Order confirmation after cost release

Hi,
Currently we have confirmed the order after cost release of that material,
Our requirement is that production order should not confirmed before cost release of that particular material.
Regards,
Devendra

Dear Devendra,
Check these threads,
Re: Blocking the conversion of Planned orders to Production orders before mate
Re: Process Order Creation without Standard Cost
Re: error msg if no standard cost present for Production order target cost
Regards
Mangalraj.S

Similar Messages

Restrict Confirmation without Cost Release

Hi,
How can we Restrict Confirmation without Cost Release???
Plz guide..
Moderator: Please, respect the rules, specify your questions and do not use SMS language

Dear Devendra,
Check these threads,
Re: Blocking the conversion of Planned orders to Production orders before mate
Re: Process Order Creation without Standard Cost
Re: error msg if no standard cost present for Production order target cost
Regards
Mangalraj.S

Recalling Process Order confirmations after selecting Last delivery indicator in error

Hello,
I was completing an order confirmation and hit the last delivery indicator. I submitted my confirmation but noticed I had not completed my amount. When I tried to pull the order back up,. I was not able to. Is there anyway to recall this order? I am new at my job and I'm just learning so I just went back through my notes and realized I was not suppose to use the "last delivery indicator". Any suggestions on how I can fix this or retrieve my order so that I can correc the amount and confirm the order would be very helpful.
Thank you in advance,
Rita

Hi Rita
If your question has been answered, please close this thread selecting the correct answer.
See this blog for more details:
How to close a discussion and why
BR
Caetano

Recosting material after cost release - Follow-up re MBEW/HKMAT field

When we set standards this year, I did not know that this field should have had its value set before costing, and it is now not showing the material number in variance calculations for the ten or so items that did not have the flag set.
My question is on fixing the issue. I know I have to re-cost to fix it so the mnaterial shows on variance calculations.
Do I have to do another costing run up through the release stage, or can I do a cost run and take it only through the "marking" phase?

Hi Michael,
when you speak of variance calculation I suppose you do that for production orders and want to see variances between target and actuals. In that case I fear setting the KKMAT field now will not help you for orders that were already created and have their actual costs posted. The target cost including the material origin might be recalculated, but the material origin of posted actual costs will stay empty, even if you set the flag now.
For production order variance analyis the flag will help you only for future orders. Whether you have to release the cost estimate depends on which version of variances you use. If you use the actuals against plan it uses the released standard costing, so you would have to release the new costing.
best regards,
Udo

Planned Order confirmation or cost collector setting?

Hello,
we have implemented the planned order backflushing on the corresponding reporting steps.
But on the ERP side its only sending material to the cost collector and not directly backflushing it againt the planned order.
On the SAP ME help page I saw this statement:
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_me52/helpdata/EN/4a/3ff0bf8e37420a9a96588eeb803de7/content.htm
Depending on the settings in SAPMEINT, the corresponding planned order is confirmed in SAP ERP or the cost collector is updated. Then the standard functions for confirmation are carried out in SAP ERP.
Where is this setting?
Regards,
Kai

Hi Santhosh,
Production Order planned costs are nothing but the order quantity will be calculated. But the product cost collector means the quantitative structure of the product means it will consider the all the components costs in the BOM contains and calculate the cost of the product OK.
I hope it helps you OK. Any queries ping me again OK.
Regards,
Madhu.G

Order confirmation after Subcon gr made

Dear guru
I am using external operation (subcon) as 0030th operation in order
previous operation 0020 i confirmed 1000 nos
and PO is made for 1000 nos Gr is done only for 500 nos form vendor side (balance 500 nos remaining in vendor processing)
now i am confirming operation 0030 in co11n if i clicked actual data tab it is showing 1000 nos but my client
need it show only 500 nos itis which qty GR has been made.
how i can control this in co11n, any user sxit i need to use for this. pl give the user exit.
thanks & regards
vinoth

Dear vinoth,
In Std SAp there is no link between Ur GR qty for Ex process for PO. U can do 30 confirmation without doing GR also. The yield qty which proposesin operation 30 is from confirmed yield of operation 20. While doing the Operation confirmation it will not check the stock. So user should be aware that. Usually GR and confirmation done by the same person.
To put control on this check with ur ABAPer, while confirming the operation, it should check with respect to the CTRL key PP02 it should go to Pur order GR table check qty with previous opeartion yield qty/purchase order qty, then give error or message. like this u need to give logic to ABAPer. This way it can be possible
sree

