OBIEE Performance with lakhs of records

Hi,
I have 4 laks records in my OBI Report. The default no of records for display is 25 in OBI.
When I try to expand it to all pages, the page gets struck and it is not displaying all the pages.
It does not respond and I need to manually kill he process via task manager.
What can be done here? If I enable the cache will it solve the purpose?
Ideally, How reports with lakhs of records are mainitained in OBI.
If i download the data , then I am able to see all records but still the size of the file is 120 MB.
Cant I manually see all the 4 lakh records in OBI witthout download? If I can, what needs to be done here?
Please help....

Hi,
Increase the ResultRowLimit in instanceconfig.xml file and check once.
Refer : http://obiee101.blogspot.com/2010/01/obiee-resultrowlimit.html
Regards,
Srikanth

Similar Messages

SCD 2 load performance with 60 millions records

Hey guys!
I'm wondering what would be the load performance for a type 2 SCD mapping based on the framework presented in the transformation guide (page A1-A20). The dimension has the following characteristics:
60 millions records
50 columns (including 17 to be tracked for changes)
Has anyone come across a similar case?
Mark or Igor- Is there any benchmark available on SCD 2 for large dimensions?
Any help would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks,
Rene

Rene,
It's really very difficult to guesstimate the loading time for a similar configuration. Too many parameters are missing, especially hardware. We are in the process of setting up some real benchmarks later this year - maybe you can give us some interesting scenarios.
On the other side, 50-60 million records is not that many these days... so I personally would consider anything more than several hours (on a half decent hardware) as too long.
Regards:
Igor

How to upload 15 lakhs of record onto ztable with performance

I have 15 to 20 lakhs of records in my internal table. I'm uploading it onto ztable in se11.
While doing so, it's taking lot of time.
I'm writing the following query:
MODIFY ZTABLE       FROM TABLE ITAB(INTERNAL TABLE NAME).
Please let me know if there is any other alternative which gives better performance.
Moderator message - Moved to the correct forum
Edited by: Rob Burbank on Feb 2, 2010 11:59 AM

Hi Rob,
just trace a
MODIFY ZTABLE FROM TABLE ITAB
with ST05 and you will see what the DBI / DB does with this statement.
If i remember right you are on DB6. Given current releases it migth be possible
that a MERGE (which can handle arrays) will be used instead of UPDATE / INSERT on
a row by row basis.
On most platforms the modify from table is done row by row like this:
UPDATE dbtab_row.
IF sy-subrc NE 0.
   INSERT dbtab_row.
   IF sy-subrc NE 0.
      UPDATE dbtab_row.
   ENDIF.
ENDIF.
if the rows exist you will only see updates.
if the rows don't exist you will see updates (no record) followed by an insert (1 record).
In rare cases you might see update (no record), insert (no record, somebody else inserted this record after the first update), update (1 record).
Kind regards,
Hermann

What init parameters will help with the OBIEE performance..?

Hi All
By any chance does any one have info on What init parameters will help with the OBIEE performance..?
Thanks

fast=true ;-)
What performance is causing you a problem? Data retrieval, general UI navigation? Its a massive area to cover. Can you be more specific?

Poor performance with WebI and BW hierarchy drill-down...

