No proper result for program

Hi All,
I am executing the following code but I'am not getting the Proper result.
Can anybody help me out..
SQL> ed
Wrote file afiedt.buf
1 declare
2 l_day varchar2(10);
3 begin
4 select to_char(sysdate,'DAY') into l_day from dual;
5   dbms_output.put_line ('Day '||l_day);
6   if l_day in ('SATURDAY','FRIDAY','THURSDAY','WEDNESDAY','SUNDAY') then
7      dbms_output.put_line ('Sysdate -14');
8   end if;
9   if l_day in ('TUESDAY') then
10      dbms_output.put_line ('Sysdate -14 and 15');
11   end if;
12    if l_day in ('MONDAY') then
13      dbms_output.put_line ('No data');
14   end if;
15* end;
SQL>
SQL> /
Day SATURDAY
PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.Why it not printing 'Sysdate -14'

Sid_ Z. wrote:
Hi All,
I am executing the following code but I'am not getting the Proper result.
Can anybody help me out..
SQL> ed
Wrote file afiedt.buf
1 declare
2 l_day varchar2(10);
3 begin
4 select to_char(sysdate,'DAY') into l_day from dual;
5   dbms_output.put_line ('Day '||l_day);
6   if l_day in ('SATURDAY','FRIDAY','THURSDAY','WEDNESDAY','SUNDAY') then
7      dbms_output.put_line ('Sysdate -14');
8   end if;
9   if l_day in ('TUESDAY') then
10      dbms_output.put_line ('Sysdate -14 and 15');
11   end if;
12    if l_day in ('MONDAY') then
13      dbms_output.put_line ('No data');
14   end if;
15* end;
SQL>
SQL> /
Day SATURDAY
PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.Why it not printing 'Sysdate -14'
1* select to_char(sysdate,'DAY') , length(to_char(sysdate,'DAY')) from dual
SQL> /
TO_CHAR(SYSDATE,'DAY')               LENGTH(TO_CHAR(SYSDATE,'DAY'))
FRIDAY                                          9

Similar Messages

Error in VSR result for program type

Hi Experts,
We are facing the error while running the Prog. Type Progression in student file. In student file we select tab program type progression --> in program type select gradute --> click on change progression result.
When we click on that we are getting this error:
1.Error@ 01ST0000 GR-4 Error in VSR result for program type GR and progression category 4@35\QLong text exists@
2.Error@ 01ST0000 GR-4 GR-<> is not available; choose a progress classification @5F\QNo long text exists@
wat can we do to resolve it.
Kind Regards,
Sudhanshu

Hi Sudhansu,
Check you config. It is customizing error. This Progress classification category is not valid for program type. Or this progress classification category does not exits.
Thanks,
Prabhat Singh

Not getting proper result for TIMESTAMP

While trying to run below query
SELECT GREATEST(TO_TIMESTAMP_TZ(CAST(NEW_TIME(TO_DATE('05/09/08
13:50','MM/DD/YY HH24:MI'),'CDT','GMT') AS TIMESTAMP)) ,
TO_TIMESTAMP_TZ(CAST(NEW_TIME(TO_DATE('06/09/08 13:50','MM/DD/YY
HH24:MI'),'CDT','GMT') AS TIMESTAMP)) )"DATE" FROM DUAL;
got the result as
"oracle.sql.TIMESTAMPTZ@8eaec8"
Where as should get some proper result.
I am using eclipse 3.2 . Do I need to do any more setup?

Your problem is almost definately how you retreive the timestamp from the ResultSet and then display it, not in the way the query returns it.

Exportto excel in tcode MCAF results in program termination for only 1 user

Hi,
The user is trying to export data from MCAF into a local file. This action results in program termination, its only for his user id. It works for all the user ids the basis guys had a look at it and they said everthing is ok on the authorization side. Im confused, please let me know...
Thanks,
Sukumar.

Thanks for the quick reply!!!
Error analysis
The system tried to access field "OE_OBJEKTTEXT" with type "C" and length
60 in the current program "RMCY9110 " using offset 71.
Partial field access is not allowed with an offset specification that is
larger than actual field length.
How to correct the error
Make the offset smaller with which you want to access the field.
If the error occurred in an ABAP program of your own or an SAP program
that you modified, try to correct it.
If the error occurred in a non-modified SAP program, you may be
able to find a solution in the SAP note system.
If you have access to the note system yourself, use the following
search criteria:
"DATA_OFFSET_TOO_LARGE"
"RMCY9110 " bzw. "RMCS0F0O "
"OBJEKTTEXT_ERMITTELN"
Thanks,
Sukumar.

