No scientific notation in csv file

Hi, All
I have a package is extracting data from DB to CSV file.
And I made up a column like '48484848484848484', when I load this column into CSV file,
it shows me scientific notation along with the data.
How can I get rid of the scientific notation ?
I've tried data conversion, derived column. Nothing works.
This really makes my frustrated.
Thank you in advance.

Hi,
In that case, the SQL export process is fine.
It's just Excel suggesting a scientific notation where it's not needed.
You can get rid of the scientific notation by forcing your "long" numeric value into a string.
For example
"A001","Item code", "123376265892759026"
instead of
"A001", "Item code", 123376265892759026
Sebastian Sajaroff Senior DBA Pharmacies Jean Coutu
My data souce is like:
Select '1234567891123' as column1,
          Id  as column2,
                      Name as column3,
From Table1
I think I already give column1 as a string. And I also tried to cast column1 to nvarchar or varchar or decimal or numeric, nothing works.

Similar Messages

  • Prevent large numbers from becoming scientific notation on CSV import

    Hi, I'm importing contacts in a .CSV file into iWork Numbers and it takes a 12-digit phone number from a guy in the UK and turns it into scientific notation. So something like 447729803988 becomes 4.4772E+11 which obviously loses some important digits. Is there a way to force Numbers to treat all fields as text on import so it doesn't drop this critical data? thanks
    Sean

    scrollin,
    Your digits are all there. Just format those cells to either Text or Number. Leading zeros do tend to get lost unless you pre-format to text. You can force the cell format to text on the fly by prefixing your input with a single-quote.
    Regards,
    Jerry

  • Long number in CSV file appearing in scientific notation by default

    Hi,
    How can I stop a long number in a CSV file that is opened in excel from appearing in scientific notation by default?
    eg.
    "hello","778002405501 ", "yes"
    becomes:
    hello | 7.78002E+11 | yes
    I have tried wrapping the data in quotes in the csv but to no avail.
    Thanks in advance,
    Alistair

    You can change the extension from ".csv" to ".xls" and use table to form the data and use
    style=”mso-number-format:\@;”
    Please read the sample code below in Classic ASP:
    You can also read in my blog http://sarbashish.wordpress.com/2012/11/30/export-to-excel-how-to-prevent-long-numbers-from-scientific-notation/
    <%
    Response.Clear
    Response.CacheControl = “no-cache”
    Response.AddHeader “Pragma”, “no-cache”
    Response.Expires = -1
    Response.ContentType = “application/vnd.ms-excel”
    Dim FileName
    FileName = “TestDB Lookup-” & month(now)&”-”&day(now)&”-”&year(now)&”.xls”
    Response.AddHeader “Content-Disposition”, “inline;filename=” & FileName
    %>
    <html xmlns:o=”urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office” xmlns:x=”urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:excel” xmlns=”http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40″;>
    <head>
    <meta http-equiv=Content-Type content=”text/html; charset=UTF-8″>
    <!–[if gte mso 9]>
    <xml>
    <x:ExcelWorkbook>
    <x:ExcelWorksheet>
    <x:WorksheetOptions>
    <x:DisplayGridlines/>
    </x:WorksheetOptions>
    </x:ExcelWorksheet>
    </x:ExcelWorksheets>
    </x:ExcelWorkbook>
    </xml>
    <![endif]–>
    </head>
    <body>
    <table border=”0″>
    <tr>
    <td>ID</td>
    <td>Name</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
    <td style=”mso-number-format:\@;”>01234567890123456567678788989909000030</td>
    <td>Sarbashish B</td>
    </tr>
    </table>
    </body>
    </html>
    Sarbashish Bhattacharjee http://sarbashish.wordpress.com

  • Importing data in scientific notation format

    Hi,
    I've got some data files produced by some ancient laboratory software. In the files, numbers are formatted like this:
    +7.60609E-02
    +8.18901E-03
    etc.
    When I import the data into Numbers, Numbers does not seem to recognize that the data points represent numbers, rather than strings (I can't create plots from the data, for example). If I edit the cells to prepend "=" to the entry, then Numbers evaluates the entry as if it were scientific notation (which is what I want), so that +7.60609E-02 becomes 0.760609. Is there a way to indicate to Numbers that the data I am importing is in scientific notation format, and should be treated as such? Because I'm not too excited about manually prepending "=" to everything.
    Thanks

    If the file is a comma separated values file, you have two choices:
    1) Make a Numbers sheet that is formatted the way you want it, including formatting the cells in the column to be scientific.  Drag the file from Finder and drop it on cell A1 of the table or, if not A1, the top-left cell of where you wantthe data to begin in the table, like maybe cell B2. Or,
    2) Open the CSV file with Numbers. After import, select the column of numbers and format it as scientific.

