North American Student Dashboard Challenge – Business Case Questions

Students, post your business case questions for the North American Student Dashboard Challenge here.
Good luck with the challenge!

Two of the KPIs which need to be included in the dashboard are:
1. Income vs Expenses
2. Performance to Budget
There is no income statement in the attached excel files, we are just given statement of cash flow. For individual items under revenue and expense we need an income statement. This is required for designing dashboard for KPI 1.
For KPI 2, the case study asks to display comparison of Actual vs Budget for 4 revenue items - corporate, individual, foundations, and special events - as a chart component. The attached excel files does not have adequate information on this either.
I see only two spreadsheets in the Excel file JA Financial Statements 2006 - 2011 - 1. Statements of Functional Expense; and 2. Statements of Cash Flow - Table.
Please help what needs to be done here. The case study says to refer - Statement of Activites Tab from JA Financial Statements.xls for KPI 1 and KPI 2. However, there is no such spreadsheet on this Excel file. I have downloaded the project data from the following link: http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/uac/index?rid=/library/uuid/30ee1571-2533-2f10-31bd-8826243425ee
Thanks,
Chandan

Similar Messages

Oracle North American Payroll Customers - US Q2 Statutory Updates Released

Dear Oracle North American Payroll Customer,
The United States (US) Second Quarter Statutory Update (Q2), 2006 has been released!
The following patches are available:
R11i: 4938760
R11: 4938760
Please be sure to carefully read ALL the readmes before beginning to install
these patches, to ensure successful processing!
The functional readmes are available on MetaLink:
US Q2 2006 Statutory Update Readme R11i - NOTE. 374042.1
US Q2 2006 Statutory Update Readme Rel 11 - NOTE. 374043.1
We would like to make you aware of several important points. Please read this entire note carefully.
1. US Q2 2006 Statutory Update Highlights
2. Other Important Notes
3. R11i HRMS Product Information
4. Payroll Recommended Patches
5. HR Recommended Patches
6. Global OHUG Conference
7. Other Information
8. Canadian Payroll Customers
A. US Q2 2006 Statutory Update Highlights
* JIT and School District Updates
* Miscellaneous Statutory Bug Fixes
Please refer to the readmes on Metalink for full details. See above for Note numbers.
B. Other Important Notes
Recorded TOIs (Transfer of Information) for the FPK RUP1 are available through Oracle University:
Go to the Oracle University url: http://ilearning.oracle.com/ilearn/en/learner/jsp/user_home.jsp
Select the Catalog tab
Search for the appropriate course or enter R12.
Note: You must be able to access the 'Knowledge Center' to view these TOIs. You may be required to purchase the Oracle University Knowledge Center Passport.
The Oracle University Knowledge Center Passport is the most cost-effective way to give multiple users the Oracle, PeopleSoft, and JD Edwards training they need. Provide your Enterprise with unlimited access to the entire catalog of web based OU Knowledge Center offerings. Your employees gain the opportunity to learn new skills, sharpen existing ones, and take advantage of thousands of web based classes to meet their ongoing training needs. As an added bonus, students can keep their valuable skills up-to-date with unlimited access to all new Oracle University Knowledge Center courses added within the one-year period from the date of purchase.
Patch Information:
- Enhanced Vertex Consolidated patch (5187702) this patch delivers all code updates/fixes that have been made to the enhanced tax interface since the 2005 Year End patches. It is included in this FPK RUP1 patch, but is also available as a stand alone patch 5187702.
- The Annual Geocode update (5253339) will be released in July 2006 and will be mandatory for Year End processing for both R11i and R11
- For Statutory patching requirements, please refer to the North American
Payroll Annual Patching Schedule document available on MetaLink. Note: 216109.1 <http://metalink.oracle.com/metalink/plsql/ml2_documents.showNOT?p_id=216109.1>
- US HR Customers: We will be releasing a US HR Rollup Patch (5179027) in August 2006 that will include the new Ethnic and Job categories required for 2007 reporting.
Desupport Information:
- Note: 329685.1/329689.1 Product Obsolescence / De-support Information: Oracle Corporation announces the end of Error Correction Support for E-Business Suite (Oracle Applications) version(s) 11.0 & 11.0.x on the following platform(s): ALL Platforms version(s) All, effective 31-JAN-2007. Oracle Corporation recommends customers upgrade/migrate to the following as soon as possible to maintain the highest level of support: Oracle E-Business Suite 11.5.7 or higher. For North American customers, 2006 will be the last year end supported. Quarterly updates beyond Q4 2006 will not be provided. No new JIT/Geocode updates will be provided beyond Q4/Year End. If new jurisdictions are added with a tax rate, no taxation will occur.
- As a result of the above de-support dates, Applications customers must upgrade to 9i in order to run 2006 Year End.
- If you are an 11.0.3 customer, please see Note: 329685.1.
- Please note that Tax and Legislative updates are not available for products during the 'extended support' phase. Please see note 334749.1 <https://metalink.oracle.com/metalink/plsql/showdoc?db=NOT&id=334749.1> for specific details regarding the availability of legislative patches.
- Discoverer 4i de-support. Reference note 237607.1 ALERT: Required and Recommended Patch Levels for All Discoverer Versions
- For Oracle HRMS Product Family - Release 11i Information, see note 135266.1.
Year End Information for Payroll:
o All mandatory patches are required for R11
o The Annual Geocode update (5253339) will be released in July 2006 and will be mandatory for Year End processing for both R11i and R11
o The HRMS Family Pack K Rollup patch is mandatory for R11i for Year End and is a pre-requisite for the Year End Phase 1 patch.
o Year End Phase 1 will be released on Sept 30th, Year End Phase 2 (includes Q4) will be released on Dec 15th, Year Begin will be released as a one-off (also included in Phase 2) on Dec 15th and Year End Phase 3 will be released on January 15th, 2006. Due to statutory or late breaking updates, the Jan 15th date is subject to change.
o Like last year, Year End Phase 2 and Phase 3 will be offered as incremental patches ONLY. Cumulative versions will not be released. This means that Year End Phase 1 is a pre-requisite to Year End Phase 2 and 3. Incremental patches do not require the application of a new HR legislative data install (hrglobal). Customers only need to apply the hrglobal driver currently installed.
Note: FPK RUP1 is a pre-requisite for Year End Phase 1. Year End Phase 1 is a pre-requisite for Year Begin. As in the past several years, Year Begin should be applied for any client going live in 2007.
For the complete R11i Payroll Mandatory Patch List see Metalink Note 111499.1 <http://metalink.oracle.com/metalink/plsql/showdoc?db=NOT&id=111499.1>
For the complete R11 Payroll Mandatory Patch List see Metalink Note 74293.1 <http://metalink.oracle.com/metalink/plsql/showdoc?db=NOT&id=74293.1>
For additional non-mandatory North American Payroll patches see Metalink Note 74292.1 <http://metalink.oracle.com/metalink/plsql/showdoc?db=NOT&id=74292.1>
C. R11i HRMS Product Information
For the latest Oracle HRMS Product Family - Release 11i Information,
please see Metalink Note:135266.1
This page contains important information including:
o High Priority Alerts
o Mandatory Patches
o Family Packs and Minipacks
o Latest Legislative Data - hrglobal.drv
o Maintenance Pack Information
D. Payroll Recommended Patches
The Payroll recommended patch spreadsheet Metalink Note 74292.1 contains additional features and functions.
E. HR Recommended Patches
We have created an HR Recommended patch spreadsheet similar to the Mandatory Payroll patch spreadsheet on Metalink. This new spreadsheet contains a list of patches needed to be in compliance for HR Statutory reporting i.e. EEO-1, VETS-100 etc.
The spreadsheet is located on Metalink in Note number: 273196.1
F. Global OHUG Conference
2006 Fall OHUG Conference
Location: Orlando Florida
Dates: November 29 - December 1
Hotel: Rosen Shingle Creek
Hotel Reservations: 866-996-9939 refer to the OHUG rate of $165.00 a night. http://rosenshinglecreek.com/
G. Other Information Sources
1. MetaLink - http://metalink.oracle.com <http://metalink.oracle.com/>
MetaLink is a customer resource provided by Oracle World-wide Support.
The Applications section of Metalink contains all the latest product documentation and documentation updates for Oracles products.
2. Payroll World
Payroll World is an email distribution list for North American Oracle Payroll customers used to quickly disseminate information regarding product updates, patches, and statutory changes. To be added to this email distribution list, send e-mail to: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: Oracle North American Payroll World Contact Update with your contact name, CSI number, and company name
3. Metalink Service Request profiles:
Please update all Service Request profiles on Metalink with any updates to Database Version, Product Version, and/or contact information
Metalink->UserProfile button
4. Information for NEW North American Payroll customers:
A pamphlet is available for all North American Payroll customers explaining Vertex, Payroll World, SIG's, etc.
The North American Payroll Handout document can be located in Metalink Note 316077.1
H. Canadian Payroll Customers
A reminder to Canadian Payroll customers that the Payroll Tax Q Series
(Quantum) version 2.7.6 program (patch 5326425) and the June data file are required for the tax changes effective July 1, 2006. Please note that Quantum 2.7.6 has a Canadian pre-req of patch 5223777. The Federal and Alberta basic personal amount changes effective July 1, 2006 are available with patch 5237516.

