Nota de remessa na MIGO

Olá Pessoal,
Com relação ao campo Nota de Remessa na tela da MIGO:
No recebimento físico, informa-se a nota fiscal do fornecedor neste campo uma vez que ele é o documento fiscal.
Entendo, ainda, que há também outras razões para isto:
1o. O número da NFe será o documento de referência dentro do documento de material;
2o. No histórico do pedido, constará a NF como documento de referência;
3o. Quando a MIRO for efetuada, pode-se utilizar a opção Nota de Remessa para que a entrada da fatura seja baseada nas entradas da Migo; (Uma vez que uma NF pode se referir a mais de um item do pedido ou outros pedidos)
4o. No final do mês, é através da NF que conseguimos efetuar mais adequadamente uma checagem da conta GR/IR caso haja algum lançamento em aberto;
Estou em um projeto internacional e estão precisando informar um outro documento neste campo da MIGO.
Pergunta:
Vocês vêem alguma restrição em utilizar um outro documento na MIGO-Nota de remessa ao invés da Nota fiscal?
Obrigado

Para complementar a questão:
Ontem, também, abri um chamado no SAP sobre esta dúvida e a resposta foi:
22.11.2010 - 21:01:22 UTC-3 - Resposta by SAP
Ronildo,
O risco de usar outra informação que não seja o número da nota fiscalé grande e não é recomendável. Este campo faz o link em diversos pontos
do sistema para o funcionamento do Brazil localization "standard".
Se a planta for brazileira e você esta usando os processos entregues
pela SAP para localização, é recomendável utilizar com o numero da
nota fiscal mesmo.
Espero ter esclarecido o ponto.
Abraços
Best Regards,
Gustavo de Oliveira
MM Localization Brazil Expert,
SDN FORUM MODERATOR:
SAP Active Global Support

Similar Messages

Not able to post MIGO.

Dear All ,
User is not able to post MIGO as an info displays in status bar " this p.o does not contain any item ".
as user had made a p.o in whihc he had given the qty as 1 EA & also Acttt assign. cat is given.pl help that why this error is coming .
sap11

Vendor Confirmations
In procurement, it is quite normal that once a purchaser sends a Purchase Order to Vendor then he needs a response from vendor expecting some of the information as follows:
Receipt of purchase order by vendor
Acceptance of all the terms and conditions mentioned in purchase order by vendor
Expected date of delivery the goods
Expected date of goods dispatched from the vendor end
Transport confirmation and the shipping notification
And many more
So vendor confirmation is nothing but dispatching of this information to the recipient about the status of the purchase order. Once he has received this then there is a requirement of updating the respective purchase order.
This updating helps the planner to plan the materials more precisely because between the purchase order and planned delivery date, more reliable information has become available.
In Standard SAP, the term "confirmation" (short for "vendor confirmation") has been defined as an umbrella term for various types of information provided by a vendor to a customer, including order acknowledgments, loading or transport confirmations and shipping notifications.
For updating this information in PO, the consultant has to make the following setting in SPRO under the node Set up Confirmation Control:
To define confirmation categories, choose External Confirmation Categories or Internal Confirmation Categories
To define confirmation control keys, choose Confirmation Control Keys
To define the confirmation sequence, choose Confirmation Sequence
Once these settings have been done in SPRO, we have to assign the confirmation control key at item level in the purchase order under the tab page Confirmation. If we are not assigning this we may face error while creating inbound delivery on receipt of shipping notification. Apart from this, reference document for goods receipt will also be decided on these settings.
If there are more than one confirmation categories, then for all confirmation categories, consultant can also specify whether they are for information only or whether they are to constitute a basis for goods receiving and materials planning activities.
Hope this will help you in Understanding Confirmations.

Delivery Note Number should not repeat again during MIGO

Hi Friends,
My client has a requirement to validate the Delivery note filed in the MIGO screen, i.e., the system should allow the user to enter a delivery note number once entered already during goods movement through MIGO. Is there any way that this can be done?
Regards
Guru Prasad

Thanks for the reply Ganesh.
Explaination of the requirement:
During goods receipt the user is supposed to enter the delivery challan number of the vendor in the filed "Delivery Note" in MIGO header. If the user by mistake types the same delivery note number again while posting goods reciept for the same vendor in future, the system should throw an error. If there is any user exit or if it can be done through some development kindly suggest the procedure for the same.
I also checked for the standard system messages, but couldn't find any.
Rgds
Guru Prasad

HECess on CVD amount not determined automatically in MIGO

Hi,
We are using ECC 6.0 and TAXINN.
Condition type for HECess on CVD is 'J1CV'.
CVD amount, ECess on CVD and Additional Custom Duty amount are determined automatically in MIGO.
But HECess on CVD amount not determined automatically in MIGO.
Regards,

Make sure you and configured all the Account determination settings in Logistics - General--Tax on Goods Movements-India-Account Determination. For GRPO ETT....
And also check you had maintained the default settings for import--Logistics - General-Tax on Goods Movements-India-Basic Settings-Determination of Excise Duty-Maintain Excise Defaults...
and check the sub transaction for import is maintained or not.....................

