Over Saturated Photos in IDVD09

Using Iphoto 09 and IDVD09. Trying to burn a slideshow with 2 small video clips via Imovie09 to IDVD. The photos are extremely over saturated. Skin is a sharp pink or red color. Totally unusable. Any suggestions to correct this? Can't believe this is happening, very frustrated. All help appreciated, I can not be the first with this problem.

What does it take to get someone from APPLE to answer a question here.
I'm sorry, but that isn't the purpose of these forums.
You can tell Apple about your product concerns at http://www.apple.com/feedback/ and select your product from those shown. Don't expect an answer - although it has been know to happen
If you have an Apple Store near you, you can set up a Genius Bar appointment via: http://www.apple.com/retail/geniusbar/
If your equipment is still under AppleCare, you can call in the U.S. for iPod, Mac and iPad technical support: 1-800-APL-CARE (1-800-275-2273)

Similar Messages

  • Photos edited in Zoombrowser/Digital Photo Professional become over-saturated

    Hi,
    I'm new to using Zoombrowser and having an issue with over-saturated photos.
    I edited a photo in ZB and while in the software the photo looks like the way I took it. 
    But when I export the photo, it comes out more saturated even though I didn't make any changes. 
    This has happened to other photos also, so it can't be a one-time accident..
    I've read online that this might be an issue with "color-space" but I don't know how to change it.
    I've been using sRGB on the Camera and ZB...what else should I check?
    Also, this happens with Digital Photo Professional also.
    Thanks.
    Raj.

    Hi,
    Yes, I am using different viewers...in ZoomBrowser/DPP the photo looks ok...in Windows Viewer/Facebook the photo comes out over-saturated.
    I thought it might be an issue with the different viewers...but when I was using Lightroom to edit, there wasn't this much of a difference...so I thought I'd ask.
    I don't see a difference when I export from DPP and bring it back up on DPP.  But, I'd like to be sure the exported photo will look (for the most part) the way it looked before I export...at least on my computer.
    Any chance I need to calibrate my monitor or play around with settings in ZoomBrowser/DPP?
    Thanks for your questions and suggestions.
    Raj

  • Photo's look over saturated when compaired with Preview and PS.

    My g/f's photos look natural when she views them in Preview and Photoshop, yet when viewed within iPhoto they look over saturated!
    Which one represents the truest viewer and why are they different?
    Thanx
    Tc

    Can I just say...
    I ask anyone with Tiger and 6.0.3 to double click a photo from within iPhoto so it goes to edit within Photoshop. As soon as the photo arrives at PS it looks fine and as it should be. Compare the two and iPhoto's is aweful!!
    Seriously, dont edit anything in iPhoto. The colour profiling is all over the place!
    Tc

  • My photos look over saturated when opened in CS6

    When i look at my photos in Ulead Instant Viewer or Breeze Browser Pro they look similar to what they did on the back of my camera.
    But when i view them in my newly purchased CS6 the saturation is increased by around 25 to 30 units.
    When i scanned some 35mm colour negatives and viewed them in photoshop they had exactly the same saturation as when viewed in Ulead Instant Viewer and Breeze Browser Pro.
    Can anyone help please?

    CS6 the saturation is increased by around 25 to 30 units.
    if Photoshop is not displaying your RGB faithfully, either your monitor profile is off or Photoshop is being configured to use (or assume) the wrong soure profile (it is possible your problem documents are over saturated and Photoshop is only displaying the problem)
    i would have you download the PDI WhackedRGB.jpg and see what happens in your apps...
    tip: if you confirm Photoshop is indeed using the whacked source profile, and it is not displaying proper, I would suspect your monitor profile (try Edit>Color Settings> Settings> North American Prepress 2 for now - then quit Photoshop and reopen the Whacked test image, "Use the embedded profile")...

  • Pixma Pro9000 - over saturation of photo ink.

