Partial Asset data transfer at company code level

Hi all,
We are planning to go live on december 1st, 2007. My client wants to hold a portion of fixed assets relating on one company code and want to convert them after couple of months.
I think I will go with the current conversions and leave the division for which they want to hold, and to keep the company code in test mode. Planning to use the same conversion program designed for that particular division after go-live.
And the GL balances for that particular division will be in non-recon account to ensure that there will not be any inconsistency between GL-FI
Before second load after making correct entries, to convert the non recon account to recon and
Please advice me, about this situation any impacts.
Thanks
Krishna

Never mind. We managed somehow to figure it out ourselves.

Similar Messages

Backup data in Company code level

Hello,
Does anyone know any SAP tools which can backup Company code level data. Eg FI Doc, Customer Master, Vendor Master..
Cheers,
Benny

Hi Anil,
Thanks for reading my message.
Our SAP server is 4.7, which has ~500 company codes. Currently we would like to extract 2 company codes data and restore in another ECC 6.0 server. Assume both servers have the identical configurations. From our understanding, backup and restore would be one of the approaches to achieve that.
Is there any SAP tools that allow us migrate all company code level data to the ECC 6.0 server? Eg FI Doc, Customer Master, Vendor Master, PO, SO, Asset accounting datau2026.
Cheers,
Benny

Customer-based BP role, Company Code level data

System ECC 5.0.
May be somebody can help me in a problem with Company code level data for BP.
I'm trying to create new BP in custom Z role (created by me), on company code data screen I cannot set "Company Code Is Valid for Customer" indicator on company code selection dialog box.
I use custom Z role with assigned custom Z rolecategory (with active BP-customer syncronizaton), It seems that there is a missing setting in SPRO for rolecategory that activate possibility to enter company code data.....

After some investigation.... the problem was not in customising, but in some requirements from code: BP role should have the same name as s BP rolecategory. After renaming it goes.

Vluation at company code level and transfer prices in EC-PCA

Hi,
We have the following configuration:
1. Valuation of stock at Company Code level.
2. Transfer pricing between Profit Center (i.e. Material Ledger is active).
we experience some technical issues (e.g. we get error message when entering MM03 accounting view). Our Plants and Company Codes were created using copying standard SAP delivered Org. units.
Did any of you implement such a configuration? Do you have knowledge of limitations and problems that might result?
TIA for you help,
Avihay

Never mind. We managed somehow to figure it out ourselves.

Asset transfer from company code to company code

Hi ,
I want to transfer assets from one company code located in India to another company code located in the US. The existing configuration is as under.
Both the the company codes share the same "chart of accoutns" but the "chart of depreicaiton" and the "controlling areas" of the above two company codes are different.
The client wants to transfer the assets at net book value.
In the above scenario (1) is it possible to transfer the assets.
(2) shall we have identical depreciation areas in both COD's
(3) what would be transaction variant should we use? and the its mapping the transaction types in "Define Transfer Variants" node?
Moderator: Please, avoid asking basic questions

Dear,
Please check: Re: asset transfer within company code from one plant to another using STO
Re: how to transfer an asset from one plant to another plant within comp code
http://sap.ittoolbox.com/groups/technical-functional/sap-acct/asset-transfer-237416
Regards,
Syed Hussain.

How identify the data is client level,plant level or company code level

Dear sirs,
GM
How identify the data is client level,plant level or company code level?
If there is any T.code for same in SAP plz send me otherwise any procedure?
Hopeeeeeeeeee....

Hi,
Once you gain experience, you will not look at any table any field or any view...You will do it just like how you use keyboard once you pass type writing....
That is why every area of work, including master data is handed over to specialized teams...that will be their work day in and out....for some one newly entering, it will be little bit tough...once you practice, you will not be worried any more. Of course, basic data at client level, purchasing data plant level etc...some thumb rules are there...still, you will take big blow by following such thumb rules because if you verify storage condition assigned in the storage location is not storage location level!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
that is experience!! In this forum, it is good to practice rewarding...else, there may not be any more replies
Good Luck
Message was edited by:
Gopala Turaga

Classic profit centers reporting full b/s below company code level

Dear Experts,
we are using classic profit center. How to get Profit center wise balance sheet below company code level.
Facing issues for balance sheet GL accounts as at 3KEH one profit center i can choose...my requirement is to get 2 balance sheets for two profit centers.
any suggestions ?
Regards,
Sekhar

