Oracle parameter warning
Hi All,
I got these database profile warning in the dbcheck.
BR0978W Database profile alert - level: WARNING, parameter: OPTIMIZER_FEATURES_ENABLE, value: 10.2.0.4 (set in parameter file)
BR0978W Database profile alert - level: WARNING, parameter: STATISTICS_LEVEL, value: TYPICAL (set in parameter file)
We are using oracle 10.2.0.4. Why are these warning keep poping out in the log?
Many thanks
Lauran
BR0978W Database profile alert - level: WARNING, parameter: OPTIMIZER_FEATURES_ENABLE, value: 10.2.0.4 (set in parameter file)
BR0978W Database profile alert - level: WARNING, parameter: STATISTICS_LEVEL, value: TYPICAL (set in parameter file)
You need to set these parameters setting in DB17 tcode. check below link
DB check warnings & errors
Thanks
Sushil
Similar Messages
-
Oracle Parameter Recommedation
Dear Oracle Experts,
I have upgraded Oracle 10204 to 10205 and now i want to alter the oracle parameter while system Specs is:
Processors: x3690 X5, Xeon 8C E7-2820 105W 2.00GHz with 2 Processor
RAM: 32 GB
current initSID.ora
prd.__db_cache_size=738197504
*._OPTIM_PEEK_USER_BINDS=FALSE
*.compatible='10.2.0'
*.control_file_record_keep_time=30
*.db_block_size=8192
*.db_cache_size=4294967296
*.db_files=254
*.db_name='PRD'
*.dml_locks=4000
*.event='10191 trace name context forever, level 1'
*.FILESYSTEMIO_OPTIONS='setall'
*.job_queue_processes=1
*.log_buffer=1048576
*.log_checkpoint_interval=0
*.log_checkpoints_to_alert=true
*.open_cursors=800
*.optimizer_features_enable='10.2.0.1'
*.parallel_max_servers=160
*.pga_aggregate_target=629145600
*.processes=280
*.sessions=560
*.sga_max_size=5368709120
*.shared_pool_reserved_size=72461844
*.shared_pool_size=724618444
*.sort_area_retained_size=0
*.sort_area_size=2097152
*.statistics_level='typical'
*.undo_management='AUTO'
*.undo_retention=43200
*.undo_tablespace='PSAPUNDO'
*.user_dump_dest='G:\oracle\PRD\saptrace\usertrace'
*.workarea_size_policy='AUTO'
there are may parameters are not configure with respect to SAP Note 830576 - Parameter recommendations for Oracle 10g.
while my system is OLTP(SAP ECC 6.0) and please give me your expert suggestion with respect to 10.2.0.5 about following parameters.
STAR_TRANSFORMATION_ENABLED
_FIX_CONTROL
EVENT
_INDEX_JOIN_ENABLED
DB_FILE_MULTIBLOCK_READ_COUNT
OPEN_CURSORS
OPTIMIZER_INDEX_COST_ADJ
PARALLEL_THREADS_PER_CPU
PGA_AGGREGATE_TARGET
SHARED_POOL_SIZE
_FIRST_SPARE_PARAMETER
Regards,hi Deepkorri,
please confirm me...
the result of that script is:
INFORMATION 1 *** Parametercheck for Oracle 10.2. based on Note/Version: 830576/221
INFORMATION 2 *** Parametercheck last changed: 2011-12-22
INFORMATION 3 *** Parametercheck Execution: 2012-02-06 14:49:10
INFORMATION 4 *** DB Startup: 2012-02-04 18:00:16
INFORMATION 5 *** DB SID: PRD
INFORMATION 6 *** DB Environment: OLTP, not RAC
INFORMATION 7 *** DB Platform: Microsoft Windows x86 64-bit
INFORMATION 8 *** DB Patchset: 10.2.0.5.0
INFORMATION 9 *** Last detectable DB Mergefix: from SAP Bundle Patch (released 2011-06-10)
INFORMATION 10 *** Reliability checks: events passed, fixcontrols passed
INFORMATION 11 *** WARNING: Extended support for 10.2.0.5 only available with a special extended support contract (note 1431752)
there are main four columns(Name, Recommendation, IS_VALUE, SHOULD_BE_VALUE) in Result of the SELECT statement
now I have to change the parameter value according Recommendation.
