OTN's search engine returns non-matching results

I plugged "agntsrvc.exe encountered a problem" into the web site's search engine. The returns were nonsensical, i.e., when I searched the returned documents for "agntsrvc" there were no matches. Basically, the site's search engine is useless.

Hi John,<br>
<br>
Fortunately google exist.<br>
Search libociei.so on forums.oracle.com with Google<br>
<br>
Nicolas.

Similar Messages

  • A php search engine that only shows results that match entire serch string

    I have set up a dreamweaver search engine through php and a fulltext search (WHERE MATCH (....) AGAINST (...). However, when someone inputs more than one word into the search form, the search engine churns out results that only have one of those words. How do I get it to only show results that have all the search string words inside? (or, at least, how do I get those results to show up at the top?)
    I have seen some advice (here) that uses php code to process the search query, divide up the words, and place a BOOLEAN '+' between each of the words. By doing this, the search engine will only show results that fully match all the terms.
    My problem is that I do not know how to put this code into my Dreamweaver-created code.
    My dreamweaver created code:
    <?php
    if (!function_exists("GetSQLValueString")) {
    function GetSQLValueString($theValue, $theType, $theDefinedValue = "", $theNotDefinedValue = "")
      if (PHP_VERSION < 6) {
        $theValue = get_magic_quotes_gpc() ? stripslashes($theValue) : $theValue;
      $theValue = function_exists("mysql_real_escape_string") ? mysql_real_escape_string($theValue) : mysql_escape_string($theValue);
      switch ($theType) {
        case "text":
          $theValue = ($theValue != "") ? "'" . $theValue . "'" : "NULL";
          break;   
        case "long":
        case "int":
          $theValue = ($theValue != "") ? intval($theValue) : "NULL";
          break;
        case "double":
          $theValue = ($theValue != "") ? doubleval($theValue) : "NULL";
          break;
        case "date":
          $theValue = ($theValue != "") ? "'" . $theValue . "'" : "NULL";
          break;
        case "defined":
          $theValue = ($theValue != "") ? $theDefinedValue : $theNotDefinedValue;
          break;
      return $theValue;
    $form_rsSearch = "-1";
    if (isset($_get['search'])) {
      $form_rsSearch = $_get['search'];
    mysql_select_db($database_dataConnect, $dataConnect);
    $query_rsSearch = sprintf("SELECT title, content FROM encyclopedia WHERE MATCH (title, content) AGAINST (%s)", GetSQLValueString($form_rsSearch, "text"));
    $rsSearch = mysql_query($query_rsSearch, $dataConnect) or die(mysql_error());
    $row_rsSearch = mysql_fetch_assoc($rsSearch);
    $totalRows_rsSearch = mysql_num_rows($rsSearch);
    $input_rsSearchResults = "-1";
    if (isset($_GET['search'])) {
      $input_rsSearchResults = $_GET['search'];
    mysql_select_db($database_EMdataConnect, $dataConnect);
    $query_rsSearchResults = sprintf("SELECT title, content FROM encyclopedia WHERE MATCH(title, content) AGAINST(%s)", GetSQLValueString($input_rsSearchResults, "text"));
    $rsSearchResults = mysql_query($query_rsSearchResults, $dataConnect) or die(mysql_error());
    $row_rsSearchResults = mysql_fetch_assoc($rsSearchResults);
    ?>
    and the code the website (link above) gives is:
    function search(String $search_string) {
         //strip Boolean search characters out of search string
         $search_string = string_replace($search_string,"+","");
         $search_string = string_replace($search_string,"-","");
         $search_string = string_replace($search_string,"*","");
         //split the search string up into an array of words
         Array $tokenized_search = split($search_string, " ");
         //init an empty final search string
         String $processed_search = "";
         //for each word in the search, wrap it
         //with an + and * character and then append
         //it to the processed_search variable
         foreach($tokenized_search as $token) {
              $processed_search+="+"+$token+"* ";
         //build the sql for the query and query the DB
         String $db_query = "select id, description
              from product_descriptions
              where MATCH(description)
              AGAINST ('"+$processed_search+"' IN BOOLEAN MODE)";
         Array results = execute_database_query($db_query);
         return results;
    If anyone can instruct me on the correct way to go about this, I would be very much obliged.
    Thank you,
    YWSW

    Don't use the Search bar, type the address in the Location bar.

