Object Number (OBJNR) in BW Data Model

Hi Gurus,
We are currently facing a hard to answer question. Here is the context:
- We use PS module in ECC6
- Somtimes WBS elements are renamed, ie the input mask is changed whereas costs were already allocated to that WBS
- The standard extractor for cost extract the WBS with its input mask
- Thus when a WBS element changes of input mask the cost might be on 2 different WBS in the BW datawarehouse. The attributes might change and thus the cost might be wrongly split on different objects...
Some other effects are for example that the User and systems statuses are not updated on the new WBS element.
The only we found to mitigate that issue, is to use the Object Number as the key reference. Thus, today, we think of using the OBJNR for each object category (Project, WBS, etc), and use it as the new key for these objects. We would transfer the attributes from 0WBS_ELEMT for example to ZOBNJRWB.
Has anyone experienced taht approach ? What would you see as benefits and disadvantages for that way of modelling the data ?
Thanks for your help
PY

Hi
thanks for the reply
Actually, the key is also changed when we extract transactional data.
For example, there is a cost of 10$ for WBS1, which has the OBJNR1, for period January
In february, there is a new cost of 20$, but between the two operations, WBS1 was fully renamed (the mask fully renames everything) to WBS2. The OBJNR did not change at all.
So if I look at the oveall cost per WBS or any attributes that was not updated correctly against the new WBS, I am screwed.because I am missing some data. But If I look at the data by OBJNR I am OK.
So I was wondering if someone decided to use that approach for BW.
Anyway, the conversion aspect is something very important that I haven't seen yet!
Thanks
PY

Similar Messages

  • Same icons for objects in SQL Developer as Data Modeler

    Hello,
    would it be possible to display the same icons for objects in SQL Developer as Data Modeler?
    For example:
    - in SQLD a session temporary table has the icon of a table with an X symbol, in Data Modeler it is just a table icon.
    - in SQLD a materialized view has the icon of a table with 2 arrows, in data Modeler it is just a table icon.
    Joop

    Hi Joop,
    I think you will find that in Data Modeler's Physical Model tree the same icons are used for temporary Tables and Materialized Views as in SQL Developer.
    David

  • How do you create a sequence number in SQL Developer Data Modeler?

    I am new to Data Modeler and am looking to create a sequence number but do not know how to do the same using the Data Modeler. Can someone guide me? Thanks.
    Edited by: user6710206 on Jun 9, 2010 7:32 AM

    I have had found that the following works sometimes when coming immediately after the create or replace package body in a script (although it isn't doing anything for me on invalid package bodies at the moment):
    show errors package body <package name>
    Because it is inconsistent, you cannot really trust it, which gets you back to Jim's options (open in editor or compile from connection tree) or the old long hand of
    select * from user_errors where type = 'PACKAGE BODY' and name = '<package name>'

  • Increased Object Type support within Data Modeler

    Hi,
    This is a question mainly for the Data Modeler Development Team as well as the Tools group. First of all, the production version of Data Modeler 3.0 is very nice and the improvements in the DataTypes area over what was in EA1 are great. Thanks for adding the Domain support to the definition of Attributes and Parameters for Methods, that makes life much simpler and opens the door for a much wider range of object type modeling and ease of implementations since consistency can now be maintained much easier via Domains. Also the support for straightening of lines is awesome. This is the best implementation I have seen, even better that what we had in the Design Editor in Oracle Designer, kudos again to the team that built the diagrammer interfaces.
    My question is, Going forward will Data Modeler continued to be enhanced to finally fully support Oracle Objects and the object relational (OR) model? I ask this because as users of Oracle's RDBMS, we do not have a tool that allows us to fully model and implement the features provided by the Server Group in the area of Object-Relational features and functionality. Oracle Designer had some OR modeling capability, but the end of life on product stopped all further development. One of the common excuses is there is no market demand for object - relational modeling. I would argue, that the lack of market demand for object - relational applications is because we have never have had a tool that fully supports Oracle's object - relational model. Nor do have we had a development tool that allows us to implement a fully developed Oracle Object - Relational model. The tools group stopped the development of Oracle Forms support for nested objects and collections. The LOV functionality for REF columns is pretty awesome, but we can't get to nested collections much less a nested collection of REFs.
    So as a member of the end user community, we are stuck in this Catch 22. The Server Group continues to support and enhance the Object - Relational model, but the Tools and Modeling Groups haven't kept up with the tools to model or implement the functionality and features supported by the database. As a result we have a partially built set of tools that allows us to scratch the surface of the Object - Relational model but are not able to take full advantage of the powerful features of inheritance, inherited and extended collections, the ability to inherit and then extend methods, etc...
    The Object - Relational model was introduced with Oracle8, 10g solved the type evolution problem which made production implementation of object types realistic. My question is; Is Data Modeler finally going to fully support Oracle's object - relational model? If we as the end user community finally get a tool that does fully support the OR model, we'll finally be able to model, build and deploy applications that will in turn create that market demand which is lacking for the object relational model.
    Thanks in advance,
    ScottK

