Past Due custom field/filter

Hi,
I'm trying to create a custom filter to see all tasks that's Finish date is past "Today" and % complete is less than 100. After some online searching I learned I would need to create a column first with a formula to check if a task's finish date
is less than Today's date and % Complete is less than 100. I came up with this formula:
IIf(([Finish]<Date()) And ([% Complete]<100),"Overdue","")
However, I don't think this is valid as the column only returned "No" as a value. Can you please correct my formula or inform me how to create a filter to check if the [FINISH] column is less than Today and [% COMPLETE] is less than 100?
Thanks

Hi Stepharr,
I see what you are trying to do, but it's already in Project for you. Insert the column STATUS and you will see these are autocalculated, based upon today's date (or the status date if it has been input).
If you are not using Project 2013, you may need to refresh the view to "recalc" the status after updating the %complete.
Ben Howard [MVP] | web |
blog | book

Similar Messages

SRM Portal - Search help for a custom field

Hi,
I have added a custom field to the SRM Portal (5.0) shopping cart, by adding the field to structures INCL_EEW_PD_ITEM_CSF INCL_EEW_PD_ITEM_CSF_SC.
However, I need to filter the search help for that custom field, based on values & relationships stored in a Z table.
Is this possible? How? Please help.
Thank You.

Currently, my idea would be to create a search help for the custom field & filter the values in a search help exit. However, would I be able to get other field values (standard) from SRM into my search help exit?

Filter Project Server custom field based on current user?

I've got a Project Server 2013 custom field, and I'd like to create a view that only shows me projects where the value in that custom field equals the current user. Simply put: I'm trying to find functionality similar to the [Me] filter in SharePoint.
Apparently, simply using [Me] doesn't work. How can I fix this?

I am trying to do something similar. were you able to find a solution to this? I am assuming no.
Parthiv Bhuta . Consultant

Bidder Not able to filter Bid Invitations with custom fields

Dear Community,
Need some ABAP help.
Know many experts are in our community.
We have added 3 custom fields to the Bid Invitation and Bid header
Coded Badi BBP_CUF_BADI_2 for them to appear in the Search criteria for Find Bid Invitation for both the logins(purchaser and bidder).
The custom fields now appear in the Extended search for both.
These custom fields extract values from custom tables.
But we found that the search criteria seems to be filtering Bid Invitations only in the Process Bid Invitation screen(Find Bid Invitation) of the purchaser login.
Template: bbp_bid_inv/99/saplbbp_bid_inv_1010.html
And NOT filtering Bid Invitations in the Process Bid screen(Find Bid Invitations and Auctions) of the Bidder login.
bbp_quot/99/saplbbp_quot_ui_its_1010.html
The ABAPer has already incuded the custom fields in structures INCL_EEW_PD_HEADER_CSF_BID and INCL_EEW_PD_HEADER_CSF_QUOT,
What is required in addition so that the search criteria will work in the Bidder login as well??
Thanks in Advance,
Dinesh
(Will appreciate with points)

Thanks, Disha.
We have alreday activated BBP_WF_LIST
and tried some code in method
BBP_WF_LIST_SOCO
but did not help us.
Can you suggest any specific code to try?
You are right for template modification for values of this custom fields.
If we do that Bidder CAN filter the BI correctly with these values of custom fields.
But customer does not want that way because in future the values would be changing.
and so it would be an additional task to correct templates.
Also they have to redo these changes with every upgrade.
So we are fetching the values from custom tables for these custom fields.
Would like to again draw the attention towards purchaser's search with these custom fields.
Why purchaser can search correctly with these custom fields fetching values from custom tables?
Can we debug or take any hint from there?
Any futher thoughts?
Landscape - SRM 5.0 SP11 CLASSIC
BR
Dinesh
Already raised an OSS for this issue.
Will keep updated about any responce.

How to filter Groupwise records using custom fields?

