Pay to Function

Hi All,
I m Fresher In B1
I have Problem About Pay To Function. I Have Entered Pay To Address In Business master Data For Vendor, But it Is Not Displayed In A/P Invoice & Outgoing Payments Windows.
Pz. Give me answer .....................

Hello Manish,
In the BP Master Data, did you set the Pay To address as your default?
If there is no default Pay To address, then the A/P Invoice -> Logistics -> Pay To field will be blank. You can then select from the drop down lost to select the Pay To address.
Hope this helps.
Regards,
Lorna Real

Similar Messages

Oracle 11i Pay Upon Receipt functionality

Will Oracle 11i support the Pay Upon Functionality? The version we currently use does not apply credits or changes in the receiving amount when creating a voucher.

Hello ,
We are also struggling with the similar problem of reconciling the AR and i would seek your help here.
I believe you have figured out all the SQL queries used to get the AR recon done so i would request if you can share the SQL queries with me as it will help us to do our piece of activity in reconciling the AR.

I refuse to pay for an app to rename photos

I work professionally in film and video production and just bought a new 64GB iphone 5 for $399, hoping that it would speed up a lot of my workflow (quickly and easily manage media files and sharing, no annoying bugs and the other things we generally expect from Apple). After a couple days of using it I am totally let down, the main problem being how little control over your own file system you are given in the Apple framework. In my industry I really need to be able to fluidly and reliably send files and info about files.
One problem that belongs to this category that I am experiencing is an inability to rename or at least tag photos with identifying keywords. What if a client or coworker needs a bunch of info that can easily be communicated with photos, but you need to organize them somewhat before sending? You are stuck with a mess of generic names and a bunch of recommendations online for paid apps.
I will say this:
If there is no way for me to rename my own photo files for absolutely free, no strings attached, I am definitely returning the phone on principle! Isn't there at least a free app for this? I am amazed at how unsuccessful my attempts to find one have been so far

Hi,
First, it is a fundamental characteristic of iOS to have no access or control over files. The very concept of this mobile OS is based on Apps and not files.
Given said this, your post appears really strange to me. If you do work as a professional in film industries, please tell me you don't rely only an iPhone camera for pictures and movies! It's definetively not intended for that. Even I, who's only an amateur, use external softwares to manage libraries and do modification like Aperture or iMovies.
If you want to edit movies/picture took externally and sync to your iPhone, then, you must edit with the software initially used. If you want to edit movies/picture took with your iPhone, then don't mention you are a professional and like anyone, pay for iPhoto or iMovies.
Mobiles devices are based on the idea of paying per function cheap and small softwares. A couple of dollards for usefull features should not raise concern up to returning the hardware. It's more probable that you were looking at the wrong hardware in the first place to fullfill your needs.
And I can tell you, even on a Nikon camera, I don't change Tag nor files names and I'm only an amateur. You should rethink your process flow.

UK Payroll EOY changes

Hi All
Could you please share the UK PAYE EOY functional changes for 12-13.
Thanks
Sumesh

Check with your previous functional consultant, he should be able to tell regular issues related to your package. Generally once SAP is fully set up and running for some months you may not get problem from SAP config related issues. Mostly issues are with related to processes.
If you want us to give more suggestions on process related issues and may be you need to paste all process of your organization or tell us where you are working so may be if some one already have idea about that company could tell you more.
Hope above information is useful.
Manoj Shakya

R/3 we have partnerfunctions maintained manually which need flow to CRM.

Hi Guys,
We have a scenario where the R/3 partner functions have to flow to CRM.
In the R/3 System we have partnerfunctions maintained manually which neednot be a business partner and this information has to flow to CRM.
Ex: A customer "20000" has a Partner function sold to party ID 20000 , and for this customer we are maintaining manually in Partner tab different value 20001 as a payes (Partner function)
Now in the CRM the partner functions flow as relationships, So If there is no actual business partner assigned and only a manually entered Number is present in the Partner function? Is there a possiblity to send the same to the CRM system.
How does it maps in the CRM system
Regards.
BNP

Hi BNP,
Did you tried performing initial load of CUSTOMER_REL object? It should pull the partner functions to CRM.
Instead of doing the complete load, first try with one or two customers into CRM. It should work.
//Bhanu

Private - encapsulation or inheritance (but not both)

