Noscript tag - exclusion

Hello,
is it possible to exclude <noscript> tag from generated adf page? Firefox has a problem with it in print preview.

upload the new Scripts folder and it's contents to the remote
site.
see here for more info:
http://www.adobe.com/devnet/activecontent/
http://www.laflash.org/community/?q=node/80

Similar Messages

How to do a jsp:include inside a noscript tag??

I am new to JSP and I need help to do a <jsp:include page="pageName" /> inside a <noscript> tag. My goal is to include another jsp if the user has javascript disabled on its browser.
I am using a JSP template that retrieves content from the Database, so I need to pass a parameter also, like:
<noscript>
<jsp:include page="/include/template.jsp" flush="true"/>
<jsp:param name="pageName" value="holidays_onboard_html"/>
</noscript>
My code doesn't seem to work. I found an explanation that says that the noscript tag is interpreted after the servlet already tried to compose the original page, so I can't use a <jsp:include> tag inside the noscript tag. Is it true? Is there any other solution for what I am trying to accomplish?
Thanks a lot!

Java indeed runs at the server side, not at the client side. Java runs at the server side and produces a HTML page. HTML only runs at the client side.
The <noscript> tag is not a Java/JSP tag, it is a HTML tag. What you want is only possible when you checked in Java if the client has JS enabled, e.g. using a request parameter, or by loading the page template using a HTML tag, e.g. <iframe>.

Problem in noscript tag in Jscript

Hi,
i know this is not not the right forum to ask about Jscript,but i've searched for it and found many are posting their question in JSP forum,okay leave it
Here's my question,i got this tag under my <body> tag
<noscript>Hi pls enable Java Script</noscript>and it displays when i disabled the javascript in my browser but,the problem is that the form is still submitting and i don't want that to happen is their anyway that i can stop this like displaying another page if javascript is disabled (dynamically),some code would be help full
Thanks

malick-java wrote:
Hi,
i know this is not not the right forum to ask about Jscript,but i've searched for it and found many are posting their question in JSP forum,okay leave itIf many others are misusing this forum for JS, why would you also do? There are forums devoted to JS available at the web, for example at webdeveloper.com and dynamicdrive.com
and it displays when i disabled the javascript in my browser but,the problem is that the form is still submitting and i don't want that to happen is their anyway that i can stop this like displaying another page if javascript is disabled (dynamically),some code would be help fullJust submit or display the form using Javascript? This way ones without Javascript can't submit or see the form. Think logically.

Displaying Custom messgae in noscript tag.

Hi,
I am using jdev with oracle web center portal 11.1.1.6.0
I have to display custom message(may be a static HTML) if javascript is disabled on browser. Currently ADF adds
<body class="x11w p_AFMaximized">
<noscript>This page uses JavaScript and requires a JavaScript enabled browser.Your browser is not JavaScript enabled.</noscript>
to the HTML page.
I want this message to be customized
Any suggestions on how this can be achived.
Thanks
Rohit

Hi.
Doesn't exist a correct way to customize this message (in ADF/WebCenter Skinning terms).
To customize it you should override trinidad CoreBundle class.
Create a org.apache.myfaces.trinidadinternal.renderkit.core.resource java package.
Create in previous package CoreBundle_[locale].java classes as needed.
package org.apache.myfaces.trinidadinternal.renderkit.core.resource;
import java.util.ListResourceBundle;
public class CoreBundle_es extends ListResourceBundle {
   public Object[][] getContents() {
      return new Object[][] {
         {"NO_SCRIPT_MESSAGE", "No hay JavaScript, mensaje custom"},
From my point of view is not recommended override product classes.
Regards.