I am consuming the Groupwise web service and want to search
the appointments based on value provided for a custom field. All
the other searches (date, subject, message) are working fine. The
only thing that does not work is search on the custom field. If I
search on the Custom field the service returns all records.
Following is the excerpt of the code. CFGWID is the field
that is sent to groupwise with an application generated value. I am
able to query the field but cannot filter appointments using the
CFGWID field.
<filter>
<elements type="FilterGroup">
<element type="FilterEntry">
<op xsi:type="xsd:string">eq</op>
<custom xsi:type="xsd:custom">cfgwid</custom>
<value
xsi:type="xsd:string">#arguments.AppMsgID#</value>
</element>
</elements>
</filter>
At this time there is only one entry in this filter. Any
ideas?

PS0510 wrote:
> I am consuming the Groupwise web service
First of all, "Groupwise web service"!? Please tell me more
about this.
I use Groupwise here and this sounds like an interesting
feature!
> and want to search the appointments based on value
provided for a custom field.
How are you searching the custom field? Are you accounting
for the name
space xsi: and xsd: values? There is a bit of quirkiness with
CFML xml
functionality when working with name spaces. I've always been
able to
work out these issues with a bit of Google searching.

Account statements with 30 days past due items for customer

Hi Guys,
My client wants to generate the account statements or letters for customers whose open items are 30 days past due.I guess its related with dunning process not with generating regular statements using Tcode F.27. Could anyone please guide me what are the steps involved in achieving this scenario,and how system will capture the customer accounts outstanding with line items 30 days over due.I be grateful.Thanks
Iqtidar

In IMG -> Accounts Receivable ->Dunning->Basic Setting-> Define Dunning Area first and
Then define the dunning Procedure this where you will mention the due date after which you have to start the dunning procoss and the interval between 2 dunning level. Transaction code is FBMP
Attach the Dunning Procedure to the Customer Master ->Company Code Data -> Correspondence
Then run the Dunning Procedure in the Transaction Code : F150

Harassing Verizon customer service phone calls for past due under 30 days!!

Ok, this is ridiculous!! I switched from ATT 6 months ago, who has way better customer service by the way because I just couldn't get as good of cell service in my office building as Verizon so I had to switch!
I have never had so many calls over 3 - 5 times a day to have a partial past due balance that is still 10 days away from being 30 days late!
This is horrible on a customer service level and I want to complain that other companies are not this RUDE!! Sorry if you are broke trying to build too many cell towers and infrastructure and one time that you can't afford carrying people's past due balances for another few days but this will make me switch back to ATT.

Ok, this is ridiculous!! I switched from ATT 6 months ago, who has way better customer service by the way because I just couldn't get as good of cell service in my office building as Verizon so I had to switch!
I have never had so many calls over 3 - 5 times a day to have a partial past due balance that is still 10 days away from being 30 days late!
This is horrible on a customer service level and I want to complain that other companies are not this RUDE!! Sorry if you are broke trying to build too many cell towers and infrastructure and one time that you can't afford carrying people's past due balances for another few days but this will make me switch back to ATT.

Prevent marketing document entry if BP has past due invoices

Does anyone know a way to prevent users from entering a marketing document if the BP has past due invoices? Only solution I can come up with is to create code in the Transactions Notifications stored procedure. But is there a way to do this in B1?
Thanks

Hello Friend,
May be SP_Notification is the best option but think about your user will fill all the invoice data including with batch info and UDF info now he will goto add then SAP show error that Customer have open balance ,means users have spend about 5 min every day for invoice.
SAP has another option make FMS(Formatted search) and set in A/P invoice(CardName field or Name field) ,from where user will select customer list.FMS logic depend on party balace
And train user accordingly so now whenever user will select FMS option it will show only those customer who have no balance.
One more think some time our management say dispatch the materails i have discussed for balance then user select tab option in the same field.
Or if you are using SP then first you goto SQL then Alter the Procedure.
So I think FMS is the best option.
Thanks
Manvendra Singh Niranjan

Basic functions (high) in query formula for highest # of days past due

Hi All,
I hope you can help. I am trying to create a formula in a query for FIAR Line Item Cube (0fiar_c03). I would like to calculate the hightest number of days past due for open line items. There is an operator 'high' in basic functions within the query formula. Is it possible to use this?
Regards,
Cheryl Adamonis