Hi
We are currently implementing a large HR solution with BW as backend
and WebI and Xcelcius as frontend. As part of this we are experiencing
very poor performance when doing drill-down in WebI on a BW hierarchy.
In general we are experiencing ok performance during selection of data
and traditional WebI filtering - however when using the BW hierarchy
for navigation within WebI, response times are significantly increasing.
The general solution setup are as follows:
1) Business Content version of the personnel administration
infoprovider - 0PA_C01. The Infoprovider contains 30.000 records
2) Multiprovider to act as semantic Data Mart layer in BW.
3) Bex Query to act as Data Mart Query and metadata exchange for BOE.
All key figure restrictions and calculations are done in this Data Mart
Query.
4) Traditionel BO OLAP universe 1:1 mapped to Bex Data Mart query. No
calculations etc. are done in the universe.
5) WebI report with limited objects included in the WebI query.
As we are aware that performance is an very subjective issues we have
created several case scenarios with different dataset sizes, various
filter criteria's and modeling techniques in BW.
Furthermore we have tried to apply various traditional BW performance
tuning techniques including aggregates, physical partitioning and pre-
calculation - all without any luck (pre-calculation doesn't seem to
work at all as WebI apparently isn't using the BW OLAP cache).
In general the best result we can get is with a completely stripped WebI report without any variables etc.
and a total dataset of 1000 records transferred to WebI. Even in this scenario we can't get
each navigational step (when using drill-down on Organizational Unit
hierarchy - 0ORGUNIT) to perform faster than minimum 15-20 seconds per.
navigational step.
That is each navigational step takes 15-20 seconds
with only 1000 records in the WebI cache when using drill-down on org.
unit hierachy !!.
Running the same Bex query from Bex Analyzer with a full dataset of
30.000 records on lowest level of detail returns a threshold of 1-2
seconds pr. navigational step thus eliminating that this should be a BW
modeling issue.
As our productive scenario obviously involves a far larger dataset as
well as separate data from CATS and PT infoproviders we are very
worried if we will ever be able to utilize hierarchy drill-down from
WebI ?.
The question is as such if there are any known performance issues
related to the use of BW hierarchy drill-down from WebI and if so are
there any ways to get around them ?.
As an alternative we are currently considering changing our reporting
strategy by creating several higher aggregated reports to avoid
hierarchy navigation at all. However we still need to support specific
division and their need to navigate the WebI dataset without
limitations which makes this issue critical.
Hope that you are able to help.
Thanks in advance
/Frank
Edited by: Mads Frank on Feb 1, 2010 9:41 PM

Hi Henry, thank you for your suggestions although i´m not agree with you that 20 seconds is pretty good for that navigation step. The same query executed with BEx Analyzer takes only 1-2 seconds to do the drill down.
Actions
suppress unassigned nodes in RSH1: Magic!! This was the main problem!!
tick use structure elements in RSRT: Done it.
enable query stripping in WebI: Done it.
upgrade your BW to SP09: Has the SP09 some inprovements in relation to this point ?
use more runtime query filters. : Not possible. Very simple query.
Others:
RSRT combination H-1-3-3-1 (Expand nodes/Permanent Cache BLOB)
Uncheck prelimirary Hierarchy presentation in Query. only selected.
Check "Use query drill" in webi properties.
Sorry for this mixed message but when i was answering i tryied what you suggest in relation with supress unassigned nodes and it works perfectly. This is what is cusing the bottleneck!! incredible...
Thanks a lot
J.Casas

Getting error Unable to perform transaction on the record.