HTML Object Tag in HTML Region

I'm trying to embed a flash object within a region. I have the following code in the region source
<noscript>
<object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=10,0,0,0" width="960" height="205" id="Athletic banner" align="middle">
<param name="allowScriptAccess" value="sameDomain" />
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="false" />
<param name="movie" value="banner.swf" />
<param name="quality" value="high" />
<param name="bgcolor" value="#f0f0f0" />
<embed src="banner.swf" quality="high" bgcolor="#f0f0f0" width="960" height="205" name="Athletic banner" align="middle" allowScriptAccess="sameDomain" allowFullScreen="false" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" pluginspage="http://www.adobe.com/go/getflashplayer" />
</object>
</noscript>Unfortunately, it is encoding all of the tags between the noscript tags, so it end up looking like one long string. How do I get it to render it as part of the HTML? Also, why are some tags rendered properly while others are encoded?

Why the element<tt>noscript</tt> element?
>
The NOSCRIPT element allows authors to provide alternate content when a script is not executed. The content of a NOSCRIPT element should only be rendered by a script-aware user agent in the following cases:
<li>The user agent is configured not to evaluate scripts.
<li>The user agent doesn't support a scripting language invoked by a SCRIPT element earlier in the document.
User agents that do not support client-side scripts must render this element's contents.
>
Is the object intended to be rendered as an alternative to scripted content? (APEX doesn't easily work in an environment where JavaScript is not available...)
Check the region type: is it HTML or HTML Text (escape special characters) ? You don't want the latter.

What's the point of noscript

hello;
why bother with <noscript> tags if all the rest of the
HTML will still render anyway;
if you use a redirect such as
<script>window.location=".../yeah.htm"</script> , you
will still end up with a JS-enabled question at the redirected
location, yeah.htm; so redirection just perpetuates the question
instead of solving the issue;
any thoughts?
thanks
dsdsdsdsd

> you I canjam a lot of searchable text up toward the
> fromnt of the HTML that SE spiders will see
This is known as 'spamming' the SE, and will get you banned
from the index
in a hurry. I do not recommend you use this method at all.
> we have never paid a dime to ANY search engine for
placement
Nor have most experienced developers. You can bet if one of
your
competitors complains about your spamming technique you will
no longer
occupy that ranking.
Murray --- ICQ 71997575
Adobe Community Expert
(If you *MUST* email me, don't LAUGH when you do so!)
==================
http://www.projectseven.com/go
- DW FAQs, Tutorials & Resources
http://www.dwfaq.com - DW FAQs,
Tutorials & Resources
==================
"voicesecurity" <[email protected]> wrote in
message
news:fgias5$pqh$[email protected]..
>I have some older pages that used it to render on text
browsers (typically
> non-us clients in developing countries), but the biggest
reason I found to
> still keep using it is that you I canjam a lot of
searchable text up
> toward the
> fromnt of the HTML that SE spiders will see, index on
,and often use in
> serach
> engine results as the description text; regardless of
how fancy and
> complete my
> meta tags are...
>
> www.voice-security.com still has this (three way)
browser compatibility
> from
> way back. Do a search on "voice security" in google,
msn, yahoo, etc. and
> see
> where it ranks... we have never paid a dime to ANY
search engine for
> placement,
> and the <noscript> text seems to have a lot to do
with this. You can skew
> your
> keyword density and also put in mis-spellings of
keywords so that you will
> be
> found where no other related sites are indexed when
somebody makes a typo
> looking for your content....
>

Help inserting a flash video into my web page

Hello!
I'd love some help inserting a flash video into my web page. My web page is hosted by Viviti, templated, and edited online. I can add html to it, and I have the html source for my flash video. I also have uploaded the flash file to the server. Since I am very html illiterate, though, I need some help rewriting the html script so it can be published. There are two problems- firstly, no 'headers' or 'body' allowed in the script- these are already a part of the template. Secondly, I don't know how to rewrite it to refer to the uploaded files. It's also imperative that the full screen mode functions. I've pasted the source code for the flash video here. Please help!!!
Thanks!
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xml:lang="en" lang="en">
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1" />
<title>Drag and drop labelling</title>
<script language="JavaScript" type="text/javascript">