There is a workaround usind conditions.That is you can try to filter the top 10 % or top 10 after calculating the no of days past.However this way you will not be displaying complete dataset

Search on the custom field in Product doesn't work

Hello everyone!
Lately I was configuring additional custom field for product header and succeed. Then I wanted to add this field as a search criteria for product search and I followed help on help.sap.com and note 1026956. Here are the steps I did:
1. I've extended structures CRMT_PRIL_QUERY_ADVSEARCH_PROD and CRMT_PRIL_QUERY_ADVSEARCH_IOBJ with my custom attribute.
2. I went to Master Data->Products-> Basic Settings ->Add Attributes to Search Structure and added my custom attribute there.
3. Then I found out that it's not enough and I should perform additional steps not included in note and help. I did these steps suggested by Shanthala Kudva in thread [Can't enable the extendable set type attributes in product search UI|Can't enable the extendable set type attributes in product search UI;.
After that I was able to configure UI and see the search criteria, but when I try to search using custom field I get error message: "Search criteria PRODUCT_ANKER.ZCAT_NUMBER in scenario CL_CRM_PRSEARCHSCENARIO_GETLST not included in tool/filter"
How to find out the reason of this behavior? Did I miss something in configuration?
P.S. Set type called ZPRODUCT, attribute ZCATNUMBER. In structures appended component called ZCAT_NUMBER with component type ZCATNUMBER. In table CRMC_PRSEA_ATTR the record has the attributename ZCAT_NUMBER, attribute_id ZCATNUMBER. Maybe I messed up with that?
Regards,
Alex.

Hi Alexander,
I know this is an old post, but currently i am facing the same issue of not being able to see my custom fields in the BSP Component Workbench.
I tried to follow all steps maintained in SAP Note # 10269656 & 1541480, but no luck.
Can you please tell me what do you mean by "Should not add the extended attributes directly to Search Structure, as SAP expects the attributes to be in APPEND structure"? Can you please let me know how the values are to be maintained in the Search structure table "CRMC_PRSEA_ATTR", which is also accessed using the IMG Meanu path "Master Data --> Products --> Basic Settings --> Add Attributes to Search Structure"
Appreciate your help.
Suresh Karri

Task custom field and formula custom field don't correspond Project Server 2013

Hi people, I have an interesting case in Project Server 2013 SP1 CU Apr:
I have a custom task number field called AM. This field get's filled by a PSI action with actual material costs from an external system.
I also have a custom task cost formula field that is called AM*. This field is a formula field that has the formula [AM]. And summary tasks use the formula field as well.
As soon as I create a project, assign costs in the external system and let PSI fill the values within AM I get correct values in AM. But nothing is calculated on AM*. If I edit the project in the browser and publish, check in and revisit the project
AM* still isn't filled.
If I open the project in MS Project Pro the calculation comes through nicely, however I do not want to use MS project Pro to see correct data in browser.
Some tests I have already done:
I have noticed that when I create a new calculated task field AM2*, this get's calculated correctly on the already existing task.
I have also noticed that opening the custom field in server settings and just saving the field creates correct values on AM*.
What is going on? I don't want to save the custom formula field every day... There are 11 custom formula fields in the environment at the moment.

Hi Gary,
Thank you for the quick response. Please note that the fieldnames are [AM] and [AM*]. There is a difference in field name due to the astrix. However I did think about the situation and changing one of the field names all together didn't do anything for the
situation at hand.
It looks like some kind of refresh thing, because without changing anything in the custom field just saving the field in server settings will turn op good values. However, values already turned up good in Project Professional 2013. And that suggest
that there is a calculation error on the PWA side wouldn't you say?
Anyway, thank you for taking time to look into this matter.
Erik