Qty update not active, function not possible error in MIGO

Dear all,
User faces , u201Cqty update not active, function not possibleu201D error in MIGO.
The receipt is for an STO and the material is split valuated. Qty and value updation is active and already similar receipt has been done for many qty.
Throw some light on this
Regards,
Antony

Hi Antony,
Was the material type for the material changed recently? Pls. check the same.
If the qty update is active for the receiving plant & material type, then there should not be any issue.
Regards
Prabhu S

ECess Value not getting displayed in MIGO

Dear All,
When I do a GR against a PO the Ecess Value doesnt flow in MIGO. ( PO created with Non-deductible excise tax code.)
Please note the below details also.
We are using SAP 4.7 version & our tax procedure is TAXINJ.
So can anyone explain how the excise values are determined & displayed in MIGO in case of Non-Deductible excise?
Note: My BED & S&H cess values are displayed in GR but not ECess.
Awaiting your valuable replys.
Regards,

Dear,
Maintain JEX1 & JHX1 as 100% in ur condition Type.
Also maintain in SPRO , in Classifucation Condition type as
TAXINJ JHX1 AT1SETOFFT AT1 Set Off condition Total
TAXINJ JEX1 ECSSETOFFT ECS Set Off condition Total
Regards,
Pardeep Malik
Edited by: Pardeep Malik on Mar 4, 2009 1:05 PM
Edited by: Pardeep Malik on Mar 4, 2009 1:07 PM

Excise Tab is not appear in the MIGO display --- Import Process

Hi Experts ,
Excise tab is not appear in the display of the material document in Import process.
Process flow.
1. Import Po.
2. Customs clearing (MIRO)
3. Capture excise invoice against the Import Po.(Reference to MIRO document )
4.MIGO with movement type 103, in excise tab i selected only refer the excise invoice , here excise ta is coming . Lot is also generated .
after posting the material document , excise tab is not appearing against the material document .
5. post excise against the excise invoice .
Please help.
Thanks
SAP MM
Edited by: Subbas on Aug 16, 2010 11:58 AM

Excise captured & posted using J1IEX using 2 step procedure won't appear in MIGO screen.
Display excise invoice using J1IEX(using vendor excise inv. no. or internal document no)
Only excise captured & posted in MIGO(Single step) will be appear in display of MIGO screeen.
Check SAP Note 952287 - CIN: Limited Functionalities in Country Version India -CIN -Q.no.5
5. Incoming Excise Invoice capture at Blocked stock 103 is not
supported in CIN.
The capture of incoming excise invoice is strictly advised to carryout at
unrestricted stock and not at blocked stock(103/105) due to architectural
issues. The capture at blocked stock may cause wrong excise posting.

Excise not captured in the MIGO & Tax calculation is not correct in the PO.

Excise Settings completed.                    02.11.2007
a)     Configuration done as per J05 Building block.( Tax Procedure TAXINN)
b)     Maintained J1ID, all steps.
c)     Maintained tax code in FTXP.
d)     FV11  Maintained for Material, vendor, Plant in combination with Tax code input tax maintained in FTXP.
e)     Checked CIN Health, all tick are green.
f)     Given all G/L accounts for Excise Transaction Type (ETT)
g)     Maintained all number Ranges.
Issue  1)
Tax calculation is not correct in the PO, tax tab
a)     JMIP is appearing 12% in condition amount, (as per condition record) but condition value is Zero, (Not calculated by the FI Pricing procedure). Screen shot for Pricing procedure, PO taxes and condition record given below.
b)     JIPC Sales tax 4% in condition amount (as per condition record) , calculated by the FI Pricing procedure is 8%, condition value is Rs 8 instead of Rs 4
Fi pricing procedure.
PO Taxes  wrong Tax calculated
FV11 Condition record
Issue  2)
While creating Goods receipt aginst PO (Tax code V2 in PO). Movement type 101, Excise tab appears at Header and Item level and we need to put the Vendors Excise Invoice and date, nothing is copied from the PO for Excise duty & sales tax.
Now we put the values for ED and Sales tax manually in the MIGO and saved the document. While display material document, excise tab is not there i.e. no excise related activiy is captured here in goods receipt.
If you need more detail, please revert on cell 093295 53235.
Please suggest.
Manish Gupta
93295 53235
[email protected]

