Page 0 Authorization Inheritance

According to the text displayed on Page 0, it says "Page 0 components will be rendered on every page." I would think that this would include the authorization (so it could be inherited), but I created an authorization scheme called IsRegisteredMember, and set the Authorization on page 0 to use this scheme. Then on page 1, the authorization is set to "-No Page Authorization Required-". Then when I try to access Page 1, I would think that since page 0 is being executed also, that the authorization on page 0 would be executed too, but instead, the No Page Auth from page 1 is instead run and the user is allowed to access the page.
Is this a bug?
I was trying to use page 0 so that I didn't have to set the authorization on every page of my application. I was hoping that each page would inherit its authorization from page 0.
Can someone explain?
Thanks,
Kris

Hi ,
You can always make your Authorization scheme query to run for certain page by adding APP_PAGE_ID as a condition to the query. Like
IF :APP_PAGE_ID != '101' THEN
--logic to check for security
end if;
Or you can put it in the existing where clause as
WHERE :APP_PAGE_ID != '101'Thanks,
Manish

Similar Messages

SharePoint 2013 - Missing Publishing Page Ribbon/Tab on custom page layout - Page language="C#" Inherits="Microsoft.SharePoint.Publishing.PublishingLayoutPage,.... VS CodeBehind="BlogDemo.aspx.cs" Inherits="DemoProject.Branding.BlogDemo"

I created page layouts using Visual Studio 2013 and SharePoint 2013. I added both ASP.NET web controls (e.g. asp:Label, asp:HyperLink) and SharePoint web controls (e.g. SharePointWebControls:UrlField) in a page layout.
However, when I deployed the solution, I cannot edit all the ASP.NET & SharePoint web controls (column fields from custom content type used for the page layout) except the web part zones.
Then I found out about inherits property:
1) if I use the code for the page layout as shown below:
<%@ Page Language="C#" AutoEventWireup="true" CodeBehind="BlogDemo.aspx.cs"
Inherits="DemoProject.Branding.BlogDemo" MasterPageFile="/_catalogs/masterpage/DemoProject/DemoMasterPage.master"
%>
Result: There is no publishing ribbon/tab. E.g. Edit, Publish..... although both ASP.NET & SharePoint web controls can be displayed on the page layout.
Screenshot:
2) if I use the code instead as shown below:
<%@ Page language="C#" Inherits="Microsoft.SharePoint.Publishing.PublishingLayoutPage,Microsoft.SharePoint.Publishing,Version=15.0.0.0,Culture=neutral,PublicKeyToken=71e9bce111e9429c"
meta:progid="SharePoint.WebPartPage.Document" %>
Result: Publishing ribbon/tab is available, but ASP.NET web controls won't appear. Only SharePoint web controls appear on the page layout.
Screenshot:
I wonder how I can combine both codes to ensure that the page layout can have publishing ribbon/tab and displays both ASP.NET & SharePoint web controls.

Found a way to solve the issue
I follow the solution:
http://pinnacleofindiana.com/blog/developers/2012/03/28/creating-a-sharepoint-2010-page-layout-with-code-behind/
http://blogs.msdn.com/b/kaevans/archive/2011/04/02/code-behind-page-layouts-with-visual-studio-2010.aspx

"Create PDF from Web Page" Yields Authorization Failure

Acrobat 9 Pro Extended running on Windows XP Service Pack 3:
When using "Create PDF from Web Page," certain linked pages result in an "Authorization Failure" error message. Is there any way to instruct Acrobat to disregard pages that are not downloadable and continue creating the PDF?

I am having the same issue AND none of my pages or files require a UserID or Password. My issue appears to be something with the domain because a and b work just fine and produce a PDF file while item c does not work and produces the error msg.
http://www.dot.wi.gov/projects/neregion/151/index.htm works just fine and produces a PDF file.
http://www.dot.state.wi.us/projects/neregion/151/index.htm works just fine and produces a PDF file.
http://www.wisconsindot.gov/projects/neregion/151/index.htm produces an error msg. ‘Nothing done’.Error info. - Authorization Failure http://www.wisconsindot.gov/projects/neregion/151/index.htm
[email protected]

Page Restriction - Authorization Scheme

I have an application 8736 this application as 3 tabs
TAB1: information TAB2: department   TAB3: Admin
TAB3 as a form in which SHOULD be only be view by users which authorisation rights. I have been trying to do this for sometimes now and it is not work. I have a table called users
TABLE:users
username    access_level
john919             2
sarah765           0
For the page in TAB3 if you have an access level of 2. You should be able to view this page and if not they you should get an error message saying "sorry you cant view this page".
In this case "john919" should be able to view the page in tab "Tab3" and "sarah765 " SHOULD NOT.
I have this query in the Authorization Scheme and the scheme type: pl/sql function returning boolean
DECLARE
   v_access_level   NUMBER (2);
BEGIN
   IF (:APP_PAGE_ID = 61)
   THEN
      SELECT MAX (ADMIN_LEVEL)
        INTO v_access_level
        FROM USERS
       WHERE USER_NAME = :APP_USER;
      IF v_access_level = 2
      THEN
         RETURN TRUE;
      ELSE
         RETURN FALSE;
      END IF;
   ELSE
      RETURN TRUE;
   END IF;
END
I have never try this before and I have being asking around and alot of people tell me this should check the admin_level in the USERS table using the current username of the person looking in to see if they have access to this page. SO far this is as fail me. Please help

