Parsing Problem in different platform

Hi~ Can anyone help me?? I have problem parsing a html page to xml using tagsoup. The parsed xml file look file in Windows XP Professional environment (i.e. only one <head> and <body> tags). But when I execute the code in Windows Server 2003 Enterprise x64 Edition, the parsed xml file will contain multiples <head> and <body> tags. Anyone know what's went wrong?

First, let me say that you might get more direct answers by posting into the Camera Raw forum:
http://forums.adobe.com/community/cameraraw
They may ask you for a file with which to reproduce the problem.
Out of curiosity, did you open these JPEG files at some point in the past using an older version of Camera Raw? Assuming you did, keep in mind that Camera Raw writes metadata back into JPEG files when you open them, even if you never direct the software to save back to the original JPEG file. Put simply, an "original" JPEG file is no longer original after Camera Raw has been used on it. Yes, it's hard to believe.
If I'm on the right track here, it sounds as though not only did it write data back into the file, but now perhaps the new version can't quite make sense of what the older version wrote.
I have an open thread in the Camera Raw forum in which I am requesting that this behavior (writing data back to the input file) be made optional. Please feel free to add to it if that's what's happened to you.
http://forums.adobe.com/thread/848551?tstart=0
-Noel

Similar Messages

Building and Deploying Java applications in different platform (OS)

Hi all,
We currently have a J2EE based web services application that is built (compiled) and deployed on Windows 2000 Advanced server. But in future, we will be using WIndows 2000 server for development only and HP-UX for production.
So, we are planning on executing the build (compilation) of our application on Windows 2000 server and deploy the same binaries (WAR) on HP-UX also. So, I wanted to know anyone has faced issues in the past by deploying an application on a different platform than the one on which it was compiled. Is it recommended by SUN to compile and build Java applications on the same platform on which the application is deployed.
Note that in my case, the JVM versions between Windows server and HP-UX would be the same. But the JVM for Windows server has been provided by Sun and the JVM for HP-UX has been provided by HP-UX.
Your inputs are greatly appreciated.

Well, it's all Java, right? So what's the problem? Since the JVM for HP-UX isn't made by Sun, so there could be compatibility problems, but I would expect that would be minimal if a problem at all. But you can't know unless you run it.
I don't know about building on the different systems. Java's supposed to be write once, run anywhere.... The byte code should be compatible no matter what. I've never heard of Sun saying "compile it on each platform". If the HP JVM isn't going to like bytecode compiled on Windows or another OS, then something isn't kosher with someone's JVM or compiler.

Database Client - Server Interoperability betwen different platforms

Hi everyone,
we run a 11.1.0.7 on HP-UX Itanium servers. We use COBOL, and connecting to database is via Database Client libraries (COBOL precompiler, client libraries linked to application). Application, Client and Server are on the same server.
Now we are planning to move database to different server and even to different platform. So finally we would have a HP-UX server with a Database Client software (the same version as database server) with a COBOL procompilers libraries and the database server on different server on IBM AIX server.
Do you thing this is a problem? As I expect there wouldn't be a problem because client and database comunnicates on platform-free (endian-free) protocol OCI or whichever protocol it is.
Thanks for any reactions,
Michal

Hi;
please see Master Note For Oracle Database Client Installation [ID 1157463.1] note which is cover Database Client - Server Interoperability betwen different platforms concept
Regard
Helios

Read/Write in Different Platforms

Is it possible to read/write in different platforms?
I put some items into Berkeley DB with C in Linux environment (64 bit) and read these items with C# in windows environment (32 bit). Writing part was successfully done. However, reading was failed. Berkeley DB version is 4.6 in Linux and 4.8 in Windows. I used network drive to read Berkeley DB which was produced in Linux. Types of key and data are strings (char array). Do you have any idea?
Edited by: user4821123 on Jan 11, 2010 1:12 PM

Without having looked up anything to verify specifics, I am fairly sure that database file format has changed between 4.6 and 4.8. Assuming that is the case (I am fairly sure it is, but again I haven't verified this) then you'll need to upgrade the 4.6 installation to 4.8. In that case, I believe that you should not have a problem between environments. 32 vs. 64 bit should be irrelevant assuming you aren't storing information that is architecture-dependent. The only problem I believe you are likely to run into is endian difference - you can deal with that via settings, but it sounds like it's not relevant for your situation anyway.
Asher