Hai,
1.Check the condition types JMIP & JMIC in IMG - Financial accting New - FI AC Global settings - Taxes on sales and purchases - Check calculation procedure - Define condition type.
2.The condition types you have used are defined for non deductible taxes i.e., it gets inventorised, added to the material account.And also the accural key assigned to this condition types are NVV - defined for non ded input taxes.
3.Instead the condition types defined by SAP Standard system for BED & ST are JMOP & JIPS and the accurals assigned to this are VS1 & VS5.
If you want clear details mail the screen shots to my id [email protected]

In Inter-company stock transfer Outbound Delivry not getin copied in MIGO

Dear Friends,
I am facing a particular issue. Following are the details:
1. We have inter company stock transfer between plants in two different company code.
2. Currently we do MIGO in the receiving company by the reference of Inbound delivery number.
*Issue:* The outbound delivery number created by the supplying plant is not getting automatically copied in the MIGO.
What might be the problem

amitekum wrote:
. Currently we do MIGO in the receiving company by the reference of Inbound delivery number.
> *Issue:* The outbound delivery number created by the supplying plant is not getting automatically copied in the MIGO.
Hi,
In the receiving plant how you are creating the inbound delivery is it manually or from outbound delivery (triggering output) itself ?

Third party sales COPA document is not getting generated for MIGO

Hi
Kindly help to resolve the following.
Third Party Sale Scenario
While doing to MIGO accounting document and controlling document is getting generated, but not generating COPA document.
In KEI2 and KE4IM assignments are maitained for condition type and value field.
For SD the COPA document is getting generated.
Kindly help to resolve.
Thanks n Regards
N Sathish Kumar

If you have created new GL Accounts to map the Third party scenario, the pre-requesite is that you might need to create cost elemenet with category 11 or 12.
Further only assignments are condition types assigned to value fields.
Check if the billing type is reset under TCode KE4W.

Invoice posting not permissible after posting MIGO

Dear Experts
I don't want to make MIGO ( Goods Receipt ) after making Invoice (MIRO) date.
Suggest me steps for the same.
Regards
viral.

Hi Viral,
You need to incorporate the logic of "System should not allow while doing the MIRO before the Posting date of GRN posting date in the enhancement"
The logic is to take the GR document number from the table DRSEG-LFBNR - Document No. of a Reference Document, retreive the GR posting date from table MKPF, compare the same with the Invoice Posting date. if the invoicing posting date is smaller than the GR posting date then give the error message as "System should not allow while doing the MIRO before the Posting date of GRN posting date" if it is not then no message.This will be applicable only if GR-Based IV is flagged in the PO line item or else the invoices without GR's will not be posted.
You will need an ABAPer to develop the same in the sytem.
U may write the above code in
Exit Function Module : EXIT_SAPLMRMP_010
Include : ZXM08U16
Regards,
Kiran

Stock not updating after doing MIGO (gr) for third party sales

i am doing third party sales, after creating PO with PR and updating stock through Migo , i am not able find the stock, but i can see through MB51 only , i am see the stock through MMBE or MB52

Dear friend
Hope you are clear about third party process
In third party process vndor supplies the goods directly to customer and the goods does not come to our premises at all
In many of the scenarios that i have seen there is no MIGO itself done
To have MIGO is purely optional in third party
I am enclosing here with the threads which were discussed on the same
Forum post in ERP - Sales and Distribution (SD) General: MIGO- why we do it in third party sales?
MIGO- why we do it in third party sales?
Forum post in ERP - Sales and Distribution (SD) General: Why MIGO is required in thirdparty scenarion?
Why MIGO is required in thirdparty scenarion?
The stock updation after MIGO is posted directly to consumption account and we dont keep the stock
So it is not seen in MMBE or MB52 (which is a physical inventory orstock report)
The stock is not there? How can you see that ?
If still you want to see the stocks this is entirely against business logics and consult with your MM and FI colleagues (as this query is their area of operation)
If the third party process is happening with item category TAB then stock updation will take place after MIGO and you can see the same in MMBE/MB52
If not happening means there is some customization error with the PO from MM side Check with MM colleague
Make sure if the item category is TAB then schedule line category is CB
In VOV6 for schedulle line category CB
NB is the order type
0 is the item category
E is the account assignment category
Regards
Raja

EXIT_SAPLV01Z_003 not executed and transaction MIGO display error

Hi,
I activated user exit EXIT_SAPLV01Z_003 and it is never executed on transaction MIGO. Also this transaction display an error message "ENTER BATCH".
Movement type 101 is set as manual and check in user exit.
<<some promises removed by moderator>>
Thanks
Edited by: kishan P on Oct 15, 2010 12:28 PM