We need to know the new codes which will be added and which if any will be replaced. We know those identified on the US Gov site but can Oracle Dev. provide the specifics in advance so we can update our Employment Applications etc to match Oracle HR definitions?
Regards,
Ed

ATTN: Oracle North American Payroll Customers:End of Year Phase 1 and Q3...

ATTN: Oracle North American Payroll Customers: End of Year Phase 1 and Q3 2007 Statutory Update Released!
Dear Oracle North American HCM Customer,
North American End of Year Phase 1 and the United States (US) Third
Quarter Statutory Updates (Q3), 2007 have been released!
US Q3 2007 Statutory Update patch numbers:
* R11i: 6155000
* R12: 6155000
*Note – FPK RUP2 is not required for the US Q3 2007 Statutory Update
End of Year Phase 1 (includes Q3 Statutory Update) patch numbers:
· R11i: 6133333
* R12: 6133333 (targetted for October 8th release)
We would like to make you aware of several important points. Please read
this entire note carefully.
1. US Q3 2007 Statutory Update highlights
2. End of Year Phase 1 highlights
3. Other Important Notes
4. Lifetime Support Policy: Coverage for Applications
5. R11i HRMS Product Information
6. Payroll Recommended Patches
7. HR Recommended Patches
8. Other Information
A. US Q3 2007 Statutory Update highlights
* JIT and School District Updates
* Miscellaneous Statutory Bug Fixes
Please see the readmes on Metalink for full details:
3rd Qtr 2007 US Payroll Readme for Rel 11i – Note: 458431.1
B. End of Year Phase 1 highlights
US:
* JIT/Geocode updates
* Annual Geocode Patch Released
o Patch 6117000 11i one-off released 04-Sep-2007
o Included in EOY Phase 1
o Readme Note: 456835.1
* Wage Accumulation
o Significant enhancement to the way the application
accumulates wages for reporting
o Joint project with Vertex to enhance processing of
reciprocity rules at state and local levels
o Changes within the Vertex engine allow for improved handling
of multiple work jurisdictions
o Provides users with the ability to control how work taxes
affect taxes at residence locations and if wages should be
accumulated at employee’s residence location
o Readme Note: 460678.1
o
Note:
Quantum 2.9.1 will be the pre-requisite for End of Year 2007 processing
Additional Updates included in 2.9.1:
o 5520588 – Resident State Tax Not given credit for Work State
County Tax Withheld (Lives in NY works where ‘local’ tax is
withheld)
o 5897764 - FIT W/H Should be 35% After $1M Supplemental Wages
even if Employee is Exempt
o 5937604 - Delaware state income tax is being over-withheld
on the second (and subsequent) supplemental payments in the
same pay period.
o 5730236 - YTD EI Deduction Stopped at 729.29 INSTEAD OF 729.30
Evergreen Forms:
The following forms are available from Evergreen for W-2s and 1099-Rs
· Blank perforated W-2 #5208 Window envelope 4444-1
· Blank perforated 1099-R #5179 Window envelope 6161-1
· Preprinted W-2 #5218 Window envelope 5151-1
· Preprinted 1099-R #7159-4 Window envelope 7777-1
**Note: This is the last year we will support the preprinted W-2 and
1099R. For EOY 2008 we will only support the pdf version of these two
reports that print on blank forms.
Customers can order forms at 800-248-2898 or go to www.evergrn.com
<http://www.evergrn.com>
RR Donnelley (formerly Moore) Forms:
The following forms are available from RR Donnelley (formerly Moore) for
W-2s and 1099-Rs
* Blank perforated W-2 (with printed instructions on back) -
LW28700BW (50 PK)
* Blank perforated W-2 (with printed instructions on back) -
LW28700B (2000 BULK)
* Blank perforated W-2 (blank on back) - LW28700BLANKW (50 PK)
* Blank perforated W-2 (blank on back) - LW28700BLANK (2000 BULK)
* Window envelope for W-2 - 7987E
* Blank perforated 1099R (with printed instructions on back) -LR4UPB
(50 PK)
* Blank perforated 1099R (with printed instructions on back)
LR4UPBBULK (2000 BULK)
* Blank perforated 1099R (blank on back) - L4UPBLANK (50 PK)
* Blank perforated 1099R (blank on back) - L4UPBLANKBULK (2000 BULK)
* Window envelope for 1099R - DW4ALT
Customers can order forms at 877-526-3885 – reference Oracle customer #
521836
Canada:
* Miscellaneous Bug Fixes
Mexico:
* Miscellaneous Bug Fixes
Please see the readme on Metalink for full details:
US 2007 Payroll Year End Phase 1 Readme Rel 11i Note 456990.1
US 2007 Payroll Year End Phase 1 Readme Rel 12Note 456991.1
MX 2007 Payroll Year End Phase 1 Readme Rel 11i NOTE.458559.1
MX 2007 Payroll Year End Phase 1 Readme Rel 12 NOTE.458566.1
CA 2007 Payroll Year End Phase 1 Readme Rel 11i NOTE.458561.1
CA 2007 Payroll Year End Phase 1 Readme Rel 12 NOTE.458563.1
C. Other Important Notes
US Check/Deposit Advice XML
There are some additional dependencies for this patch that were not
originally communicated. Applying the EOY Phase 1 patch first satisfies
these dependencies. If there is a need to apply this patch prior to
applying EOY Phase 1 we are exploring possible alternative
pre-requisites and will send out a notice late next week with more
information.
* 11i one-off Patch 6399100 released 21-Sep-2007
* R12 will be part of Release Update (RUP) 12.0.4
Oracle will de-support the Live Checkwriter and Deposit Advice for US
and Canada beginning with 2007 EOY Phase 1. Archive Checkwriter and
