Oracle view return more rows than its base query

O/S : AIX
Database : 11g R (11.1.0.6.0)
Query in questioon :
select A.CompanyCode, A.Code ElementCode, A.ItemTypeCode ElementItemTypeCode, A.SubcodeKey ElementSubcodeKey,
D.DecoSubcode01 SubCode01, D.DecoSubcode02 SubCode02, D.DecoSubcode03 SubCode03, D.DecoSubcode04 SubCode04,
D.DecoSubcode05 SubCode05, D.DecoSubcode06 SubCode06, D.DecoSubcode07 SubCode07, D.DecoSubcode08 SubCode08,
D.DecoSubcode09 SubCode09, D.DecoSubcode10 SubCode10, C.ItemTypeBCode, C.SubCode01B, C.SubCode02B, C.SubCode03B,
C.SubCode04B, C.SubCode05B, C.SubCode06B, C.SubCode07B, C.SubCode08B, C.SubCode09B, C.SubCode10B,
B1.ValueString SlipNo, B2.ValueString EmployeeCode, B3.ValueString SetNo, B4.ValueString SalesOrderCounterCode,
B5.ValueString SalesOrderCode, B6.ValueString Remarks, B7.ValueDecimal SumTareWeight, B8.ValueString PackingUMCode,
B9.ValueString PrimaryUMCode, B10.ValueString PlantCode, B11.ValueDecimal PackingFormCode, D.LogicalWarehouseCode FromWarehouseCode,
D.TemplateCode FromTemplateCode, D.PhysicalWarehouseCode FromPhysicalWarehouseCode, D.WHSLOCATIONWAREHOUSEZONECODE FromZoneCode,
D.WarehouseLocationCode FromLocationCode, E.LogicalWarehouseCode ToWarehouseCode, E.TemplateCode ToTemplateCode, E.PhysicalWarehouseCode ToPhysicalWarehouseCode,
E.WHSLOCATIONWAREHOUSEZONECODE ToZoneCode, E.WarehouseLocationCode ToLocationCode, D.TransactionDate, D.ItemTypeCode, E.WeightGross SumGrossWeight, E.WeightNet SumNetWeight
FROM Elements A, ADStorage B1, ADStorage B2, ADStorage B3, ADStorage B4, ADStorage B5, ADStorage B6, ADStorage B7,
ADStorage B8, ADStorage B9, ADStorage B10, ADStorage B11, GoodCutAndFentDetail C, StockTransaction D, StockTransaction E
where A.ABSUNIQUEID=B1.UNIQUEID and B1.NameEntityName='Elements' and B1.FieldName ='GoodCutAndFentSlipNo'
and A.ABSUNIQUEID=B2.UNIQUEID and B2.NameEntityName='Elements' and B2.FieldName ='GoodCutAndFentEmployee'
and A.ABSUNIQUEID=B3.UNIQUEID and B3.NameEntityName='Elements' and B3.FieldName ='GoodCutAndFentSetNo'
and A.ABSUNIQUEID=B4.UNIQUEID and B4.NameEntityName='Elements' and B4.FieldName ='GoodCutAndFentSOCounterCode'
and A.ABSUNIQUEID=B5.UNIQUEID and B5.NameEntityName='Elements' and B5.FieldName ='GoodCutAndFentSOCode'
and A.ABSUNIQUEID=B6.UNIQUEID and B6.NameEntityName='Elements' and B6.FieldName ='GoodCutAndFentRemarks'
and A.ABSUNIQUEID=B7.UNIQUEID and B7.NameEntityName='Elements' and B7.FieldName ='GoodCutAndFentTareWeight'
and A.ABSUNIQUEID=B8.UNIQUEID and B8.NameEntityName='Elements' and B8.FieldName ='GoodCutAndFentPackingUM'
and A.ABSUNIQUEID=B9.UNIQUEID and B9.NameEntityName='Elements' and B9.FieldName ='GoodCutAndFentPrimaryUM'
and A.ABSUNIQUEID=B10.UNIQUEID and B10.NameEntityName='Elements' and B10.FieldName ='GoodCutAndFentPlant'
and A.ABSUNIQUEID=B11.UNIQUEID and B11.NameEntityName='Elements' and B11.FieldName ='GoodCutAndFentPackingForm'
and A.CompanyCode=C.CompanyCode and SlipNo=C.SlipNo and C.SeqNo=1 and A.ItemTypeCode=C.ElementItemTypeCode
and A.SubcodeKey=C.ElementSubcodeKey and A.Code=C.ElementCode and A.CompanyCode=D.CompanyCode
and C.FromSTTransactionNumber=D.TransactionNumber and C.FromSTTransactionDetailNumber=D.TransactionDetailNumber
and A.CompanyCode=E.CompanyCode and C.ToSTTransactionNumber=E.TransactionNumber
and C.ToSTTransactionDetailNumber=E.TransactionDetailNumber
and SLIPNO='57575763636'
This query return 1 row.
Then i created a view on this query except condition SLIPNO='57575763636'
Now when i use the view as shown below return two rows.
select * from ViewGoodCutAndFent WHERE SLIPNO = '57575763636'
I am not able to determine where is problem area is. Thanks & Regards