    I have been using this model for some time in my studio for last minute photographs - LOVE it!  It broke, had error message that was unresolvable without sending it in.  So I purchased another of the same printer, used.  After I plugged it in, using same drivers, I ran through the maintenance tasks - they were all acceptable and as expected.  Color good, printed a test sheet - it came out great.  I put in some photo paper, semi-gloss, and printed a color photograph that I have printed before - oh wow!  Way too much green and very wet, over-saturation.  So I tried a black/white photograph - and still oversaturated and green!  So I removed all the ink cartridges (all full!), and replaced with new ones - better, but still over-saturation.  I uninstalled all drivers/software and reinstalled from the Canon website drivers for my Windows 7 (64-bit).  Better, but still over-saturation!  Colors in the wrong places, etc.  I have been without this printer for a few months, and really need help to get this one going again.  I am considering uninstalling it all again, and finding my original disks and doing that installation.  I appreciate any help I can get!  I do like having this particular printer, and the quality it puts out.

    Two things come to mind in this situation.  One are you using new Canon brand cartridges?  And are you using Canon brand paper with the correct ICC profile?
    If not you must do this first.  After you get everything working correctly, you can try other paper that has a profile for Canon printers.  Red River papers are very good.  Some others are not and will not work.
    On cartridges NEVER use off-brand.  Always use genuine Canon from a reputable store.
    EOS 1Ds Mk III, EOS 1D Mk IV EF 50mm f1.2 L, EF 24-70mm f2.8 L,
    EF 70-200mm f2.8 L IS II, Sigma 120-300mm f2.8 EX APO
    Photoshop CS6, ACR 9, Lightroom 6

  • Over saturated images when monitor resumes from sleep

    Lately I started to get this weird beheviour from LR 2.7. each time my monitor resumes from sleep all image colors become extremely over saturated. All other apps and computer desktop are just the same so it's only LR.
    I use a wide gamut LCD (HP LP2475w) which is calibrated using iOne Display 2.
    If I restart LR the problem goes away. This only started a few days ago just after I started uploading new photos taken by a new lens (Sigma 30mm).
    Any ideas?
    Micha

    Hi
    I can sympathise with how annoying this must be - and although I haven't looked into it myself, I do recall several other posts over the last 18months or so, with the same issue.
    I can't dig out the exact posts now, but maybe the following might lead somewhere?
    http://webkit.org/blog/73/color-spaces/
    http://docs.info.apple.com/article.html?artnum=302827
    http://www.gballard.net/psd/golive_pageprofile/embeddedJPEGprofiles.html
    sorry I can't locate the threads I remember- I found one or two, but they were un-answered.

  • Deskjet 1010 over saturated colors

    This is my first HP printer. I have had it only a few days and am very disappointed with prints from my photographs.
    The prints have over saturated colors and are too warm, resulting in a dark, muddy appearance.
    For mant years, I have used Canon printers that have allowed me to adjust color balance and density.
    I was surprised to that these facilities are not available with HP software.
    Is there any way I can get the print quality that I want?