Deposit Advice will continue to be supported. What this means is that
new code changes and bug fixes will not be tested on the Live
Checkwriter and Deposit Advice. Additionally, enhancements made to the
Archive version will NOT be made for the Live version.
Desupport of Standard Tax Interface
Oracle no longer supports the Standard Tax interface. Taxes will
continue to be calculated and tax rate changes from the Vertex Data
Updates will continue. New code changes and bug fixes will not be tested
on the Standard Interface and we cannot guarantee that all functionality
will continue to work. Additionally, enhancements made to taxes will NOT
be made for the Standard Tax Interface. We strongly recommend that you
upgrade immediately to the Enhanced Tax interface.
Vertex Customer Café:
The Customer Café is a comprehensive online information source
specifically for Vertex customers. It’s easier than ever to get the
support and information you need to maximize your investment in Vertex
products. Some of the many benefits to using the Customer Café include:
o Access to monthly data download files, release bulletins, schedules
and considerations.
o Early notification bulletins, late rate notifications, and support
notices.
o Online Knowledge Center that provides quick answers to questions and
issues.
o Online inquiry submission
o Access to fully-indexed online documentation for all Vertex software
products.
o Easy access to Vertex software training information and registration.
To register for the Customer Café, just visit the Vertex website at
www.vertexinc.com <http://www.vertexinc.com/>.
Year End Information for Payroll:
Family pack K rollup 2 (5337777) is mandatory for R11i Year End and is a
pre-requisite for Year End Phase 1. This patch was released on Friday,
June 22, 2007.
The R12 RUP (12.0.2) is mandatory for year end for R12
For the complete R12 Payroll Mandatory Patch List see Metalink Note 386434.1
For the complete R11i Payroll Mandatory Patch List see Metalink Note
111499.1
<http://metalink.oracle.com/metalink/plsql/showdoc?db=NOT&id=111499.1
<http://metalink.oracle.com/metalink/plsql/showdoc?db=NOT&id=111499.1>>
For additional non-mandatory North American Payroll patches see Metalink
Note 74292.1
<http://metalink.oracle.com/metalink/plsql/showdoc?db=NOT&id=74292.1
<http://metalink.oracle.com/metalink/plsql/showdoc?db=NOT&id=74292.1>>
D. Lifetime Support Policy: Coverage for Applications
Important Reminder:
Please pay attention to the Oracle E-Business Suite Support dates for
your point release. Statutory or regulatory updates are not available
beyond the ‘Extended Support Date’.
11.5.7 came out of Premier Support in May 2007
11.5.8 will come out of Premier Support in Nov 2007
11.5.9 will come out of Premier Support in Jun 2008
Extended Support has not been offered for 11.5.7, 11.5.8 or 11.5.9
Premier and Extended Support include - Tax legal and regulatory updates
Sustaining Support Does NOT include new tax, legal, and regulatory updates.
For the full definitions of what this means to an 11.5.7/11.5.8 customer
please read the full fact sheet available at:-
http://www.oracle.com/support/library/data-sheet/oracle-lifetime-support-policy-datasheet.pdf
*NOTE: For 2007 Payroll Year End, minimally you will need to be on 11.5.9.
E. R11i HRMS Product Information
For the latest Oracle HRMS Product Family - Release 11i Information,
please see Metalink Note:135266.1
This page contains important information including:
* High Priority Alerts
* Mandatory Patches
* Family Packs and Minipacks
* Latest Legislative Data - hrglobal.drv
* Maintenance Pack Information
F. Payroll Recommended Patches
The Payroll recommended patch spreadsheet Metalink Note 74292.1 contains
additional features and functions.
G. HR Recommended Patches
The HR Recommended spreadsheet contains a list of patches needed to be
in compliance for HR Statutory reporting i.e. EEO-1, VETS-100 etc.
The spreadsheet is located on Metalink in Note number: 273196.1
H. Other Information
1. MetaLink - http://metalink.oracle.com <http://metalink.oracle.com/>
<http://metalink.oracle.com/>
MetaLink is a customer resource provided by Oracle World-wide Support.
The Applications section of Metalink contains all the latest product
documentation and documentation updates for Oracle’s products.
2. Payroll World
Payroll World is an email distribution list for North American Oracle
Payroll customers used to quickly disseminate information regarding
product updates, patches, and statutory changes. To be added to this
email distribution list, send e-mail to: [email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: Oracle North American Payroll World Contact Update with your
contact name, CSI number, and company name
3. Metalink Service Request profiles:
Please update all Service Request profiles on Metalink with any updates
to Database Version, Product Version, and/or contact information
Metalink->UserProfile button
4. Information for NEW North American Payroll customers:
A pamphlet is available for all North American Payroll customers
explaining Vertex, Payroll World, SIG's, etc.
The North American Payroll Handout document can be located in Metalink
Note 316077.1

