[OIM 9.1.0.2] Attestation Process scheduled is not automatically running

Hi Gurus,
IHAC that noticed that some attestation processes have not been triggered in the specified scheduled time, . So the Attestation tasks are not displayed into specified Reviewer's inbox (To-Do List).
There is a group responsible for creating the attestation processes and they have created a lot of processes. It seems that for some reason the attestation scheduled task is not automatically running for some cases.
For the attestation processes that were stopped, it is needed to run manually the scheduled task. With this action the attestation task flow runs.
Any tip on what could I check?
Thanks.

Hi,
I checked the Schedule task 'Initiate Attestation Processes'. It is Enabled, with frequency 30 min. Actual status: Inactive.
I got the follow error on the logs:
Something related to Memory.
I am investigating why when I use 'Run Now' option the attestation process work. Any tip?
<28/11/2012 03h32min51s BRST> <Info> <EJB> <BEA-010227> <EJB Exception occurred during invocation from home or business: [email protected]340a3f3 threw exception: java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: Java heap space>
<28/11/2012 03h32min51s BRST> <Notice> <Stdout> <BEA-000000> <ERROR,28 Nov 2012 03:32:51,518,[XELLERATE.SCHEDULER.TASK],Error while resubmitting the attestation process for delegation
Thor.API.Exceptions.tcAPIException: EJB Exception: ; nested exception is:
java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: Java heap space
at Thor.API.Operations.AttestationOperationsClient.updateResponses(Unknown Source)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39)
at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:597)
at Thor.API.Base.SecurityInvocationHandler$1.run(Unknown Source)
<28/11/2012 03h34min57s BRST> <Notice> <Stdout> <BEA-000000> <ERROR,28 Nov 2012 03:34:57,977,[XELLERATE.SCHEDULER.TASK],Error: Thor.API.Exceptions.AttestationProcessNotFoundException
Thor.API.Exceptions.AttestationProcessNotFoundException
at com.thortech.xl.ejb.beansimpl.AttestationOperationsBean.initiateAttestationProcess(Unknown Source)
at com.thortech.xl.ejb.beans.AttestationOperationsSession.initiateAttestationProcess(Unknown Source)
at com.thortech.xl.ejb.beans.AttestationOperations_yqqnsm_EOImpl.initiateAttestationProcess(AttestationOperations_yqqnsm_EOImpl.java:1033)
at Thor.API.Operations.AttestationOperationsClient.initiateAttestationProcess(Unknown Source)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)

Similar Messages

  • How attestation process scheduler runs?

    When i create an attestation process with following details
    starting date:10 August 2010
    schedule: run every one days
    Please tell me how many times in a day will this process run?
    When I tried to create attestation with above details,execution history showed that the process got executed multiple times in a day.

    It might be not what you had in mind but this might be a solution:
    mount a partition of your networked drive on: /var/log
    then all your logs will be on the NFS drive without editting a boatload of configs.
    You know that it is, of course, close to impossible to catch log-entries that happen before your NFS-mount,
    so you might want to consider something like this when mounting:
    kill -SIGSTOP <all logger-pids>
    cp -a /var/log /dev/shm/logtmp
    mount NFS-volume on /var/log
    cp -a /dev/shm/logtmp /var/log
    kill -SIGCONT <all logger-pids>
    this is it..more or less, far from complete ofcourse but you get the idea of what it is supposed to do.
    remember that you can't have, ever, any bootlog directly written to NFS during boot because during boot time your NFS is not mounted yet
    good luck !
    TSK
    Edited by: 833060 on 1-feb-2011 13:31
    by the way, Nicolas has a good point...is it worth the extra networktraffic and slowdown ?

  • 3rd Party Consignment Process - Schedule Line Not Confirmed

    Below is the process that is being followed in the system:
    1) Consignment Fill Up is created with materials having Item Category as "Consignment 3rd Party ".
    2) A Purchase Requisition is automatically created as soon as the Order is saved.
    3) A Batch Job runs periodically that removes the check "X" in the field "Account Assignment Category " from the Purchase Requisition.
    4) After the X is removed from PR, another Batch Job runs that creates the Purchase Order from Purchase Requisition.
    5) After PO creation, Delivery is created from Consignment Fill Up Sales Order. (Vendor directly delivers the material to Customer and the PGI of    delivery moves the Stock into Consignee's account)
    Issue that happened in the System:
    1) A Consignment Fill Up was created with 2 materials having item category as "Consignment 3rd Party "
    2) A Purchase Requisition was automatically created.
    3) "X" was removed from "Account assignment category" field in PR by the Batch Job. Removal of this "X" breaks the link between the Fill Up Order and Purchase Requisition.
    4) After this, Purchase Orders were created for both the materials.
    5) Now, in the Consignment Fill Up, Sales Unit was changed from KG to LB for line item 10. This caused the Schedule Line for line item 10 to change its status from "Confirmed" to "Not Confirmed" and Confirmed Quantity = 0.
    6) Now, when the delivery was created for the Fill Up Order, only Line Item 20 was delivered.
    7) The main issue here is - How to create the Delivery for line item 10 from Fill Up OR How to confirm the Schedule Line for line item 10 ??
    Is there any way out by which the line Item 10 can be seen in VL10H or VL01N ?
    Note: We cannot change any configuration as we only have display access for the configuration.
    One solution could be - To reject the Line Item 10 in the Fill Up Order and then creating a fresh Fill Up Order for the same material and same quantity and then, deliver it. This would also move the Material Stock into Consignee's Account.
    But, if there is any workaround available by which we can deliver the Line item 10 without rejecting it, please let me know.
    Thanks n advance for your suggestions.

