On Change Total Amount Should come into Total
Hi Friend,
i am using Apex 3.2.
i have created an TAbular Form. there are four column Rate ,Qty and Total (INR) and Total ($) .
Here
Total(INR) = Rate * Qty
Total($) = Rate * Qty*45
i need when i enter any value in Rate and Qty then Rate * Qty and Rate * Qty*45 Should Come in to Total (INR) and Total ($) Column With Out Refresh .
i need It onchange Not OnBlur.
How Can i do this.
Thanks
Edited by: Vedant on Aug 18, 2011 9:30 PM
Hi
Try something like following
<script>
function makeAmount(pRow)
//Assuming column No as follows
//Qty = f01
//Rate = f02
//Amount (INR) = f03
//Amount ($) = f04
document.getElementsByName('f03')[pRow-1].value = ((document.getElementsByName('f01')[pRow-1].value * document.getElementsByName('f02')[pRow-1].value) );
document.getElementsByName('f03')[pRow-1].value = ((document.getElementsByName('f03')[pRow-1].value * 45 );
</script>And call this function on onChange event of Qty and Rate column by using onChange="makeAmount(#ROWNUM#);"
Zulqarnain
MaxApex Hosting
http://www.maxapex.com
Similar Messages
-
Difference between Two Date Should come into Text Item
Dear All,
i want to get difference between two date into text Item :P36_C in On Change java script.
i have two Date Item :P36_A and :P36_B .i have extract these date value from table then difference comes into Text Field :P36_C.
Now i want if i change Date into Item :P36_A or Item :P36_B then Defference between two date Should Come into Item :P36_C .
So i have use Java Script Code to do this
<script>
function diffdat(){
function getVal(item){
if($x(item).value != "")
return parseFloat($x(item).value);
else
return 0;
$x('P36_C').value =
getval((TO_DATE('P36_B', 'DD-MON-YYYY'))-
getval(TO_DATE('P36_A', 'DD-MON-YYYY')))+1;
</script>
i have put this into Item HTML Form Element Attributes
onChange="javascript:diffdat();"it's not woring .
How to work that Code with dates.
ThanksYou can always create your own difference function based on your own criteria. You can modify this to suit your needs.
CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION CALC_OFFICE_DAYS(date1 DATE, date2 DATE)
RETURN NUMBER
IS
v_begin_date DATE := date1;
v_end_date DATE := date2;
v_office_start_time VARCHAR2(10) := '09:30 AM';
v_office_end_time VARCHAR2(10) := '06:30 PM';
v_comp_begin_time DATE;
v_comp_end_time DATE;
v_days PLS_INTEGER := 0;
v_hrs NUMBER := 0;
v_ttltm NUMBER;
BEGIN
select trunc(v_end_date) - trunc(v_begin_date)
into v_days
from dual;
select to_date(to_char(sysdate,'DD-MM-YYYY')||' '||to_char(v_begin_date,'HH24:MI'),'DD-MM-YYYY HH24:MI')
into v_comp_begin_time
from dual;
select to_date(to_char(sysdate,'DD-MM-YYYY')||' '||to_char(v_end_date,'HH24:MI'),'DD-MM-YYYY HH24:MI')
into v_comp_end_time
from dual;
select (v_comp_end_time - v_comp_begin_time)/24 into v_hrs from dual;
IF v_hrs > 4 then
v_ttltm := v_days + .5;
ELSE
v_ttltm := v_days;
END IF;
return v_ttltm;
END;
As has been noted, this question is best posted on the PL/SQL forum. -
Updated record should come in txt file
Hi Friends,
My requirements like this way, any changes make in mara, mard, mbew, makt, vbak, vbap, vbrk and abrp table. that newly created data should come in .txt file of application server.
I have already developed a program for that. it is downloading data in every 3 hours slots. it is running in background. whatever changes made during these hours it will download.
now, my requirement has been changed, instance data should come in .txt file of app server. e.g. when newly created record save in database table, same time that record should come in .txt file with proper format.
is it possible? please let me know.
Thanks in advance,
ParagHi Parag,
To obtain changes you know you can get the details from the tables CDHDR and CDPOS.
Also you have questions about performance and so. SO here are some details.