Chris,
If you are referring to (Patch 7395025 - Q3 2008 JIT SQWL UPDATE FOR R11I), then you can apply it on 11.5.9. Just make sure you have all pre-req. patches applied.
Note: 737173.1 - 2008 US Payroll Year End Phase 1 Readme Rel 11i
https://metalink2.oracle.com/metalink/plsql/ml2_documents.showDocument?p_database_id=NOT&p_id=737173.1

Model Object / Business Logic question

Hello,
Question about how to architect the model objects and services in our system. We are defining our own Model Object / Transfer Objects without the use of an ORM tool (long story). Some of these model objects have to maintain Association objects such as:
public class Teacher {
     private List<StudentAssociation> kids;
public class StudentAssociation {
     private Teacher teacher;
     private Student student;
     private Date fromDate;
     private Date toDate;
     // Getters / Setters ....
}My question is, where should the logic be to add, remove student associations? Originally we had it defined in the Teacher model object with:
public void addStudentAssociation(Student student, Date fromDate, Date toDate);
public void removeStudentAssociation(Student student, Date fromDate, Date toDate);But I am hesitant to put such logic in the Model Object. I always thought those should be pretty empty of any sort of business logic. Instead I want to have a TeacherService that does that and instead just a getter/setter on the Teacher object for the Association List. However, in doing that, I find I have to create a new List of Associations then call the setAssociations method on the Teacher object, which seems kind of strange.
Is it bad to put the add/remove method in the model object itself? The remove logic has a bit of business logic in it, so it seems weird being there.

Not sure I can be of much help, but here's my two cents worth:
You have a teacher object and student object. A teacher doesnt really have an association with a student. I think you need another object such as a class object. I class has a teacher and the students (an association can be a business association, social association, etc). That same teacher may be assigned to other classes (provided they dont occur at the same time since the teacher cant be in the two classes at the same time. Likewise, for a student. Complicating things is the fact that a teacher of one class may be a student in another class. Also, a class may exist that has students but no assigned teacher yet (your original idea wouldn't be able to handle this since you will need a teacher before you add students). Another case, you have a class without students. Still another case, you have people (either future students, or teaching staff that haven't been assigned as teachers yet), but no classes yet., I think it would be best to figure out a database schema first (you can use Oracle Lite, MySql, etc).
here is an example:
Assuming you are putting this in a database I would create tables and fields something like this:
Person ((a person is either a student or teacher, or just someone that is no longer a student or teacher but may be one day))
personId not null
firstname not null
middleName nullable
lastname not null
ssn not null
Class ( a class is where a teacher teaches students))
classId not null
nameOfCourse not null
building nullable (may not be assigned yet)
room nullable (may not be assigned yet)
startDate ((when the class starts)) nullable
endDate ((when the class ends)) nullable
teacherId ((this is the parentId from the person table)) nullable
Students
personId ((this is the personId from the person table))
classId
associations:
a class has 0 or 1 teacher,
0 or many students
a teacherId must exist in the person table as a personId
a studentId must exist in the person table as a personId
(if you delete a personId in the person table, it cascades deletes any teacherId or studentId of the same value)
your class has a collection of students. therefore:
private List<Student> students
Your class will also have something like
addStudent(Student student) (throw exception if student already exists) (note you dont pass in the start and
end date since its the class's responsibility for start and end date, not student)
isStudent(Student student) (return true if student is already in class, false if not)
deleteStudent(Student student) ((returns true if student found and deleted, false if student not found to delete)
Your business logic can check things such as if the start date occurs before the end date (an error), you have a class with no teacher or no students, etc. The first case you can do in the database with constraints if you want, but the second you cant since you want to store info for a class even if a teacher isn't assigned to it yet.
One way to do this is to have a validate() function in your class object. The validate() function checks such things as a class with no teacher and returns a collection of warnings if it finds anything wrong. All the above is just something off the top of my head. So there may be some issues with my approach that you will have to work out.
Good Luck!

North American migration - August 31st [Completed]

Hi everyone,
Our migration project is approaching its second major step, with our North American data center moving to its new location. On AUGUST 31st, 2013 the Business Catalyst North American data center will be migrated to the new Amazon Web Service infrastructure. As part of the migration process all sites located on our North American data center will experience an offline maintenance window of up to 8 hours. Please see below the full details of the maintenance and downtime expected.
Procedure: Migrating all sites currently hosted on the North American BC data center to the new AWS infrastructure
Target start time*: 12 AM EDT (9 PM PDT) (Check local times here)
Target end time*: 8 AM EDT
Duration: We are targeting an 8 hour migration window. During this time, all sites hosted in North America will be unavailable. The migration window may vary, and we will be sure to keep you informed of any changes.
* Start time and end time are estimates. Depending on actual conditions on the day the start and end of the migration may vary.
Services unavailable during the migration
During the migration window all sites and services will be unavailable for sites hosted on the North American data center for the duration of the move. A list of areas affected can be found below:
Site front-end and Admin Console will display a maintenance page
Email campaigns scheduled during migration window will be sent once the migration is complete
SFTP - file upload/download
Dreamweaver extension will not be available for the duration of the migration
Publish site in Muse will be unavailable
Email notifications - operational emails will not be received
The webmail link in the Admin console will be unavailable
All other areas of sites hosted on the North American data center. Sites located on other data centers of Business Catalyst will not be affected.
Updating your DNS settings
If you have not already updated the DNS settings for your client sites, please do so in the next 2 weeks. If you fail to do so, your sites may be unavailable following the migration. For further instruction on how to migrate your DNS settings, please refer to the dedicated migration site..
Stay up to date
Our team will provide constant updates during the migration process. To keep up to date, please follow our blog and Twitter feeds. There, you will find constant updates prior to and during the migration, while our dedicated page on the migration website will provide constant updates during the migration itself.
Let us know if you have any questions or concerns as we approach the migration, and we will do our best to help you navigate this as easy as possible.
The Business Catalyst team

Hi everyone!
The US migration has completed.
Please review the migration page for any details related to today's and previous migration information.
- http://adobebcmigration.com/
Have a wonderful weekend!
-Sidney

Typical business case scenarios for SharePoint 2013 Apps

What are the typical real time business case scenario for 1. SharePoint Hosted apps 2. Auto Hosted apps 3. provider hosted Apps? Why people choose any of this model apps model in comparison to typical On-Premise solution?
Another question comes is when should one go for On-Premise solution rather than Apps? What are real time scenarios?

