OMBRETRIEVE is giving incorrect results

Hi my fellow OMBPLUS developers.
I have written an tcl script to retrieve the TARGET_LOAD_ORDERING property (a checkbox) from a number of mappings in my OWB repository. The commands which returns True or False is:
OMBRETRIEVE MAPPING '$Mapping Name' GET PROPERTIES (TARGET_LOAD_ORDERING)
The results are fine for around 90% of the mappings but I am finding cases where the following error is returned for some mappings:
OMB02918: Property TARGET_LOAD_ORDERING of <Mapping Name> does not exist: MMM1034: Property TARGET_LOAD_ORDERING does not exist.
When looking at the mappings that are throwing this error I can see via OWB that the mappings do have the Target Load Order checked. Simply unchecking/checking this and commiting the change to the repository then fixes the issue and the OMBRETIEVE commands retuns the correct result. Does anybody know why this issue is happening?
Any help would be most appreciated.
Regards
Mitesh

Re: OMBRETRIEVE is giving incorrect results
Posted: 23.02.2012 00:30 in response to: mi**** in response to: mi****
Click to edit this message... Edit Click to report abuse... Click to reply to this thread Reply
Hi,
Enable the “Use Target Load Ordering” configuration option in the mapping configuration.
http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/developer-tools/warehouse/owb-feature-management-licensing-344706.pdf
BR,
IM

Similar Messages

Query with Cost Center Hierarchy giving incorrect results

Hi All,
I have a universe built based on BEx query on Cost Center cubes. When enabling hierarchy in BEx Query and building Web intelligence Report based on the universe, I get incorrect results. The levels of the hierarchy is incorrect, many of the cost centers are missing etc. I checked the universe and confirmed that all levels of hierarchy are generated correctly. The Lov generated for these levels are correct and I see the complete hierarchy when using the BEx Variable in Universe for filtering.
I tried the same query with Hierarchy disabled with a different universe and it is providing correct results. Not sure what I'm missing here. Any inputs regarding this is appreciated.
Thanks & Regards,
Sree

Ingo, Thanks for your suggestion. Of course, I did update the Universe after any changes in the query. Tried different query setting related to hierarchy to make it work, but didn't many any difference and I get consistently incorrect results.
One thing what I wanted to confirm is, if there is any known bug in SP 2 Fix Pack 2.7 related to hierarchies. If not, it might be me doing some thing wrong and I will look into in more detail.
Thanks & Regards,
Sree

LessFilter and ReflectionExtractor API giving incorrect results

I am using Oracle Coherence version 3.7. We are storing DTO objects in cache having "modificationTime" property/instance variable of "java.util.date" type. In order to fetch data from cache passing "java.util.date" variable as input for comparison, LessFilter and ReflectionExtractor api's are used. Cache.entryset(filter) returns incorrect results.
Note: we are using "com.tangosol.io.pof.PofWriter.writeDateTime(int arg0, Date arg1) " api to store data in cache and "com.tangosol.io.pof.PofReader.readDate(int arg0)" to read data from cache. There is no readDateTime api available ?
We tested same scenario updating DTO class. Now it has another property in DTO of long(to store milliseconds). Now long is passed as input for comparison to LessFilter and ReflectionExtractor api's and correct results are retrieved.
Ideally, java.util.Date or corresponding milliseconds passed as input should filter and return same and logically correct results.
Code:
1) Test by Date: returns incorrect results
public void testbyDate(final Date startDate) throws IOException {
final ValueExtractor extractor = new ReflectionExtractor("getModificationTime");
LOGGER.debug("Fetching records from cache with modTime less than: " + startDate);
final Filter lessFilter = new LessFilter(extractor, startDate);
final Set results = CACHE.entrySet(lessFilter);
LOGGER.debug("Fetched Records:" + results.size());
assert results.isEmpty();
2) Test by milliseconds: returns correct results
public void testbyTime(final Long time) throws IOException {
final ValueExtractor extractor = new ReflectionExtractor("getTimeinMillis");
LOGGER.debug("Fetching records from cache with timeinMillis less than: " + time);
final Filter lessFilter = new LessFilter(extractor, time);
final Set results = CACHE.entrySet(lessFilter);
LOGGER.debug("Fetched Records:" + results.size());
assert results.isEmpty();
}