    Phil,
    Yes, having the ability to include an attribute from an data type as part of the PK, UK and or index will be very, very nice. Doing that opens a number of doors on the design, modeling and implementation sides. It would allow us to model and then create a data type which has all the common attributes for housekeeping information within each entity -> table. This is something we tried to do with Designer but was pretty involved script wise. By being able to create specialized housekeeping datatypes and then using the 'add attribute' with the scripts provided with DM 3.0, it simplifies the model after the fact. Think about it, we'll be able to have a datatype with all the attributes for created on/by and modified on/by along will all the methods to populate those attributes (formerly columns), then we can include that datatype into the entity as an attribute called say, 'row_audit' with the datatype of 'common_'. Now in one pass we have the place to hold the information of who created and modified the row as well as the date and time along with all the code required to populate and maintain that information. Everything modeled, defined and written in one place. No more have to include or write the pl/sql across several different modules, rather the calls to the method, a constructor, are within the insert or update statements for that table. If we take that train of thought and extend it to include the housekeeping functions for relational primary keys, then we can create one datatype with the attribute and methods to create a single column primary key. Once that is pulled into an entity, defined as the part of the unique identifier and then pushed down as a primary key and resulting foreign keys. We have all the code to enforce and populate primary and foreign keys wrapped up in one datatype with its supporting method as a constructor. Think of the other possibilities that would be available once we can include nested attributes w/i keys and indexes. It makes some models and designs much simpler, more maintainable, more scalable (less code to execute), etc...
    I have been thinking about this. I see ya'll have provided the options for IN, OUT, IN/OUT, COPY and NOCOPY as modifiers for the parameters on methods. We also have the option for COPY / NOCOPY in the constructor method for type. Will that be included?
    Lastly, since the Server Group solved the type evolution problem, that coupled with the ability to include a datatype as a definition for column really opens the design doors. For example, by using a datatype of 'common_', as mentioned above, if the system requirement appears after the system is built for a the name of the source system to be included with the 'row_audit' information, we can modify the datatype 'common_' to include these new attributes and methods and then the ALTER TYPE syntax provided by the Server and Language groups to effectively extend all the tables to include this new system requirement. Till the Server group solved the type evolution problem, this wasn't possible and we had to write several 'alter table add column' scripts. This is all replaced with the ALTER TYPE... cascade data command now. Once DM 3.0 includes the ability to reference embedded attributes, design and modeling life will be great.
    Thanks in advance,
    ScottK

