OBIEE RSUM() with partition by

Hi All,
Can anyone suggest me that how to get the below result in OBIEE:
Row Number Title Date
1 ABC 1/1/2012
1 ABC 1/2/2012
2 DEF 1/1/2012
3 GHI 4/1/2012
Currently I am using RSUM() and only able to get the below result which is not my expected result:
Row Number Title Date
1 ABC 1/1/2012
2 ABC 1/2/2012
3 DEF 1/1/2012
4 GHI 4/1/2012
I want to get the running distinct number of title instead of getting the running number of all records.
Any help would be appreciated. Many thanks.
Thanks & Regards,
Benard

Hi SVee,
Thanks for the reply. I have tried your suggestion but it is only partially working.
I have use suppress and use count(title) function and it shows below result:
Row Number Title Date
1 ABC 1/1/2012
ABC 1/2/2012
1 DEF 1/1/2012
1 GHI 4/1/2012
If I add in RCOUNT(title) function, it will still shows:
Row Number Title Date
1 ABC 1/1/2012
2 ABC 1/2/2012
3 DEF 1/1/2012
4 GHI 4/1/2012
I even set suppress to Title column as well, but it just didn't work well.
Thanks & Regards,
Benard

Similar Messages

  • OBIEE 11G with MySql Issue Hierarchy is not working..

    Hi,
    i am using the OBIEE 11G with MySQL DB. i have sucessfully created the RPD. i created the Hierarchy in the RPD. this is the scerario i have created.
    i have only one data column created_at. by using this column i create 3 more logical logical columns, which are Year,Month Name,Week and created Hierarchy by taking the these columns only.
    when i am viewing the result by taking the hierarchy it throwing the error systax error"ou have an error in your SQL syntax; check the manual that corresponds to your MySQL server version".
    but we selecting the year column it successfully nagvigating to the month level data but when selecting the Hierarchy directly it is unable to navigate from year to month.
    please provide me the solution for this as soon as possbile i have an urgent requirement on this.
    Thanks,
    Yogi.

    Hi,
    Thanks for you post..
    My Requriement is that we no need to create new columns we need to necessary columns in BMM layer only and we need to use them in Hierarchy.
    Thanks,
    Yogi.

  • Error while integrating OBIEE report with EBS using Rich Content Container

    I am trying to integrate OBIEE report with EBS using Rich Content Container OAF functionality. I have followed the steps mentioned in oracle Note - Embedding Analytics in Oracle E-Business Suite [ID 974422.1]. When i run my page, the container region comes up with the error message - The requested URL /pls/ghrfpkd2/OracleSSWA.Execute was not found on this server. Can someone please help me with some documents on the steps to integrate OBIEE with EBS using Rich Content Container.

    I'm getting the same error on WebSphere 6.1.5. Is there any solution for this?

  • Sum Aggregation Error in Physical & BMM Layer in OBIEE 11g with Essbase 11

    Hi everyone,
    I'm using OBIEE 11g with Essbase 11 as the data source. I'm using Sample Basic database from the Essbase as my data source. If I'm using the hierarchy for the measures (so I don't flatten the measures), and when I changed the aggregation in both physical and BMM layer from Aggregate_External to Sum, I can't create a report at all from the Answers.
    Does anyone encounter the same thing? Any ideas/solution about this? Please help.
    Thanks a lot!

    Hi Deepak,
    When I picked the "Basic - measure" alone, I got this error.
    Error Codes: OPR4ONWY:U9IM8TAC:OI2DL65P
    State: HY000. Code: 10058. [NQODBC] [SQL_STATE: HY000] [nQSError: 10058] A general error has occurred. [nQSError: 43113] Message returned from OBIS. [nQSError: 43119] Query Failed: [nQSError: 96002] Essbase Error: Unknown Member Basic - measure used in query (HY000)
    SQL Issued: SELECT 0 s_0, "Sample Basic"."Basic"."Basic - measure" s_1 FROM "Sample Basic".
    When I picked the "Gen1,Measures" alone from the measure dimension, I got this error:
    Error Codes: OPR4ONWY:U9IM8TAC:OI2DL65P
    State: HY000. Code: 10058. [NQODBC] [SQL_STATE: HY000] [nQSError: 10058] A general error has occurred. [nQSError: 43113] Message returned from OBIS. [nQSError: 43119] Query Failed: [nQSError: 46008] Internal error: File server\Query\Optimizer\ServiceInterfaceMgr\SIMDB\Src\SQOIMDXGeneratorGeneric.cpp, line 2610. (HY000)
    SQL Issued: SELECT 0 s_0, "Sample Basic"."Measures"."Gen1,Measures" s_1, SORTKEY("Sample Basic"."Measures"."Gen1,Measures") s_2 FROM "Sample Basic"
    But when I queried the dimensions one by one (only single dimension each), no error was shown.
    This only happens if I use Sum in the physical and BMM layer. If I use External_Aggregation, these errors do not happen. And if I flatten the measures, these errors also do not happen.