- When you flag a data element for change document (is checked) it is ONLY a marker that allows for registration of this field's changes into CDHDR and CDPOS. The actual control is done on datafile level in its technical settings (Transaction SE11 with datafile name and then push button "Technical Settings" or CtrlShiftF9). Herein you will find a flag "Log data changes".
Within the CDHDR file and CDPOS file a field OBJECTCLAS is used. Only for existing OBJECTCLAS values the changes are logged.
- Now obvious this is the trick for standard SAP (as Subramanian has already pointed out you can find "OBJECTCLAS" values with transaction SCDO). If you want to know on how to create your own "OBJECTCLAS" values with working logging on your own designed fields follow Subramanian suggestion and read the documentation.
Now to your questions:
You gave some tables you need to track changes (and now also for initial creation) like MARA, MARD, MAKT and others.
To get changes for these tables use the following "OBJECTCLAS" values:
- MATERIAL (Tables MARA, MARC, MARD, MBEW, MFHM, MLGN, MLGT, MPGD, MPOP and MVKE). By-the-way, this object will be replaced by MATERIAL_N (available from release 4.6x).
- VERKBELEG (Tables VBAK, VBAP, VBEP, VBKD, VBLB, VBPA, VBPA2 and VBUK).
To collect changes (suggested by Andreas) you could use function module CHANGEDOCUMENT_READ. This is very usefull if also archiving is active for the objects you need to track changes for and your changes are scattered through time, but for your problem it is better to approach the log data directly.
1. First select the main change documents from CDHDR table for a given "OBJECTCLAS" and "OBJECTID". Here you can use additional filtering on DATE (field UDATE) and TIME (field (UTIME). Even filtering on a specific transaction is possible (field TCODE).
This gives you a number of change documents (field CHANGENR).
2a. Secondly select the specific field changes from table CDPOS by using the found fields from CDHDR and additionally fill TABNAME with the specific table and if required FNAME with the specific field name. 2b. Since in your case the values will not be known, you need to track changes, you have to be very carefull in your selections. If you track the object MATERIAL or MATERIAL_N, you best loop over the MARA table and for each MATNR fill the OBJECTID field of CDHDR with this MATNR value.
3. In order to find NEWLY created items you need to check the CHANGE_IND flag. When 'I' it is an new insert, when 'U' it is an update. Now this rule applies ONLY to key fields, since SAP first creates the key record (CHANGE_IND = 'I') and then the other fields (CHANGE_IND = 'U').
Finally the warning given by Andreas (runtime increases - you MUST select with OBJECTCLAS and OBJECTID) is very important. Not supplying OBJECTID will have a very heavy impact on the runtime.
Hope this gives you some clues on how to approach your problem.
Regards,
Rob. -
Modification date should come on PO Print out
Hi,
I want to show the Modification Dates on PO Print out.. means whenever we change in the PO, that modification date should show in the PO Printout. Is there any idea for do it...
NOTE: - Please note that I m using the copy of Standard Script MEDRUCK.
Regards,Hi,
Now in my PO printout, last date of changed PO is coming... i write a PERFORM in script with subroutine.
But i want all the modified dated...means whenever the PO has been changed, all dates should come on printout.
Please help me...My code is:----
FORM f_convert_changed TABLES in_par STRUCTURE itcsy
out_par STRUCTURE itcsy.
READ TABLE in_par WITH KEY c_ebeln_ekpo.
CHECK sy-subrc = 0.
l_ebeln = in_par-value.
SELECT udate
INTO date_c
FROM cdhdr
WHERE objectclas = 'EINKBELEG'
AND objectid = l_ebeln
AND tcode NOT LIKE 'ME21%'.
a = date_c+0(4).
b = date_c+4(2).
f = date_c+6(2).
CONCATENATE f b a INTO date_ch SEPARATED BY '.'.
READ TABLE out_par WITH KEY 'DATE_CH'.
CHECK sy-subrc = 0.
out_par-value = date_ch.
MODIFY out_par INDEX sy-tabix.
ENDSELECT.
ENDFORM. "f_convert_DATE
and PERFORM in Script is:----
/:DEFINE &DATE_CH&
/:PERFORM F_CONVERT_CHANGED IN PROGRAM ZPO_MEDRUCK1
/:USING &CDHDR-OBJECTCLAS&
/:USING &EKPO-EBELN&
/:CHANGING &DATE_CH&
/:ENDPERFORM
I1Changed Date : &DATE_CH&
Thanks... -
It states that it takes 24hrs for changes to come into effect. However, what does it mean that it may retain my review in the system indefinitely? So if I rate it 1 star by accident, and changed it to rate 5 stars, the 1 star rating is not removed?