  • OBIEE Best Practice Data Model/Repository Design for Objectives/Targets

    Hello World!
    We are faced with a design question that has become somewhat difficult and we need some help. We want to be able to compare side-by-side actual measures with their corresponding objectives/targets. Sounds simple. But, our objectives are static (not able to be aggregated) with multi-dimensionality and multi-levels. We need some best practice tips on how to design our data model and repository properly so that we can see the objective/target for a measure regardless of the dimensions that are used in the criteria and regardless of the level.
    Here is some more details:
    Example of existing objective table.
    Dimension1
    Dimension2
    Dimension3
    Obj1
    Obj2
    Quarter
    NULL
    NULL
    NULL
    .99
    1.8
    1Q13
    DIM1VAL1
    NULL
    NULL
    .99
    2.4
    1Q13
    DIM1VAL1
    DIM2VAL1
    NULL
    .98
    2.41
    1Q13
    DIM1VAL1
    DIM2VAL1
    DIM3VAL1
    .97
    2.3
    1Q13
    DIM1VAL1
    NULL
    DIM3VAL1
    .96
    1.9
    1Q13
    NULL
    DIM2VAL1
    NULL
    .97
    2.2
    1Q13
    NULL
    DIM2VAL1
    DIM3VAL1
    .95
    2.0
    1Q13
    NULL
    NULL
    DIM3VAL1
    .94
    3.1
    1Q13
    - Right now we have quarterly objectives set using 3 different dimensions. So, if an author were to add one or more (or zero) dimensions to their criteria for a given measure they could get back a different objective. They could add Dimension1 and get 99%. They could add Dimension1 and Dimension2 and get 98%. They could add all three dimensions and get 97%. They could add zero dimensions (highest grain) and get 99%. Using our existing structure if we were to add a new dimension to the mix the possible combinations would grow dramatically. (Not flexible)
    - We would like our final solution to be flexible enough so that we could view objectives with altogether different dimensions and possibly get different objectives.
    - We currently have 3 fact tables with 3+ conformed dimension tables and a few unique dimension tables.
    Could anyone share a similar situation where you have implemented a data model structure with the proper repository joins to handle showing side-by-side objectives/targets where the objectives were static and could be displayed at differing levels with flexible dimensions as described?
    Any help would be greatly appreciated.

    hi..yes this suggestion is nice...first configure the sensors(activity or variable) ..then configure the sensor action as a JMS Topic which will in turn insert the data into a DB..Or when u configure the sensor action as a DB..then the data goes to Oracle Reports schema..if there is any chance of altering the DB..i mean if there is any chance by changing config files so that the data doesnt go to that Reports schema and goes to a custom schema created by any User....i dont know if it can b done...my problem is wen i m configuring the jms Topic for sensor actions..i see blank data coming..for sm reason or the other the data is not getting posted ...i have used a esb ..a routing service based on the schema which i am monitoring...can any1 help?

  • Object Types Attributes (Data Modeler 3.0 EA1.)

    Hi,
    Will the attribute object type support in data modeler be upgraded to the same functionality as column relational table support in 3.0? For relational columns I can attach a domain to a column, I can't attach a domain to an attribute in an object type. Also for a column I can define a 'Units', that is VARCHAR2 (30 BYTE) orVARCHAR2 (30 CHAR). If can't do this with the (Data Modeler 3.0 EA1.) for an object type's attribute. Will this be included?
    Thanks,
    Scott

    Sue,
    Thanks to you and your team for extending this to the object type (structured type) portion of SDDM 3.3 EA1 and 3.3 EA2. The object type portion of SDDM is pretty robust now for modeling and actually generating useable structures in the database (Oracle) now. With 3.3 EA2 at this point it will be much easier to take advantage of the object type features in the database and our applications. I have been waiting since Oracle version 8 for the tools team to provide a modeling tool that mirrors the functionality the server team has provided when it comes object types.
    Thanks for this in SDDM 3.3 EA1 and SDDM 3.3 EA2!
    ScottK

  • Needed SAP CRM Data model with Object, Entity and Attribute level details

    Hello all,
                 We are working on a huge IS-U / CRM implementation and we are still in the data gathering phase. The client has a whole load of legacy systems that will be replaced with IS-U and CRM. Right now we are in the process of developing data models using Excel first and then presenting them to the client to go forward from there. For this we need to have all the business objects, entities and their attributes.
    I know about the SD11 transaction, but we don't have a CRM system yet. My colleagues have access to a German ERP system and they were able to get models for HR, FI and Asset management. I tried for the Business partner / customer in there, but the models were not proper.
    So, once again, I need the specific data models out of SD 11 for  CRM business partner. If anybody has the information, please do pass it on to me as I need them urgently. It would be a great help if somebody can do so.
    Regards
    Rajesh