Let's discuss first whether to develop apps or full trust solution.
Talking about technical aspect, On-Premise solution is popular choice for organizations who have SharePoint hosted on premise (not SharePoint Online). However, if you are using SharePoint Online, there's no choice except Apps (and possibly sandbox but deprecated).
So for SharePoint Online only viable solution is developing apps. However for on-premise you can develop full trust or apps. However since apps requires a bit more configuration and not yet full feature set as you can do with full trust, most people are still
developing full trust solution on premise.
Talking about business requirement at hand, you can develop apps (even in on-premise), if your requirement is really looks like an app. For example, you would like to develop a SharePoint solution, that will show data from SAP inside SharePoint. The solution
mostly nothing to do with SharePoint but calling SAP services to perform stuffs. So you can develop an apps and deploy inside SharePoint. Another example is import CSV files in SharePoint list, you can write an apps. But mostly I think you need to decide whether
to develop apps depends on the Apps API ability. The API is still very limited in features/functionalities. So even if your requirement looks like apps you can't develop apps if the current SharePoint Apps API doesn't support the functionality.
Now let's talk about which apps model you would like to use SharePoint Hosted apps means everything hosted inside SharePoint and no other external infrastructure is required. One example is the CSV file upload apps. However, with SharePoint hosted apps,
you can't use C# rather you just have javascript to develop the apps. There's rumours that auto hosted apps will be deprecated not sure but there's not more conceptual difference apart from where the apps is hosted (both hosted outside SharePoint). Provider/auto-hosted
apps will be running outside SharePoint (i.e., in IIS web site), and communicate to SharePoint through REST or client object model. One provider hosted apps in the office app market is adlib pdf conversion. The apps allows you to select multiple files and
covert them to pdf file. Basically the conversion site is hosted somewhere outside (in the provider's infrastructure). When you select all the files and click 'convert' from ribbon user is redirected to the provider site (different url) and the files are merged
and converted to pdf. Since it's outside of sharepoint, you can use any development language (C#, java, php etc.). The provider hosted app talks to sharepoint through REST or client object model.
So in summary, sharepoint hosted app has less complexity as it doesn't require another infrastructure and runs inside sharepoint. However you are limited to use only javascript to develop your apps. On the other hand with provider hosted apps, you can use
any development language but you need to consider extra level of security/complexity to integrate the app with sharepoint.
Thanks,
Sohel Rana
http://ranaictiu-technicalblog.blogspot.com
Thanks for this nice reply. Plz clarify if only Auto hosted apps will be deprecated or provider hosted apps also may be deprecated by MS?

ATTN: Oracle North American HCM Customers: Q1 2007 Statutory Update Release

Dear Oracle North American HCM Customer,
The United States (US) First Quarter Statutory Update (Q1), 2007 has been released!
Patch number:
* R11i: 5917868
*Note: The Q1 2007 Statutory patch does not include the Year End patches, but it does pre-req the Year End Phase 3 patch.
The functional readme is available on MetaLink:
US Q1 2007 Statutory Update Readme R11i - NOTE. 421114.1
Please be sure to carefully read the readme before beginning to install this patch, to ensure successful processing!
We would like to make you aware of several important points. Please read this entire note carefully.
A. Q1 2007 Highlights
B. Other Important Notes
C. R11i HRMS Product Information
D. Payroll Recommended Patches
E. HR Recommended Patches
F. Global OHUG Conference
G. Other Information
A. Q1 2007 Highlights
* JIT and School District Updates
* Miscellaneous Statutory Bug Fixes
Please refer to the readme on Metalink for full details. See above for Note number.
B. Other Important Notes
Checkwriter/Deposit Advice:
Oracle will de-support the Live Checkwriter and Deposit Advice for US and Canada beginning with EOY Phase 1 in September. Archive Checkwriter and Deposit Advice will continue to be supported. What this means is that new code changes and bug fixes will not be tested on the Live Checkwriter and Deposit Advice. Additionally, enhancements made to the Archive version will NOT be made for the Live version.
*Note: If you would like to view the output of the archive version of this report without needing pre-printed stationery, try the following in a test instance:
disable the trigger pay_action_parameters_ari
insert a row in pay_action_parameters with the following value -
name=PRINT_REPORT_LABELS
value=PAYUSCDA
enable the trigger pay_action_parameters_ari
Run the report. This will print the labels and make it easier to check the report without needing pre-printed stationery.
In early summer, we are targeting release of an XML version of Checkwriter and Deposit Advice.
R12 Released:
We are pleased to announce the availability of Oracle Applications E-Business Suite Release 12, the Global Business Release. Release 12 is currently available for both new and upgrading customers on all supported languages through Oracle E-Delivery and the Oracle Store. Please check EPD for specific Platform availability and continue to check E-Delivery for additional Platforms to be available.
References:
E-Business Suite Release 12 on Oracle.com
<http://www.oracle.com/applications/e-business-suite-release.html>
R12 Information Center on MetaLink
<https://metalink.oracle.com/metalink/plsql/ml2_documents.showDocument?p_database_id=NOT&p_id=401740.1>
Documentation Roadmap on MetaLink
<https://metalink.oracle.com/metalink/plsql/ml2_documents.showDocument?p_database_id=NOT&p_id=394692.1>
Translation Information on MetaLink
<https://metalink.oracle.com/metalink/plsql/ml2_documents.showDocument?p_database_id=NOT&p_id=405992.1>
Note: E-Business Suite Release 12 will NOT be a requirement for
processing 2007 year end.
HCM Configuration Workbench:
HCM Configuration Workbench Rollup Patch 5 (5135963 ) has been released to Oracle MetaLink for customer download.
This patch delivers the HRMS Configuration Workbench HRMS Family Pack K
Delta RUP1 Certification patch, for more information please refer to the Readme of this patch and navigate to the ‘E. New Features in Patch 5135963’ section of the readme to see more details.
Year End Information for Payroll:
The HRMS Family Pack K Rollup 2 patch will be mandatory for R11i for Year End and is a pre-requisite for the Year End Phase 1 patch.
For the complete R11i Payroll Mandatory Patch List see Metalink Note
111499.1
For the complete R11 Payroll Mandatory Patch List see Metalink Note 74293.1
For additional non-mandatory North American Payroll patches see Metalink Note 74292.1
C. R11i HRMS Product Information
For the latest Oracle HRMS Product Family - Release 11i Information, please see Metalink Note:135266.1 This page contains important information including:
* High Priority Alerts
* Mandatory Patches
* Family Packs and Minipacks
* Latest Legislative Data - hrglobal.drv
* Maintenance Pack Information
D. Payroll Recommended Patches
The Payroll recommended patch spreadsheet Metalink Note 74292.1 contains additional features and functions.
E. HR Recommended Patches
The HR Recommended spreadsheet contains a list of patches needed to be in compliance for HR Statutory reporting i.e. EEO-1, VETS-100 etc. The spreadsheet is located on Metalink in Note number: 273196.1
F. Global OHUG Conference
Mark your calendar!
The Global OHUG 2007 Conference will be held in Las Vegas, Nevada!
Monday, September 24th - Thursday, September 27th
Location:
* Paris Hotel & Casino, Las Vegas, Nevada - Hotel Contact Number:
888-266-5687 refer to the OHUG (Oracle HCM Users Group) group rate of
$179.00 a night
Visit www.ohug.org for more information.
G. Other Information
1. MetaLink - http://metalink.oracle.com
MetaLink is a customer resource provided by Oracle World-wide Support. The Applications section of Metalink contains all the latest product documentation and documentation updates for Oracle’s products.
2. Payroll World
Payroll World is an email distribution list for North American Oracle Payroll customers used to quickly disseminate information regarding product updates, patches, and statutory changes. To be added to this email distribution list, send e-mail to: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: Oracle North American Payroll World Contact Update with your
contact name, CSI number, and company name
3. Metalink Service Request profiles:
Please update all Service Request profiles on Metalink with any updates to Database Version, Product Version, and/or contact information Metalink->UserProfile button
4. Information for NEW North American Payroll customers:
A pamphlet is available for all North American Payroll customers explaining Vertex, Payroll World, SIG's, etc.
The North American Payroll Handout document can be located in Metalink
Note 316077.1
Regards,
Greg