    Hello,
    the proposed solution seems correct to me: check if when creating the new item, you have the option to choose an alternative item category not creating a Purchase request but getting material from available stock.
    If you simply create a new item, its account assignment category will expect to get the material to be delivered from special stock E assigned to that item.
    Anyway if this doesn't work you don't have many alternatives: why don't you ask to the SAP support team or to the IT to solve this issue?
    Best regards,
    Andrea

  • DBMS_SCHEDULER.RUN_JOB causes scheduled job not to run again

    Environment: 10.2.0.2 Linux 64-bit
    Hi,
    I have some DBMS_SCHEDULER chain jobs scheduled to run every hour which has been running fine with no issues for a while now.
    I needed to run a couple of jobs manually in-between scheduled times so I ran the job using DBMS_SCHEDULER.RUN_JOB, and that worked as expected as it has done in the past.
    This issue is that the jobs I ran manually haven't run at their scheduled time since I did that. The only way around it was to recreate the job completely.
    Any idea if this is normal functionality, or should I be raising this as a possible issue through Oracle Metalink?
    Any help or ideas would be much appreciated.
    Thanks
    Tim

    Hi Tim,
    This is a known bug which is tracked internally by bug #5705385. It will be fixed in the next patchsets for 10.2 and 11.1 (i.e. 10.2.0.5 and 11.1.0.7) . If you urgently need a fix, an official patch seems to be available for 10.2.0.3 .
    There does seem to be a workaround - using run_job again after the first run_job has completed will not do anything but the chain job should again run on schedule.
    Hope this helps,
    Ravi.