If you only have one access level per user then try changing your authorization scheme code to
DECLARE
   v_access_level   NUMBER (2);
BEGIN
      SELECT ADMIN_LEVEL
        INTO v_access_level
        FROM USERS
       WHERE USER_NAME = :APP_USER;
      IF v_access_level = 2
      THEN
         RETURN TRUE;
      ELSE
         RETURN FALSE;
      END IF;
END;
now apply this scheme to tab3

Authorization inheritance in cFolders

Hi !
Is there any way of over-riding the inheritence of authorization in cFolders? In cFolders a lower level element automatically inherits the authorization matrix of the higher level element and I want to prevent this from happening.
Lets say for example I have a folder A with 15 documents inside it. A user User 1 has got read authorization in folder A and so by default he has read authorization in all the documents in the folder. Now suppose I want to restrict his view to only 8 documents out of 15 I'll have to manually set the authorization to none in the rest of the documents. However if a new document gets created in thefolder then the default authorization for that document is read for user 1 as it inherits the authorization matrix of folder A. I want to prevent it from happening.
Any ideas?
Regards,
Debaranjan Hazarika.

Hi Lashan,
1- the definition of auth. object CXF_APPL is following:
This authorization object is for the cFolders application. If a user has authorization for this authorization object, he or she can make administrative settings.
You can use the following field values (for APPL_AREA):
- 'Network_Definition': Setting up the network, for example, absolute URL or FTP server settings
- 'Content_Definition': Setting up cFolders content, for example, adding generic objects; choosing scenarios to use
- 'Layout_Definition': Setting up the cFolders layout, for example, style sheets
The permitted activites are: 02 Change and 03 Display.
2- The definition of CFX_USER is as follows:
This authorization object is for the cFolders application. This authorization object must be assigned to the user who wants to use cFolders.
The user needs the following field value to use cFolders:
USER_TYPE = User (no other values exist)
I hope this answers your question.
Regards,
Silvia

Since I am using this on my work computer, my landing page requires authorization. Firefox prompts me for it, but evertime it fails and asks for it again,

Everytime I open Firefox, I am prompted to give the same login credentials I do with Windows Explorer, as this provides access to our intranet. I fill out the information correctly, press enter, and it immediately "refreshes," meaning it clears he info i just entered and prompts me again. I need this issue resolved asap!!

Are you allowed to "trust" the site? Are the credentials the same ones under which are are already logged in? If so, try this:
(1) In a new tab, type or paste '''about:config''' in the address bar and press Enter. Click the button promising to be careful.
(2) In the filter box, type or paste '''ntlm''' and pause while the list is filtered
(3) Double-click '''network.automatic-ntlm-auth.trusted-uris''' to open a dialog for editing. If this value is blank, enter the host name. For example, if the address is http://our-intranet/dir/page.aspx then enter our-intranet (no protocol, no slashes). If this value is not blank, add a comma and then the new host name.
Any luck? (I've heard it doesn't work on all AD/server configurations, but it's worth a try.)

Page Authorization Scheme OK button not working

Hi All,
I have a Page Level Authorization scheme, which makes a PL/SQL Function call to determine whether the logged in user should have access to the Page. This works well and displays an 'Access denied by Page security check' error message, but the OK Hyperlink that is displayed does not work as I would expect as I am not returned to the calling page.
The pages in question are Popups and when I hover over the OK Hyperlink, the Javascript in the Taskbar shows javascript:window.history.go(-1). Is this the route of my problem, and is there any way around this when using Popup windows?
Thanks,
Mike

Scott,
Thanks for your response. Yes you have the sequence right: "User clicks on link to popup page from base page and the link is to a forbidden page"
"The basic question is why would you ever show a link to a forbidden page to the user?"
The main reason is time, ideally yes we would like to hide links to forbidden pages but it will take time to implement due to complexity of role combinations and number of pages. So for now, we are confident in our method for denying access to forbidden pages.
The error message that is displayed on the forbidden page is set in the Authorization Scheme, but how do I alter the OK link? Isn't this generated 'behind the scenes'?
Thanks,
Mike

How can I create a Splash / Welcome Page before the home page

I'm trying to create a splash page to inform our users about some changes to the site before they enter the site. I created a new page in the top menu by clicking the left X of the home / index page, which is the result that wanted. But when I click on site properties of this new splash page it has inherited the "index.html" filename and when I export the HTML my home page is now named "index1.html."
I'm concerned about the effects this will have on our SEO and analytics, so I was wondering if there was a work around for this. Basically I'm looking to have the Splash page with the new information be the first thing visitors see with a button that allows them to enter the main site sfter they've read the information. But I don't want to compromise the page structure by adding another index page or renaming the existing index page.
Is this possible? Or can someone suggest a way to accomplish this in MUSE?

