try putting a trace on the FMDERIVE and see what the results are.
    Regards,
    Eli

  • Error in Posting Service Entry Sheet - FI 311 No Commitment Item in Item 1

    Dear All,
    We need a suggestion/solution for the following problem :-
    Our customer had raised purchase orders for services in may 2010. The following critical entries were made in the purchase order.
    Account Assignment Category was P-Project
    The WBS element was entered as the Accounts Assigment Category was P.
    The user was entering uncoded services. Hence the material group for that service which had G/L a/c tagged to it was entered. But the G/l code was not populated in the purchase order by the system at that time of creation of purchase order and subsequently the user was able to save and release purchase order.
    The user was able to post Service Entry Sheet and generate accounting entries in june 2010.
    Additional service entry sheets are required to be posted for the remaining quantites. The client has urcated the SES process into two parts.
    1. Through T-code ZML81N the end user is able to create and save the SES.
    2. Through T-code ML81N the Head of Department is able to approve and post the SES which results in generating of accounting entries.
    Presently the user is able to create SES with tcode ZML81N. But when the HOD tries to approve and post the ses we get the error.
    FI 311 - No commitement item maintained in Item 0001 in P220 (company code).
    Fund Management is active in this company code and all settings related to Funds Management and FI have been checked by respective consultants.
    The end user is not having any problems in processing SES for current Pos. But he is not able to create SES for the POs created in May, 2010 for which the user has already created and posted more than one SES against the same POs.
    We have already escalated it to SAP.
    Thanks in advance
    Anil Shanbhag

    Hi,
    Use T.code:FS00 and check G/L account 280000 is there in your company code or not.
    If yes, check its nature(type/description,control data , cretae bank/intererst tabs)of G/L
    NOTE: Also check and compare the field selection between Movement type 101 & your G/L account 280000 in SE38 t.code with  Program RM07CUFA
    Regards,
    Biju

  • Scheduling Agreement Item not reflected as commitment item in CO

    HI SAP MM Gurus,
    Good day!
    Here is my scenario:
    We need to create scheduling agreements with Account Assignment F which needs to have the commitment items reflected upon creation of the delivery schedule. This works ok if I create the documents (Scheduling Agreement and Delivery Schedule) manually, with the field EKPO-XOBLR being set to X to have the items pass through to CO
    The problem is, due to the volume of documents processed, we need to create an upload program using the function module BAPI_SAG_CREATE. Upon observation, this does not update the commitments for the shceduling agreement items even though both the scheduling agreement and delivery schedule were created.
    Any thoughts on how I can resolve this?
    Kind regards,
    DeLo

    Are u sure the transaction code is ME33L, contracts use ME33K
    Now this is tricky.
    One way of finding the condition table used is (working backwards)...
    go to table KONH
    in the field VAKEY enter your contract<i>(10 chars as in EKKO/EKPO w/ leading zeroes or trailing spaces)</i> and contract line<i>(5 chars w/ leading zeroes).</i>
    look at KVEWE (A in my case) and KOTABNR (16 in my case) used now join the two (A<b>0</b>16 add the zero in between) now this is the condition table.
    working forward.
    if the condition table is A016
    <b>Get A016-KNUMH from A016</b>
    <b>A016-KAPPL = 'M'
    A016-KSCHL = 'PB00' (condition you are looking for)
    A016-EVRTN = <u>Your Contract Number</u>
    A016-EVRTP = <u>Your Contract Line Number</u></b>
    Select DATAB <i>(Validity Start Date)</i>, DATBI <i>(Validity End Date)</i> from KONH
    where KNUMH EQ A016-KNUMH
    Cheers!
    Rishi

  • In PR GL a/c and commitment Item change

    Hi Guru,
    Whenever we select any GL code in PR, automatically system picks the
    relevant commitment no. & if we change the GL code, commitment no.
    doesn't get change. I think commitment no. should get change with the
    change of GL code. but in our system is allow me to change the GL a/c. in PR but the commitment item is not get updating.
    kinldy help me to resolve this issue.
    Regards,
    John pal

    Hi,
    Please, check note 658163; it has the explanation what you have to change.
    Regards,
    Eli

  • Commitment item not picking while MIRO posting for Service entry sheet

    Hi to all,
    We have activated Fund Management in middle of the year where there were purchase order completed to till MIGO. When we do MIRO now system unable to pick commitment item from FMDERIVE.
    We have created Commitment item as 50/3 combination ( No budget check ) and assigned to GR/IR clearing account.
    We also activated trace in FMDERIVE and checked MIRO  posting and found that derivation is working properly but while posting it is triggering error.
    Some one advise me as it affected daily activities.
    Thanks & Regards,
    Y.Kiran Babu