  • App Server and Process Scheduler stuck while booting

    Hi All,
    We are facing a big issue in our production instance.The application server showed down while accessing the PIA.When we tried to reboot the same it didnt start and was getting stuck after some steps..few snipets are below after the last PSSRENSRV process does not proceed further.
    exec PSSAMSRV  --A  --  -C  psappsrv.cfg  -D FNPROD  -S PSSAMSRV:
            CMDTUX_CAT:819: INFO:Process id=5584 Assume started <pipe>.
    exec PSSAMSRV  --A  --  -C  psappsrv.cfg  -D FNPROD  -S PSSAMSRV:
            CMDTUX_CAT:819: INFO:Process id=5600 Assume started <pipe>.
    exec PSSAMSRV  --A  --  -C  psappsrv.cfg  -D FNPROD  -S PSSAMSRV:
            CMDTUX_CAT:819: INFO:Process id=5616 Assume started <pipe>.
    exec PSSAMSRV  --A  --  -C  psappsrv.cfg  -D FNPROD  -S PSSAMSRV:
            CMDTUX_CAT:819: INFO:Process id=5632 Assume started <pipe>.
    exec PSSAMSRV  --A  --  -C  psappsrv.cfg  -D FNPROD  -S PSSAMSRV:
            CMDTUX_CAT:819: INFO:Process id=5648 Assume started <pipe>.
    exec PSSAMSRV  --A  --  -C  psappsrv.cfg  -D FNPROD  -S PSSAMSRV:
            CMDTUX_CAT:819: INFO:Process id=5664 Assume started <pipe>.
    exec PSRENSRV  --A  --   -C  psappsrv.cfg  -D FNPROD  -S PSRENSRV:The tuxedo,appserv and renserv logs shows,
    renserv log
    ----- Begin booting PSRENSRV -------------------------
    0.5608 [14/Jul/2011 07:51:54](ERROR) CRenTuxSvcMgr::ReqBootParameters - Tux service call failed.
    ----- Begin booting PSRENSRV -------------------------
    0.5056 [14/Jul/2011 07:58:47](ERROR) CRenTuxSvcMgr::ReqBootParameters - Tux service call failed.
    ----- Begin booting PSRENSRV -------------------------
    0.780 [14/Jul/2011 08:21:04](ERROR) CRenTuxSvcMgr::ReqBootParameters - Tux service call failed.------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    tuxedo log
    receiving messages, tperrno = TPEOS, Uunixerr = UMSGRCV
    082104.UKLO2K3S55!JSH.5060.5084.-2: JOLT_CAT:1107: "ERROR: Error receiving messages, tperrno = TPEOS, Uunixerr = UMSGRCV"
    082104.UKLO2K3S55!WSH.4364.1752.0: WSNAT_CAT:1107: ERROR: Error receiving messages, tperrno = TPEOS, Uunixerr = UMSGRCV
    082104.UKLO2K3S55!WSH.4472.4416.0: WSNAT_CAT:1107: ERROR: Error receiving messages, tperrno = TPEOS, Uunixerr = UMSGRCV
    082104.UKLO2K3S55!WSH.1684.4128.0: WSNAT_CAT:1107: ERROR: Error receiving messages, tperrno = TPEOS, Uunixerr = UMSGRCV
    082104.UKLO2K3S55!WSH.4256.4172.0: WSNAT_CAT:1107: ERROR: Error receiving messages, tperrno = TPEOS, Uunixerr = UMSGRCV
    082104.UKLO2K3S55!JSH.4876.496.-2: JOLT_CAT:1107: "ERROR: Error receiving messages, tperrno = TPEOS, Uunixerr = UMSGRCV"
    082104.UKLO2K3S55!WSH.4896.4284.0: WSNAT_CAT:1107: ERROR: Error receiving messages, tperrno = TPEOS, Uunixerr = UMSGRCV
    082104.UKLO2K3S55!JSH.4800.1036.-2: JOLT_CAT:1107: "ERROR: Error receiving messages, tperrno = TPEOS, Uunixerr = UMSGRCV"
    082104.UKLO2K3S55!WSL.3904.4032.0: LIBTUX_CAT:703: ERROR: Cannot get statistics on message queue 43
    082104.UKLO2K3S55!JSL.4316.4024.0: JOLT_CAT:1196: "INFO: Terminating handlers in preparation for shutdown"
    082104.UKLO2K3S55!WSL.3904.4032.0: WSNAT_CAT:1197: INFO: Exiting system
    082104.UKLO2K3S55!JREPSVR.5768.5800.0: LIBTUX_CAT:271: ERROR: System lock semop failure, key = 61480 (errno = 22)
    082104.UKLO2K3S55!WSL.3904.4032.0: LIBTUX_CAT:268: ERROR: Failed to stop serving
    082104.UKLO2K3S55!JSL.4316.4024.0: JOLT_CAT:1197: "INFO: Exiting system"
    082104.UKLO2K3S55!JREPSVR.5768.5800.0: LIBTUX_CAT:268: ERROR: Failed to stop serving
    082104.UKLO2K3S55!JSL.4316.4024.0: LIBTUX_CAT:268: ERROR: Failed to stop serving
    082105.UKLO2K3S55!PSWATCHSRV.6124.568.-2: ERROR: msgrcv err(LIBTUX_CAT:669: ERROR: Message operation failed because of the invalid message queue identifier): errno=22,qid=2,buf=9580216,bytes=4572,type=-1073741824,flag=2048
    082105.UKLO2K3S55!PSWATCHSRV.6124.568.-2: LIBTUX_CAT:268: ERROR: Failed to stop serving------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    app serv log
    PSADMIN.4944 (0) [07/14/11 07:48:28](0) Begin boot attempt on domain FNPROD
    PSWATCHSRV.4720 (0) [07/14/11 07:48:33] Starting
    PSADMIN.4944 (0) [07/14/11 07:52:29](0) End boot attempt on domain FNPROD
    PSADMIN.4944 (0) [07/14/11 07:55:46](0) Begin boot attempt on domain FNPROD
    PSWATCHSRV.1412 (0) [07/14/11 07:55:50] Starting