Suppose that your class has some internal computation or logic that it performs, and that you wish to encapsulate this in a method that can not be called by other classes.
You provide public methods that filter, format, or somehow modify the input and/or output of this encapsulated method.
class pseudoCodeClass {
private coreLogic(Objects inputs) {
Maybe some complicated math stuff;
Or password stuff;
Or pay out functionality for a slot machine;
return(stuff);
public getUserData(inputs) {
format/check the inputs;
coreLogic(inputs);
format the output;
Now, how do you leveradge the power of OO inheritance to extend the internal logic that you encapsulated? If you make the interal logic private, then it's encapsulated, but you lose the power of OO inheritance, or you can make it protected and lose the encapsulation. I thought an OO language was supposed to have encapsulation and inheritance, not encapsulation or inheritance. (And, yes I realize that there is some techincal sense in which private methods are still inherited, but I'm talking about the general OO concept of inheritence where it includes overriding or extending.)
Suppose you want to:
class pseudoCodeSubclass extends pseudoCodeClass {
private coreLogic(inputs) {
super.coreLogic(inputs);
additional more specific code; // The whole point of OO inheritence
You can't extend super.coreLogic through your access to super.getUserData because it does all sorts of filtering and formating that is not a part of the internal logic that you wish to extend/override. And, providing other more public accessor methods to the core logic just defeats the encapsulation.
I have seen many discussions of this, but none with any answers to my satisfaction. One line of answers is that you don't want encapsulated stuff to be part of your object's contract. Some times people with this sort of answer even suggest coppying the code from the super class into the subclass. People with this sort of answer don't seem to even want the option to use inheritence because of the obligation that might go with it. But without the option of inheriting encapsulated logic, they are forced to either use cut and paste (in an OO language that seems wrong to me) or to abandon encapsulation all together. Being forced into those 2 extreems doesn't seem to me like it would simplify future support of your class, and future support seems to be the primary point of the contract line of response.
The way some people argue about this, I amost want to say - Look! In C you can encapsulate everything you want, and never have to worry about inheritance. (But you still shouldn't have to cut and paste.)
Another line of response that I have seen is that private methods should only be used in breaking up code that would have gone into a single method. In other words, the private methods aren't really 'units of program logic' they are just a mater of organizational convenience. So if you had:
public oneBigMessyMethod() {
100 lines of A;
100 lines of B;
100 lines of C;
you could maintain it as:
public oneBigMessyMethod() {
a();
b();
c();
private a() {
100 lines of A;
private b() {
100 lines of B;
private c() {
100 lines of C;
I agree private works well in this situation. Presumably since a(), b() and c() are divided up for convenience rather than because of distinct logical function, you wouldn't want to extend just a() with inheritance. But this also seems to dodge the question. Just because sometimes you might not want encapsulated functionality to be available for extention, does not mean that you would never want it. I think that I'd also have to disagree with the permise that encapsulation is only for hiding stuff that is just a convention of convenience. The main point of encapsulation is to hide information or functionality. If encapsulation is only used for the convenient breakdown of your primary functionality, then all of your primary functionality is public, package or protected. That does make it inheritable. But, now all of the primary functionality is a part of the contract for that class.
Is there an answer to this issue that does not ignore the value of either encapsulation or inheritance?
There is one way that I can see to do exactly what I think should be possible. That is to put only classes from the same hierarchy in a package. Then both package and protected effectively provide encapsulation with the ability to inherit (and you do still have the option to use private or final if there is a case where you want to disable inheritence).
What I'd like to know is - What do people actually do? In the real world, do people:
1) use private + cut and paste
2) use package/protected + self discipline
Where 2 is that you drop encapsulation within your package but then excercise self dicipline and just don't call/access stuff that you intend to be for that class only...
Or is there some 3rd thing that I'm missing? I've tried to think how maybe you could design your objects in such a way that you'd never need to inherit/extend something that you would also want to encapsulate. But I just don't see how that's possbile.
So, what do people do?
Chris