    I suggest the following:
    Please, check whether the system works if you activate the implementation BUPA_F4_AUGRP.
    In addition check the notes 559662, 674869 and 782927. Maybe the notes are already implemented but you can try then the implementation of the BADI (SE19). It should resolve your issue.
    I have implemented this Badi solution before, and after activation; the search help ; nor search result list did NOT show any Business partners anymore that had an authorization group I was not allowed to see.
    kind regards
    Davy Pelssers
    SAP CRM/Security consultant

  • Role of text & hirarhies of info object property in cube data model & Bex

    Hi,
    Info object have properties : first > attribute can be either display or navigational which are as charatristics(dimension's) display property and as in navigational folder res. in cube > display data model, in display attribute can we see same as like data modle while navigational attribute will serve as charateristics of res dimension. ( in BI 7.0 )
    where is the text and hirirchey property of info object in cube data model and bex analyzer?
    Best regards,
    Dushaynt.

    hi,
    follow this link. it will help.
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_bw33/helpdata/en/ad/6b023b6069d22ee10000000a11402f/frameset.htm

  • Why you put object in data model

    Hi All
    I did my interview and interviewer asked me the following question.
    Question Why you put object in data model?
    Appreciate your answer. Thanks
    Regards
    Shu

    <BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by xuechen:
    Hi, I am facing to choose an DBMS product for a big project. Does 8i support an object-oriented or object-relational data model?
    Thank you!<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
    Hi, Oracle8 and Oracle8i will provide you object relational model. It is not pure object-oriented solution. In the field of databases it is difficult to impliment pure object-oriented solution now a days. But it is easy to understand and design an object-relational design and implimentation. In Oracle8 there are some very useful facilities for such a design like the concept of nested tables. I had a project of defence nature and design in object-relational technique and find much easy and understandable then pure relational approach. If it is possible for you then please be contect with me on mail and send me a little information about your work and experience.
    Regards,
    Awais
    null

  • Business object architecture data model

    HI All,
    Can anyone give the architectural data model for business object ?
    i got few but my data base is sap BI and i need to design a document to show the data model
    so anybody having such document or any link for that so please share.
    thanks in advance.
    regards,
    DJ.

    Hi DJ,
    Best Practice says that if you have SAP BI in Back end and SAP BOBJ on front End then follow below mentioned path.
    Create your SAP Query on the top of your InfoCube or ODS etc
    Use calculated Key Figures and Restricted Key Figures in your Query.
    Use most of the objects under Free Characteristics area for better performance and results
    Create your Universe on the top of SAP Query. (we can create universe on the top of Cube and ODS but then we cannot use variable and performance also gets hit)
    You can also create further variable / Filters at Universe level instead of WebI to improve performance
    Create WebI report or Crystal Report etc (You can also create variables / Filters here).
    Page 38 of following link gives a diagram for better understanding.
    [http://help.sap.com/businessobject/product_guides/boexir31/en/xi3-1_bip_admin_en.pdf]
    Bashir Awan

  • Data Modeler - Default object's schema

    Hi All!
    I’m starter in Data Modeler.
    I can’t find a simple option - default object’s owner or default schema.
    In Data Modeler, I already have tables and other objects. So, when I generate DDL SQL
    I’m getting:
    CREATE TABLE <table name>
    How can I get:
    CREATE TABLE <schema>.<table name>
    Thanks!

    Thank you, Philip, for your answer!
    Actually, I did it.
    I opened physical model, added user and changed user for table.
    So, it’s ok, however, I not found where is changing owner for indexes.
    Because, I got like this:
    CREATE TABLE <schema>.<table name> --- it’s ok
    CREATE INDEX <index name> --- it’s wrong there is no owner
    How can I change indexes owner?
    And, indeed, it’s not suitable to change owner for each object. Is there an opportunity to change owners for all objects synchronously?

