Parent & Child Numbering

Hey all- I'm trying to make a list like this:
1.
2.a.
2.b.
3.
4.
etc...
But what I get instead is:
1.
1.a.
2.
or
1.
a.
2.
etc..
I have tried everything. Is there no way to do this type of automatic lettering in Pages 2.0.2? It seems like an obvious choice to include.
Thanks in advance.
-jshep4
17'Macbook Pro Mac OS X (10.4.8)
17'Macbook Pro Mac OS X (10.4.8)

Hello jshep4
Welcome to the discussions!
I don't think you can get precisely what you want. The ' tiered numbers' at each indent level have to be the same so the closest you can come is:
1.
2.
2.a. Paragraph at indent level 2
2.b. Paragaph at indent level 2
3.
I don't believe that there is a way to get 2.a and 2.b without having the 2 at indent level 1 before it.

Similar Messages

Parent Child Hierarchy causes numbers to be different

Hello,
We have a parent child hierarchy in our chart of account dimensions. When the hierarchy is included in an analysis, the numbers are correct. If the hierarchy is not included in the analysis and a column from the dimension with the hierarchy is included, the numbers are very different. They are overstated by a large amount.
For Example, I have two analysis:
-In the first analysis the hierarchy is included and the grand total is 2,383,080,784.
-The second analysis has simply excluded the hierarchy from the analysis and the total shoots all the way up to 6,901,729,527.
I have screen shots but don't know how to include them in this kind of a post.
Has anybody else seen such behavior? This seems like it would be a big deal so either we are doing something wrong or this is a bug that needs fixed.
We are on 11.1.1.6
Thanks in advance,
Brian

Hi,
Thanks for the reply, I'm actually using snapshots. But even with the Type 2 Dim I don't think it will work.
When OBIEE generates the very first sql against the Parent-Child table the fact table is not included in the query. It seems to create 2 queries - one to find the top level parent (ancestor key is null) and then one to find all the leaf nodes.
It does not have any join to the fact table when it does this. So if you have multiple rows in the table (with date stamps) for a single row (person in this case) - it picks up both rows. Therefore, when you have a person who was, say, promoted to manager, and WAS a leaf node, and is now a manager, they show up in the leaf query and don't display in the hierarchy as a manager.
Once it has the leaf nodes and it joins to the fact table everything works (ie the surrogate key join).
I'm trying to figure out if there is any way to influence those initial queries against the parent-child table.
Hopefully that made sense.
Thanks,
Tori

Changing into parent-child relation

Hi,
I have a table which has the following fields and the table gives the identifier for parent-child relation:
ID
PARENT ID
structure
parentkey_field
foreignkey_field
Fields[]
data[]
1.ID is the numbering like 1,2,3...
2.PARENT ID will give the relation like which structure is the child for which structure.
Example: I have two structures HEADER and ITEM.Then the IDs will be 1 and 2.The parent id for ITEM will be 1(ID OF HEADER).
3.Structure is the header/item structure names.
4.parentkey_field and foreignkey_field are defining the header-child relation identifier fields.
5.fields[] is the table with all the fields of header and item.
6.DATA[] is the table having the data of header/item fields.
Now my requirement is to flatten this table into one more table(with field structure_name,fieldname,value) with parent-child relation.
Can anyone suggest something.

It would be better if you posted the code you tried first and then having others help you with what's wrong. Flattening a hierarchy is not that difficult; why don't you give it a shot first?