Enhancement-ABAP Code-Customized Field issue

Hi Experts,
Currently I am working on the BW3.5 version. We are using the standard SRM standard extractor 0BBP_TD_SC_1 and we enhance same extractor(populate the filed through CMOD - ABAP Code) with one customized field also. We are having issue on the customized field data which post from SRM system. I have verified the field value and value is fine in RSA3 in SRM source system. But while posting into the BW(PSA itself), its loading correct & wrong value. When i check the PSA for the particular load, It looks little strange. In the PSA, I can see correct value on my first record of the same SC and then next records has incorrect value of the same SC. Currently I am using the ODS as a data target. So finally i am getting the incorrect value on the customized field.
Ex Scenario:
Ex Customized Field: ZORGID
In SRM source system RSA3 Extractor Checker value:
Shopping Card No: 100
Customized Field: ZORGID=1
Shopping Card No: 200
Customized Field: ZORGID=2
In BW posting-PSA:
Shopping Card No: 100
Customized Field: ZORGID=2
Shopping Card No: 200
Customized Field: ZORGID=2
At the same time, if i do the selective deletion of the particular Shopping Card or group of SC in BW and do the full repair, then it gets a correct ZORGID=1 for the same Shopping Card.
I strongly believe, something wrong in the ABAP code. But when we tried to debug the customized filed value in RSA3. The value is fine. so we unable to trace out the issue. Please help me to fix the code. Thanks in advance.
CMOD ABAP Code:
*Populate approver ID even though it doesn't require approval this is required to make sure BW reports have restrict access to respective Org Unit approvals only
IF l_s_bbp_sc-approver_id IS INITIAL AND l_s_bbp_sc-itm_guid IS NOT INITIAL.
CALL FUNCTION 'Z_BBP_FIRST_APPROVALGET'
EXPORTING
iv_header_guid = l_s_bbp_sc-guid
iv_itm_guid = l_s_bbp_sc-itm_guid
IMPORTING
approver_no = l_s_bbp_sc-approver_id
EXCEPTIONS
no_data = 1
OTHERS = 2
IF sy-subrc 0.
ENDIF.
ENDIF.
To ensure that the Org Unit passed in into the field
l_s_bbp_sc-zzapprov_orgunit belongs to the Actual Level 1
Budget Owner and not any other manager such as Added Approver.
CLEAR : ls_ln_approvers, l_userid, lv_bpartner_guid.
DATA : lv_f_apprv_part TYPE BU_PARTNER.
READ TABLE lt_ln_approvers INTO ls_ln_approvers
WITH KEY INITIAL_INDEX = '0000000001'.
IF sy-subrc EQ 0.
MOVE ls_ln_approvers-approval_agent+2(12) TO l_userid.
CALL FUNCTION 'BP_CENTRALPERSON_GET'
EXPORTING
iv_username = l_userid
IMPORTING
ev_bu_partner_guid = lv_bpartner_guid
EXCEPTIONS
no_central_person = 1
no_business_partner = 2
no_id = 3
OTHERS = 4.
IF sy-subrc = 0.
CALL FUNCTION 'BUPA_NUMBERS_GET'
EXPORTING
iv_partner_guid = lv_bpartner_guid
IMPORTING
ev_partner = lv_f_apprv_part.
ENDIF.
ENDIF.
We get the BP number of the first Budget Owner 1
Here, we superseed the field l_s_bbp_sc-approver_id
whereby it may be wrong due to Added Approver.
IF l_s_bbp_sc-approver_id IS NOT INITIAL.
IF lv_f_apprv_part IS NOT INITIAL.
IF l_s_bbp_sc-itm_guid IS NOT INITIAL.
CALL FUNCTION 'RH_STRUC_GET'
EXPORTING
act_otype = 'BP'
act_objid = lv_f_apprv_part
act_wegid = 'EBP-UP'
act_begda = sy-datum
act_endda = sy-datum
act_tdepth = 4
TABLES
result_tab = lt_result_tab
EXCEPTIONS
no_plvar_found = 1
no_entry_found = 2
OTHERS = 3
IF sy-subrc = 0.
READ TABLE lt_result_tab INTO ls_result_tab WITH KEY
otype = 'O'.
IF sy-subrc EQ 0.
l_s_bbp_sc-zzapprov_orgunit = ls_result_tab-objid.
ELSE.
ENDIF.
ENDIF.
ENDIF.
Thanks,
RR

Hi Experts,
Any suggestions. Thanks.
Thanks,
RR

Custom field not getting populated in the "Show Results where" drop down

Hi all,
In appointment detail page by clicking on Add button on the user related information section , it takes us to a search layout showing the list of available users.
Here we have to filter the user's based on a custom field which has already been created in the user object. But I am not able to add the custom field in the "Show results where" drop down for which the search has to be done.
It is getting reflected in the normal search layouts.So Can any one tell me why the change is not getting reflected in the user related info search layout?