In the query SLIPNO is probably C.SlipNo
In the view SLIPNO is probably B1.ValueString

Similar Messages

Query returns more row than expected

1. select * from view_name where col1 = 'value1' returns 12 rows
2. select * from (view script) where col1 = 'value1' returns 24 rows
i have a view called view_name. If i use view_name directly in the query, it returns 12 rows. But if i use the select script directly in from clause, it returns more rows. I am not able to find out why it is happening so. Any pointers will be helpful.

Are you saying that the SQL for view_name and view_script are identical? Can you post them?

Can oracle function return more than one value

Hi All
please answer can oracle function return more than one value
need one schenario
regards

Can any function, irrespective of the language, return multiple values?
OF COURSE NOT!!
So why do you think Oracle will now suddenly do it differently than all other languages? Never mind that it is impossible for a function (a unit/module of code) returning a memory address, to return multiple memory addresses. The machine code that does that, has not been yet been designed/implemented.
I am continually amazed that this question is asked. It is about something so fundamental in almost every single 3rd and 4th generation language... something that is taught right at the start... the definition of what a procedure and what a function is.
Sorry, but I simply cannot pull punches on this subject and smooth it over. There is something fundamentally wrong with your training as a programmer if you have to ask such a question about a function.
And whatever programming skills you build on such a foundation, will be seriously lacking.
I kindly suggest that you get back to the very basics of programming - and review and revisit until you fully understand it. There are no shortcuts in becomming a good programmer.
Message was edited by:
Billy Verreynne

Wifi--more trouble than its worth??

it seems like pretty much every discussion in the iTouch category has to do with wifi problems. im looking into getting a router, but before i do, is wifi more trouble than its worth?? whats your opinon?

rockon44grl wrote:
i did ask for help on a problem. my problem was wheather or not i should get a wifi router, and i ASKed peoples opinions.
Sorry, What I meant was that the 99% of users who are working well aren't posting here. Only the 1% who have troubles come to this site.
mrtotes

Fetch returns more rows

Hi,
I have the following table:
ID number, not null, unique
fname varchar2(50),not null
lname varchar2(50), not null
email varchar2(200)not null, uniqueand the following procedure that queries the table:
declare
name varchar2(100);
email varchar2(500);
stmt varchar2(4000);
nbr number;
begin
name:=substr('sam wilkins:[email protected]',1,(instr('sam wilkins:[email protected]',':')-1));
email:=substr('sam wilkins:[email protected]',(instr('sam wilkins:[email protected]',':')+1));
stmt:='select id from tbl where '
      || 'fname ||'' ''||'
      || 'lname='|| ''''||lower(name)||''''||' and email='||''''||lower(email)||''''||'';
execute immediate stmt into nbr;
select id into nbr from tbl where fname||' '||lname = name and email = email;
dbms_output.put_line(stmt);
dbms_output.put_line(nbr);
end;When I run the procedure with just the execute immediate, the query returns just one id, but when I use the select into, I get the 'Fetch returns more rows' error. Why is this?
Thanks.