Hi,
One of my ex-colleagues has installed a NI-DAQ 6.5 in our system. [And I do not see any other naitional instruments card in the CPU of the computer, may be he removed it] I deleted the account and all his files in the system. When I am trying to install version8.0, its not getting installed and giving me a message that I should uninstall the previous version by going to Add/Remove programs in the control panel.
I tried doing that, but the "Change/Remove" button does not seem to work...[There is no response and so unable to install the new version...]
Any idea how can this problem be solved?
It is a windowsXP operating system with SP2 installed on a machine with P4 processor.
Thanks -
Mail suddenly not being received from server. The ISP tells me there's nothing wrong at his end. I can see emails on the server if I look up WebMail; they don't come into Mail. I haven't changed anything lately. The incoming server details haven't changed; the Connection Doctor shows the accounts are connected; I've turned everything off including the modern. Have exhausted my limited knowledge. Anyone with something similar?
I have decided to dedicate this thread to the wonderful errors of Lion OSX. Each time I find a huge problem with Lion I will make note of it here.
Today I discovered a new treasure of doggie poop in Lion. No Save As......
I repeat. No Save As. In text editor I couldn't save the file with a new extension. I finally accomplished this oh so majorly difficult task (because we all know how difficult it should be to save a file with a new extension) by pressing duplicate and then saving a copy of the file with a new extension. Yet then I had to delete the first copy and send it to trash. And of course then I have to secure empty trash because if I have to do this the rest of my mac's life I will be taking up a quarter of percentage of space with duplicate files. So this is the real reason they got rid of Save As: so that it would garble up some extra GB on the ole hard disk.
So about 20 minutes of my time were wasted while doing my homework and studying for an exam because I had to look up "how to save a file with a new extension in mac Lion" and then wasted time sitting here and ranting on this forum until someone over at Apple wakes up from their OSX-coma.
are you freaking kidding me Apple? I mean REALLY?!!!! who the heck designed this?!!! I want to know. I want his or her name and I want to sit down with them and have a long chat. and then I'd probably splash cold water on their face to wake them up.
I am starting to believe that Apple is Satan. -
I have a new MacBook Air 11'inch and I presume that it should come with the iLife programs. However, when I signed into the appstore with my account I have used with all of my Mac products, it now said I had to purchase each program, like iPhoto, iMovie, ect. seperate. I have already logged in and out of my account and called the "free" part of tech support. How can I reslove this issue?
Welcome to Apple Support Communities
If you really have a new MacBook, iPhoto, iMovie and GarageBand come with the Mac for free.
As you see their price at the Mac App Store, it's clear that there's a problem with your MacBook. Simply return it if you purchased it less than 14 days ago and you will receive a new MacBook -
Excise amounts should not be changed after IEI
Once Incoming excise invoice is completed, one should not be allowed to change excise amounts in the A/P Invoice. This creates to a lot of problems. This posts different amounts in the cenvat clearing amount at the time of IEI and then at the time of A/P Invoice, thus creating reconciliation problems...
done using query...
-
Re: Whence should come the frameworks?
At 03:44 PM 6/20/98 +0200, Daniel Nguyen wrote (on the polymorphic
polymorphism thread:
Is it a battle between Forte and Sage ?One hopes not, but this reminds me of an interesting question that I would
like to throw out for comment. With any product like Forte, any given
release can only cover so much. Some of what it does not include is core
infrastructure and for that one has simply to work around or wait. But,
there is also a lot which it does not cover which is within the scope of
others to provide. This is particularly apparent in the case of Express
and Conductor where one can clearly extend that which comes from Forte or,
to be more extreme, one can offer an alternative, especially in the case of
Express.
These extensions and alternatives are really a necessary part of getting
work done, but for those with a mind to it, they also present a business
opportunity, either for direct sale to other Forte shops or as a part of
the value-add in a consulting agreement. But, as one moves on to
subsequent releases, there is a natural tension which arises because Forte
is likely to incorporate some of these same extensions into the product.
