Payment Grouping

Dear All,
We have defined the grouping key (based on currency 'WAERS-CURRECNY') in the vendor master record and the vendor has also a customer to the company.
We have two vendor invoices and one credit memo and the same time two customer invoice and one customer credit memo.
Once we run the F110, the system groups all the documents (Vendor invoice, customer invoice and vendor credit memo) in one line item (Payment Document) and except the customer credit memo. Because the customer credit memo has been posted in another line item (Payment Document) .
If we want to create one payment document for all the items (adjusting all debit and credits in single line), what additional settings needs to be done?
I request all please give your suggestions.
Regards,
Ran

Please run debit balance check using with below path
F110 > Edit >Proposal >Debit balance check
Rgds
Murali. N

Similar Messages

Error in PipelineManager while creating new payment group

Hi Everyone,
I am trying to create a new payment group for purchasing an item with the reward points. i am trying to modify the pipeline flow by overriding commercePipeline.xml. i have added the following lines of code in that xml.
commercepipeline.xml
<pipelinemanager>
<pipelinechain name="validatePaymentGroup">
<pipelinelink name="dispatchOnPGType">
    <transition returnvalue="5000"
      link="validatePointsPG" />
</pipelinelink>
<pipelinelink name="validatePointsPG"
    transaction="TX_MANDATORY">
     <processor jndi=
      "/com/mystore/order/processor/ValidatePointsPaymentGroup" />
</pipelinelink>
</pipelinechain>
<pipelinechain
name="validatePaymentGroupPreConfirmation">
<pipelinelink name="dispatchOnPGTypePreConfirmation">
    <transition returnvalue="5000"
     link="validatePointsPGPreConfirmation" />
</pipelinelink>
<pipelinelink name="validatePointsPGPreConfirmation"
   transaction="TX_MANDATORY">
     <processor jndi=
      "/com/mystore/order/processor/ValidatePointsPaymentGroup" />
</pipelinelink>
</pipelinechain>
</pipelinemanager>
when i am starting the server getting below error:
ERROR [nucleusNamespace.] Unable to start service "/atg/commerce/PipelineManager": atg.nucleus.ServiceException: CONTAINER:atg.service.pipeline.PipelineInitializationException; SOURCE:atg.service.pipeline.TransitionException: A PipelineLink is already mapped to return code [5000] in the pipelink named [dispatchOnPGType].
when i tried to check the commercepipeline in Dynamo Administration it is showing that the pipelinechain is locked
CommercePipelineManager
Pipeline Chains
Chain Id
Num Runners
Enabled
Locked
LockAcquiredTime
LockReleasedTime
LockingThread
validatePaymentGroup
0
false
true
Fri Jan 24 10:55:46 IST 2014
N/A
main
loadOrder
0
true
false
N/A
Fri Jan 24 10:55:44 IST 2014
N/A
updateOrder
0
true
false
N/A
Fri Jan 24 10:55:44 IST 2014
N/A
processOrder
0
true
false
N/A
Fri Jan 24 10:55:45 IST 2014
N/A
validateShippingGroup
0
true
false
N/A
Fri Jan 24 10:55:46 IST 2014
N/A
refreshOrder
0
true
false
N/A
Fri Jan 24 10:55:44 IST 2014
N/A
processOrderWithReprice
0
true
false
N/A
Fri Jan 24 10:55:44 IST 2014
N/A
repriceOrderForInvalidation
0
true
false
N/A
Fri Jan 24 10:55:44 IST 2014
N/A
validateForCheckout
0
true
false
N/A
Fri Jan 24 10:55:45 IST 2014
N/A
Thanks&Regards,
RKishore

U have assigned return code 5000 in both chain to ur new pipeline link.
OOTB 5000 is already assigned to invoice chain.
U need to change return code to new unassigned value.Also return code must be added in expected return codes in ValidatePaymentGroupByType component.
Refer this: Oracle ATG Web Commerce - Extending Order Validation to Support New Payment Methods
Thanks,
Nitin.

