Oracle partition

hello all,
We have a table partitioned by range , we have added paritions for next 5yrs but when i added the partitions i got an oracle error ora-1658 which was resolved by adding more datafiles
my q/s is if i have added paritions for future years (eg 2010, 2011) why would the space in the datafile show as full although i belive there would not be enough data in the future dates
can i consolidate the paritions so that in case there are any fragmentation the datafiles can be reordered and free space can be made available in these datafile
kedar

A partition consumes at least the space of the initial extent of that partition.
SELECT table_name, partition_name, initial_extent FROM USER_TAB_PARTITIONS
WHERE table_name = 'RANGE_SALES';
Drop and recreate the partitions with a smaller initial extent. For example
ALTER TABLE range_sales
ADD PARTITION SALES_Q1_2010 VALUES LESS THAN (TO_DATE('01-APR-2010','DD-MON-YYYY'))
STORAGE ( INITIAL 8K);
Edited by: [email protected] on Oct 13, 2008 12:21 PM

Similar Messages

How to use Oracle partitioning with JPA @OneToOne reference?

Hi!
A little bit late in the project we have realized that we need to use Oracle partitioning both for performance and admin of the data. (Partitioning by range (month) and after a year we will move the oldest month of data to an archive db)
We have an object model with an main/root entity "Trans" with @OneToMany and @OneToOne relationships.
How do we use Oracle partitioning on the @OneToOne relationships?
(We'd rather not change the model as we already have millions of rows in the db.)
On the main entity "Trans" we use: partition by range (month) on a date column.
And on all @OneToMany we use: partition by reference (as they have a primary-foreign key relationship).
But for the @OneToOne key for the referenced object, the key is placed in the main/source object as the example below:
@Entity
public class Employee {
@Id
@Column(name="EMP_ID")
private long id;
@OneToOne(fetch=FetchType.LAZY)
@JoinColumn(name="ADDRESS_ID")
private Address address;
EMPLOYEE (table)
EMP_ID FIRSTNAME LASTNAME SALARY ADDRESS_ID
1 Bob Way 50000 6
2 Sarah Smith 60000 7
ADDRESS (table)
ADDRESS_ID STREET CITY PROVINCE COUNTRY P_CODE
6 17 Bank St Ottawa ON Canada K2H7Z5
7 22 Main St Toronto ON Canada L5H2D5
From the Oracle documentation: "Reference partitioning allows the partitioning of two tables related to one another by referential constraints. The partitioning key is resolved through an existing parent-child relationship, enforced by enabled and active primary key and foreign key constraints."
How can we use "partition by reference" on @OneToOne relationsships or are there other solutions?
Thanks for any advice.
/Mats

Crospost! How to use Oracle partitioning with JPA @OneToOne reference?

How to add Oracle Partition Component after the RDBMS Installation

Hi,
I have been installed Oracle 11g R2 in Suse Linux 10 (64 bit), while in installation i deselect the Partition option. Now i need to bring the Oracle Partition option to my Oracle RDBMS.
Please help me how to bring the Partition Option once again into my Oracle Server.
Thanks in Advance,
Baalaji V

Same senario i have here, But i want to know how to install the Partition option after the RDBMS installation.
Since i have been installed the Oracle 11g R2 Ent Edition without Partition option, Now i need to install the same.
Thanks.

Create OEM report - Databases using Oracle Partitioning option

Hi
Is it possible to draw a report on Oracle Enterprise Manager 10g to discover which of its list of target databases are using the oracle partitioning option. It is for license purposes. Oracle partitioning is installed by default, but it is not always used.
Thanks and Regards

Yes that is possible if you create a report using a query like
SELECT
HOST, DATABASE_NAME, INSTANCE_NAME,
TARGET_TYPE,NAME,
CURRENTLY_USED, DETECTED_USAGES, FIRST_USAGE_DATE,
LAST_USAGE_DATE, VERSION, LAST_SAMPLE_DATE,
DESCRIPTION
FROM SYSMAN.MGMT$DB_FEATUREUSAGE
WHERE
NAME = 'Partitioning (user)'
AND
CURRENTLY_USED = 'TRUE'
Eric

Is Oracle Partitioning relevant when using BI Accelarator?