Highly frustrated with Outlook 2013 Search People box bugs - Multiple Name Results for Same Contact & Inconsistent Results

The Outlook 2013 "Search People" box does not function properly. It frequently displays incorrect results or a mess of duplicate results. I've reported previous issues about this and consolidating my posts into one (with screenshots this
time). Hopefully this message will be forwarded to or seen by the Outlook programmers. It really needs to be fixed.
Outlook 2010 and other prior versions worked perfectly. You search for name, you get ONE result with the info you're looking for. FAST AND EASY. But with Outlook 2013 Microsoft has created a heck of a mess resulting in huge frustration and productivity loss
with such simple but important tasks.
I have hundreds of contacts stored in my Outlook address book, and they all have COMPLETE contact info added.
One major issue that I'm experiencing in the new Outlook 2013 is that I now get average of 4 or more duplicate name results appearing for the same contact. And each result contains different and incomplete contact info, making it impossible for me to quickly
find the basic info I'm looking for. The cause of this issue is that Outlook 2013 now provides results from not only your local address book(s), but it also shows results based on your email history and social media accounts setup.
And there's no way to turn this off, or at least specify what folders and/or accounts the People Search box should use.
To make matters worse, the Microsoft developers conveniently forgot to add some form of an indicator (like a small icon besides each name result in the list) that clearly indicates what result is from what source. So you must manually click on each
result one at a time and repeat the search until you locate the correct one.
For one specific example, I have a contact stored in my local address book called
Infusionsoft. When I type "Infusionsoft" in the People Search box to quickly find a phone number, Outlook 2013 shows me 7 results with the same name. See the screenshot below:
As you can see in the screenshot above, every result just says "Infusionsoft", so I have to manually click on each name result one at a time and repeat the process until I find the correct one from my address book. This same thing happens with other
random contacts.
From what I can tell, Outlook is pulling results based on based on recent emails I've received from different people with "@infusionsoft.com" in their email address. So the first result shows "[email protected]" (just the email
address), the second result shows "[email protected]", the third result shows "[email protected]" and so forth. I don't want Outlook to show all of that. I just want what's in my address book!
And you would think that the last result would be the correct one from my address book, but no. Sometimes its the 5th result, and other times it's the 3rd or 7th result. So there's no freaking order of things here.
We simply need the ability to turn off searching of email history and other accounts when using the People Search box. Problem fixed.
(And please don't tell me that I need to "link" every incorrect result to one main contact. You shouldn't expect everyone to have to tediously link any and all results that appear to a record. ESPECIALLY when 5+ results for each contact appear regularly.)
ISSUE 2: Some names must be typed in a different way for the Search People to locate them
Another big issue I'm having with the Search People box is that some name searches don’t show the correct result, unless I search for their names in a different way.
For one specific example, I have a contact stored in my address book named "Dave Johnson". When I type "Dave Johnson" in the Search People box, one result appears, but it's just his email address, only. It's not the result that's stored in my Outlook address
book with his phone number, addresses, etc. Screen shot below:
If I type in Dave's name reverse order (Johnson Dave), no results are found at all.
Now if I just type in just"Johnson" all by itself, it finds Dave's correct result (the one stored in my Outlook Address Book). Along with everybody else that has "Johnson" in their name (see screenshot below)...
I double-checked how I have Dave's name programed in my address book, and it's in there as "Dave Johnson" for both the Full Name and File As fields.
Also, the name order shouldn't make any difference when using the People Search Box anyway. Sometimes I can find people by Last Name, First Name or First Name, Last Name. Only with random contacts does it get difficult finding their info and
I have to do strange things like this to find them from the People Search box.
ISSUE 3: Some Search People results only yield an email address only.
For other random contacts, some search results only yield an email address with no other contact details. But I can open the persons contact card from the address book manually, with the same email address shown! Screenshot below...
In the screenshot above, I have outlined the Search People box results in red, and the Address Book results in green. You can clearly see that "Robert White" is a contact stored in my local address book with full contact details, but the Search People result
only shows his email address! Again, it's not consitent. It's hit or miss with different people.
ISSUE 4: Some results just don't appear at all, but they are in the address book
Another issue I'm experiencing with the People Search Box is that some people simply cannot be found. But I can see their contact info just fine if I click on the "People" tab down at the bottom of the page and type in their name in the "Search Contacts"
field. Why can't the People Search box find certain people? I opened up their contact details and cannot find a single thing that would prevent them from showing up in results.
These are clearly serious bugs that need to be fixed. And I'm shocked as to how this got missed--or ignored during alpha and beta testing. I see the "idea" behind the developers having the Search People box search everything outside of the
address book, but in real world application this causes a heck of a lot of problems & confusion, and it needs to be fixed ASAP.
For technical details, I have Outlook 2013 running on two computers using hosted Exchange 2010. One system is Windows 7 and other is Windows 8. The same problems occur on BOTH computers. As far as my Outlook account setup, I have all contacts stored in the
main address book (no sub-folders or other folders).
Can someone help communicate this message to the Outlook developers??? The "Frown" button limits me to 100 characters and one image. There's no way I can communicate this level of detail and steps to duplicate in 100 characters!