    HI , Welcome to the HP Support Forums! I see that you're experiencing quality issues, while printing photos on your HP Deskjet 1010 Printer. I would like to assist you with this. Due to the nature of the issue, I may require more information. What operating system are you using? How to Find the Windows Edition and Version on Your Computer.What operating system are you using? Mac OS X: How Do I Find Which Mac OS X Version Is on My Computer? To see if the correct driver is installed please try: Please download and run the Print and Scan Doctor, it will likely diagnose and resolve the issue you are experiencing. Please let me know the results of the steps I have recommended.        Note: The Print and Scan Doctor is for Windows Operating Systems. Do colour prints look good on regular paper? 
    What type of paper are you using when you're printing photos?  Did you specify the Paper Type when printing, in the print settings?        Note: If you aren't using HP Photo Paper, select Other Photo Paper. The printer is programmed to know HP Paper, the speed and saturation of the Ink will depend on the type of paper you're using. Therefore, if you're using none HP Paper, and the print settings are set for HP Photo Paper, you will see these results. Printing Photos- Manual Load photo paper1. Make sure the output tray is open.2. IMPORTANT: Remove all paper from the paper input tray, and then load the photo paper with side to be printed on facing up.  To print a photo on photo paper1. On the File menu in your software, click Print.2.Make sure your printer is selected.3. Click the button that opens the Properties dialog box. Depending on your software application, this button might be called Properties, Options, Printer Setup, Printer Properties, Printer, or Preferences.4. Select the appropriate options.● On the Layout tab, select Portrait or Landscape orientation.● On the Paper/Quality tab, select the appropriate paper type and print quality from the Media drop-down list.● Click Advanced to select the appropriate paper size from the Paper Size drop-down list.         NOTE: For maximum dpi resolution, go to the Paper/Quality tab and select Photo Paper,Best Quality from the Media drop-down list. Then go to the Advanced tab and select Yes from the Print in Max DPI drop-down list. If you want to print Max DPI in grayscale, select High Quality Grayscale from the Print in Grayscale drop-down list.5. Click OK to return to the Properties dialog box.6. Click OK, and then click Print or OK in the Print dialog box.     NOTE: After the printing is finished, remove unused photo paper from the input tray. Store the photo paper so it does not start to curl, which could reduce the quality of your printout I would try the steps within this guide, Fixing Print Quality Problems. If you need further assistance, please let me know the following information above. Please respond to this post with the result of your troubleshooting. I look forward to hearing from you. Good Luck!

  • LR3: Exports are dark and over-saturated

    ... or: LR3 shows everything dull and to light...
    I've upload an image and described my problem her:
    http://www.flickr.com/photos/tcdk/4753052290/
    But here it is:
    I'm having some color and curve problems with my exports, it all looks to dark and to saturated when I export from Lightroom 3. So I'm trying to figure out what's happening.
    Here's the setup:
    Windows XP
    Nvidia 8600GT graphics card
    One Dell 2407WFPHC screen
    One Dell 2408WFP screen (my main)
    Huey Pro color calibration kit (software version 1.51)
    Everything calibrated. It looks good to me when I import in lightroom (from raw from Pentax K20D, and Panasonic LX3)
    Exporting to jpeg (sRGB) or tiff and viewing in anything else the colors are darker and over-saturated (tried in firefox (profile aware), Internet Explorer, irfanview and chrome). Loading the jpeg into Lightroom and comparing it to the RAW, they look the same (not dark or over-saturated).
    What you see above is a screen grab, of a test chart viewed in Lightroom and IrfanView. They where just imported/loaded - nothing was done. No development settings are applied as part of my LR3 import.
    The colors in lightroom 3 are dull compared to the IrfanView.
    Sample rgb values:
    1 red:
    Lightroom 224,52,27 (not that pure)
    Irfanview 254,0,0 (~pure red)
    4 purple:
    Lightroom: 124,1,251
    irfanview:  131,0,254
    9 green:
    lightroom: 126,255,54 (far from pure green)
    irfanview: 0,255,3 (pure green)
    The red and the green are the worst - a lot more "energy" in them. So imagine the reverse process. I've a photo in Lightroom and it looks good to me. I export it and every 126,255,54 gets made into pure green. Darker and over-saturated!
    I've no idea what's happning or what to do about it. I've tried everything I can think about.
    I don't really think I had this issue with LR2 - not enough to notice anyway.
    System info:
    Lightroom version: 3.0 [677000]
    Operating system: Microsoft Windows XP Professional Service Pack 3 (Build 2600)
    Version: 5.1 [2600]
    Application architecture: x86
    System architecture: x86
    Physical processor count: 2
    Processor speed: 1,8 GHz
    Built-in memory: 3007,1 MB
    Real memory available to Lightroom: 716,8 MB
    Real memory used by Lightroom: 278,4 MB (38,8%)
    Virtual memory used by Lightroom: 266,7 MB
    Memory cache size: 49,7 MB
    System DPI setting: 96 DPI
    Displays: 1) 1200x1920, 2) 1920x1200
    Application folder: C:\Program Files\Adobe\Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 3
    Library Path: P:\Lightroom\Lightroom 3 Catalog\Lightroom 3 Catalog\Lightroom 3 Catalog.lrcat
    Settings Folder: C:\Documents and Settings\Thomas Christensen\Application Data\Adobe\Lightroom