Hi,
natet wrote:
Hi,
I have the following table:
ID number, not null, unique
fname varchar2(50),not null
lname varchar2(50), not null
email varchar2(200)not null, uniqueand the following procedure that queries the table:
declare
name varchar2(100);
email varchar2(500);
stmt varchar2(4000);
nbr number;
begin
name:=substr('sam wilkins:[email protected]',1,(instr('sam wilkins:[email protected]',':')-1));
email:=substr('sam wilkins:[email protected]',(instr('sam wilkins:[email protected]',':')+1));
stmt:='select id from tbl where '
|| 'fname ||'' ''||'
|| 'lname='|| ''''||lower(name)||''''||' and email='||''''||lower(email)||''''||'';
execute immediate stmt into nbr;
select id into nbr from tbl where fname||' '||lname = name and email = email;
dbms_output.put_line(stmt);
dbms_output.put_line(nbr);
end;When I run the procedure with just the execute immediate, the query returns just one id, but when I use the select into, I get the 'Fetch returns more rows' error. Why is this?
Thanks.Give your local variables names that cannot be confused for column names.
In this statement:
select id
into      nbr
from      tbl
where      fname ||' '|| lname     = name
and      email                      = email;email (in both places) refers to the column in the table. No doubt you want to use the local variable in place of one of them.

DECODE is not working in WHERE clause when subquery returns more rows

Hi Gurus,
I want to write a query on CCENTERS table(Script given below) and expect the following result:
1. When I pass a value of 0 for ID, It returns all the rows given in the table.
2. When I pass a value other than 0, It returns the row for the given value as well as all its child records.
CCENTER has parent-child relationship in ID and BASE column. I am using a query with DECODE function. but DECODE function in WHERE clause is not capable of handling sub-query with multiple rows.
VARIABLE ParaCCenter NUMBER
BEGIN
:paraccenter:=0;
END;
CREATE TABLE ccenters
(id NUMBER,
name VARCHAR2(20),
base number);
INSERT INTO ccenters VALUES(1,'NUST',null);
INSERT INTO ccenters VALUES(2,'SEECS',1);
INSERT INTO ccenters VALUES(3,'NBS',1);
commit;
SELECT * FROM ccenters
WHERE id IN DECODE(:ParaCCenter, 0, id,
(SELECT id FROM ccenters
START WITH base=:ParaCCenter
CONNECT BY PRIOR id = base
UNION
SELECT :ParaCCenter FROM dual
BEGIN
:paraCCenter:=1;
END;
SELECT * FROM ccenters
WHERE id IN DECODE(:ParaCCenter, 0, id,
(SELECT id FROM ccenters
START WITH base=:ParaCCenter
CONNECT BY PRIOR id = base
UNION
SELECT :ParaCCenter FROM dual))
The result is
(SELECT id FROM ccenters
ERROR at line 3:
ORA-01427: single-row subquery returns more than one row
How this query can be rewritten for the given functionality. Any response will be highly appreciated.
Thanks

And if you want to use DECODE:
SQL> BEGIN
2 :paraccenter:=0;
3 END;
4 /
PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
SQL> select *
2    from ccenters
3    where :paraccenter = decode(:paraccenter,0,0,id)
4 /
        ID NAME                       BASE
         1 NUST
         2 SEECS                         1
         3 NBS                           1
SQL> BEGIN
2 :paraccenter:=2;
3 END;
4 /
PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
SQL> select *
2    from ccenters
3    where :paraccenter = decode(:paraccenter,0,0,id)
4 /
        ID NAME                       BASE
         2 SEECS                         1
SQL> SY.

Oracle Procedure returning more number of records

Hi,
I have created an Oracle Procedure which is supposed to fetch a record as per the input parameter passed.
The core query in the procedure is as below -
SELECT DISTINCT col1 FROM my_tab WHERE col2 = 'Input parameter'
Few of the input parms (col2) has more number of records (col1) and so the procedure gives an error like -
'ORA-01422: exact fetch returns more than requested number of rows'
Could you please let me know how can I modify the procedure so that it would return more number of records as the case may be?
Thank you!

It still gives me the same error when it encounters more than one output.Yes, I'm sure it does.
But we can't tell you how to fix it because we don't know what you want.
What's the purpose of the procedure?
Is it to "spell check" the name of an intermediary? If so, you'll need to figure out what to do when you have more then one person with the same name.
You can add AND ROWNUM = 1. Or perhaps you can trap the too_many_rows exception.
Your procedure doesn't return anything (no out variables). Is that correct?
Or is the purpose of the procedure to return the ID of the matching name?