</script>
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff">



<script language="JavaScript" type="text/javascript">
     AC_FL_RunContent(
          'codebase', 'http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=10,0,0,0',
          'width', '720',
          'height', '440',
          'src', 'Drag and drop labelling',
          'quality', 'medium',
          'pluginspage', 'http://www.adobe.com/go/getflashplayer',
          'align', 'middle',
          'play', 'true',
          'loop', 'true',
          'scale', 'showall',
          'wmode', 'window',
          'devicefont', 'false',
          'id', 'Drag and drop labelling',
          'bgcolor', '#ffffff',
          'name', 'Drag and drop labelling',
          'menu', 'true',
          'allowFullScreen', 'true',
          'allowScriptAccess','sameDomain',
          'movie', 'Drag and drop labelling',
          'salign', ''
          ); //end AC code
</script>
<noscript>
     <object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=10,0,0,0" width="720" height="440" id="Drag and drop labelling" align="middle">
     <param name="allowScriptAccess" value="sameDomain" />
     <param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" />
     <param name="movie" value="Drag and drop labelling.swf" /><param name="quality" value="medium" /><param name="bgcolor" value="#ffffff" />     <embed src="Drag and drop labelling.swf" quality="medium" bgcolor="#ffffff" width="720" height="440" name="Drag and drop labelling" align="middle" allowScriptAccess="sameDomain" allowFullScreen="true" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" pluginspage="http://www.adobe.com/go/getflashplayer" />
     </object>
</noscript>
</body>
</html>

What you basically need to do is copy the sections of content from the code you show into the template (assuming the template already provides the <head> and <body> sections of the page. So in the head section of what you show, take everything starting with...
<script language="JavaScript" type="text/javascript">
all the way down thru...
</script>
, inclusive (in the head section only), and paste that into the head section of your template.
Similarly, take everything that lies between the <body> ... </body> tags (exclusive of the body tags) and paste it into the body section of your template wherever you plan to display the Flash file.

DreamWeaver Flash Scripting Mystery

DW 6 cannot view photo galleries created with Lightroom if they have Flash content. When a file with flash content (e.g. index.html0 is opened, the design view in DW says, "Sorry, this photo gallery requires that scripting be enabled on your web browser and that the Adobe Flash Player be installed. Download the Adobe Flash Player". I have enabled Java scriping in both Firefox and IE and both browsers recognize the presence of Flash. This problem does not occur when the index.html file has no Flash content. However, html files with Flash content can be previewed in Firefox but not in IE, where the same error message occurs. All this is in a new Win 8 PC. Any suggestions on solving this mystery will be much appreciated.
Jim

Thanks for your input Sudarshan. The script and noscript tags are present (Although I do not know how these lines got into my code.) Removing them eliminates the error message but the design view pane is still blank. Firefox option is set to enable Java Script. The html can be successfully previewed. Doesn't this confirm presence of Java Script? Here is a snippet of the code:
</script>
<noscript>
                
                <p>
                Sorry, this photo gallery requires that scripting be enabled on your web browser and that the Adobe Flash Player be installed.
                <a href="http://www.adobe.com/go/getflash/">Download the Adobe Flash Player</a>
                </p>
</noscript>

How do you make a Flash file 'searchable' to browsers?