Graphs and parent-child with loops and duplicates

There is a parent-child relation in the table t(prnt, chld) which allows duplicates (A->B, A->B) and opposite paths (A->B, B->A), and complicated loops. Is there a way to identify rows that form any separate "connections network" and assign a "name" to them of any kind (letter, number, wahtever)? I try to use WITH recursive clause to identify and group rows belonging to one graph but with no luck. Any help would be appreciated.
thank you

Frank, I posted inputs for all graphs (multiple inserts) and some allowable outputs for one graph. For all cases (ie. graphs) the rule is the same:
1. identify all nodes belonging to a graph
2. "name" that graph (min, max or whatever you like)
3. print the output in the form (node_belonging_to_a_graph, name_of_the_graph) for all identified graphs
And as you said, I am somewhat flexible. I don't want to constrain the problem with saying min, max because it's not important how you name it, but the way which is somehow natural and fits with requirements is the usage of nodes' values.
You ask me if (1,1),(2,1),(3,1) is also OK as an output for sample graph (1,2)+(2,3). Yes it is. It is one of those I posted but with additional node which is chosen as a name for a graph. But as you can guess it doesn't matter which node you choose, and the additional information about a node named with its own name is not as important and the information that all other nodes are named with that name but it is 100% acceptable. If you changed the naming convention and started to use letters instead of node values then yes, it would be a must to have the output in the form (1,a),(2,a),(3,a).
You also ask me about the result for 90x data inserted as 5 rows: (901,902)..(906,904) and present sample result:
901 902
905 902
906 902
And the answer is no, it is not good result. It misses the information about the nodes 904 and 903 which belong to this graph too. The correct result could be:
901 902
905 902
906 902
903 902
904 902
or any other "combination" which presents 5 nodes with the name of the sixth (in this case of 6-node graph). Just one have to be picked, it doesn't matter which one. The "vertical" order is also irrelevant.
As you can see there is a lot of room that gives acceptable result. I don't want to constraint it because it can influence performance which is important when dealing with graph structures in relational databases (RDBMS are not predestined to easily cope with that sort of information). It can also influence the chosen algorithm and I'd like to pick the fastest one which gives acceptable result.
Two numbers x and y are in the same group (graph) if (and only if) at least one of the following is true:
(1) they appear on the same row together (it doesn't matter which number is in which of the 2 columns), or
--(2) x appears on the same row with a third number, z, and z is in the same group as y--
(2) there are other edges (entries) in the table that form a "path" from x to y. And because the direction of the path is not important for the problem (ie. the parent-child table structure can be forgotten for a moment), the path means "there exists connection" between x and y aka "you can walk from x to y".
The output consists of 2 columns: id (which is unique in the result set) and grp (which identifies the group) *[correct]*
The id column will always be one of the numbers in the group *[correct]*
It doesn't matter what the grp column is, or even what data type, as long as it distinguishes between the different groups. *[correct, but as you noted using one, picked number from a graph is the prefferable way]*
If there are N distinct numbers in the group, I need N rows of output for that group, with id showing all those distinct numbers. *[correct, but if you choose your naming convention as naming a graph with the value of the node belonging to it you can ommit the node which is named for itself (but it doesn't hurt is such row appear in the result)]*
You ask me if the graph is directed. No it's not. Your example (x,y) and (y,x) is great, and it can be concluded from my first post when I say that "opposite paths" (A->B, B->A) exists. What matters is the connection between the nodes. The parent-child table somehow imposes that direction is important, but for this problem it is not.
One of the motivations for my post is to know what other people think without affecting their minds with my approach. I don't want to skew anybody's mind into my solution which works, but it's not effective. I don't mind showing it but I kindly ask you to think about the problem before I post it. Diversity of approaches helps to distill the best one.
As I said I did it with the usage of sys_connect_by_path. If it doesn't appear to you as possible usage then it is likely that I don't use it efficiently. Please understand, I will post it if you ask me one more time but if you can live for a while without my inefficient solution and suggest something with WITH clause I would appreciate it.
There is no exact result I expect. There are many results which are correct and acceptable. They all must follow the rules described at the beginning.
Thank you
Edited by: 943276 on Jun 28, 2012 1:32 AM