  • Table creation with partition

    following is the table creation script with partition
    CREATE TABLE customer_entity_temp (
    BRANCH_ID NUMBER (4),
    ACTIVE_FROM_YEAR VARCHAR2 (4),
    ACTIVE_FROM_MONTH VARCHAR2 (3),
    partition by range (ACTIVE_FROM_YEAR,ACTIVE_FROM_MONTH)
    (partition yr7_1999 values less than ('1999',TO_DATE('Jul','Mon')),
    partition yr12_1999 values less than ('1999',TO_DATE('Dec','Mon')),
    it gives an error
    ORA-14036: partition bound value too large for column
    but if I increase the size of the ACTIVE_FROM_MONTH column to 9 , the script works and creates the table. Why is it so ?
    Also, by creating a table in this way and populating the table data in their respective partitions, all rows with month less than "JULY" will go in yr7_1999 partition and all rows with month value between "JUL" and "DEC" will go in the second partition yr12_1999 , where will the data with month value equal to "DEC" go?
    Plz help me in solving this problem
    thanks n regards
    Moloy

    Hi,
    You declared ACTIVE_FROM_MONTH VARCHAR2 (3) and you try to check it against a date in your partitionning clause:TO_DATE('Jul','Mon')so you should first check your data model and what you are trying to achieve exactly.
    With such a partition decl, you will not be able to insert dates from december 1998 included and onward. The values are stricly less than (<) not less or equal(<=) hence such lines can't be inserted. I'd advise you to check the MAXVALUE value jocker and the ENABLE ROW MOVEMENT partitionning clause.
    Regards,
    Yoann.

  • OBIEE 11g with Oracle EBS R12 implementation,Need to know Default Roles

    Hi All,
    Can anyone please let me know regarding any documentation or link where i can find all default OBIEE Group names and the relation of each Groups with Oracle EBS R12 roles and responsibility categorized by the Modules.
    We need the Roles information for the following modules:
    1. Supply Chain & Order Management
    2. Procurement & spend
    3. Finance
    Thanks in advance. Please help.
    Regards
    Sudipta

    Please see these docs.
    Integrating Oracle Business Intelligence Applications with Oracle E-Business Suite [ID 555254.1]
    What documentation do I need to review when installing and configuring a OBI Apps 7.9.6.x environment with EBS? [ID 1221764.1]
    Master Note for OBIEE Integration issues with EBS, Siebel, SSO, Portal Server [ID 1248939.1]
    Oracle SSO E-Business Suite Applications Integration with Oracle Business Intelligence [ID 553423.1]
    Oracle EBS integration with OBIEE [ID 733137.1]
    Document for implementing security OBIEE Apps with EBS and Siebel CRM as sources [ID 756851.1]
    What Application must be chosen for Responsibility within EBS when integrating with OBIEE [ID 1246464.1]
    Also, search Steven Chan's Blog and you should get couple of hits -- http://blogs.oracle.com/stevenChan/
    Thanks,
    Hussein

  • ORA-00604 ORA-00904 When query partitioned table with partitioned indexes

    Got ORA-00604 ORA-00904 When query partitioned table with partitioned indexes in the data warehouse environment.
    Query runs fine when query the partitioned table without partitioned indexes.
    Here is the query.
    SELECT al2.vdc_name, al7.model_series_name, COUNT (DISTINCT (al1.vin)),
    al27.accessory_code
    FROM vlc.veh_vdc_accessorization_fact al1,
    vlc.vdc_dim al2,
    vlc.model_attribute_dim al7,
    vlc.ppo_list_dim al18,
    vlc.ppo_list_indiv_type_dim al23,
    vlc.accy_type_dim al27
    WHERE ( al2.vdc_id = al1.vdc_location_id
    AND al7.model_attribute_id = al1.model_attribute_id
    AND al18.mydppolist_id = al1.ppo_list_id
    AND al23.mydppolist_id = al18.mydppolist_id
    AND al23.mydaccytyp_id = al27.mydaccytyp_id
    AND ( al7.model_series_name IN ('SCION TC', 'SCION XA', 'SCION XB')
    AND al2.vdc_name IN
    ('PORT OF BALTIMORE',
    'PORT OF JACKSONVILLE - LEXUS',
    'PORT OF LONG BEACH',
    'PORT OF NEWARK',
    'PORT OF PORTLAND'
    AND al27.accessory_code IN ('42', '43', '44', '45')
    GROUP BY al2.vdc_name, al7.model_series_name, al27.accessory_code