Hi Harvy,
Thanks for your reply. You validated it against a single object in cache using ExternalizableHelper.toBinary/ExternalizableHelper.fromBinary. But we are querying against a collection of objects in cache.
Please have a look at below code.
*1)* We are using TestDTO.java extending AbstractCacheDTO.java as value object for our cache.
import java.io.IOException;
import java.util.Date;
import com.tangosol.io.AbstractEvolvable;
import com.tangosol.io.pof.EvolvablePortableObject;
import com.tangosol.io.pof.PofReader;
import com.tangosol.io.pof.PofWriter;
* The Class AbstractCacheDTO.
* @param <E>
*            the element type
* @author apanwa
public abstract class AbstractCacheDTO<E> extends AbstractEvolvable implements EvolvablePortableObject {
    /** The Constant IDENTIFIER. */
    private static final int IDENTIFIER = 0;
    /** The Constant CREATION_TIME. */
    private static final int CREATION_TIME = 1;
    /** The Constant MODIFICATION_TIME. */
    private static final int MODIFICATION_TIME = 2;
    /** The version number of cache DTO implementation **/
    private static final int VERSION = 11662;
    /** The id. */
    private E id;
    /** The creation time. */
    private Date creationTime = new Date();
    /** The modification time. */
    private Date modificationTime;
     * Gets the id.
     * @return the id
    public E getId() {
        return id;
     * Sets the id.
     * @param id
     *            the new id
    public void setId(final E id) {
        this.id = id;
     * Gets the creation time.
     * @return the creation time
    public Date getCreationTime() {
        return creationTime;
     * Gets the modification time.
     * @return the modification time
    public Date getModificationTime() {
        return modificationTime;
     * Sets the modification time.
     * @param modificationTime
     *            the new modification time
    public void setModificationTime(final Date modificationTime) {
        this.modificationTime = modificationTime;
     * Read external.
     * @param reader
     *            the reader
     * @throws IOException
     *             Signals that an I/O exception has occurred.
     * @see com.tangosol.io.pof.PortableObject#readExternal(com.tangosol.io.pof.PofReader)
    @Override
    public void readExternal(final PofReader reader) throws IOException {
        id = (E) reader.readObject(IDENTIFIER);
        creationTime = reader.readDate(CREATION_TIME);
        modificationTime = reader.readDate(MODIFICATION_TIME);
     * Write external.
     * @param writer
     *            the writer
     * @throws IOException
     *             Signals that an I/O exception has occurred.
     * @see com.tangosol.io.pof.PortableObject#writeExternal(com.tangosol.io.pof.PofWriter)
    @Override
    public void writeExternal(final PofWriter writer) throws IOException {
        writer.writeObject(IDENTIFIER, id);
        writer.writeDateTime(CREATION_TIME, creationTime);
        writer.writeDateTime(MODIFICATION_TIME, modificationTime);
    @Override
    public int getImplVersion() {
        return VERSION;
import java.io.IOException;
import com.tangosol.io.pof.PofReader;
import com.tangosol.io.pof.PofWriter;
* @author nkhatw
public class TestDTO extends AbstractCacheDTO<TestIdentifier> {
    private Long timeinMillis;
    private static final int TIME_MILLIS_ID = 3;
    @Override
    public void readExternal(final PofReader reader) throws IOException {
        super.readExternal(reader);
        timeinMillis = Long.valueOf(reader.readLong(TIME_MILLIS_ID));
    @Override
    public void writeExternal(final PofWriter writer) throws IOException {
        super.writeExternal(writer);
        writer.writeLong(TIME_MILLIS_ID, timeinMillis.longValue());
     * @return the timeinMillis
    public Long getTimeinMillis() {
        return timeinMillis;
     * @param timeinMillis
     *            the timeinMillis to set
    public void setTimeinMillis(final Long timeinMillis) {
        this.timeinMillis = timeinMillis;
}*2)* TestIdentifier.java as key in cache for storing TestDTO objects.
import java.io.IOException;
import org.apache.commons.lang.StringUtils;
import com.tangosol.io.AbstractEvolvable;
import com.tangosol.io.pof.EvolvablePortableObject;
import com.tangosol.io.pof.PofReader;
import com.tangosol.io.pof.PofWriter;
* @author nkhatw
public class TestIdentifier extends AbstractEvolvable implements EvolvablePortableObject {
    private String recordId;
    /** The Constant recordId. */
    private static final int RECORD_ID = 0;
    /** The version number of cache DTO implementation *. */
    private static final int VERSION = 11660;
    @Override
    public void readExternal(final PofReader pofreader) throws IOException {
        recordId = pofreader.readString(RECORD_ID);
    @Override
    public void writeExternal(final PofWriter pofwriter) throws IOException {
        pofwriter.writeString(RECORD_ID, recordId);
    @Override