Parent-Child Hierarchy in Informatica

Can anyone please tell me the solution for the below scenario in Informatica. I have seen this scenario in folkstalk.com Take a look at the following tree structure diagram. From the tree structure, you can easily derive the parent-child relationship between the elements. For example, B is parent of D and E. The above tree structure data is represented in a table as shown below. SOURCE TABLE: C1C2C3C4ABDHABDIABENULLACFNULLACGNULL Here in this table, column C1 is parent of column C2, column C2 is parent of column C3, column C3 is parent of column C4. Design a mapping to load the target table with the below data. Here you need to generate sequence numbers for each element and then you have to get the parent id. As the element "A" is at root, it does not have any parent and its parent_id is NULL. TARGET TABLE Seq_IDELEMENTParent_ID 1 A NULL 2 B 1 3 C 1 4 D 2 5 E 2 6 F 3 7 G 3 8 H 4 9 I 4 Both Source and Target are Oracle tables.Please help me how to acheive this in Informatica.

AA선릉야구장 역삼풀싸롱 OlO 4314 6363 강북풀싸롱, 명동풀살롱MM명동룸싸롱위치+가격++문의 한예슬실장 BEST EVENT로 화끈하게!~ AA선릉야구장 역삼풀싸롱 OlO 4314 6363 강북풀싸롱, 명동풀살롱MM명동룸싸롱위치+가격++문의 한예슬실장 BEST EVENT로 화끈하게!~ AA선릉야구장 역삼풀싸롱 OlO 4314 6363 강북풀싸롱, 명동풀살롱MM명동룸싸롱위치+가격++문의 한예슬실장 BEST EVENT로 화끈하게!~ AA선릉야구장 역삼풀싸롱 OlO 4314 6363 강북풀싸롱, 명동풀살롱MM명동룸싸롱위치+가격++문의 한예슬실장 BEST EVENT로 화끈하게!~ AA선릉야구장 역삼풀싸롱 OlO 4314 6363 강북풀싸롱, 명동풀살롱MM명동룸싸롱위치+가격++문의 한예슬실장 BEST EVENT로 화끈하게!~ AA선릉야구장 역삼풀싸롱 OlO 4314 6363 강북풀싸롱, 명동풀살롱MM명동룸싸롱위치+가격++문의 한예슬실장 BEST EVENT로 화끈하게!~ AA선릉야구장 역삼풀싸롱 OlO 4314 6363 강북풀싸롱, 명동풀살롱MM명동룸싸롱위치+가격++문의 한예슬실장 BEST EVENT로 화끈하게!~ AA선릉야구장 역삼풀싸롱 OlO 4314 6363 강북풀싸롱, 명동풀살롱MM명동룸싸롱위치+가격++문의 한예슬실장 BEST EVENT로 화끈하게!~ AA선릉야구장 역삼풀싸롱 OlO 4314 6363 강북풀싸롱, 명동풀살롱MM명동룸싸롱위치+가격++문의 한예슬실장 BEST EVENT로 화끈하게!~ AA선릉야구장 역삼풀싸롱 OlO 4314 6363 강북풀싸롱, 명동풀살롱MM명동룸싸롱위치+가격++문의 한예슬실장 BEST EVENT로 화끈하게!~ AA선릉야구장 역삼풀싸롱 OlO 4314 6363 강북풀싸롱, 명동풀살롱MM명동룸싸롱위치+가격++문의 한예슬실장 BEST EVENT로 화끈하게!~ AA선릉야구장 역삼풀싸롱 OlO 4314 6363 강북풀싸롱, 명동풀살롱MM명동룸싸롱위치+가격++문의 한예슬실장 BEST EVENT로 화끈하게!~ AA선릉야구장 역삼풀싸롱 OlO 4314 6363 강북풀싸롱, 명동풀살롱MM명동룸싸롱위치+가격++문의 한예슬실장 BEST EVENT로 화끈하게!~ AA선릉야구장 역삼풀싸롱 OlO 4314 6363 강북풀싸롱, 명동풀살롱MM명동룸싸롱위치+가격++문의 한예슬실장 BEST EVENT로 화끈하게!~ AA선릉야구장 역삼풀싸롱 OlO 4314 6363 강북풀싸롱, 명동풀살롱MM명동룸싸롱위치+가격++문의 한예슬실장 BEST EVENT로 화끈하게!~ AA선릉야구장 역삼풀싸롱 OlO 4314 6363 강북풀싸롱, 명동풀살롱MM명동룸싸롱위치+가격++문의 한예슬실장 BEST EVENT로 화끈하게!~ AA선릉야구장 역삼풀싸롱 OlO 4314 6363 강북풀싸롱, 명동풀살롱MM명동룸싸롱위치+가격++문의 한예슬실장 BEST EVENT로 화끈하게!~ AA선릉야구장 역삼풀싸롱 OlO 4314 6363 강북풀싸롱, 명동풀살롱MM명동룸싸롱위치+가격++문의 한예슬실장 BEST EVENT로 화끈하게!~ AA선릉야구장 역삼풀싸롱 OlO 4314 6363 강북풀싸롱, 명동풀살롱MM명동룸싸롱위치+가격++문의 한예슬실장 BEST EVENT로 화끈하게!~

