Package Sign Error

Hi,
I have noticed the next error:
(1/1) checking package integrity                                                                        [#############################################################] 100%
error: ddd: signature from "Eric Belanger <[email protected]>" is invalid
error: failed to commit transaction (invalid or corrupted package (PGP signature))
Errors occurred, no packages were upgraded.
This happens with some packages, while others installs/upgrades normally without an error.
It does not depend on the mainteiner, since others packages from the same maintainer installs correctly.
I have reported a bug with one of this packages: "vlc" and the bug was closed as the maintainer told the package was correct.
It also does not depends on the repo, since the problem arises in different repos.
I have also tried to delete the "/etc/pacman.d/gnupg" directory, and follow the instruction to get it again.
I have also tried to change the keyserver in "gpg.conf".
The problem remains.
Is there any way to manually check the signature of the package?
thanks,

# /etc/pacman.conf
# See the pacman.conf(5) manpage for option and repository directives
# GENERAL OPTIONS
[options]
# The following paths are commented out with their default values listed.
# If you wish to use different paths, uncomment and update the paths.
#RootDir = /
#DBPath = /var/lib/pacman/
CacheDir = /dev/shm/pkg/
#LogFile = /var/log/pacman.log
#GPGDir = /etc/pacman.d/gnupg/
HoldPkg = pacman glibc
# If upgrades are available for these packages they will be asked for first
SyncFirst = pacman
#XferCommand = /usr/bin/curl -C - -f %u > %o
#XferCommand = /usr/bin/wget --passive-ftp -c -O %o %u
#CleanMethod = KeepInstalled
Architecture = auto
# Pacman won't upgrade packages listed in IgnorePkg and members of IgnoreGroup
#IgnorePkg =
#IgnoreGroup =
#NoUpgrade =
#NoExtract =
# Misc options
#UseSyslog
#UseDelta
#TotalDownload
CheckSpace
#VerbosePkgLists
# By default, pacman accepts packages signed by keys that its local keyring
# trusts (see pacman-key and its man page), as well as unsigned packages.
#SigLevel = Optional TrustedOnly
# NOTE: You must run `pacman-key --init` before first using pacman; the local
# keyring can then be populated with the keys of all official Arch Linux
# packagers with `pacman-key --populate archlinux`.
# REPOSITORIES
# - can be defined here or included from another file
# - pacman will search repositories in the order defined here
# - local/custom mirrors can be added here or in separate files
# - repositories listed first will take precedence when packages
# have identical names, regardless of version number
# - URLs will have $repo replaced by the name of the current repo
# - URLs will have $arch replaced by the name of the architecture
# Repository entries are of the format:
# [repo-name]
# Server = ServerName
# Include = IncludePath
# The header [repo-name] is crucial - it must be present and
# uncommented to enable the repo.
# The testing repositories are disabled by default. To enable, uncomment the
# repo name header and Include lines. You can add preferred servers immediately
# after the header, and they will be used before the default mirrors.
#[testing]
#SigLevel = PackageRequired
#Include = /etc/pacman.d/mirrorlist
[core]
SigLevel = PackageRequired
Include = /etc/pacman.d/mirrorlist
[extra]
SigLevel = PackageRequired
Include = /etc/pacman.d/mirrorlist
#[community-testing]
#SigLevel = PackageRequired
#Include = /etc/pacman.d/mirrorlist
[community]
SigLevel = PackageRequired
Include = /etc/pacman.d/mirrorlist
# If you want to run 32 bit applications on your x86_64 system,
# enable the multilib repositories as required here.
#[multilib-testing]
#SigLevel = PackageRequired
#Include = /etc/pacman.d/mirrorlist
[multilib]
SigLevel = PackageRequired
Include = /etc/pacman.d/mirrorlist
# An example of a custom package repository. See the pacman manpage for
# tips on creating your own repositories.
#[custom]
#SigLevel = Optional TrustAll
#Server = file:///home/custompkgs
[archlinuxfr]
SigLevel = Optional TrustAll
Server = http://repo.archlinux.fr/$arch

Similar Messages

  • Upgrade of 700MB fails due to Package signing

    Downloaded much but received error message regarding package signing.  Nothing was installed...........
    My pacman.conf has ...SigLevel = Never... so am wondering how I can be in error for package signing?
    Is it now mandatory?