Hello Sekhar,
With Classic profit center accounting correct balance sheet cannot be ensured at Profit center level.
This is due to following reasons
1. Vendor/ Customer line items -
No assignment of Vendor/Customer recon accounts to Profit center in 3KEH.
But in period end you have to execute F.5D and 1KEK to transfer this values to Profit center accounting based on the offsetting line items.
This also might create problems if you don't clear the open items on period end as your Sales/Purchase will go to one Profit center and Payment will go to other (defaulted for Bank/Cash). Cleared items are not transferred
Also, Transaction between Vendor and Customer will lead to some values posting in Dummy profit center.
2. Asset line items
Profit center will be determined by Asset master
3. Tax accounts
Mostly it has to go with Default Profit center. SAP has given option for re-determination of Tax line items profit center based on off-setting line items during period end (Tax account should be assigned to Dummy profit center in 3KEH). But this will work only for Sales/Purchase transaction, as payment will go to default profit center used for Cash/Bank. Again it might lead to confusion.
4. Material accounts
Profit center assigned in Material master is used.
5. Other Balance sheet accounts
These accounts like Bank, Cash, loan etc has to be assigned to default Profit centers using 3KEH. Else, user has to enter the correct Profit center during entry. If missed out, it will go to default profit center. Remember, balance sheet accounts not included in 3KEH (except for Vendor/Customer) will not be transferred to Profit center accounting itself.
Hope it helps..
Thanks & Regards,
Muneer Ahamed N

Client level, chart of accounts level, company code level

Generally what are the areas under client level, chart of accounts level, company code level.
For Ex. document types are client level, number range company code level
like the above does we have any list which is falling in the above levels.

1. Generally during customising when co code data is not asked , then settings are client level.
Country, Currency, Document types, all variants of diff types, chart of accounts, etc
2. Every master is having data - General data level (client level) for use by all co codes, Co code data level(basically for accounting purposes) and so on.
These are applicable to GL, Vendor, Customer, Asset, Matlerials, etc
For particular application we have more information at another object level also- Vendor- Purchasing, Customer-Sales, materials-Plant- controlling, etc
3. Chart of accounts level assignments are done for all automatic posting definitions-which is applicable to all company codes which are using same chart of accounts.
4. In material setting- valuation can be grouping level, co code level or plant level as these are related to costing and product costing.
Hope the above will give some idea.
In the above nothing is written about CO as you have not asked-

Manage vendor bank account in company code level - Best practice

hi,
we have on our client several company codes, and we are thinking how to manage the vendor bank accounts in company codes level or in centeral level.
our problem with company codes level is that the vendor bank accounts define in a centeral level so technically with sap standard it is not possible. if anyone can tell me that this is possible i will be very happy to know.
in centeral level our problem is with the business process because of we do not have a person (functionalism ) that can be responsible for all the company codes, basically every company shoule be responsible for her vendors
please advice what is the best practice to manage vendor bank accounts in enviroment of several company code
regards,
meir

hi Raghu,
i know that but this is not my qusition.
which company code will be responsible to enter the bank account in the vendor master data? as i say the vendor bank accounts manage in centeral level and not in company code level and this is our problem and i like to know how other companies with the same situation handle with this issue
and also after we have the bank accounts in the vendor master data what happend if for one vendor has several bank accounts one for every company code? how the payment program F110 could know automaticaly which bank account to take (i know that there is an optoin to use Partner bank type in the vendor master data, and enter this PBT when posting the invoice of the vednor, but this is not good because of we do not want the the accountant will be responsible from which bank the vendor get his money).
regards,
meir

Material valuation at company code level

Hi,
We have the valuation at company code level and when we transfer material from one plant to another (Two step stock transfer) the system dont post fi document. When the profit center of the material is assign an fi document is posted. Somebody knows why?
Thanks
Edited by: Elisabete Cuellar on Jul 27, 2010 11:56 AM

you have valuation at company code level.
both plants are in same company code, so same valuation level, so no FI document created , the FI docuement not required here
For profit center, FI document will be ceated for that profit center.
This is standard process only

