OS sees disk as smaller than it is; did Secure Erase succeed?

I had to return a defective 4TB (2x2TB) RAID drive to the manufacturer.
It had been hooked up to a 27" iMac i7 with 10.6.x, but I attached it to my PowerMac G5 in order to do a Secure Erase (we were having brownouts in the area and I was less worried about leaving my old G5 on for the day+ needed).
I did the 1-pass secure erase. However, I noticed that the G5 (dual 2GHz running 10.5.8) reported the drive as being 3.6 TB; the iMac reported it as being the full 4TB.
So,
1) why the apparent difference in size?
2) more importantly, did all of the data (including Social Security numbers, credit card info, online banking/investing data, etc.) securely erase, or would this mean that some area of the drive might have been missed?

1000 * 1000 * 1000 * 1000 * 1000  = 1000000000000000
1024 * 1024 * 1024 * 1024  * 1024 = 1125899906842624
These terms are usually used in the world             of computing to describe disk space, or data storage space,             and system memory. For instance, just a few years ago we             were describing hard drive space using the term Megabytes.             Today, Gigabytes is the most common term being used to describe             the size of a hard drive. In the not so distant future,             Terabyte will be a common term. But what are they? This             is where it gets quite confusing because there are at least             three accepted definitions of each term.         
According to the IBM Dictionary of computing, when used             to describe disk storage capacity, a megabyte is 1,000,000             bytes in decimal notation. But when the term megabyte is used for                                     real and virtual storage, and channel volume, 2 to the 20th power or 1,048,576 bytes is the appropriate notation.                        According to the Microsoft Press             Computer Dictionary, a megabyte means either 1,000,000 bytes             or 1,048,576 bytes. According to Eric S. Raymond in The             New Hacker's Dictionary, a megabyte is always 1,048,576             bytes on the argument that bytes should naturally be computed             in powers of two. So which definition do most people conform             to?
When referring to a megabyte for disk storage,             the hard drive manufacturers use the standard that a megabyte             is 1,000,000 bytes. This means that when you buy an 80 Gigabyte             Hard drive you will get a total of 80,000,000,000 bytes             of available storage. This is where it gets confusing because             Windows uses the 1,048,576 byte rule so when you look at             the Windows drive properties an 80 Gigabyte drive will report             a capacity of 74.56 Gigabytes and a 250 Gigabyte drive will only yield 232 Gigabytes of  available storage space. Anybody confused yet? With             three accepted definitions, there will always be some confusion             so I will try to simplify the definitions a little.
The 1000 can be replaced with 1024 and still             be correct using the other acceptable standards. Both of these standards are correct depending on what type of storage you are referring.
http://www.whatsabyte.com/

Similar Messages

  • Disk Utility will not secure erase after 2015-002 security update

    HI
    I have a Mac Book Pro, May 2010, 2.4 ghz; 8gb ram; 500 gig hd (which I installed in Sept 2013), running Mac OS 10.9.5.  I am running Disk Utility Version 13. 
    I run secure erase, single, three and seven passes, several times a week, and regularly clean out cache files.  I have used about 228 gb; 271 gb are free.
    After installing Security Update 2015-002, I ran secure erase, single pass.  I got a failure message stating disk utility could not erase temporary file.  I ran secure ease, single pass, on the admin, everyday use and guest portions of my hard drive,  Same error message.
    Is a solution beyond doing a Time Machine backup, wipe the hard drive clean on a single pass, and reinstall?  Buy a new hard drive?  Thanks

    Do a backup, preferable 2 separate ones on 2 drives. Boot to the Recovery Volume (command - R on a restart or hold down the option/alt key during a restart and select Recovery Volume). Run Disk Utility Verify/Repair and Repair Permissions until you get no errors. Then re-install the OS.
    OS X Recovery
    OS X Recovery (2)

  • Physical disk IO size smaller than fragment block filesystem size ?