Recommendation Columns consists value with
OK mean I have no need to change it
Automatic Check OK mean ?
IS_VALUE mean current value?
SHOULD_BE_VALUE mean must this value?
_fix_control (5099019) add with value "5099019:ON" 5099019:ON
_fix_control (5705630) add with value "5705630:ON" 5705630:ON
_fix_control (5765456) add with value "5765456:3" 5765456:3
_fix_control (6055658) add with value "6055658:OFF" 6055658:OFF
_fix_control (6399597) add with value "6399597:ON" 6399597:ON
_fix_control (6430500) add with value "6430500:ON" 6430500:ON
_fix_control (6440977) add with value "6440977:ON" 6440977:ON
_fix_control (6626018) add with value "6626018:ON" 6626018:ON
_fix_control (6670551) add with value "6670551:ON" 6670551:ON
_fix_control (6972291) add with value "6972291:ON" 6972291:ON
_fix_control (7692248) add with value "7692248:ON" 7692248:ON
_fix_control (7891471) add with value "7891471:ON" 7891471:ON
_fix_control (9196440) add with value "9196440:ON" 9196440:ON
_fix_control (9495669) add with value "9495669:ON" 9495669:ON
_fix_control (4728348) check if default value " " is suitable (set to 4728348:OFF if Winbundle<=5) set to 4728348:OFF if Winbundle<=5
_fix_control (6120483) ok (is not set; mentioned with other prerequisites/not mentioned in note)
_fix_control (6221403) ok (is not set; mentioned with other prerequisites/not mentioned in note)
_fix_control (6329318) ok (is not set; mentioned with other prerequisites/not mentioned in note)
_fix_control (6660162) ok (is not set; mentioned with other prerequisites/not mentioned in note)
_fix_control (7325597) ok (is not set; mentioned with other prerequisites/not mentioned in note)
event
event (38087) add with value "38087 trace name context forever, level 1" 38087 trace name context forever, level 1
event (10183) add with value "10183 trace name context forever, level 1" 10183 trace name context forever, level 1
event (10027) add with value "10027 trace name context forever, level 1" 10027 trace name context forever, level 1
event (10028) add with value "10028 trace name context forever, level 1" 10028 trace name context forever, level 1
event (10629) add with value "10629 trace name context forever, level 32" 10629 trace name context forever, level 32
event (14532) add with value "14532 trace name context forever, level 1" 14532 trace name context forever, level 1
event (10142) add with value "10142 trace name context forever, level 1" 10142 trace name context forever, level 1
event (38068) add with value "38068 trace name context forever, level 100" 38068 trace name context forever, level 100
event (38085) add with value "38085 trace name context forever, level 1" 38085 trace name context forever, level 1
event (44951) add with value "44951 trace name context forever, level 1024" 44951 trace name context forever, level 1024
event (10411) check if default value " " is suitable (set with level 1 if Winbundle>=3) set with level 1 if Winbundle>=3
event (10191) ok (is set correctly =) 10191 trace name context forever, level 1
event (10049) ok (is not set; mentioned with other prerequisites/not mentioned in note)
event (10091) ok (is not set; mentioned with other prerequisites/not mentioned in note)
event (10162) ok (is not set; mentioned with other prerequisites/not mentioned in note)
event (10753) ok (is not set; mentioned with other prerequisites/not mentioned in note)
event (10891) ok (is not set; mentioned with other prerequisites/not mentioned in note)
how and where(initSID.ora) i can set the value of above event and _fix parameters?
Regards, -
Physical Memory Upgrade [SAP, Oracle parameter changes]
Hello Guru,
Good day!
I'm not sure if I'm in the correct forum, please bare with me if I'm not.