Not able to add a remaining order amount to a payment group

Hello all,
I've been writing a customized kind of PaymentFormHandler, which extends the PurchaseProcessFormHandler and implements the transaction pattern.
I'm getting an exception which I am currently not able tosolve. The important code section follows, the exception caught as well.
Does anyone have a tip on solving this problem? Any help is appreciated.
(Do not consider the comment and log lines in Portuguese)
// Adicionando o default
                              String nomePaymentGroupDefault = getPaymentGroupMapContainer()
                                        .getDefaultPaymentGroupName();
                              PaymentGroup paymentGroup = getPaymentGroupMapContainer()
                                        .getPaymentGroup(nomePaymentGroupDefault);
                              logDebug("adicionando o restante do valor do order ao "
                                        + nomePaymentGroupDefault + ", id: "
                                        + paymentGroup.getId());
                              try {
                                   getOrderManager()
                                             .addRemainingOrderAmountToPaymentGroup(
                                                       getOrder(), paymentGroup.getId());
                              } catch (CommerceException e) {
                                   tratarExcecoes(e);
CONTAINER:atg.commerce.order.InvalidParameterException: atg.commerce.order.OrderResources->InvalidPaymentGroupIdParameter
: Invalid PaymentGroup id parameter.; SOURCE:atg.commerce.order.PaymentGroupNotFoundException: atg.commerce.order.OrderRes
ources->PaymentGroupNotFound : PaymentGroup with id pg640003 is not in container.
at atg.commerce.order.PaymentGroupManager.getPaymentGroupOrderRelationship(PaymentGroupManager.java:731)
at atg.commerce.order.OrderManager.getPaymentGroupOrderRelationship(OrderManager.java:5021)
at atg.commerce.order.OrderManager.addRemainingOrderAmountToPaymentGroup(OrderManager.java:2066)
at passarela.web.pagamento.PagamentoFormHandler.handleEfetuarPagamento(PagamentoFormHandler.java:201)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39)
at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:597)
at atg.droplet.EventSender.sendEvent(EventSender.java:582)
at atg.droplet.FormTag.doSendEvents(FormTag.java:800)
at atg.droplet.FormTag.sendEvents(FormTag.java:649)
at atg.droplet.DropletEventServlet.sendEvents(DropletEventServlet.java:523)
Thanks a lot.

No, it is in the order. These two lines work correctly:
String nomePaymentGroupDefault = getPaymentGroupMapContainer()
.getDefaultPaymentGroupName();
PaymentGroup paymentGroup = getPaymentGroupMapContainer()
.getPaymentGroup(nomePaymentGroupDefault);
I'm able to retrieve the name of the default paymentGroup and, using the name, get the payment group itself.
The problem is when i call getOrderManager().addRemainingOrderAmountToPaymentGroup(getOrder(), paymentGroup.getId()) which throws the exception above.
The default group has been successfully created by a prior CreateCreditCardFormHandler.
Thanks.

The payment group could not be authorized for payment:

Hi All,
I am facing one issue when ever I try to submit the order.Mention issues log below.
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:619)
17:30:09,608 INFO [CommitOrderFormHandler] DEBUG Acquired local write lock using id 140023
17:30:09,631 INFO [CommitOrderFormHandler] DEBUG beforeSet created transaction TransactionImple < ac, BasicAction: -53edde10:dc90:51a34807:1077 status: ActionStatus.RUNNING >
17:30:09,632 INFO [CommitOrderFormHandler] DEBUG no form errors - staying on same page.
17:30:09,635 INFO [CommitOrderFormHandler] DEBUG no form errors - staying on same page.
17:30:09,637 INFO [CommitOrderFormHandler] DEBUG no form errors - staying on same page.
17:30:09,720 WARN [ValidatePaymentGroupByType] Returning default transition value 0 for unregistered property value cashOnDelivery.
17:30:09,763 INFO [CommitOrderFormHandler] DEBUG PipelineError: key=FailedPaymentGroupAuth:pg50002; error=The payment group pg50002 could not be authorized for payment: The given PaymentGroup {0} cannot be processed because a processor was not configured for its type..
17:30:09,763 INFO [CommitOrderFormHandler] DEBUG adding form exception: FailedPaymentGroupAuth:pg50002: The payment group pg50002 could not be authorized for payment: The given PaymentGroup {0} cannot be processed because a processor was not configured for its type..
17:30:09,764 INFO [CommitOrderFormHandler] DEBUG root cause of exception: null
17:30:09,764 INFO [CommitOrderFormHandler] DEBUG Transaction Marked as Rollback - redirecting to: error.jsp
17:30:09,765 INFO [CommitOrderFormHandler] DEBUG afterSet sees currentTransaction as TransactionImple < ac, BasicAction: -53edde10:dc90:51a34807:1077 status: ActionStatus.ABORT_ONLY >
17:30:09,765 INFO [CommitOrderFormHandler] DEBUG afterSet committing transaction TransactionImple < ac, BasicAction: -53edde10:dc90:51a34807:1077 status: ActionStatus.ABORT_ONLY >
17:30:09,766 INFO [CommitOrderFormHandler] DEBUG Released local write lock using id 140023
Could you please give suggestion how to resolve this issue.
Thanks,
Raj