Work order confirmation after TECO

Hi Friends,
I have been facing a trickey situation where even Work order got TECO and i am triying to confirm the Operation (IW41) its allowing me to enter actual hours.however in work order those hours getting updated as actual Hrs aganist operation.
How its possible,in fact i should get error message.
can you please suggest.
Regards,
Srinika

It is standard behaviour. There are ways to restrict. See these 2 posts
User-Exit way
Stop Confirming TECOed PM Order: User-Exit Way
Status Profile way
PM Order - System Status and User Status Update
KJogeswaraRao

Ristrict Cancelling Process Order Confirmation (CORS) after FI MM period cl

Showing current date as posting date after Cancelling Process Order Confirm:
Issue with FICO and PP :-, after settlement (ko88) and all period end closing, system still allowed doing Cancelling Process Order Confirmation (CORS) and Showing current data as posting data
For example:
My order created on 30th September 2010 and order confirmed on the same day ie my posted date (30th September 2010)
I have done order reversal on 3rd October 2010 and posting date should be 3rd October 2010 but system showing current data as posting data. Can you please guide me why this unusual behavior happening

Hi Arun
Is this congif change will help me
          1)In BS22 first search for TECO.
           2)Double Click on TECO.
           3)New entry.
           4)Now search FI posting.
           5)Select status as Prohibited
My Requirement : Ristrict Cancelling Process Order Confirmation (CORS) after FI, MM period closed, and Materail Ledger done
I want to ristrict the (CORS) reversal of Process Order Confirmation after FI MM ML closed
right now as per standard its giving warning masage as " Posting with carent date YES or NO, if you say YES then system doing CORS on system carent date, i want to restrict it
Is above steps you refered will help me
please confirm
Regards
MKbinnal

Order confirmation output is triggering twice

Hi Gurus,
I am facing the issue with order confirmation.After saving the sales order system has giving two outputs for order. I have checked the ExtrasOutputItem the output type for order confirmation has displayed two times.I have checked NACE settings for the output type there it has not checked for Multiple messages.But still I am facing this issue.Please let me know how to rectify this error.
Regards,
Hari Challa.

Hi ,
Check how output is triggered manual or by scheduled job. Alos check settings in output determination procedure and check if any requirement is set.
Order confirmation can trigger when ever you make any changes in sales order and save so that the customer can get latest order confirmation.
Trust these inputs can help.
vivek

Posting related Error during Order Confirmation

Dear Experts,
I am from PP forum and had to post this in FI forum as i am getting an error message during process order confirmation after the goods posting is done thro backflush "Acct. 21701300 for trans./event key BSX, postable directly" .The error explanation says "the stock account determined automatically by the system is one that is directly postable. However, this stock posting can only be made to an automatically postable account. How to solve this please help.....
Regards,
Sunit

Hi
Stock account should be 'Post automatically only'. This option should be selected in the respective GL master in FS00.
Change the GL 21701300 to post automatically only in FS00 or assign a different stock account in config - OBYC - BSX for the respective material valuation class
Thank You,

No amendment after PO release

Hi
I have require the solution on Purchase order.
After final release there should be not modifed Quantity /Prices
What setting we required in customizing
Thanks

hi,
One solution is :
You can make the fields as a display fields For ME22N in the display mode...so that whenever you go to the change mode of the PO you will not be able to change it...
this can be done from :SPRO>> MM>> Purchasing >> PO >> Define screen layout>> Here choose from ME22N > ANd make the fields display....
Or
You can use the changability indicator in the release strategy, if you don't allow the changed PO for the release, then automatically, it will not affect the further process...
Hope it helps..
Regards
Priyanka.P

Target Cost in the settled process order become zero after cost deletion

Dear all,
User has standard cost estimates created in Jan 2010 that valid until the end of 2010 for every material in the system. user created a process order in April 2010. Target cost of the order was created based on the standard cost estimate and recipes as well as order qty. The order was also confirmed and settled in April 2010 without problem.
However, after I deleted all old costing estimates before I did a costing run for all materials in May 2010, the old order was resettled and all Target cost is removed from the order. I guess system try to look at April costing estimate but it is not there since it was deleted before I created the new costing estimate in May. Therefore, all varainces are throwed into remaining variances since the target cost become zero.
Other than mark the settled order for deletion or keep all old costing estimates, I am just wondering is anyway in the configuration to prevent the system to recaculate the target cost again for the settlement so I can avoid the problem happens?
Thanks.