We need to know the new codes which will be added and which if any will be replaced. We know those identified on the US Gov site but can Oracle Dev. provide the specifics in advance so we can update our Employment Applications etc to match Oracle HR definitions?
Regards,
Ed

Using a North American PowerBook in Europe (Istanbul, Turkey)?

Hello,
My wife is traveling to Istanbul (Turkey) with work and she'll be bringing my PowerBook 12" with her. It looks like Istanbul uses the same electricity type as France (220V at 50 Hz with a double-pinned round plug) so I don't imagine there should be any problem plugging in the PowerBook while there as long as she's using the correct adapter to convert the North American plug-type to the type needed. We were in Paris last year and had no problems, so I'm thinking it should be the same with Istanbul, but would appreciate any advice anyone may have?
And, while I've never read anything definitive to confirm this, is it true that the power bricks that come with the PowerBook actually convert the power so as to be able to use it in different parts of the world (as long as you have a plug adapter)? Like I said, I've had no problems doing this in the past, so I assume this is true, but again, just wondering if anyone knows for sure?
Thanks!
Kristin.

kristin. wrote:
And, while I've never read anything definitive to confirm this, is it true that the power bricks that come with the PowerBook actually convert the power so as to be able to use it in different parts of the world (as long as you have a plug adapter)?
To answer this question you can always look at the label on the power supply (of any appliance, not just Macs). If it only says 120, it's only going to work on US-type power grids and you'll need a transformer too. If it says something like 100-240 volts, it's good anywhere in the world and you only need an adapter, no transformer.
My brick has labels on two sides and the voltage range is listed on only one of those, so if you don't see it, turn it around.
You might consider an adapter with a surge protector if the power quality at the destination might be unstable.

Need Business case Explaination about the Field in Customer Master

Hi all,
I have a doubt in Customer master Record
1. Customer Group
2. Price Group
3. Price list
4. Customer Stat.group
What I mentioned above fields i need business case explination, but all the above fileds are explaining about the Price and Statistics about the report. By using F1 Help i can understand but i need business case
Is there any link between those fields ?
@ Please dont close the thread if it is basic question please provide the details and link because i serached in Google but i couldn't able to findout

hi
anuradha,
In my knowledge customer pricing group is the main in the customer master ,
you will one test case in customer pricing group in customer u can not fill it, the same customer u can rise the sale order , system sows earorr message, no customer master records maintain, it means when u create the sale order system take pricing procedure , pricing procedure determination ; sales area+customer pricing procedure +document pricing procedure assign to pricing procedure,(ovkk) ,
customer statical group
Sales Organization      0001   Sales Org. 001
Distribution Channel    01
Division                       00
Cust.stats.grp              1      'A' Material
CustGroupMaterial       1      'A' Material
StatGrpSalesDoc         2      Returns, Credit Memo
StatGrpDocumentItm     1      Returns, Credit Memo
Update Group               1      SIS: Sales Document, Delivery, Billing Document
it is the static updating group for item level,
Sales Organization     0001   Sales Org. 001
Distribution Channel    01
Division                        01
Cust.stats.grp             1      'A' Material
StatGrpSalesDoc        1      Order, Debit Memo
Update Group              1      SIS: Sales Document, Delivery, Billing Document
it is for static updating group for header level
it is use full in vov7 ,
price list and price group it is use full pricing to the customers, you can check it sale order header in sale tab u can find your required fields,