    Sorry my oops.  Will try again.....
    # /etc/pacman.conf
    # See the pacman.conf(5) manpage for option and repository directives
    # GENERAL OPTIONS
    [options]
    # The following paths are commented out with their default values listed.
    # If you wish to use different paths, uncomment and update the paths.
    #RootDir = /
    #DBPath = /var/lib/pacman/
    #CacheDir = /var/cache/pacman/pkg/
    #LogFile = /var/log/pacman.log
    #GPGDir = /etc/pacman.d/gnupg/
    HoldPkg = pacman glibc
    # If upgrades are available for these packages they will be asked for first
    SyncFirst = pacman
    #XferCommand = /usr/bin/curl -C - -f %u > %o
    #XferCommand = /usr/bin/wget --passive-ftp -c -O %o %u
    #CleanMethod = KeepInstalled
    Architecture = auto
    # Pacman won't upgrade packages listed in IgnorePkg and members of IgnoreGroup
    #IgnorePkg =
    #IgnoreGroup =
    #NoUpgrade =
    #NoExtract =
    # Misc options
    #UseSyslog
    #UseDelta
    #TotalDownload
    CheckSpace
    #VerbosePkgLists
    # PGP signature checking
    # NOTE: None of this will work without running `pacman-key --init` first.
    # The compiled in default is equivalent to the following line. This requires
    # you to locally sign and trust packager keys using `pacman-key` for them to be
    # considered valid.
    #SigLevel = Optional TrustedOnly
    # If you wish to check signatures but avoid local sign and trust issues, use
    # the following line. This will treat any key imported into pacman's keyring as
    # trusted.
    #SigLevel = Optional TrustAll
    # For now, off by default unless you read the above.
    SigLevel = Never
    # REPOSITORIES
    # - can be defined here or included from another file
    # - pacman will search repositories in the order defined here
    # - local/custom mirrors can be added here or in separate files
    # - repositories listed first will take precedence when packages
    # have identical names, regardless of version number
    # - URLs will have $repo replaced by the name of the current repo
    # - URLs will have $arch replaced by the name of the architecture
    # Repository entries are of the format:
    # [repo-name]
    # Server = ServerName
    # Include = IncludePath
    # The header [repo-name] is crucial - it must be present and
    # uncommented to enable the repo.
    # The testing repositories are disabled by default. To enable, uncomment the
    # repo name header and Include lines. You can add preferred servers immediately
    # after the header, and they will be used before the default mirrors.
    #[testing]
    #SigLevel = PackageRequired
    #Include = /etc/pacman.d/mirrorlist
    [core]
    #SigLevel = PackageRequired
    Include = /etc/pacman.d/mirrorlist
    [extra]
    #SigLevel = PackageOptional
    Include = /etc/pacman.d/mirrorlist
    #[community-testing]
    #SigLevel = PackageRequired
    #Include = /etc/pacman.d/mirrorlist
    [community]
    #SigLevel = PackageOptional
    Include = /etc/pacman.d/mirrorlist
    # If you want to run 32 bit applications on your x86_64 system,
    # enable the multilib repositories as required here.
    #[multilib-testing]
    #SigLevel = PackageRequired
    #Include = /etc/pacman.d/mirrorlist
    #[multilib]
    SigLevel = PackageOptional
    Include = /etc/pacman.d/mirrorlist
    # An example of a custom package repository. See the pacman manpage for
    # tips on creating your own repositories.
    #[custom]
    #SigLevel = Optional TrustAll
    #Server = file:///home/custompkgs

  • App Signing Error, Number of Folios Does Not Match the Main Folio File

    Hi All;
      I have a 250 page standalone app that I am trying to compile for the Apple Store. I read through the forums and enabled "AppBuilderLoggingEnabled.cfg" in my user directory to capture the issue. Here is the snippet of the log that was created that, to me, shows why the app isn't being signed.
    46386 ERROR [main] codesign.Signer - Failure during signing
    java.lang.RuntimeException: invalid package, number of folios does not match the main folio file (Folio.xml or Issue.xml) 251-250
              at com.adobe.devtech.codesign.IPAOutputHelper.convertFolioProduceFormatToFolio(IPAOutputHelp er.java:272)
              at com.adobe.devtech.codesign.IPAOutputHelper.replacePlaceholderFolio(IPAOutputHelper.java:1 92)
              at com.adobe.devtech.codesign.IPAOutputHelper.execute(IPAOutputHelper.java:82)
              at com.adobe.devtech.codesign.Signer.sign(Signer.java:169)
              at com.adobe.devtech.codesign.Signer.processArgs(Signer.java:106)
              at com.adobe.devtech.codesign.Signer.main(Signer.java:46)
    46388 ERROR [main] codesign.Signer - Error: invalid package, number of folios does not match the main folio file (Folio.xml or Issue.xml) 251-250
    I've stripped out special characters from the article titles and re-built the app only to face the same error. I went ahead and created a new AppID in the Apple Developer Portal, created new provision files, and the error remains. I am now creating a new folio and importing the articles into the new folio to see if that will solve the "number of folios does not match" issue.
    Any help or insight would be amazing. Thank you all.
    -matt

    I created a new folio and imported all of the articles again. After hitting "Create App" for this new folio, at about 10 pages in a "PDF Export" error stopped the create app process. I went into InDesign to update the layout for the 10th page to see that the PDF export issue was stopping me from updating the layouts as well. Something in the InDesign file wasn't playing nice with the folio creation, so I created two new InDesign files, deleted the article, and built a new article from scratch. I was able to import the new layouts as a new article to the main folio and hit "Create App" again. This time there were no issues with the creation process. I synched up the provision files in App Builder and was able to code sign the application.
    I guess the moral of the story is to double and even triple check every article along the way to make sure there are no issues being introduced into the process that will ultimately cause headaches during the distribution phase of app creation!
    -matt

  • AIR 15.0 for OSX - ADT: Packaging failed. Packager internal error

    Packaging a SWF to AIR with captive runtime and native installer (using "-package bundle"), building on PC worked perfectly fine.  After making all of the requisite changes to make it work for Mac, I'm now running into the "Packaging failed. Packager internal error" when building using adt through the command line.  My .command script is as follows:
    cd [directory]
    adt -package -storetype pkcs12 -keystore ../cert/key.p12 -storepass pw -target bundle Bundle ../App.xml App.swf -extdir ../lib icons/16.png icons/32.png icons/128.png
    What can cause this vague "Packger interal error" error? Any help would be appreciated. Thank you.