  • Error saving map. Stored procedure returned non-zero result BizTalk Bug

    Hallo all
    MSDN is reporting this Bug.
    "Error saving map. Stored procedure returned non-zero result." error message when you deploy the BizTalk Server 2010 applications in BizTalk Server 2010 Administration Console"
    http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2673264/en-us
    I am having this problem in BizTalk 2013. Is this correct? or I am doing something wrong..
    This error occured as I was about to deploy BizTalk application from Visual studio 2012 to BizTalk 2013.
    If this bug is available in 2013, where can I get a fix for it..
    Thanks in Advance
    AKE

    Hi AKE,
    Fix for this bug in BizTalk Server 2013 is not publicly available yet. Only option to get the fix for this bug is to contact:
    http://support.microsoft.com/contactus/?ws=support
    If this answers your question please mark it accordingly. If this post is helpful, please vote as helpful.

  • Error saving map. Stored procedure returned non-zero result. Check if source and target schemas are present.

    I am using VS 2012 and BizTalk 2013 and attempting to deploy an application to BizTalk when I get these errors:
    Error 47
    at Microsoft.BizTalk.Deployment.Assembly.BtsMap.Save()
       at Microsoft.BizTalk.Deployment.Assembly.BtsArtifactCollection.Save()
       at Microsoft.BizTalk.Deployment.Assembly.BtsAssembly.Save(String applicationName)
       at Microsoft.BizTalk.Deployment.BizTalkAssembly.PrivateDeploy(String server, String database, String assemblyPathname, String applicationName)
       at Microsoft.BizTalk.Deployment.BizTalkAssembly.Deploy(Boolean redeploy, String server, String database, String assemblyPathname, String group, String applicationName, ApplicationLog log)
    0 0
    Error 49
    Failed to add resource(s). Change requests failed for some resources. BizTalkAssemblyResourceManager failed to complete end type change request. Failed to deploy map "XXX.BTS2013.XXX.Maps.map_XXXX_R01_InsLabProc".
    Error saving map. Stored procedure returned non-zero result. Check if source and target schemas are present. Error saving map. Stored procedure returned non-zero result. Check if source and target schemas are present.
    0 0
    Error 46
    Failed to deploy map "XXX.BTS2013.XXX.Maps.map_XXXX_R01_InsLabProc".
    Error saving map. Stored procedure returned non-zero result. Check if source and target schemas are present.
    0 0
    I also tried to Import a MSI file from our test environment to see if that would work...got the same errors.  After spending hours (not kidding) looking for an answer, all I could find is that a hotfix would work.  So, I got the hotfix from Microsoft
    Support and applied it then rebooted.  Still getting the same errors.  I'm absolutely at a stand still.  Interesting that I got this application to deploy yesterday and then the next time I deployed it I started getting these errors.  I'm
    ready to pull my hair out!
    Is there an answer for this out there somewhere?  Any help would be appreciated.
    Thanks,
    Dave

    Hi Dave,
    Which hotfix have you applied? I don't think a hotfix of this issue is available for BizTalk 2013 yet. You should create a
    support ticket with Microsoft to get a solution.
    If this answers your question please mark as answer. If this post is helpful, please vote as helpful by clicking the upward arrow mark next to my reply.

  • Looking for search engine-like word matching

    I wonder if there's any package that can do word matching along the lines of search engines.
    Let's say I have two ArrayLists of Strings:
    'keywords' containing the Strings to search: "one", "two" and "three"
    'match' containing the search criteria.
    If 'match' contained "one" then the method would return 'true'. If 'match' contained "seven", the method would return 'false'.
    Not really difficult, but the search engine syntax specifies the following:
    Keywords that begin with "+" are mandatory
    Keywords that begin with "-" must not be found
    Keywords without prefix may be found
    E.g. "+one", "+two" would return 'true', but "+one", "+four" would return 'false'. "+one", "four" would return 'true', since "four" doesn't have to be found. "+one", "+four" would return 'false', since "one" was found, but "four" was not. "-four" would return 'true', since "four" isn't part of the Strings to search. etc. etc. etc.
    Does anyone know where to find a package that does this?
    Regards,
    Eric

    Well, why write something if someone else has already done it? :-)
    As for the searching of "four": Keywords that have a "+" or no prefix must be matched, so it returns 'false'. So it only returns 'true' if the list contains "four".
    The whole point of the "+" is that if you have several keywords, the ones with "+" are mandatory, the ones without aren't.
    So "+one", "+two" means "one" AND "two", whereas "one", "two" means "one" OR "two".