Should SAP seek out "negative" business cases from knowledgeable SCN'ers

A few years ago, I had the privilege of contributing a "positive" SAP business case to Mark Yolton's dossier (it had to do with the help that SCN'ers gave me during two real development crises caused by my client's HQ getting nosy in a way that the client didn't expect.)
My question now is the following.
By fortunate or unfortunate coincidence, I currently have a ringside seat to an amazing drama in which an upstart "agile nimble" product is beating the pants off a less-than-agile/less-than-nimble product that SAP recently acquired. This drama is unfolding at a major US organization, and involves the organization site-licensing the "agile nimble" product for units of the organization to develop stuff on their own that they would literally have to wait months or years to get if they asked the organization's IT team to try and create the same stuff with the "dinosaur" product. (Plus, believe it or not, SAP's dinosaur is actually lacking many features that come "standard" with the new upstart product.)
This situation is not pleasant to watch ... I am not only professionally committed to SAP, but think very highly of the company (with some relatively minor differences of opinion), and I hate to see the SAP product trounced at this organization because SAP apparently can't see the writing on the wall (or which way the wind is blowing, if you prefer a '60's metaphor from the last century.)
So - I am sure that I'm not the only SCN'er who's in this situation - i.e. not the only SCN'er who has the opportunity to be a first-hand witness to a business case that isn't working out well for SAP.
And if this is the case, shouldn't SAP be seeking out SCN'ers who can provide first-hand accounts of why and how an SAP product is doing poorly rather than well? (Think here of the model of the Weather Channel, with its network of committed viewers who send in bulletins, photos, etc, in severe weather emergency situations.)
Or should SAP emulate the ostrich (i.e., stick its head in the sand) and choose not to obtain "early warning signals" from SCN "eyewitnesses"?
Is that question "loaded" enough for everyone? I hope so, because SCN'ers could provide a valuable source of free valuable information that SAP would have to pay marketing consulting firms some pretty hefty fees to otherwise obtain.
djh

Stephen - you wrote:
The only problems I can think is how does a company know that the person reporting it, is not a competitor trying to throw you off course or some other person with less than pure intentions than reporting what they have seen.
And it's funny that you see the problem in that direction, but not the problem in the other direction, i.e. the problem with relying on info directly from clients.
Here's just one of many reasons why SAP can't really rely on info directly from clients.
Assume some outfit has been using a certain SAP product for many years, and furthermore, that the champions of this SAP product within the outfit are all relatives of Dilbert's famous character Mordor ("Preventor of Information Technology)".
Assume also that one important reason these Mordors like the SAP product is because they know it will help them keep their own locked-down centralized control of IT (relative to both data access and new development).
Finally, assume also that there are champions of some new upstart "nimble/agile" competitor to SAP's product within the same outfit. i.e. a group of folks who have actually used the new upstart product to jumpstart IT development that the Mordors would either never do, or take years to do.
Who do you think SAP is going to be able to talk to if it approaches this outfit for feed-back?
Do you really think the Mordors will ever let SAP near the champions of the new upstart product?
If you do, I've got the proverbial ocean-front property in AZ and the Brooklyn Bridge to sell you.
What SAP should be doing in this case is licensing the nimble upstart as a reseller and figuring out how to feed this upstart from the SAP "centralizing" product, i.e. let each product do what it does best.
But SAP will never ever learn that this is what it should do if it listens to the "client" in this case.
Because all it will hear is the chant of the Mordors.
Best
djh
PS - and remember also the classic Cold War scenario, where the Soviet military had much in common with the US military in the sense that they both wanted to maximize their shares of the overall national budgets. In the same sense, there are probably plenty of Mordors inside SAP who are only too happy that SAP will only hear from the Mordors at the client in the above case. The internal SAP Mordors don't want to have to rethink their Weltanschauung, do they ?

North Americans Only. Europeans Not Allowed!

Has anyone managed to get InContext working out side of America? Particularly with a .co.uk or .fr or even a UK based .com address!
If Adobe insists on discriminating against the rest of the world by (currently) restricting InContext to North America... Surely, it should also restrict it's advertising / promotion to that region. Is just me or does anyone else think it's a gnats manipulative to "Shout from the rooftops" to all and sundry (Europeans included) about this all singing, all dancing wonderful new technological addition to dreamweaver that's going to revolutionize our lives. Yet then add the cravat that says "Hey... Forget it unless live in North America. Even North Americans who have access to the service have rebelled over the fact that it might cost a bit... I could really go on and on... and on a bit more over this point, but I'll resist the temptation save to say that at least you (North Americans) have something to complain about.
Save a thought for us "erm Allies.." denied the chance to even evaluate the product. Despite being fed the same encouragement to buy it
"So what if you bought CS4 just for this much lauded feature! Suckers! Read the small print next time." This Is The Land Of The Free"... (to rip you off.)
On first blush, It would appear that Adobe's claims for this feature bring new meaning to phrases "Ramped-Up" and "Over-Hyped" even for those actually living in North America. I'm told, by those who know, that the product is a barely beta, prematurely released bug ridden mess at the moment that thinks that Spry is a misspelling of a popular soft drink.... but that's not the point. Even if that is the case, it's the seeming resurrection of segregation that troubles most.

Seriously, politics aside, what is the logical explanation for this move anyway? Living in europe I have a bunch of overseas connections concerning my work as web designer - from hosting services to every other imaginable service connected with web design like optimization and analysis tools - and I NEVER have had any problem whatsoever in using those services the way they were supposed to be used, and, honestly, given the nature of the world wide web network I seriously dont see any obstacles to put regional limitations to such products????
Maybe someone from adobe would be able to reason this adequately?
And the only company and product that from some peculiar reason is limited to north america only is from a company that one would really expect it to be able to make it global and also be able to thoroughly support it globally.
Instead the north americans got a beta version from what I hear and whilst I was considering it as a good possibility, even if it became payable, once they made it proper and working I bumped into befuddling piece of information that the service will be only available in n. america.