    Steve
    I have same problem with apple Developer Id Application certificate (downloaded from apple), got past the chain error message by including intermediate and root certificates when I exported from keychain, but got the package error referenced here. Also when I sign on windows machine with my code signing certificate (selecting windows installer) all publishes ok, but the certificate is not attached, says 'unknown developer' when I down load and try and run installer on windows machine. I sent the exe to Comodo (the guys I got the code signing certificate from) and they say the exe is not signed.
    Finally I get 'The digital certificate is invalid'  error when I try and use 'Developer Id Installer' certificate (downloaded from apple).
    I think there must be several problems here with Air SDK.
    Stopping me from publishing and I have a very upset Customer. Can someone from Adobe please advise asap.

  • [Solved] Using pacman's package signing correctly

    When pacman 4 first came out, I just merged the pacnew file so that package signing was disabled. I did initialise the keys etc. but I didn't import or sign the master keys or enable signature checks.
    So tonight I figured I would start seeing how this worked. I took the fingerprints from the master key list on archlinux's site and I checked they matched the fingerprints listed on Allan's blog. I then imported the five master keys using pacman-key, signed them locally and used --edit-key to assign each of the five marginal trust.
    I then commented out the "Never" line for package signing in pacman.conf so that it would use the compiled in default to make signatures optional but check them if available. I also set PackageRequired for the core repository.  I left the other repos I have enabled to default to the default policy as I think signing isn't complete for them.
    I then ran pacman -Syu. This mostly went OK but I'm slightly worried about this bit:
    error: gsm: key "7F2D434B9741E8AC" is unknown
    :: Import PGP key 9741E8AC, "Pierre Schmitz <[email protected]>", created 2011-04-10? [Y/n] y
    error: jbig2dec: key "BBE43771487328A9" is unknown
    :: Import PGP key 487328A9, "Bartlomiej Piotrowski <[email protected]>", created 2011-10-10? [Y/n] y
    error: p11-kit: key "E8F18BA1615137BC" is unknown
    :: Import PGP key 615137BC, "Ionut Biru <[email protected]>", created 2011-04-19? [Y/n] y
    error: pacmatic: key "396E3E25BAB142C1" is unknown
    :: Import PGP key BAB142C1, "Kyle Keen <[email protected]>", created 2011-02-03? [Y/n] y
    error: patchutils: key "06096A6AD1CEDDAC" is unknown
    :: Import PGP key D1CEDDAC, "Laurent Carlier <[email protected]>", created 2011-10-30? [Y/n] y
    error: perl-encode-locale: key "F99FFE0FEAE999BD" is unknown
    :: Import PGP key EAE999BD, "Allan McRae <[email protected]>", created 2011-06-03? [Y/n] y
    error: vlc: key "B7310AE5F04569AE" is unknown
    :: Import PGP key F04569AE, "Giovanni Scafora <[email protected]>", created 2011-10-15? [Y/n] y
    I initially thought I was just telling pacman to import the keys but now I'm wondering if I also told it to trust them and if I wasn't meant to do that? Should they have been automatically handled if they were signed correctly? I was trying to follow the instructions on Allan's blog which show this question and Allan answering yes. However, I now realise that I got confused and that that bit comes *before* Allan imports and trusts the master keys, but I'd already done that at this point. (But it didn't complain they were untrusted once imported...)
    Could somebody either reassure me that I did this correctly (securely)? Or advise me on how to undo it if that's what I should do?
    Last edited by cfr (2012-02-19 15:14:02)