    So in my case it seems I'm better off running uncalibrated as that seems to produce something more natural across the board than when I use calibration and it goes between extremes, fine or totally wrong... I can see the images fine on my controlled environment but if you're distributing online then things don't work out at all!
    This is a very common misconception. Needless to say it is wrong. the only way you can get reasonable colors on everybody else's monitors is to calibrate your display and only trust color managed apps. If you don't calibrate and don't use color managed apps, your output will basically be completely random. At least with calibration and management you will be targeting the standard (sRGB) that most monitors cluster around (that's what they were designed to), so while individual monitors will be more or less random, on average they will show what you intended. If you don't calibrate and manage you will target only your specific monitor. Since this is a wide gamut display, the average viewer (who doesn't calibrate nor color manage) will see a dull desaturated image with respect to what you see.
    Bottom line: If you use a wide gamut monitor, calibrate and only trust color managed apps. If you have a normal gamut monitor, calibrate and trust color managed apps the most, but non managed apps will be OK if you use sRGB as your export space. You cannot do away with the calibration step if you care about what others will see.

  • Images in video become over saturated when exported

    When I export the project as an AVI the images in the video become over saturated, ie the skin tone of people becomes bright orange in some cases. Is there a setting to prevent this happening?

    andrew
    Grand ideas or major duds...let us try the two different tests to see if we can pin point where the issue originates and its cause....
    You may want to work from a copy of the problematic project....See File Menu/Save A Copy)
    Open your existing project (the one that is yielding your DV AVI 4:3 @ 29.97 interlaced frames per second, and displaying with color issues).
    But, do not export this project's Timeline using Publish+Share/Computer/AVI with Presets = DV NTSC Standard as you have been doing, assumed
    with no export settings customization under the Advanced Button of the preset.
    1. Go to Expert workspace File Menu/Project Archiver and its Archive and Copy options. Project Archive the project with the Copy option. This will result in a "Copied....Folder" saved to the computer hard at the location that you designated. Open the "Copied....Folder" to see copies of the source media that went into the project. These copies will represent all the source media that went into Project Assets whether they were used on the Timeline or not. Open each to determine if there is any color issues with any.
    on to second test....
    2. Go to Timeline Menu and select and click on Delete Rendered Files to do just that. Next, render the Timeline content by pressing the Enter key of the computer main keyboard. All video previews generated from Timeline rendering of a SD project are DV AVI files, be the files being previewed photos or videos.
    Next, go to the Adobe Premiere Elements Preview Files Folder (by default in Windows' Document/Adobe/Premiere Elements/12.0) and open that folder. Play back the preview files there to determine if they have color flaws.
    Please let us know the outcome.
    Thanks.
    ATR

  • Over-Saturation

    I was told by a couple of pro photographers on a web site I frequent that my photos are generally over-saturated.  I have PSE 10 and almost always make the following edits:
    - using the Quick selection, do an Autofix, then increase the Shadows, Highlights, and Midtones to bring out more definition
    - using Full, do an Auto Levels, sometimes do an Auto Color Correction (depending on how it looks), and finally do a bit of sharpening using the Unsharp Mask
    Rarely do I specifically adjust (increase) the saturation.  So my questions are:
    1) I think I have a general idea of when photos are over-saturated, but what specifically do you look for to indicate that they are?
    2) do any of the PSE edits I am doing above implicitly change the saturation?  If so, how can I modify my edits so as not to over-saturate?
    3) can you take a look at some of my photos and give me your opinion as to whether they are over-saturated?  The first photo of the butterfly in the photostream was specifically adjusted for saturation, but most of the other ones were not.
    http://www.flickr.com/photos/98772145@N05/
    Thanks.