    PSADMIN.4892 (0) [07/14/11 08:08:07](0) Begin boot attempt on domain FNPROD
    PSWATCHSRV.5032 (0) [07/14/11 08:08:13] Starting
    PSADMIN.4892 (0) [07/14/11 08:08:27](0) End boot attempt on domain FNPROD
    PSADMIN.6104 (0) [07/14/11 08:20:28](0) Begin boot attempt on domain FNPROD
    PSWATCHSRV.6124 (0) [07/14/11 08:20:32] Starting-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    tuxedo log
    213815.UKLO2K3S55!PSSAMSRV.6072.6040.0: LIBTUX_CAT:262: INFO: Standard main starting
    213815.UKLO2K3S55!PSRENSRV.2440.2444.-2: 07-13-2011: Tuxedo Version 8.1 32-bit Windows.
    213815.UKLO2K3S55!PSRENSRV.2440.2444.-2: LIBTUX_CAT:262: INFO: Standard main starting
    214434.UKLO2K3S55!BBL.5964.4464.0: ERROR: msgrcv err(LIBTUX_CAT:666: ERROR: Message operation failed because the queue was removed): errno=100,qid=257,buf=10285048,bytes=4572,type=-1073741824,flag=0
    214434.UKLO2K3S55!PSRENSRV.2440.2444.-2: ERROR: msgrcv err(LIBTUX_CAT:666: ERROR: Message operation failed because the queue was removed): errno=100,qid=277,buf=11551960,bytes=8668,type=805306369,flag=0
    214434.UKLO2K3S55!BBL.5964.4464.0: ERROR: msgrcv err(LIBTUX_CAT:669: ERROR: Message operation failed because of the invalid message queue identifier): errno=22,qid=257,buf=10285048,bytes=4572,type=0,flag=0
    214434.UKLO2K3S55!BBL.5964.4464.0: LIBTUX_CAT:271: ERROR: System lock semop failure, key = 33242 (errno = 22)
    214434.UKLO2K3S55!BBL.5964.4464.0: LIBTUX_CAT:268: ERROR: Failed to stop serving
    214434.UKLO2K3S55!BBL.5964.4464.0: CMDTUX_CAT:26: INFO: The BBL is exiting system
    214434.UKLO2K3S55!PSWATCHSRV.5208.4528.-2: ERROR: msgrcv err(LIBTUX_CAT:669: ERROR: Message operation failed because of the invalid message queue identifier): errno=22,qid=258,buf=9654368,bytes=27996,type=-1073741824,flag=2048
    214434.UKLO2K3S55!PSWATCHSRV.5208.4528.-2: LIBTUX_CAT:268: ERROR: Failed to stop serving
    214507.UKLO2K3S55!tmboot.4616.5152.-2: 07-13-2011: Tuxedo Version 8.1 32-bit Windows.
    214507.UKLO2K3S55!tmboot.4616.5152.-2: TUXNT_CAT:4: ERROR: Cannot access ipc server (The system cannot find the file specified.
    214507.UKLO2K3S55!tmboot.4616.5152.-2: tmboot: CMDTUX_CAT:827: ERROR: Fatal error encountered; initiating user error handler
    214508.UKLO2K3S55!PSADMIN.868: End boot attempt on domain FNPRODAlso the process scheduler was not getting booted the logs are shown below,
    scheduler log
    085646.UKLO2K3S55!restartsrv.2484.4116.-2: server BASE/101: CMDTUX_CAT:587: INFO: Cannot restart server, scheduling for cleanup
    085653.UKLO2K3S55!BBL.4044.5996.0: LIBTUX_CAT:550: WARN: Cleaning up restartable server BASE/101
    085653.UKLO2K3S55!BBL.4044.5996.0: LIBTUX_CAT:216: WARN: Process 4300 died; removing from BB
    085653.UKLO2K3S55!BBL.4044.5996.0: LIBTUX_CAT:216: WARN: Process 5372 died; removing from BB
    085653.UKLO2K3S55!BBL.4044.5996.0: LIBTUX_CAT:216: WARN: Process 5640 died; removing from BB
    085653.UKLO2K3S55!BBL.4044.5996.0: LIBTUX_CAT:216: WARN: Process 5768 died; removing from BB
    085653.UKLO2K3S55!cleanupsrv.4148.4364.-2: 07-14-2011: Tuxedo Version 8.1 32-bit Windows.
    085653.UKLO2K3S55!cleanupsrv.4148.4364.-2: GP_CAT:1077: ERROR: Unable to open environment file E:\Psoft\PRDAPP\appserv\prcs\FNPROD\psprcsrv.env for reading
    085653.UKLO2K3S55!cleanupsrv.4148.4364.-2: LIBTUX_CAT:353: ERROR: Error putting ENVFILE E:\Psoft\PRDAPP\appserv\prcs\FNPROD\psprcsrv.env into environment
    085653.UKLO2K3S55!cleanupsrv.4148.4364.-2: server BASE/101: CMDTUX_CAT:551: INFO: server removed
    085743.UKLO2K3S55!BBL.4044.5996.0: ERROR: msgrcv err(LIBTUX_CAT:666: ERROR: Message operation failed because the queue was removed): errno=100,qid=80,buf=10304328,bytes=4572,type=-1073741824,flag=0
    085743.UKLO2K3S55!BBL.4044.5996.0: ERROR: msgrcv err(LIBTUX_CAT:669: ERROR: Message operation failed because of the invalid message queue identifier): errno=22,qid=80,buf=10304328,bytes=4572,type=-1073741824,flag=0
    085743.UKLO2K3S55!BBL.4044.5996.0: LIBTUX_CAT:271: ERROR: System lock semop failure, key = 64479 (errno = 22)
    085743.UKLO2K3S55!BBL.4044.5996.0: LIBTUX_CAT:268: ERROR: Failed to stop serving
    085743.UKLO2K3S55!BBL.4044.5996.0: CMDTUX_CAT:26: INFO: The BBL is exiting systemIs this a problem with Tuxedo if so what has to be done...Pls help its a bit urgent...
    Thanks in advance...

