ORDER BY Clause in XMLAGG is throwing errors.
Hi,
I'm getting errors when generating the XML using the ORDER BY clause in the XMLAgg function. Although, running the SQL directly in SQL Plus doesn't have any problem.
Here is the PL/SQL sample.
DECLARE
vX_XML SYS.XMLTYPE;
vCL_XML CLOB;
BEGIN
SELECT XMLElement("GROUP",
XMLAttributes(Group_Id AS "ID", Group_Name AS "NAME", Group_Description AS "DESC"),
XMLAgg(XMLElement("FIELD",
XMLAttributes(Field_Id AS "ID", Field_Description AS "DESC",
Table_Name AS "TAB_NM", Rule_Name AS "RULE_NM",
Field_Hierarchy_Depth AS "DOL_VAR_CALC")) ORDER BY Field_Description))
INTO vX_XML
FROM (SELECT g.Group_Id, g.Group_Name, g.Group_Description, f.Field_Id, f.Field_Description,
DECODE(f.Table_Name, 'ESTIMATES', 'E', 'LINE_ITEMS', 'L', NULL) Table_Name,
rt.Rule_Name,
CASE NVL(f.Field_Hierarchy_Depth, 0) WHEN 0 THEN 'N' ELSE 'Y' END Field_Hierarchy_Depth
FROM GROUPS g,
Rules r,
Rule_Types rt,
Fields f
WHERE g.Group_Id = 3087
AND r.Group_Id_Fk = g.Group_Id
AND rt.Rule_Type_Id = r.Rule_Type_Id_Fk
AND f.Field_Id = r.Field_Id_Fk) tab
GROUP BY Group_Id, Group_Name, Group_Description;
vCL_XML := vX_XML.GetCLOBVal();
END;
And, here are the errors.
ERROR at line 8:
ORA-06550: line 8, column 23:
PLS-00306: wrong number or types of arguments in call to 'XMLAGG'
ORA-06550: line 8, column 23:
PL/SQL: ORA-00904: "XMLAGG": invalid identifier
ORA-06550: line 6, column 5:
PL/SQL: SQL Statement ignored
Thanks in Advance.
BTW, we are using Oracle 9.2.0.4.
This is bug 2785463 with no ETA for a fix
regards
Coby D. Adams Jr.
Similar Messages
-
Evaluate Expression in Order By Clause
Hi,
I'm having trouble to execute following JPQL.
Select r.firstname, r.lastname, (e.distance/e.duration) from Runner r Inner Join r.event e Order BY (e.distance/e.duration) Desc;
Error suggests that '(' character is unacceptable in Order By Clause. Here is the error.
javax.servlet.ServletException: java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: An exception occurred while creating a query in EntityManager:
Exception Description: Syntax error parsing the query [Select r.firstname, r.lastname, (e.distance/e.duration) from Runner r Inner Join r.event e Order BY (e.distance/e.duration) Desc;], line 1, column 101: unexpected token [(].
Internal Exception: NoViableAltException(81!=[1328:1: orderByItem returns [Object node] : (n= stateFieldPathExpression (a= ASC | d= DESC | ) | i= IDENT (a= ASC | d= DESC | ) );])
Can someone please show me how to fix it.
Thanks,
AdamHello Adam
You cannot use "(e.distance/e.duration)" as an order by clause. The correct query would be:
"Select r.firstname, r.lastname, (e.distance/e.duration) as speed from Runner r Inner Join r.event e Order BY speed Desc"
but will not work until bug https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=331575 is fixed. Please vote for it.
Best Regards,
Chris -
HAVING clause, or ORDER BY clause ....ERROR
hi i have following query which throws error plz find the solution for the query to go safe..