  • Scientific Notation when Downloading Reports

    When downloading reports from a web template, in either Excel or CSV, some values are getting converted to scientific notation in the downloaded file. I am wondering if there is a setting which prevents any data to be converted to scientific notation when downloading. The data appears to be fine when viewing the report in Web.

    Hi Ripel
    You have downloaded the file to CSV which is also excel based format and uses most of the Excel's features, and when data is CSV file is in scientic foirmat , same will come in notepad..just do one thing select the format as number in the csv file by selecting column...and save it...in csv/notepad you will now see actual value
    Thanks
    Tripple k

  • Convert scientific notation value into normal number

    hi,
    I am importing excel(.csv) file into Oracle database, a value in excel file 8.70773E+11 is displaying in scientific notation format, i want to store it like 870772521002.

    i have already run this query, it gave me 871000000000.0000000000 this result.
    Table Structure,
    SQL> desc cdr;
    Name Null? Type
    INVOICENO VARCHAR2(50)
    OCEANREGION NUMBER
    CALLDATE DATE
    CALLTIME VARCHAR2(10)
    ORIGINATORNO                             VARCHAR2(50)
    SUBSCRIBER VARCHAR2(75)
    DESTNO VARCHAR2(50)
    VOLUME FLOAT(50)
    UNIT VARCHAR2(5)
    this above Originatorno field had Number data type, but it wasnt working.

  • Problem in viewing CSV file

    I am generating CSV file from PL/SQL code. I am using UTIL_FILE for writing file.
    One of the column in csv file is too big. The value is displayed in scientic notation.
    Is there any way that i can modify my code to display data in Number format(Instead of scientific format)
    Any help is appreciated.
    Thanks in Advance
    Gopinath

    The problem is that the user wants to view the file
    in Excel and they dont want to do any format changes
    in excel sheet. They want everything to be done at
    code level.Or, how about spooling formatted numbers in the csv itself, if your end users are okay with it ? For example:
    1234567890123,1234567890123,1234567890123,1234567890123
    "1234567890123","1234567890123","1234567890123","1234567890123"
    "1,234,567,890,123","1,234,567,890,123","1,234,567,890,123","1,234,567,890,123"The first two lines show up in scientific notation, but the third line shows up as is.
    pratz
    Message was edited by:
    pratz

  • Select Query resulting in Scientific Notation

    Hello all,
    I am running a Select query through a batch file that extracts data from an Oracle database. Several of the fields that I am extracting from contain numbers that are up to 38 digits long. When I extract the data, it converts the numbers into scientific notation and it is important for me to have the entire field. Is there something I can change to my query that will pull the data in its entire form? This is what I'm running now:
    select * FROM ML.APPT where APPTDATE >= to_date('01/1/2010','mm/dd/yyyy'
    I apologize in advance if this has been answered already.
    Thanks!

    >
    When the extractor finishes, it returns the data into a flat file.
    don't quite understand the TO_CHAR function. Does this function mean I need to say something like this: select "TO_CHAR('column name', 99999999999999999999999999999999999999" FROM ML.APPT where APPTDATE >= to_date('01/1/2010','mm/dd/yyyy')
    >
    Yes- if the tool you use to extract the data (your 'extractor') is converting the numeric data to a string then it is responsible for creating the string in the proper format. If the number is an integer that can have as many digits as you have '9's in your sample format string then that is what you need to do.
    Here is how sql*plus (Oracle's tool) will display the data using default settings
    SQL> select 12345678901234567890123456789012345678 no_format,
      2  to_char(12345678901234567890123456789012345678, '99999999999999999999999999
    999999999999') with_format
      3   from dual;
    NO_FORMAT WITH_FORMAT
    1.2346E+37  12345678901234567890123456789012345678
    SQL>
    ----- TOAD will display something similiar but the default uses more decimal digits in the scientific notation data
    NO_FORMAT,WITH_FORMAT
    1.23456789012346E37, 12345678901234567890123456789012345678You can either format the numeric data in the query using TO_CHAR or the 'extractor' can do it when it converts the data to a string.

