OM base table columns

What is the diff betn these columns in OM base tables?
sold from org id
sold to org id
ship fom org id
ship to org id
invoice to org id
Thx!!

sold from org id --> This is organization from which you are selling and it'll be map to your organization_id
sold to org id ---> This is cust_account_id and will map to HZ Tables
ship fom org id ---> This is the organization froum which you actually ship goods and again coming from your organization_id from hr_all_organization_units
ship to org id ---> This is the site_use_id in again HZ Tables and ship to id of customer where you send your goods
invoice to org id---> This is the site_use_id in again HZ Tables and bill to id of customer where you send invoice for your goods
Understand the LInkage b/n below major tables on HZ
hz_parties
hz_cust_accounts
hz_cust_acct_sites_all
hz_party_sites
hz_cust_site_uses_all
hz_locations

Similar Messages

  • Query on Non-base-table column in form

    Hi,
    Does anyone have an example of code to allow users to query on non-base-table column from forms? For example, a personnel form displays a persons' name and department name. The form is based on PERSON table, which contains the department id, not the name. The form uses post-query to display the department name. When in query mode, the user wants to enter department name, and display the people in the department (still using this form, which is based on PERSON table.
    Thanks!

    Try this:
    For data block person set these properties as follows:
    1.Set Query Data Source Name = "person , departments"
    2.Set DML data target name = "person"
    3.Set Where Clause to join i.e. condition "person.dno = departments.dno"
    For filed department name set these properties as follows:
    1.Data base item = "Yes"
    2.Column Name = "departments.dname"
    3.Query Only = "Yes"
    4.Insert Allowed = "No"
    5.Update Allowed= "No"
    6.Keyboard Navigable = "No"
    If you face ambiguous column name check for the same filed name exist on both tables and set column name for this filed to person.filed_name
    Regards
    null

  • Sorting based on non-base table columns

    I have a form block based on X table. There are also some columns from Y table in the same block and the tables X and Y are joined through the appropriate columns. I want to sort the queried record in the block ( based on table X ) based on two columns that are present in the Y table. How do I do this? Any help would be highly appreciated. Ofcourse! we can create a view and achieve that. But I don't want to create a view. Also I can use select statement in the order by column. But it works if I select one column. But when I select two columns it says too many value. Any solutions

    why dont u create a function
    and sort by the returning values ?

  • Column in base table corresponds to column in view

    Hi,
    I have a view based on one table. I want to know the colum name of the view is corresponds to which column names in the base table. Showing the creation statement does not help because it has many colums and I cann't track this colum to which name.
    Please advise how to show this info....

    Just because the create statement is too hard for you doesn't mean that isn't, in fact, the way to find out. Try harder. Format the create statement - you'd be surprised how much it helps to put in indentation and carriage returns.

  • Need to know base table and base column name for Oracle view columns

    I am trying to load metadata for some views and that requires me to know what the final table and column name would be corresponding to the view column.
    For example, if I have a view x_v that is select a,b from x_v2; and x_v2 is a view that is select a,b,c from x;
    I need to get the following information.
    View View Col Base Table Base Col
    X_V A X A
    X_V B X B
    and so on.
    Is it possible to get this programmatically using any SYS schema tables or Dependency tables?
    I tried an indirect approach wherein I lock tables using LOCK TABLE or FOR UPDATE OF. But I'm not too sure if I can go down to the level of individual view columns.
    Can you help me with this?

    Thanks. I was looking at some indirect approaches.
    I came up with this script that does it faster than dependencies but thats just for tables and not column mapping.
    declare
    cursor bt(cp_sid number) is
    select u.name uname, o.name oname
    from sys.obj$ o, sys.user$ u
    where o.obj# in (select id1
    from v$lock
    where sid=cp_sid)
    and u.user# =o.owner#;
    cursor c_sid is
    select sid
    from v$session
    where audsid =userenv('sessionid');
    l_sid number;
    l_view varchar2(100):= 'PER_PEOPLE_V';
    l_schema varchar2(10):= 'APPS';
    begin
    open c_sid;
    fetch c_sid into l_sid;
    close c_sid;
    dbms_output.put_line('SID: '||l_sid);
    execute immediate 'lock table '||l_schema||'.'||l_view||' in row share mode nowait';
    for i in bt(l_sid) loop
    dbms_output.put_line(i.uname||'.'||i.oname);
    execute immediate 'alter table '||i.uname||'.'||i.oname||' disable table lock';
    execute immediate 'alter table '||i.uname||'.'||i.oname||' enable table lock';
    end loop;
    end;
    It basically uses locks on views to verify locks on the base tables.
    Just wondering, can we use FOR UPDATE OF statements to get to the columns?