We are actually planning to increase our Production [Physical Memory] server from its current size 15360GB including [oracle, SAP & OS] to 44GB memory. Do you have any idea how can we calculate to the most needed SAP / DB parameter should be increase after we allocate the 44GB in preparation for Go-Live. Below are details of my systems [oracle version, kernel, R/3 System, OS version, SAP parameter and DB parameter.
Reason for memory upgrade: will create two client in one system with a different number of users and different plant e.g. America / Canada
======================================================================
SAP R/3 Version: SAP 4.6C
Oracle Version: 10.2.0.4.0
OS Level: AIX 5.3
orapaa> oslevel -g
Fileset Actual Level Maintenance Level
bos.rte 5.3.8.0 5.3.0.0
Physical Memory
Real,MB 15360
======================================================================
kernel release 46D
kernel make variant 46D_EXT
compiled on AIX 1 5 0056AA8A4C00
compiled for 64 BIT
compile time Aug 17 2007 10:57:49
update level 0
patch number 2337
source id 0.2337
======================================================================
orapaa> prtconf
System Model: IBM,9117-MMA
Machine Serial Number: 06DDD01
Processor Type: PowerPC_POWER6
Processor Implementation Mode: POWER 6
Processor Version: PV_6_Compat
Number Of Processors: 4
Processor Clock Speed: 4208 MHz
CPU Type: 64-bit
Kernel Type: 64-bit
LPAR Info: 9 SWT_AMR_SADCB335_SAP_HA_PRI
Memory Size: 15360 MB
Good Memory Size: 15360 MB
Platform Firmware level: Not Available
Firmware Version: IBM,EM340_095
Console Login: enable
Auto Restart: true
Full Core: false
======================================================================
Our current used SAP parameter
Profile parameters for SAP buffers Parameters Name Value Unit
Program buffer
abap/buffersize 850000 Kb
CUA buffer
rsdb/cua/buffersize 10000
Screen buffer
zcsa/presentation_buffer_area 20000000 Byte
Generic key table buffer
zcsa/table_buffer_area 100000000 Byte
Single record table buffer
rtbb/buffer_length 60000
Export/import buffer
rsdb/obj/buffersize 40000 kB
Table definition buffer
rsdb/ntab/entrycount 30000
Field description buffer
rsdb/ntab/ftabsize 60000 kB
Initial record buffer
rsdb/ntab/irbdsize 8000 kB
Short nametab (NTAB)
rsdb/ntab/sntabsize 3000 kB
Calendar buffer
zcsa/calendar_area 500000 Byte
Roll, extended and heap memory EM/TOTAL_SIZE_MB 6144 MB
ztta/roll_area 6500000 Byte
ztta/roll_first 1 Byte
ztta/short_area 1400000 Byte
rdisp/ROLL_SHM 16384 8 kB
rdisp/PG_SHM 16384 8 kB
rdisp/PG_LOCAL 150 8 kB
em/initial_size_MB 4092 MB
em/blocksize_KB 4096 kB
em/address_space_MB 4092 MB
ztta/roll_extension 2000000000 Byte
abap/heap_area_dia 2000000000 Byte
abap/heap_area_nondia 2000000000 Byte
abap/heap_area_total 2000000000 Byte
abap/heaplimit 40000000 Byte
abap/use_paging 0
======================================================================
Oracle Parameter
Oracle Parameter Name Value Unit
SGA_MAX_SIZE 6192 MB
PGA_AGGREGATE_TARGET 400 MB
DB_CACHE_SIZE 0
SHARED_POOL_SIZE 960 MB
LARGE_POOL_SIZE 16 MB
JAVA_POOL_SIZE 32 MB
LOG_BUFFER 14246912
db_block_buffers 655360
Thanks and regards,
MikeI feel the best way to get the parameters which needs to be adjusted is to go for EarlyWatch Check after increasing the Physical Memory of your SAP system, as we cannot say how and which parameters needs to be checked and changed.. as there is some dependiblity also between the parameters...
All the best ! -
Problem configuring SSO: "Oracle SSO Warning - Unable to process request"
I'm having difficulty getting a sample application to work with SSO, and I was hoping someone could point me in to the right direction.