Hi,
My requirement is to implement the custom attachment, and to store the data into custom lob table.
my custom table structure is similer to that of standard fnd_lobs table and have inserted the data through EO based VO.
Structure of custom table
CREATE TABLE XXAPL.XXAPL_LOBS
ATTACHMENT_ID NUMBER NOT NULL,
FILE_NAME VARCHAR2(256 BYTE),
FILE_CONTENT_TYPE VARCHAR2(256 BYTE) NOT NULL,
FILE_DATA BLOB,
UPLOAD_DATE DATE,
EXPIRATION_DATE DATE,
PROGRAM_NAME VARCHAR2(32 BYTE),
PROGRAM_TAG VARCHAR2(32 BYTE),
LANGUAGE VARCHAR2(4 BYTE) DEFAULT ( userenv ( 'LANG') ),
ORACLE_CHARSET VARCHAR2(30 BYTE) DEFAULT ( substr ( userenv ( 'LANGUAGE') , instr ( userenv ( 'LANGUAGE') , '.') +1 ) ),
FILE_FORMAT VARCHAR2(10 BYTE) NOT NULL
i have created a simple messegefileupload and submit button on my custom page and written below code on CO:
Process Request Code:
if(!pageContext.isBackNavigationFired(false))
TransactionUnitHelper.startTransactionUnit(pageContext, "AttachmentCreateTxn");
if(!pageContext.isFormSubmission()){
System.out.println("In ProcessRequest of AplAttachmentCO");
am.invokeMethod("initAplAttachment");
else
if(!TransactionUnitHelper.isTransactionUnitInProgress(pageContext, "AttachmentCreateTxn", true))
OADialogPage dialogPage = new OADialogPage(NAVIGATION_ERROR);
pageContext.redirectToDialogPage(dialogPage);
ProcessFormRequest Code:
if (pageContext.getParameter("Upload") != null)
DataObject fileUploadData = (DataObject)pageContext.getNamedDataObject("FileItem");
String strFileName = null;
strFileName = pageContext.getParameter("FileItem");
if(strFileName == null || "".equals(strFileName))
throw new OAException("Please select a File for upload");
fileName = strFileName;
contentType = (String)fileUploadData.selectValue(null, "UPLOAD_FILE_MIME_TYPE");
BlobDomain uploadedByteStream = (BlobDomain)fileUploadData.selectValue(null, fileName);
String strItemDescr = pageContext.getParameter("ItemDesc");
OAFormValueBean bean = (OAFormValueBean)webBean.findIndexedChildRecursive("AttachmentId");
String strAttachId = (String)bean.getValue(pageContext);
System.out.println("Attachment Id:" +strAttachId);
int aInt = Integer.parseInt(strAttachId);
Number numAttachId = new Number(aInt);
Serializable[] methodParams = {fileName, contentType , uploadedByteStream , strItemDescr , numAttachId};
Class[] methodParamTypes = {fileName.getClass(), contentType.getClass() , uploadedByteStream.getClass() , strItemDescr.getClass() , numAttachId.getClass()};
am.invokeMethod("setUploadFileRowData", methodParams, methodParamTypes);
am.invokeMethod("apply");
System.out.println("Records committed in lobs table");
if (pageContext.getParameter("AddAnother") != null)
pageContext.forwardImmediatelyToCurrentPage(null,
true, // retain AM
OAWebBeanConstants.ADD_BREAD_CRUMB_YES);
if (pageContext.getParameter("cancel") != null)
am.invokeMethod("rollbackShipment");
TransactionUnitHelper.endTransactionUnit(pageContext, "AttachmentCreateTxn");
Code in AM:
public void apply(){
getTransaction().commit();
public void initAplAttachment() {
OAViewObject lobsvo = (OAViewObject)getAplLobsAttachVO1();
if (!lobsvo.isPreparedForExecution())
lobsvo.executeQuery();
Row row = lobsvo.createRow();
lobsvo.insertRow(row);
row.setNewRowState(Row.STATUS_INITIALIZED);
public void setUploadFileRowData(String fName, String fContentType, BlobDomain fileData , String fItemDescr , Number fAttachId)
AplLobsAttachVOImpl VOImpl = (AplLobsAttachVOImpl)getAplLobsAttachVO1();
System.out.println("In setUploadFileRowData method");
System.out.println("In setUploadFileRowData method fAttachId: "+fAttachId);
System.out.println("In setUploadFileRowData method fName: "+fName);
System.out.println("In setUploadFileRowData method fContentType: "+fContentType);
RowSetIterator rowIter = VOImpl.createRowSetIterator("rowIter");
while (rowIter.hasNext())
AplLobsAttachVORowImpl viewRow = (AplLobsAttachVORowImpl)rowIter.next();
viewRow.setFileContentType(fContentType);
viewRow.setFileData(fileData);
viewRow.setFileFormat("IGNORE");
viewRow.setFileName(fName);
rowIter.closeRowSetIterator();
System.out.println("setting on fndlobs done");
The attchemnt id is the sequence generated number, and its defaulting logic is written in EO
public void create(AttributeList attributeList) {
super.create(attributeList);
OADBTransaction transaction = getOADBTransaction();
Number attachmentId = transaction.getSequenceValue("xxapl_po_ship_attch_s");
setAttachmentId(attachmentId);
public void setAttachmentId(Number value) {
System.out.println("In ShipmentsEOImpl value::"+value);
if (getAttachmentId() != null)
System.out.println("In AplLobsAttachEOImpl AttachmentId::"+(Number)getAttachmentId());
throw new OAAttrValException(OAException.TYP_ENTITY_OBJECT,
getEntityDef().getFullName(), // EO name
getPrimaryKey(), // EO PK
"AttachmentId", // Attribute Name
value, // Attribute value
"AK", // Message product short name
"FWK_TBX_T_EMP_ID_NO_UPDATE"); // Message name
if (value != null)
// Attachment ID must be unique. To verify this, you must check both the
// entity cache and the database. In this case, it's appropriate
// to use findByPrimaryKey() because you're unlikely to get a match, and
// and are therefore unlikely to pull a bunch of large objects into memory.
// Note that findByPrimaryKey() is guaranteed to check all AplLobsAttachment.
// First it checks the entity cache, then it checks the database.
OADBTransaction transaction = getOADBTransaction();
Object[] attachmentKey = {value};
EntityDefImpl attachDefinition = AplLobsAttachEOImpl.getDefinitionObject();
AplLobsAttachEOImpl attachment =
(AplLobsAttachEOImpl)attachDefinition.findByPrimaryKey(transaction, new Key(attachmentKey));
if (attachment != null)
throw new OAAttrValException(OAException.TYP_ENTITY_OBJECT,
getEntityDef().getFullName(), // EO name
getPrimaryKey(), // EO PK
"AttachmentId", // Attribute Name
value, // Attribute value
"AK", // Message product short name
"FWK_TBX_T_EMP_ID_UNIQUE"); // Message name
setAttributeInternal(ATTACHMENTID, value);
Issue faced:
When i run the page for the first time data gets inserted into custom table perfectly on clicking upload button,
but when clicked on add another button on the same page (which basically redirects to the same upload page and increments the attachment id by 1)
i am getting the below error:
Error
Unable to perform transaction on the record.
Cause: The record contains stale data. The record has been modified by another user.
Action: Cancel the transaction and re-query the record to get the new data.
Have spent entire day to resolve this issue but no luck.
Any help on this will be appreciated, let me know if i am going wrong anywhere.
Thanks nd Regards
Avinash