    First of all; if a problem is urgent then you should always contact Oracle support instead.
    It looks like the domain is corrupt within Tuxedo. You could try to reconfigure the domain so that it will get recreated in Tuxedo. Make sure you have a backup before you do this. To reconfigure the domain simply open a CMD box and type the following command (from the appserver directory):
    psadmin -c configure -d "DOMAIN_NAME"
    You can only use this command for the application server.

  • OIM Attestation Process Default Administrative Groups

    It seems that, by default, when a user creates an attestation process that it inherits all the groups that the user is a member of as members of the Administrative Groups for that process. Furthermore, these groups have write and delete privileges.
    This is troublesome to me. Every OIM user is a member of the Employees group, therefore every attestation task could be deleted, modified, run, etc, by any user on the system. Surely this is not the intended behavior.
    It would make sense if the Process owner group were added to the Administrative Groups, but not every single group that they are a member of!
    Does anyone have an idea on how to correct this?

    Martin, Thank you for the reply. The OIM product docs have content indicating that OIM supports attestation at entitlement level. So was wondering if there is any straightforward way to achieve and I was missing something. I guess there will be a lot of overhead in maintaining the AD Groups as resource objects in OIM. In certain cases there will be thousands of AD Groups. If you know could you please advise on the impact / care to be taken with this approach.
    Thank you.

  • OIM- Attestation Process

    Hello,
    Within OIM, is there a way to define attestation process that filters at the IT Resource level?

    Thank you.

  • OIM Attestation Process Stuck in 'Pending' State

    I have created an User Entitlement Attestation process that resulted in zero total records. I think that this was because I did not have any resources marked as 'financially significant'. Nevertheless, it seems that the process should have auto completed since there were no records found, but instead it is stuck in 'pending' with no tasks for anyone to perform.
    Anyone know what I should do to get the process to complete?

    Hi
    I also facing the same issues as you, User Entitlement Attestation process don't work.
    Did you able to fix it now ?
    Thanks in advanced
    Thanks
    John

  • Issue with Bulk Load Post Process Scheduled Task

    Hello,
    I successfully loaded users in OIM using the bulk load utility.  I also have LDAP sync ON.  The documentation says to run the Bulk Load Post Process scheduled task to push the loaded users in OIM into LDAP.
    This works if we run the Bulk Load Post Process Scheduled Task right away after the run the bulk load.
    If some time had passed and we go back to run the Bulk Load Post Process Scheduled Task, some of the users loaded through the bulk load utility are not created in our LDAP system.  This created an off-sync situation between OIM and our LDAP.
    I tried to use the usr_key as a parameter to the Bulk Load Post Process Scheduled Task without success.
    Is there a way to force the re-evaluation of these users so they would get created in LDAP?
    Thanks
    Khanh

    The scheduled task carries out post-processing activities on the users imported through the bulk load utility.