First of all, you have got to understand that I am not
suggesting that Private and Final should be changed or
removed from java. It looks to me like there should
be an additional access option (and there was
originaly).
I understand that if a class inherits something, it
could expand the access or put public accessor methods
around it. Obviously with ultra sensitive code this
would be a nightmare. So private and final are very
important. But if the very possibility of another
class expanding a given level of access is a reason
for not even having that level of access, then why do
we have package and protected?
There are a great number of places in common coding where that access does restrict usage in a usable way.
>
If the only re-use of your code that you allow is
through the public interface, what do you even need an
OO language for? Just for the polymorphism and a
different way to organize your code?
Not sure what you mean by that but see below.
But as I've said. I've seen this whole thing argued a
number of times. But what I haven't seen is any
explanation of what people who take the poslition that
I'm taking actually do when they write code. Because
I can sit here with a bunch of other people and say 'I
wish Java had this or that'. And then of couse a
bunch of people will resopond and say 'no that's dumb'
or 'I don't see the point'. But at the end of the
day, Java still is what it is. So, arguing about what
it 'should be' is not going to effect how anyone
codes.
Sure it can. That is why java now has assert().
So, what I started out wanting to know is how people
actually code. Particularly people who wish that Java
had a subclass only access modifier.
I don't wish that.
Perhapse I should also be asking about how things are
done by people who see this level of access as
unnececary. How they code is easy enough to
understand. Making everything that is not intended to
be accessed by any other class private is easy enough
to do. But what would be interesting to know is how
do you design your classes to leveradge inheritance if
you do this. Maybe there is some way of desinging
around ever having 'internal functionality' that you
would want to extend and I'm just not getting it.
There are three broad classifications of objects.
1. Those that only use encapsulation
2. Correct inheritence hierarchies
3. Incorrect inheritence hierarchies
The first of those, which I consider most classes to fall into, do not need this.
The third area occurs when programmers use inheritence as a convenience mechanism to propogate behavior amoung different classes rather than using encapsulation as should be done. They don't understand the difference between "is-a" relationships (design) and coding convienence. I would estimate that at least 50% of existing object hierarchies fall into this area. Since in this case the entire design is wrong an extension is not needed.
The second area is the only correct area where this might be needed. Since I personally believe that very few classes belong in hierarchies and this proposed extension would only be useful in a sub fraction of those. Since the correct usage is so small I don't think it would be useful addition to the language.

SSHR - MSS ICD (Individual comp Distr) if chained in Hire workflow commits

hello -
I have inlcuded the ICD(Individual Compensation Distribution) workflow function inside the seeded Hire workflow processes.
the seeded sequence is -
Emp Details > Asg Details > Pay Rate > Change Manager > Review
I have customized it to -
Emp Details > Asg Details > Pay Rate > ICD> Change Manager > Review
However, I as soon as I am moving from the pay rate page to the ICD page, the data is committed to the tables and there is a row in the per_all_people_f table with null employee number. The same behavior is replicated if ICD is after the change manager function. Upon submitting the workflow background process, the a new row in person table is getting generated with a valid employee number.
Please advise whether I am making some error in the chaining process , or do we need to set up some attributes differently to prevent this commit. Or is this a bug with Oracle.
Page 8 of chapter 1 ( Page 40 in document SSHR User guide version 4.2 ) says that ICD workflow is chainable, hence I am trying to chain this function in the Hire Process between the pay rate function & Change Manager Function.
Edited by: Tushar Kumar on Jan 26, 2010 2:33 PM

Hi Vinayaka -
Thanks for your reply. It does provide me some insight into the reasons for this behavior, however when I searched for the participation process requests submitted in the last 2 days, I could not find any request related to the participation process.
Also, I tried to include the ICD in the Worker Status Change ( WSC ) Process, and it works perfectly fine there. If the participation process runs in commit mode, then half of the data entered in the pages prior to the ICD page should be committed, is this not correct ? But in WSC, it does not commit the data.
Hence, I am not too sure whether this is the intended functionality or whether it could be a bug.
Please do let me know your thoughts.
Thanks
Tushar

Add Notes to initial UDM_SPECIALIST screen

Hi Credit and Collections & ABAP experts,
When running the UDM_SPECIALIST transaction to see the Worklist it is not possible to see any of the NOTES maintained on that customer. Each individual customer must be drilled into then the Customer Contact tab and here a From Date specified before a listing of past NOTE history can be viewed. We would like to be able to view any Notes linked to a customer in the initial woklist screen.
We have seen BAdi UDM_WL_ITEM_CREATE_C. Here the parameter I_PARTNER gives access to all the transaction data linked to the Business Partner with interface IF_UDM_BUPA_TRANSACTION_DATA.
can you advise if it is possible, what steps to follow to get the Note history of a Business Partner and present this as a selection on the initial UDM_SPECIALIST screen?
Thanks for any ideas.
Michael

Hi Mark,
We do already have the EHP5 installed. This des give us access to create Notes. The problem is that UDM_SPECIALIST first presents an overview of customer data on the initial screen. The user must then drill into each customer to see the detailed lines (ie invoices) making up the customer total and at that level is then prompted to create a note (eithe on a Resubmission, Promise-To-Pay, Dispute, or simply when they try to exit the detailed list level the system will prompt to enter a Note).
The Notes are therefore stored at the detailed line level but are not visible from the initial overview screen. It means the user must drill into each customer and then click theCustomer Contacts tab and enter a date range to view the Note History. This takes consdierable time especially when there are multiple customers involved. Previously in legacy the user maintained a customer detailed list in Excel sheet with a column for all contacts/notes so the history was immediately visible to the user without having to drill into the line level.
Is there any way that this Note history can be displayed on the initial overview screen, and/or make some of the Resubmission, Promise-To-Pay, Dispute functions available at the Overview List level? Or is it the case that the SAP component desgin must always be bsed on this overview list/detailed list split?
Thanks for any advice you can give here.