Hi,
After, inserting the values please re-execute the VO query.
Also, try to redirect the page with no AM retension
Thanks,
Gaurav

Infotype to link Personnel Number with Vendor Master Record

Hi All,
pls help me what infotype to link Personnel Number with Vendor Master Record in AP module.
Customer require when Create Employee then system automatic gernerate Vendor Master.
pls help us.
Thanks

Hi,
PRAA works absolutely fine. I have external number range for vendors.
There is an option so that you can create HR accounts in vendor accounts
Path:Accounting> Financial accounting>Travel
management>Personal-Related Master Data> Create Vendors (tr.code PRAA)
Look at this description:
From the HR master data, this program creates a batch input session for
maintaining person-specific vendor master records.
The report can process vendor master records as follows:
o Initial set up (create/add missing company code segment)
o Uupdate (change completely according to vendor and HR reference)
o Change (only according to HR master data, for example, name
Block
The following infotypes from HR master data are taken into account for
the key date specified:
o Actions (Infotype 0000)
o Organizational Assignment (Infotype 0001)
o Personal Data (Infotype 0002)
o Permanent Residence (Infotype 0006 Subtype 1)
o Bank Details (Infotype 0009 Subtype 0 or 2)
All other required data is taken from a reference vendor that you can
specify as a parameter when you start the program. Note that for the
reference vendor, reference data must exist for all company codes that
are applicable according to HR master data. Since program RPRAPA00 cannot
assign vendor master record numbers externally when creating
vendor master records, you must be sure that the reference vendor is
assigned to an account group that requires internal number assignment.
If no house bank is specified in the reference vendor, this is
determined via feature TRVHB (Implementation guide for 'Travel Expenses'
-> Transfer to Data Medium Exchange -> Set up Feature for Determining
House Bank according to the employee's organizational situation.
The link between the HR employee's master record and the corresponding
vendor master record is set up by entering the personnel number in the
company code segment of the vendor master record.
General program flow
Program RPRAPA00 creates a sequential work file in the specified
directory. Ensure that you use a global directory that can be accessed
by all application servers; a directory is automatically proposed. The
work file is later transformed into a batch input session by the
subsequent program RFBIKR00, which is started automatically.
In test run mode this program delivers information messages which
document the creation of a batch input session. Since each information
message must be confirmed manually, the test run should only be
performed for a small number of personnel numbers.
In productive run mode, however, the program RFBIKR00 is automatically
started as a job; the information mentioned above is stored in the job
log in this case.
Initial setup of vendor master records
Corresponding vendor master records are created from the infotypes
listed above and the non-HR-specific information from the reference
vendor. During the process, the personnel number is stored in the
company code segment of the vendor master record. Persons who already
have a vendor master record with corresponding personnel number are
rejected in this run.
If a vendor master record already exists for a personnel number, but
without a company code segment for the company code in which the
employee exists at the key date entered, the program adds the required
company code segment to the vendor master record. You must however
activate the checkbox "Create new company code segment for existing
vendor master records".
The HR master data used is the info type record valid on the key date
entered.
Update of vendor master records
The corresponding vendor master records are updated from the infotypes
listed above and the non-HR-specific information from the reference
vendor. Persons who already have a vendor master record with
corresponding personnel number are rejected in this run. The system uses
HR master data from the infotype records valid for the key date.
Change vendor master records according to HR master data
All HR-specific data is changed in the vendor master records for
personnel numbers that have changes since the date recorded under '...
with last change since'. The system uses HR master data again from the
infotype records valid for the key date specified.
Block vendor master records
All vendor master records which correspond with the selected personnel
numbers are blocked for posting.
User exits
For the following situations, two empty routines are supplied in the
includes RPRAPAEX and RPRAPAEX&H5F001 which you can adapt to your
requirements.
o The employee's last name is entered in the sort field in the vendor
master record. If you do not want this to happen, you can program
the situation you want in the user exit routine
'set&H5Fmc&H5Ffield&H5Fby&H5Fuser'.
o If the address editing in the vendor master record does not suit
your requirements, it can also be changed. For this purpose you have
the user exit routine 'set&H5Faddress&H5Fby&H5Fuser'.
o If you want to assign numbers to the vendor master records to be
created via external number assignment (for example, vendor master
record number &H3D personnel number), you can adjust the user exit
routing 'SET&H5FVENDOR&H5FNO&H5FBY&H5FUSER' (in include RPRAPAEX&H5F00). Note
that
the account group of the reference vendor must also have external
number assignment.
Note that in each case a thorough knowledge of the programming
language
ABAP/4 is necessary.
Set up vendor master records in a separate system
The distribution of personnel master data from a HR system to an FI
system is a prerequisite for creating, changing, and blocking vendor
master records.
In the section Master Data Distribution (link to separate HR unit) of
the ALE IMG, an explanation is given regarding the way in which the
FI
System is supplied with the relevant employee data from the HR System
In the FI System, report RPRAPA00 described here can be used to
create,
change, and block vendor master records.
Other wise try with VPE1 t.code.
Regards
Devi