    I would recommend that you post this at the following OTN forum:
    Database - General
    General Database Discussions
    and perhaps at:
    Oracle Warehouse Builder
    Warehouse Builder
    The Oracle OLAP forum typically does not cover general data warehousing topics.

  • Using AGO function with partitions

    I have a situation where we have logical sources with the same repository folder that are partitioned. We would like to use the AGO function but are getting the following error:
    State: HY000. Code: 10058. [NQODBC] [SQL_STATE: HY000] [nQSError: 10058] A general error has occurred. [nQSError: 22042] AGO function may not be used on '# Applied Invoices' because its source is horizontally partitioned. (HY000)
    Has anyone had success using the AGO function with partitions? If not, do you have an alternate solution to the problem?

    AGO doesn't work with partitions - it's documented on metalink....there's an enhancement request , but that's it - no work-around provided....I'd suggest creating a common view for that particular report

  • DATACOPY with partitioned data source

    Hello,
    I am actually working on the Hyperion Essbase EPM 11.1.2
    I am trying to perform a Datacopy command in a HBR.
    Data source are partitioned with a transparent partition.
    This datacopy do not work. The HBR is really fast but when I retrieve data no data are copied.
    I am wondering if this is possible to perform a datacopy command, in a HBR with partitioned data source.
    I have managed to perform this datacopy throw a HBR using the command:
    SET CREATEBLOCKONEQ
    Target = Source;
    But this method is really long.
    Thanks for your answer,
    Arthur.

    Hi
    Make sure that you have relevant Role & Authorization at Quality/PRS.
    You have to Transport the Source Cube first and then Create a Generate Export Data Source in QAS. Then, replicate data sources for BW QAS Soruce System. Make sure this replicated Data Source in QAS. Only then can transport new update rules for second cube.
    Hope it helps and clear

  • Troubles editing tables with partitions

    I'm running SQL Developer 1.5.3 against Oracle 10/11 databases and SQL Developer has trouble with my partitioned tables. Both the schema owner and sys users experience the same problems.
    The first time I try to edit a table, I get an "Error Loading Objects" dialog with a NullPointException message. If I immediately turn around and try to edit the table again, I get the Edit Table dialog. That's annoying but there's at least a work-around.
    Next, if I select the Indexes pane, I can view the first index but selecting another one results in an "Index Error on <table>" error dialog. The message is "There are no table partitions on which to define local index partitions". At this point, selecting any of the other panes (Columns, Primary Key, etc.) results in the same dialog. While the main Partitions tab shows my partitions, I cannot see them in the Edit Table dialog. In fact, the Partition Definitions and Subpartition Templates panes are blank.
    Does anyone else see this behavior? Version 1.5.1 behaved the same way so it's not new.
    Of course I've figured out how to do everything I need through SQL but it would be handy if I could just use the tool.
    Thank you.

    Most of my tables are generated from a script so this morning I decided to just create a very basic partitioned table. It contained a NUMBER primary key and a TIMESTAMP(6) column to use with partitioning. That table worked just fine in SQL Developer.
    At that point I tried to figure out what is different about my tables and I finally found the difference... Oracle Spatial. If I add an MDSYS.SDO_GEOMETRY column to my partitioned table, SQL Developer starts having issues.
    I also have the GeoRaptor plugin installed so I had to wonder if it was interfering with SQL Developer. I couldn't find an option to uninstall an extension so I went into the sqldeveloper/extensions directory and removed GeoRaptorLibs and org.GeoRaptor.jar. GeoRaptor doesn't appear to be installed in SQL Developer anymore but I still see the same behavior.
    It appears that there is an issue in SQL Developer with Oracle Spatial and partitioning. Can someone confirm this?

  • Insert performance issue with Partitioned Table.....