It seems like you have created a new payment group cashOnDelivery but have not configured the required property files required for its validation
1) In /atg/commerce/order/processor/ValidatePaymentGroupByType.properties add something as following
# Add a return code for your cash payment method
returnValues+=\
cashOnDelivery=5051
2) then in CommercePipeline.xml add the mapping for the integer value specified earlier to its validator processor, something as following
<pipelinechain name="validatePaymentGroup" transaction="TX_REQUIRED" headlink="dispatchOnPGType" xml-combine="append">
<pipelinelink name="dispatchOnPGType" transaction="TX_MANDATORY">
<processor jndi="/atg/commerce/order/processor/ValidatePaymentGroupByType"/>
<transition link="validateCashPG" returnvalue="5051"/>
</pipelinelink>
<pipelinelink name="validateCashPG" transaction="TX_MANDATORY">
<processor jndi="/atg/commerce/order/processor/ValidateCash"/>
</pipelinelink>
</pipelinechain>
3) Create a new ValidateCash component and its class(which implements a pipeline processor) and in this simply return the SUCCESS code, or put any validation logic that you want to put for validating your new cash paymentGroup.
This would solve the the current error you are getting,
and If the PaymentManager, PaymentPipeline(The new createCahInfo and ProcessCash processor etc),OrderTools component etc have been confgiured properly for your new payment group then you should be able to submit the order.
Thanks

F110 -Too many payment mediums created for this payment group

Hello Gurus,
Am getting below error after executing payment run F110.
BFIBL02160 Too many payment mediums created for this payment group
BFIBL02616 End of log for payment run 20140409 / DPA04 , PE1 / 500
We are not able to see the Payment advice note in the spool request.
Can you please share your ideas to resolve the issue
Thanks in advacne

HI,
Please let us know for account like vendor , customer you running the payment advice.
check if the customer ,vendor document is posted or not.
which customer, vendor number you had maintained in the f110 .
check that before you run it.
else.. create new document and start run the payment.
for single document fi you try more than once it will give the above error.
and also the check the program and variant as well.
let me know any corrections.
thanks.

DMEE error (Error Log - Too many payment mediums created for this payment group)

Hi Experts,
Please see the below error while generating the DMEE file.
Error Log - Too many payment mediums created for this payment group
Error is - Too many payment mediums created for this payment group
Please explain how to resolve this error.Send detail documentation how to rectify this error
Regards
Sreedhar

Hi Nimish Agarwal,
With reference to the error faced i.e. BFIBL02160 "too many payment
mediums created for this payment group", please review the information
provided in the long text of this error in detail.
Please ensure that the orders are not carried out several times.
Alternatively you can apply the optional usable message 166 (same
class: BFIBL02), so that you can prevent creating duplicates in future.
Please customize this message as an error so as to prevent the system
from creating duplicate files. You can customize this message in OBA5.
The message BFIBL02 160 always occurs, if you create more than one
file for the same payment run, in order to warn you not to send the
same file twice to the bank.
The SAPFPAYM program does not create 2 files at once. But if you
run this program more than once for the same payment run, more than
one file is created. From the second run on you receive the error
message BFIBL02 160. You can easily test it, by creating a new
payment proposal and creating a new file with this proposal and
SAPFPAYM. The first time you run this program you will not receive
the message.
Hope this clarifies.
Kind Regards,
Fernando Evangelista