CRESDesigner wrote:
...Is this possible?...
Not quite, if you are concerned about SEO. Introductory or 'splash' pages are terrible for this and can hurt your search results even after you pull the splash page down. In regard to SEO, we already shoot ourselves in the foot by using Muse. Be careful about compounding this with a splash page.
Ideally, your web site would check for the existence of a cookie that identifies if the visitor has seen the alert. If the cookie is not present, a DIV overlay would be presented with your alert. Once that alert is presented, the cookie would be written to prevent further display of the alert. You could achieve this in any other web design program (or text editor) today, or you can submit a feature request and wait for Muse to offer this functionality in months/years.

Editing error pages?

hi all,
i was just curious if it's possible to change the layout of error pages like the one we get when authorization scheme returns false. also, when we get a page not found error
Edited:
also, instead of getting the error page for authorization failure, is it possible to just redirect the user to the login page or maybe just kill the session?
thanks.
allen
Message was edited by:
A.Sandiego

You can look at the error page template used by the application (a section of the default page template) and you can make changes to that.
You can also redirect to any page from within any PL/SQL in your application, including authorization schemes, page processes, etc. Sometimes you need to do this first:
apex_application.g_unrecoverable_error := true;
...after which you can use owa_util.redirect_url.
...just kill the session?
The only action you can take that would do that (whatever it means) is to go through the application's logout URL which will unset the session cookie. It will also remove the session from the internal sessions table when the application is run outside the development environment (by end users, for example).
Scott

Create a page as a copy does not work properly

Hi,
When I create a new page as a copy of an existing page with page authorization set to some authorization scheme, the newly created page does not work. When I edit the page definition, "Authorization Scheme" is set to some random number instead of the scheme that was set in the original page and running the page throws an error. Any buttons or items set with an authorization also throws an error. Is this a bug?
Thanks,
Machaan

Hi Patrick,
I am using APEX version 4.0.1.00.03 on Oracle 11g.
I tried to reproduce it on apex.oracle.com and was not able to reproduce it. The new page worked fine.
In my application, the newly created page works fine and is not generating an error, but the authorization scheme is set to a number instead of a defined authorization scheme.
Thanks,
Machaan
Edited by: Machaan on Nov 12, 2010 2:07 PM

Spry in the realm with access authorization

I wonder if someone had a same problem?
I have a realm on my server to keep pages required
authorization for accessing them. It works perfect with everything
but the pages containing Spry. If I move them out of the realm they
work OK, move into - they don't.
I am using Mac OS X 10.4.9.
Many thanks for advice in advance.

I found another interesting feature! If I move .xml file
which contains a dataset for my spry widget out of the realm to the
unprotected area and access them from there that everything is
OK.

APEX Pages - User Access List with NTLM

Hi,
I'm building several APEX Applications, and using NTLM as its Authentication Scheme. With this, the users won't have to type any user and password. And their user name stated in top right screen.
I'd like to build another application to administer users of all created APEX Applications. So I'd like to build 3 tables:
1. users (hold user name, and user data)
2. pages (hold APEX Applications pages)
3. access_list (hold combined data of users and pages and access flag)
The last table will give me an SQL that can be used to create page level Authorization Scheme.
The problem is:
I cannot find a way to get a list of user ids to pre-populated the table users. Is there a way that an administrator user use an LOV of all NTLM user instead of typing domain\user to this application? OR is there a better and elegant way to create User Access List with NTLM.
Your helps will really help me, and thanks in advance.
Regards,
Aulia

This is kind of a followup to Scott's post. Instead of using your own tables to map user accounts to permissions etc, why not simply use LDAP to query the NT domain global catalog?
You can tell what users are members of particular AD groups and control access to functions based on AD group membership. Then you would only need one table that maps Apex functionality to AD groups.
That's what we do. Our account management people add users to different security groups and they get access to our apex app based on those groups. The type of access is controlled by the group to which they belong.
If you try to capture a list of all users, you'll be constantly trying to keep your list of users in sync with your AD/NTLM accounts.
Or I guess you could simply use LDAP queries inside the database to get a list of ALL your users in a nightly batch. Wouldn't help for people added in the middle of the day, but maybe that doesn't happen often in your company.
I have posted code on using Active Directory LDAP with dbms_ldap inside the database. Shouldn't be too much trouble to modify that code to scan your directory for users every night. Search for "dbms_ldap" in this forum.