Thanks for your reply.
1) The instant search boxes in each individual page work just fine. If I am on the People page and type in a name in the "Search Contacts" field, it searches my contacts and displays the results that I want. But I should not have to leave whatever screen
I'm in to find people now. In Outlook 2010 and earlier versions, I could be on the calendar page and then search for a contact without clicking off the calendar completely. For productivity-sake, it's a huge waste of time and hassle now.
2) I'm familiar with how contact linking works, and quite frankly it's a huge mess in general. I NEVER create multiple contacts for the same person. I get that Outlook 2013 get confused now when it detects a LinkedIn or Facebook account for the same person
already in my Outlook address book, but we need to have options that allow us to turn off results from some or all social networks. This is a big part of the problem.
Think about it this way - The average person has 150+ LinkedIn connections, and more for Facebook. Many people today have accounts for both and they are setup with the same email address. When Outlook 2013 has to scan all the networks IN ADDITION to your
local address book(s), it's a no brainer that it can get very confused trying to display results.
Another big part of the problem is that Outlooks new search system also scans your email history. I receive emails from people who use multiple email addresses, or emails from companies with multiple reps or ticket systems that send you a unique
ticket ID # ending in the same email address domain. Now Outlook displays people search results based on everything under the sun in my email history. This is beyond frustrating (see my "Infusionsoft" screenshot above in the first post).
Again, I want to stress that for the search examples I referenced, I only have one entry in my Outlook address book for each person. And that's all I want to find when I search for people--what's already in my own address book!
In summary:
We need an OPTION to turn off searching external networks when using the People Search box
We need an option to tell Outlook to not scan email history for people search results (I think this needs to be disabled entirely actually. It's not helpful at all)
There should be a fixed priority for displaying people search results, with local address book results FIRST, followed by social network results.
There should be a clear icon/indicator next to each result that gives you a clue as to where the result is coming from. Your address book? Facebook? LinkedIn? We should not need to click on each result to get a hint as to where it's coming from.
Work out the bugs in general with the new search system.
One other thing that I didn't mention is that the Search People box also shows results for people I'm not even "friends" or connected with on the different social networks. But I've noticed that some people use the same email address for those networks that
I already have programmed for them in my address book, which is why Outlook sometimes shows me these results. Does that make sense?
I'll try rebuilding the index, but after testing Outlook 2013 on 3 different machines so far and seeing the same results (all slightly different results on each machine and very inconsistent), I doubt this will address the issue.

P/L A/c for a single day gives different results for different users

Hi!
     We have SAP B1 8.81 (PL 09) in our office. P/L Account for a particular date gives different value for a single account (Other Income Account) for one user and a consistent value for all other users. The user in question is a super user and does not seem to pick a specific entry posted in the Other Income Account for that day thus giving erroneous result. I have checked the Trial Balance for that day and it gives proper result. Only the P/L account gives erroneous data. Could anyone help with the reason for this.
Thanks
Sreekumar

Hi Jitin,
          Thanks for your reply.
          I tried the way you mentioned. However, the result is the same.
          The entry that I'm talking about is an automatic journal entry posted through the Outgoing Payment option.
          To make it more clear, an outgoing payment to a vendor was posted on 05/19/11 for 1,42,178.32. The check was drawn only for 71,089.16 which was the correct amount and the remaining amount (71,089.16) got posted in the Other Income account. The P/L account for this date is not picking the amount of 71,089.16 in the Other Income Account.
Thanks & Regards
Sreekumar
Edited by: Sreekumar on Jan 31, 2012 5:58 PM