Hi,
Check SAP Note 412562.
Sujay

Update qty in delivery note through bapi for migo

hi im using bapi for migo upload
my requiremnt is to update QTY IN DELIVERY NOTE in migo.
i got the folowing error if i dont pass the quantity.
qty and/0r delivery indicator or final issue indicator missing
if i pass the quantity field then it is changing quantity in unity of entity and qty in SKU i dnt want to change this field
here is my code,
gmcode-gm_code = '01'.
    ls_GOODSMVT_HEADER-pstng_date = tdate . "sy-datum.
    ls_GOODSMVT_HEADER-doc_date   = sy-datum.
    ls_GOODSMVT_HEADER-pr_uname   = sy-uname.
loop at itab.
ls_GOODSMVT_HEADER-REF_DOC_NO = itab-LFSNR.
it_goodsmvt-move_type = itab-BWART.
it_goodsmvt-po_number = itab-EBELN.
it_goodsmvt-PO_ITEM = '10'.
it_goodsmvt-STGE_LOC = itab-LGORT.
it_goodsmvt-QUANTITY = itab-LSMNG.
it_goodsmvt-BASE_UOM = 'KG'.
it_goodsmvt-material = 'RC1092'.
it_goodsmvt-entry_qnt = itab-LSMNG.
it_goodsmvt-ENTRY_UOM = 'KG'.
it_goodsmvt-mvt_ind = 'B'.
it_goodsmvt-plant = 'G001'.
it_goodsmvt-NO_MORE_GR = 'X'.
append it_goodsmvt.
clear it_goodsmvt.
CALL FUNCTION 'BAPI_GOODSMVT_CREATE'
EXPORTING
    goodsmvt_header               = ls_GOODSMVT_HEADER
    goodsmvt_code                 = gmcode-gm_code
TESTRUN                       = ' '
GOODSMVT_REF_EWM              =
IMPORTING
GOODSMVT_HEADRET              =
   MATERIALDOCUMENT              = lf_MATERIALDOCUMENT
   MATDOCUMENTYEAR               = lf_MATERIALDOCYEAR
tables
    goodsmvt_item                 = it_goodsmvt
GOODSMVT_SERIALNUMBER         =
    return                        = return
GOODSMVT_SERV_PART_DATA       =
EXTENSIONIN                   =
if return-type ca 'EA'.
      rollback work.
      message id '26' type 'I' number '000'
      with return-message.
    else.
      call function 'BAPI_TRANSACTION_COMMIT'
EXPORTING
WAIT          =
IMPORTING
RETURN        =
      wait up to 5 seconds.
    endif.
select * fROM mseg
      INTO CORRESPONDING FIELDS OF TABLE IT_MSEG
                         where mblnr = lf_MATERIALDOCUMENT and
                                   MJAHR = lf_MATERIALDOCYEAR.
LOOP AT IT_MSEG INTO WA_MSEG.
    IF WA_MSEG-LSMNG IS INITIAL.
      wa_mseg-lsmng = ITab-LSMNG.
      UPDATE MSEG from wa_mseg.
      commit work.
      wait up to 5 seconds.
    ENDIF.
ENDLOOP.
ENDLOOP.

It is been done by implementing one implicit enhancement in FM: MAP2I_B2017_GM_ITEM_TO_IMSEG
I have added the below functionality at the end of the function module.
Just i have maped the ERFMG i.e ent_qnt(Received quanity) with LSMNG i.e qty.in del note
All best for others.
$$-Start: (1)----
$$
ENHANCEMENT 1 Z_EV_IMP_GOODSMOVEMENT.    "active version
Populate the delivery note quantity and UoM
IF IMSEG-ERFMG IS NOT INITIAL.
MOVE IMSEG-ERFMG TO IMSEG-LSMNG.
MOVE IMSEG-ERFME TO IMSEG-LSMEH.
ENDIF.
ENDENHANCEMENT.
Thanks,
Mahesh.Gattu
Edited by: Maheshkumar gattu on Dec 3, 2010 4:35 PM

Higher education cess not posted while doing migo

Hi,
When I do goods receipt(MIGO) higher education cess is not posted to financial accounting. I am using taxinn.
I face same problem when i do excise invoice capturing for billing document. Balance in transaction currency.
rang

HI,
There is no relation ship between your tax procedure (eg: TAXINN) and withholding tax confirguration. Please check the does the higher education cess is getting posted or not when you post FI invoice. If it's fine, it should post when you do MIRO.
Withholding tax will not be posted when you do MIGO, it will be posted when you do MIRO only.
Please use the same vendor for FI & MM invoices posting. If still there is any issue in higher education cess posting - please check withholding tax configuration.
Regards,
Kiran Yelamarthy

Nota de remessa na MIGO

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for