WIJ 20002 xml Parser Problem - Rich Client

Hi,
I have a problem with the rich client on a new installation:
Business Objects Enterprise XI 3.1 SP3 on Windows 2008 Standard.
If I connect with the rich client "import document"is disabled.
if I try to create a new document from the rich client it returns the error below (I used the rich client on two workstations):
WIJ 20002
Version: null
Analisi dello stack:
java.lang.RuntimeException: java.lang.RuntimeException: XML parser problem:
XMLJaxpParser.parse(): Element type "ABOUT_Patentnumbers" must be followed by either attribute specification, ">" or "/>".
at com.businessobjects.wp.xml.jaxp.XMLJaxpParser.parse (Unknown Source)
at.com.businessobjects.webi.richclient.XMLviaOccaRC.getServerConfiguration (Unknown Source)
Have you any solution?

The fixpack 3.5 client resolves the problem.

Report query parsing problem

I didn't find any report of this problem...
Using APEX 3.0.1.00.07, I have a report of type "SQL Query (PL/SQL function body returning SQL query)" with the "Use Generic Column Names (parse query at runtime only)" radio button selected.
When the region source contains the string "ORDER BY" in any form that I've tried (even in a comment), attempting to save the region fails with "Your query can't include an "ORDER BY" clause when having column heading sorting enabled."
I do indeed have column sorting enabled on certain columns, but I don't see how that is relevant under these circumstances since the query produced at runtime does not have an ORDER BY clause.
Am I overlooking something or is this a parsing problem?
Rodney

Rodney,
It's just checking for order by being included in your query, and if so and you have column heading sorting enabled, it's raising this error because you can't have both (even if it's commented out).
Regards,
Marc

Urgent! Application tier and Data tier on different platforms

Hello!
I would be very grateful if someone confirms that the deployment of the Beehive, where Application tier and Data tier are placed on different platforms, is supported.
For example, Oracle Database (Data tier) on Linux, and Oracle Application Server (Application tier) on Windows.
Thanks in advance.
Dima.

Hi Dima,
Yes, this will work.

SAX parser problem in JDK1.5

I have parse the xml file using SAX in jdk1.5 environment. During the parsing, it missed the some text content.
for example
<employeeid>
<empid>1001</empid>
<empid>1002</empid>
</employeeid>
If i have parse the above xml file using SAX in jdk1.5 environment. The output is
1001
100
during the parsing , SAX parser misses digit of 2.
if i have parse the above xml file using SAX in jdk1.4 environment , it is working fine.
what is the problem in jdk1.5
please help
bala

What I expect the problem to be was discussed recently in a topic titled "SAX Parser Problems" that was started on March 14 at 6:59 AM by JackoBS.
Read that and see if it fixes your problem. If so, it is not a JDK1.5 problem, but a user error.
Dave Patterson

Adobe Pro on 2 different platforms?

Why is it not possible to install Adobe Pro on 2 different platforms? It allows me to install on 2 computers but not 2 platforms? I'm having issues understanding why I'm not allowed to install on 2 computers regardless of the platform.

It's an issue because they chose to do it that way, and sell serial numbers which work on Windows, or Mac. They make the rules. You won't find Adobe here defending or commenting on their policies.
Allowing two computers is more generous than some companies.
I've heard it said that, if you subscribe instead, because you don't get a serial number, you can have one Windows and one Mac.

How to apply metrics for different platform

Hi,
If a metric has different code for different platform, or the metric only runs on some specific type of system, how can we apply it to a group of hosts?
For example, I have a metric that checks only Sun T3 types of systems. I can create a group of hosts that are T3 type system, but how do I apply the metric to this group?
The other example is the way to collect data is different for Soaris and Linux platform, can I have 2 metrics, one apply to the group of Solaris machines, and the other apply to the group of Linux machines?
Thanks.

Hi,
You can use EM groups and monitoring templates to accomplish what you want to do. For example, create a group for Solaris hosts and a template to push out appropriate metric settings for the group.
Documentation links:
- EM groups:
http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E24628_01/doc.121/e24473/group_management.htm#DAFHBFCB
- Monitoring templates:
http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E24628_01/doc.121/e24473/monitor_overview.htm#sthref38
Regards,
- Loc