Test exact exception messages in java SE with locale for program handling

My problem is test the exact exceptions returned by JAVA Standard Engine for program handling.
I work in systems usually set to "Italian Locale" and the result is different in different platforms.
When I work in MSWindows with Java almost messages are in English but not all, for example IOException "Cannot assign requested address" in the Italian Locale is "Indirizzo richiesto non valido nel proprio contesto" but other messages like "Socket Closed" remain "Socket Closed".
Catch the exact exception through description is not a good idea but I don't found other way for Java SE native exceptions!
In Solaris I try to set English LANG environment in the user context and it works.
In MS Windows I try to set the definition in start java with:
*"java -Duser.language=en -Duser.region=US"*
and in the code I try to add the statement:
Locale.setDefault(Locale.US);
but without results.
Is there anybody that has the same problem?
Is there a better way to catch the exact type of Java SE exceptions ?
My test Environments:_
Solaris 10 jdk 1.6.0.02
MS Windows 2000 jdk 1.6.0.02
MS Windows XP jdk1.6.0.02 and 1.5.0.12
Fragment program example for additional explanation:_
try {
} catch (IOException ex) {
if (ex.getMessage().equals("Socket Closed"))
System.out.println("Ok socket closed exception catched");
if (ex.getMessage().equals("Cannot assign requested address"))
System.out.println("Ok assign requested address exception catched");
}

My problem is test the exact exceptions returned by JAVA Standard Engine for program handling.
I work in systems usually set to "Italian Locale" and the result is different in different platforms.
When I work in MSWindows with Java almost messages are in English but not all, for example IOException "Cannot assign requested address" in the Italian Locale is "Indirizzo richiesto non valido nel proprio contesto" but other messages like "Socket Closed" remain "Socket Closed".
Catch the exact exception through description is not a good idea but I don't found other way for Java SE native exceptions!
In Solaris I try to set English LANG environment in the user context and it works.
In MS Windows I try to set the definition in start java with:
*"java -Duser.language=en -Duser.region=US"*
and in the code I try to add the statement:
Locale.setDefault(Locale.US);
but without results.
Is there anybody that has the same problem?
Is there a better way to catch the exact type of Java SE exceptions ?
My test Environments:_
Solaris 10 jdk 1.6.0.02
MS Windows 2000 jdk 1.6.0.02
MS Windows XP jdk1.6.0.02 and 1.5.0.12
Fragment program example for additional explanation:_
try {
} catch (IOException ex) {
if (ex.getMessage().equals("Socket Closed"))
System.out.println("Ok socket closed exception catched");
if (ex.getMessage().equals("Cannot assign requested address"))
System.out.println("Ok assign requested address exception catched");
}

Spotlight is gray instead of blue and won't return proper results

Hello,
I have been having difficulty with Spotlight for 2 months now. One day, it just stopped returning any results. So I reindexed the entire hard drive, checked via Terminal to make sure indexing was on and followed a bevy of other tricks found in discussions. None of them has worked. At the moment, Spotlight will return some results such as applications, but skips most of the documents that should turn up easily.
Also affected is the search in the Mail application. It will return proper results if I search via the FROM or TO or SUBJECT fields, but it will not return ANY results if I choose the ENTIRE MESSAGE search choice. Subsequently, mail messages do not appear in the Spotlight search either (even though it is checked in the Preferences.
Also, I know that the spotlight menu will be colored blue when the drive is indexed properly. Mine is gray, even though it took it's 2 hours to index and said it successfully completed.
I've yet to find a solution that works and am looking for any advice, tips, or solution trials.
Thanks,
jc

Start with http://www.pinkmutant.com/articles/Leopard/leospot.html and my mod to Finder's Find at http://discussions.apple.com/message.jspa?messageID=6725932 for what you can change so you can find stuff.