E.g., various frameworks have provided security components, but R4 will
have its own security component. Forte is also likely to provide
extensions to Express which are not already in a competing framework and
users of that framework will then not benefit automatically by that
extension unless the framework provider works to include the extension as
well.
My impression, correct or not, is that most framework providers are
offering their products as alternatives to Express and, as such, are
essentially competing with future versions of Express. I.e., in the
current release, one can argue that the competing framework is a better
foundation, but if future versions of Express make substantial strides, as
seems to be the expectation, then the providers of that framework have the
difficult task of making equal or greater strides in order for it to
continue to be the case that their offering is still arguably better.
At least one company, DS Data, has taken the alternate position of layering
their products on Express and Conductor. This would seem to put their
users in a somewhat better growth position since future extensions to
Express should be fairly easily incorporated, either by replacing the
previously external component or simply by being added to what is
available. One might argue that this graceful growth potential has been
achieved at the compromise of having to accept the Express and Conductor
foundations as given, but the importance of this is something we each will
have to judge for ourselves. But, even DS Data has the risk that Express
and/or will advance so rapidly as to take over all of the added features
and functionality now provided by their extensions. Their customers should
be OK since this will simply that the extensions are subsumed into the
core, but it does mean that they either lose a product in the future or
have the challenging task of continuing to stay meaningfully ahead.
It seems clear that the more that comes from Forte itself, the more the
Forte community as a whole benefits so I would hope that no one would
advocate that Forte curtail its framework development in order to leave
that market open for the partners. But, if Forte does proceed agressively
on framework development, then, to some extent, it is competing with
partners that provide frameworks. Moreover, as partners do create core
functionality like frameworks, they are creating things which would benefit
the Forte community as a whole, but they cannot expect the whole community
to purchase their framework. I.e., Company X may have some piece of their
framework which is particularly useful, but Company Y has something else
and neither are integrated with Express which one may have chosen if for no
other reason than to stay in optimal tune with what Forte is doing. As
things stand, unless these pieces can be componentialized and the companies
involved are willing to offer them as such as separate products, the only
way the Express user has of getting this functionality is to develop it
themselves or wait for Forte to add it to Express.
What I would like to ask, then, is what people think of what it is that
Forte could do to make this overall structure work better? Not that I see
it as working badly, especially compared to some other environments that I
have seen, but just that there are some real problems without obvious easy
answers.
=========================================================================
Thomas Mercer-Hursh, Ph.D email: [email protected]
Computing Integrity, Inc. sales: 510-233-9329
550 Casey Drive - Cypress Point support: 510-233-9327
Point Richmond, CA 94801-3751 fax: 510-233-6950
To unsubscribe, email '[email protected]' with
'unsubscribe forte-users' as the body of the message.
Searchable thread archive <URL:http://pinehurst.sageit.com/listarchive/>Thomas,
I think you have brought up a really good question and one that deserves
some attention by all:
customers, partners and Forte. The advent of third-party tools for the
Forte marketplace is an interesting prospect. If I take my companies
product (SCAFFOLDS), the original impetus for building such a thing, was not
to offer an alternative to Forte Express, but to offer an alternative to
building applications with raw Forte. And as such, we have not targeted,
feature compared or analyzed Forte Express to help build or sell any part of
our product.
I think the reason for this is that many of us in the framework business do
not see ourselves as having a competing product to Forte Express. The
reason for this is that we have taken on applications with our products that
Forte themselves would not pitch Express at. The architectural descriptions
in SCAFFOLDS have been used to do everything from simple to very complex GUI
development to Database persistence or communications to satellites.
Because of this, there is some overlap of functionality, but certainly we
see Forte Express being used for a much more limited class of application.
I would question the assertion that it is good for Forte to build more. I
think Forte, like any company, has a limited amount of engineering muscle.
With this muscle they should be concentrating on their core products that
make the company profitable. If I look at their product line-up, clearly
the Forte Development Tool is the make or break product. They should rely
more on the marketplace to provide solutions for things that are outside of
their core products. I sort of take the opposite tact. It seems clear that
the more a third party marketplace finds outlets for their solutions the
more diverse solutions we are likely find in that marketplace. As an
example, if you look at the Visual Basic marketplace, clearly it is big with
many, many solutions because Microsoft defined some specs for add in
components and let the marketplace provide solutions.