LabVIEW Embedded - Performance Testing - Different Platforms

Hi all,
I've done some performance testing of LabVIEW on various microcontroller development boards (LabVIEW Embedded for ARM) as well as on a cRIO 9122 Real-time Controller (LabVIEW Real-time) and a Dell Optiplex 790 (LabVIEW desktop). You may find the results interesting. The full report is attached and the final page of the report is reproduced below.
Test Summary
µC MIPS
Single Loop
Effective MIPS
Single Loop
Efficiency
Dual Loop
Effective MIPS
Dual Loop
Efficiency
MCB2300
65
    31.8
49%
      4.1
6%
LM3S8962
60
    50.0
83%
      9.5
16%
LPC1788
120
    80.9
56%
    12.0
8%
cRIO 9122
760
152.4
20%
223.0
29%
Optiplex 790
6114
5533.7
91%
5655.0
92%
Analysis
For microcontrollers, single loop programming can retain almost 100% of the processing power. Such programming would require that all I/O is non-blocking as well as use of interrupts. Multiple loop programming is not recommended, except for simple applications running at loop rates less than 200 Hz, since the vast majority of the processing power is taken by LabVIEW/OS overhead.
For cRIO, there is much more processing power available, however approximately 70 to 80% of it is lost to LabVIEW/OS overhead. The end result is that what can be achieved is limiting.
For the Desktop, we get the best of both worlds; extraordinary processing power and high efficiency.
Speculation on why LabVIEW Embedded for ARM and LabVIEW Real-time performance is so poor puts the blame on excessive context switch. Each context switch typically takes 150 to 200 machine cycles and these appear to be inserted for each loop iteration. This means that tight loops (fast with not much computation) consume enormous amounts of processing power. If this is the case, an option to force a context switch every Nth loop iteration would be useful.
Conclusion
LabVIEW Embedded
for ARM
LabVIEW Real-time for cRIO/sbRIO
LabVIEW Desktop for Windows
Development Environment Cost
High
Reasonable
Reasonable
Execution Platform Cost
Very low
Very High / High
Low
Processing Power
Low (current Tier 1)
Medium
Enormous
LabVIEW/OS efficiency
Low
Low
High
OEM friendly
Yes+
No
Yes
LabVIEW Desktop has many attractive features. This explain why LabVIEW Desktop is so successful and is the vast majority of National Instruments’ software sales (and consequently results in the vast majority of hardware sales). It is National Instruments’ flagship product and is the precursor to the other LabVIEW offerings. The execution platform is powerful, available in various form factors from various sources and is competitively priced.
LabVIEW Real-time on a cRIO/sb-RIO is a lot less attractive. To make this platform attractive the execution platform cost needs to be vastly decreased while increasing the raw processing power. It would also be beneficial to examine why the LabVIEW/OS overhead is so high. A single plug-in board no larger than 75 x 50 mm (3” x 2”) with a single unit price under $180 would certainly make the sb-RIO a viable execution platform. The peripheral connectors would not be part of the board and would be accessible via a connector. A developer mother board could house the various connectors, but these are not needed when incorporated into the final product. The recently released Xilinx Zynq would be a great chip to use ($15 in volume, 2 x ARM Cortex A9 at 800 MHz (4,000 MIPS), FPGA fabric and lots more).
LabVIEW Embedded for ARM is very OEM friendly with development boards that are open source with circuit diagrams available. To make this platform attractive, new more capable Tier 1 boards will need to be introduced, mainly to counter the large LabVIEW/OS overhead. As before, these target boards would come from microcontroller manufacturers, thereby making them inexpensive and open source. It would also be beneficial to examine why the LabVIEW/OS overhead is so high. What is required now is another Tier 1 boards (eg. DK-LM3S9D96 (ARM Cortex M3 80 MHz/96 MIPS)). Further Tier 1 boards should be targeted every two years (eg. BeagleBoard-xM (ARM Cortex A8 1000 MHz/2000 MIPS board)) to keep LabVIEW Embedded for ARM relevant.
Attachments:
LabVIEW Embedded - Performance Testing - Different Platforms.pdf ‏307 KB

I've got to say though, it would really be good if NI could further develop the ARM embedded toolkit.
In the industry I'm in, and probably many others, control algorithm development and testing oocurs in labview. If you have a good LV developer or team, you'll end up with fairly solid, stable and tested code. But what happens now, once the concept is validated, is that all this is thrown away and the C programmers create the embedded code that will go into the real product.
The development cycle starts from scratch.
It would be amazing if you could strip down that code and deploy it onto ARM and expect it to not be too inefficient. Development costs and time to market go way down.. BUT, but especially in the industry I presently work in, the final product's COST is extremely important. (These being consumer products, chaper micro cheaper product) .
These concerns weight HEAVILY. I didn't get a warm fuzzy about the ARM toolkit for my application. I'm sure it's got its niches, but just imagine what could happen if some more work went into it to make it truly appealing to wider market...