Proper support for Fuji EXR Raw Files

There is still no proper support for Fuji EXR Raw files. On any Fuji X-series camera, the in-camera raw processing, including specifying options always outputs a far superior image that Adobe Camera Raw 6. I've been using an X100 for some time now, and have really gathered some great images with it. But Adobe Camera Raw fails miserably to understand how to process these files.
This is more of a complaint and feature request than a question, because I already know the answer. Adobe has not worked close enough, or at all, with Fuji to develop a Raw processor for the EXR pixel layout.
The EXR pixel arrangement offers new possibilities, especially the ability to take an HDR image of a moving subject, and without a tripod. The elimination of the low-pass filter allows for more sharpness, and finally the noise pattern is much more "film-like".
I've been using Adobe Photoshop for processing images for years, but have no compelling reason to upgrade without a proper conversion for Fuji RAW files.
Adobe: Please work with Fuji to bring world-class support for EXR Raw images.
Thank you,
William

Good day!
Adobe has not worked close enough, or at all, with Fuji to develop a Raw processor for the EXR pixel layout.
There seems to be a reason why Adobe has to reverse engineer RAW formats – the camera manufacturers don’t want their customers to use Adobe (and other) software to process their RAW files. (If their proprietary software gets better results then that’s understandable, but for how long are they going to support their own software?)
Now maybe Fuji is more cooperative than others, but do you know that for certain?
I've been using Adobe Photoshop for processing images for years, but have no compelling reason to upgrade without a proper conversion for Fuji RAW files.
If the new/improved features of Photoshop CS6 have no significance for the way you process, manage, edit and touch-up photographs feel free to stick with whatever version of Photoshop you use currently, but be aware that hardware/OS changes on your side may some day make that version inoperable on your set-up.
Also the upgrade path has been cut down to one version, if I understand correctly.
Anyway, this is a beginners Forum, feature requests might be better posted over at
http://feedback.photoshop.com/photoshop_family
Regards,
Pfaffenbichler

HT6065 When do we get a proper fix for the Mail App?

When do we get a proper fix for the Mail app on my iMac? The last one made things worse. Or ta least, how can I roll back the OS to Mountain Lion?

Thanks for the reply Varjak,
Mail has stopped refreshing as it should. When I click the get new mail envelope, there used to be a sound after around five seconds if there were no new notifications. When I try that now the program just hangs. When I look at 'Force Quit', which incidentally I have to open another app or Finder window in order to access because Mail freezes totally, including the Apple menu, it says that Mail isn't responding. The Mac won't shut down sometimes because Mail won't quit. If I manage to open a mail and then go to another inbox, the whole thing is liable to hang. Using Apple help just before Christmas I cleared out the old cache that M.Lion left behind and now there isn't a cache for Mail.
We are on Tiscali Broadband through a multi-port router and usually getting around 11Mb download speeds. My mail addresses are either tiscali.co.uk or gmail. It will not successfully send group mails either, despite the upgrade before Christmas. I never had a problem with M.L. and Mail. From looking at the Forums it seems I am not alone here. I also have a windows pc and an iPhone and they both access my mail addresses without any problem.
Cheers,
Cybermouse

Firefox.exe-application error: Found 0 results for the instruction at "0x00b48d37" reference memory at "0x00bd37". the memory could not be "read".

my firefox does not work because of this error.
firefox.exe-application error: Found 0 results for the instruction at "0x00b48d37" reference memory at "0x00bd37". the memory could not be "read".

Do a clean (re)install and delete the Firefox program folder (C:\Program Files\Mozilla Firefox\).
Download a fresh Firefox copy and save the file to the desktop.
* Firefox 8.0.x: http://www.mozilla.com/en-US/firefox/all.html
Uninstall your current Firefox version if possible.
*Do NOT remove personal data when you uninstall the current version or you lose your bookmarks and other data in the profile folder.
Remove the Firefox program folder before installing that newly downloaded copy of the Firefox installer.
*It is important to delete the Firefox program folder to remove all the files and make sure that there are no problems with files that were leftover after uninstalling.
Your bookmarks and other profile data are stored elsewhere in the Firefox Profile Folder and won't be affected by a reinstall, but make sure that you do not select to remove personal data if you uninstall Firefox.
*http://kb.mozillazine.org/Profile_folder_-_Firefox
*http://kb.mozillazine.org/Profile_backup
See also:
*http://kb.mozillazine.org/Standard_diagnostic_-_Firefox#Clean_reinstall

Batch Characteristic not updating with result for linked MIC

Hi,
I have created a MIC and linked to a batch characteristic i.e. potency and included the characteristic in a specific batch class. This MIC is part of the inspection plan for a certain material.
If I generate a lot of origin 01 and 09 for the material and record a result for the MIC and apply a UD, the batch characteristic is not updated with the result recorded in the batch master record..
If I generate a lot origin 89 for the same material, when the result is recorded for the MIC and apply a UD the batch characteristic is updated with the mic value in the batch master record.
Can you help regards?