  • How to order by a column not on the base table?

    Best explained by example:
    I have 1 block, base table is SALE. I would like to sort this block by PROD_DESCRIPTION which is not on SALE. I only have PROD_CODE (the primary key of PRODUCT which contains PROD_DESCRIPTION)
    I am not running Enterprise Edition so I cannot create a view and use Instead-of triggers.
    I would rather not have to re-write all my triggers because I want the default base table behaviour that forms provides.
    Any ideas?
    Cheers,
    Tim.

    Hey tim,
    I also had a similar problem.
    You need to create a function in the database with an associated
    pragma to specify the level of purity of the function
    WNDS (write no database state)
    WNPS (write no package state)
    PRAGMA RESTRICT_REFERENCES(fn_get_dname, WNDS, WNPS);
    Function fn_get_dname (p_empno in number) return varchar2 is
    v_dept_name varchar2(40);
    begin
    select dname into v_dept_name
    from dept, emp
    where dept.deptno = emp.deptno
    and emp.emp_no = p_emp_no;
    return v_dept_name;
    end;
    order by in a block based on the emp table (assuming you want a list of employees by department name)
    order by fn_get_dname(empno), empno
    Hope that will help you to solve your problem.
    Thanks
    Pranati

  • How to display records from base table as well as some other table?

    Hello expert,
    I have a requirement to develope a form described below:
    One control block and database block.
    DB block  is based on table T1 (USER, Table_name, Column_name, ACCESS);
    In control block, there are three fields,
    User, Table user will enter , and DB block will query based on control block fields(user, table_name).
    In table it is not necessary that all the columns of any table will be given.
    suppose there is a Table X consist of 10 column.
    Initially user give access for all the 10 columns through this form.
    if we query for user , table, all the record will come from table T1.
    now consider the case, when access given to table X number of columns were 10. after that 2 new columns added later.
    now there is no info of added column in table T1. i want if user query DB block, these newly added column must display in DB Block.
    Please help me out.
    Thanks
    Dhirender

    >i want if user query DB block, these newly added column must display in DB Block.
    You need to modify your form and add the two columns as base table items. Forms does not add two base table items by itself.

  • How to implement authorisation on table columns

    Can anyone suggest a smart way to use Weblogic platform capabilities to implement
    a table column security/authorisation "control". ie. control on a column by column
    basis who can view or update a column? Scenario - a primary data owner "owns"
    a set of records in a database, but would like to give (or delegate) selected
    access to groups of users to view and/or update the content of certain fields
    in the recordset.
    Seems like this is probably not that uncommon a requirement but can't seem to
    find any design patterns for this.

    Dean Tine wrote:
    Can anyone suggest a smart way to use Weblogic platform capabilities to implement
    a table column security/authorisation "control". ie. control on a column by column
    basis who can view or update a column? Scenario - a primary data owner "owns"
    a set of records in a database, but would like to give (or delegate) selected
    access to groups of users to view and/or update the content of certain fields
    in the recordset.
    Seems like this is probably not that uncommon a requirement but can't seem to
    find any design patterns for this.The first question is, if you are going through an application server
    why do you need to do anything clever at all? You can check the role of
    authenticated users and grant or deny access based on that (i.e. some
    dynamically generated SQL dependent on role)?
    If you really need support at the DBMS level, you can use SQL VIEWs.
    Create a view containing the appropriate columns and grant permissions
    to that view to the appropriate users. With an app server you will need
    multiple connection pools though and it quickly gets messy.
    Alternatively use stored procedures. Depending on your DBMS this might
    be required (if views aren't updatable) or could give better
    performance. Or worse performance.
    Robert