Activateion of application area (FI-CA)

We have activated FI-CA in our test system (sandbox). The system ask us to also activate an application area (Under IMG: Finacial Accounting/Contrac Acc.Rec. Pay/Basic Functions/Application Area).
We need to know exactly what this activation means? The helptext does not give us an good answaer. What is the differences between *, R, S and T? We also need to know the impact on the other modules this activation has. Is it possible to "deactivate" or choose another area later?
Anyone who can help us?
Thanks in advance
Owe

Activating a component in SAP means you are making that component global, so that you r getting the latest version of the source code, activating the components means giving authorisation to the users of those components.
Regards:-
Santosh.D

Paying Foreign Currency Invoice with Functional Currency

Hi,
Can anyone advise if I am able to pay a foreign currency invoice
using functional currency in AP? Eg. if my functional currency
is USD and invoice is in GBP, how can I pay in USD against the
GBP invoice? Thank you and God bless you.

Most versions of Oracle Financial system, allows the payment of
Foreign Currency invoices in functional currency. If you tried
to pay the Foreign Currency invoices in functional currency, and
if you got error it could be due to of different reasons.
One very common reason, is the lack of (refer currency
conversion rate set up if you are not familiar) of a conversion
rate in the date range of the invoice.

How to set preferred currency in SSHR application in change pay function

In SSHR application-->change pay function
I would like to view salary components in preferred currency say INR.
Currently, it is in USD defaulted from business group.
Please let me how to do I do it.
Thanks in advance,
Nutan

HI,
I am encountering similar situation where we need 2 currencies to be processed in our SAP system.
What we intend to do is to have both currencies in Infotype 0008-Basic Salary where we can select whichever applies.
Unfortunately the currency is defaulted to RM for now.
I tried the suggested solution by trying to maintain a new entry of payscale group and level but the currency is defaulted to RM anyway.There's no way for us to change the RM to USD since it it following the country grouping i presume.
How should we go about this?
Thanks.
Regards,
Pat

I have a fully functioning iPhone 4S that has been in water, it has left slight water marks on screen, everything else works and is in mint condition. I want to exchange it for an iphone 5s and pay the difference. Would this be possible at the apple store

I have a fully functioning iPhone 4S in mint condition apart some water marks on screen (dropped in bath) everything works perfectly as it should. I wish to exchange and pay the difference for an iphone 5s. Is this possible from the apple store (uk) how much do they normally give as a trade in and how much do they charge for an iphone 5s. Or should I just take it in and see if they will do a one for one swap and pay the difference. ( I don't like the water marks, it's annoying, maybe they will go away, I don't know) been sat in rice for a week.

The only thing Apple will do for you is an out of warranty exchange, & you will get EXACTLY what you have now. The cost will be US $199. Make an appointment at any Apple store.

Why did carefully over heating my 4s restore the wifi function? This, after 2 months of mysteriously grey out wifi buttons, loads of time trying to resolve issue with apple tech only to be told I must pay $199 to repair the problem. I'm disillusioned now

Why did carefully over heating my 4s restore the wifi function? This, after 2 months of mysteriously grey out wifi buttons, loads of time trying to resolve issue with apple tech only to be told I must pay $199 to repair the problem. I'm disillusioned now

Is the Wi-Fi button greyed out? Try this article: http://support.apple.com/kb/TS1559
Also, make a backup to iTunes of the device. Then restore it as a new device. If you still have wi-fi greyed out, then contact Apple again, and explain that you believe you have a hardware issue. They may still ask for a $19 deposit, but if it is actually hardware related, then you won't be charged the $19. Only if it is software related do you get charged that $19.

Function Module Error In Uploading Data for Basic Pay Infotype

Hi All,
I'm trying to upload data into Basic Pay Infotype 0008 Using LSMW Subtype 0(Basic Contract). While we are trying to input values into ANSAL(Annual Salary) field directly using default wage type as 1000.
We are gettting a error in function module RP_ANSAL_FROM_WAGETYPES.
and eventhough we are inputting values into ANSAL field it is taking it as 0.00 by default .
Kidly suggest me solution.
Thanks,
Vasanth

Hi ..
check this
765785
673372
730976
note 1032950
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw2004s/helpdata/en/8d/3e4ec2462a11d189000000e8323d3a/content.htm
Message was edited by:
hari kv

Partner function in vendor account to pay two vendors(payee)

We have a Purchase vendor against whom we raise the invoice .However payment has to be made 50% to this vendor andanother 50% of the same invoice amount to another vendor.
Is it possible in partner function that we could have to payee vendors.How to make config for this or is there any other alternative.
Please advice.

Partner functionality does suppport the rquirement given.

Pay to Function

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for