  • Scientific Notation on MID

    having trouble with a
    parsed out excel file.
    We import processor files into our application and do so with maybe 20 different processors.
    However one file is giving us a particular problem, even though the MID colum looks to be  a simple MID like this
    8788840008835  it actually shows up once  extracted like this 8.78884000884E+012 scientific notarion
    this is the only file we have this problem with and even if we go in and reformat the colum in various ways so the column looks correct it still spits out this scientific notation.
    tried number format likwe this  #LSNumberFormat(objSheet.Query.column2, "______")#
    and like this #numberformat(objSheet.Query.column2,'_______________________')#   it that keeps the number from being in scientific notation however it rounds the MID on the last number to the closest zero effectivly ruining the data.
    Any ideas on how to get around this?
    BTW its not the initial extraction thats doing it, we use it on many other excel files with no problems, only this file is giving us this problem
    Thanks in advance for any help

    scrollin,
    Your digits are all there. Just format those cells to either Text or Number. Leading zeros do tend to get lost unless you pre-format to text. You can force the cell format to text on the fly by prefixing your input with a single-quote.
    Regards,
    Jerry

  • Powershell / Scientific Notation Woes / Formatting Output to Live Excel Sheet

    I have a WMI query in a script that dumps machine information to a live excel sheet.
    I find when I query the model # of the machine using (this line of code from the script):
    $Sheet.Cells.Item($count,4) = (Get-WmiObject win32_computersystem -ComputerName $computer).Model
    The output almost always changes into Scientific Notation, because this is a typical model number :   "3500-E52"
    Is there a way to modify the formatting of the:
    $Sheet.Cells.Item($count,4)
    so that Excel uses "text" formatting for that cell?  I know you can change the fonts etc... but have not been lucky in finding a powershell > excel reference
    that explains how to change a cell or column's formatting beyond the basics.
    I have seen recommendations to others to dump the results queries to a CSV first, and then import into Excel (which would allow a manual change of that column's format).  I'm just
    hoping to bypass the extra "hands on" and format more directly to a sheet in Excel.
    If .csv is the best way to go, I'll muddle through it and change the code.
    Any help is greatly appreciated.
    Ben

    $sheet.Cells(1,1).NumberFormat
    = "@"
    ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

  • Remove scientific notation in report

    I'm calculating a number and placing it in a comment box on a report. This works fine, but one of the numbers has decided to display in scientific notation (1.52666667e-3). The problem is that the comment box is not large enough to display the scientific notation and gives no indication of not fitting into the box. Instead I see 1.52666 with no indication of the exponent. I'd much rather see .001527 however I don't want to force a STR format with "d.dddddd" because most numbers don't need this much precision and I'd probably run into errors for numbers such as 12345 which won't fit into the comment box with forced 6 digit precision. If I can force it out of scientific precision, it'll probably be fine.
    BTW: is there a certain number range where scientific notation becomes the default? If I knew this range I could then force the format with the STR function to display the way I want. e.g. IF x>-001 and x<.001 then STR(X,"d.dddd")
    Either method would probably work for me.
    thanks,
    James
    Solved!
    Go to Solution.

    MyVar is a 2 dimensional pointer (Channel Group, Channel) to numeric channels that meet some criteria.
    change box size: I had to make the box 3 times the width to display the number correctly. It shows 1.27933333333333E-03*. I'm appending the "*" to show the field is calculated instead of unadultered from the .csv. Maybe the problem isn't that the number is small, but that it's infinitely repeating. The number is calculate from the values .001919 - abs(.001919)/3
    Left Justify: no difference from right justify.
    Autoadj: shows 1.28E-
    I'm making a column of channels on the report, that's why the comment text is being set multiple times.
    Humphreyy - thanks for your ideas and help.

  • Key Figures being displayed in Scientific Notation

    Hi GURU's,
    I have created a Analysis Process Designer (MultiCube to Flat File) and everything seems to be ok in that but the output for 2 of the key figures are in scientific notation (i.e. 10 decimal places) and this needs to be fixed up immediately.
    The value of the Key Figure is displayed as 1.72E04 instead of 1,7231810000000001E04
    How do I go about solving this issue.
    Thanks & Regards,
    Praveen Battula

    I think in floating point math adding 1 to 9999999999999899999999 is going to be a meaningless operation as by the time one converts 1 to a floating point of the scale & precision needed to represent 9999999999999899999999, it's going to lose any significance (ie: it's going to basically be represented as zero).
    You'll need to do a search on how to deal with numbers of very high precision & scale.  I don't have any code to hand.  Have you done any of your own investigation on how to deal with this?
    Adam

  • Calculator and Scientific Notation

    My Calculator App seems to randomly switch back to scientific notation instead of displaying results in regular x.xx format.
    I tried deleting the com.apple.calculator.plist file and then relaunching Calculator but that didn't work.
    Any other suggestions on how to get the calculator app back to displaying results in normal (non-scientific notation) mode?
    thanks

    Then, I'm at a loss. Mine only shows scientific notation when the value exceeds whatever's set as the number's max range. You might want to peruse Calculator's help files.