How to attach a default master page to a aspx site page ?

Hi
I make a aspx file in the sharepoint designer 2013, and I place a hyperlink inside the form.
It do well
Then I try to attach a master page.
In the sharepoint designer menu I click at the style button, then click at the attach button and select
the default master page "oslo"
But when I open the site in the internet browser, the site comes with an error.
Below here is the code before and after attaching the master page
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd">
<%@ Page Language="C#" %>
<%@ Register tagprefix="SharePoint" namespace="Microsoft.SharePoint.WebControls" assembly="Microsoft.SharePoint, Version=15.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=71e9bce111e9429c" %>
<html dir="ltr" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head runat="server">
<meta name="WebPartPageExpansion" content="full" />
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" />
<title>Untitled 2</title>
<meta http-equiv="X-UA-Compatible" content="IE=10" />
<SharePoint:CssRegistration Name="default" runat="server"/>
</head>
<body>
<form id="form1" runat="server">
<asp:HyperLink runat="server" id="HyperLink1">HyperLink</asp:HyperLink>
</form>
</body>
</html>
%@ Page Language="C#" masterpagefile="~masterurl/custom.master" title="Untitled 2" inherits="Microsoft.SharePoint.WebPartPages.WebPartPage, Microsoft.SharePoint, Version=15.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=71e9bce111e9429c"
meta:webpartpageexpansion="full" meta:progid="SharePoint.WebPartPage.Document" %>
<%@ Register tagprefix="SharePoint" namespace="Microsoft.SharePoint.WebControls" assembly="Microsoft.SharePoint, Version=15.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=71e9bce111e9429c" %>
<asp:Content id="Content1" runat="Server" contentplaceholderid="PlaceHolderUtilityContent">
<form id="form1" runat="server">
<asp:HyperLink runat="server" id="HyperLink1">HyperLink</asp:HyperLink>
</form>
</asp:Content>

Hi,
According to your post, an error occurred when you added the master page to a aspx site page.
Please do as follows:
1. Use "~sitecollection/_catalogs/masterpage/custom.master" instead of "~masterurl/custom.master" .
2. Remove the form tag.
Code:
<%@ Page Language="C#" Inherits="Microsoft.SharePoint.WebPartPages.WikiEditPage" MasterPageFile="~sitecollection/_catalogs/masterpage/custom.master" MainContentID="PlaceHolderMain" meta:webpartpageexpansion="full" meta:progid="SharePoint.WebPartPage.Document" %>
<%@ Register Tagprefix="SharePoint" Namespace="Microsoft.SharePoint.WebControls" Assembly="Microsoft.SharePoint, Version=15.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=71e9bce111e9429c" %>
<asp:Content ContentPlaceHolderId="PlaceHolderMain" runat="server">
<asp:HyperLink runat="server" id="HyperLink1">HyperLink</asp:HyperLink>
</asp:Content>
Best Regards
Dennis Guo
TechNet Community Support

Authorization scheme (using {not} Scheme)

I have build a change password page and every user, except user with a Guest role (= GUEST SCHEME) have access to that page.
I defined a scheme GUEST for users with the GUEST role. When I define the page with Authorization scheme {not}GUEST this isn't working everyone has access to the page, also the guest users.
am I misunderstanding the {not}scheme choice or is something else wrong.
Fred.

Fred,
I have solved it with the work around I mentioned before:I read what you said very carefully but thought it reckless to conclude that the workaround was successful because you just said "To work around the problem, I did xyz" without indicating the outcome.
The authorization schemes on navigation tabs fire also on the default login pageYes they do, they fire on every page whether or not the page template accommodates a navigation bar. This looks like a bug to me.
Is there a "authorization scheme report" which shows all the objects where the authorization scheme is defined.Shared Components > Authorization Schemes > Utilization (slightly different in each version).
Scott

Adding new page in WebTools 2007

How can I create my own page in webtools 2007 that will inherit the theme? I was able to do this in 596 using the sample below but this doesn't work in WT. Am I inheriting from the wrong class now?
<%@ Import Namespace="netpoint.classes" %>
<%@ Page language="c#" Inherits="netpoint.classes.NPBasePage" %>
<form id="Form1" method="post" runat="server">
<h1>My Custom Content</h1>
</form>
Thanks,
Steve

Nevermind, I figured it out. This is how it looks now:
<%@ Import Namespace="netpoint.classes" %>
<%@ Page language="c#" MasterPageFile="~/masters/common.master" Inherits="netpoint.classes.NPBasePage" %>
<asp:Content ContentPlaceHolderID="mainslot" runat="server" ID="main">
<h1>My Custom Content</h1>
</asp:Content>

Page 0 Authorization Inheritance

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for