    Hello,
    in one default UFS filesystem we have 8K block size (bsize) and 1K fragmentsize (fsize). At this scenary I thought all "FileSytem IO" will be 8K (or greater) but never smaller than the fragment size (1K). If a UFS fragment/blocksize is allwasy several ADJACENTS sectors on disk (in a disk with sector=512B), all "physical disk IO" it will allways, like "Filesystem IO", greater than 1K.
    But with dtrace script from DTrace Toolkit (bitesize.d) I can see IO with 512B size.
    ¿What is wrong in my assumptions or what is the explanation?
    Thank you very much in advance!!

    rar wrote:
    Like Jim has indicated me in unix.com forum, That cross-post thread happens to be:
    http://www.unix.com/unix-advanced-expert-users/215823-physical-disk-io-size-smaller-than-fragment-block-filesystem-size.html
    You could have pasted the URL to be polite ...

  • "Hard drive is smaller than the one originally installed"

    Hi, 
    Recently, a coworker installed several viruses on his 9300 elite running Windows 7 x32. After trying several things and not being able to get rid of them, I ordered the recovery disks from HP. I ran the disks, and everything appeared to work fine until the recovery finished. The PC would restart, act like it was booting into windows (windows splash screen), then go to an HP screen that would say "HP is initializing software install" or something along those lines. It would sit for a minute then give me the error "an unrecoverable error has occurred. please contact system administrator. press enter to reboot".
    I thought it might be a problem with the disks, so I ordered replacement disks. Now, as soon as I put in the supplemental disk and click "next", I get the error "hard drive is smaller than one originally installed". No hard drive has ever been replaced on the PC that I know of. I'm not sure how to fix this.

    I just got this same message--did you ever get this resolved?

  • Causes of ORA-01200: actual file size of x is smaller than correct size n ?

    Hello everyone
    We are running Oracle 11.2.0.3 64-bit E/E on Oracle Linux 6.2 with UEK R2 on X64.
    Using Grid and ASM 11.2.0.3 and OMF names.
    The database files are alll on SAN, the SAN vendor name not disclosed here to protect the innocent/guilty 8^)
    I have a Test database MYDB (in NOARCHIVELOG mode) and after a normal server reboot, not a crash, the following error occured on Oracle database startup.
    srvctl start database -d MYDB
    PRCR-1079 : Failed to start resource ora.mydb.db
    CRS-5017: The resource action "ora.mydb.db start" encountered the following error:
    ORA-01122: database file 1 failed verification check
    ORA-01110: data file 1: '+ASMDATA/mydb/datafile/system.256.787848913' <<<<<<<<<<---------------------------------------------------- Corrupt file on ASM disk, system tablespace this time
    ORA-01200: actual file size of 94720 is smaller than correct size of 98560 blocks <<<<<<<<<<---------------------------------------------------- ERROR message
    The ASM disks are all up and disk groups are mounted OK. The ASM protection level is EXTERNAL.
    My understanding that the only proper recovery from the above error is to use RMAN Restore Database/File/Tablespace.etc (and then RMAN Recover, when in ArchiveLog mode).
    I do have RMAN disk backups, so I don't need to "patch" the database to recover.
    This is not my question at this point in time.
    My Question is this : what are the most likely causes of such error?
    Oracle Database bug? OS bug? Disk driver error? Server hardware failure (bus, memory, etc)? Or a SAN bug?
    I expect that Oracle 11g R2 will always come up with the database "clean" if the server reboots or if server crashes (i.e. due to complete power failure) provided the actual storage is not physically damaged.
    Our SAN vendor (no names!) says they are of the opinion that it's most likely Oracle database or Oracle Linux 6.x/UEK software bug, or probably Oracle ASM 11.2 bug.
    We have opened a support call with Oracle.....
    My personal experience dealing with similar database errors on more recent releases of Oracle (9i R2, 10g R2, 11g R2) and also MS-SQL 2005 and 2008 R2 suggests this kind of a problem is most likely related to errors/bugs in storage/drivers/firmware/BIOS and SAN and not likely to be a 'database' or O/S bug.
    Perhaps you, good people on this forum, can share their experiences, as unbiased as you can?
    Many thanks

    Ive seen Ora-1200 twice I think over the years, both times there was disk problems which led to write issues which caused file problems, youve reported no such issues on your side though so if thats actually true, Im thinking bug.

  • Problems with text in iWeb publishing much larger, or smaller than in iWeb (it is insane)!