Event for payment grouping

Dear all,
In which event in we can able change the value of field 'PYGRP' payment grouping in the table dfkkop in invoicing process. I have worked on event 600 but it doesn't make sense to our requirement.
Susmita
Edited by: susmitha harini on Sep 10, 2010 8:03 AM
Edited by: susmitha harini on Sep 10, 2010 8:05 AM

Dear susmitha,
Not sure what the requirement is but I would advise you to review note 568966 especially item 6 & 8:
6. Payment group (DFKKOP-PYGRP)
This is a freely selectable grouping field with 10 places that can be set during the posting/changing of a document. Thus items with different contents in this field are paid separately; items with the same contents in this field can be paid together if all other conditions mentioned here are also fulfilled. In certain cases the system sets the payment group within the program in order to group items together that were announced together or assigned together. For that purpose special payment groups, which start with special characters "/" and "&", are used.
8. Payment group (PAYGR) from event 0600
This is a freely selectable field with 50 places that can be set at event 0600. A typical application is a logic for which the payment group is equal to the contract number if "Individual payment" is selected in the contract.
regards,
David

Error Log - Too many payment mediums created for this payment group

Hi Experts,
When I am doing payment to customers through T-code F110, I am able to clear the open item. But when we are executing the Payment medium - DME Administration, generate the Payment Advice and when we see the print preview of the Payment Advice in spool request, System is showing the following errors,
"BFIBL02160 Too many payment mediums created for this payment group"
"BFIBL02616 End of log for payment run 20120123 / NAA02 , NSD / 200"
"This is line 1/column 45 on page 1"
Message no. SP01R116
Kindly help how to rectify the same
Thanks in advance
Regards,
Nimish Agarwal

Hi Nimish Agarwal,
With reference to the error faced i.e. BFIBL02160 "too many payment
mediums created for this payment group", please review the information
provided in the long text of this error in detail.
Please ensure that the orders are not carried out several times.
Alternatively you can apply the optional usable message 166 (same
class: BFIBL02), so that you can prevent creating duplicates in future.
Please customize this message as an error so as to prevent the system
from creating duplicate files. You can customize this message in OBA5.
The message BFIBL02 160 always occurs, if you create more than one
file for the same payment run, in order to warn you not to send the
same file twice to the bank.
The SAPFPAYM program does not create 2 files at once. But if you
run this program more than once for the same payment run, more than
one file is created. From the second run on you receive the error
message BFIBL02 160. You can easily test it, by creating a new
payment proposal and creating a new file with this proposal and
SAPFPAYM. The first time you run this program you will not receive
the message.
Hope this clarifies.
Kind Regards,
Fernando Evangelista

Pay Pal payment Group not saved to order if Gift Card is being used.

In my application I have credit card, pay pal and gift card payment types.
Each of these types work just fine on their own.
I can get credit card and gift card payment groups to show up on a single order, but for some reason when doing a pay pal and gift card combo, only the gift card is showing up. The pay pal processor chain is not being kicked off. No errors are being thrown.
Here is the chain if that helps:
<pipelinemanager>
     <pipelinechain name="payPalProcessorChain" transaction="TX_REQUIRED" headlink="createPayPalInfo">
     <pipelinelink name="createPayPalInfo" transaction="TX_MANDATORY">
     <processor jndi="/atg/commerce/payment/processor/ProcCreatePayPalInfo"/>
     <transition returnvalue="1" link="processPayPal"/>
     </pipelinelink>
     <pipelinelink name="processPayPal" transaction="TX_MANDATORY">
          <processor jndi="/atg/commerce/payment/processor/ProcProcessPayPal"/>
          </pipelinelink>
     </pipelinechain>
     <pipelinechain name="giftCardProcessorChain" transaction="TX_REQUIRED" headlink="createGiftCardInfo">
          <pipelinelink name="createGiftCardInfo" transaction="TX_MANDATORY">
               <processor jndi="/atg/commerce/payment/processor/ProcCreateGiftCardInfo"/>
               <transition returnvalue="1" link="processGiftCard"/>
          </pipelinelink>
          <pipelinelink name="processGiftCard" transaction="TX_MANDATORY">
               <processor jndi="/atg/commerce/payment/processor/ProcProcessGiftCard"/>
          </pipelinelink>
     </pipelinechain>
</pipelinemanager>