    I see the same thing if I edit the example fox image in the same ways as you've specified, although this particular image doesn't need much done to it, in my opinion, and so the oversaturation is less than some others.
    I think you are on the right track saying out of the Quick Fix things, because these reduce the overall dynamic range more than a little and boost the saturation slightly so the net effect is an unnatural mismatch between the overall contrast and the saturation.  Normally if you reduce contrast in a scene the colors are also muted but with your multiple iterations of fixes the opposite occurs.
    The other comment is that the sharpness is being applied to things that don't deserve it, mainly noise, and the way you reduce this is to up the threshold a bit to avoid sharpening areas that don't have edges.  I found that on the fox picture, a threshold around 15 seemed good, which sharpens the glint in the eyes and some of the fur that is in focus, but leaves the out-of-focus noisy areas alone.
    You asked what you might do different, and I have two approaches to give, none of which use Quick or Auto fixes and actually take less steps.  First is to use Levels and Shadows/Highlights which are both under Enhance / Adjust Lighting.  The third option in this menu is Brightness/Contrast but the fox picture was almost ok so didn't really need any of that.  Here are screen shots of the menu items and the adjustments I made to your photo using them:
    First I used Levels to adjust the black point to 12 which was where the histogram ran out of values at the low end, and then boosted the overall brightness using the gamma slider to where it looked ok but not overly bright.  In this example I used 1.20.  With a different sort of picture, you might need to move the white-point down to where the histogram ran out of values on the bright end but this picture had pure white already in it, so that wasn't necessary.  The Auto Levels command actually does the black and white point adjustments but it overdoes them a little so I like using the Levels black and white point sliders to be more precise:
    Next I did like how you brought out a little more detail in the highlights, so used Shadows/Highlights to compress the light values slightly, and also used the Midtone Contrast to give the textures of the image a little more pop:
    None of this increased the saturation appreciably nor compressed the dynamic range so much to make things seem unnatural.
    I left your sharpening except using a threshold of 15 as I stated, above.  This image was quite blurry so it probably needed more sharpening attention using different radii and perhaps the other sharpening tool, but I didn't want to spend time with that since the most obvious issue at hand was oversaturation.
    The second technique, which is a bit more radical but more useful in my opinion, is to open the JPG in the Camera Raw plug-in despite not being a raw format file.  This has the advantage of having all the toning sliders available at once without having to go though various menus and buttons to find each small set of adjustments and also just one Auto button to click, though usually I back off most of what the Auto decided for me but it's still something quick to try at the beginning.  There is also better sharpening and noise reduction.
    Ok, to open a non-raw file in the Camera Raw plug-in, you can use File / Open As... and after choosing the image, set the File Type to Camera Raw, then click Open:
    Here is your original image opened in Adobe Camera Raw (ACR) with all the toning adjustments at zero:
    Below is how I adjusted the toning sliders.  I had first clicked Auto and didn't like how it was too dark, so I only left the Blacks at +1 from that, and reset or readjusted everything else.  The overall image seemed a little dark to me so I increased the Exposure by half-a-stop, but that washed out the highlights so I dialed them back by setting Highlights to -87, just so there was some detail in the chin fur and foreground rock.  Finally I increased the Clarity, which inreases the contrast of the textures, and finally I added a tiny bit of Vibrance.  If I had adjusted the blackopint down quite a bit, then that might have oversaturated everything, and I could have addressed that by merely setting the Vibrance or Saturation to a slightly negative value.  I also like a little bit extra color in my processing, so a slight bit of added Vibrance seemed good to me.  The Vibrance slider is different than Saturation in that it doesn't boost skin tones (reds/oranges/yellows) as much as the greens and blues, so it works to increase color in people pictures without overdoing their skin.  I've put the original to the right on the same line so it's easier to compare:
    Besides toning you can do detail adjustment, which involves sharpening and noise-reduction.  Here is the face portion of the originally processed image at 100% if you click on it.  The first thing you'll notice is that all the grainy noise is sharpened even in areas that are out of focus or blurred due to the left-right camera motion, and the other thing to notice is the green and mostly reddish-purple splotches of color noise that weren't quite all removed in camera:
    Here are the Sharpness and Noise-Reduction settings I settled on after a few minutes:
    The main thing to notice is that the only sharpened parts are the ones that have relatively sharp details, the glint in the eyes and the fur on their side of the eyes and a bit of the whiskers.  The rest is mostly out of focus.  For a better shot, without the camera motion, the sharpening settings might have been entirely different.  The way I accomplished only sharpening the edges that where relatively sharp already and ignoring the noise and other out-of-focus areas was with the Sharpen Masking setting, which is 77 in this case. This is somewhat similar to the threshold setting of the sharpening in the regular Unsharp Mask in PSE, but it has a way to set it visually, by holding down the Alt key while sliding the Masking slider back and forth until only the bolder edges are shown:
    I see in this screenshot that I had the Detail slider set to 5, which was probably better than the 25 I used in the screenshot, above.  The other thing to notice is the Luminance and Color sliders in the Noise Reduction area are set to reduce the tiny specs of noise and the green/purple splotches.
    One thing I need to mention about using Camera Raw is that I think in PSE10 the highest version you can update to may be ACR 6.7 which won't have the same set of toning sliders as in my example--I hacked a version of the 7.1 beta plug-in to use with it to get the new sliders, but normally you would have those available in PSE10 I don't think.  You would need to use PSE11 or better yet, wait for PSE12 which comes out in another week or two.
    This new method of toning and detail adjustment works ok with images one-by-one via File / Open, but it isn't that efficient ot use for many images.  The best thing for that that isn't expensive Photoshop, would be to get Lightroom, which has these same adjustments but also optimized to work with dozens, hundreds, or more images from one photoshoot.  The other benefit to Lightroom is that you can use a wide array of filters and brushes that are limited in the Elements-hosted version of the Camera Raw plug-in.
    Remember when I said I thought the overall fox picture was too dark, well what is really wrong is the fox is too dark and I could care less about the rocks and other non-important background items.  Here is a version of the same fox picture using Lightroom's radial filter to darken the surroundings so the fox is more prominent.  The one without the radial filter darkening is at the right:
    Lightroom is currently on sale for $129.99 and upgrades are $79.99 with a 30-day trial version available for download if you want to try it:
    http://www.adobe.com/lightroom/