Hi,
Target costs are only calculated after goods movements have occured on the order, the Target Costs are then calculated during the Variance calculation.
Target costs will only be calculated after the first goods receipt has been posted to the order. Also you have to ensure that the information to calculate target costs exists on the system in particular in OKV6.
This estimation is based on the customizing for the Target cost version in transaction OKV6 as in turn will the "real" calculation of the Target costs via the variance calculation.
So in OKV6 the Target cost will be based on preliminary costing on the order, an alternative cost estimate or the current standard cost estimate. Importantly if the choosen option is not fulfilled e.g. no current standard cost estimate, the target costs will not be predicted or calculated.
regards
Waman

PM Order Confirmation create actual posting in Cost Center, with CE type 43

Dear Expert,
I would like to know the business flow of Plant Maintenance that impacts cost center reporting.
During PM order confirmation, it will create an actual posting in Cost Center from Cost Center Reporting (No FI posting), say CC Operation, with Cost Element type: 43, which is attached with the activity type of Labor Cost assigned the the PM module.
Example: Cost Center: CC Operation, Cost Element: 840001 (CE type: 43), Amount: USD 100- (negative sign)
My Question:
How does this posting (currently is in controlling only) in cost center Operation with Cost Element type: 43 be reflected in my FI reporting?
Let say there is an FI posting of labor cost in CC Operation, amount USD 100, then from Cost Center Reporting, it actually offset both amounts, and this cost center become 0 in amount.
Kindly advise the concept of Plant Maintenance.
This seems like same with the concept of KB21N.
Thanks.

Hi Karthikeyan,
My issue and concern is similar to the issue raised as follows:
Secondary Cost Element Configuration for Plant Maintenance Order
http://scn.sap.com/thread/3488730
In this forum, it says that the posting in CO, during PM order confirmation is ...
+10 for Order and -10 for cost center A
After PM Order settlement:
-10 for Order and +10 for cost center A
From the cost center and PM Order CO report, they are 0 in value ...
Is this the correct way?
Thanks,
-Chin

Releasing credit sales order confirmation

Hi
We are using credit limit check. If the customer has credit issues, the sales order will get retained and the confirmation is lock. The issue is that after the released of the sales order the confirmation is not being unlock and the sales order is not taken into account by the filter of the backorder process.
Where should I verify that the sales order confirmation field is unlock at the moment of the credit release process?
Thanks a lot.

Two places you can check in the sales order, click on the document flow button on the top. Then click on status button, expand the header status. Here you can see the credit status. The other place is go to menu Goto -> Header ->status. Here you can see the credit status field carries relevant information.
Regards,

Product Costing - Process Order Confirmation

Dear Experts,
We are facing a situation with our Product Costing Scenario :
Under SFG Process Order Confirmation, there are Ten Phases to finally confirm the order. First Phase is for Raw Material Issuance. From Second Phase to Ninth Phase are relevant to Activity Types. Tenth Phase which is final phase, in this point Goods Receipt posting is generated.
At first phase, system posts Raw Materials Goods Issue (Movt Type 261) to Process Order:
Entry : RM (Cr), Consumption (Dr).
Client needs the system to post one more entry at the same time by : WIP (Dr), Inv Change (Cr).
Reason:
According to client, they have made consumption entry in finance but what if all raw materials are not consumed as yet and factory comes under fire, then how can they claim insurance on those Raw Materials which are not consumed and are still in the IN PROCESSING Stage?
My Answer was:
- They can find all material costs in Process Order as Debit Item.
- They can also calculate WIP but cannot post WIP in Finance unless the order is settled.
Ultimately, as per my knowledge client cannot check the unprocessed Raw Materials report in FI but they can check in CO. And this is the point of reservation from client.
They need an entry in Finance for WIP to claim insurance in case of fire and therefore they need a posting of WIP entry immediately after Goods Issue of Raw Materials to Order.
Can anyone please guide me further regarding this scenario and if any one can suggest any work around then it would be highly appreciated!
Regards,
Zain Bashir

Hi Zain
This is a very unusual question
Buddy, there is something in accounting called as "Going Concern Concept" which we all were taught in our accounting days.. That means when you do business, do it with a mindset that you are goinig to do it for long / for ever.. Accidents dont happen every day and you cant build a system around such things
Assume there is a fire (God forbid).. After the accident, you wont even know how much was lying there unconsumed which got gutted in the fire..
And insurances not just covers the stock lying consumed, but also stock manufactured and stock in the process of manufacturing (WIP)
And most importantly, dont expect SAP to throw up a figure at the click of a button.. Does your client really think that they will simply submit the report generated from SAP as-is to Insurance people?? SAP is just a technology enablement, which requires human intervention at various places
My opinion - Dont build system for such requirements
Br. Ajay M

Order confirmation after cost release

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for