  • Cut and paste on left click mouse doesn't work & manage search engine choices non-existtant

    I can no longer cut and paste from any website with the mouse. I have also lost the search engine choices (and the engine itself)
    == This happened ==
    Every time Firefox opened
    == new version of firefox was updated to 3.6.6

    Sounds like at least the Mouse is going out, open Sustem Preferences>Mouse, change the primary button to the right one, does the right button now work like he left one should?
    Just thinking, it could jast as likely be the KB, maybe the control key stuck? Does the Mouse work if you disconnect the KB?

  • There is no search engine and none can be added

    I just upgraded my FireFox to the latest version.
    I tried doing a search and there is no search engine and when I try to add one, nothing happens.
    Please help!

    You can check if you have the XML files of the default search engines including Google in the browser\searchplugins folder in the Firefox program folder.
    If not then you need to reinstall Firefox.
    Try to delete the search.json file and possible search-metadata.json and search.sqlite files in the Firefox profile folder to reset the search engines to the default.
    *http://kb.mozillazine.org/Profile_folder_-_Firefox
    Firefox will rebuild the search.json file from the default search engines in the "browser\searchplugins" folder in the Firefox program and the searchplugins folder in the Firefox profile folder.
    You can use this button to go to the currently used Firefox profile folder:
    *Help > Troubleshooting Information > Profile Directory: Show Folder (Linux: Open Directory; Mac: Show in Finder)
    *http://kb.mozillazine.org/Profile_folder_-_Firefox

  • Search not returning all 10 results per page

    Anyone seen this?
    When i do a search, i don't get all 10 per page...
    "Results from your search: 1055. Showing: 1-7."
    however, when i hit 'next'
    "Results from your search: 1055. Showing: 11-16."
    why aren't i seeing 8, 9 17, 18, 19....etc?
    6.1 portal

    out of the box.
    i'm hoping to dodge this issue because i'm upgrading to a new environment in a few weeks hopefully where the search index is rebuilt.

  • New Website Search Engine Results

    I have an overly-simplified, single-page website, ourhealthcarecrisis.com and my client wants the text formatted in a way I'm not currently able to provide, mainly because I'm still new to website creation. In order to provide the appearance of his text, I've used a screen capture of the MS Word document he wants me to duplicate. It's not pretty, at least to me, but the appearance pleases the client.
    Here's the problem: when he types the name of his website, ourhealthcarecrisis (minus the .com), into Google he doesn't see the results he wants. The only text that comes up, "create the FHIA," is from a previously-uploaded version of the site. I don't know how to "update" the information with Google and it frustrates him that I can't accomplish what he wants.
    I know the search engines look for internal text in addition to keywords and meta tags, but for the moment I'm at a loss for options. I understand that formatting the text itself is what should really be done, but at the moment I can't provide it.
    Any suggestion will be greatly appreciated.
    Thanks.