Select C.src_cd,
D.src_nm,
count(*) supp_clm_count,
(CASE WHEN A.clm_ttladjamt > 0 then A.clm_ttladjamt else A.clm_ttlreqamt END) as amount
From IWOWNER.WC_clm A,
IWOWNER.WC_clm_srvc B,
SHOWNER.WC_SRC C,
SHOWNER.WC_SRC_lang D
where A.clm_id = B.clm_id
and A.rcv_loc_id = C.src_id
and C.src_id = D.src_id
and TRANSLATE(A.clm_rqst_type_cd) = 'SUPPLIERCLAIM'
and TRANSLATE(A.clm_typ_cd) in ('WARRANTY','PRE-DELIVERY')
and DATE(A.clm_create_dt) between '01/01/2000' and '01/01/2010'
Group by C.src_cd, D.src_nm
ERROR:
SQLSTATE: 42803, SQLERRMC: CLM_TTLADJAMT
Message: An expression starting with "CLM_TTLADJAMT" specified in a SELECT clause, HAVING clause, or ORDER BY clause is not specified in the GROUP BY clause or it is in a SELECT clause, HAVING clause, or ORDER BY clause with a column function and no GROUP BY clause is specifiedHi,
With analytic function
/* Formatted on 2009/07/22 10:47 (Formatter Plus v4.8.8) */
SELECT DISTINCT c.src_cd, d.src_nm,
COUNT (1) OVER (PARTITION BY c.src_cd, d.src_nm)
supp_clm_count,
SUM (CASE
WHEN a.clm_ttladjamt > 0
THEN a.clm_ttladjamt
ELSE a.clm_ttlreqamt
END
) OVER (PARTITION BY c.src_cd, d.src_nm) AS amount
FROM iwowner.wc_clm a,
iwowner.wc_clm_srvc b,
showner.wc_src c,
showner.wc_src_lang d
WHERE a.clm_id = b.clm_id
AND a.rcv_loc_id = c.src_id
AND c.src_id = d.src_id
AND a.clm_rqst_type_cd = 'SUPPLIERCLAIM'
AND a.clm_typ_cd IN ('WARRANTY', 'PRE-DELIVERY')
AND a.clm_create_dt BETWEEN TO_DATE ('01/01/2000', 'dd/mm/yyyy')
AND TO_DATE ('01/01/2010', 'dd/mm/yyyy') -
Error : The ORDER BY clause is invalid in views, inline functions, derived
Hi All,
I am on 11g 6.2, Windows Server 2008, my db SQL server 2008, I am facing the error for the reports in which I am trying to edit one the column formula and do something like 'abc/sum(abc)*100'.
10058. [NQODBC] [SQL_STATE: HY000] [nQSError: 10058] A general error has occurred. [nQSError: 43113] Message returned from OBIS. [nQSError: 43119] Query Failed: [nQSError: 16001] ODBC error state: 37000 code: 8180 message: [Microsoft][ODBC SQL Server Driver][SQL Server]Statement(s) could not be prepared.. [nQSError: 16001] ODBC error state: 37000 code: 1033 message: [Microsoft][ODBC SQL Server Driver][SQL Server]The ORDER BY clause is invalid in views, inline functions, derived tables, subqueries, and common table expressions, unless TOP or FOR XML is also specified.. [nQSError: 16002] Cannot obtain number of columns for the query result. (HY000)
One of the solutions to this which I have found is to edit the EXPRESSION_IN_ORDERBY_SUPPORTED feature in the db properties.
I want to know what does EXPRESSION_IN_ORDERBY_SUPPORTED means?
When I create a calculations in 11g like abc/sum(abc) in the column formula for a column then i get this error.
What does this error mean? Does OBIEE 11g doesn't support using these expressions in the report and the fact that it applies the order by clause to the reports, the report fail?
Could anybody please explain the issue. There is very limited information on this over the web.
Thanks in advance.
RonnyThanks svee for the quick response, actually i had resolved the issue by unchecking the EXPRESSION_IN_ORDERBY_SUPPORTED option in the database. I want to understand how does that makes the difference?
What does EXPRESSION_IN_ORDERBY_SUPPORTED mean? Does it mean that if I give any expression in my answers report and since obiee uses a order by for all the queries, the expression won't be supported?
Please explain. -
ORA-00907: missing right parenthesis when using group by clause with xmlagg
I have the following query and I am getting ORA 00907 Error when I am using group by clause with the xmlagg function.