I think Forte could spend more time opening up their tool for additions by
third-party vendors. For example, things like object introspection, an open
repository and dynamically adding widget types would do wonders for the
number and kinds of solutions that would exist in the Forte marketplace
today if this was done a version or two ago. Instead, I think Forte spent
much of their engineering muscle on other kinds of products, like Forte
Express. Whether this strategy will pay of for them remains to be seen, but
certainly if they enter the Java world, they will have to change their
current strategy with regard to support to third-party solutions. The Java
marketplace is very diverse today and Forte will have to allow more
third-party integration to be taken seriously in that market.
Mark Perreira
Sage IT Partners.
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[<a href="mailto:[email protected]">mailto:[email protected]]On</a> Behalf Of Thomas Mercer-Hursh,
Ph.D.
Sent: Saturday, June 20, 1998 11:19 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Whence should come the frameworks?
At 03:44 PM 6/20/98 +0200, Daniel Nguyen wrote (on the polymorphic
polymorphism thread:
Is it a battle between Forte and Sage ?One hopes not, but this reminds me of an interesting question that I would
like to throw out for comment. With any product like Forte, any given
release can only cover so much. Some of what it does not include is core
infrastructure and for that one has simply to work around or wait. But,
there is also a lot which it does not cover which is within the scope of
others to provide. This is particularly apparent in the case of Express
and Conductor where one can clearly extend that which comes from Forte or,
to be more extreme, one can offer an alternative, especially in
the case of
Express.
These extensions and alternatives are really a necessary part of getting
work done, but for those with a mind to it, they also present a business
opportunity, either for direct sale to other Forte shops or as a part of
the value-add in a consulting agreement. But, as one moves on to
subsequent releases, there is a natural tension which arises because Forte
is likely to incorporate some of these same extensions into the product.
E.g., various frameworks have provided security components, but R4 will
have its own security component. Forte is also likely to provide
extensions to Express which are not already in a competing framework and
users of that framework will then not benefit automatically by that
extension unless the framework provider works to include the extension as
well.
My impression, correct or not, is that most framework providers are
offering their products as alternatives to Express and, as such, are
essentially competing with future versions of Express. I.e., in the
current release, one can argue that the competing framework is a better
foundation, but if future versions of Express make substantial strides, as
seems to be the expectation, then the providers of that framework have the
difficult task of making equal or greater strides in order for it to
continue to be the case that their offering is still arguably better.
At least one company, DS Data, has taken the alternate position
of layering
their products on Express and Conductor. This would seem to put their
users in a somewhat better growth position since future extensions to
Express should be fairly easily incorporated, either by replacing the
previously external component or simply by being added to what is
available. One might argue that this graceful growth potential has been
achieved at the compromise of having to accept the Express and Conductor
foundations as given, but the importance of this is something we each will
have to judge for ourselves. But, even DS Data has the risk that Express
and/or will advance so rapidly as to take over all of the added features
and functionality now provided by their extensions. Their
customers should
be OK since this will simply that the extensions are subsumed into the
core, but it does mean that they either lose a product in the future or
have the challenging task of continuing to stay meaningfully ahead.
It seems clear that the more that comes from Forte itself, the more the
Forte community as a whole benefits so I would hope that no one would
advocate that Forte curtail its framework development in order to leave
that market open for the partners. But, if Forte does proceed agressively
on framework development, then, to some extent, it is competing with
partners that provide frameworks. Moreover, as partners do create core
functionality like frameworks, they are creating things which
would benefit
the Forte community as a whole, but they cannot expect the whole community
to purchase their framework. I.e., Company X may have some piece of their
framework which is particularly useful, but Company Y has something else
and neither are integrated with Express which one may have chosen
if for no
other reason than to stay in optimal tune with what Forte is doing. As
things stand, unless these pieces can be componentialized and the
companies
involved are willing to offer them as such as separate products, the only
way the Express user has of getting this functionality is to develop it
themselves or wait for Forte to add it to Express.
What I would like to ask, then, is what people think of what it is that
Forte could do to make this overall structure work better? Not that I see
it as working badly, especially compared to some other environments that I
have seen, but just that there are some real problems without obvious easy
answers.