    public int getImplVersion() {
        return VERSION;
    @Override
    public boolean equals(final Object object) {
        if (object instanceof TestIdentifier) {
            final TestIdentifier id = (TestIdentifier) object;
            return StringUtils.equals(recordId, id.getRecordId());
        } else {
            return false;
     * @see java.lang.Object#hashCode()
    @Override
    public int hashCode() {
        return recordId.hashCode();
     * @return the recordId
    public String getRecordId() {
        return recordId;
     * @param recordId
     *            the recordId to set
    public void setRecordId(final String recordId) {
        this.recordId = recordId;
}*3) Use Case*
We are fetching TestDTO records from cache based on LessFilter. However, results returned from cache differs if query is made over property "getModificationTime" of type java.util.Date or over property "getTimeinMillis" of type Long(milliseconds corresponding to date). TestService.java is used for the same.
import java.io.IOException;
import java.util.Collection;
import java.util.Date;
import java.util.Map;
import java.util.Set;
import org.apache.log4j.Logger;
import com.ladbrokes.dtos.cache.TestDTO;
import com.ladbrokes.dtos.cache.TestIdentifier;
import com.cache.services.CacheService;
import com.tangosol.net.CacheFactory;
import com.tangosol.net.NamedCache;
import com.tangosol.util.Filter;
import com.tangosol.util.ValueExtractor;
import com.tangosol.util.extractor.ReflectionExtractor;
import com.tangosol.util.filter.LessFilter;
* @author nkhatw
public class TestService implements CacheService<TestIdentifier, TestDTO, Object> {
    private static final String TEST_CACHE = "testcache";
    private static final NamedCache CACHE = CacheFactory.getCache(TEST_CACHE);
    private static final Logger LOGGER = Logger.getLogger(TestService.class);
     * Push DTO objects with a) modTime of java.util.Date type b) timeInMillis of Long type
     * @throws IOException
    public void init() throws IOException {
        for (int i = 0; i < 30; i++) {
            final TestDTO dto = new TestDTO();
            final Date modTime = new Date();
            dto.setModificationTime(modTime);
            final Long timeInMillis = Long.valueOf(System.currentTimeMillis());
            dto.setTimeinMillis(timeInMillis);
            final TestIdentifier testId = new TestIdentifier();
            testId.setRecordId(String.valueOf(i));
            dto.setId(testId);
            final CacheService testService = new TestService();
            testService.createOrUpdate(dto, null);
            LOGGER.debug("Pushed record in cache with key: " + i + " modTime: " + modTime + " Time in millis: "
                + timeInMillis);
     * 1) Fetch Data from cache based on LessFilter with args:
     * a) ValueExtractor: extracting time property
     * b) java.util.Date value to be compared with
     * 2) Verify extracted entryset
     * @throws IOException
    public void testbyDate(final Date startDate) throws IOException {
        final ValueExtractor extractor = new ReflectionExtractor("getModificationTime");
        LOGGER.debug("Fetching records from cache with modTime less than: " + startDate);
        final Filter lessFilter = new LessFilter(extractor, startDate);
        final Set results = CACHE.entrySet(lessFilter);
        LOGGER.debug("Fetched Records:" + results.size());
        assert results.isEmpty();
     * 1) Fetch Data from cache based on LessFilter with args:
     * a) ValueExtractor: extracting "time in millis property"
     * b) java.Long value to be compared with
     * 2) Verify extracted entryset
    public void testbyTime(final Long time) throws IOException {
        final ValueExtractor extractor = new ReflectionExtractor("getTimeinMillis");
        LOGGER.debug("Fetching records from cache with timeinMillis less than: " + time);
        final Filter lessFilter = new LessFilter(extractor, time);
        final Set results = CACHE.entrySet(lessFilter);
        LOGGER.debug("Fetched Records:" + results.size());
        assert results.isEmpty();
    @Override
    public void createOrUpdate(final TestDTO testDTO, final Object arg1) throws IOException {
        CACHE.put(testDTO.getId(), testDTO);
    @Override
    public void createOrUpdate(final Collection<TestDTO> arg0, final Object arg1) throws IOException {
        // YTODO Auto-generated method stub
    @Override
    public <G>G read(final TestIdentifier arg0) throws IOException {
        // YTODO Auto-generated method stub
        return null;
    @Override
    public Collection<?> read(final Map<TestIdentifier, Object> arg0) throws IOException {
        // YTODO Auto-generated method stub
        return null;
    @Override
    public void remove(final TestDTO arg0) throws IOException {
        // YTODO Auto-generated method stub
Use Case execution Results:
"testbyTime" method returns correct results.
However, "testbyDate" method gives random and incorrect results.