Parent/Child "itemkey"

I have a parent/child relatonship between 2 tables. Both tables have dataless keys (both just populated by different sequence numbers starting at 1). I want to create Parent and Child processes (in the same workflow itemtype) to represent the records in the application tables.
What should the "itemkey" be for the child process? (I can't have the same "itemkey" as the parent record).
-- using the Oracle demo Survey workflow names:
begin
-- PK of parent record=1
wf_engine.CreateProcess(ItemType => 'WFSURV',
                    ItemKey => to_char(1),
                    process => 'SURVEY2');
-- PK of child record=1
wf_engine.CreateProcess(ItemType => 'WFSURV',
                    ItemKey => to_char(1),
                    process => 'CHILDSURVEY');
end;
ORA-20002: 3122: Duplicate item 'WFSURV/1' could not be created.
ORA-06512: at "OWF_MGR.WF_ENGINE", line 3000
ORA-06512: at line 5
Can I build up my child "itemkey" by having {PK of parentrec}||'-'||{PK of childrec} to ensure that it wont conflict with the "itemkey" for the parentprocess?
e.g.
begin
wf_engine.CreateProcess(ItemType => 'WFSURV',
                    ItemKey => to_char(1),
                    process => 'SURVEY2');
wf_engine.CreateProcess(ItemType => 'WFSURV',
                    ItemKey => to_char(1)||'-'||to_char(1),
                    process => 'CHILDSURVEY');
end;
I'd like to implement this as cleanly as possible. Any suggestions welcome.

You could just prefix each item key with the process name or some other distinguishing string -
'SURVEY2:' || {PK of parent table}
'CHILDSURVEY:' || (PK of child table)
or
'P' || {PK of parent table}
'C' || (PK of child table)

Customer Master -- Parent + Child Relationship

Hi
I have an requirement from user asking me to set Parent -Child relationship for a customer.
Correct me if i am wrong.
I have customer numbers 1000 and 2000.
In "payment transactions" tab , i have included 2000 in "Alternat. Payer" field. So now 2000 will be the alternative payer for 1000 customer.
I want to see this relationship in FBL5N. In what way should i ensure that the functionality is maintained.
Please let me know
Thanks
Rajanikanth.

Please note I do not respond direct through e mail, only on this forum.
If the customer has not been set up correctly there will not be any entries in the branch field.
As mentioned you need to have the parent customer number set as the "payer " partner function in the child's customer account number.
This will mean you are selling to the chil, but the parent is paying, and this is where the invoice will go to.
If you have not set the master data up like this, then there will not be any values there for you.
Please award points if this is helpful and has been helpful so far.