We've got 2 separate systems, call them ASserver and SSOserver. ASserver is running Oracle 9i AS, SSOserver is the infrastructure server (e.g. OID and SSO).
The application runs just fine on ASserver without SSO.
I made the change to mod_osso.conf so that the URL for the application is now protected, and added a partner application entry to the application (more on that in a moment).
When I go to the URL for the partner application, the browser is properly redirected to the SSO server and I am prompted to log in. After logging in, I get an error page with the error "Oracle SSO Warning - Unable to process request" (the URL is something like http://<ASserver>/osso_login_success?urlc=... etc).
Several questions:
- can my servlet just be a plain servlet, or does it need to do the various things described in the "SSO Application Developer's Guide"?
- when configuring the partner application on the SSO server, are success url and logout url supposed to be the osso_login_success and osso_logout_success URLs? Should they be on the ASserver or the SSOserver?
Any other recommendations?
Thanks,
dwhOkay, solved. I am pretty sure I was suffering from the condition described in metalink Note:227221.1, "Oracle SSO Warning Logging On to Midtier Using Mozilla Based Browser" (http://metalink.oracle.com/metalink/plsql/ml2_documents.showNOT?p_id=227221.1)
although it was happening in IE as well.
Essentially, I modified the entry for the partner application to change the port numbers from 7778 to 7777, and now it works.
I think I also had several entries for the app server in the SSO server, and I don't know which one it was using. I got rid of all of them except the one named <oraclehome>.<restofdomain>, e.g. oas.foobar.com, where "oas" is the name of my app server's Oracle home. -
Oracle SSO Warning Helper!!!
When I tried to configure and deploy the JAZN demo callerInfo of Oracle9iAS R2. I was able to get the SSO login page, but after I type my user info, i.e., "ray/welcome", I got the following message
"Oracle SSO Warning - Unable to process request
Either the requested URL was not specified in terms of a fully-qualified host name or OHS single sign-on is incorrectly configured.
Please notify your administrator."
The domain controller of the Windows NetWork is still under NT4, to use the SSO, is it required the domain controller to run Win2k? How can I work around the fully-qualified host name problem?
Thanks a lot.Please us ethe below workaround
For Providergroup, webproviders:
To create providers etc., you have to give privileges to users in the following XML file:
<OH>/j2ee/OC4J_Portal/applications/portalTools/providerBuilder/WEB-INF/deployment_providerui/provideruiacls.xml
To give privilege do the following:
<providerui xmlns="http://www.oracle.com/portal/providerui/1.0">
<objectType name="ALL_OBJECTS">
<object name="ANY_PROVIDER" owner="providerui">
<user name="orcladmin" privilege="500"/>
<user name="portal" privilege="500"/>
<user name="any_provider_manage_user" privilege="500"/>
<user name="any_provider_edit_user" privilege="400"/>
<user name="any_provider_execute_user" privilege="300"/>
<user name="any_provider_create_user" privilege="100"/>
</object>
<object name="ANY_PORTLET" owner="providerui">
<user name="orcladmin" privilege="500"/>
<user name="portal" privilege="500"/>
<user name="any_portlet_manage_user" privilege="500"/>
<user name="any_portlet_edit_user" privilege="400"/>
<user name="any_portlet_execute_user" privilege="300"/>
</object>
</objectType> -
Is it possible to pass a null Input Oracle parameter to a stored procedure
I have a stored procedure that take 3 inputs and gives 1 output.I'm using Oracle parameter to add all 3 input parameters as follows :
OracleParameter inobj = cmd.Parameters.Add("wid", OracleDbType.Int32,50);
inobj.Direction = ParameterDirection.Input;
inobj.Value = _employeeID;
and added the output parameter as follows:
OracleParameter outobj = _cmd.Parameters.Add("w_first", OracleDbType.Varchar2, 50);
outobj.Direction = ParameterDirection.Output;
On the UI end , the user has a choice to provide 1 input or all inputs or any 2 inputs based on his interest. Stored Proc looks as follows:
SP( inp1 in parameter, inp2 in parameter, inp3 in parameter, output1 out parameter)
If i just get 1 input or 2 inputs from the user, is it fine to query the data for output using same stored procedure or should i have individual stored procedures for each scenario(combination of different inputs)?