Rownum giving Incorrect Result in 11gR2 but working ok in 10gR2

Hi All,
We have following query which is working fine in 10g but in 11g it is showing incorrect result.
select x.*,rownum from (select rat.rating_agency_id from bus_ca_cpty_rating rat,MST_CP_RATING mst
where rat.org_id=618
and
rat.rating_agency_id=mst.rating_agency_id
and
rat.rating_value=mst.rating_value
and
rat.heritage_system=mst.heritage_system
order by rat.rating_date,rat.rating_time)x
where rownum=1;
Result Without last Check <where rownum=1> in the query (in both 10g and 11g)
RATING_AGENCY_ID     ROWNUM
3     1
1     2
Result of the query in 11gR2 (11.2.0.3)
RATING_AGENCY_ID     ROWNUM
1     1
Result of the query in 10gR2 (10.2.0.3)
RATING_AGENCY_ID     ROWNUM
3     1
Request your help to resolve the issue(please tell me the bug name if it is a bug) and please let me know how it is processing the query in 11g.
Edited by: 906061 on Jun 19, 2012 2:22 AM

T.PD wrote:
906061 wrote:
Result Without last Check <where rownum=1> in the query (in both 10g and 11g)
RATING_AGENCY_ID     ROWNUM
3     1
1     2
Result of the query in 11gR2 (11.2.0.3)
RATING_AGENCY_ID     ROWNUM
1     1
Result of the query in 10gR2 (10.2.0.3)
RATING_AGENCY_ID     ROWNUM
3     1Your desired result depends on the wrong idea if implicid ordering of the results. there is no such!
Database does not sort returned rows any how (unless you use order by in your query). The order of returned rows may be consistent over a long period but if the table contents is reorganized or (as I assume) you import data to anotehr database the order may change.
To make the long storry short: you need another filter condition than <tt>rownum = 1</tt>.
bye
TPDLook closely: it looks like a standard top-n query with the order by in the sub-query.

Program is giving incorrect results

Hi all,
I am trying to use SAP_INFOCUBE_DESIGNS program to look at my infocube but eventhough my infocube is having data and its active the program is not listing the cube details and later i have deleted the data of a cube listed by the program and ran the program again, now it is still showing that cube details....
what could be the program.
thanks and regards
Neel

Hi Edwin,
Thanks a lot, as usual you are the best.
Nice to see you again.
Regards
Neel.

Goto link query is not giving exact results

Hi Folks
I am having issue with GOTO query.
My main query gives details of Employee seperation in particular year.
For this query i have goto query.
When i am checking the details of goto query ,it is giving incorrect results.
Your help is appreciated.
Thanks & Regards,
Hari Reddy

Hi Hari,
Check in RSBBS, whether you specified the receiver query correctly...
Check the link:
[http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/99/08629bd3e41d418530c6849df303c9/content.htm]
Hope this helps you.
Regards,
Yokesh.

Currency conversion issue in SPM. We are getting incorrect results with SPM conversion function from one of the document currency to USD.