Oracle view returns incomplete result

Hello, I have a view on oracle table, but sometimes I found the result from the view is not complete.
It only returns part of the rows, at the meanwhile, the performance becomes very bad.
(the only change on the table is a new index be created on it)
After a did the table EXP / IMP, the performance back to normal (this is what I expedted), AND THE VIEW RETURNS FULL RESULT!
It is so weird I cannot believe this can happen...
Is it possilbe that oracle returns incompleted result rows without error?
Edited by: user2406411 on 20-May-2012 10:06 AM
Edited by: user2406411 on 20-May-2012 10:07 AM

It only returns part of the rows, at the meanwhile, the performance becomes very bad.does it mean the select from view has been stopped/interrupted before it finished itself?
Oracle could choose different plan with the index introduced. This plan could return first portion of rows fast, then continue to work on following portion, ant that took more time, but you did not want to wait and stop it.
After exp/imp oracle may choose different plan that returns all rows at once.
Is it possilbe that oracle returns incompleted result rows without error?normally not.
though years ago I had one similar situation. The cause was a corrupted index. If query used index it returned less rows, with full scan - more. I had to rebuild the index to fix it.

Sender JDBC adapter SELECT / UPDATE issue - updates more rows than selected

Hi,
We have configured a Sender JDBC Adapter to poll records from an Oracle table based on a flag field and then update the flag for the selected records. When tested in DEV and QA environments (where test data comes in intermittently and not in huge volumes), itu2019s working fine.
Both SELECT and UPDATE queries written in the Sender JDBC adapter are getting properly executed and are changing the status of the flag for the selected records from Y to N once read from the database.
select * from <table> where flag = 'N'.
update <table> set flag = 'Y' where flag = 'N'.
But in the PROD environment (with records getting updated in the database every second), after XI executes the SELECT query and just before the UPDATE query is executed, new records come into the Oracle table with status flag 'N". So when the UPDATE query runs just after the SELECT query, then these unselected records also get updated to 'Y'. Thus these records never get into the resultset and hence XI and thus remain unprocessed.
So when XI does a SELECT and UPDATE on the Oracle DB table and concurrently there is an INSERT happening into the table from the other end, the JDBC sender adapter is picking up a certain number of records but updating the status of more records than it picked up.
So how does XI deal with such a common scenario without dropping records?
Thanks,
Vishak

The condition being checked is the same for both SELECT and UPDATE statements.
Initially I tried setting transaction isolation levels on the database to repeatable_read and serializable but it was throwing me a java.sql.SQLException error saying that these transaction levels were not valid.
I asked for these transaction level permissions for the XI user from my DBA but the DB I am accessing provides only a view into other databases and so it's not possible.

Control array's scrollbar shows more rows than dimensions

When an array's dimension and Number of Rows property are set to the same value, its vertical scrollbar is shown and implies there is one more row available in the array than the actual array size.
This happen only if the array is a control, not when it is an indicator. As an indicator, no scrollbar is shown at run time. In edit mode, a scrollbar is shown when as an indicator.
Is there a way to not have the scollbar appear if the number of rows equals the array size yet have it appear when the number of rows is less than the array size ?
Example vi attached.
Attachments:
Array scroll bar dimension.vi ‏18 KB

Jennifer,
In practice, the number of displayed array rows is restricted so that only enough rows are shown to remain within the bounds of the front panel. Otherwise as the array size is increased, the array will extend off the bottom of the screen. My modified version shows this restriction. But notice that as a control, the array shows one more dimension than it had been allocated to (and is shown as a disabled row). In fact, clicking on the bottom arrow of the scollbar will continue to add more rows to the array control.
Steve
Attachments:
Array scroll bar dimension.vi ‏22 KB

More rows than I cna handle

I have written a small JSP application.
It accesses an oracle DB and returns may rows.
If the no of rows is too large the the buttons used to navigate the app dissapear off the bottom of the screen.
(I know I should have considered but I ma new to developing)
Does anyone have code that uses jdbc/sql to count the rrows and links the count to a next and previous button.
the next and previous button would rerender the existing form but with the next 10 rows or the previous rows.
Many Thanks.
Peter

u can have 2 fns in the java script like this..
function getNextRows(begin,end){}
function getPrevRows(begin,end)
in the body section u can set a value for nav and activate the javascript fns using the choice like this..
String nav = (request.getParameter("nav")==null)?"next":request.getParameter("nav");
          if (nav.equals("next"))
          {/display}
          if (nav.equals("prev"))
          {/display}
the value for begin and end ex: begin =0;end=10
int begin = Integer.parseInt((request.getParameter("begin")==null)?"0":request.getParameter("begin"));
          int end = Integer.parseInt((request.getParameter("end")==null)?"10":request.getParameter("end"));
display 10 recs at a time
if (begin > 10)
Previous);
if(begin < max)
Next);
hope this helps

Batch input: how to fill in more rows than the ones for the screen's size.