    Hi All,
    I have a performance issue during with a table which is partitioned. without table being partitioned
    it ran in less time but after partition it took more than double.
    1) The table was created initially without any partition and the below insert took only 27 minuts.
    Total Rec Inserted :- 2424233
    PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
    Elapsed: 00:27:35.20
    2) Now I re-created the table with partition(range yearly - below) and the same insert took 59 minuts.
    Is there anyway i can achive the better performance during insert on this partitioned table?
    [ similerly, I have another table with 50 Million records and the insert took 10 hrs without partition.
    with partitioning the table, it took 18 hours... ]
    SQL> select * from table(dbms_xplan.display);
    PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
    Plan hash value: 4195045590
    | Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes |TempSpc| Cost (%CPU)| Time |
    | 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 643K| 34M| | 12917 (3)| 00:02:36 |
    |* 1 | HASH JOIN | | 643K| 34M| 2112K| 12917 (3)| 00:02:36 |
    | 2 | VIEW | index$_join$_001 | 69534 | 1290K| | 529 (3)| 00:00:07 |
    |* 3 | HASH JOIN | | | | | | |
    | 4 | INDEX FAST FULL SCAN| PK_ACCOUNT_MASTER_BASE | 69534 | 1290K| | 181 (3)| 00:00
    | 5 | INDEX FAST FULL SCAN| ACCOUNT_MASTER_BASE_IDX2 | 69534 | 1290K| | 474 (2)| 00:00
    PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
    | 6 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | TB_SISADMIN_BALANCE | 2424K| 87M| | 6413 (4)| 00:01:17 |
    Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
    1 - access("A"."VENDOR_ACCT_NBR"=SUBSTR("B"."ACCOUNT_NO",1,8) AND
    "A"."VENDOR_CD"="B"."COMPANY_NO")
    3 - access(ROWID=ROWID)
    Open C1;
    Loop
    Fetch C1 Bulk Collect Into C_Rectype Limit 10000;
    Forall I In 1..C_Rectype.Count
    Insert test
         col1,col2,col3)
    Values
         val1, val2,val3);
    V_Rec := V_Rec + Nvl(C_Rectype.Count,0);
    Commit;
    Exit When C_Rectype.Count = 0;
    C_Rectype.delete;
    End Loop;
    End;
    Total Rec Inserted :- 2424233
    PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
    Elapsed: 00:51:01.22
    Edited by: user520824 on Jul 16, 2010 9:16 AM

    I'm concerned about the view in step 2 and the index join in step 3. A composite index with both columns might eliminate the index join and result in fewer read operations.
    If you know which partition the data is going into beforehand you can save a little bit of processing by specifying the partition (which may not be a scalable long-term solution) in the insert - I'm not 100% sure you can do this on inserts but I know you can on selects.
    The APPEND hint won't help the way you are using it - the VALUES clause in an insert makes it be ignored. Where it is effective and should help you is if you can do the insert in one query - insert into/select from. If you are using the loop to avoid filling up undo/rollback you can use a bulk collect to batch the selects and commit accordingly - but don't commit more often than you have to because more frequent commits slow transactions down.
    I don't think there is a nologging hint :)
    So, try something like
    insert /*+ hints */ into ...
    Select
         A.Ing_Acct_Nbr, currency_Symbol,
         Balance_Date,     Company_No,
         Substr(Account_No,1,8) Account_No,
         Substr(Account_No,9,1) Typ_Cd ,
         Substr(Account_No,10,1) Chk_Cd,
         Td_Balance,     Sd_Balance,
         Sysdate,     'Sisadmin'
    From Ideaal_Cons.Tb_Account_Master_Base A,
         Ideaal_Staging.Tb_Sisadmin_Balance B
    Where A.Vendor_Acct_Nbr = Substr(B.Account_No,1,8)
       And A.Vendor_Cd = b.company_no
          ;Edited by: riedelme on Jul 16, 2010 7:42 AM