    I followed Allan's guide on page
    http://allanmcrae.com/2011/12/pacman-pa … rch-linux/
    and pacman -Syu gave:
    error: xorg-bdftopcf: signature from "Allan McRae <[email protected]>" is marginal trust
    Which is suprising as his key is one of master keys. Currently several master keys were revoked.
    Based on GPG's output it is maybe requires some additional input to mark the revoked key as trusted:
    sub  3072R/B20030F3  created: 2011-11-25  revoked: 2011-11-25  usage: A   
    [  full  ] (1). Ionut Biru (Arch Linux Master Key) <[email protected]>
    Please decide how far you trust this user to correctly verify other users' keys
    (by looking at passports, checking fingerprints from different sources, etc.)
    gpg gives this:
      1 = I don't know or won't say
      2 = I do NOT trust
      3 = I trust marginally
      4 = I trust fully
      5 = I trust ultimately
      m = back to the main menu
    full story:
    [root@archbang ~]# for key in FFF979E7 CDFD6BB0 4C7EA887 6AC6A4C2 824B18E8; do
    > printf 'trust\n3\nquit\n' | gpg --homedir /etc/pacman.d/gnupg/ --no-permission-warning --command-fd 0 --edit-key $key
    > done
    pub  3072R/4C7EA887  created: 2011-11-25  expires: never       usage: SC 
                         trust: marginal      validity: full
    This key was revoked on 2011-11-25 by RSA key 4C7EA887 Ionut Biru (Arch Linux Master Key) <[email protected]>
    sub  1024R/93F91AC3  created: 2011-11-25  revoked: 2011-11-25  usage: E   
    This key was revoked on 2011-11-25 by RSA key 4C7EA887 Ionut Biru (Arch Linux Master Key) <[email protected]>
    sub  3072R/B20030F3  created: 2011-11-25  revoked: 2011-11-25  usage: A   
    [  full  ] (1). Ionut Biru (Arch Linux Master Key) <[email protected]>
    pub  3072R/4C7EA887  created: 2011-11-25  expires: never       usage: SC 
                         trust: marginal      validity: full
    This key was revoked on 2011-11-25 by RSA key 4C7EA887 Ionut Biru (Arch Linux Master Key) <[email protected]>
    sub  1024R/93F91AC3  created: 2011-11-25  revoked: 2011-11-25  usage: E   
    This key was revoked on 2011-11-25 by RSA key 4C7EA887 Ionut Biru (Arch Linux Master Key) <[email protected]>
    sub  3072R/B20030F3  created: 2011-11-25  revoked: 2011-11-25  usage: A   
    [  full  ] (1). Ionut Biru (Arch Linux Master Key) <[email protected]>
    Please decide how far you trust this user to correctly verify other users' keys
    (by looking at passports, checking fingerprints from different sources, etc.)
      1 = I don't know or won't say
      2 = I do NOT trust
      3 = I trust marginally
      4 = I trust fully
      5 = I trust ultimately
      m = back to the main menu
    pub  3072R/4C7EA887  created: 2011-11-25  expires: never       usage: SC 
                         trust: marginal      validity: full
    This key was revoked on 2011-11-25 by RSA key 4C7EA887 Ionut Biru (Arch Linux Master Key) <[email protected]>
    sub  1024R/93F91AC3  created: 2011-11-25  revoked: 2011-11-25  usage: E   
    This key was revoked on 2011-11-25 by RSA key 4C7EA887 Ionut Biru (Arch Linux Master Key) <[email protected]>
    sub  3072R/B20030F3  created: 2011-11-25  revoked: 2011-11-25  usage: A   
    [  full  ] (1). Ionut Biru (Arch Linux Master Key) <[email protected]>
    pub  3072R/6AC6A4C2  created: 2011-11-18  expires: never       usage: SC 
                         trust: marginal      validity: full
    sub  1024R/86872C2F  created: 2011-11-18  expires: never       usage: E   
    sub  3072R/1B516B59  created: 2011-11-18  expires: never       usage: A   
    [  full  ] (1). Pierre Schmitz (Arch Linux Master Key) <[email protected]>
    pub  3072R/6AC6A4C2  created: 2011-11-18  expires: never       usage: SC 
                         trust: marginal      validity: full
    sub  1024R/86872C2F  created: 2011-11-18  expires: never       usage: E   
    sub  3072R/1B516B59  created: 2011-11-18  expires: never       usage: A   
    [  full  ] (1). Pierre Schmitz (Arch Linux Master Key) <[email protected]>
    Please decide how far you trust this user to correctly verify other users' keys
    (by looking at passports, checking fingerprints from different sources, etc.)
      1 = I don't know or won't say
      2 = I do NOT trust
      3 = I trust marginally
      4 = I trust fully
      5 = I trust ultimately
      m = back to the main menu
    pub  3072R/6AC6A4C2  created: 2011-11-18  expires: never       usage: SC 
                         trust: marginal      validity: full
    sub  1024R/86872C2F  created: 2011-11-18  expires: never       usage: E   
    sub  3072R/1B516B59  created: 2011-11-18  expires: never       usage: A   
    [  full  ] (1). Pierre Schmitz (Arch Linux Master Key) <[email protected]>
    I got to go now I will try gpg key edit later. If someone knows what to do please help.
    Thanks

  • ADT native package signing issue

    Hi all,
    I'm having a problem signing an executable with adt. I don't wan't a timestamp so I execute following command in command line:
    "adt -package -storetype pkcs12 -keystore D:\workspaces\a327-shell\IDA_Certificate.p12 -keypass AIRRules -storepass AIRRules -tsa none -target native -storetype pkcs12 -keystore D:\workspaces\a327-shell\IDA_Certificate.p12 -keypass AIRRules -storepass AIRRules -tsa none shell-0.5-RELEASE.exe shell-app.xml shell-0.5-RELEASE.swf assets"
    This returns the following error: "Could not apply timestamp to setup.msi"
    This seems to refer to the native signing options part and not the AIR signing options but I have found no way to fix this.
    Anyone with ideas on how to fix this, it's pretty critical to the project.
    Thx,
    David

    flamelab wrote:
    bangkok_manouel wrote:
    wonder wrote:
    i don't really want to read your crappy blog. You said about reddit, post the damn reddit link
    p.s that blog is kinda useless, new one, only one post. doesn't worth trying reading. That ideas are not original, almost copy/pasted from an old one
    so nice and polite...
    I think wonder is being "impolite", because that particular blog post is an exact copy of a continuous rant of a (banned now) member here in the forums about package signing. So he (that member) is doing the same thing outside the forums, in a blog. It would be much better from him to have helped, instead of ranting.
    He's been spamming Linux-related forums for the last several weeks about this issue, just generally rabble-rousing.  From what I've seen, the guy may have done the community a favor, since numerous respondents have basically said "I was gonna try Arch 'cuz a friend of a friend said it was cool, but wasn't aware of this issue or how Arch worked, and now I'm scared and don't think I'll bother."  Basically diverting the intellectually lazy away from Arch.  He claims to have come up with an easily-implemented solution; however, he also claims the devs have basically blown his brilliant idea off. And he can't be bothered to patch and repackage pacman and sign some packages himself (as an open and observable test-case) despite supposedly having the resources and skills necessary to do so.