Will i get any pl/sql error that says invalid number of arguements?This means if i have 1 input , i need to have a different method to pass 1 parameter value and other input parameters as null and if there are 2 inputs will need different method to handle. So 5 different methods all together?
What if the stored procedure is as follows ,will its make things easier so that only one method is used for all scenarios?(optional parameters is set default value as null in the stored proc)
Create or Replace
Procedure GetFoo
(cur_z OUT sys_refcursor,
pub_date IN varchar2,
fname IN varchar2 default null,
lname IN varchar2 default null,
phone IN varchar2 default null
IS
BEGIN
---get some data
END;
*actually i can test this but, all the database servers are down today. So, i need to have idea if this thing works before i confirm with someone. Thanks. -
Hi,
We are using for all Oracle number columns the Oracle parameter type OracleType.Number.
Now we have seen that we can also use the type OracleTyp.Int32.
Is it better or faster to use this type for columns
which can use this type.
Have anybody experience with using Oracle data types ??
Kind Regards
MartinIt really depends on what kind of data you're inserting or updating. If you've data that can be accomodated in an integer, you should use OracleDbType.Int32 over OracleDbType.Decimal. You get much better performance by using Byte, Int16, Int32, Single, Double over Decimal but these types can not hold the same precision and scale as Decimal type can.
-
SAP Bundle Patches and Automatic Oracle parameter check script (note117165)
After reading SAP note 1027012 on SAP Bundle Patches and SAP note 1171650 on the
automatic Oracle parameter check script I have a simple question:
Is it still necessary to manually check whether some patch is installed in order to determine
exactly which event and fixcontrol to set?
Or is the automatic Oracle parameter check script so sophisticated that it is fully
sufficient to implement its recommendations, and you don't neet to manually
check any more which SBP with which bugfixes has been installed?
It would be great if SAP could confirm that the automatic parameter check is sufficient,
but so far I haven't seen this statement explicitly. I believe this is mostly because it
is so difficult (impossible?) to determine via SQL which patches have been applied.
Regards,
Mark>
> Is it still necessary to manually check whether some patch is installed in order to determine
> exactly which event and fixcontrol to set?
Yes and No.
until now, fixcontrol are dependent of CBO patches and those are "register" on the view v$system_fix_control. They can be "check" autmatically, so you get the "proper" recommendation for those.
the parameter event depends on different situations, like some patches. But those patches are "normal" patches and it is not possible to check if they are installed from inside the DB with a simple script. For those, the check script will tell you to do it manually and will tell you which patch has to be check
In addition, there are other parameters that have to be check "manually", like processes (where you get a "semiautomatic" check) or db_cache_size, where you should check if the size
> It would be great if SAP could confirm that the automatic parameter check is sufficient,
> but so far I haven't seen this statement explicitly. I believe this is mostly because it
> is so difficult (impossible?) to determine via SQL which patches have been applied.
The automatic parameter check is sufficient, meaning that you get all information, including the parameters that you have to check manually and some information for that check. Currently, it is not possible to automatize it 100% -
Oracle SSO Warning when creating a Web Provider
Hi,
I am getting the following error message when I try to create a new Web Provider in portal:
Oracle SSO Warning - Unable to process request
Either the requested URL was not specified in terms of a fully-qualified host name or OHS single sign-on is incorrectly configured. Please notify your administrator.
I can only see this message in a Mozilla web browser, IE hangs. I have updated the provideruiacls.xml file to include an entry for my portal user with privilege="500".
Can anyone help?