    Hi,
    For the purchase order completed and the related MIGO created before FM was implemented, you need to run FMCN and FMCT.
    I will explain to you in detail all the information related to the matter.
    First of all, it seems to be in your PO that does not have FM account assignment (funds center and commitment item) in account assignment TAB. In addition, the error occurs usually also because in your SES the FM account assignment is missing.
    For GR and IR documents FM always takes the major part of the FM account assignment from the PO.
    You can fill these account assignments by using the programs RFFMCHAN/RFFMCHAT.
    FMCN/FMCT must be run for the first document in the chain, which is the PO in case you don't have a PR assigned to this PO or an earmarked fund document. If you have PR's assigned to the PO's please run FMCN/FMCT for the PR first.
    When executing the FMCT transaction, ALL documents selected in one group must be tested and processed successfully TOGETHER. If any one document fails, the ENTIRE group is shown as in error.
    Therefore, first step is to ensure that the reference PO has a valid FM account assignment and is updated in FM. This should be done by FMCN/FMCT and subsequent posting with FMN4N (see reconstruction note 189761).
    The SES itself might not be changed by FMCT. Therefore you should fulfill the FM account assignments in SES manually or with a custom program.
    Please check also your table FM01X. As an alternative solution, you can enable one of these flags in table FM01X, depending on your business needs:
    FLG_PO_PROTECT if you want to always inherit the fm account assignment from the reference PO and therefore skip FMDERIVE
    FLG_FMDERIVE_FORCE if you always want to force a call to fmderive in all cases
    FLG_SES_OVERWRITE in services, if you wish to overwrite the account assignment from the SES with the derived values from FMDERIVE.
    You can find more information about it in text part of notes 1146677 and 923672.
    FMDERIVE is skipped for GR/IR lines and the Commitment item is inherited from the PO regardless of whether or not the GR/IR line is FM relevant. This is SAP standard behavior.
    If you want to force the Commitment item to be derived from the GL account for the GR/IR line, you can use the FLG_FMDERIVE_FORCE flag as described in note 923672.  This will allow FMDERIVE to be called for these lines.  Please be sure to fully test this to ensure that FM account assignments that you do not want to be overwritten are not incorrectly derived.
    Bear in mind that for PO´s that does not have account assignment you should run FMCN/FMCT + FMN4N. For this you would need to check the flags and which one is more related to your needs. With the appropriate flag marked in FM01X (active with X) you should be able to run the transactions without any issue.
    Based on note 189761, after doing all the previous suggestions and the issue does not appear anymore, I suggest you to run the following programs:
    1) FMN0 for this PO/GR to see if the actual values are correct in FM table FMIFIIT (FM actual line items).
    2) Run report RFFMRC04 (transaction FMAF). The reconstruction programs always update the totals records in Funds Management. Therefore, you do not normally need to reconstruct the totals records.  However, if you suspect there are data inconsistencies in the totals records, you can analyze and correct these using the report RFFMRC04 (transaction FMAF).
    If you correct the totals records, you must do this before you reconstruct the assigned values (see below).
    3) Run reconstruction for AVC
    You can also reconstruct the assigned values using the following tools:
        o  Report BPINDX03 (transaction FMBV) for former budgeting
        o  Report RFFMAVC_REINIT (transaction FMAVCREINIT) for the Budget
           Control System (BCS)
    Make sure that no other system activities (postings, budgeting) are carried out during a reconstruction (commitment/actual or assigned values).
    I believe that this resolve your inquiry.
    Best Regards,
    Vanessa.

  • "Error occurred in derivation rule" & "No commitment item entered in item".

    Unable to create Purchase Request (PR) and the following error message shows
    "Error occurred in derivation rule. See Long Text"
    Diagnosis
    Fund From Commitment Item
    No entry in a derivation rule was found for the specified source fields.
    The derivation rule was set up that an error message appears when this happens.
    The required derivation rule entry would need the following source fields:
    Commitment Item
    xxxxxxx
    Procedure:
    Create an entry in a derivation rule for these source field values.  Make sure that entries exist for all the valid source field values.  If the derivation should not always be carried out, you can also define rule so that no error message appears if a derivation rule entry does not exist.
    Can any one help how to find out the root cause of the error and solve this issue
    Regards,
    GB

    I was able to duplicate your error by creating the following.
    I went to transaction FMDERIVE and created a derivation rule and named it "Fund From Commitment Item".
    On the definition tab, I selected committment item (COMMIT_ITEM) for the source field and the target field selected (FUND).
    The condition tab was left blank. NOTE: On the attribute tab I selected the option "Issue Error Warning If No Value Found).
    I entered no rule values (F9) within the rule (for example such as commitment item XXXXXXX = fund YYYYY) and saved.
    After creating this derivation rule, I get the same error message because there were no values in the derivation rule (the source commitment item used was not found in the rule).
    If Fund is a field that is always keyed manually then I would not have such a derivation rule.
    But you may have some exceptions (like we do) and in the case of exceptions you can populate the derivation rule with those exceptions... i.e. whenever commitment item XXXX is used then the fund should be equal to YYYY further using your conditions and attributes for your custom needs.