  • ADF Mobile: Code Signing Error Workaround

    Hi, everyone:
    If you are doing ADF Mobile development, and you need to deploy the application to an iOS device, you would need to compile/deploy the app with iOS App Certificates and Provisioning Profile. This means you would need to "Deploy to Package" or "Deploy to iTunes" during deployment, and configure JDeveloper with the proper certificates/profiles. In some instances (exact combination is still not clear), deploy and signing the application to generate the ipa file may fail with similar error message at the end of the deployment log:
    [01:04:45 PM] Deployment failed due to one or more errors returned by '/usr/bin/xcrun'. The following is a summary of the returned error(s): Command-line execution failed (Return code: 1) error: /usr/bin/codesign force preserve-metadata=identifier,entitlements,resource-rules sign iPhone Distribution: Oracle Corporation resource-rules=/var/folders/x7/21sjrpx13qj9tq20z14s3j_w0000gn/T/tkROhP11qU/Payload/HelloWorld.app/ResourceRules.plist --entitlements /var/folders/x7/21sjrpx13qj9tq20z14s3j_w0000gn/T/tkROhP11qU/entitlements_plistEINPBkIG /var/folders/x7/21sjrpx13qj9tq20z14s3j_w0000gn/T/tkROhP11qU/Payload/HelloWorld.app failed with error 1. Output: /var/folders/x7/21sjrpx13qj9tq20z14s3j_w0000gn/T/tkROhP11qU/Payload/HelloWorld.app: replacing existing signature Program /usr/bin/codesign returned 1 : [/var/folders/x7/21sjrpx13qj9tq20z14s3j_w0000gn/T/tkROhP11qU/Payload/HelloWorld.app: replacing existing signature 
    This issue is a known issue and is not related to ADF Mobile. The workaround is discussed in this article:
    http://stackoverflow.com/questions/7425840/that-codesign-returned-1-object-ifile-format-invalid-or-unsuitable-problem-aga
    This article refers to the old location of Xcode, so you would need to adjust the paths accordingly. The path for Xcode 4.3 and above would be like:
    /Applications/Xcode.app/Contents//Developer/Platforms/iPhoneOS.platform/Developer/usr/bin/PackageApplication to this script file.
    To modify it, you probably can’t use TextEdit. I end up opening a terminal session, changed the file permission, and used vi to update it.
    This fixed the issue I was having.
    Hope this is helpful - please drop a reply if you encountered the same issue.
    Thanks,
    Joe Huang