  • How to find real owner.table.column in a view

    This seems pretty easy but I haven't been able to locate a way using the dba_views or all_views to pinpoint the exact owner.table.column that a given view column is based on.
    I can retrieve the text of the view from dba_views, but I don't see something like all_tab_columns that has a second set of owner, table and column_name columns to show what the underlying column in a view is.
    e.g. create me.view zz as select a.acp,b.acno from tom.tab1 a, fred.tab2 b where a.key = b.key
    desc me.zz
    acp varchar2(4)
    acno number
    Now I would like to select something like the following from all_tab_columns:
    select column_name,orig_owner, orig_table, orig_column from all_tab_columns where owner = 'ME' and table_name = 'ZZ'
    acp tom tab1 acp
    acno fred tab2 acno
    Does such a view exist to extract this information?

    Robert,
    By hosed do you mean there is no way to get this information from an Oracle view? I'm not sure what you mean by sys.all_views.owner, that just tells the owner of the view itself, not the owner.table.column of each column in the view. If the view is all based on a single table then obviously I can figure out the information, but many/most views join several tables, even from different schemas.
    What I am looking for is the equivalent of all_view_columns which has view column information as well as the base table owner.table.column. -quinn

  • Automatically updating table column in OBIEE

    Hi folks,
    I have a requirement for say i have to update a table column based on a condition, but this update should happen on daily basis (i mean it should be scheduled once daily) by checking if any records in that column meets the condition then update it
    example :- column='Pending' then update it with 'Approved' . As transactions records comes on daily into the table.OBIEE should check and update the row so next time it doesnt show this row as 'Pending' .
    I have thought of 2 approaches for this
    1) Through writeback it is possible to update but manually ( the issue is it cant be automated or scheduled on daily basis and update multiple records on a go)
    2) Writing a stored procedure or function for update, but how can i accomplish this procedure to be scheduled or run once daily.how to use it?
    Any thoughts on the above two points or any method you guys can think off.
    Any help is appreciated !
    Cheers,
    KK

    Kranthi,
    This shud be easy...
    - Create a direct database request...with Update Statement
    eg: Update table set col = 'Approved' where col = 'Pending'
    - Create an ibot using the above DDR and schedule it on daily basis.
    This will update the full table with new value on daily basis based on the condition

  • Base table name for fields from Material Master

    Hi All,
    I want base table name which holds all possible values of following column:
    1)Material Master : X-plant matl status from tab -basic data 1
    2)Material Master: X-distr.chain status from tab -sales org 1
    for example: Base table for Prod.hierarchy is T179/T179T.
    Many thanks to all
    Yogesh

    Thanks Mahesh but I know its value available in MARA table for eery material. But i want to know where all possible distinct values are stored?... In other word, when we click on button which is next to this field and from that list we normally select value and then assign to above fields. Where this list is stored for
    X-plant matl status
    X-distr.chain status

  • What are the Target Base Tables for FA_TAX_INTERFACE table?

    Hi,
    We are using "upload tax book interface" program to update the Tax Book informaiton.
    For this we wanted to know all the Target Base Tables for FA_TAX_INTERFACE table (Specially for the ATTRIBUTE1-ATTRIBUTE15 columns of the interface table).
    Kindly request you to help on this.
    Thanks & Regards,
    Satvik Patel

    Well, what are you reconciling to? You are looking at something that seems to be different from your data extract, so what is that thing? My trouble shooting process is to take an asset that seems to be wrong and reconcile from the report/screen data to the extract data. You have to figure out what Oracle program is involved and what kind of SQL that the program is doing and what tables it is looking at. This could be an Oracle program error. I just ran into a problem on the Payables Posted Invoice Register report, where the total did not match my extract total. Turns out the report was wrong. If I had table records with a date/time stamp value (instead of just a date stamp value) in the accounting date field for the TO ACCOUNTING DATE value in my report request selection, those records were being dropped from the report. I reported this to Oracle support and found out that there is a patch to fix the problem (happens when cancelling an invoice) and a data script to follow to fix the historical data. So you have to keep an open mind. Yes, trying to find a reconciling issue can be very painful.
    My reaction is that you are looking at the right tables. There is also a FA_DISTRIBUTION_HISTORY table that you may want to look into, that links back to the FA_DEPRN_DETAIL table. Maybe your issue lies there. At least something to look at.
    John Dickey