What's the business case for using adobe forms for handling print forms

Hi
We are just starting our SAP project and are looking at the possibility to use Adobe forms for generating and printing our forms, like purchase orders, invoices etc.
My Question is:
1. Is this possible / adviseable ?
2. if so - what's the business case in using Adobe forms - <i> We have been looking on the SAP Pricing for adobe interactive form, and in our point of view it's grotesque high</i>
3. What other options do we have - do we need to settle with SAP Script / Smartforms ?
Regards
Morten Nielsen

Hi Morten,
1. Is this possible / adviseable ?
As far I know SAP is going to stop support for SAPScript in coming years (I don't know exact dates). It is pretty much advisable to use Adobe Print Forms.
2. if so - what's the business case in using Adobe forms - We have been looking on the
SAP Pricing for adobe interactive form, and in our point of view it's grotesque high
We can use Adobe Print Forms where ever we can able to use SApscripts/PDF print Forms.
3. What other options do we have - do we need to settle with SAP Script / Smartforms ?
It is better to settle with Adobe forms rather than using SAPscript/Smart forms. One of the main reason for this is maintainance is much easier than SAPscript/Smart forms.
But remember that Java Stack need to be installed in order to use Adobe Forms.
Please visit the below SDN area on Adobe forms for more details.
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/interactiveforms
Thanks
Ramakrishna
Message was edited by:
Ramakrishna Ramisetti

Support Packs - Business Case

I support the SAP instance at a small SME. We run ECC6 for FICO SD MM & HR (but not payroll or BI). It has been two years since the last support pack update. The support packs are 13 & 15 and HR is on 32, the Kernel for 700_REL is 175.
To build a business case for patching to later releases I need to find where SAP gives a broad description of the support Packs and a description of the improvements made. Am I correct that these shall only include note changes but no enhancements to business processes.
Is the best forum for this question?

> To build a business case for patching to later releases I need to find where SAP gives a broad description of the support Packs and a description of the improvements made. Am I correct that these shall only include note changes but no enhancements to business processes.
Exactly - that's what support packages should be, theoretically. Usually they also contain small improvements or "backports" of newer releases.
I wonder that you were able to run your HR so long without any support package updates, usually HR contains critical legal changes for each country, especially on (fiscal) year changes.
To see what happened between source and target SP level check
http://service.sap.com/sp-stacks
--> SP Stack Download & Side effect report
and
http://service.sap.com/side-effect
Markus

Advice on how to build a business case for partitioning

Hi Everyone,
I'm the architect of a business intelligence/data warehouse team. We've grown to the point where I believe we need database partitioning. I believe we are at about 1.5 TB of data. Our largest tables are in the 100 million row counts with relatively wide record lengths (~100 columns). Our just sort of large tables are in the 10 million to 50 million range, however, they have very long row lengths (~300 columns). Based on our future source system plans, our data will become even more granular and there is still a need to maintain our historical data.
Those aren't the only reasons, but are some of the larger driving issues that are making most members of our team think it's time we purchased database partitioning. Our team is pretty unanimous for partitioning, many of our source system partners also consider it a "no-brainer", however, we're getting push back from our CIO saying that 1.5 TB and 100 million records isn't that much data as compared to other "big data" companies and that it doesn't require partitioning.
Does anyone have a advice on how to build an business case for purchasing partitioning? Is there a good way to demonstrate cost-vs-benefit value?
Thanks for your feedback.
-=Joe

I'm going to be contrarian and start from the end of your post.
>
Does anyone have a advice on how to build an business case for purchasing partitioning? Is there a good way to demonstrate cost-vs-benefit value?
>
Yes - forget about cost-vs-benefit. That's the CIOs job not yours. You're an architect. Stick to architecture. Design and implement the architecture needed to meet the business requirements of your projects. If you are given requirements that can't be met with your current infrastructure then that is when you should propose alternative infrastructure.
>
We've grown to the point where I believe we need database partitioning. I believe we are at about 1.5 TB of data. Our largest tables are in the 100 million row counts with relatively wide record lengths (~100 columns). Our just sort of large tables are in the 10 million to 50 million range, however, they have very long row lengths (~300 columns). Based on our future source system plans, our data will become even more granular and there is still a need to maintain our historical data.
Those aren't the only reasons, but are some of the larger driving issues that are making most members of our team think it's time we purchased database partitioning.
>
NONSENSE! That's what ALL of the above statements represent - UTTER AND ABSOLUTE NONSENSE.
Who cares what you believe? Beliefs don't carry weight, facts do. You do list some facts: 1.5 TB of data, 100 million row counts, wide record lengths, large sorts, long rows, data will get more granular, need to maintain historical data.
Ho Hum! So what? How do ANY of those facts indicate any sort of issue or problem, existing or potential, at all? They don't. You haven't provided information that suggests that ANY of those facts illustrate what Justin referred to as 'pain points'.
Unless those facts prevent you from doing your job of providing an architecture that meets the business requirements you don't have a leg to stand on.
My first reaction to your request would be similar to your cio's. Implicit in your cio's response are some questions you need to ask and answer
1. What is it that you do now that you can't do with the current architecture?
2. What is it that you need to do for an upcoming requirement that you can't do with the current architecture?
3. What alternatives are available to modify the current architecture to do what can't be done in items #1 and #2 above?
That #3 is where my skepticism lies. You seem to have already concluded that partitioning is the answer. Why? What problems do you think it will solve? Why not RAC? Why not a separate data warehouse system? Why not split that historical data off into an OLAP system? Maybe that can reduce the size of the OLTP system to where you won't have whatever problems you are having.
Partitioning is just about addressing some performance issues. A lot of times partitioning is used more for management purposes such as loading/offloading data without impacting those huge tables you are talking about.
If my hot queries use a primary key value to retrieve data it isn't going to matter much if the tables are partitioned or not.
That is what sets the context for what Justin is telling you. You and your team need to document the constraints (and SLAs) your system currently has, how close you are to hitting those constraints, your options for avoiding/evading those constraints using the current infrastructure and the options for avoiding/evading those constraints using a modified architecture.
It is up to the CIO to do the cost-benefit analysis of working within the limits imposed by the current infrastructure versus modifiying the architecture.

Regarding ESA-Business case

Hi friends...
Good Morning,...
I am working in ESA.. I need to prepare showcase project for my company. I am new to ESA.. I read some of the documents from SDN under enterprise SOA area.. I need the business some business for ESA.. If anybody have the very good business case for ESA.. Please share with me.. My email id is [email protected].
Hopping to get soon from you friends...
Regards..
Kumar..

Hi Kumar,
Here you can find a business case as well as the technical implementaions for an esa scenario.
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/webcontent/uuid/703c1d77-7d9f-2910-66b0-a18b58299dfa [original link is broken]
Also SAP Enterprise SOA Showcase Customer Initiative for Partners :
https://websmp207.sap-ag.de/~form/sapnet?_SHORTKEY=01100035870000695548&_SCENARIO=01100035870000000192&_ADDINC=&
eSOA case studies can be found here:
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/webcontent/uuid/f4f1fe1f-0b01-0010-dba1-e1c3bdc6cd64. [original link is broken]
Hope your question is answered!

North American Student Dashboard Challenge – Business Case Questions

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for