I've heard that ywith Flash you can create an HTML wrapper
and create a style with hidden attributes so meta info can be seen
by browsers. Browsers are looking for content.
How is this done? Are there tutorials that show the process?
Are there 3rd party plug-ins that allow you to add searchable data
to a swf file placed in an HTML page?
Any direction or links to info on this would be appreciated,
Ken

On Tue, 15 Apr 2008 16:45:10 +0000 (UTC), "Ken Nielsen"
<[email protected]> wrote:
>Meanwhile, if anyone has the technique down, please
>share it here. I'll add what I learn about it here later
- it's a six week
>class at the local college.
I don't understand what is the problem. More exactly it is
your little
skills (sorry). Do you know what is <noscript> HTML
tag? It was
defined just for purposes like this. Just use some
JavaScript-based
code (like SWFObject) to put your Flash movie on page, and
then you
can insert anything you like between the <noscript>
</noscript> tags
pair. In any case you must begin from correct HTML headers
definition,
like this:
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN"
http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd">
<html xmlns="
http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"
xml:lang="en" lang="en">
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;
charset=utf-8" />
<meta name="description" content="%s" />
<meta name="keywords" content="%s" />
<meta name="author" content= "%s" />
<meta name="copyright" content= "%s" />
<meta name="robots" content="index, follow" />
<meta name="revisit-after" content="7 days" />
<title>%s</title>
</head>
I've copied it from one of my projects, so Change "%s" to a
correct
string.
There is one problem here. Usual HTML pages have hyperlinks,
which
connects pages within one site. Using Flash you can't show
these links
to the search engine. What to do? Fortunately there is a
solution -
just use siteinfo.xml file at your website to help web
crawlers index
all of your pages. Of course, you can insert hyperlinks into
"noscript" area too, but siteinfo file is useful in any case.
HTH!

Forms applet does not load when request forwarded from custom servlet

I have an existing forms app that I wish to call from a newly-developed servlet. The servlet determines which form to call and then forwards the request to the forms servlet using RequestDispatcher.forward().
The request is forwarded correctly but when it is done all I see is a blank browser (IE7) window. When I View Source I see all the correct HTML code (from basejpi.htm) but it seems my browser does not attempt to load the forms applet. No messages are displayed in the Java Console. This is the same HTML that comes back if I run the forms app directly, e.g. click a link that goes straight to the forms servlet URL, only in that case the forms app starts up fine.
Anyone know why this does not work?

Figured out what is going on:
In basejpi.htm there is "<SCRIPT LANGUAGE=JavaScript SRC=java/forms_ie.js>" that creates an OBJECT tag to load the forms applet. I believe since the context of my custom servlet is different than that of the forms servlet, forms_ie.js is not found when the request is forwarded from my servlet.
One question answered raises another. There is also an OBJECT tag inside a NOSCRIPT tag for machines where scripting has been disabled:

<NOSCRIPT>
<OBJECT name=FormsApplet
type="application/x-java-applet"
...>
</NOSCRIPT>
<SCRIPT LANGUAGE="JavaScript" SRC="java/forms_ie.js"></SCRIPT>
My thinking is to remove the NOSCRIPT tag, and also the SCRIPT tag mentioned above, so all machines will simply see the OBJECT tag, like so:

<OBJECT name=FormsApplet
type="application/x-java-applet"
...>
This makes me wonder why the SCRIPT option is there to begin with. Anyone see a downside to this approach?
Kevin

SWF transparency in IE9-Vista. Nightmare.

I have scoured the web looking for expert input on this issue and sadly I can find none. I am laughable when it comes to Flash, my ability is poor at best. But I have about 6 websites I've made over the last few years, most of which have simple swf files embedded into the html via the <script><noscript> method using the AC_RunActiveContent script. Two of them have nav menus made with Flash, their displaying properly is DEPENDENT on their having transparent backgrounds. The use of "wmode" and "transparent" in the param and embed tags has always worked for me, until now, and the only problem is when the sites are viewed in IE9 running on Win Vista. My main work computer is Win 7 with the 5 major browsers, including IE9, which displays swf transparency fine across all browsers. Recently I went to my wife's office where there are three machines with Windows Vista +IE9.. and one with Windows XP + IE8. The sites display properly as they always have on XP. But on the machines that have Vista OS with the updated IE9 browser, there is a BLACK BOX bg on every swf file of every web page I've ever built. My most recent Flash embed was done with Dreamweaver CS4 and its different embedding method, no <noscript> tags, and different js files. No matter whether I embed the swf with the AC-RunActiveContent.js method or the swfobject_modified.js method of CS4, when I view my pages pages containing Flash objects on Vista machines with IE9, there is that horrible black box background behind the swf.
My first couple of sites were primitive at best, all tabled html, but at least the Flash content displayed the way I wanted it to. I wanted to know if there is a way to embed these swf objects differently so that viewers with Vista + IE9 will see the transparency properly. I know there has to be a way, but my limited knowledge has not found it yet. I would appreciate any input from people who know the ropes. Thanks.