  • Calculated non-base table field in a tabular form

    I am struggling with creating a non-base table calculated field in a tabular form in ApEx 3.1
    Can you point me in the right direction
    I thought this would be fairly easy to do, but I cant work out how to do it
    Requirements
    1) Tabular Form based on a table with QTY and PRICE columns
    2) TOTAL is a non-base table field, based on QTY * PRICE
    3) If the Qty or Price changes, the TOTAL should be re-calculated
    Example
    QTY   PRICE  TOTAL
    ===    =====  =====
    3       5          15
    10      50         500
    20      3           60
    Environment
    ApEx 3.1, Oracle 10 and Oracle 11 databases
    I recommended to upgrade to a newer version of ApEx but the request was rejected so Im stuck with 3.1

    Thanks, but its not the solution that I am after
    I am looking for a solution that will ...
           1) not require the calculated value TOTAL to be stored in the table
    and 2) re-calculate the TOTAL when I modify the dependent values (QTY and PRICE) before I save the changes to the database
    I am still looking for a solution if anyone can help

  • Base table changes

    i have a procedure which contains external table with 100 columns..
    data from this table is tranferred to temp table..
    any errors are caught here and if there are no errors then base table is merged with temp tables data..
    my problem is columns get added / removed and even data types are getting changed many times for bas table..
    what would be alternative for this???
    while inserting i have selected columns from ext table and then inserted coulmn wise in temp table
    regards
    avinash

    I agree with Blu. It makes no sense to hack permanent or base tables like that.
    Just how is the existing software (client software, queries, PL/SQL code, etc) to know how to deal with these new columns and data type changes? What about data integrity? Constraints? Foreign keys? Indexes? Etc. Etc.
    Relational design is not just a good idea. IT IS THE FUNDAMENTAL PRINCIPLE OF RELATIONAL DATABASES.

  • Indexed views using indexes on base table

    Hi all,
    CREATE VIEW Sales.vOrders
    WITH SCHEMABINDING
    AS
    SELECT SUM(UnitPrice*OrderQty*(1.00-UnitPriceDiscount)) AS Revenue,
    OrderDate, ProductID, COUNT_BIG(*) AS COUNT
    FROM Sales.SalesOrderDetail AS od, Sales.SalesOrderHeader AS o
    WHERE od.SalesOrderID = o.SalesOrderID
    GROUP BY OrderDate, ProductID;
    GO
    --Create an index on the view.
    CREATE UNIQUE CLUSTERED INDEX IDX_V1
    ON Sales.vOrders (OrderDate, ProductID);
    GO
    --This query can use the indexed view even though the view is
    --not specified in the FROM clause.
    SELECT SUM(UnitPrice*OrderQty*(1.00-UnitPriceDiscount)) AS Rev,
    OrderDate, ProductID
    FROM Sales.SalesOrderDetail AS od
    JOIN Sales.SalesOrderHeader AS o ON od.SalesOrderID=o.SalesOrderID
    AND ProductID BETWEEN 700 and 800
    AND OrderDate >= CONVERT(datetime,'05/01/2002',101)
    GROUP BY OrderDate, ProductID
    ORDER BY Rev DESC;
    In the above code block, Sales.SalesOrderDetail and Sales.SalesOrderHeader are base tables.
    Say suppose there are some indexes on some of the columns of these base tables. Are these indexes used when we write a query in which indexed view is mentioned
    in the from clause?
    Thanks, Srikar

    SO far as its a indexed view it wont use the indexes on base tables when you use it in a query as indexed view is persisted and exists as a physical object. SO it doent require definition to be substituted and data to be retrieved from the base objects.
    The indexes will come handy while populating the indexed view.
    Please Mark This As Answer if it solved your issue
    Please Vote This As Helpful if it helps to solve your issue
    Visakh
    My Wiki User Page
    My MSDN Page
    My Personal Blog
    My Facebook Page

Maybe you are looking for