    I ran the entire code and the output is:
    [02:40:18 PM] Updating iOS profile dependencies with FAR profiles created from application projects...
    [02:40:18 PM] ---- Deployment started. ----
    [02:40:18 PM] Target platform is (iOS).
    [02:40:18 PM] Beginning deployment of ADF Mobile application 'Application1' to iOS using profile 'IOS_MOBILE_Application1'.
    [02:40:18 PM] Command-line executed: [Applications/Xcode.app/Contents/Developer/Platforms/iPhoneSimulator.platform/Developer/usr/bin/xcodebuild, -version]
    [02:40:18 PM] Command-line execution succeeded.
    [02:40:18 PM] Running dependency analysis...
    [02:40:18 PM] Building...
    [02:40:18 PM] Deploying 3 profiles...
    [02:40:18 PM] Wrote Archive Module to /java/development/JDev11gBuild6276.1Sandpit/Application1/ApplicationController/deploy/ApplicationController.jar
    [02:40:18 PM] WARNING: No Resource Catalog enabled ADF components found to package
    [02:40:18 PM] Wrote Archive Module to /java/development/JDev11gBuild6276.1Sandpit/Application1/ViewController/deploy/ViewController.jar
    [02:40:18 PM] Verifying Application Controller project exists...
    [02:40:18 PM] Verifying application dependencies...
    [02:40:18 PM] Validating application XML files...
    [02:40:18 PM] Validating XML files in project ApplicationController...
    [02:40:18 PM] Validating XML files in project ViewController...
    [02:40:18 PM] Copying common javascript files...
    [02:40:21 PM] Copying FARs to the ADF Mobile Framework application...
    [02:40:21 PM] Copying FAR from source: ViewController...
    [02:40:21 PM] Copying FAR from source: ApplicationController...
    [02:40:21 PM] Deploying skinning files...
    [02:40:21 PM] Copying the CVM SDK files built for the ARM processor...
    [02:40:21 PM] Copying the CVM JDK files built for the ARM processor...
    [02:40:21 PM] Command-line executed: [cp, -R, -p, /java/jdeveloper/JDev11gBuild6276.1/jdeveloper/jdev/extensions/oracle.adf.mobile/iOS/jvmti/arm/, /java/development/JDev11gBuild6276.1Sandpit/Application1/deploy/IOS_MOBILE_Application1/temporary_xcode_project/lib]
    [02:40:21 PM] Command-line execution succeeded.
    [02:40:21 PM] Command-line executed: [cp, -R, -p, /java/jdeveloper/JDev11gBuild6276.1/jdeveloper/jdev/extensions/oracle.adf.mobile/iOS/jvmti/jar/, /java/development/JDev11gBuild6276.1Sandpit/Application1/deploy/IOS_MOBILE_Application1/temporary_xcode_project/lib]
    [02:40:21 PM] Command-line execution succeeded.
    [02:40:21 PM] Copying security related files to the ADF Mobile Framework application...
    [02:40:22 PM] Command-line executed from path: /java/development/JDev11gBuild6276.1Sandpit/Application1/deploy/IOS_MOBILE_Application1/temporary_xcode_project/
    [02:40:22 PM] Command-line executed: /Applications/Xcode.app/Contents/Developer/Platforms/iPhoneSimulator.platform/Developer/usr/bin/xcodebuild clean install -configuration Debug -sdk iphoneos DSTROOT=/java/development/JDev11gBuild6276.1Sandpit/Application1/deploy/IOS_MOBILE_Application1/Destination_Root/ ARCHS=armv7 VALID_ARCHS=armv7 ONLY_ACTIVE_ARCHS=NO CODE_SIGN_IDENTITY=iPhone Developer: Eddie V Phan (QV69QS58FK) IPHONEOS_DEPLOYMENT_TARGET=5.0 TARGETED_DEVICE_FAMILY=1,2 PRODUCT_NAME=Application1 ADD_SETTINGS_BUNDLE=NO
    [02:40:30 PM] ld: warning: PIE disabled. Absolute addressing (perhaps -mdynamic-no-pic) not allowed in code signed PIE, but used in CVMmemoryBarrier from Frameworks/OracleCVM.sdk/libcvmadf_arm_debug.a(atomic_arm.o). To fix this warning, don't compile with -mdynamic-no-pic or link with -Wl,-no_pie
    [02:40:30 PM] Command-line execution succeeded.
    [02:40:30 PM] Command-line executed from path: /java/development/JDev11gBuild6276.1Sandpit/Application1/deploy/IOS_MOBILE_Application1/Destination_Root/Oracle_ADFmc_Container_Application/device/
    [02:40:30 PM] Command-line executed: /usr/bin/xcrun -sdk iphoneos PackageApplication -v /java/development/JDev11gBuild6276.1Sandpit/Application1/deploy/IOS_MOBILE_Application1/Destination_Root/Applications/Application1.app -o /java/development/JDev11gBuild6276.1Sandpit/Application1/deploy/IOS_MOBILE_Application1/Destination_Root/Oracle_ADFmc_Container_Application/device/Application1.ipa sign iPhone Developer: Eddie V Phan (QV69QS58FK) embed /developement/iOS_Provisioning_Profile/devTest.mobileprovision
    [02:40:31 PM] error: /usr/bin/codesign force preserve-metadata=identifier,entitlements,resource-rules sign iPhone Developer: Eddie V Phan (QV69QS58FK) resource-rules=/var/folders/zm/pnmpplxs2rb7_n29ltfkvpzc0000gn/T/YPzy7_Hf6L/Payload/Application1.app/ResourceRules.plist /var/folders/zm/pnmpplxs2rb7_n29ltfkvpzc0000gn/T/YPzy7_Hf6L/Payload/Application1.app failed with error 1. Output: /var/folders/zm/pnmpplxs2rb7_n29ltfkvpzc0000gn/T/YPzy7_Hf6L/Payload/Application1.app: replacing existing signature
    [02:40:31 PM] Program /usr/bin/codesign returned 1 : [/var/folders/zm/pnmpplxs2rb7_n29ltfkvpzc0000gn/T/YPzy7_Hf6L/Payload/Application1.app: replacing existing signature
    [02:40:31 PM] Command-line execution failed (Return code: 1)
    [02:40:31 PM] Deployment cancelled.
    [02:40:31 PM] ---- Deployment incomplete ----.
    [02:40:31 PM] Failed to package the XCode application.
    [02:40:31 PM] Failed to build the iOS application bundle.
    [02:40:31 PM] Deployment failed due to one or more errors returned by '/usr/bin/xcrun'. The following is a summary of the returned error(s):
    Command-line execution failed (Return code: 1)
    error: /usr/bin/codesign force preserve-metadata=identifier,entitlements,resource-rules sign iPhone Developer: Eddie V Phan (QV69QS58FK) resource-rules=/var/folders/zm/pnmpplxs2rb7_n29ltfkvpzc0000gn/T/YPzy7_Hf6L/Payload/Application1.app/ResourceRules.plist /var/folders/zm/pnmpplxs2rb7_n29ltfkvpzc0000gn/T/YPzy7_Hf6L/Payload/Application1.app failed with error 1. Output: /var/folders/zm/pnmpplxs2rb7_n29ltfkvpzc0000gn/T/YPzy7_Hf6L/Payload/Application1.app: replacing existing signature
    Program /usr/bin/codesign returned 1 : [/var/folders/zm/pnmpplxs2rb7_n29ltfkvpzc0000gn/T/YPzy7_Hf6L/Payload/Application1.app: replacing existing signature
    What do you mean by "the "-sign" parameter values look dubious (besides your name :-P), how can it interpret those spaces?"
    The sign parameter that i'm using is from the KeyChain app, so i'm assuming in the preferences where it asks for the Certificate, that its asking for the certificate name in KeyChain? When trying to escape the spaces in the Preferences menu, it complains that the certificate names do not match.. Or am i meant to be using another parameter here..?
    [02:34:07 PM] Command-line executed from path: /java/development/JDev11gBuild6276.1Sandpit/Application1/deploy/IOS_MOBILE_Application1/temporary_xcode_project/
    [02:34:07 PM] Command-line executed: /Applications/Xcode.app/Contents/Developer/Platforms/iPhoneSimulator.platform/Developer/usr/bin/xcodebuild clean install -configuration Debug -sdk iphoneos DSTROOT=/java/development/JDev11gBuild6276.1Sandpit/Application1/deploy/IOS_MOBILE_Application1/Destination_Root/ ARCHS=armv7 VALID_ARCHS=armv7 ONLY_ACTIVE_ARCHS=NO CODE_SIGN_IDENTITY=iPhone\ Developer:\ Eddie\ V\ Phan\ \(QV69QS58FK\) IPHONEOS_DEPLOYMENT_TARGET=5.0 TARGETED_DEVICE_FAMILY=1,2 PRODUCT_NAME=Application1 ADD_SETTINGS_BUNDLE=NO
    [02:34:09 PM] [BEROR]Code Sign error: The identity 'iPhone\ Developer:\ Eddie\ V\ Phan\ \(QV69QS58FK\)' doesn't match any valid, non-expired certificate/private key pair in your keychains
    [02:34:09 PM] Code Sign error: The identity 'iPhone\ Developer:\ Eddie\ V\ Phan\ \(QV69QS58FK\)' doesn't match any valid, non-expired certificate/private key pair in your keychains
    [02:34:09 PM] Command-line execution failed (Return code: 65)
    [02:34:09 PM] Deployment cancelled.
    [02:34:09 PM] ---- Deployment incomplete ----.
    [02:34:09 PM] Failed to build the iOS application bundle.
    [02:34:09 PM] Deployment failed due to one or more errors returned by '/Applications/Xcode.app/Contents/Developer/Platforms/iPhoneSimulator.platform/Developer/usr/bin/xcodebuild'. The following is a summary of the returned error(s):
    Command-line execution failed (Return code: 65)
    [BEROR]Code Sign error: The identity 'iPhone\ Developer:\ Eddie\ V\ Phan\ \(QV69QS58FK\)' doesn't match any valid, non-expired certificate/private key pair in your keychains
    Code Sign error: The identity 'iPhone\ Developer:\ Eddie\ V\ Phan\ \(QV69QS58FK\)' doesn't match any valid, non-expired certificate/private key pair in your keychains