    More than a year ago I had a problem with my iWeb not publishing correctly: links to other websites would not open in a separate window as designed in iWeb. I got help from an AppleCare techie and after he did a lot of tests, he concluded I had a corrupted Domain file (which became apparent after I upgraded to OS Snow Leopard).  I don't remember if I discussed with this techie another problem I had been having for as long as I had used iWeb, and that was "exploding" text: certain words, often italicized, would be huge, after publishing, relative to the surrounding text.  Sometimes certain words, or sentences would be smaller than designed in iWeb.  Through trial and error I would sort of solve these problems by enlarging text boxes, or making the offending word or phrase one text point smaller.  Sometimes deleting the text box entirely, and starting over would work.  And then there are the weird things that happen when my wife opens my website in Internet Explorer: things that make no sense and seem to be totally out of my control.
    So, I've spent a long time rebuilding my website in this supposedly uncorrupted Domain file, and today I finally finished and published to my hard drive, checked it out, and the "exploding" text is there with a vengeance.  So much so that I may just stick with my original ("corrupted") Domain file, the text problem on this new one seems even worse than the old one.  Anyone had this problem?  I meant to ask this question years ago, but got a bit lazy.
    Another question is: I've heard Apple is going to discontinue iWeb.  Despite my problems with the program, I rely on it.  What are the options going to be for iWeb users?

    Well you heard wrong didn't you!
    Apple is discontinuing MobileMe, which is the hosting in favour of iCloud services which will not contain any hosting.
    iWeb is an app and as far as we know you can still continue to use it - it will still work so carry on using it if you are happy with it.
    If you want to look at other alternatives to iWeb, then others suggest RapidWeaver and Sandvox as being closer to iWeb - both are available via the Mac App store.
    Also Freeway Express and Flux 3 are worth looking at - more design freedom and you are not restricted to templates as with RapidWeaver.

  • How do I play a Keynote 09v5.3 slideshow on my iMac at a size smaller than fullscreen?

    How do I play a Keynote09v5.3 slideshow on my iMac at a size smaller than fullscreen?

    Hi Gary
    Thanks for a conclusive answer.
    Regards
    Orchardhouse

  • For some reason all of my forwards, and my printing come out significantly smaller than the original. Any idea how to get this back to printing the size of my screen and forwarding the size of the original mail I've received? Thanks.

    Hi. I am not technically proficient. I have somehow hit something that is making my email forwards and text to the printer way smaller than what is appearing on my screen. I have looked into everything I can think of in settings and outlook express. If you have any ideas, I would greatly appreciate them. I assume that one click and I'll be back to "normal", but can't figure out which darned click that would be.  Thanks.

    Have you checked Outlook's font preferences?  You can change to size under General Preferences>Fonts.  You can also change font sizes by using ⌘shift+

  • Error in Schedule agreemenQuantity delivered smaller than quantity ordered.

    Dear Guru,
    I am facing the following error while deleting item from scheduling agreement (ME32L). Error is "Quantity delivered smaller than quantity ordered."
    Kindly help in this matter.
    Thanks in advance.
    Regards,
    Rajkumar

    Hi
    Check the scheduling agreement schedule line in ME38 you have already done goods receipt for this line item.
    Reverse the goods receipt if you wanna delete the line item in ME32L
    Hope it helps
    Thanks/Karthik

  • Hello, I have a Mac computer with NVIDIA 750M dedicated graphics card and monitor EIZO but the problem was there when I was working with Windows and Acer monitor. When I open a file from Camera Raw in PS this is smaller than the screen so I double-click w

    Hello, I have a Mac computer with NVIDIA 750M dedicated graphics card and monitor EIZO but the problem was there when I was working with Windows and Acer monitor. When I open a file from Camera Raw in PS this is smaller than the screen so I double-click with the tool "hand" to fit on the screen, but the picture loses sharpness and becomes blurry. If you magnify the image even only slightly with the tool "zoom" the picture comes back clear. In Camera Raw instead is always sharp. I solve the problem by turning off the graphics card in PS but often use plugin that need the graphics card otherwise the processing time is much longer. I ask for help.
    Thanks.

    Hello, I have a Mac computer with NVIDIA 750M dedicated graphics card and monitor EIZO but the problem was there when I was working with Windows and Acer monitor. When I open a file from Camera Raw in PS this is smaller than the screen so I double-click with the tool "hand" to fit on the screen, but the picture loses sharpness and becomes blurry. If you magnify the image even only slightly with the tool "zoom" the picture comes back clear. In Camera Raw instead is always sharp. I solve the problem by turning off the graphics card in PS but often use plugin that need the graphics card otherwise the processing time is much longer. I ask for help.
    Thanks.