Query Help with Parent, Child, Child's Child

Hi all,
Need some help with a query. I'm trying to create a stored procedure that is sort of like a Customer, Order, Order, Details. In my situation the tables are different but nevertheless, I want to grab all the fields from the Parent, Child,
and Childs' Child, where the Parent.ParentID = @Parameter. I tried this:
CREATE PROCEDURE [dbo].[spGetCompleteProjectXML]
@ProjectID int = 0
AS
SELECT *,
(SELECT *,
(SELECT *
FROM PageControls
WHERE (PageControls.ProjectPageID = ProjectPages.ProjectPageID))
FROM ProjectPages
WHERE (ProjectPages.ProjectID = @ProjectID))
FROM Projects
WHERE (ProjectID = @ProjectID)
FOR XML AUTO, ELEMENTS
RETURN 0
I think I'm close, but it was my best effort. Could someone help?
thanks in advance

Hi TPolo,
Regarding your description, are you looking for a sample like below?
CREATE TABLE customer(customerID INT, name VARCHAR(99))
INSERT INTO customer VALUES(1,'Eric')
INSERT INTO customer VALUES(2,'Nelson')
CREATE TABLE orders(orderID INT,customerID INT)
INSERT INTO orders VALUES(1,1);
INSERT INTO orders VALUES(2,1)
INSERT INTO orders VALUES(3,2)
INSERT INTO orders VALUES(4,2)
CREATE TABLE orderDetails(orderID INT,item VARCHAR(99))
INSERT INTO orderDetails VALUES(1,'APPLE1')
INSERT INTO orderDetails VALUES(1,'BANANA1')
INSERT INTO orderDetails VALUES(2,'APPLE2')
INSERT INTO orderDetails VALUES(2,'BANANA2')
INSERT INTO orderDetails VALUES(3,'APPLE3')
INSERT INTO orderDetails VALUES(3,'BANANA3')
INSERT INTO orderDetails VALUES(4,'APPLE4')
INSERT INTO orderDetails VALUES(4,'BANANA5')
SELECT customer.customerID,customer.name,
(SELECT orderId,
SELECT item FROM orderDetails WHERE orderID=orders.orderID FOR XML AUTO,TYPE,ELEMENTS
FROM orders Where customerID=customer.customerID FOR XML AUTO,TYPE,ELEMENTS)
FROM customer WHERE customerID=1
FOR XML AUTO,ELEMENTS
DROP TABLE customer,orderDetails,orders
If you have any feedback on our support, please click
here.
Eric Zhang
TechNet Community Support

Problem with saving Parent - Child View Objects in ADF 11g.

Hi Every one,
I have a requirment, something like I will be displaying some data on my jsff screen based on one Transient View Object. Whenever user clicks on Save button, I have to do following steps in my AMImpl.
-> Preapre dynamically Parent View Object Rows based on some logic
-> Prepare dynamically Child View object Rows and invoke insertRow method on respective child view object.
When I say commit() First Parent ViewObject data need to be saved and then Child View object data has to be saved. I am having Parent - Child Key relation ship btw these two ViewObjects. Some how I am populating the Parent Primary key in the Child View Object. Please suggest me If there is any other alternative to this.
Thanks

I got the solution, Enabling the check box option for Master - Detail Entity association (CompositionAssociation -> Cascade Update Key Attributes) resolved the issue.
Thanks

Does table STPOX contain parent-child relationship between components

Hello
I need to get a list of components of SO BOM.
FM CS_BOM_EXPL_KND_V1 exports an output table STPOX.
Does this table contain parent-child relationship between components? If yes , can somebody tell me which fields contain parent child id.
thanks

Hi,
STPOX is not a table, it is a structure & hence there is no storing of data in a structure. The table which stores this info is STPO.
To get the link you can refer to STPO-STLNR & pass this value to MAST-STLNR, this way you can link the child with its parent.
Regards,
Vivek

How to allow Sharepoint users to login from multiple parent-child accounts?

Our client has mutliple AD domains and wants to allow people which have multiple AD accounts in multiple domains to login as THE SAME user:
- only primary account will be visible in search
- there will be only one user profile with all informations gathered from all sub accounts
- permissions for the sub account will be in sync with parent account
- task generated for parent will be visible for child accouns too etc
- ad admin can link the account together in the Active Directory - this link is permament (even if we move users to another OU) and ad admin can define which account is primary and secondary (parent/child)
How we can implement this in Sharepoint 2010 Std Server?