  • Object-relational data model

    Hi, I am facing to choose an DBMS product for a big project. Does 8i support an object-oriented or object-relational data model?
    Thank you!

    <BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by xuechen:
    Hi, I am facing to choose an DBMS product for a big project. Does 8i support an object-oriented or object-relational data model?
    Thank you!<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
    Hi, Oracle8 and Oracle8i will provide you object relational model. It is not pure object-oriented solution. In the field of databases it is difficult to impliment pure object-oriented solution now a days. But it is easy to understand and design an object-relational design and implimentation. In Oracle8 there are some very useful facilities for such a design like the concept of nested tables. I had a project of defence nature and design in object-relational technique and find much easy and understandable then pure relational approach. If it is possible for you then please be contect with me on mail and send me a little information about your work and experience.
    Regards,
    Awais
    null

  • Data modeling dilemma for EAV oriented problems in Data Modeler

    Hello,
    Dealing with EAV( entity attribute value model ) oriented structure of data.
    So this look like this:
    Entity( Entity_Id number , Entity_Name varchar2, Entity_Desc varchar2 )
    Entity that list attributes and some meta data on characteristics of attributes:
    Type_Of_Attribute( Attr_Id varchar2, Type_Of_Value TOV_Domain, Unit_Of_Value varchar2 , Min_Value variant_type , Max_Value variant_Type )
    Then we have actual data. Entity is described with set of attributes and their values. So aditionally to attributes on row form in Entity there are aditional attrbutes in columnar form.
    Because of sparsity...
    However there in columnar form the challenge or issue is type of values so domains of attributes.
    For example:
    weight_of_ person is number between min_number and max_number.
    But another parameter for example mood_of_person is string from the domain which consists of set of strings/descpriptions.
    Another possibility could be reference to some table of values ( key value ) that could be modelled as one:many relationship if put in entity Entity on row form of attributes.
    But since this is attribute relate only to few intances or it is very dispersed....and for preserving table form..it was put in columnar form ..
    Attribute_Of_Entity( Entity_Id, Attr_Id, value,
                                     -- when not normalized, could be add also unit like kg or lbs or inch or piece ).
    My question is on good/succesfull practice of modelling for VALUE in attribute_of_entity?
    Somewhere read that some databases have feature of so-called variant type.
    Guess the objective is to modell in such a way that implementation of this model is as easy as possbile in
    issues like:
    a) validating column oriented form during entering or updating values
    b) consolidating queries when reporting
    c) agregating data when grouping when grouping data and preventing non-comparable data.
    So to implement value as structure/complex_type with methods or there is any other feature supporting variabilty of the data along same column in the table. So logical design that would not cause too much complexity in the relational design and table implementation and procedures are handled as much as possible on the database level?
    Thank you in advance for  comments, experiences, suggestions,

    Hello,
    EAV is rarely a good solution. Tell us about your business problem and we might be able to show you solutions that are performant/easier to maintain/...
    https://www.simple-talk.com/opinion/opinion-pieces/bad-carma/
    Regards
    Marcus
    BTW: this question should not be asked in the forum space for the tool SQL Data Modeler. Instead ask in SQL and PL/SQL or General Database Discussions

  • Problems with printing from SQL Developer Data Modeler 2.0

    Hi,
    I am not able to print my Relational Model (SubView) from Data Modeler 2.0 Build 584. Only an empty page comes out. If I don't reduce the Print Scale (usually to 10-30%) I get something but then it is lots of pages. I have tried A4 and A3 format. Printing to JPEG or PDF seems to be ok.
    I have relational data model with 25 tables in my SubView.
    Is there any restriction on Print Scale or number of objects in the diagram?
    Do I have to install SQL Developer as well? I have just Data Modeler insalled.
    Regards,
    Alex