  • Failed to load Execute Package Task error.

    Hello Experts,
    Excuse my newbie question.
    Execute Package Task: Error: The task has failed to load. The contact information for the task is "Microsoft Corporation; Microsoft SQL Server; Microsoft corporation; All Rights Reserved http://www.microsoft.com/sql/support/default.asp:1"
    We have a windows service running on our app server that deploys a package that executes other packages using execute package task. This package and rest of the packages are in the same folder at the same level under integration services
    catalog. The package fails to execute with the above said error.
    Execute package task is configured to run in 'in-process' mode. Changing delay validation to true/false in child packages didn't help.
    ironically if the package is deployed using a console application from the app server the package gets executed just fine. I checked permissions, everything seem fine.
    Is there anyway to get details of this error to understand the problem better? I am looking at reports > standard reports > all executions.
    Thanks.

    As it turns out, the 63bit ExecPackageTask.dll was not found under "C:\Program Files\Microsoft SQL Server\110\DTS\Binn". Installing "SQL Server Data Tools" installed only 32 bit version of the component under "C:\Program Files (x86)\Microsoft SQL
    Server\110\DTS\Binn".
    Is there a way to get 64bit version of this component without installing "Integration Services" (to avoid possible license issues)?
    Hi Jayakarthiks,
    To make use of the 64-bit ExecPackageTask.dll, you also need the 64-bit SSIS runtime and 64-bit DTExec utility tool. To obtain the 64-bit SSIS runtime and tools, you have to install the SQL Server Integration Services service from your SQL Server 2012 install
    media.
    Reference:
    http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms143731.aspx
    Regards,
    Mike Yin
    If you have any feedback on our support, please click here
    Mike Yin
    TechNet Community Support

  • Package-query: error while loading shared libraries: libcurl.so.4: can

    Hi all
    when i run yaourt to install any things :
    package-query: error while loading shared libraries: libcurl.so.4: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory
    why?
    what can i do?
    I'm very newbie so help me with easy commands!
    thanks

    try to reinstall yahourt :
    https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Yaourt

  • Package Validation Error - SSIS Error Code DTS_E_OLEDBERROR - Error code: 0x80040E4D

    I sometimes get the following error randomly - 
    Package Validation Error
    ADDITIONAL INFORMATION:
    Error at MY_PACKAGE_PLUS[Connection manager "MY_DATABASE"]: SSIS Error Code DTS_E_OLEDBERROR.  An OLE DB error has occurred. Error code: 0x80040E4D.
    An OLE DB record is available.  Source: "Microsoft SQL Server Native Client 10.0"  Hresult: 0x80040E4D  Description: "Login failed for user 'USERNAMEZ'.".
    Error at MY_PACKAGE_PLUS [Log provider "SSIS log provider for SQL Server"]: SSIS Error Code DTS_E_CANNOTACQUIRECONNECTIONFROMCONNECTIONMANAGER.  The AcquireConnection method call to the connection manager "MY_DATABASE" failed with error
    code 0xC0202009.  There may be error messages posted before this with more information on why the AcquireConnection method call failed.
     (Microsoft.DataTransformationServices.VsIntegration)
    My package name in SSIS/BIDS is MY_PACKAGE, but in the error I see MY_PACKAGE_PLUS, which was the name of an older version of the package. This error goes away when I close SSIS and then restart it. I wonder why this happens and how do I fix it
    ? Is this some bug in SSIS ? The same package runs without errors in SQL server agent.
    Thanks.