Thanks in advance.Please us ethe below workaround
For Providergroup, webproviders:
To create providers etc., you have to give privileges to users in the following XML file:
<OH>/j2ee/OC4J_Portal/applications/portalTools/providerBuilder/WEB-INF/deployment_providerui/provideruiacls.xml
To give privilege do the following:
<providerui xmlns="http://www.oracle.com/portal/providerui/1.0">
<objectType name="ALL_OBJECTS">
<object name="ANY_PROVIDER" owner="providerui">
<user name="orcladmin" privilege="500"/>
<user name="portal" privilege="500"/>
<user name="any_provider_manage_user" privilege="500"/>
<user name="any_provider_edit_user" privilege="400"/>
<user name="any_provider_execute_user" privilege="300"/>
<user name="any_provider_create_user" privilege="100"/>
</object>
<object name="ANY_PORTLET" owner="providerui">
<user name="orcladmin" privilege="500"/>
<user name="portal" privilege="500"/>
<user name="any_portlet_manage_user" privilege="500"/>
<user name="any_portlet_edit_user" privilege="400"/>
<user name="any_portlet_execute_user" privilege="300"/>
</object>
</objectType> -
Oracle 10g on solaris 10 : kernel parameter warning
I am installing oracle 10g on Solaris 10.
I have a warning on kernel parameter missing (shminfo_shmmax for example) during the system check.
I understood that with the 10 version of solaris these parameters are replaced by ressources control and I have checked them. They are correctly setted.
Need I do something before continue the install to release the warning or can I bypass this issue and continue the install as I have no warning ?
Thanks for your answers.
Sorry for my english.You are right. Since Solaris 10 kernel parameters settings in /etc/system is obsolete and some parameters are deprecated.
The steps how to configure required parameters you can find in my paper (step #1.): http://ivan.kartik.sk/oracle/install_ora10gR2_solaris.html
I bypass this issue and continue the install as I have no warning You can safely bypass this issue during installation process but you should set these parameters after installation. -
Oracle Parameter (SGA_MAX_SIZE / SGA_TARGET)
Hello together,
since yesterday we have a new oracle database on X64 (64BIT on Windows) with SAP R/3 4.7.
The server have 24GB ram and 2x quad Core CPU.
How can give me a good value for this parameters (for oracle)
SGA_MAX_SIZE
SGA_TARGET
I don't know what is a good size for such a hugh physikal memory!
Thank you
ChristianHello Christian,
the parameter SGA_TARGET is "not longer" supported by SAP.
Take a look at sapnote #828268
At the beginning of oracle 10g we have activated the ASMM ... but there is still a bug with oracle 10g which results in a hang situation (solved in 11g ... no backport planned)
For more information regarding to the bug... take a look at bugnotes on metalink 4466399/4472338
SGA_MAX_SIZE should be a little bit higher than the sum of all your memory pools (SGA), because of you can extend some areas dynamically on the fly (if you are using a spfile).
Regards
Stefan -
Oracle Parameter _FIX_CONTROL: EWA vs SAP Note Recommendation?
We have Oracle 11.2.0.2 on RedHat Linux
cat /$ORACLE_HOME/sapbundle/version.txt
SAP Bundle Patch 11.2.0.2.3 - 201108
For FIXCONTROL '6055658:OFF' what recommendation should I take the SAP Note or EWA?
1) SAP NOTE
In the SAP Note 1431798 "Oracle 11_2_0 Database Parameter Settings" ...
May 12, 2011:
added FIXCONTROL '6055658:OFF' for UNIX
FIXCONTROL
'6055658:OFF' UNIX SBP 11201x_date ( date >= 201105 )
So the SAP Note looks like FIXCONTROL should contain '6055658:OFF'
2) EWA
Settings defined but not recommended
6055658:OFF
Thanks in advance.Hello Bill,
You should always check and go with the recommendation from the parameter note.
10g - 830576
11g -1431798
For the fixcontrol parameters, these were introduced to allow enabling and disabling of optimizer fixes . The corresponding patch therefore needs to be installed to enable you to you set the required parameter. With EWA, this report usually flags any parameter which may require further checking, (ie because a note exists that details behaviour of setting this parameter for example a performance behaviour in OLTP versus OLAP). EWA is doing this to ensure that the DBA is aware that there is some additional step, info regarding the parameter. The Colleagues above have already mentioned to run the parameter script which checks it's result against the Oracle version parameter note and flags any incorrect setting and also provides the setting that is recommended. Before you do this you should check the relevant parameter note for these recommendations.