Currently we are using SPM 2.0 version and we have been facing currency conversion issues.
Please help me in following aspects.
1) Where actually currency conversion happens in SPM. Is it the global program which does the conversion or other way.
2) We have conversion issue for one of the currency where conversion function is giving incorrect results when converting from one of the document currency to USD. here The respective document currency is considering the 1:1 ratio with Dollar which is actually incorrect.
3) We have verified in both BI side(currency tables) and even ECC side.
Please help me in understanding this issue and let me know if you need more information on this.
Its an production issue and appreciated your immediate inputs.
Thanks
Kiran

Hi Arun,
The following information may be helpful to you.The SSA_HELPER_PROGRAM has options regarding currency settings.
EXCH_RATE_TYPE: This flag governs the exchange rate type which will be used for currency conversion in data management. For example if RSXAADMIN contains an entry EXCH_RATE_TYPE = „ZSPM‟ then the conversion type used for currency conversion is ZSPM. The default value for the exchange rate type is „M‟. More details can be found in the note 1278988.
CURRENCYCONVERSION: By default data management converts all the measures in transaction currency to reporting currency and copies over to the corresponding measure in reporting currency. If the measure in reporting currency is already available in source it might be desirable to disable the currency conversion. To disable the conversion you can make an entry CURRENCYCONVERSION = „ „ in the table RSXAADMIN. This can also be achieved by running the program SSA_HELPER_PROGRAM with the option DEACTIVATE_CURRENCYCONVERSION. The conversion can be reactivated by running the same program with option ACTIVATE_CURRENCYCONVERSION.
UNITCONVERSION: Similar to above. To deactivate unit conversion you can use the program with option and DEACTIVATE_UNITCONVERSION and to reactivate ACTIVATE_UNITCONVERSION. By default both the conversions are switched on
EXTERNAL_CURRENCIES: Normally most of the international currencies are stored with two decimal places however certain currencies do have 0 and 1 decimal place too. For example JPY has 0 decimal places. SAP internal format stores even these currencies with 2 decimal places and at the time of display it changes the value to right decimal places. In case a file from external source is loaded to SPM it might have the format with 0 decimal places in the file. To convert it to SAP standard format post processing needs to be done on this value. If that is the case you can set the flat EXTERNAL_CURRENCIES = „X‟ in the table which will enable the post processing for these values. This flag can also be set and reset using the helper program using the option TURNON_EXT_CURRENCY_FORMAT and TURNOFF_EXT_CURRENCY_FORMAT.
Kind Regards,
John Harris
Senior Support Engineer, SAP Active Global Support

Incorrect result of multiplication for quantity fields,coverting LB to KG.

Hi All,
The requirement is to convert LB(pounds) to KG.The formula goes as follows.
l_ntgew = vbap-kwmeng   * w_mara-ntgew * l_zcazz .
l_brgew = vbap-kwmeng   * w_mara-brgew * l_zcazz .
where kwmeng = '1' is ordered quantity,w_mara-ntgew = '0.157' is the net weight from mara and l_zcazz ='0.454' is the conversion factor from LB to KG.
This information is for material mara-matnr = '100014609'
The result I am getting is l_ntgew = '71278.000' which incorrect.
Actual result is = '0.071278' .
Similar issues with l_brgew.
The same code works fine in a custom program but the requirement is to modify userexit 'userexit_check_vbap using us_dialog' within include 'MV45AFZB'.Here it fails completely. We have tried all types of field declarations, be it float or packed or ntgew_ap(quantity field).
Please help.Its urgent.Full points will be awarded to the correct solution.
Thanks,
Shamia.

VBAP-KWLMENG is a quantity field associated with unit VBAP-VRKME. (sales unit)
Try to use FM to convert quantithy from sale unit to base unit
        call function 'MD_CONVERT_MATERIAL_UNIT'
             exporting
                  i_matnr              = vbap-matnr
                  i_in_me              = vbap-vrkme
                  i_out_me             = mara-meins
                  i_menge              = vbap-kwlmeng
             importing
                  e_menge              = <qty in base unit>
             exceptions
                  error_in_application = 1
                  error                = 2
                  error_message        = 3
                  others               = 4.
Then multiply by <b>mara-ntgew</b> giving a result in unit <b>mara-GEWEI</b> then convert from this unit to KG. (same FM)
Regards

Oracle Discoverer report pulls incorrect result when scheduled.