Planfunction in IP or with BW modelling - case with 15 million records

Hi,
we need to implement a simple planfunction (qty * price) which has to be executed for 15 million records at a time (qty of 15 million records multiplied with average price calculated on a higher level). I'd like to still implement this with a simple FOX formula but are fearing the performance, given the number of records. Does anyone has experience with this number of records. Would you suggest to do this within IP or using BW modelling. The maximum lead time accepted is 24 hours for this planfunction ...
The planfunction is expected to be executed in a batch or background mode, but should be triggered from an IP input query and not using RSPC for example...
please advise.
D

Hi Dries,
using BI IP you should definitely do a partition via planning sequence in a process chain, cf.
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw70ehp1/helpdata/en/45/946677f8fb0cf2e10000000a114a6b/frameset.htm
Planning functions load the requested data into main memory, with 15 million records you will have a problem. In addition it is not a good idea to emply only one work process with the whole work (a planning function uses only one work process). So partition the problem to be able to use parallelization.
Process chains can be triggered via an API, cf. function group RSPC_API. So you can easily start a process chain via a planning function.
Regards,
Gregor

B1 and SQL Server 2005 performance with 3.000.000 invoice-lines per year

I would like to know if SAP Business One with SQL Server 2005 could work with the following information:
- 40.000 Business Partners
- 40.000 Invoices per month
- Aprox. 3.000.000 invoice-lines per year
Of course it will be necessary to change some forms in B1.
What do you think?
Do you know any B1 customer working with that amout of data?

> Hi,
>
> I think a good SQL2005 tuning (done by a good DBA)
> will improve performance. Number of records like that
> shouldn't hurt that kind of DB engine...
Hi,
I'm sure that MSSQL2005 can handle the amount of records & transactions in question. Even MSSQL 2000 can do it. However, any DB engine can be put on its knees with the combination of 2-tier application architecture and badly designed queries. B1 is a case in point. I wouldn't go into such a project without decent preliminary load testing and explicit commitment for support from SAP B1 dev team.
I have heard from implementation projects where B1 simply couldn't handle the amount of data. I've also participated in some presales cases for B1 where we decided not to take a project because we saw that B1 couldn't handle the amount of data (while the other features of B1 would have been more than enough for the customer). The one you're currently looking at seems like one of those.
Henry

Can I use Solaris with my Home Recording Studio?