select xmlelement("Mitigation",
xmlelement("m_szMethodName",tm.DisplayName),
xmlelement("SubstanceInterferenceProtocolList",
(select xmlagg(xmlelement("MitigationProtocol",
xmlelement("m_szMethodName",tm.DisplayName),
xmlelement("m_szInterferenceProtocolName",tmp.protocol_name),
xmlelement("m_szInterferenceSubstance",tmp.intf_mtrl_prod_code),
xmlelement("m_ProtocolParameters",
xmlelement("m_szProtocolName",tmp.protocol_name),
xmlelement("m_Consumables",
xmlelement("Consumable",
xmlelement("m_szConsumId", xrl.rgnt_pack_name),
xmlelement("m_szProductCode",xrl.pack_prod_code),
xmlelement("m_nVolume",tmp.fluid_vol),
xmlelement("m_szProtocolStep",xps.protocol_step_name))),
xmlelement("m_ProtParamList",
xmlagg(
xmlelement("ParameterValues",
xmlelement("m_szProtocolName",tmp.protocol_name),
xmlelement("m_Time",xpsd.parameter_ntime_value))
group by tmp.ccd_test_id,tmp.intf_mtrl_prod_code)
order by tmp.ccd_test_id, tmp.intf_mtrl_prod_code, xps.protocol_step_intprotocolstep )
from XPR_tdef_mitigation_protocol tmp, xp_reagentlist xrl,
xpr_protocol_settings xps, xpr_protocol_settings_default xpsd
where tmp.ccd_test_id = tm.ccd_test_id
and tmp.ccd_test_id = xrl.ccd_test_id
and tmp.pack_prod_code = xrl.pack_prod_code
and tmp.intf_type = 1
and xps.protocol_name = xpsd.protocol_name
and xps.protocol_step_name = xpsd.protocol_step_name
and xps.ps_action_parameterlist = xpsd.ps_action_parameterlist
and xps.protocol_name = tmp.PROTOCOL_NAME
from XPtoXPRTdef_defn_mapping tm
where tm.DisplayName = 'SYPH'If I remove the xmlagg clause along with the group by clause, the query runs fine and give me the output.
But in that XML format of the output is incorrect for my application.
Could someone help here?Hi,
userAtoZ wrote:
I have the following query and I am getting ORA 00907 Error when I am using group by clause with the xmlagg function.
... xmlagg(
xmlelement("ParameterValues",
xmlelement("m_szProtocolName",tmp.protocol_name),
xmlelement("m_Time",xpsd.parameter_ntime_value))
group by tmp.ccd_test_id,tmp.intf_mtrl_prod_code)Please don't post unformatted code. When posting any formatted text on this site, type these 6 characters:
\(small letters only, inside curly brackets) before and after each section of formatted text, to preserve spacing.
If the code above were formatted well, so that you could match each '(' with its closing ')', it would look something like this:... xmlagg ( xmlelement ( "ParameterValues"
, xmlelement ( "m_szProtocolName"
, tmp.protocol_name
, xmlelement ( "m_Time"
, xpsd.parameter_ntime_value
group by tmp.ccd_test_id
, tmp.intf_mtrl_prod_code
This is exactly what you posted, only the whitespace has been changed.
This makes it clear that the GROUP BY is inside the parentheses with the argument to XMLAGG. You can have an ORDER BY clause there, but not a GROUP BY clause. -
Order by clause require dynamic value
Hi
I want to bind parameters to orderby clause. In where clause with bind parameter works fine. But in orderby clause ive done similar steps to have a dynamic sort which will be passed from the previous page in a session variable. Although it didnt show any error at the backend where i can see data getting binded, but no sorting is taking place.
Can u help me to solve this.
regards
JayashriJayashri,
I have tested this and you are right. And there does occur an error at the backend, only you wont see it unless you run with BC4J debug mode turned on. You can do this by providing -Djbo.debugoutput=console to the JVM. When running inside JDeveloper, you can accomplish this by going to Project Properties => PRofiles => Development => "Runner", and fill this in at the "Java Options" field.
Doing that will show the reason of the problem. When a view object is queried, BC4J actually performs 2 queries. One to obtain the 'estimated row count', and then one to obtain the action rows.
Now suppose your query looks like this:
SELECT <somefields> FROM <table>
WHERE <field> = :1 ORDER BY :2
Bc4j will construct the following query to obtain the estimated rowcount:
SELECT count(1) FROM (SELECT <somefields> FROM <table> WHERE <field> = :1)
As you can see, it does NOT include the ORDER BY of the original query in this statement, probably for performance reasons (why order the set if you are only interested in the count). Unfortunately, it WILL try to bind both :1 AND :2 to this query, but because there is only one bind variable in this query, this throws an java.sql.SQLException which is unfortunately trapped somewhere in BC4J code, and not shown in the regular log file.
I am pretty confident that this is actually a BC4J bug (or known restriction). You could post this problem at the JDeveloper Forum to determine this (without mentioning JHeadstart, because this would also happen if you wrote your own code for binding these parameters).