Everything in SharePoint keys of the Security Identifier (SID) of a user. Each user in a domain has a unique SID, so there is no way to have multiple users recognized in SharePoint as the same user.
Paul Stork SharePoint Server MVP
Principal Architect: Blue Chip Consulting Group
Blog: http://dontpapanic.com/blog
Twitter: Follow @pstork
Please remember to mark your question as "answered" if this solves your problem.

Getting parent-child data from a single column in a table

Hi,
I have a parent-child data in a column.
Eg:
0
00
01
010
011
1
10
11
These values are present in the single column itself. My need is to get the parent values for the given child value.
For eg: If I am giving the input as 011, the query should return all its parents, i.e. 01 and 0
Could you please give me any inputs on this?
Thanks,
GV

Frank Kulash wrote:
Assuming that each child's id is formed by adding exactly one character to the end of its parent's id:
SELECT     id
FROM     table_x
START WITH     id          = :target_id
CONNECT BY     PRIOR id     LIKE id || '_';
Small tweak to yours Frank if it's just the parents that need identifying...
SQL> ed
Wrote file afiedt.buf
1 with t as (select '0' as x from dual union all
2             select '00' from dual union all
3             select '01' from dual union all
4             select '010' from dual union all
5             select '011' from dual union all
6             select '1' from dual union all
7             select '10' from dual union all
8             select '11' from dual)
9 -- end of test data
10 SELECT     x
11 FROM       t, (select '&required' as req from dual) req
12 WHERE x != req.req
13 START WITH x = req.req
14* CONNECT BY PRIOR x LIKE x || '_'
SQL> /
Enter value for required: 011
old 11: FROM   t, (select '&required' as req from dual) req
new 11: FROM   t, (select '011' as req from dual) req
X
01
0
SQL> /
Enter value for required: 11
old 11: FROM   t, (select '&required' as req from dual) req
new 11: FROM   t, (select '11' as req from dual) req
X
1
SQL>

No data for Parent-child hierarchy column in Pivot table view

Hi all,
I used OBIEE 11.1.1.6.2 Version.
I drag one Parent-child hierarchy column and one measure and show result with a pivot table view.
But when I click "+" icon to show detail level data,
It messaged that: "*the layout of this view combined with the data,selections,drills,or prompt values chosen resulted in no data*."
But it can show every-level data when I used table view.
It was so strange..
Did anybody meet this before?
Thanks in advance.
regards,
Anne

Hi,
Yes, I have the same problem with pivot table for hierarchy dimension.
If you use a normal table (not pivot) it seem to work. Unfortunatley with restrictions as normal table view have.
Same problem still exist in 11.1.1.6.5
I have logged a SR to Oracle about this.

Parent Child Hierarchy Issue in OBIEE 11g

Hi All,
I am in OBIEE 11G v6. I have a sales fact table where the grain is one sale. So I have one row for every sale done.
Now I have a ragged employee hierarchy like this with David at the root node.
David >>Richard>>Sean
David >>James
Also, I have a role dimension which gives me what role each employee has performed on a sale. Only one employee can be associated with one sale. This is the way Roles have been asssigned
David = Manager
Richard = Off1
Sean = Off2
James = Off2
Both Sean and James can have same Roles. Now I have created a parent child hierarchy for my employee dimension and the closure table. Defined the member key, ancestor key relationship in the parent child setting etc.
Now in the report when I pull the parent child hierarchy and the sales_amount in the report, it comes out perfect with all the ragged hierarchy resolved. But the issue comes when I try to limit the report on Role = Off2. It gives me an error saying " The layout of this view combined with the data, selection , drills resulted in no data. Undo drill and view prompt values". Basically what i want is to be able to select any role type and then my hierarchy should be adjusted to show me that data. Like when I select Off2, I want to see David at the Top level and Sean and James under him because they are both Off 2 and David is their manager.
Is that possbile? Also, am I getting this error because when I select Off2 though it gets Sean and James but since David is not Off2, I don't get the data?
I hope I was able to explain the issue, any help on this would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks
Ronny