Recently the database was migrated to 10.1.2 RAC from 9.2.0.6, so the discoverer EUL is now resides on new database.
after migration the report which pulls correct results when run interactively is pulling incorrect result when scheduled in Discoverer.
This report used sysdate and aggregate functions, i had ran the same report simultaneously( Directly in Discoverer Desktop/Plus and scheduled in discoverer), but the data retrieved in both case is not matching.
here is the query. any help is appreciated.
SELECT /*+ FIRST_ROWS */ A.SITE_ID as E175108,B."SYSTEM DESCRIPTION" as System_Prefix,
B."SYSTEM PREFIX" as System_Description,
COUNT(CASE WHEN ( TRUNC(SYSDATE)-DISCO10G.DATE_FORMAT_TEST(A.STATUS_DATE) ) < 0 THEN 1 ELSE TO_NUMBER(NULL) END) as Less_than_0_Days,
COUNT(CASE WHEN ( TRUNC(SYSDATE)-DISCO10G.DATE_FORMAT_TEST(A.STATUS_DATE) ) > 121 THEN 1 ELSE TO_NUMBER(NULL) END) as 0_to_14 Days,
COUNT(DECODE(TRUNC(( TRUNC(SYSDATE)-DISCO10G.DATE_FORMAT_TEST(A.STATUS_DATE) )/31),3,( TRUNC(SYSDATE)-DISCO10G.DATE_FORMAT_TEST(A.STATUS_DATE) ),to_number(NULL))) as 14_to_30_Days,
COUNT(DECODE(TRUNC(( TRUNC(SYSDATE)-DISCO10G.DATE_FORMAT_TEST(A.STATUS_DATE) )/31),2,( TRUNC(SYSDATE)-DISCO10G.DATE_FORMAT_TEST(A.STATUS_DATE) ),to_number(NULL))) as 31_to_60_Days,
COUNT(DECODE(TRUNC(( TRUNC(SYSDATE)-DISCO10G.DATE_FORMAT_TEST(A.STATUS_DATE) )/31),1,( TRUNC(SYSDATE)-DISCO10G.DATE_FORMAT_TEST(A.STATUS_DATE) ),to_number(NULL))) as 61_to_90_Days,
COUNT(CASE WHEN ( TRUNC(SYSDATE)-DISCO10G.DATE_FORMAT_TEST(A.STATUS_DATE) ) BETWEEN 15 AND 30 THEN 1 ELSE TO_NUMBER(NULL) END) as 91_to_120_Days,
COUNT(CASE WHEN ( TRUNC(SYSDATE)-DISCO10G.DATE_FORMAT_TEST(A.STATUS_DATE) ) BETWEEN 0 AND 14 THEN 1 ELSE TO_NUMBER(NULL) END) as 120_Days_Plus,
COUNT(TRUNC(SYSDATE)-DISCO10G.DATE_FORMAT_TEST(A.STATUS_DATE)) as Total
FROM PSTAGE.ALL_EQUIPMENT A,
( SELECT A.SITE "SYSTEM PREFIX", A.DESCRIPTION "SYSTEM DESCRIPTION", A.SITE_ID, B.SITE_DESCRIPTION, A.G2B_ID
FROM SITE_LIST A, ALL_CF_SITE_CONTROL B
WHERE A.SITE_ID = B.SITE_ID
ORDER BY 1, 3
) B
WHERE ( (B.SITE_ID = A.SITE_ID))
AND (A.EQUIPMENT_STATUS_CODE IN ('T','7'))
GROUP BY A.SITE_ID,B."SYSTEM DESCRIPTION",B."SYSTEM PREFIX"
ORDER BY B."SYSTEM DESCRIPTION" ASC ;
Thanks!

Hi sunil,
Rod is referencing the NLS parameters i.e.
Can you please let me know which NLS parameters you are referring toNLS parameters in this scenerio may be the date and language for that session.Do check out
SELECT * from NLS_SESSION_PARAMETERS
how i can check if there any differences in the NLS parameters when report is scheduled or run interactivelyI think you should run the trace file.Iam not sure about it.
It would be system_context.
Hope it helps you.
Kranthi.