  • MM-FM integration. How to stop update of Fund Center and Commitment Item

    Hello!
    Anyone please help. MM-FM integration.
    Our problem is after automatic creation of PR and PO from work orders, and the fund center and commitment item in the PR and PO has been changed/updated by the user, and then we change something in the work order and save it, the fund center and commitment item of the PR and PO goes back to default value (based on FMderive). Is there a way to stop this?
    Thanks in advance for your help.
    Regards,
    Rona

    It seems like you have selected "Do not overwrite target values" option in both Funds Enter and Commitment Item in the derivation rule defined.
    Go through SAP Note 666322, make sure the Trace feature in On and then choose the option "Overwrite Target Values" in both Funds Enter and Commitment Item in your derivation rule. After that, see the Difference before and after values in the trace log created after performing the derivation rule.
    I am sure this will help.
    Regards,
    Amar Lal

  • How can we change "Commitment item" to diplay mode in P.O?

    Hi,
    Our user want that the "Commitment item" field should be a in a display mode in Purchase Order in sap.
    Please suggest how can we do that.
    Thanks and Regards
    Nitin

    Hi Nitin,
    You can select the field status for your commitment item in transaction OME9.
    - Go to TCode OME9
    - Select the account assignment category that you are using
    - here you can do the SDRO (Suppress,display,required,optional) settings for your account assignment elements.
    Hope this helps.
    Thanks & Regards
    Anshu
    Edited by: Anshu Dixit on Dec 26, 2011 1:11 PM

  • Commitment Item in Stock Transport Order

    Hi,
        We are planning to carry out a intercompany sales using a stock transport PO.
    My problem is when a STO is created Account assignment tab in the item overview is not visible because of which i am not able to enter the commitment item for the material.
    I have tried activating the BADI : ME_COMMITMENT_STO_CH.
    I have used the sample coding given in the method.
    But still i face the same problem.
    How do we get this commitment item field in STO of is there some other way by which this issue can be handled.
    Thanks in Advance.

    Hi Arokianathan,
    I understand you are trying to put account assignment category like 'K' in transaction ME21N for creation of an intercompany STO.
    You have two choices 1) Use transaction ME21 (old) and not ME21N
    2) In transaction ME21N , use type of order as Return PO , this will remove the greying in the account assignment category field, you can now put in your value like K etc ... Afterwards  you have to goto tothe top and again select document type as Intercompany STO.
    Ones you fill in the material number and other details the account assignment tab page would automatically appear in the sub item level.
    Hope this helps..
    Regards
    Arnab Maitra

  • GR/IR Commitment Item

    Dear All,
    I created the Commitment itmen ( 40/3) for GR/IR  Account  and assigned to its master record. I have only dervivation FMDT_READ_MD_ACCOUNT_COMPANY Read Account Master Data for deriving the commitment item.
    When we post the GR, system is not deriving the Commitement item from GR/IR General ledeger , instaed taking the Commitment item from offsetting GL entry.
    please advise

    Thanks. Yes in FBL3N in  dynamic selection by giving  commitment item. User need reporting dr/cr of all GL against any  commitment item which are assinged to that GL's.
    e.g one commitmnet  is assign to many GL, they need sum of Dr/Cr against that commitment in particular period

  • Mass chnage Commitment Item in GL account FS00

    Hi,
      I wan to add commitment items for GL account  there are 1000 GL accounts for each 250  we have different commitment items  is it possible to do mass change  without BDC, can i use OB_GLACC12 but i have not found the filed commitment items for chnaging the parameters.
    regards,
    zafar
    Moderator: Use LSMW

    Hi,
    you can change Commitment item with each 250 GL a/C
    1 - use T.Code: MASS
    2 - Select Object Type     BUS3006 & Execute
    3 - Select G/L account master (company code) (SKB1) & Execute
    4 - Give Comp Code & GL from to number & Execute
    Here select commintment item field and change Mass Records
    If you required any help let us know.
    Or Create LSMW
    Regards
    Viswa
    Moderator: Points unassigned due to incorrect solution. If the user wants to assign different commitment item to G/L, MASS transaction is not efficient

  • How to do Commitment item carryforward (Fund Management) ?