    I 100% agree that the best choice would be to do the site in HTML...
    but I've also had a client that insisted on an image being used instead of recreating the graphics, etc in HTML...sometimes complex images and text font can be difficult to reproduce in plain HTML.
    So to the other excellant posters, SnakEyez02, RikRamsay14, and John Waller, I'd like to offer an option that could perhaps provide a happy medium.... use FLASH to represent the image you now have.
    WHOA... now before everyone comes crashing down on me... a long time Flash developer... let me explain.
    In the same way that there are "Best Practices" for developing an HTML Web site... there are also "Best Practices" for adding Flash to a Web site...(and remember, there is really no such thing as a Flash Web site... only HTML, ASP, PHP Web sites with some Flash content).
    Those "Best Practices" (at least in my mind) include using swfobject to add alternate content and navigation for non-Flash browsers.
    So as a regular part of adding Flash to a Web site, you would also need to include non-Flash navigation and content... that's just part of using Flash on a Web site... NOT something extra.
    The alt content can be any content you can imagine.. for example:
    Links, images, lists, etc...
    Full text narration for a Flash video..
    Detailed text description matching the text in the image PLUS a detailed description of the graphic elements on the page (NOT picked up in regular HTML)..
    Alternate video format...
    the list goes on.
    For review:
    If you think that Flash is somehow bad for SEO, it's time to dispell that MYTH!
    If fact, in some circumstances I'll use Flash INSTEAD of just HTML because then I'll have better SEO than with just HTML alone.
    http://www.worldbarefootcenter.com/
    The link to World Barefoot Center in the above post is just one example. View the source code and you see a couple paragraphs of text along with regular HTML links.... but what displays is the Flash version of the image and Flash links.
    The client provided the artwork for the page... and that's what they wanted to use a .jpg image. Well yes, that could be done in HTML but it would be virtually invisible to Google. So Instead I converted the image into a Flash .swf and used swfobject to display the Flash. swfobject allows you to create alternate content inside the <div> which also holds the Flash .swf, then when the page is loaded it detects if the browser has the Flash pluggin. If it does, it displays just the Flash content, if not, it displays the alternate content. Since almost everyone has the Flash pluggin, for most people the Flash version of the <div> will display.
    The alternate content for that <div> can be any regular HTML text, images, media player, links, etc., anything that you would use if you were not using the Flash. Now the best part is that the alternate content can be "over the top" as far as optimizing for SEO, since it will not be seen by most viewers.
    Here's another example of SEO with Flash.. again, the page is just a single image provided by the client:
    http://www.ksowetsuits.com/
    View the source code. The alt content is paragraph after paragraph of information about the site, including lists and links. If it was just the HTML, it might be kind of a boring Home page. But for SEO I can go "over the top" in promoting the site, since most viewers will never see that part... but it's all indexed by search engines. The end result is BETTER SEO using Flash than just HTML.
    On another Web site, a Flash video is displayed, the alt content is the complete text narration of the video. Now how many people would take the time to read that if they could just watch the video instead?? again, better SEO with Flash than without. In fact in one case we had first page search result from that video narration within 4 hours of posting the page.
    On still another site with a Flash video, the alt content is another video, but a .mov version, which will, in effect play Flash video on the iPhone (not possible you say??). Well since the iPhone does not have Flash pluggin, it simply displays the .mov version of the video, while everyione else sees the Flash version.
    So anyway, if Flash is a part of your Web development, you should look into using swfobject and alternate content.
    http://code.google.com/p/swfobject/
    Best wishes,
    Eye for Video
    www.cidigitalmedia.com
    Best wishes all!
    Adninjastator

  • Search Engine Toolbar inactive - will not search when enter pressed

    I recently upgrade to Firefox 5 from Firefox 3.6. The Search toolbar worked great in 3.6 but now in 5 when I type into the search engine I get suggested results but when I hit "enter" to perform the search nothing happens. I tried to switch different search engines but get the same problem. Any ideas?

    There are compatibility issues between Firefox and Ask. See http://kb.mozillazine.org/Problematic_extensions

  • Making Flash Content Visible to Search Engines

    When I was using Flash CS4, it published a HTML file that showed the text content of the movie, which made it easy for search engines to index the site. However, in Flash CS5.5, I notice it doesn't appear to do that anymore.
    What do I do (step-by-step) to make my movie content visible to search engines?
    Thanks!!

    Create all the text content in HTML first.... then use swfobject for Flash detection to display the Flash if the visitor has Flash, regular HTML text if not.
    http://code.google.com/p/swfobject/
    For reiew:
    If you think that Flash is somehow bad for SEO, it's time to dispell that MYTH!
    If fact, in some circumstances I'll use Flash INSTEAD of just HTML because then I'll have better SEO than with just HTML alone.
    http://www.worldbarefootcenter.com/
    The link to World Barefoot Center in the above post is just one example. View the source code and you see a couple paragraphs of text along with regular HTML links.... but what displays is the Flash version of the image and Flash links.
    The client provided the artwork for the page... and that's what they wanted to use a .jpg image. Well yes, that could be done in HTML but it would be virtually invisible to Google. So Instead I converted the image into a Flash .swf and used swfobject to display the Flash. swfobject allows you to create alternate content inside the <div> which also holds the Flash .swf, then when the page is loaded it detects if the browser has the Flash pluggin. If it does, it displays just the Flash content, if not, it displays the alternate content. Since almost everyone has the Flash pluggin, for most people the Flash version of the <div> will display.
    The alternate content for that <div> can be any regular HTML text, images, media player, links, etc., anything that you would use if you were not using the Flash. Now the best part is that the alternate content can be "over the top" as far as optimizing for SEO, since it will not be seen by most viewers.
    Here's another example of SEO with Flash.. again, the page is just a single image provided by the client:
    http://www.ksowetsuits.com/
    View the source code. The alt content is paragraph after paragraph of information about the site, including lists and links. If it was just the HTML, it might be kind of a boring Home page. But for SEO I can go "over the top" in promoting the site, since most viewers will never see that part... but it's all indexed by search engines. The end result is BETTER SEO using Flash than just HTML.
    On another Web site, a Flash video is displayed, the alt content is the complete text narration of the video. Now how many people would take the time to read that if they could just watch the video instead?? again, better SEO with Flash than without. In fact in one case we had first page search result from that video narration within 4 hours of posting the page.
    On still another site with a Flash video, the alt content is another video, but a .mov version, which will, in effect play Flash video on the iPhone (not possible you say??). Well since the iPhone does not have Flash pluggin, it simply displays the .mov version of the video, while everyione else sees the Flash version.
    So anyway, if Flash is a part of your Web development, you should look into using swfobject and alternate content.
    http://code.google.com/p/swfobject/
    Best wishes,
    Eye for Video
    www.cidigitalmedia.com
    Best wishes,
    Adninjastrator