I tested your use case and you are correct. I would recommend that you submit a service request to CRM On Demand customer care in reference to this issue.

Importing into Address Book with Custom Fields from a Text File.

Hello
I'm a teacher and like to create contacts for my students. The information that I want in each contact besides their name, email address and phone number are their
student id's, semester enrolled, class number and class title. For these four fields I create a "Custom" field with the appropriate names: "ID", "Term", "Course" and "Class" respectively.
All this information I can download from the school's server in a CSV file.
To import the information into Address Book, I choose "File -> Import -> Text File" and then select the CSV file that I downloaded. The import utility opens up correctly showing all the fields I would like to import, however, many of the fields are marked as "Do not import." When I click on that term to select my Custom fields, they do not show up. Is this a bug or "feature" of the Address Book? It seems to me that if you are allowed to create useful custom fields, you should be able to import data into them as well.
If I'm just ignorant of how to do this, I would appreciate some help. If there is no way to currently do this efficiently, it would be nice to have this feature added to the Address book in the near future.
Thanks for your consideration,
Gary

Thanks for posting your question and the reply from rojok...
I'm a teacher as well - in Entourage I was able to just copy a column of email addresses (say from an Excel spreadsheet, downloaded from the school's server here at U MD) and then create a group and simply paste that list into the group. Address Book makes you do the extra step of importing all the addresses first. (Note: Your last imported list of contacts in this manner shows up as "Last Import" in the groups lists column to the left in Address Book - so to add contacts to a Group there, you select that Last Import group, click once in that list column one contact, say, then select all of the list - then Command + A, for select all - then drag them all to your group you've made - i.e. "MySpringClassList"). This is NOT very intuitive I might add and incredibly cumbersome of a process.
To get around the customizable info I needed to import... I just chose options that I don't regularly use for those things I needed to import - i.e. student I.D., these I placed under "ICQ Other" - that way they're imported at least.
Good luck,
Andrew

Address Book, importing text tab file, custom fields not there

Searched thru all past posts. Found some that are close but not what I am trying to do.
Open Address Book, go into Preferences, select Template and under the Names field (friend, assistant, father, etc) I add a custom field called "Keyword".
I also add two more custom fields in the Phone area called "Work 3" and "Work 4". There are other custom fields I need but I want to keep this short.
Quit Address Book then relaunch. Add a new contact and the new custom fields, Keyword, Work 3 and Work 4 are there. All good so far.
I have a Now Contact file with about 800 contacts in it. I export all fields as a Text file, Tab delimited. No problems there. With Address Book launched, select Import, pick the text file, leave Text Encoding on Automatic and click Open.
The window that shows the fields for Address Book and fields for the text file side by side opens. This is where you match up the correct fields for importing. If I go to one of the fields from the text file that I created a custom field for, click under the Address Book heading on the Do not import, scroll thru the Apple choices of fields, none of the custom fields show up. Only the original Apple ones are there. Why does Apple let you create them in the Template area but not have them available for importing?
That is my problem.
Adding new contacts as I get them, is fine. Importing 800 contacts with these custom fields is not possible.
I could map them to go to the Notes field along with actual notes but that is inelegant. The custom fields are there, why can't we use them to their full potential.
This appears to be a bug to me. Let me know what you think.

Hi Adam,
Thanks, but the problem is not importing to AddressBook, it is exporting. I did discover from another that I can export very easily to a Numbers spreedsheet. It is exceptionally simple. But it will not export custom fields. Someone said that is because of a vcard standard. My custom fields are just "name" fields that I have labeled differently. But Numbers does not support the name (it only takes the name of the card).
Christine

Past Due custom field/filter

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for