As for a workaround, you could try the following:
1.) Remove the (bind parameter from) the order by clause on the ViewObject
2.) Remove that same bind parameter from the "Query Bind Parameters" property.
You should now have gone back to a scenario where there are only bind parameters on the where clause. You would need to set the OrderBy clause programatically now. To do this, extend the JhsDataAction for this page, and override the method 'applyIterBindParams()'. Before calling super, try something like:
ViewObject vo = ib.getRowSetIterator().getRowSet().getViewObject();
vo.setOrderByClause(<your dynamic orderby>);
Kind regards,
Peter Ebell
JHeadstart Team -
Where to place ORDER BY clause when a query includes UNION
I have a query that has UNION in it. could you please tell me where to place the ORDER BY clause. Because it's throwing an error if i place the ORDER BY clause at the end
Because you are using the UNION set operator, you need to either specifically list your columns or use positional notation.
Without a set operator we can order by the column name without specifically listing it:
SQL> select * from dual
2 order by dummy;
D
X
1 row selected.This doesn't work once you introduce a set operator:
SQL> ed
Wrote file afiedt.buf
1 select * from dual union all
2 select * from dual union all
3 select * from dual
4* order by dummy
SQL> /
order by dummy
ERROR at line 4:
ORA-00904: "DUMMY": invalid identifierSo you need to either use positional notation:
SQL> ed
Wrote file afiedt.buf
1 select * from dual union all
2 select * from dual union all
3 select * from dual
4* order by 1
SQL> /
D
X
X
X
3 rows selected.Or, specifically list or alias the columns you are projecting:
SQL> ed
Wrote file afiedt.buf
1 select dummy from dual union all
2 select dummy from dual union all
3 select dummy from dual
4* order by dummy
SQL> /
D
X
X
X
3 rows selected.
SQL> ed
Wrote file afiedt.buf
1 select dummy as d from dual union all
2 select dummy as d from dual union all
3 select dummy as d from dual
4* order by d
SQL> /
D
X
X
X
3 rows selected.cheers,
Anthony -
If there r MULTIPLE entries of different in my_itab, throw ERROR??
Hi Experts,
Am filling the my_itab(which does hv 1 filed of Order), by doing some processing.
Always, the Order # shuld b the same.
If in any case, there r multiple Orders in this itab of DIFFERENT, I need throw ERROR message.
So, instead of looping the itab, checking each entry explicitly, Is there any Statement, Clause, sytax?
thanq
Edited by: Srinivas on Jul 16, 2008 1:46 PMHi,
Declare another varialbe of the Order type and assign the value to it.
w_order = itab-order.
Loop itab where itab-order = w_order.
if w_order eq itab-order.
message 'Same order number' type 'E'.
endif.
w_order = itab-order.
endloop.
Reward if helpful.
Regards
Chandralekha -
Hi BI Experts,
I have an issue in the report output. The query is giving the data but the report is not showing the same.
when nonexisting values are given, report is throwing ERROR instead of giving blank page. Client is expecting blank page or dummy page with tables or headings etc but not the error message.
Please suggest a solution for this.
Let me know if anybody needs any other information regarding this.
Thanks in advance.you need to use no data found logic in order to get blank or any message saying no data found for that selected value.
check this link
https://blogs.oracle.com/xmlpublisher/entry/no_data_found
or
send me your sample xml having data and no data and template i can try at my side. email: [email protected]
assign me some points if helpful -
Order by clause in cursor problem
Hello,
I'm unable to compile package body when i'm using order by clause in cursor subquery in stored procedure.
Sample code:
CREATE PACKAGE Announces AS
TYPE tRefCur IS REF CURSOR;
PROCEDURE TopAnnounces(
iiCount IN NUMBER,
osAnnounces OUT tRefCur,
oiRetVal OUT NUMBER
END Announces;
CREATE PACKAGE BODY Announces AS
PROCEDURE TopAnnounces(
iiCount IN NUMBER,
osAnnounces OUT NUMBER,
oiRetVal OUT NUMBER
AS
BEGIN
OPEN osAnnounces FOR
SELECT Id, Name, AnnCount FROM
SELECT Id, Name, COUNT(CategoryId) AS AnnCount FROM tblAnnounces
GROUP BY Id, Name
-- bellow is the line, where the code crash
ORDER BY AnnCount DESC
WHERE ROWNUM < iiCount + 1;
oiRetVal := 0;
EXCEPTION
WHEN OTHERS THEN
oiRetVal := -255;
END TopAnnounces;
END Announces;
If I compile the code above I will get this error:
PLS-00103: Encoutered the symbol "ORDER" when expecting on of the following:
After I remark the problematic line, the compilation is successful (but not the result :).