  • Image in Photoshop looks smaller than in a viewer. Please help!!!

    When i view an image in PS CC in looks 2 times smaller than in Mac OS Preview or in any other viewer. I tried it on another computer - same thing. (Photoshop CC, 15 inch Macbook Pro with Retina display)
    Moreover, while the image looks sharp in photoshop, in viewer it looks like it's been magnified to 200%. So i create an image in photoshop say 300x300 pixels, 72 dpi, save it as jpeg, open in Preview at 100% and it looks twice as big as in photoshop and blury. if i post this image to the website, it looks exacly as in viewer, but not like in photoshop. Don't know what to do. Please help

    You do not understand some things.  Any image DPI resolution is meaningless when it comes to displays. Displays are normally run are their native resolution which is not 72DPI.  Retina displays are high resolution displays and many applications user interfaces were designed for display with low dpi resolution like 96DPI.  So their user interfaces will display very small on high resolution displays.  So Apple Mac  OS may have to scale up some application their User interface so the will display the same size as the would on a low resolution display to be useable. It is also possible that the Mac viewer may also scale up things so the look like the would on low resolution displays.  Photoshop would most likely display images on a retina display without scaling things up. So the would smaller and sharper in Photoshop.  It all about resolution.  A pixel has no size till there is a DPI association.  DPI defines pixel size for example 300 dpi with square aspect ratio would mean there are 9000 pixels per square inch each pixel would be 1/300"x1/300"  At 100DPI each square inch contain contain 1000 pixels each would be 1/100x1/100inch an image with 1200x1800pixels would print 4"x6" at 300dpi and would print 12" x 18" at 100DPI the 300dpi image is smaller and sharper then the 100DPI image.
    Web pages are normally design to fit on displays.  Displays have a limited number of pixels,  So web pages are design for the mythical standard display.  In the past displays all had low resolution and the number of pixel they had were typically 640x480, 800x600 then 1024x768 all had 4:3 aspect ratios. That changed some displays showed up with 5:4 aspect ratios then in 2001 IBM showed up with LCD  22.2" 9.2 MP 16:10 204dpi and 3860x2400pisels. The marketplace was not ready at that time. Even now the marketplace is not ready.  They are making 10" tablets these days with 2560x1600 pixels with a 300DPI resolution.   Web pages these days need versions for high resolution mobile devices like laptops and tablets as well as for desktops on old  devices. Other solutions are being worked on to dynamically alter web a page on servers and devices for the display the user is currently using.
    Bet you still do not know what to do but perhaps you understand what is going on.

  • I updated to 5.0 beta and the page on the screed is smaller than the previous version and I cant get the zoom to work to increase the text and pictures.

    the text and pictures is very small or at leat much smaller than in the prior version and the zoom will not make it bigger.

    Hi Idreier,
    I'd try starting Firefox in [[Safe Mode]]. If you don't have the issue while all of your add-ons, extensions, and themes are disabled, you can try adding them back in one by one until you find the culprit.
    Hopefully this helps!

  • Invoiced quantity is smaller than ordered quantity

    HI Everyone,
    When i'm doing archiving for the object MM_EKKO.The following message i got "Invoiced quantity is smaller than ordered quantity".
    Please can any one tell me how to close this type of purchase orders and continue archiving
    Regards
    subhash

    hi,
    It may be due to PO is still open for the given qty...
    Firstly check the PO price and qty..then check the IR price and qty it shd match...
    You can see the full history in the PO history tab in the PO item details...
    And then continue for the archiving...
    Hope it helps..
    Regards
    Priyanka.P

  • How to store images as disk files rather than in iphoto db

    Is there a way to make iPhoto maintain the images as disk files, rather than import them into iphotos massive database file. I would prefer to use iphoto to just store a link to the photo, rather than the photo itself. That way I can work with the image in photoshop or whatnot without having to jerk around with the iPhoto database/