The problem here was the way the PayPal logic is created and used. So a rewrite of the logic to use OTB ATG best practices - piepline processors was done to address the issue

Add new payment group to order.

I want to add extra payment group to order.I can use order.addpaymentgroup and addrelationship.is this right approach?
I read somewhere it's not good approach to add relationship this way.
Please ssuggest how can i add new payment group to order.

You dont need to create the relationship explicitly. OrderManager, PaymentGroupManager, CommerceItemManager etc gives some method to support split payment groups and that will create the relationship.
For example, in case if you want to use half of the order amount to one Payment Group called PG1 and remaining to PG2, you can use the below approach.
OrderManager.addOrderAmountToPaymentGroup(Order, PG1.id (payment group id), amount), this method will create a relationship and assign the amount to that payment group.
Next, you need to set the remaining amount to PG2,
OrderManager.addRemainingItemAmountToPaymentGroup(Order, PG2.id), this will add the remaining amount to PG2 and create the relationship.
Similiar methods are available in the manager classes mentioned above, check API docs for details.
Cheers
R

Authorizing payment groups in atg

Hi Guys,
what is the main reason for authorize PaymentGroups in atg
I have little bit confusion on this
Please give me some idea on authorize ,credit and debit of payment groups
why we should do these?

After order submission, Fulfillment System is responsible for deducting the money when it's processing the order, ie. normally at the time of shipping.
Before that If we accept the money and something goes wrong we may need to credit it to customer account.(crediting to customer account is verified manually, So lots of efforts are needed here).Even if say it's automated, Normally it take 10 days to return money. Customer Dissatisfaction.We didn't give him the item and taken his money too for 10 days.
So Amount deduction is postponed till the last, so that effort in crediting can be reduced.
Now coming to checkout Page when user submits card details, U won't want user order to be successful if card details are invalid.
it will increase load on fulfillment system.
it will cause customer dissatisfaction, may be by mistake he entered some card details wrong.His order will be delayed since he need to provide those details again.(I think Amazon offers u to change payment mode, even after submitting order before processing is not done)
So card authorization is needed on checkout page, so that error message can be shown to user and he can enter details again.
Process followed:
Authorization Process: Once order is submitted, we authorize the amount by calling external system web service and they provide us authorization code
Debit Process: At the time of order processing by fulfillment system, We deduct the money with help of authorization code.
Credit Process: If at any time we need to cancel the order, We return the money with help of authorization code.
FYI- I have taken example of credit card payment group, process will get changed for other payment groups, say stored Points. no need for external verification.Still in this case we try to follow the same process.
Thanks,
Nitin.

Payment group

Hi All,
What is the transaction code for Payment group of the company code?
Regards,
Swetha

Hello,
If you were talking about Payment grouping, please check the SAP note 305414. This is a consulting note explaining
the grouping of payment in the automatic payment program.
REgards,
REnan

F110 - Grouping of downpayment with invoice

Hi SAP gurus,
For a vendors , we have downpayment for 20000 and invoice for 10000. Both the downpayment and invoice have same due date. We have also configured that the sp Gl indicator allowed for payment in FBZP.
So when we run the APP , the system is processing 10000 invoice line item and 20000 downpayment is in exception list. Ideally the system should not clear any of line items as debit is more that credit. Please let me how to solve this issue??
Even in vendor master data, we have not ticked individual payment.
Please help