This is a naive question, if my query is running in BI Accelerator, I presume it bypasses RDBMS all together, so Oracle partitioning will be of no benefit. I think the answer is YES, but just checking since I am new to BIA.

> This is a naive question, if my query is running in BI Accelerator, I presume it bypasses RDBMS all together, so Oracle partitioning will be of no benefit. I think the answer is YES, but just checking since I am new to BIA.
IF your query completely runs in BIA and no DB access is made, then having partitioned objects in the Oracle database does not make a difference, right.
BUT this likely won't be the case very often. So you will have to access the database for BI.
Also keep in mind, what partitions are actually there for: making it easier to handle large volumes of data.
Accessing it, moving it, getting rid of it - partitions are there to break down the problem of managing data into smaller pieces.
You need to have that when you're dealing with lots of data.
And lots of data is what you're dealing with when you use SAP BI and BIA.
Therefore: Oracle partitioning does provide a benefit to the system, even if you do have a BIA.
regards,
Lars

How to use oracle partition in ODI

hi all,
i have a oracle database with daily partition. partition syntex is tbl_abc partition(20090909), now i want to use it in interface..
kindly tell the way...
Regard
Naseer

Hi Naseer,
How are you?
ODI doesnt support partition. You can do a work around for that by creating a VIEW out of that partition name, reverse it in ODI and use that as a source.
Like,
CREATE TABLE sales_range
(salesman_id NUMBER(5),
salesman_name VARCHAR2(30),
sales_amount NUMBER(10),
sales_date DATE)
PARTITION BY RANGE(sales_date)
PARTITION sales_jan2000 VALUES LESS THAN(TO_DATE('02/01/2000','DD/MM/YYYY')),
PARTITION sales_feb2000 VALUES LESS THAN(TO_DATE('03/01/2000','DD/MM/YYYY')),
PARTITION sales_mar2000 VALUES LESS THAN(TO_DATE('04/01/2000','DD/MM/YYYY')),
PARTITION sales_apr2000 VALUES LESS THAN(TO_DATE('05/01/2000','DD/MM/YYYY'))
create view sales_jan200 as select * from sales_range PARTITION (sales_jan2000);
Makes sense?
Thanks,
G

Oracle Partitioning is an option or not..

In Oracle 10g, partitioning is an option to be bought separately or it is the part of the core product.
Thx

It is an Enterprise Edition option. This website is for 11g, but also valid for earlier versions.
http://www.oracle.com/database/product_editions.html
Werner

Oracle Partition maintenance range information required

Hi
I would like to know the range between oldest partition and the newest partition on a table. can some body help me with this?
I have a query that gives me all the partition tables in the database ,now I would like to get the date of oldest partition and the newest partition to get the rentention period..any help would be appreciated..
here is what I have get all the partition tables
SELECT table_owner, table_name,max(partition_name)
FROM dba_tab_partitions p
WHERE p.table_name IN
(select distinct c.TABLE_NAME
from dba_part_key_columns p, dba_tab_cols c
where p.name = c.TABLE_NAME
and p.column_name = c.COLUMN_NAME
and p.object_type = 'TABLE'
and c.DATA_TYPE = 'DATE'
and p.owner NOT IN ('SYS', 'SYSTEM'))
and p.table_name not like 'BIN%'
group by table_owner, table_name
order by table_owner;

What is your 4 digit Oracle version?
Provide an example of a table and what you consider to be the 'oldest' and 'newest' partitions. Are you talking about tables that are RANGE partitioned? INTERVAL partitioned? What about subpartitions?
Why does your query use MAX(partition_name)? How is that information useful - partitions might have any names including system generated ones.
And why would the oldest and newest give you retention period?
For simple RANGE partitioned tables the range info is in the HIGH_VALUE column (a LONG - so need to use PL/SQL) of DBA_TAB_PARTITIONS.
Suggest you first work out a step-by-step manual process for doing what you want to do and then work on automating it.
Post an example of your manual process.