    Dear experts,
    Please guide me how to do commitment item carryforward.
    I've read thought SAP help, it said I need to do commitment item carryforward.
    But I have no idea, what's the transaction code, what parameter to fill in..
    Kindly guide me or send me related document...please....
    [FM Newbie]

    T code : CJCF - Carry Forward Commitment
    Parameters: - Carrying Forward Commitments
    To carry forward a commitment to the first period of the following fiscal year, proceed as follows:
    Choose Accounting ® Controlling ® Cost Center Accounting ® Year-end closing ® Commitment carried forward.
    Enter the relevant cost center(s).
    Select or deselect the following indicators:
    Test run
    If you select Test run, the system carried forward the commitment, but does not update the results.
    Detail lists
    If you activate Detail list, the system displays the results of the commitment carried forward. The results list shows which values were carried forward.
    You should activate the Detail list together with the Test run. This ensures that you can check the results of the test run.
    Reversal
    The Reversal indicator controls whether data that has already been carried forward should be reversed again or not.
    If you have large amounts of data to process, it is advisable to execute the commitment carry-forward using background processing. This means you can process data at times of minimal system usage.
    Choose Program Execute in background.
    SAP help : - Year-End Closing Reports  
    The reports on year-end closing give you an overview of the closing operations (commitment carryforward and budget carryforward) with fiscal year change.
    The reports display totals records. A comparison of the line items transferred to the new fiscal year with the totals is possible using the program (RFFMCFRC) Year-End Closing Data: Totals Records on Line Items
    Features
    ·        Commitments and budget carried forward (RFFMEP1GX)
    This report displays commitment, budget for commitment and budget for a fiscal year that were carried forward to the following year.
    ·        Commitment carried forward in a test run (RFFMEP2GX)
    This report displays commitment belonging to a fiscal year that was carried forward to the following year in a a test run using the Commitment Carryforward
    ·        Preselected budget (RFFMEP3GX)
    This report displays budget for a fiscal year that was determined for the carryforward into the following year with the program RFFMCF25.

  • One Inventory GL to several Commitment Items

    Dear BCS experts
    Here is a requirement for capital Items. 
    1. All assets should go to Inventory GL while raising the PR/PO.
    2. While issuing the Goods(GI) it should go to respective Assets.
    Requirement is while raising the PR/PO, if I select the Blank Account Assignment category,  it will ask commitment item.
    If I do not assign any commitment item to the inventory GL, will the system allow me to overwrite  the commitment item for each line item for the same inventory GL? (manual entry).
    Ex: One Inv GL for Computers and accessories.
    Commitment items- Fax machines, computers, x-rox, printers..
    I would like to select different commitment items for the same computer Inv GL for consuming the Budget and controlling purpose.
    Can I do this without any other settings.
    Pls confirm
    Many Thanks
    Rama

    Hello,
    Does the FM derviation strategy & function module defined for GL to CI? Plus is the CI field compulsory in GL Master record?
    Is above are defined in that case, it would depend upon the derivation rule plus the setting whether overwrite is possible or not.
    Regards,
    Jaymin R. Bhatt

Maybe you are looking for

  • Help viewer does not work after update to 10.4.4

    Since updating to 10.4.4 my Help viewer does not work, and all of the troubleshooting fixes suggested in other threads have not had any success in resolving this. I've noted that when I go to Users>Library>Documentation>Help there is no mac.help file

  • I have a new PC and two iTune accounts, how can I add my ipod to my new pc

    I have an ipod nano that i would like to add to the same itune account as that of my iphone.  I need to put them all together.  How do I do this?

  • Question on Adobe Photoshop 5.0 for Mac

    I am using on my IMac (10.6.8 Snow Leopord) Aperture 3. I want to know  : 1. Can I download and use Abode Photoshop 5.0  Limited Edition  Windows / Mac  onto my IMac ? 2. Although this Abode program is ancient now, can it do certain things that Apert

  • How do I get removed from garage band community?

    When I started using garage band I signed up for the Apple Community. My mailbox is full of hundreds of posts from the community. The more I delete the more come in. I have rechecked all the settings for privacy. Can anyone help me stop the influx of

  • Function Module to read stack values.

    Hello, Is there is any function module to read the stack values. My requirement is I have 3 FM modules say FM_A, FM_B & FM_C. FM_A will call FM_C. FM_B will call FM_C. In FM_C, I need to identify whether the call has been made from FM_A or FM_B witho