  • Over-saturation/Vibrancy/Incorrect color-sync

    Whatever you want to call it. I've seen there are a couple of other posts but wondered if there was a different name that people were calling it.
    Automaticlly iphoto shows photos as being over-saturated, so does preview and lightroom which makes it incredibly hard to edit because the colors aren't accurate.
    PLEASE HELP? No one at my local Apple store could figure it out.

    Is it a system wide appearance problem or just with the pictures? If system wide, try looking at System Preferences/Displays and checking you have the correct 'profile' selected. If it's just the pictures, is it possible that these pictures came from the same camera and that the camera exposure setting is out of whack?

  • Over saturated and contrast with previews in Aperture 3.4.5

    When I import photos from my Nikon D700 I import both RAW and JPEG with RAW as the master. The initial previews are great, but as soon as aperture updates the preview it becomes over saturated with too much contrast. I have tried post import processing with both Aperture and Camera presets with the same result. I have followed other similar threads that go into the technical details of what a preview is, this is fine, but what I want to know is what I'm doing that stops me from keeping the original good preview image. Can anyone tell me exactly where the initial preview was generated adn how to keep it?
    Cheers
    P.S. i have temporarily disabled this terrible change by toggling 'P'

    Can anyone tell me exactly where the initial preview was generated adn how to keep it?
    Haggy72,
    as you have seen the many threads on previews, I am sure, you know already, that the initial preview is the preview generated by your camera. It reflects all raw processing and all effects set in your camera, but it does not show, what the unprocessed raw image is like.
    Aperture will create a preview, that is showing excatly, how the raw image will look, without any edits applied.  When you are using the raw as original image file, it is necessary, that the preview (and the thumbnail) will show you the raw image as it is. How else are you to know, what edits will be necessary to create the image you want?
    if you want to keep the original, camera generated preview, use the jpeg as original image file. That image is a high resolution version of the preview you like.
    -- Léonie