So basically this means that if I build a parent child hierarchy on table A having the stucture like
--David (Manager)
-----James (Off1)
--------Bill (Off2)
and in my sales fact table for let's say today, I have only rows for Bill (Off2) because he is the only officer who did the sales today. Now when I will join my fact table to parent child hierarchy table A I will NOT get any data ? because there is no James who is the parent of Bill. So obiee need to have parent pulled off in the data (ANCESTOR) to be able to roll up the child.(IS_LEAF = 1)
I testes this and if my data only contains only rows for Bill (or I limit on ROLE = Off2) then it won't show the hierarchy. The query which OBIEE fires is to look for either ANCESTOR_KEY = NULL OR (DISTANCE = 1 AND ANCESTOR KEY IN (Bill). Therefore it doesn't I am wondering then what is the use of builiding the parent child hierarchy when we need to pull in all the ancestors (like in this case James for bill and David for james) because in real scenarios there can be cases wherein we would want to filter the data based on other dimensions to which the parent child hierarchy joins ?

OBIEE 11g - Navigation in Parent Child Hiearchy not working

Hi All,
I have a employee parent child hierarchy and I want to show revenue for each employee in the report. I have modeled my revenue as a measure like case 4 shown in the following link
http://www.rittmanmead.com/2010/11/oracle-bi-ee-11g-parent-child-hierarchies-multiple-modeling-methods/
So for example this is my report ,
--David (30)
---Sandra (15)
-----Joe (10)
Joe'e revenue is 10, Sandra's is 5 (showing her 5 Joe's revenue) and David's is 5 (showing his 5 Sandra's revenue)
Issue :
Now what I want is to provide action link on the revenue column so that when user would click on revenue for any employee it would direct them to a detail report showing the bifurcation.
For ex, I want that when user click on 15 which is Sandra's revenue, he would be redirected to a detailed report for Sandra and similary for Joe and David
MY ISSUE IS that the navigation is NOT working for sandra and Joe. It is only working for David (who is the ancestor of sandra and Joe). When I click on 15 to see sandra's detail report, it doesn't do anything and in the bottom left corner of the browser status bar below I see an ERROR saying
(same for Joe but David work's fine)
Message: 'getLevelInfo(...)' is null or not an object
Line: 1
Char: 11142
Code: 0
URI: http://localhost:7001/analytics/res/b_mozilla/answers/selectionsmodel.js
Why is that happening? Is that because I have modeled the revenue as an measure and not attribute. Is navigation not possible in this case?
Anybody has any solution or workaround for this, it will be highly appreciated.
Thanks,
Ronny

Ok, so let me explain this in detail and give the structure of my tables and the data,
There are three tables.
1.Parent Child relationship table - pctable
2.Closure table which OBIEE creates through a script - reltable
3.Fact table which contains the revenue - facttable
This is the data
pctable
personid | managerid
David | NULL
Sandra| David
Joe|Sandra
reltable
memberkey | ancestorkey |distance |is_leaf
David|NULL|NULL|0
David|David|0|0
Sandra|Sandra|0|0
Joe|Joe|0|0
Sandra|David|1|0
Joe|Sandra|1|1
Joe|David|2|1
facttable
personid|revenue
David|5
Sandra|5
Joe|10
and my joins conditions are, I join pctable to reltable and then reltable is joined to facttable like this.
pctable.personid = reltable.ancestorkey
reltable.memberkey = facttable.personid
and then in the report, when I pull up the pchierarchy build from pctable and revenue , I get as below and like I said, when I click on Sandra to see the revenue she contributes, I am not able to navigate. Can you let me know what modifications needs to be done?
---David(20)
----Sandra(15)
------Joe(10)

Parent & Child Numbering

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for