SAP ISU- Can you help on Invoice Rounding steps at company code level,

Dear Friends,
Can you help on SAP ISU Invoice Rounding steps at company code level,
Client requirement is: - for one company code they need round the Invoice and other company codes they does not required the round option.
We have configured some steps, which are given below,
Contract Accounts Receivable and Payable - Basic Functions - Postings and Documents
1.     Define Rounding Rules for Currencies
2.     Define Accounts for Rounding Differences
3.     Accounts for Rounding Gross Amounts (IS-U)
4.     IS-U: Define Acct Assignment Data Relevant to Transactions
a.     (Main Transaction 0010 and Sub Transaction 0040)
SAP Utilities u2013 Invoicing
1.     Define Basic Settings for Invoicing
2.     Define Invoice Rounding Rules
Please provide the solution; I will be appreciating for earliest answer...
Thanks and Regards,
Prudhvi

Hello Christiane,
Thanks for your quick reply, and valuable information,
But we have u201CNo roundingu201D option available at client level, path has given below,
SPRO u2013 SAP Utilities Invoicing u2013 Basic setting u2013 Define Basic setting for invoicing
We are not authorized to change any configuration at client level,
If you can able to guide me at company code level that could be great,
Thanks for the support
Thanks and Regards,
Prudhvi

Blocking Vendors on Company Code level

Hi,
Our Purchasing Organization has multiple Company Codes. Is it possible to block certain vendors for a Particular company code without affecting the other company codes which might be using that vendor??
What exactly we are trying to do is block all future Purchase orders & Requisitions from being created for a list of Vendors for one company code. We do not want it to affect other Company codes within the same Purchasing Org which might be using the same suppliers.
I know about XK05 but I think it puts a "Purchasing block" at the Purchasing Org level only and not on the Company code level. Is there any way to achieve this??
Your inputs are really appreciated.

Hi Martin,
If you want to Block the Vendor for a Particular Purchase Organization and Company code then Go to XK05 and Select Vendor Pur Org and Comp Code and in Posting Block tab Activate for Selected Company code and in Purchasing Block tab Activate for Selected Purchase Organization and Save.
Before this you need to set the following to Error.
SPRO-MM-Purchasing-Environment data-Define attributes for System messages
ME 023 Vendor & blocked for purchasing organization &
ME 024 Vendor & flagged for deletion
ME 025 Vendor & flagged for deletion for purchasing organization &
For XK05 Message ME 023 would work.
Regards,
Nani.

CO-period lock for planning on company code level

Hello,
I would like to ask you for assistence.
We would like to have the possiblity to lock the CO-periods on company code levels. For actual values, it is possible to arrange this within the validation. However, for plan values the validation is not active.
I have read about possibility to enhance an user exit for paritcular planning transactions (KP06, KP26 etc.), but I can't find it anymore.
Does anybody from you have experience with this, eventually is there another option?
Thanks in advance
Peter

I have had a similiar problem and contact to remote consulting from SAP. They offered a modification (10-15 days if I remember correctly) to make CO period lock company code depending.
If I remember correctly, his name was Valentin (in Germany).
However: if newGL is active with real-time integration and also plan transfer, I think it should be possible to lock in FI.
regards
Bjoern

F.01 & FBL3N amounts mismatched at Company Code Level

Hello Gurus,
At Client side, we are facing problem of mismatch in FBL3N & F.01 Report for some GL accounts and this is at Company Code level not Profit Center or Segment Level.
I have also verified the Master Data of GLs which are having problem but these accounts master data are same as that of GL accounts having tallied amount in both reports, I have already check on all the posts as this is frequently asked Question but all the replies for those are not given proper solutions.
Please suggest me for this Error.
Thanks & Regards,
Rajdeep.

Dear Randeep,
If you are on profit center accounting ECC 6.0. Then Fbl3n cannot be matched with F.01( which runs on profit enter level).
you need to match F.01 with FAGLL0(Zero)3. provide profit center in dynamic selection and give open item as on as per the period you have provided in F.01.
This will certainly match.
kindly provide points, This would solve your issue.
Ashok kumar

Communication method in Vendor master required at company code level

Standard Communication method field in Vendor master, which determines the method of communication with the business partner, is placed at General data level. Business uses same Vendor master across company codes / purchase organizations. The communication method for each of them can be different for the same Vendor record. This currently is a limitation in using MDM for Vendor data management. Is there a way to either move std communication method field to purchase org / company code level ? Is there any other possibility availble for meeting this business requirement ?

Hello,
The requirement is to have communication method by country (company code / purchase org). That will enable business to have different communication methods (print, fax, EDI etc) with corresponding Vendor business partners in respective country.
Thanks,
Tushar.

Partial Asset data transfer at company code level

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for