Is there something I'm doing wrong?
Thanks for advice
Vojtech Novacek
nullSorry you can not use order by clause into one temporal table created by subquery.
Put the order by clause offside of subquery.
Atte.
CC.
<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by Vojtech Novacek:
Hello,
I'm unable to compile package body when i'm using order by clause in cursor subquery in stored procedure.
Sample code:
CREATE PACKAGE Announces AS
TYPE tRefCur IS REF CURSOR;
PROCEDURE TopAnnounces(
iiCount IN NUMBER,
osAnnounces OUT tRefCur,
oiRetVal OUT NUMBER
END Announces;
CREATE PACKAGE BODY Announces AS
PROCEDURE TopAnnounces(
iiCount IN NUMBER,
osAnnounces OUT NUMBER,
oiRetVal OUT NUMBER
AS
BEGIN
OPEN osAnnounces FOR
SELECT Id, Name, AnnCount FROM
SELECT Id, Name, COUNT(CategoryId) AS AnnCount FROM tblAnnounces
GROUP BY Id, Name
-- bellow is the line, where the code crash
ORDER BY AnnCount DESC
WHERE ROWNUM < iiCount + 1;
oiRetVal := 0;
EXCEPTION
WHEN OTHERS THEN
oiRetVal := -255;
END TopAnnounces;
END Announces;
If I compile the code above I will get this error:
PLS-00103: Encoutered the symbol "ORDER" when expecting on of the following:
After I remark the problematic line, the compilation is successful (but not the result :).
Is there something I'm doing wrong?
Thanks for advice
Vojtech Novacek<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
null -
Order by clause in PL/SQL cursors
I am trying to execute a procedure with some input parameters. I open a cursor
with a select statement. However, the order by clause in the query does not
recognize parameter sent through the procedure input parameters.
For example:
open <<cursor name>> for
select id from member order by <<dynamic parameter>>" does not work (Compiles fine but does not return the right result).
But if I try and give a static order by <<column name>> it works. Is the
order by clause in the PL/SQL a compile time phenomenon?
I have also tried it through dynamic sql. All the other parameters work except the order by <<parameter>> asc|desc
Also "asc" and "desc" does not work if given dynamically.
What alternatives do I have?
nullI don't think order by can be dynamic in a cursor, but it sure can be using dynamic sql. The only issue is that you must do a replace in the sql string with the dynamic variable. For example:
create or replace procedure test_dyn(p_col in varchar2, p_order in varchar2) as
q varchar2(500);
u_exec_cur number;
u_columnnumber NUMBER;
u_columndate DATE;
u_columnvarchar varchar2(50);
u_cur_count number;
u_ename varchar2(20);
u_sal number;
begin
q := 'select ename, sal from scott.emp order by p_col p_order';
-- got to do these two replaces
q:= replace(q,'p_col',p_col);
q:= replace(q,'p_order',p_order);
u_exec_cur := dbms_sql.open_cursor;
dbms_sql.parse(u_exec_cur,q,dbms_sql.v7);
dbms_sql.define_column(u_exec_cur, 1, u_columnvarchar, 20);
dbms_sql.define_column(u_exec_cur, 2, u_columnnumber);
u_cur_count := dbms_sql.execute(u_exec_cur);
loop
exit when (dbms_sql.fetch_rows(u_exec_cur) <= 0);
dbms_sql.column_value(u_exec_cur, 1, u_ename);
dbms_sql.column_value(u_exec_cur, 2, u_sal);
dbms_output.put_line(u_ename);
dbms_output.put_line(u_sail);
--htp.p(u_ename);
--htp.p(u_sal);
end loop;
end;
show errors;
Now when when I execute my procedure I can change the order by clause all I want, for example:
SQL> set serveroutput on;
SQL> exec gmika.test_dyn('sal','asc');
SMITH
800
ADAMS
1100
WARD
1250
MARTIN
1250
MILLER
1300
TURNER
1500
ALLEN
1600
JLO
2222
BLAKE
2850
JONES
2975
SCOTT
3000
FORD
3000
LOKITZ
4500
KING
5000
JAMES
5151
JAMES
5555
PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
SQL>
null -
Hi,
Can we use order by clause in Sub query?