  • Problems with partition tables

    Hi all,
    I've got some problems with partition tables. The script at the bottom run but when I wanna insert some values it returns me an error
    (ORA-06550: line 1, column 30: PL/SQL: ORA-06552: PL/SQL: Compilation unit analysis terminated
    ORA-06553: PLS-320: the declaration of the type of this expression is incomplete or malformed
    ORA-06550: line 1, column 7: PL/SQL: SQL Statement ignored)
    and I can't understand why!
    There's something incorrect in the script or not?
    Please help me
    Thanks in advance
    Steve
    CREATE TABLE TW_E_CUSTOMER_UNIFIED
    ID_CUSTOMER_UNIFIED VARCHAR2 (27) NOT NULL ,
    START_VALIDITY_DATE DATE NOT NULL ,
    END_VALIDITY_DATE DATE ,
    CUSTOMER_STATUS VARCHAR2 (255)
    PARTITION BY RANGE (START_VALIDITY_DATE)
    SUBPARTITION BY LIST (END_VALIDITY_DATE)
    PARTITION M200909 VALUES LESS THAN (TO_DATE('20091001','YYYYMMDD'))
    (SUBPARTITION M200909_N VALUES (NULL), SUBPARTITION M200909_NN VALUES (DEFAULT)),
    PARTITION M200910 VALUES LESS THAN (TO_DATE('20091101','YYYYMMDD'))
    (SUBPARTITION M200910_N VALUES (NULL), SUBPARTITION M200910_NN VALUES (DEFAULT)),
    PARTITION M200911 VALUES LESS THAN (TO_DATE('20091201','YYYYMMDD'))
    (SUBPARTITION M200911_N VALUES (NULL), SUBPARTITION M200911_NN VALUES (DEFAULT)),
    PARTITION M200912 VALUES LESS THAN (TO_DATE('20100101','YYYYMMDD'))
    (SUBPARTITION M200912_N VALUES (NULL), SUBPARTITION M200912_NN VALUES (DEFAULT)),
    PARTITION M201001 VALUES LESS THAN (TO_DATE('20100201','YYYYMMDD'))
    (SUBPARTITION M201001_N VALUES (NULL), SUBPARTITION M201001_NN VALUES (DEFAULT)),
    PARTITION M201002 VALUES LESS THAN (TO_DATE('20100301','YYYYMMDD'))
    (SUBPARTITION M201002_N VALUES (NULL), SUBPARTITION M201002_NN VALUES (DEFAULT)),
    PARTITION M210001 VALUES LESS THAN (MAXVALUE))
    (SUBPARTITION M210001_N VALUES (NULL), SUBPARTITION M210001_NN VALUES (DEFAULT))
    ;

    Hi Hoek,
    the DB version is 10.2 (italian version, then SET is correct).
    ...there's something strange: now I can INSERT rows but I can't update them!
    I'm using this command string:
    UPDATE TW_E_CUSTOMER_UNIFIED SET END_VALIDITY_DATE = TO_DATE('09-SET-09', 'DD-MON-RR') WHERE
    id_customer_unified = '123' and start_validity_date = TO_DATE('09-SET-09', 'DD-MON-RR');
    And this is the error:
    Error SQL: ORA-14402: updating partition key column would cause a partition change
    14402. 00000 - "updating partition key column would cause a partition change"
    *Cause:    An UPDATE statement attempted to change the value of a partition
    key column causing migration of the row to another partition
    *Action:   Do not attempt to update a partition key column or make sure that
    the new partition key is within the range containing the old
    partition key.
    I think that is impossible to use a PARTITION/SUBPARTITION like that: in fact the update of "END_VALIDITY_DATE" cause a partition change.
    Do u agree or it's possible an update on a field that implies a partition change?
    Regards Steve

  • Problems Faced with Partitions in Oracle 9i.