BEx Query Providing Incorrect Results

I have two BEx queries that are behaving strangely.
They are providing incorrect results and I can't figure out why.
In both cases, when I save query in development under a different technical name the problem disappear.   I can't use this as a permanent solution because users insert queries in workbooks and we have portal links.
Is there a way to somehow fix these queries that
are acting strangely.
Query 1:
When run query get error message
"No roll storage space of length 120 available fro OCCURS area"
Query2:   Calculates Wrong Average
When run query:
Adding Cumulative Qty Customer Balance + Quantity Customer Movement
together.
Set Aggregation to Average
ref char Posting Period.
The avearge BEx calculates only considers Cummulative Quantity
End Customer Balance. It should consider consider Quantity Customer Movement as well.
Avg formula : ((Jan End - (.5* Jan Mov) ) + (Feb End - (.5* Feb Mov))+   (Mar End -(.5* March Mov)))/3
I have used the same methodology to calculate average with other queries and it average calculates correctly. These other queries have same InfoProvider and using the same dimensions as queries that are calculating average incorrectly.

Hi Mti
Thank you for your reply.
I have checked the details as per your suggestion:
1. KF Aggreagtion tab on Workbench Exception Aggregation is on SUM Summation.
2. RKF on The Query is on (Nothing Defined).
Is there anything else that can be checked?
Thank you

Incorrect result set with using isnull() function in IQ 16

Hi team,
We have IQ 16 on HP UX.
When we use isnull() function in where clause we get incorrect result set if we do not use column name in the result set.
In first select we get result with one row but in second one we get an empty result set.
select ID, dat_start, dat_end, dat_stop
from table_test
where ID=1105935925
and isnull(dat_stop,dat_start) <> dat_end
select ID
from table_test
where ID=1105935925
and isnull(dat_stop,dat_start) <> dat_end
It depends on number of row or volume of data in table, It is possible to use option Revert_To_V15_Optimizer to get the correct result.
Do you have any different idea how to solve it?
Thanks Milos.

We have tested two versions:
Sybase IQ/16.0.0.653/131122/P/sp03/ITANIUM/HP-UXi 11.31/64bit/2013-11-22 01:49:18
SAP IQ/16.0.0.807/140507/P/sp08/ITANIUM/HP-UXi 11.31/64bit/2014-05-07 21:11:45
Both versions have given same mistake.
We have not opened any support case for this issue because it is data depended issue. It is not easy to simulate it as an example.
Do you think we should open a support case for it?
Miloš

Rp_provide_from_last returns incorrect result

Hi
When issuing rp_provide_from_last for IT2001, we get incorrect result.
rp-provide-from-last p2001 space '19000101' '99991231'
This macro does not return the latest record. Instead it returns the record with the highest subtype #. (It actually returns the last record shown in a SE16N listing of PA2001).
Has anyone seen this problem?
We are on SAP 4.7., SP 85.
Best regards
Kirsten

Pleas Try this
Usage:
Only in PNP database reports under GET PERNR, because the personnel number for which data is being read comes from field PERNR-PERNR, while the field being used is PNP-SW-AUTH-SKIPPED-RECORD.
(RP_READ_ALL_TIME_ITY beg end)
   DATA: BEGDA LIKE P2001-BEGDA, ENDDA LIKE P2001-ENDDA.
   INFOTYPES: 0000, 0001, 0002, ...
                     2001 MODE N, 2002 MODE N, ...
     GET PERNR.
   BEGDA = '19900101'. ENDDA = '19900131'.
   RP_READ_ALL_TIME_ITY BEGDA ENDDA.
   IF PNP-SW-AUTH-SKIPPED-RECORD NE '0'.
      WRITE: / 'Authorization for time data missing'.
      WRITE: / 'for personnel number', PERNR-PERNR. REJECT.
   ENDIF.
Remarks
This RMAC module can be used when, for example, the time infotypes were originally defined in MODE N. This was done because the time data (from LOW-DATE to HIGH-DATE) might not all have fitted into the buffer. Now, however, they are read with shorter intervals (for example, in RPCALCx0 with payroll periods).
-Due to the large amount of data in HR, the infotypes 2000 u2013 2999 should not be read when GET PERNR occurs. Therefore, these infotypes are declared with the enhancement MODE N.
-As a result, the infotype tables under GET PERNR are not filled. The time infotype tables are filled subsequently using the macro RP_READ_ALL_TIME_ITY, but only for the time interval specified by PN-BEGDA and PN-ENDDA.
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_45b/helpdata/en/60/d8bb88576311d189270000e8322f96/content.htm
Best Regards