I just noticed something else interesting. Since I know my code skills are poor, I wanted to find a site with PROPERLY embedded swf object on an html page, just to see if it had the same issue as what I'm experiencing when viewing on IE9-Vista. I went to nedwebs.com and it displays fine, but your site is a flash site, so it's not a true comparison to an html page with swf on the page. Then I found this TUTORIAL page, showing the "proper" way to embed a transparent flash object on an html page. The url is here, go look at the animated leaves swf file on this page to see what it is SUPPOSED to look like ...
http://www.aleosoft.com/flashtutorial_transparent.html
Now look at the screen shot I have attached. This is how a "properly" embedded transparent swf displays on IE9 with Vista OS.
You're supposed to see a back-image as well as text through the leaves. On IE9-Vista you see none of this, only BLACK behind the swf, and just the left edge of the back image.

[CS3] HTML Code and JS

Hi,
I exported a html page from Flash CS3. When I take a look at
it in DW
CS3 it shows me some code that I don't understand.
There is a Flash detection js file linked to the html page.
Is it
recommended to use this? What does it do if no plugin is
installed?
And why is the object and embed tag inside a noscript tag?
Does this
make any sense?
I want to include my flash page into a cms system so I want
deliver a
clean html page.
Thanks for any help

Remove all that code and learn this technique:
http://blog.deconcept.com/swfobject/
This is the best way (IMO) to get vaild HTML and XHTML with
Flash content, and it also is very search engine friendly.

Flash not showing up

First of all thank you in advance whomever may help me.
Here's my issue:
I am currently working on this site
FiveStarTrumpet and I
have a flash object at the very top of the page that will not show
up. I have went and checked the page source and it's there but not
at the same time. So I copied the page source and pasted it into a
blank page in DW, just to see if maybe the server added some junk
somewhere that I couldn't see and it shows up fine in DW. I have
never had this issue before and am baffled by it. It's not even
showing a broken link or anything on the page itself. I used
FireFox 2.0.0.1 and IE 6.0 and it didn't show up in either. I'm
still on WinXP so I have not changed any settings as far as the OS
is concerned either. If any more info is needed please let me know.
Thanks,
James

This is how DW8.0.2 inserts Flash to get around the EOLAS
changes in IE. If
you read through the entire code, you'd understand what is
happening. Your
changes will reverse all of this. Not desirable....
Murray --- ICQ 71997575
Adobe Community Expert
(If you *MUST* email me, don't LAUGH when you do so!)
==================
http://www.dreamweavermx-templates.com
- Template Triage!
http://www.projectseven.com/go
- DW FAQs, Tutorials & Resources
http://www.dwfaq.com - DW FAQs,
Tutorials & Resources
http://www.macromedia.com/support/search/
- Macromedia (MM) Technotes
==================
"envision3d" <[email protected]> wrote in
message
news:ergrih$6tr$[email protected]..
>I just noticed something. Your have your flash with
<noscript> tags, which
>only shows when a user doesn't have javascript enabled.
try removing the
><noscript> tags from around the swf.