  • Error in attestation process

    Hi,
    I have created an attestation process and ran the same. The task for the review got generated for the same and I can see the tasks in the reviews queue.
    Now when I try to perform any action on these task after login to OIM as reviewer I am not able to save action. I am getting following error when I click on Save Action button :
    <Nov 15, 2012 3:56:11 PM IST> <Error> <XELLERATE.ATTESTATION> <BEA-000000> <Class/Method: ManageAttestationTaskAction/saveAttestationRequestActions encounter some problems: {1} Thor.API.Exceptions.tcInvalidPermissionsException
    Thor.API.Exceptions.tcInvalidPermissionsException
    at com.thortech.xl.ejb.beansimpl.AttestationOperationsBean.submitReponses(AttestationOperationsBean.java:399)
    at Thor.API.Operations.AttestationOperationsIntfEJB.submitReponsesx(Unknown Source)
    at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
    at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39)
    at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
    at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:597)
    at com.bea.core.repackaged.springframework.aop.support.AopUtils.invokeJoinpointUsingReflection(AopUtils.java:310)
    at com.bea.core.repackaged.springframework.aop.framework.ReflectiveMethodInvocation.invokeJoinpoint(ReflectiveMethodInvocation.java:182)
    at com.bea.core.repackaged.springframework.aop.framework.ReflectiveMethodInvocation.proceed(ReflectiveMethodInvocation.java:149)
    at com.bea.core.repackaged.springframework.aop.support.DelegatingIntroductionInterceptor.doProceed(DelegatingIntroductionInterceptor.java:131)
    at com.bea.core.repackaged.springframework.aop.support.DelegatingIntroductionInterceptor.invoke(DelegatingIntroductionInterceptor.java:119)
    at com.bea.core.repackaged.springframework.aop.framework.ReflectiveMethodInvocation.proceed(ReflectiveMethodInvocation.java:171)
    at com.bea.core.repackaged.springframework.jee.spi.MethodInvocationVisitorImpl.visit(MethodInvocationVisitorImpl.java:37)
    at weblogic.ejb.container.injection.EnvironmentInterceptorCallbackImpl.callback(EnvironmentInterceptorCallbackImpl.java:54)
    at com.bea.core.repackaged.springframework.jee.spi.EnvironmentInterceptor.invoke(EnvironmentInterceptor.java:50)
    at com.bea.core.repackaged.springframework.aop.framework.ReflectiveMethodInvocation.proceed(ReflectiveMethodInvocation.java:171)
    at com.bea.core.repackaged.springframework.aop.interceptor.ExposeInvocationInterceptor.invoke(ExposeInvocationInterceptor.java:89)
    at com.bea.core.repackaged.springframework.aop.framework.ReflectiveMethodInvocation.proceed(ReflectiveMethodInvocation.java:171)
    at com.bea.core.repackaged.springframework.aop.support.DelegatingIntroductionInterceptor.doProceed(DelegatingIntroductionInterceptor.java:131)
    at com.bea.core.repackaged.springframework.aop.support.DelegatingIntroductionInterceptor.invoke(DelegatingIntroductionInterceptor.java:119)
    at com.bea.core.repackaged.springframework.aop.framework.ReflectiveMethodInvocation.proceed(ReflectiveMethodInvocation.java:171)
    at com.bea.core.repackaged.springframework.aop.framework.JdkDynamicAopProxy.invoke(JdkDynamicAopProxy.java:204)
    at $Proxy363.submitReponsesx(Unknown Source)
    at Thor.API.Operations.AttestationOperationsIntf_r58oir_AttestationOperationsIntfRemoteImpl.__WL_invoke(Unknown Source)
    at weblogic.ejb.container.internal.SessionRemoteMethodInvoker.invoke(SessionRemoteMethodInvoker.java:40)
    at Thor.API.Operations.AttestationOperationsIntf_r58oir_AttestationOperationsIntfRemoteImpl.submitReponsesx(Unknown Source)
    at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
    at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39)
    at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
    at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:597)
    at weblogic.ejb.container.internal.RemoteBusinessIntfProxy.invoke(RemoteBusinessIntfProxy.java:85)
    at $Proxy177.submitReponsesx(Unknown Source)
    at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
    at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39)
    at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
    at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:597)
    at org.springframework.aop.support.AopUtils.invokeJoinpointUsingReflection(AopUtils.java:307)
    at org.springframework.aop.framework.JdkDynamicAopProxy.invoke(JdkDynamicAopProxy.java:198)
    at $Proxy316.submitReponsesx(Unknown Source)