    I have a doubt regarding the partitions in Oracle 9i can you please help me regarding this?
    Create table t1
    ( x number,
    y number,
    z number);
    insert into t1 values (1,1,1);
    insert into t1 values (2,2,2);
    insert into t1 values (3,3,3);
    Create table t2
    x number,
    y number,
    z number
    partition by range(x)
    partition p1 values less than(2),
    partition p2 values less than(3),
    partition p3 values less than(4),
    partition p4 values less than(maxvalue)
    alter table t2 exchange partition p1 with table t1;
    SQL> alter table t2 exchange partition p1 with table t1;
    alter table t2 exchange partition p1 with table t1
    ERROR at line 1:
    ORA-14099: all rows in table do not qualify for specified partition
    WHAT DOES THIS ERROR MESSAGE MEAN? I AM NOT ABLE TO UNDERSTAND THIS? WHAT NEED's TO BE DONE TO RESOLVE THIS?
    alter table t2 exchange partition p1 with table t1 WITHOUT VALIDATION;
    SQL> SELECT * FROM T2;
    X Y Z
    1 1 1
    2 2 2
    3 3 3
    SQL> SELECT * FROM T2 PARTITION(P1);
    X Y Z
    1 1 1
    2 2 2
    3 3 3
    SQL> SELECT * FROM T2 PARTITION(P2);
    no rows selected
    SQL> SELECT * FROM T2 PARTITION(P3);
    no rows selected
    (i) Why i am facing this error ORA-14099: while partitioning? Can you please brief me about this ?
    (ii) why there is not data's in the PARTITIONS p2 &p3 after the partitions is exchanged WITHOUT VALIDATION options?
    what is going with this method?
    (iii) Also can you please explain me with an example how to partitions a table having milliion of records with EXCHANGE PARTITION Options with MULITPLE partition segment's (say partition based on status id column with 6 differnt values i am thinking to use list partitions using status_id as partition key) ?
    Also i have tried the below approch is this a right approch? please correct me if i am wrong.
    Create table t1
    ( x number,
    y number,
    z number);
    insert into t1 values (1,1,1);
    insert into t1 values (2,2,2);
    insert into t1 values (3,3,3);
    commit;
    Create table t2
    x number,
    y number,
    z number
    partition by range(x)
    partition p1 values less than(2),
    partition p2 values less than(3),
    partition p3 values less than(4),
    partition p4 values less than(maxvalue)
    SQL> insert into t2 select * from t1;
    3 rows created.
    SQL> commit;
    Commit complete.
    SQL> SELECT * FROM T2 PARTITION(P1);
    X Y Z
    1 1 1
    SQL> SELECT * FROM T2 PARTITION(P2);
    X Y Z
    2 2 2
    SQL> SELECT * FROM T2 PARTITION(P3);
    X Y Z
    3 3 3
    SQL> SELECT * FROM T2 PARTITION(P4);
    no rows selected
    EXPLAIN PLAN
    FOR SELECT * FROM T2 WHERE X = 1
    | Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost | Pstart| Pstop |
    | 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 1 | 9 | 2 | | |
    | 1 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | T2 | 1 | 9 | 2 | 1 | 1 |
    Now my question is what is problem instead of using EXCHANGE PARTITION why caun't we follow this above approch?
    to partition a non-partitioned table?
    Thanks,
    Rajesh.

    The value of 3 should obviously should go into the partition P3.Then why are you putting it into p1?
    Your command,
    <tt>    alter table t2 exchange partition <b>p1</b> with table t1;</tt>
    will swap partition p1 with the contents of table t1, leaving you with partition p1 containing the three values that were in t1. At first it told you there were rows in t1 that did not belong in that partition, but you used FORCE so it put them in anyway.
    btw there are notes in the FAQ about how to use ** tags to format your posts.
    ~Edited by: William Robertson on Oct 15, 2008 6:49 AM~                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           

  • OBIEE  SSO  with authorization

    Hi Gurus,
    1)I have instance configured the SSO with windows Active Directory and OBIEE.
    2)I also have another instance ( without SSO configured) with external table authentication( user name and password verification) and authorization( groups , which populate the session variables for data filtering) .
    Now my question is , i want a combination of Scenario 1 and Scenario 2. I want to have OBIEE SSO with Active directory
    and external table groups.
    The reason being , my groups are custom groups in external table, i do not want to maintain users in repository.
    can you please give me pointers if the scenario is possible . Thanks in Advance
    Thanks and Regards
    Satya

    Now my question is , i want a combination of Scenario 1 and Scenario 2. I want to have OBIEE SSO with Active directory and external table groups.I don't what your issue is? Just do SSO with AD and then load the groups in the GROUP init block via SQL. What is your actual issue?
    In order to filter the data in reports you need to have the same group structure in Web Cat i guess ( correct me if i am wrong).Yes, although you don't need to use the same group names. Inm fact I prefer to have completely separate groups names, some for RPD security some for Web Catalog security. As long as the the groups exist in the proper location (RPD or Web Catalog) and they get assigned in the GROUP init block then OBIEE will be happy, they don't need to exist in both places.
    2) Will not SSO populate the Remote_User variable rather than the USER variable by default.No, you have to tell OBIEE where to put the REMOTE_USER value. You can simply do SELECT ':USER' FROM DUAL or if you have your users defined in a table you can also authenticate that the user exists in this table SELECT ':USER' FROM USER_TABLE WHERE USER_ID = ':USER' which adds another layer of authentication to your SSO solution.