Hope this helps
Best Regards
Rachel
Edited by: Rachel Holloway on Mar 4, 2012 2:18 PM -
Required mentioned details to configure Oracle parameter Alert
Dear all,
We plan to configue alert to monitor our SAP server.
Oracle Parameters:
Performance:
1, Data Buffer Cache hit ratio
2, Library cache hit ratio
3, Dictionary cache
4, "Deadlocks
Which lock(s) are these?"
5, What are the current top 10 SQL queries in terms of resource utilization?
Capacity :
1, Are there objects that have reached their maximum extent? Which ones are these?
2, Are any of the tablespaces reaching their storage capacity?
3, Is there any invalid object in the database?
Kindly suggest where can get all the above details .
Regards
SathiesHi,
Below SAP help documents will give you more informatino,
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/df/455ea7747111d6b25100508b6b8a93/frameset.htm
Note 483856 - Description of the alerts for Oracle database monitoring
Note 1139623 - Using transaction RZ20 to monitor remote Oracle databases
Note 1431798 - Oracle 11.2.0: Database Parameter Settings
Note 1289199 - Information about Oracle parameters
Regards
Nagaraju -
Hi...
I have Oracle 8i installed on a Linux server.
Now I installed 9i in another server and upgraded an Oracle 8i database.
But there are some queries that I have performance problems. For example, when I run in SQL Navigator a simple select that returns 2000 rows, the first 100 rows comes fast, a long time later the next 100 are returned, then the next 100 takes a long time too, and so on. It´s like Oracle could not allocate space for the result set.
The value of SORT_AREA_SIZE parameter and the size of TEMP tablespace are the same on both servers.
Any ideas?
Thanks a lotWhat version of 9.2? You should be on at least 9.2.0.6 but really should probably have upgraded to 9.2.0.8.
Between 8.1.7 and 9.2.0 more than 16 hidden parameters which affect the optimizer changed. There were bugs associated with several of these parameters. Upgrading to .6, .7, and .8 provide the fixes for most of the bugs I have read about.
Make sure you updated the statistics after the upgrade. Some SQL statements will just need to be tunned.
Carefully compare the database parameters sets as the use of 9.2 automatic space management (SGA management) and use of the pga_aggregate_target prameter change the environment and query performance can change as a result.
Basic tuning will work to take care of most of the problems in short order.
HTH -- Mark D Powell -- -
Oracle parameter distributed_lock_timeout
I am getting an application error : ORA-02049: timeout: distributed transaction waiting for lock
error? How do I keep the ORA-02049 from happening?how to modify this parameter?As per oracle, this parameter is NOT supposed to be changed. This can adversly effect the database performance. See the metalink note,*30718.1* for the description of this parameter. And see the note *19332.1* for the example of it.
This parameter is a static parameter so it would require you to have a bounce of your db.
HTH
Aman....
Maybe you are looking for
-
HP LaserJet M1120 MFP will not print on wireless network with Windows 8.1 operating system
The printer worked on the wireless network with Windows 8. I have been advised that it does not work with windows 8.1 because a driver is required. However this is not available to download. It is ridiculous that by having the latest operating system
-
Accounting Entry IN Free Goods Scenario
Hi Gurus, Could you please tell me , what is the accounting entry in Free Goods scenario ? Advance Thanks to All . Regards, Aditya Kumar Patra
-
Need help connecting my nokia 6708 to pc
Pls help as i don able to connect my 6708 mobile to pc as no driver or pc suit i hv for the same pls help jayesh
-
Database data to nested xml structure
Hi All, I need to convert the data in the oracle database to nested xml tree structure as below: Data in the database is in the following structure: 1 branch1 13-JAN-11 a.txt 1 branch1 25-JAN-11 b.txt 1 branch1 25-JAN-
-
Can anyone tell me which is cpu0 and cpu1 on a G5 2.5
Can anyone tell me which is CPU0 and CPU1 on a G5 2.5