    at Thor.API.Operations.AttestationOperationsIntfDelegate.submitReponses(Unknown Source)
    at com.thortech.xl.webclient.actions.ManageAttestationTaskAction.saveAttestationRequestActions(ManageAttestationTaskAction.java:623)
    at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
    at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39)
    at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
    at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:597)
    at org.apache.struts.actions.DispatchAction.dispatchMethod(DispatchAction.java:269)
    at com.thortech.xl.webclient.actions.tcLookupDispatchAction.execute(tcLookupDispatchAction.java:133)
    at com.thortech.xl.webclient.actions.tcActionBase.execute(tcActionBase.java:894)
    at com.thortech.xl.webclient.actions.tcAction.execute(tcAction.java:213)
    at org.apache.struts.chain.commands.servlet.ExecuteAction.execute(ExecuteAction.java:58)
    at org.apache.struts.chain.commands.AbstractExecuteAction.execute(AbstractExecuteAction.java:67)
    at org.apache.struts.chain.commands.ActionCommandBase.execute(ActionCommandBase.java:51)
    at org.apache.commons.chain.impl.ChainBase.execute(ChainBase.java:191)
    at org.apache.commons.chain.generic.LookupCommand.execute(LookupCommand.java:305)
    at org.apache.commons.chain.impl.ChainBase.execute(ChainBase.java:191)
    at org.apache.struts.chain.ComposableRequestProcessor.process(ComposableRequestProcessor.java:283)
    at org.apache.struts.action.ActionServlet.process(ActionServlet.java:1913)
    at org.apache.struts.action.ActionServlet.doPost(ActionServlet.java:462)
    at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:727)
    at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:820)
    at weblogic.servlet.internal.StubSecurityHelper$ServletServiceAction.run(StubSecurityHelper.java:227)
    at weblogic.servlet.internal.StubSecurityHelper.invokeServlet(StubSecurityHelper.java:125)
    at weblogic.servlet.internal.ServletStubImpl.execute(ServletStubImpl.java:300)
    at weblogic.servlet.internal.TailFilter.doFilter(TailFilter.java:26)
    at weblogic.servlet.internal.FilterChainImpl.doFilter(FilterChainImpl.java:56)
    at com.thortech.xl.webclient.security.CSRFFilter.doFilter(CSRFFilter.java:76)
    at weblogic.servlet.internal.FilterChainImpl.doFilter(FilterChainImpl.java:56)
    at oracle.iam.platform.auth.web.PwdMgmtNavigationFilter.doFilter(PwdMgmtNavigationFilter.java:121)
    at weblogic.servlet.internal.FilterChainImpl.doFilter(FilterChainImpl.java:56)
    at oracle.iam.platform.auth.web.OIMAuthContextFilter.doFilter(OIMAuthContextFilter.java:107)
    at weblogic.servlet.internal.FilterChainImpl.doFilter(FilterChainImpl.java:56)
    at oracle.security.jps.ee.http.JpsAbsFilter$1.run(JpsAbsFilter.java:111)
    at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method)
    at oracle.security.jps.util.JpsSubject.doAsPrivileged(JpsSubject.java:31
    3)
    at oracle.security.jps.ee.util.JpsPlatformUtil.runJaasMode(JpsPlatformUtil.java:413)
    at oracle.security.jps.ee.http.JpsAbsFilter.runJaasMode(JpsAbsFilter.java:94)
    at oracle.security.jps.ee.http.JpsAbsFilter.doFilter(JpsAbsFilter.java:161)
    at oracle.security.jps.ee.http.JpsFilter.doFilter(JpsFilter.java:71)
    at weblogic.servlet.internal.FilterChainImpl.doFilter(FilterChainImpl.java:56)
    at oracle.dms.servlet.DMSServletFilter.doFilter(DMSServletFilter.java:13
    6)
    at weblogic.servlet.internal.FilterChainImpl.doFilter(FilterChainImpl.java:56)
    at weblogic.servlet.internal.RequestEventsFilter.doFilter(RequestEventsFilter.java:27)
    at weblogic.servlet.internal.FilterChainImpl.doFilter(FilterChainImpl.java:56)
    at weblogic.servlet.internal.WebAppServletContext$ServletInvocationAction.wrapRun(WebAppServletContext.java:3715)
    at weblogic.servlet.internal.WebAppServletContext$ServletInvocationAction.run(WebAppServletContext.java:3681)
    at weblogic.security.acl.internal.AuthenticatedSubject.doAs(AuthenticatedSubject.java:321)
    at weblogic.security.service.SecurityManager.runAs(SecurityManager.java:120)
    at weblogic.servlet.internal.WebAppServletContext.securedExecute(WebAppServletContext.java:2277)
    at weblogic.servlet.internal.WebAppServletContext.execute(WebAppServletContext.java:2183)
    at weblogic.servlet.internal.ServletRequestImpl.run(ServletRequestImpl.java:1454)
    at weblogic.work.ExecuteThread.execute(ExecuteThread.java:209)
    at weblogic.work.ExecuteThread.run(ExecuteThread.java:178)
    >
    Please let me know what could be the reason for the same.
    Thanks.