  • Is it possible to create table with partition in compress mode

    Hi All,
    I want to create a table in compress option, with partitions. When i create with partitions the compression isnt enabled, but with noramal table creation the compression option is enables.
    My question is:
    cant we create a table with partition/subpartition in compress mode..? Please help.
    Below is the code that i have used for table creation.
    CREATE TABLE temp
      TRADE_ID                    NUMBER,
      SRC_SYSTEM_ID               VARCHAR2(60 BYTE),
      SRC_TRADE_ID                VARCHAR2(60 BYTE),
      SRC_TRADE_VERSION           VARCHAR2(60 BYTE),
      ORIG_SRC_SYSTEM_ID          VARCHAR2(30 BYTE),
      TRADE_STATUS                VARCHAR2(60 BYTE),
      TRADE_TYPE                  VARCHAR2(60 BYTE),
      SECURITY_TYPE               VARCHAR2(60 BYTE),
      VOLUME                      NUMBER,
      ENTRY_DATE                  DATE,
        REASON                      VARCHAR2(255 BYTE),
    TABLESPACE data
    PCTUSED    0
    PCTFREE    10
    INITRANS   1
    MAXTRANS   255
    NOLOGGING
    COMPRESS
    NOCACHE
    PARALLEL (DEGREE 6 INSTANCES 1)
    MONITORING
    PARTITION BY RANGE (TRADE_DATE)
    SUBPARTITION BY LIST (SRC_SYSTEM_ID)
    SUBPARTITION TEMPLATE
      (SUBPARTITION SALES VALUES ('sales'),
       SUBPARTITION MAG VALUES ('MAG'),
       SUBPARTITION SPI VALUES ('SPI', 'SPIM', 'SPIIA'),
       SUBPARTITION FIS VALUES ('FIS'),
       SUBPARTITION GD VALUES ('GS'),
       SUBPARTITION ST VALUES ('ST'),
       SUBPARTITION KOR VALUES ('KOR'),
       SUBPARTITION BLR VALUES ('BLR'),
       SUBPARTITION SUT VALUES ('SUT'),
       SUBPARTITION RM VALUES ('RM'),
       SUBPARTITION DEFAULT VALUES (default)
    PARTITION RMS_TRADE_DLY_MAX VALUES LESS THAN (MAXVALUE)    
        LOGGING
            TABLESPACE data
         ( SUBPARTITION TS_MAX_SALES VALUES ('SALES')      TABLESPACE data,
        SUBPARTITION TS_MAX_MAG VALUES ('MAG')      TABLESPACE data,
        SUBPARTITION TS_MAX_SPI VALUES ('SPI', 'SPIM', 'SPIIA')      TABLESPACE data,
        SUBPARTITION TS_MAX_FIS VALUES ('FIS')      TABLESPACE data,
        SUBPARTITION TS_MAX_GS VALUES ('GS')      TABLESPACE data,
        SUBPARTITION TS_MAX_ST VALUES ('ST')      TABLESPACE data,
        SUBPARTITION TS_MAX_KOR VALUES ('KOR')      TABLESPACE data,
        SUBPARTITION TS_MAX_BLR VALUES ('BLR')      TABLESPACE data,
        SUBPARTITION TS_MAX_SUT VALUES ('SUT')      TABLESPACE data,
        SUBPARTITION TS_MAX_RM VALUES ('RM')      TABLESPACE data,
        SUBPARTITION TS_MAX_DEFAULT VALUES (default)      TABLESPACE data)); Edited by: user11942774 on 8 Dec, 2011 5:17 AM