Hi everybody,
I am working on a batch input for transaction ME38.
When, through my abap code, I am filling in the second screen's table, the system stops, telling me there is no field "43" on the screen.
Here is a summary of the batch input:
EKET-MENGE(1)               66,000
RM06E-EEIND(1)     30.06.2009
EKET-MENGE(31)               66,000
RM06E-EEIND(31)     30.06.2009
EKET-MENGE(43)               66,000
RM06E-EEIND(43)     30.06.2009
In fact, my screen has 31 lines, but 43 entries must be filled.
I can program a logic to go to the next screen when entry 31 has been filled, but how to know what is the screen limit?
Because my program will not always be started by me, and will, most probably, be started in background jobs...
Do you see a way to process that can help me?
Is there a way to not be "screen size dependant"?
Thanks in advance for your help.
Regards,
Rudy

Hi...
This issue can be resolved by creating a recording in SHDB transaction for 43 records and press add more rows button evytime you do that..
As the rows will be added to the table during runtime you need not worry about the limit of the table entries.. and it will work fine..
Hope this helps

Using ROWID returns less rows than if use distinct in query

Hi,
I am writting the following query to get distinct purchase order number from a specific received date. this returns me total 620 rows.:
select distinct pha.segment1 from apps.po_headers_all pha, apps.RCV_TRANSACTIONS rcv
where 1=1
and trunc(rcv.transaction_date) between to_date(:P_FROM_DATE,'YYYY/MM/DD HH24:MI:SS') and to_date(:P_TO_DATE,'YYYY/MM/DD HH24:MI:SS')
and pha.po_header_id=rcv.po_header_id
and pha.type_lookup_code='STANDARD'
and pha.authorization_status ='APPROVED'
and pha.cancel_flag='N'
if i write the query using ROWID to get the distinct Purchase order number its giving me 580 rows:
select pha.segment1 from apps.po_headers_all pha, apps.RCV_TRANSACTIONS rcv
where 1=1
and trunc(rcv.transaction_date) between to_date(:P_FROM_DATE,'YYYY/MM/DD HH24:MI:SS') and to_date(:P_TO_DATE,'YYYY/MM/DD HH24:MI:SS')
and pha.po_header_id=rcv.po_header_id
and rcv.rowid=(select max(rowid) from apps.RCV_TRANSACTIONS rcv where rcv.po_header_id=pha.po_header_id)
and pha.type_lookup_code='STANDARD'
and pha.authorization_status ='APPROVED'
and pha.cancel_flag='N';
Can anyone tell me why? I want to use this ROWID query in a valueset in oracle apps.

That's probably because some purchase orders have rcv transactions out of the range (p_from_date, p_to_date). You should include the condition on the dates in the (select max(rowid)...) subquery as well. And more generally, the first query seems like a better/simpler choice than the second one.
Hope it helps.

Is there a way in Oracle to return multiple rows as a single string?

Hi gurus,
I just got help from your guys fixing my dynamic sql problem. What I am doing in that function is to return a single string from multiple rows and I use it in the select statement. It works fine once the problem was solved. But is there any way in Oracle to do this in the select statement only? I have a table that stores incidents (incident_id is the PK) and another table that stores the people that are involved in an incident.
Incident_table
(incident_id number PK);
Incident_people_table
(incident_id number PK/FK,
person_id number PK);
Now in a report, I need to return the multiple rows of the Incident_People_table as a single string separated by a comma, for example, 'Ben, John, Mark'. I asked the SQL Server DBA about this and he told me he can do that in SQL Server by using a variable in the sql statement and SQL Server will auomatically iterate the rows and concatenate the result (I have not seen his actual work). Is there a similar way in Oracle? I have seen some examples here for some similar requests using the sys_connect_by_path, but I wonder if it is feasible in a report sql that is already rather complex. Or should I just stick to my simpler funcion?
Thanks.
Ben