Hello,
I am currently building a basic home recording studio. I recently assembled a new computer and will be purchasing music recording equipment very soon. Before I purchase the audio recording gear, I was curious about a few things pertaining to the use of Solaris as my possible choice system.
The data that I store on my hard drives will need to be secure. I had originally considered RAID 5 though recently found out about RAID Z, which appears to be far ahead of the other RAIDs. I am curious to know more about how to set up a RAID Z system.
The computer will be running Solaris, various Linux or BSD, and Windows Vista. I have 500GB x4 hard drives. I am considering separating one and using it strictly for Vista, and using the remaining 3 with a RAID set-up for nix. If I had a choice, I would put much less hard drive space into Vista (capping it at 150 to 200 GB), though I have yet to come across a RAID system that effectively or efficiently cooperates cross-platform. With that in mind, the majority of the remaining 1.5TB can go into my studio OS - hopefully Solaris - while left-over hard drive space is set aside for various other *nix.
I've used Solaris 10 before, though haven't really gone into detail on the mechanics of such features as ZFS, zones, now RAID Z, and the many more amazing features that Solaris provides. Likewise, I am not really familiar with how well the system might operate with software/applications that I could use for recording and composing music.
Beyond the available 2TB (or 1.5TB RAID-ready) space, my computer is running on a new 64-bit quad-core AMD CPU (~2.6GHz) and currently has 4GB 1066MHz RAM. In my search for preparing a computer that suits me for high performance recording - including the editing and mastering of audio - I am attempting to narrow down my options on the software side of things. I have been very satisfied with the general file management of Solaris, though am unsure of how well it might run as the software side of a home recording studio. An additional factor in deciding will be the software's compatbility with audio PCI cards and external recording/audio interfaces. There is always a question of whether or not the necessary drivers, firmware, or similar is available between any given hardware and software components.
Some other *nix options I have considered - "Ubuntu Studio 64-bit" (though it appears to prefer 32-bit) and "64 Studio" (also Debian-based, though appears to be optimized for 64-bit). Some colleagues have used Gentoo with studio applications, though I don't know of any Linux distributions that offer the versatility, power, stability, and efficiency of Solaris for the operating system that it is.
If I use something like "64 Studio", I will have the advantage of a system that is ready-built for studio recording purposes as well as a system that I know is compatible with the sound gear that I am considering purchasing. However, those systems are restricted by their file system types, RAID availability and dependability, and the general disadvantages of using the Linux kernel in general. (I enjoy Linux, though I admittedly prefer Unix over it.)
Can I use Solaris with my home recording studio?
Thank you!
Edited by: the_professor on Nov 9, 2008 6:26 PM
Corrected a typo.
Edited by: the_professor on Nov 9, 2008 6:30 PM
Caught another typo.

I'm not sure what your question is. If you have particular software you want to run, you should see what you can get that package to run under. Sound hw stuff don't tend to be too portable unless it's written on top of OSS (htttp://www.opensound.com). Were I you, I'd consider separating out the storage part and the processing part. Get something like a cheap dell sc440 to be a file server and give the drives to that (unless you actually can get all the components working under solaris).
-r

How to synchronize video camera with logic for recording?

Hi guys,
I have a Sony VX 2000 and logic pro.
I'd like to do a multitrack audio recording of a musical theatre performance and simultaneously record video with two cameras.
I want to record the sound into logic pro, that way I can mix the sound later (multitrack audio).
At the same time I want to record video with the cameras.
There may be 100 takes or more....
What is the best way to synchronize logic with the video recording?
I don't want to synchronize each audio take with each video take later, there must be an easiser way!
Is it possible to start recording of video and audio at exact the same time?
Do I need any additional hardware?
Any feedback highly appreciated!
Thanks Eddie

Have the drummer make a 2 pop (click) at the beginning of every take.
Set the camera to 16 bit audio and you can import the camera audio into Logic.
Record multitrack into Logic at the same time.
You can align the takes to the audible click.
Sorry, It's the only thing I can think of,
without having very expensive externally synced cameras.
Logic doesn't record video, it plays it back.
So making some type of slate is the way to go.
It will be a pain to manually align all that stuff.

Initial loading with less added record in a cube

Hi Everybody,
I have loaded a Initial delta into a cube. in that cube there are more than one lakh entries are transfered, but only 30,000 records are added, i donot know why it happened? how can i solved? help me...

Hi Jaya,
It is not a problem with no of records
as cube is aggregates the key figure value.
match the infocube data with PSA........if u find any missing records then debug the routines........