    It seems the old package reference still exists in your project bin folder or inside stproj file. WHich is why it tries to validate the older package each time when you start  the project.
    Please Mark This As Answer if it helps to solve the issue Visakh ---------------------------- http://visakhm.blogspot.com/ https://www.facebook.com/VmBlogs

  • Package Authoring Error

    Hi
    I may have come to the wrong Forum and if so my apologies but if there is some one who could let me know if i need be concerned of the following errors i have just noticed in Console after having done recent Java And Safari update today.both installations i believe were completed successfully but console is showing the following message.
    13/03/2011 13:43:52 Software Update[133] Software Update Package Authoring Error: installation-check results requires a message
    13/03/2011 13:38:58 Software Update[136] Software Update Package Authoring Error: <choices-outline ui='SoftwareUpdate'> should only have one <line> element. Put additional <line> elements in a <choices-outline ui='invisible'> element.
    Thanks in advance
    Cole

    mach_kernel file missing in root of harddrive
    replaced, now working again

  • MDN Not Signed Error

    After updating a certificate in PI we are facing MDN not signed errors.
    In Seeburger logs, I can see that the response MDN is signed.
    However, Seeburger, doesn't find the signature and generates a negative MDN.
    Unchecking the signature in the receiver AS2 channel fixes the problem.
    This issue seems very similar to the following thread: Seeburger AS2 Adapter: "MDN not signed"
    SAP PI Version : PI 7.11 SP12
    Seeburger AS2 2.1.5
    Original Certificate: 1024 bits
    New Certificate: 2048 bits.
    Any help would be much appreciated.
    Thanks,
    Harsh

    Hi Harsh,
    Check the link mentioned in this blog Certificate and Troubleshooting - Guide for Seeburger - AS2 - Adapter by Stefan Hilpp
    As mentioned here on Page 19, check the Signing Key in your Sender Agreement.
    Maybe the signing key mentioned is wrong.
    Regards,
    Pranil.

  • Ad Hoc provisioning - code sign error...

    I have a bit of a problem creating the ad hoc build for the app....
    Here's what I did so far:
    1. Created the AdHoc provisioning profile on the portal
    2. Downloaded and installed it in Xcode
    3. Copied the Release configuration as AdHoc
    4. As suggested by some blogs, added the Entitlement.plist file - however, the recommended entries are not to be found in the plist file! That line is "get-task-allow" in the xcode window
    The link below points to a screen capture that shows what's happening:
    http://www.mediafire.com/imageview.php?quickkey=43endcalxt7jde4
    top_left: blog that suggest the line to be present in Entitlements.plist file
    top right: xcode window that shows the code sign error and the .plist file
    bottom left: the build parameters for the Ad Hoc build
    bottom right: info about Ad Hoc profile in the organizer. Note the App Identifier.
    The code sign error mentions AppID that is different from the one shown in the Organizer window.
    Help!!
    -S-

    I had to create new profile and that fixed it. Originally, I had used the Bundle name for the current app in the store.
    I was able to make the AdHoc build and distribute it.....

  • CODE SIGNING errors

    I've been notiching a number of "CODE SIGNING" errors on my MacBook Pro. I'm not sure when exactly these started and they're not really affect the system, however I'd really like to find out the root cause. Here's the relevant dmesg entries:
    CODE SIGNING: csinvalidpage(0x100000000): p=10957[MDCrashReportToo] clearing CS_VALID
    CODE SIGNING: csinvalidpage(0x100000000): p=10958[MDCrashReportToo] clearing CS_VALID
    CODE SIGNING: csinvalidpage(0x100000000): p=10960[AppleMobileBacku] clearing CS_VALID
    CODE SIGNING: csinvalidpage(0x100000000): p=11107[MDCrashReportToo] clearing CS_VALID
    CODE SIGNING: csinvalidpage(0x100000000): p=11147[AppleMobileBacku] clearing CS_VALID
    CODE SIGNING: csinvalidpage(0x100000000): p=11148[AppleMobileBacku] clearing CS_VALID
    CODE SIGNING: csinvalidpage(0x100000000): p=11171[MDCrashReportToo] clearing CS_VALID
    CODE SIGNING: csinvalidpage(0x100000000): p=11172[MDCrashReportToo] clearing CS_VALID
    CODE SIGNING: csinvalidpage(0x100000000): p=11214[MDCrashReportToo] clearing CS_VALID
    CODE SIGNING: csinvalidpage(0x100000000): p=11215[MDCrashReportToo] clearing CS_VALID
    CODE SIGNING: csinvalidpage(0x100000000): p=11235[MDCrashReportToo] clearing CS_VALID
    CODE SIGNING: csinvalidpage(0x100000000): p=11237[MDCrashReportToo] clearing CS_VALID
    CODE SIGNING: csinvalidpage(0x100000000): p=11726[MDCrashReportToo] clearing CS_VALID
    CODE SIGNING: csinvalidpage(0x100000000): p=11727[MDCrashReportToo] clearing CS_VALID
    CODE SIGNING: csinvalidpage(0x100000000): p=11729[AppleMobileBacku] clearing CS_VALID
    I'd like to note that it appears to only be two apps... and those process IDs are (I think) old... would it do this when backing up (TimeMachine) when I haven't done that in a month or so?
    Anyone have any insight on this?

    Start with http://developer.apple.com/mac/library/documentation/Security/Conceptual/CodeSig ningGuide/Introduction/Introduction.html

  • Signing Error

    Ok ,  gave up on Digital pass a year ago , thought i would give it another go tonight . very frustrating to go through all the steps to get a signing error.  Can not believe you still havent managed to make a simple website that alows hassle free viewing of NRL .  i have cancelled my subscription within 5 minutes of making it.  If you charge my account i will not be happy.   

    I have see Tim (Telstra) post in other threads about some issues they are aware of tonight that are being worked on.
    Unfortunately no complex technical system can be fault free 100% of the time.

Maybe you are looking for