    user11942774 wrote:
    I want to create a table in compress option, with partitions. When i create with partitions the compression isnt enabled, but with noramal table creation the compression option is enables. First of all your CREATE TABLE statement is full of syntax errors. Next time test it before posting - we don't want to spend time on fixing things not related to your question.
    Now, I bet you check COMPRESSION value of partitioned table same way you do it for a non-partitioned table - in USER_TABLES - and therefore get wrong results. Since compreesion can be enabled on individual partition level you need to check COMPRESSION in USER_TAB_PARTITIONS:
    SQL> CREATE TABLE temp
      2  (
      3    TRADE_ID                    NUMBER,
      4    SRC_SYSTEM_ID               VARCHAR2(60 BYTE),
      5    SRC_TRADE_ID                VARCHAR2(60 BYTE),
      6    SRC_TRADE_VERSION           VARCHAR2(60 BYTE),
      7    ORIG_SRC_SYSTEM_ID          VARCHAR2(30 BYTE),
      8    TRADE_STATUS                VARCHAR2(60 BYTE),
      9    TRADE_TYPE                  VARCHAR2(60 BYTE),
    10    SECURITY_TYPE               VARCHAR2(60 BYTE),
    11    VOLUME                      NUMBER,
    12    ENTRY_DATE                  DATE,
    13      REASON                      VARCHAR2(255 BYTE),
    14    TRADE_DATE                  DATE
    15  )
    16  TABLESPACE users
    17  PCTUSED    0
    18  PCTFREE    10
    19  INITRANS   1
    20  MAXTRANS   255
    21  NOLOGGING
    22  COMPRESS
    23  NOCACHE
    24  PARALLEL (DEGREE 6 INSTANCES 1)
    25  MONITORING
    26  PARTITION BY RANGE (TRADE_DATE)
    27  SUBPARTITION BY LIST (SRC_SYSTEM_ID)
    28  SUBPARTITION TEMPLATE
    29    (SUBPARTITION SALES VALUES ('sales'),
    30     SUBPARTITION MAG VALUES ('MAG'),
    31     SUBPARTITION SPI VALUES ('SPI', 'SPIM', 'SPIIA'),
    32     SUBPARTITION FIS VALUES ('FIS'),
    33     SUBPARTITION GD VALUES ('GS'),
    34     SUBPARTITION ST VALUES ('ST'),
    35     SUBPARTITION KOR VALUES ('KOR'),
    36     SUBPARTITION BLR VALUES ('BLR'),
    37     SUBPARTITION SUT VALUES ('SUT'),
    38     SUBPARTITION RM VALUES ('RM'),
    39     SUBPARTITION DEFAULT_SUB VALUES (default)
    40    )  
    41  (  
    42   PARTITION RMS_TRADE_DLY_MAX VALUES LESS THAN (MAXVALUE)    
    43      LOGGING
    44          TABLESPACE users
    45       ( SUBPARTITION TS_MAX_SALES VALUES ('SALES')      TABLESPACE users,
    46      SUBPARTITION TS_MAX_MAG VALUES ('MAG')      TABLESPACE users,
    47      SUBPARTITION TS_MAX_SPI VALUES ('SPI', 'SPIM', 'SPIIA')      TABLESPACE users,
    48      SUBPARTITION TS_MAX_FIS VALUES ('FIS')      TABLESPACE users,
    49      SUBPARTITION TS_MAX_GS VALUES ('GS')      TABLESPACE users,
    50      SUBPARTITION TS_MAX_ST VALUES ('ST')      TABLESPACE users,
    51      SUBPARTITION TS_MAX_KOR VALUES ('KOR')      TABLESPACE users,
    52      SUBPARTITION TS_MAX_BLR VALUES ('BLR')      TABLESPACE users,
    53      SUBPARTITION TS_MAX_SUT VALUES ('SUT')      TABLESPACE users,
    54      SUBPARTITION TS_MAX_RM VALUES ('RM')      TABLESPACE users,
    55      SUBPARTITION TS_MAX_DEFAULT VALUES (default)      TABLESPACE users));
    Table created.
    SQL>
    SQL>
    SQL> SELECT  PARTITION_NAME,
      2          COMPRESSION
      3    FROM USER_TAB_PARTITIONS
      4    WHERE TABLE_NAME = 'TEMP'
      5  /
    PARTITION_NAME                 COMPRESS
    RMS_TRADE_DLY_MAX              ENABLED
    SQL> SELECT  COMPRESSION
      2    FROM USER_TABLES
      3    WHERE TABLE_NAME = 'TEMP'
      4  /
    COMPRESS
    SQL> SY.

Maybe you are looking for

  • Using Touch ID for App store when you have seperate Apple IDs for iCloud and iTunes

    My wife and I each have a new iPhone 5S.  We share the same Apple ID for iTunes and the App Store. In addition, we each have our own unique Apple IDs for iCloud.  This enables us to use iMessage to text to each other. Can the iPhone 5S be setup to us

  • During costing batch price is not picking

    Hi, Thanks  in advance, We activated  batch valuation type with FIFO activation for materials procured externally , while running costing system  not picking batch price, it is picking moving  average price , Thanks and Regards, prema.d

  • How to made plugin using flex3 application

    Hi   All, I am working on transitiom plug-in for  premiere pro cs3 ,using  premiere pro cs3 SDK. now i am developing plugins by using adobe flex3 ,application name is transition viewer in which when click on thumbnail play the transition on  the text

  • JSF Output Encoding

    Hi JSF community, I'm quiet new to JSF and have two questions regardings JSF's output encoding. Does JSF provide a built-in method for replacing special characters with their corresponding HTML entities, and if this is the case, since when does it su

  • Itunes in the cloud - item no longer available

    Hi I am trying to download my previously bought music from itunes, but both my iphone (ios 7) and my work computer (windows, itunes 11) is reporting "the item you tried to buy is no longer available" on all my 861 songs! How may i fix this? I have tr