  • Display Large Float w/o Scientific Notation

    I have a series of dollar amounts (from an SQL cursor) that I am summing up using a java.lang.Float. The values total correctly, but when I display the value it is displayed using Scientific Notation (4.19150150185925 E12). I need to write my total value to a file that will be exported to another application (mainframe). Therefore, the value when written to the output file must be 4191501501859.25. How do I get the value in that form, instead of the scientific notation form?
    Should I be using a different type to sum my values into? The max value my total can reach is 99999999999999999.999
    Thanks.

    No, I meant precisely what I said. If BigDecimal
    does indeed have a valueOf method that accepts a
    string, please notify Sun, as they will certainly
    have to update the documentation -- didn't YOU
    read the documentation link that you yourself
    sent me?
    No, of course not, I only checked that it indeed does not have any method that takes a String parameter and that the method to "add" numbers is really called "add".
    By the way, a constructor that takes a String parameter does pretty much the same thing as a method that takes a String parameter and returns a new instance of the class. There is no significant difference between Float's valueOf(String) and the Float(String) constructor as far the user of the API is concerned.
    (Looking up the source just for fun I see that Float.valueOf(String) and Float(String) do completely different things, and Float(String) creates a temporary extra Float object. The comment above says: "REMIND: this is inefficient". Interesting.)
    Probably not, you were apparently too busy taking
    a 'tude.No doubt! :-)

  • TO_CHAR not Scientific Notation

    I want to convert a number to a string but guarantee that the result will NOT be in scientific notation.
    TO_CHAR(num, '9999999999.99999999999999') is not very convenient since the data type of the number is BINARY_DOUBLE and I will not know how many significant figures the number will have.

    user3975338 wrote:
    So is it safe to say there there is no built in feature that would ever output a the numeric string
    '0.00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000009'The scientific notation is only a matter of how the particular interface is displaying the number and how your NLS settings are for converting automatically between numbers and varchar.
    e.g. in SQL*Plus you can change the format of a column easily...
    SQL> ed
    Wrote file afiedt.buf
      1  with t as (select cast(1.0000000000000001E-001 as binary_double) as dbl from dual union all
      2             select 4.0144896E+008 from dual union all
      3             select 3.0976E+005 from dual union all
      4             select 2.78784E+006 from dual union all
      5             select 6.4E+001 from dual union all
      6             select 2.7878400000000001E+003 from dual union all
      7             select 2.4909766860524436E-011 from dual union all
      8             select 1.0000000000000001E-001 from dual union all
      9             select 7.7160493827160492E-005 from dual union all
    10             select 6.9444444444444436E-004 from dual)
    11  --
    12  select dbl, dbl2, length(trim(dbl2)) as ldbl
    13  from (
    14    select dbl, rtrim(rtrim(to_char(dbl,'99999999999999990.999999999999999999999999999'),'0'),'.') as dbl2
    15    from t
    16*   )
    SQL> /
           DBL DBL2                                                 LDBL
      1.0E-001                  0.10000000000000001                   19
    4.014E+008          401448960                                      9
    3.098E+005             309760                                      6
    2.788E+006            2787840                                      7
      6.4E+001                 64                                      2
    2.788E+003               2787.8400000000001                       18
    2.491E-011                  0.000000000024909766860524436         29
      1.0E-001                  0.10000000000000001                   19
    7.716E-005                  0.000077160493827160492               23
    6.944E-004                  0.00069444444444444436                22
    10 rows selected.
    SQL> col dbl format 999999999990.9999999999999999999999999999999
    SQL> /
                                              DBL DBL2                                                 LDBL
                0.1000000000000000100000000000000                  0.10000000000000001                   19
        401448960.0000000000000000000000000000000          401448960                                      9
           309760.0000000000000000000000000000000             309760                                      6
          2787840.0000000000000000000000000000000            2787840                                      7
               64.0000000000000000000000000000000                 64                                      2
             2787.8400000000001000000000000000000               2787.8400000000001                       18
                0.0000000000249097668605244360000                  0.000000000024909766860524436         29
                0.1000000000000000100000000000000                  0.10000000000000001                   19
                0.0000771604938271604920000000000                  0.000077160493827160492               23
                0.0006944444444444443600000000000                  0.00069444444444444436                22
    10 rows selected.
    SQL>... see ... no scientific notation any more.

Maybe you are looking for