Oracle Partitioning

Hi Team,
We have Oracle Database 11.1.0.7 on Unix.
How Can validate If the Oracle Partitionig was implemented?
Regards,
Guido

938302 wrote:
Hi Team,
We have Oracle Database 11.1.0.7 on Unix.
How Can validate If the Oracle Partitionig was implemented?
Regards,
Guido
938302 wrote:
Hi Team,
We have Oracle Database 11.1.0.7 on Unix.
How Can validate If the Oracle Partitionig was implemented?
Regards,
Guido
it is not clear what you mean by implemented.
only Enterprise Edition contains/supports partitioning
SQL> select * from v$version;
BANNER
Oracle Database 11g Enterprise Edition Release 11.2.0.2.0 - Production
PL/SQL Release 11.2.0.2.0 - Production
CORE 11.2.0.2.0 Production
TNS for Linux: Version 11.2.0.2.0 - Production
NLSRTL Version 11.2.0.2.0 - Production

Installing Linux and Oracle-Partition Management

Dear Friends,
I will be using Java Linux and Oracle lite on My New IBM R40
Thinkpad, that Now Has Windows XP.
Problem at Present is Finding Free Partition Manager
for DualBoot Partitioning.

I had a similar problem. I solved it by adding the following line in /etc/hosts
127.0.0.1 localhost.localdomain localhost
After that I started the installation again and the problem was solved. But, now I'm having a problem with opmn and HTTP Server. The error says:
"...Error
--> Process (pid=14674)
failed to start a managed process after the maximum retry limit
Log:
/u01/app/oracle/product/9.0.4/IMHome/opmn/logs/HTTP_Server~1 ..."
I'm using Red Hat ES 4. Please let me know if you can complete the installation.
Thanks,
Pablo.

Is Oracle Partitioning req'd in the Source R/3 system for SBIW Setup Table?

We have ECC6.0 as our Source System. My BI team is trying to load 3 years of SALES history into the BI7.0 system, and then the APO system will pull 1 of those 3 years into it. To begin this process, they are using SBIW to Manage the Extract Structures and create the Setup Tables.
I got an alert that these Setup Tables were created with Partitions. We are not licensed for partitioning in our ECC(R/3) system, only in BI and APO.
1.) Is Partitioning really necessary for these Setup Tables?
2.) It appears that the Setup jobs create these tables by default as partitioned? How do I disable or change that?
Thanks,
Richard (Basis)

Hi Neeraj,
thank you for the reply.
Yes, i have checked tRFCs and logs , everything looks ok, we are getting expected records in BW but job is not ending in the backend system and BW load is always showing YELLOW.
looks like our developer using custom FM to extract data and i feel that something code issue which is going endless loop. they need to write code to terminate process after last record in the extract process. i will update you once i get root cause of the issue.
thanks again..
thanks
Venkata

Oracle partitioning - change in existing tables

I recently started working with legacy code and noticed that some huge tables (5 years worth of data, don't have more details on me right now but can post later if needed) are partitioned based on time sequence number column while majority of queries are done based on time (different column). Queries performance is degrading over time and I'd like to try to modify partitioning and run some tests to see if there is a performance improvement.
My only concern is this is a lot of data and they are all live, so I have to come up with some sort of solution on how to switch partitioning with the least impact on applications running 24 x 7.
Can someone suggest a viable solution? Something you have done in the same situation and it worked?
If there is a certain technique on how to do it, please give me search keywords and I will google the rest.
Thanks,
S.