Subtracting two numbers in double format gives incorrect result

Hello,
I have a table with two fields in Number (Field Size: Double; Decimal Places: Auto). When using a query i try to subtract one field from the other I get incorrect results:
Field1
Field2
Result
2.60299223923846
2.60259423701324
3.98002225218796E-04
0.644498511499839
0.645908903902985
-1.41039240314556E-03
1.51021791504783
1.51372591514976
-3.50800010193808E-03
<tfoot></tfoot>
When I paste the above into Excel, I get the correct results:
Field1
Field2
Result
2.60299223923846
2.60259423701324
                     0.00039800222521880
0.64449851149984
0.64590890390299
                   (0.00141039240314556)
1.51021791504783
1.51372591514976
                   (0.00350800010193808)
Would much appriciate any help in how to get the correct values in Access Query.
Thank you

Field1
Field2
Result
2.60299223923846
2.60259423701324
3.98002225218796E-04
0.644498511499839
0.645908903902985
-1.41039240314556E-03
1.51021791504783
1.51372591514976
-3.50800010193808E-03
Hi Vasilii,
In my opinion the results are correct, only they are presented in scientific notation. You can do some formatting, to display the results the way you want.
See the Help on the use of Format.
Imb.

BI standard Querygiving incorrect results

Hi all,
I am working on FI and activated the BI content for FI AR and FI Gl and FI AP.
i have loaded the data sucessfully and it is reconsiling with R/3 at DATA TARGET level which is cube 0FIAR_C05
but when i run the standard query 0FIAR_C05_Q0001 i am getting incorrect results
Cube:
customer ! num of payments ! payment amt
426 ! 2 ! 10,000
Query result
426 ! 2 ! 100,000
This looks like a scaling error but i cant understand why a standar query has this issue,
is this a bug?
i know we can adjust the scaling factor but this will cause issues....
can some one advice me on this problem.
Thanks in advance
CG

Hi Praveen,
The scaling factor in the query says From key Figure
and in the properties of KF it says saling factor1
but this came as standard and i cant see the proper reason.
Thanks for ur quick reply

SQL Server 2014 - Columnstore Incorrect Results

Hello,
we are running into a problem with SQL Server 2014 and the columnstore index. We have a partitioned table with about 300 Million records in it. With SQL Server 2012 this has been in use without problems.
Since we upgraded to SQL Server 2014, the exact same queries on exactly the same data return incorrect results. We can only bypass the problem by either dropping the CS Index or adding a maxdop = 1 query hint.
I thought this was an old bug in SQL Server 2012? We have not installed the CU Pack 4 for SQL Server 2014, yet but will it solve the problem (assuming others have faced the same problem)
We are running: Microsoft SQL Server 2014 Enterprise Edition - 12.0.2000.8 (X64) on a 2x6Core Machine
Thanks in advance!

SQL Server 2012 only featured non-clustered columnstore indexes which were separate structures. Have you changed to a clustered columnstore (cs) index in SQL Server 2014? (ie dropped your non-clustered cs, created a cs)
There are a number of fixes that reference columnstore indexes in the current CUs (
CU1,
CU2, CU3,
CU4 ), but none which sound exactly like your problem.
This sounds similar and is fixed in CU1. You should review the CU documents yourself to see if any of them mention a similar problem and then consider applying the CU. You might also try applying them to a test environment, or a temporary Azure
VM for example to see if one of them solves your problem.
If you can create a reliable "repro" of the problem, consider raising a
connect item which is a Microsoft bug report.

OMBRETRIEVE is giving incorrect results

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for