Hi,
May be, this example will help you.
SQL> CREATE TABLE Incident_Table(
2    incident_id number
3 );
Table created.
SQL> CREATE TABLE Person_Table(
2    person_id number,
3    person_name VARCHAR2(200)
4 );
Table created.
SQL> CREATE TABLE Incident_People_Table(
2    incident_id number,
3    person_id number
4 );
Table created.
SQL> SELECT * FROM Incident_Table;
INCIDENT_ID
          1
          2
SQL> SELECT * FROM Person_Table;
PERSON_ID PERSON_NAME
         1 John
         2 Mark
         3 Ben
         4 Sam
SQL> SELECT * FROM Incident_People_Table;
INCIDENT_ID PERSON_ID
          1          1
          1          2
          1          3
          2          1
          2          2
          2          4
6 rows selected.
SQL> SELECT IT.*,
2    (
3      WITH People_Order AS (
4        SELECT IPT.incident_id, person_id, PT.person_name,
5          ROW_NUMBER() OVER (PARTITION BY IPT.incident_id ORDER BY PT.person_name) AS Order_Num,
6          COUNT(*) OVER (PARTITION BY IPT.incident_id) AS incident_people_cnt
7        FROM Incident_People_Table IPT
8          JOIN Person_Table PT USING(person_id)
9      )
10      SELECT SUBSTR(SYS_CONNECT_BY_PATH(PO.person_name, ', '), 3) AS incident_people_list
11      FROM (SELECT * FROM People_Order PO WHERE PO.incident_id = IT.incident_id) PO
12      WHERE PO.incident_people_cnt = LEVEL
13      START WITH PO.Order_Num = 1
14      CONNECT BY PRIOR PO.Order_Num = PO.Order_Num - 1
15    ) AS incident_people_list
16 FROM Incident_Table IT
17 ;
INCIDENT_ID INCIDENT_PEOPLE_LIST
          1 Ben, John, Mark
          2 John, Mark, SamRegards,
Dima

Sqlldr Loading more rows than expected

We are trying to load a child table that has the referential integrity constraint with its parent and some triggers on it that is used to change the case of data. We are using the bcp to create a text file that is having the 5 records. The text file generated from BCP is a kind of CSV (~ is used for ,) file. When we are trying to load the reords using sqlldr it is loading 10 records in the database. It happens when 2 last rows are violating the integrity constraint thus the first 3 records are being duplicated and violated records are also loaded. Strange thing is that the same record that was loaded is being pushed in the bad file also. When we disable the trigger everything works fine. To get your help following is the snap of trigger and ctl files along with sample data:
CREATE OR REPLACE TRIGGER "CMD".RWC_SPCL_HANDLING_INSTRCTNS
before insert or update on RWC_SPCL_HANDLING_INSTRCTNS
REFERENCES NEW AS NEW
for each row
BEGIN
:new.ORG_ROADMARK:=upper(:new.ORG_ROADMARK);
:new.RWC_CD:=upper(:new.RWC_CD);
:new.SPCL_HANDLING_CD:=upper(:new.SPCL_HANDLING_CD);
EXCEPTION
WHEN OTHERS THEN RETURN;
END;
---------CTL FILE-------------
load data
infile 'data\rwc_spcl_handling_instrctns.txt'
into table rwc_spcl_handling_instrctns truncate
fields terminated by '~'
trailing nullcols
(ORG_ROADMARK ,
RWC_CD ,
SPCL_HANDLING_CD,
RWC_SPCL_HNDLNG_INSTRCTN_ID "rwc_sqn.nextval"
-SAMPLE DATA--------
GSWR~CARCHTADO1~SLC
GSWR~CARCHTBUO1~SLC
GSWR~CARCHTCOO1~SLC
GSWR~CARSTRCANO~SHL
GSWR~CARSTRCANO~SLC
Thanks,
Ashok

Why not include the UPPER in the control file
load data
infile 'data\rwc_spcl_handling_instrctns.txt'
into table rwc_spcl_handling_instrctns truncate
fields terminated by '~'
trailing nullcols
(ORG_ROADMARK "UPPER(:ORG_ROADMARK)" ,
RWC_CD "UPPER(:RWC_CD)" ,
SPCL_HANDLING_CD "UPPER(:SPCL_HANDLING_CD)" ,
RWC_SPCL_HNDLNG_INSTRCTN_ID "rwc_sqn.nextval"

Oracle view return more rows than its base query

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for