Ok. I am a little bit further.
I put a trace (ST05) on the result recording and I find a difference between 4.7 and ECC6.0.
In ECC6.0 I've an deletion in table "AUSP". This deletion isn't performed in the 4.7 system.
Hope that this can help to solve my problem.
Regards,
René
@ Mayank
Above, all the master data and customizing is mentioned to transfer the result to the batch classification
Edited by: Rene Fuhner on Jul 30, 2010 7:03 PM

I need the proper settings for Acrobate Reader 9.3 to be backward compatable to open PDF 6.0.

I have a full license for Adobe Acrobat Professional 9. I just got off the phone with Acrobat technical support about once you install Acrobat Reader 9 to read documents online using Internet Explorer and Firefox. That it would make documents that were scanned in with CapturePerfect3.0 and a Cannon document scanner using Adobe Acrobat Professional 6.0 saved in PDF format and stored as images with records stored with Access Database front-end and SQL Server backend. Simple 6.0 PDF documents stored scanned documents in a database. O.K.! The problem is once you upgrade to read newer version of Acrobat PDF documents that our staff must read online, it makes reading saved database 6.0 PDF documents unreadable. Technical support informs me that it is a settings fix in Acrobat Reader 9 but because the Acrobat Reader 9 is a free download that can't tell me how to fix the settings.
So here I am trying to find out the proper settings in Acrobat Reader 9 to read new Acrobat documents online and old 6.0 Acrobat PDF documents on Windows XP Pro workstations and one Windows 7 workstation of the CEO's assistant. So please help me with the proper setting for Acrobat Reader 9 to work online reading newer PDF documents and still read Acrobat 6.0 documents stored in a database.

Adobe Reader 9 can open old and new pdf files.

Found 0 results for When I open Firefox I get a "Well this is embarrassing" message. Makes no difference if I click on "Start a new session" or "Restore", it crashes. Then I get a "crash report" which apparently goes nowhere. I have uninstalled and reinst

Found 0 results for When I open Firefox I get a "Well this is embarrassing" message. Makes no difference if I click on "Start a new session" or "Restore", it crashes. Then I get a "crash report" which apparently goes nowhere. I have uninstalled and reinstalled twice with the same result, what do I do to restore Firefox?
== This happened ==
Every time Firefox opened
== Last week when I opened Firefox.

The crash reporter doesn't appear to be working...Here are the details that were contained in the report:
Add-ons: {0538E3E3-7E9B-4d49-8831-A227C80A7AD3}:0.9.10.2, :3.63,{972ce4c6-7e08-4474-a285-3208198ce6fd}:3.6.3
BuildID: 20100401064631
Comments: I get an error message, " well, this is embarrassing"..and Firefox crashes
CrashTime: 1274739017
EMCheckCompatibility: true
Email: [email protected]
FramePoisonBase: 00000000f0dea000
FramePoisonSize: 4096
InstallTime: 1270304892
ProductName: Firefox
ReleaseChannel: release
SecondsSinceLastCrash: 2699
StartupTime: 1274738966
Theme: classic/1.0
Throttleable: 1
Vendor: Mozilla
Version: 3.6.3
This report also contains technical information about the state of the application when it crashed.

Error in background job for program RSGET_SMSY error message No active job

Hello!
I would like to set up the Change Request Management functionality in SAP Solution Manager.
The only red warning by executing Test-button in Tcode SOLAR_ADMIN_PROJECT is:
<b>Error in background job for program RSGET_SMSY error message No active job found</b>
Can someone please tell me how to solve this problem?
(tcodes, technical steps)
Thank you very much!
regards
Thom

Thank you very much!
Can you also help me with the warning "Errors occurred during synchronization of the system landscape" in tcode SOLAR_PROJECT_ADMIN" --> System landscape --> Change requests --> "Refresh"?
The second issue I cannot see any projects in Tcode "/TMWFLOW/CMSCONF"
according to the SPRO-step "Set Project Assignment of Requests as Mandatory"
Thank you!
regards

No proper result for program

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for