While using the order by clause, I am getting the "missing expression error" . If I remove order by clause query executing fine.
Here is my query:
select *
from emp_mstr
where emp_no in(select
emp_no
from emp_mstr
order by branch_no);
Thanks & Regards,
MahiMay be you miss some required spaces also, other than wrong use of ORDER BY
select *
from emp_mstr
where emp_no in
( select e2.emp_no
from emp_mstr e2
-- order by e2.branch_no
);Why do you want to ORDER BY in the subquery, which you use with IN clause? That will not make any difference in the result..Means the result you get with ORDER BY will be same as without that.. And in this case, ORDER by is a unncessary overhead.. And Ordering is very costly..
And why do you want to have the IN clause at all in your query? You are referring the same tables in the main query and sub query..
The below will give the same result
select *
from emp_mstr
where emp_no is not nullIf you want to use another table in the subquery, always use aliasess...
select *
from emp_mstr
where emp_no in
( select e2.emp_no
from emp_mstr2 e2
-- order by e2.branch_no
); -
Order by clause in discoverer custom folder
hi,
i m working on discoverer 3.1.38.I've been trying to sort the period according to calendar sequence and for this i tried 2-3 different queries which are working fine on sql plus but in discoverer custome folder,one error is coming saying ..can't use ORDER BY clause in custom folder.
I've tried formatting option also but it doesn't work here with me as i preferably want to sort in MON-RR format.
thanks in anticipation
nullthanks for replying back. but i didn't get what exactly u meant by creting query in user edition and about alternative sort,i should have list of value item and item_to_sort in same folder but i don't have that..i am creating one cross tab report and using to_char(gl_date,'MON-RR') format on my top axis its' appearing alphabetically over there,i wrote one qurey which worked prefecly fine on sql plus,but in discoverer its' giving me error.i can't create alternative sort on this,so please give me some different solution
thanks in advance -
Hi All,
I want to order my SELECT using "dynamic ORDER BY". I have a CURSOR (in my PL/SQL procedure) contains a select with ORDER BY clause. I have implemented two combobox in my form (the first contains the column name, the second contains ASC and DESC).I tried with the next:
1) Dynamic ORDER BY in CURSOR with combobox results. IT DOESN'T WORK.
2) Using a block property named "ORDER BY CLAUSE". Here I put, for example, :myBlock.comboColumnOrder. IT DOESN'T WORK.
3) Using a function: set_block_property(myBlock,order_by,:myBlock.comboColumnOrder) or set_block_property(myBlock,default_where,:myBlock.comboColumnOrder). IT DOESN'T WORK.
4) Using dynamic CURSOR: ORACLE FORMS give me an error that said: "...it can't to the CLIENT-SIDE".
I have thought my last solution, but it maybe cumbersome. I do a TEMPORARY TABLE, and my CURSOR insert in this TABLE, and then I'll fetch to my BLOCK.
Thanks a lot.