Trouble viewing in Internet Explorer

Hello,
I created a website in Dreamweaver CS3 and everything was
going fine until I uploaded it and discovered that most of the
content could not be viewed (mostly the flash stuff). I then
discovered that Dreamweaver had randomly inserted <noscrript>
tags for my flash content, so I deleted the <noscript> I then
viewed the page using Firefox in Dreamweaver and all the flash
content had doubled up (it was showing replica images stacked on
top of each other), I then uploaded it and discovered that you can
view it just fine in Firefox and other web browsers but NOT
Internet Explorer which shows the content on the firs page but does
not show 90% of the content (all flash) on the other pages.
The issues
• Firefox (within Dreamweaver) displays doubled up
images after I deleted the <noscript> tags.
• Most of the content of the site can not be viewed
with Internet Explorer
The web address for the site is www.behel-witham.co.uk
I really appreciate all your help
Thanks
Adam

> I then discovered that Dreamweaver had randomly inserted
> <noscrript> tags for my flash content
You are mistaken. DW didn't insert anything randomly. The
<noscript> tags
are in systematic locations and they are there for a good
reason. By
hacking into this you have destroyed the accessability of the
page.
Revert to the original code, and post a link to the page,
please.
Murray --- ICQ 71997575
Adobe Community Expert
(If you *MUST* email me, don't LAUGH when you do so!)
==================
http://www.projectseven.com/go
- DW FAQs, Tutorials & Resources
http://www.dwfaq.com - DW FAQs,
Tutorials & Resources
==================
"adambrind" <[email protected]> wrote in
message
news:fu20rd$3j7$[email protected]..
> Hello,
>
> I created a website in Dreamweaver CS3 and everything
was going fine until
> I
> uploaded it and discovered that most of the content
could not be viewed
> (mostly
> the flash stuff). I then discovered that Dreamweaver had
randomly
> inserted
> <noscrript> tags for my flash content, so I
deleted the <noscript> I then
> viewed the page using Firefox in Dreamweaver and all the
flash content had
> doubled up (it was showing replica images stacked on top
of each other), I
> then
> uploaded it and discovered that you can view it just
fine in Firefox and
> other
> web browsers but NOT Internet Explorer which shows the
content on the firs
> page
> but does not show 90% of the content (all flash) on the
other pages.
>
> The issues
>
> ? Firefox (within Dreamweaver) displays doubled up
images after I deleted
> the
> <noscript> tags.
> ? Most of the content of the site can not be viewed with
Internet Explorer
>
> The web address for the site is www.behel-witham.co.uk
>
> I really appreciate all your help
>
> Thanks
>
> Adam
>
>
>

Section 508 Compliance - Spry Menu

I work for the government and am wondering if you could help
me figure out how I can (or if it's even possible) make the spry
menu features in Dreamweaver Section 508 Compliant, so that people
who have screen readers or Java Script turned off would still be
able to access the spry menu items. When we run the pages that have
spry menus through Dreamweaver's accessibility report it just
relays to us the fact that we are using Java script and we need to
provide a "noscript" tag. Do you have any ideas on how we could
accommodate this in our new web site design?
Thanks! Eleanor

See if this article helps you:
http://www.projectseven.com/tutorials/accessibility/pop_integrated/index.htm
Al Sparber - PVII
http://www.projectseven.com
Fully Automated Menu Systems | Galleries | Widgets
http://www.projectseven.com/go/Elevators
"luchenburg" <[email protected]> wrote in
message
news:g684j9$7jr$[email protected]..
>I work for the government and am wondering if you could
help me figure out
>how
> I can (or if it's even possible) make the spry menu
features in
> Dreamweaver
> Section 508 Compliant, so that people who have screen
readers or Java
> Script
> turned off would still be able to access the spry menu
items. When we run
> the
> pages that have spry menus through Dreamweaver's
accessibility report it
> just
> relays to us the fact that we are using Java script and
we need to provide
> a
> "noscript" tag. Do you have any ideas on how we could
accommodate this in
> our
> new web site design?
>
> Thanks! Eleanor
>
>
>

Noscript tag - exclusion

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for