    Hi Alex,
    There is newer version of Data Modeler (3.0 EA2) and it is free
    You can download it from here
    http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/developer-tools/datamodeler/ea2-downloads-185792.html
    Regards
    Edited by: Dimitar Slavov on Dec 9, 2010 2:15 AM

  • SQL Developer Data Modeler suggestions

    Not sure where to post this (unable to connect to the blog from work due to network restrictions), hope this is the correct forum.
    I am testing out the Data Modeler product. I've got a large database that I want to reverse engineer, then work with the resulting model. I used the import feature which successfully imported all 1849 tables from my schema. However, this created a diagram which wasn't really useful. A couple of things I believe would be useful.
    1. Add better connectivity between the browser that shows the table listing and the diagram. When I click on a table, I'd like the corresponding element in the diagram to be highlighted (and vice-versa). Also, an option to have the diagram show that table would be useful (maybe a ctrl-click or shift-click).
    2. Subviews - I don't see an easy way to add to a subview once it is created. So, add an option to the browser and diagram right-click menu to "Add to SubDiagram". Currently the diagram allows you to create a subdiagram, I didn't see an add option.
    3. More keyboard shortcuts. Specifically, CTRL-Z to undo, CTRL-Y to repeat.
    4. Defined column types. You've got naming rules, but I'd like to be able to define columns as a predefined type, like "Dollar Amount", which would make my column become a number(9.2) or something like that.
    That's it for now - may be more to come.
    Don

    Hi,
    Thanks for the feedback. Most of these are in the product:
    +1. Add better connectivity between the browser that shows the table listing and the diagram. When I click on a table, I'd like the corresponding element in the diagram to be highlighted (and vice-versa). Also, an option to have the diagram show that table would be useful (maybe a ctrl-click or shift-click).+
    Go to Tools > General Options: Select Diagram and check the synchronize with tree option.
    +2. Subviews - I don't see an easy way to add to a subview once it is created. So, add an option to the browser and diagram right-click menu to "Add to SubDiagram". Currently the diagram allows you to create a subdiagram, I didn't see an add option.+
    There are threads in the forum about subviews and you can look at the demos available online on the [Data Modeler|http://www.oracle.com/technology/products/database/datamodeler/index.html] page - we'll be adding more, but the import from Data Dictionary demo talks about subviews.
    In short, select a few objects, right-click and create subview from selected, or right-click on the subview node in the browser and select new subview, and then drag the tables you want onto the new diagram.
    +3. More keyboard shortcuts. Specifically, CTRL-Z to undo, CTRL-Y to repeat.+
    We will be adding more shortcut keys.
    +4. Defined column types. You've got naming rules, but I'd like to be able to define columns as a predefined type, like "Dollar Amount", which would make my column become a number(9.2) or something like that.+
    These are Domains. Select Tools > Domains Administration, and add your domains.
    I'm working on adding short demos for all these features and we'll build these up over time.
    Sue

Maybe you are looking for

  • How do I eliminate the columns in the header?

    I don't want 3 columns in my header. I want 1 column. How do I do that? This should be a no-brainer, but apparently not.

  • MacBook slow startsup and goes black in Standbymode

    My MacBook behaves strange. After pressing the power button it shows the grey apple screen, which is normal. When the 'windmill symbol dissappears the screen goes to the typical blue screen. So far so good but it won't  load snowleapard. The screen s

  • Adobe air admin rights installation error

    so i just bought town of salem on steam, and i need adobe air to run it.. but i cant seem to install cause it needs admin rights and i contacted windows to verify that i do have all the rights. any ideas/tips?

  • Which accounts Hit for movement types

    Dear gurus, pleas help to find out which account get hit  with movement types. thanking you in advance regards, raghu

  • Skype installed as external drive rather than application?

    I realise that this is most likely something very basic but it remains beyond my abilities as someone not yet familiar with Macs. My wife installed Skype on our MacBook but it has appeared as an external drive - every time we turn the mac on Skype la