    Welcome to the Apple Discussions. No need to find a workaround. You can use Photoshop from inside iPhoto.
    Using Photoshop (or Photoshop Elements) as Your Editor of Choice in iPhoto.
    1 - select Photoshop as your editor of choice in iPhoto's General Preference Section's under the "Edit photo:" menu.
    2 - double click on the thumbnail in iPhoto to open it in Photoshop. When you're finished editing click on the Save button. If you immediately get the JPEG Options window make your selection (Baseline standard seems to be the most compatible jpeg format) and click on the OK button. Your done.
    3 - however, if you get the navigation window that indicates that PS wants to save it as a PS formatted file. You'll need to either select JPEG from the menu and save (top image) or click on the desktop in the Navigation window (bottom image) and save it to the desktop for importing as a new photo.
    This method will let iPhoto know that the photo has been editied and will update the thumbnail file to reflect the edit..
    NOTE: With Photoshop Elements 6 the Saving File preferences should be configured: "On First Save: Save Over Current File". Also I suggest the Maximize PSD File Compatabilty be set to Always.
    If you want to use both iPhoto's editing mode and PS without having to go back and forth to the Preference pane, once you've selected PS as your editor of choice, reset the Preferences back to "Open in main window". That will let you either edit in iPhoto (double click on the thumbnail) or in PS (Control-click on the thumbnail and seledt "Edit in external editor" in the Contextual menu). This way you get the best of both worlds
    2 - double click on the thumbnail in iPhoto to open it in Photoshop. When you're finished editing click on the Save button. If you immediately get the JPEG Options window make your selection (Baseline standard seems to be the most compatible jpeg format) and click on the OK button. Your done.
    3 - however, if you get the navigation window that indicates that PS wants to save it as a PS formatted file. You'll need to either select JPEG from the menu and save (top image) or click on the desktop in the Navigation window (bottom image) and save it to the desktop for importing as a new photo.
    This method will let iPhoto know that the photo has been editied and will update the thumbnail file to reflect the edit..
    TIP: For insurance against the iPhoto database corruption that many users have experienced I recommend making a backup copy of the Library6.iPhoto (iPhoto.Library for iPhoto 5 and earlier) database file and keep it current. If problems crop up where iPhoto suddenly can't see any photos or thinks there are no photos in the library, replacing the working Library6.iPhoto file with the backup will often get the library back. By keeping it current I mean backup after each import and/or any serious editing or work on books, slideshows, calendars, cards, etc. That insures that if a problem pops up and you do need to replace the database file, you'll retain all those efforts. It doesn't take long to make the backup and it's good insurance.
    I've created an Automator workflow application (requires Tiger or later), iPhoto dB File Backup, that will copy the selected Library6.iPhoto file from your iPhoto Library folder to the Pictures folder, replacing any previous version of it. It's compatible with iPhoto 6 and 7 libraries and Tiger and Leopard. iPhoto does not have to be closed to run the application, just idle. You can download it at Toad's Cellar. Be sure to read the Read Me pdf file.≤br>
    Note: There now an Automator backup application for iPhoto 5 that will work with Tiger or Leopard.

  • The speaker of my brand new mac book pro are not working and I cannot plug in the earphones, the hole looks smaller than the pin or with an obstruction. anybody can help? thanks

    the speakers of my brand new mac book pro are not working and I cannot plug in the earphones, the hole looks smaller than the pin or with an obstruction. anybody can help? thanks

    Hi talero,
    Contact AppleCare or bring it into an Apple Store or AASP.

Maybe you are looking for

  • SSD Issues

    Hi all, Was very excited to get my new Mac Pro 6-core with a 512 SSD, but sadly getting a lot of problems. Freezing copying from CD to the SSD...has any one else had this problem? Also, say, installing itunes 10, and copying files in the background a

  • Dont know what to say......

    First time I use this method in my program int j starts with the value 0 but second time I use the method in the same program int j keeps on starting getting 1 and I just dont get why??      void findPosition2(Component k�[],int x,int y,Component c)

  • Balance sheet profit - is there a possibility to book it

    Hi experts, i hope my question is to understand. SAP is calculating the balance sheet profit in the year and at the first of the next year he makes a account brought forward   to profit brought forward. but he makes no posting, he is only calculating

  • Describe about CPU used in the technology of Blackberry?

    Describe about CPU used in the technology of Blackberry?

  • Integration Settings in Oracle Projects

    Dear All, We are looking to integrate Oracle 11i with Primavera, The problem is we couldn't find Integration Settings* option in the Oracle project super user responsiblity. Can anyone guide me how to enable this option. Thanks in advance.