You can't change the partitioning of an existing table.
You can, however, use the DBMS_REDEFINITION package to do an online redefinition. Behind the scenes, what you're really doing is
- Creating a new table with the new partitioning scheme
- Copying the data from the old table to the new table
- Dropping the old table
- Renaming the new table to the name used by the old table
Now, if the large table is only being queried, not updated (or at least you have a window where it is read-only), it's probably easier to just do these steps manually rather than using DBMS_REDEFINITION where you at least have finer grained control over the steps. You'll still need a moment where the table is inaccessible to do the actual rename.
Justin

Partitioning on Oracle 8.0.6 (rule base vs. cost base)

At my current engagement, we are using Oracle Financials 11.0.3 on Oracle 8.0.5 which uses rule-based optimizer. However, it is been planned to upgrade the database from Oracle 8.0.5 to Oracle 8.0.6 as well as implement Oracle partitioning. With this in mind, we are concerned about possible performance issues that the implementation of partitioning may cause since RBO does not recognize it.
We agree that the RBO will see a non-partitioned table the same as a partitioned. In this scenario where you gain the most is with backup/recoverability and general maintenance of the partitioned table.
Nevertheless, we have a few questions:
When implementing partitions, will the optimizer choose to go with Cost base vs. Rule base for these partitioned tables?
Is it possible that the optimizer might get confused with this?
If this change form RBO to CBO does occur, the application could potential perform poorly because of the way it has been written.
Please provide any feedback.
thanks in advance.

If the CBO is invoked when accessing these tables, you may run into problems.
- You'll have to analyze your tables & ensure that the statistics are kept up to date.
- It's possible that any SQL statements which invoke the CBO rather than the RBO will have different performance characteristics. The SYSTEM data dictionary tables, for example, must use the RBO or their performance suffers dramatically. Most of the time, the CBO beats the RBO, but applications which have been heavily tuned with the RBO may have problems with the CBO.
- Check your init.ora to see what optimizer mode you're in. If you're set to CHOOSE, the CBO will be invoked whenever statistics are available on the table(s) involved. If you choose RULE, you'll only invoke the CBO when the RBO encounters situations it doesn't have rules for.
Justin

Partitioning on Oracle 8i (Rule Based vs. Cost Based)

At my current engagement, we are using Oracle Financials 11.0.3 on Oracle 8.0.6. The application uses rule-based optimizer. The client wants to implement Oracle partitioning. With this in mind, we are concerned about possible performance issues that the implementation of partitioning may cause since RBO does not recognize it.
We agree that the RBO will see a non-partitioned table the same as a partitioned. In this scenario where you gain the most is with backup/recoverability and general maintenance of the partitioned table.
Nevertheless, we have a few questions:
When implementing partitions, will the optimizer choose to go with Cost base vs. Rule base for these partitioned tables?
Is it possible that the optimizer might get confused with this?
Could it degrade performance at the SQL level?
If this change from RBO to CBO does occur, the application could potential perform poorly because of the way it has been written.
Please provide any feedback.
Thanks in advance.

If the CBO is invoked when accessing these tables, you may run into problems.
- You'll have to analyze your tables & ensure that the statistics are kept up to date.
- It's possible that any SQL statements which invoke the CBO rather than the RBO will have different performance characteristics. The SYSTEM data dictionary tables, for example, must use the RBO or their performance suffers dramatically. Most of the time, the CBO beats the RBO, but applications which have been heavily tuned with the RBO may have problems with the CBO.
- Check your init.ora to see what optimizer mode you're in. If you're set to CHOOSE, the CBO will be invoked whenever statistics are available on the table(s) involved. If you choose RULE, you'll only invoke the CBO when the RBO encounters situations it doesn't have rules for.
Justin

Partitioning not active BW oracle 9i

Hi,
I'm installing BW 3.5 based on windowsNT/oracle9i. I've found solutions to the problems so far, but now it seems that partitioning is not active and I don't know what to do. Still, the option has been installed with the database but the parameter is not set in the table V$version.
The problem appeared when I tryied to create a transfer structure in BW.
How can I activate partitioning in oracle 9.2 ?
Thanks in advance for your help !
Laurent ALLAIS

The Oracle partitioning feature is automatically enabled during installation of the BW system. If you have completed a normal installation, and the partitioning feature is not active, this points to something missed in the installation. Perhaps you have obtained your Oracle installations (and licensing) directly from Oracle, and not through SAP. If this is the case, you should contact Oracle about the partitioning feature. If you completed a normal installation, and for some reason the partitioning feature is not active, please open an SAP customer message on this topic.
Regards -
Ron Silberstein, SAP

Oracle partition

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for