Check the Payment grouping in config.
Also make sure that this grouping is specified in the Vendor Master
Define Payment Groupings
In this activity you define the grouping keys that are used to settle a customer or vendor's open items together. For each key, you specify a maximum of three fields from the database tables BSIK (vendors) or BSID (customers). Items containing the same entries in the specified fields are settled together. You determine the grouping key used to group together the open items of a customer/vendor by entering this grouping key in the customer/vendor master record.
Example
If you have installed SAP's loans management system (currently being developed), you can use the grouping key to carry out bank collection at the customer, separated according to loan numbers.
Note
If an alternative payee is specified in the master record of the customer/vendor, the grouping key of the payee is used. When clearing between customers and vendors takes place, the key in the vendor master record has priority.
Activities
1. Define the required grouping keys.
2. Ensure that the grouping keys are entered in the customer/vendor master records

Payment Rule maintenance per currency in Bank Communication Management

Hi,
We have maintained Rules for Payment Grouping in Bank Communication Management based on amount limits. The basic currency we expected is GBP so we have the same set of amount limits for all Company Codes until now.
We've now introduced a new Company Code which makes payments in USD. We'd like the same amount limits to be used for payments from this Company Code too.
Eg: We have a rule for amount range from 100K to 150K. If the payment is in GBP the rule gets picked up if the payment amount is between 100K GBP and 150K GBP.
Now if a USD payment is made of 130K USD, the above rule gets picked up. We would like to see that the GBP equivalent of 130K USD... i.e. 205K USD is considered as the amount and a suitable rule is picked up.
How do we achieve this in the rule definitions? I see that the Currency field limits the rule to be considered only for payments made in one currency. Is there a way of associating the amount limits to a base currency so that other currency payments will get converted against this currency and be evaluated?
Would appreciate any help in this regard as we're at a loss currently.
Thanks in advance.
Madhu

HI
Can you verify your payment run log? are there any payments available or not
Reg
Vishnu

Payment Run Program (FPY1)

Hello Experts,
I am trying to understand payment run process (FPY1) and outbound direct debit file generation using standard transactions. We are using NACHA defined ACH format (which is a standard format used by US based banks). I found below event Modules for Payment Medium Formats: FKK_PAYMEDIUM_ACH_00, FKK_PAYMEDIUM_ACH_20, FKK_PAYMEDIUM_ACH_30, FKK_PAYMEDIUM_ACH_40. Unfortunately I am not able to determine their usefulness.
As per my understanding FPY1 updates DPAYH table and then run program "SAPFKPY3" to generate a file but then whats the use of function modules mentioned above?
Also, when I ran "SAPFKPY3" it generated message saying "Format ACH: No payment mediums created - No payment media were created for payment group 0 for format ACH." I am damn sure I am missing something, but don't know what.
Any suggestions would be of great help. Thanks.
Kind Regards,
Nikhil J.

Hi Nikhil,
The FMs that you have mentioned in your post are used to create the ACH format file that is send to the banks.
FKK_PAYMEDIUM_ACH_20-For File Header
FKK_PAYMEDIUM_ACH_30-For Batch header
FKK_PAYMEDIUM_ACH_40-For Payment Details
You can view these FMs by going to Transaction Code-FQP3. Select in the ACH format and clicking on "Event Module for Payment medium formats.
So, the ACH file that gets created during the FPY1 run is actually done by the standard program SAPFKPY3 with the help of these preconfigured FM's linked to the ACH payment medium format.
Now to the error that you are getting.Firstly Check whether the payment proposal list is getting generated or not.
If the payment proposal is not there, then there is some basic problem in the configuration settings.
(a) Check the company code for which you are running the FPY1 run, is the Payment medium linked with that in the config.
IMG->Financial Accounting->Contract Accounts Receivable and Payable->Payments->Incoming/Outgoing Payment Creation->
Define Payment Methods
IMG->Financial Accounting->Contract Accounts Receivable and Payable->Payments->Incoming/Outgoing Payment Creation->
Define Specifications for Paying Company Code
If the payment proposal is there, then the problem is only there in the payment medium format.
(a) Check the FM's are linked to the ACH format in FQP3.
(b) Note 1064779 also involves some manual activities to be performed apart from the code changes.
The manual activites are as follows and has to be perfomed one after another.
Hope it helps....
Thanks,
Amlan

Payment Grouping

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for