    *<Nov 15, 2012 3:56:11 PM IST> <Error> <XELLERATE.ATTESTATION> <BEA-000000> <Class/Method: ManageAttestationTaskAction/saveAttestationRequestActions encounter some problems: {1} Thor.API.Exceptions.tcInvalidPermissionsException*
    Are you using XELSYSADM?
    One approach can be to give ALL USERS all the permissions temporarily to figure out which Permission is missing and where...
    You can assign permission via ALL USERS group profile --> Drop Down --> Permissions --> Assign..
    Note down the current permissions so that after you fixed issue, you can restore the current permissions

  • Attestation Process - futher action

    Hi All
    I had create a attestation process, invite reviewer to review the resources.
    let say, the reviewer had certify the resource and submit.
    Once the reviewer submit the resource and i need to do further action such as send an email to administrator but how should to create this task to send an email ?
    Thanks in advance

    Hi,
    1.You need to modify out of box attestation schedule task to achieve.Just check the schedule task and its code.You can modify it easly.
    2.This is available out of box.In every resource provisioning process you will find attestation related task.I don't remember the task name.Go to that task and in the response tab you will find certify and reject response.You can your de provisoned task on the reject status.
    3.This will be tough to do it not sure if possible.Check the out of box API.
    Regards
    Nitesh

  • Attestation process-query

    my requirement is during the Attestation process the 1st reviewer will delegate the some of user resources to 2nd reviewer e.t.c. when the 1st reviewer deleagates to the 2nd reviewer should mention the start date and end date.
    can the above requirement come under OIM OOB functionality or do we need to go for customization?
    if so please tell the steps fr customization

    Have you looked at using the APIs?
    http://otndnld.oracle.co.jp/document/products/id_mgmt/idm_904/doc_cd/javadocs/operations/Thor/API/Operations/AttestationOperationsIntf.html
    I took a quick look and nothing looks very promising but it may be me being blind so it could be worth a second look.
    Best regards
    /Martin

  • Attestation Process - 90_dml_insert_attestation_mil_sch.sql

    hello, now i stuck on Attestation process. Please help.
    I'm new to OIM and using version 9.0.3.1.
    Now i'm doing the lab exercise for Attestation Process(howevr this lab exercise is apply to version 9.0.3.1), in 1 of the steps its instructed me to execute the 90_dml_insert_attestation_mil_sch.sql but i can't find in the folder that it specify.
    However i managed find the similar files name as Oracle_Create_Attestation.sql, so i wonder is Oracle_Create_Attestation.sql is equally as 90_dml_insert_attestation_mil_sch.sql ??
    Thanks a million
    John

    Rajiv ,
    BY changing the process owner group to what you suggested it worked , the attestation process is created but for some fields it showing junk values .
    Hw can i attach a snapshot here ?? I wud like to show you the snapshot of the attestation process which is created .
    Thanks
    Suren

  • Component is not getting displayed in process scheduler menu

    Hi All,
    I have created a project and created/registered a component in that project. I have also added a page which is having a record definition with a record named L_RUNCNTL having two search fields, to this component and configured L_RUNCNTL as search record for this component.
    I have registered this component with below details:
    Menu Name : PROCESS_SCHEDULER
    Bar Name : PROCESS
    Folder Name as PT_PROCESS_SCHEDULER
    Select “Always Use default local node?” Check box
    Permission List : PTPT1000
    But after registration, when I open process scheduler menu I dont see this component listed. However, previously I created a component in this project and registered it with same details given above and I could see it in process scheduler menu.
    I am surprised why another component registered with same details is not getting displayed in process scheduler menu.

    Thanks Michel,
    I got this problem resolved. Here is what I did:
    Ran portal security sync at the navigation PeopleTools > Portal > Portal Security Sync.
    Cleared browser cache, accessed the page again and saw the link was available.

  • How to print of a crystal output on paper through process Scheduler in PeopleSoft.

    Post Author: rajaumareddy
    CA Forum: Charts and Graphs
    while printing crystal through process scheduler in PeopleSoft it giving Error as Runstatus. and i given in Printer destination.
    Could u help me to find solution.
    1. what are process scheduler setup.
    2. Is there any Sever side setup (Default server)

    Srinivas, Thanks for your quick reply.
    This is smartform, and sending the output as pdf, except the the first page on which I have the text to be printed on the email body. In this email body text I have to display an email.
    when user clicks on the email should open an outlook with the email id in the TO. Hope this helps.
    Thank you,
    Surya

Maybe you are looking for

  • [JTree]Block event?

    Hello, I've got a problem. In fact, i have a JFrame with on the left a JTree and on the right some JEditorPane and 3 JButton (New, Save, Cancel). When I clic on a JTree's Node, my JEditorPane are updated with desirated info. |-------------------|----

  • Totals differ from line items

    Hi, We are running report S_ALR_87013620 for a particular cost centre. When the total on the front screen for commitments is more than the total of the line items it displays. Any idea's???

  • Accessing loader's content using XML

    Hi, I've loaded an image into a loader from an XML file. Now I need to access that image to change it's X position. How do I go about doing this? I have used the debug to list all my objects, but my image is going to change whenever it loads a new on

  • QUestion about Java and GC

    Hello, I have a question regarding the garbage collection in java When can GC be called upon a class? Right now, I have a linked list of entities which when an entity is removed, it simply removes the reference of that monster (thus meaning the monst

  • How to direct commons-logging to jdev console instead of DefaultServer.log

    Hi, I have configured commons-logging in my adf 11g application. I added the following line to the commons-logging.properties file: org.apache.commons.logging.LogFactory=weblogic.logging.commons.LogFactoryImpl I have added the JDev11.1.1.1.0/modules/