PS: My ORACLE Version is 10g.PROCEDURE CHEQUEAR_V0 IS
V_ORDEN VARCHAR2(50) := '' || :BLOCK_CHECK.ORDER_BY_NAME || ' ' || :BLOCK_CHECK.ORDER_BY_ASC_DES ;
CURSOR FILA_RESULTADO_TABLA IS
SELECT Last_name,First_name,App_user, App_role, UserDB
FROM adm_users
WHERE
((Last_name IS NULL OR Last_name LIKE '%'||:BLOCK_CHECK.Last_name||'%') AND
(First_name IS NULL OR First_name LIKE '%'||:BLOCK_CHECK.First_name||'%') AND
(App_user IS NULL OR App_user LIKE '%'||:BLOCK_CHECK.App_user||'%') AND
(App_role IS NULL OR App_role LIKE '%'||:BLOCK_CHECK.App_role||'%') AND
(UserDB IS NULL OR UserDB LIKE '%'||:BLOCK_CHECK.User_DB||'%'))
ORDER BY V_ORDEN;
V_Last_name VARCHAR2(50);
V_First_name VARCHAR2(50);
V_App_user VARCHAR2(50);
V_App_role VARCHAR2(50) ;
V_User_DB VARCHAR2(50);
CONT NUMBER ;
BEGIN
CONT := 1 ;
GO_BLOCK('BLOCK_APPS_GRANTS');
CLEAR_BLOCK;
SYNCHRONIZE;
OPEN FILA_RESULTADO_TABLA;
LOOP
FETCH FILA_RESULTADO_TABLA INTO V_Last_name,V_First_name,V_App_user,V_App_role,V_User_DB ;
EXIT WHEN FILA_RESULTADO_TABLA%NOTFOUND;
:BLOCK_APPS_GRANTS.Last_name := V_Last_name ;
:BLOCK_APPS_GRANTS.First_name := V_First_name ;
:BLOCK_APPS_GRANTS.App_user := V_App_user ;
:BLOCK_APPS_GRANTS.App_role := V_App_role ;
:BLOCK_APPS_GRANTS.User_DB := V_User_DB ;
NEXT_RECORD;
CONT := CONT+1;
END LOOP;
IF FILA_RESULTADO_TABLA%ISOPEN THEN
CLOSE FILA_RESULTADO_TABLA;
END IF;
SET_BLOCK_PROPERTY('BLOCK_APPS_GRANTS', ORDER_BY, :BLOCK_CHECK.ORDER_BY_NAME || ' ' || :BLOCK_CHECK.ORDER_BY_ASC_DES);
GO_BLOCK('BLOCK_APPS_GRANTS');
EXECUTE_QUERY;
synchronize;
exception when others then
raise;
END;
Thanks a lot.
Edited by: user11285646 on 22-jul-2009 2:30 -
Why I cannot use RowID in where clause but can use it in order by clause
I am on SQL Server 2008.
1. If I use
SELECT (ROW_NUMBER() over
(order by ImportId, ScenarioId, SiteID, AssetID, LocalSKUID, WEEKID, MonthID)) RowID, *
FROM [JnJ_Version1].[dbo].[td_Production_Week]
order by RowID
Statement works
But
2. If I use
SELECT (ROW_NUMBER() over
(order by ImportId, ScenarioId, SiteID, AssetID, LocalSKUID, WEEKID, MonthID)) RowID, *
FROM [JnJ_Version1].[dbo].[td_Production_Week]
where RowID > 10000
I get error, RowID is an invalid column Name why? How to correct query 2.This is due to the logical evaluation order of a SELECT statement. Logically, a SELECT statement is computed in the order:
FROM (which includes JOIN)
WHERE
GROUP BY
HAVING
SELECT
ORDER BY
OFFSET
Thus, you can use what is defined in the SELECT list in the ORDER BY clause, but not in the WHERE clause.
In the case of row_number(), this has immediate repurcussions. row_number() is computed from the rows as they arrive the SELECT clause, and if you then you would filter on the value in the WHERE clause you would be going round in circles.
To do what you are looking for, you use a nested table, for instance with a CTE:
WITH numbering AS (
SELECT (ROW_NUMBER() over
(order by ImportId, ScenarioId, SiteID, AssetID, LocalSKUID, WEEKID, MonthID)) RowID, *
FROM [JnJ_Version1].[dbo].[td_Production_Week]
SELECT *
FROM numbering
WHERE RowID > 10000
Erland Sommarskog, SQL Server MVP, [email protected]
Maybe you are looking for
-
using System; using System.Collections.Generic; using System.Linq; using System.Web; using System.Web.UI; using System.Web.UI.WebControls; namespace Region_V_project_workshop publicpartialclassWebForm5: System.Web.UI.Page protectedvoidPage_Load(objec
-
HT204023 Troubleshooting speaker
Hello. I am having a problem with my built in speaker , I cannot clearly hear people ! Any advice
-
XML loader in custom Scrollpane
I'm working on my first website, and have mostly been using tutorials on Lynda.com which has been hugely helpful. I need several different scrollpanes in the site, one of which is a typical thumbnail gallery that uses XML to load the thumbnail image
-
Hi, I am doing HTTP to BAPI. In this one I am following the setps of TBIT - HTTP to BAPI scenario. Now when I compleated I am getting error <b> The requested resource does not exist..</b> ( MY sender service is correct and all parameters like host
-
Theirs a ? on the left side of my search box (Look in the pic) in all my finder windows, when i click it an error message comes up saying "This item could not be found" This is really bugging me, is there a way to get rid of it or should it do someth