  • Images viewed in elements organiser appear over saturated compared with acr or editor

    Hi,
    I've been struggling with this for some time now. When veiwing images in elements organiser (10) the images have started appearing more saturated than in either adobe camera raw or photoshop elements editor window. They used to always match. I've tried reseting all the colour presets, I've tried changing every setting I can find in acr and I've resorted to a full re-install of elements (including deleting the presets). None of thise have solved the problem.
    I'm pretty sure it is the organiser view which is over saturated rather than acr / photoshop which is washed out as, although mostly quite subtle, sometimes the colours are pushed much too far. (I'm only describing it as saturation as that's how it looks - I couldn't say for sure that it is acutally a saturation setting rather than some other colour setting which is causing the issue).
    Every so often  organiser updates it's images as I veiw them to match acr but I've not noticed any one reason why that happens - and if I shut organser down and restart it's back to over saturation again.
    Any suggestions would be greatfully recieved,
    Stuart Martindale

    Ken,
    Thanks for getting back to me. You're right - it would seem that if I have every thing set to always optimize for computer screens then everything looks the same. Ideally I wouldn't have that set though - the photos are all taken with adobe RGB colour space and we are more given to big prints than sharing on screen.
    This never used to be a problem and I've always previously optimised for printing. The pictures are definitley adobe RGB and checking in canon DPP the raw veiw there is the same as ACR so it is the initial organizer colouring which is at fault. I would rather use optimize for printing as we tend to make big prints from our photos rather than sharing electronic albums. Following the suggestion I've done some more playing with settings and found the following situations:
    1) If opening organizer when set to optimize for printing the image opens with the wrong colouring. Changing to optimze for screen and update thumbnial and the colouring corrects. Changing back to optimize for printing update thumbnail and any subsequent changes and the colouring stays correct.
    2) If opening organizer when set to optimize for computer screens orgainzer opens showing the right colouring. Chaning to optimize for printing and update thumbnail causes the colouring the change. Changing back to optimize for screen and the image corrects it's self. Changing back to optimize for printing and any subsequent changes and the colouring stays correct.
    So in summary the first thumbnail viewing optimized for printing is over satuarated / vivid. Changing colourspace away and back seems to correct the problem.
    If the colouring is correct for one photo it will update to be correct for any other images viewed.
    If there is a way to make optimized for printing photos display correctly on first opening that would be great.

  • Overly saturated profiles

    As I wrote in a previous thread (http://forums.adobe.com/thread/872324?tstart=30), I used DNG Profile Editor to generate dual-illuminant profiles for my Nikon D300 and D7000. To avoid red channel clipping, I was careful to expose to the left, perhaps with as much as 1/3 EV under-exposure. The resultant dual-illuminant profiles render overly saturated (and contrasty) photos. Should I expose more to the right, or is there another issue to watch out for to avoid these types of results?

    eswrite wrote:
    I forgot to mention that I shot the 6500K exposure(s) with the Colorchecker target under full sun (yes, evenly illuminated) at or around 5500K (according to DNG Profile Editor) -- perhaps that's the issue?
    I doubt the values are an issue. That is, they all vary depending on the software product (a kelvin value is a range of colors and a pretty big range at that). YMMV so trying to hit a specific number is an exercise in frustration.

  • Why does itunes say i have over 700 photos on my phone but i really only have about 200?

    I have a 4S running 8.1.1  and on itunes when i connect my phone it says i have 700+ pictures when in reality by camera roll has less than 200. I am connected to ICloud but I turned off all settings in the "Photos" section of the Icloud settings. I did sync all my photos that are on my phone on to IPhoto on my computer. Does ITunes count the pictures on IPhoto on my computer and my Camera roll to make over 700+ photos? That is the best guess i have and i think is unlikely. Help!

    Try looking at the previous posts on the right side of this page under the heading "More Like This" with your same problem.

Maybe you are looking for