Query Performance with Exception aggregation

Hello,
My Query Keyfigures has exception aggregation on order line level as per requirement.
Currently cube holds 5M of records, when we run query its running more than 30min.
We cont remove exception aggregation.
Cube is alredy modeled correctly and we dont want to use the cache.
Does anybody can please advice if there is any other better approach to improve query performance with exception agg?
Thanks

Hi,
We have the same problem and raised an OSS ticket. They replied us with the note 1257455 which offers all ways of improving performance in such cases. I guess there s nothing else to do, but to precalculate this exception aggregated formula in data model via transformations or ABAP.
By the way, cache can not help you in this case since exc. agg. is calculated after cache retrieval.
Hope this helps,
Sunil

Stage Performance with 2408 audio interface

Stage Performance with 2408 audio interface
a)I need to set a playlist with my 80 projects in front of me, ready to play and with a minimum loading time every time I select a new song to perform.
Each of my logic project has about 30 audio instrument tracks and 10 audio instrument tracks with many plug in.
I consider buying On Stage but the software only takes 20 projects at the time.
Is it possible to program more than one on stage software in the same computer and to program my 80 Logic projects?
I don't want to learn how to use Ablaton live, now I am finally comfortable with Logic.
b)About the loading time and the computer CPU:
1) what would be the best deal to avoid the loading time between the songs: I can bounce my 50 tracks to a 4 stereo audio tracks, create a new project with these 4 audio instrument track to make faster or
2) I can just leave the project with the original tracks but even with my Mac book Pro 2.4 GHZ, the computer crashes sometime because too many effects and tracks. (2 GB ram)
Please if you have an idea, I would appreciate a lot!!
Thank you in advance.
John

An external audio interface will not make a significant difference to the CPU strain. All it might do is improve the quality of your output signal. It will also not improve (or alter) the intrinsic audio quality of a bounce, unless there are external hardware synths/modules involved.
In the best case scenario (high end interfaces) the latency might drop a few milliseconds.
If you do not record audio, you can turn off software monitoring.
I also have the Lush, it's a lovely synth, but also a CPU-hog that can pretty easily overload the one CPU-core it is processed on.
What often helps with these synths is to turn off any FX (delay, chorus reverb, etc) that are built into the synth, and use Logics plugins as inserts on the channel strip. Also, turning off FX on synths reveals the actual ("virgin") honest sound of the synth itself.

Report performance with Hierarchies

Hi
How to improve query performance with hierarchies. We have to do lot of navigation's in the query and the volume of data size very big.
Thanks
P G

HI,
chk this:
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/servlet/prt/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/1955ba90-0201-0010-d3aa-8b2a4ef6bbb2
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/servlet/prt/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/ce7fb368-0601-0010-64ba-fadc985a1f94
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/servlet/prt/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/4c0ab590-0201-0010-bd9a-8332d8b4f09c
Query Performance Is "Aggregates" the way out for me?
/people/vikash.agrawal/blog/2006/04/17/query-performance-150-is-aggregates-the-way-out-for-me
° the OLAP cache is architected to store query result sets and to give all users access to those result sets.
If a user executes a query, the result set for that querys request can be stored in the OLAP cache; if that same query (or a derivative) is then executed by another user, the subsequent query request can be filled by accessing the result set already stored in the OLAP cache.
In this way, a query request filled from the OLAP cache is significantly faster than queries that receive their result set from database access
° The indexes that are created in the fact table for each dimension allow you to easily find and select the data
see http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/80/1a6473e07211d2acb80000e829fbfe/content.htm
° when you load data into the InfoCube, each request has its own request ID, which is included in the fact table in the packet dimension.
This (besides giving the possibility to manage/delete single request) increases the volume of data, and reduces performance in reporting, as the system has to aggregate with the request ID every time you execute a query. Using compressing, you can eliminate these disadvantages, and bring data from different requests together into one single request (request ID 0).
This function is critical, as the compressed data can no longer be deleted from the InfoCube using its request IDs and, logically, you must be absolutely certain that the data loaded into the InfoCube is correct.
see http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/ca/aa6437e7a4080ee10000009b38f842/content.htm
° by using partitioning you can split up the whole dataset for an InfoCube into several, smaller, physically independent and redundancy-free units. Thanks to this separation, performance is increased when reporting, or also when deleting data from the InfoCube.
see http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/33/dc2038aa3bcd23e10000009b38f8cf/content.htm
Hope it helps!
tHAK YOU,
dst

OBIEE Performance with lakhs of records

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for