  • Saving search engines results

    hello ,
    I have desgined a user interface using jsp and servlet that reformulate the query and send it to the search engine. I have a question how to save those results in a text file for further processing.
    thanks
    Edited by: [email protected] on Nov 8, 2007 2:51 PM

    web server provides the infra structure to search and return the query in HTML format. you can use some tools on top of web server to parse the HTML results

  • Why does firefox 4 freeze on the 1st result page of google search engine

    I updated to Firefox 4 yesterday and now every time I use the google search engine my screen freezes on the first results page and will not allow me to click on any of the links on it, saying that it is not responding before eventually the screen goes white.
    I tried to find a solution on the Firefox Support page but the only solution relates to McAfee Site Advisor. As I do not have this installed and never have I was wondering if it would be possible for you to tell me how do I fix it?
    Thank you.

    Hi, i had the same problem, and I also use Bullguard, I contacted them, just received answer, (in about 20 min). It is incompatibility of FF4 and bullguard (they know about it, and fix will be released soon), and probably most of the other antiviruses, as I see this is very popular problem. The solution though is very simple : in firefox disable addon "Bullguard Safe Browsing". It works. Or alternatively open bullguard go : antivirus - settings - safe browsing (unchek that). For those not using bullguard i would recommend to check their addons in FF and if there is any from your antivirus try to disable it for now.

  • Windows 8.1 PC, using reader, when searching a folder containing approx 100 doc's. If i search for a word, no results are returned. only the doc names can be found but nothing from within the doc. This is a new problem and was not the case before.

    Windows 8.1 PC, using reader, when searching a folder containing approx 100 doc's. If i search for a word, no results are returned. only the doc names can be found but nothing from within the doc.
    This is a new problem and was not the case before.

    Works perfectly fine for me with the latest Reader version (11.0.09).
    You write that it worked "before"; before what?  An update?  Update from what version to what version?

  • RE: Firefox search box - manage search engines - get more search engines.. IT DOESN'T WORK , I now get 1000's of useless irrelevant results, PLEASE FIX THE SITES SEARCH NOW, IT'S COMPLETELY USELESS NOW

    RE: Firefox search box -> manage search engines -> get more search engines..
    IT DOESN'T WORK
    I just want to add youtube + some others to the list of sites in the Firefox search box, I now get 1000's of useless irrelevant results, PLEASE FIX THE SITES SEARCH NOW, IT'S COMPLETELY USELESS NOW

    Hi Kvoter,
    What are you hoping for, firefox to display lists of sites you have visited or bookmarked ?
    *''' it should be able to do that'''
    * my firefox does that
    I am only a fellow ordinary user of Firefox & XP, but maybe the problem is on your machine, rather than needing a fix from firefox. If you take a little time to read this you may be able to sort out the problems yourself.
    I hope you do not mind me covering a few basics:
    * the [[Search bar]] { <-- clickable link -- ] is designed to produce a lot or results, whereas
    *the [[Location bar search|Location Bar]] is a lot more specific and may be [[Location bar autocomplete#w_controlling-behavior|set]] to include or exclude History & or [[bookmarks]]
    If you are getting literally 1000s of totally unrelated results you may need to consider [[Is my Firefox problem a result of malware]]
    Hope to hear that you have solved the problem, or a bit more detail about what still is a problem.
    John

Maybe you are looking for