=========================================================================
Thomas Mercer-Hursh, Ph.D email: [email protected]
Computing Integrity, Inc. sales: 510-233-9329
550 Casey Drive - Cypress Point support: 510-233-9327
Point Richmond, CA 94801-3751 fax: 510-233-6950
To unsubscribe, email '[email protected]' with
'unsubscribe forte-users' as the body of the message.
Searchable thread archive <URL:<a href=
"http://pinehurst.sageit.com/listarchive/">http://pinehurst.sageit.com/listarchive/</a>>
>
To unsubscribe, email '[email protected]' with
'unsubscribe forte-users' as the body of the message.
Searchable thread archive <URL:<a href=
"http://pinehurst.sageit.com/listarchive/">http://pinehurst.sageit.com/listarchive/</a>> -
Vendor debit balance should come in sundry debtor balance
Hi, Gurus
My problem is that my client wants that if a vendor has debit balance than it should be treated as sundry debtor (Current Asset) and balance should come in sundry debtor reco. GL, similarly if a Customer has credit balance than it should be treated as sundry creditor (Current liability) and it should come in to sundry creditor balance.SAP provides overall debit/credit balance of Reco. Gl, my requirement is per vendor/customer wise i,e if Mr. X is a vendor and he has credit balance of say Rs.1000/- than its ok but another vendor say Mr. Y has debit balance of Rs. 7000/- than it should come in sundry debtor GL, what SAP is doing it will show debit balance in sundry creditor Reco. GL.
Please help me and provide appropriate solution.
Thanks & Regards
AnurajHi ,
you need to perform closing operations for Accounts Recievable /Payable to achieve your client requirement.
Please read below SAP help.
Customers in Credit and Vendors in Debit
A credit balance on a customer account should be displayed as a payable; conversely, a debit balance on a vendor account should be displayed as a receivable. If such a situation arises, the program makes the appropriate adjustment postings automatically.
To do this, the system determines the total for each account and reconciliation account. This guarantees that special G/L transactions, for example down payments and bills of exchange are displayed separately from the payables and receivables. Accounts with the same consolidation company ID are considered together.
The receivables account in the figure above identifies a credit balance of $2000 for Customer 3. This payable is to be displayed in the balance sheet under the item "Other payables". You therefore transfer the amount to the account of that name. The receivables account is adjusted by a posting to the adjustment account.
Prerequisites
Since you cannot post to the reconciliation accounts directly, the system makes adjustment postings for you. You should display the reconciliation account and the adjustment account under the same balance sheet item. The system posts the offsetting entry to a G/L account, under which the payable (or receivable) is now displayed in the balance sheet. You must have defined the account numbers for the adjustment accounts and the accounts for the offsetting entries in the system already. The posting keys are already defined in the standard system.
To define the account numbers, select the activity Define adjustment acts for reclassifying payabl./receivables in the Accounts Receivable and Accounts Payable Implementation Guide.
Regards,
Lakshmu -
When I send an email the rely comes into another account in my apple email. How do I set it so that my email comes to the correct address?
Hi Sunny C,
Welcome to the Support Communities! The "From" field should be showing by default, but you can check or change your settings for Mail with the instructions below:
Mail (Yosemite): Set Mail preferences
http://support.apple.com/kb/PH19178
In the Composing pane, you can set the email account that you want to send new messages from.
Also, check the View command on the Menu bar. View > Message Attributes should have a checkmark beside the "From" field.
Cheers,
Judy -
Allow to change Tax Amounts in A/R Invoice
Hi Experts
I am using Sap B1 2007 . It allows me to change Tax Amount (Tax Amount Distribution Screens) in case of Excise Invoices in A/R Invoice but not in Service Tax Invoices . Why is it so.
ThanxHello,
In the Sales A/R module we can not change any tax amount.
But you can change in Purchase A/P module in any tax amount.
This is best business practices according to SAP.
because when we received the materials then need to round the tax amount and it is totally depend on vendor invoice so it will never fixed for same.
I also need some time adjustment we client make GRPO .
But when we make Sales document then we can fixed rounding for all tax code.
Thanks
Manvendra Singh Niranjan -
Is there anyway to change the amount of Wireless B...
I think I know what the answer is but here goes:-
Is there anyway to change the amount of Wireless Bandwidth given to a certain device from the HH3??