Output from same script on two different platforms produce different outputs.

I'm running a command prompt script on two different platforms (Windows 7 desktop and a Microsoft Server 2008 R2 Enterprise platform) and the output the script produces is different on each platform.
Specifically; the script is
For /f "tokens=2-4 delims=/ " %%a in ('date /t') do (set mydate=%%c-%%a-%%b)
For /f "tokens=1-2 delims=/:" %%a in ('time /t') do (set mytime=%%a%%b)
echo %mydate%>> log.txt
echo %mytime%>> log.txt
and the output from the Windows 7 desktop is:
2014-07-31
0249 PM
While the output from the 2008 server is:
ECHO is on.
0249 PM

Hi Dave,
There's some very good learning resources here:
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/scriptcenter/dd793612.aspx
Also, there's a script repository full of examples you can learn from and tweak to meet your needs here:
http://gallery.technet.microsoft.com/scriptcenter
As an additional suggestion, I'd highly recommend upgrading PowerShell on Win7 and WS2008R2 to v4. v2 was okay, but v4 makes life much easier (make sure you read the system requirements first though, there's still a few incompatibilities):
http://www.microsoft.com/en-us/download/details.aspx?id=40855
Don't retire TechNet! -
(Don't give up yet - 12,950+ strong and growing)

Basic Question about Different Platforms & their Versions

Hi Experts!!
Can any one help me to understand.
Q 1 : What all are the Different Platforms to design apps for SAP?
Q 2 : What make them different with each other?
Q 3 : What are the Different version available in market?
Q 4 : What is the best among all to start with for a New Learner?
Regards
Devraj

I am assuming you are talking about MOBILITY platform? right ?
You must check this discussion Where to start for Developing Mobile Apps

Parsing Problems? ImageIcon and BufferedImage

Hi to everyone
Could I ask if I will to send ImageIcon with BufferedImage as its arguement. Then what should I receieve from the server? ImageIcon only or ImageIcon with BufferedImage as its arugement?
Any help will be appreciated. Thank You.

I am sending ImageIcon over to the server, hence the server will receive as ImageIcon.
However, when I want to pass the ImageIcon which being parse to Image, this step is ok. Lastly when I want to parse the Image to BufferedImage image, I am encountering parsing problems, hence could u advise me further.
The error message "Receiving failed: java.lang.ClassCastException"
Any help will be appreciated. Thank You.
     public void getImage()
          //Object input = null;
        Image images = null;
          try{
               imgIcon = (ImageIcon)oin.readObject();
               System.out.println("Icon Width: "+imgIcon.getIconWidth());
               while((images = imgIcon.getImage()) != null)
                    System.out.println("Images Width: "+Image.getWidth(images));
                    BufferedImage bimage = (BufferedImage)images; // PROBLEM LIES HERE
                    System.out.println("Bimage Width: "+bimage.getWidth());
                    ImageServerConnection.writeImage(bimage, "happy.jpg");
                    //String fname = "joalicia";
                    //create an new folder to store those sent images.
                    //File f = new File ("c:\\Sweet", fname);
                    //create(f);
          }catch(Exception e){
               System.err.println("Receiving failed: "+ e);
     }

Data guard between different platforms?

I'm pretty sure the answer is no but just want to be sure, so my question is...Can you have a data guard physical standby server that is running on a different platform than the primary?
For instance, We have just been informed by our sakes rep that Oracle is dropping the Itanium platform because future releases of red hat will no longer be supporting the Itanium platform and that Oracle is following the red hat model...
Can we setup dataguard to migrate off of current hardware platform to a new X86_64 platform?
Thanks.

user520056 wrote:
I'm pretty sure the answer is no but just want to be sure, so my question is...Can you have a data guard physical standby server that is running on a different platform than the primary?No, this is not possible.
For instance, We have just been informed by our sakes rep that Oracle is dropping the Itanium platform because future releases of red hat will no longer be supporting the Itanium platform and that Oracle is following the red hat model...
Can we setup dataguard to migrate off of current hardware platform to a new X86_64 platform?
Thanks.This would follow the same rule that both, primary and standby must run on the same platform and o/s. So I guess, the answer would be that you would need to move both of your servers. But, just to be assure, you should raise the same question on the dedicated forum of dataguard where product manager of DG , Larry Carpenter hangs around as well. That would be the place where I would ask my data guard doubts.
Data Guard
HTH
Aman....

Parsing Problem in different platform

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for