The reason why I ask is, that I have a number of devices that connect to my wireless connection and for some reason my Apple TV only connects at 65Mbps thus making it virtually impossible to stream videos to it. (videos are choppy on it)
When I look in the 'Home Network' section on the HH3, it shows that my Apple TV has connected at 65 Mbps - the device has a 'N' network adaptor built-in, so in theory it should connect at a faster speed.
Is there anyway that I can increase the connection speed for this device - my laptop connects at 144 Mbps....ady199 wrote:
I think I know what the answer is but here goes:-
Is there anyway to change the amount of Wireless Bandwidth given to a certain device from the HH3??
The reason why I ask is, that I have a number of devices that connect to my wireless connection and for some reason my Apple TV only connects at 65Mbps thus making it virtually impossible to stream videos to it. (videos are choppy on it)
When I look in the 'Home Network' section on the HH3, it shows that my Apple TV has connected at 65 Mbps - the device has a 'N' network adaptor built-in, so in theory it should connect at a faster speed.
Is there anyway that I can increase the connection speed for this device - my laptop connects at 144 Mbps....
Hi there,
First off, what I would suggest is that you download either inssider 2 if you're on a PC or istumbler if you're using a Mac and check for other wireless networks around you that could be causing interference and change to a less congested channel, if need be.
If the above doesn't help, then I'd suggest that you look into replacing your router with another one, which has QOS such as the Netgear WNDR3700 which has Dual band (2.4GHz and 5GHz 802.11n) so that you can prioritise bandwidth for your different pieces of kit.
I Hope this info helps.
** Edited to correct typos ** -
Nokia E51 bug with come into menu
I got so bug: when I've opened *.doc file from memory card and it is opened in tray for one day non-stop, I can't come into the menu. The menu got to hang. 3 times I gave the phone to guarantee, but any time they fixed it.I thought the problem depends on a size of a memory card, but I changed the card from 4 GB to 2 GB and problem still is. What to do now?
hi.
same problem with my phone too.
local service center even changed with the new one (the first one was used just 3-4 days and had hanged in pressing 'Menu' 3 times during that period). The new one was ok first 2 days then it hanged. I thought this could be due a memory card size, which was 1GB. Removing the card seemed be solution of the problem till it got hanged after 5 days this time .
It's funny to have new mobile phone behaving this way.
what could be proposed, and what should be done to remedy this problem?
shall I ask for change of the device once more? -
INR should come on the top , not in every row...
Dear Experts,
I am facing an onother issue. The issue seems very simple but a m nt able to solve it.
In service report ,
Net Income
540,000.00 INR
243,000.00 INR
But in Sales Report,
Net Sales
INR
3,718,710.31
16,057,490.72
In above service report the data should come like the Sales Report. I am able to change it only for my system, but i am not able to do it Globally.
In the report , Net Income --> Right click --> properties --> Display --> Display scaling factors for key figures..
In such a way I am getting the value like ,
Net Income
INR
540,000.00
243,000.00
But the problem is , its not applicable for the global users.
Please put some light .
Thanks,
SanjanaHi Chandu,
If I change in the following way :
In the report , Net Income --> Right click --> properties --> Display --> Display scaling factors for key figures..
For that time I am able to see the report like
Net Income
INR
540,000.00
243,000.00
But If I start after putting transaction RRMX , then its showing like ,
Net Income
540,000.00 INR
243,000.00 INR
This means its not getting stored . What should I do ?
Please put some light .
Thanks,
Sanjana
Maybe you are looking for
-
I am trying to write a function called parens that will allow me to do this. Say I have a simple string " (a+(x) * (6 + 14) - q7) then if I call parens it will produce this result (x) (6+14) (a + (x) * (6 + 14) - q7) the input that I get for this met
-
In Aperture 3 when I right click on an image I am able to 'create new version from original' which suggests that the original is there. When I try to export the original I only get a .jpg with the XMP file. These particular images are from 2010, has
-
reminders do not work on pc (windows 7) stopped working in outlook 2010 after icloud installed
-
JDBC Driver for Personal Oracle 7.0
I have Personal Oracle 7.0 setup on my PC. I need to install JDBC driver for it. Where Can I get it? Thanks.
-
I recently got someone to purchase a mac mini from an authorized apple store 6 months ago. and on apples site they say that it cfomes with 512mb of RAM.ive talked to apple about this and they wont help me....yet my computer says its only got 256 of R