Performance in SSRS

Hi i has a Report which pulls 900 records from a 5 million Data set.
Actually i have tuned my Stored Procedure.While running the Sp against SQL SERVER Database it was taking only few sec(4) but when i run that Report which uses that SP it was taking almost 45 sec to show up the data on report manager.
In this case how can i tune in Report Manger.Why the both times are different?

Hi -
Is your stored procedure using parameters from the report?
If so, then I had a similar experience.  I'd run the stored proc and it would run in a few seconds when running via SSMS...but then the report would take forever (or very close!) to run.
As it turned out the problem had to do with a poor/incorrect execution plan being used because of parameter sniffing.  Try google (or bing)  sql server stored procedure and parameter sniffing.  
Basically, what I had to do (and you might too) is to spoof the parameters in the stored proc.
So, instead of this:
Create Procedure MyProc
@Param1 datetime
, @Param2 nvarchar(50)
AS
Declare @MyParam1 datetime = @Param1
Declare @MyParam2 nvarchar(50) = @Param2
SELECT Column1, Column2
FROM dbo.Table1 t
Where t.Column1 = @MyParam1
And t.Column2 = @MyParam2
I had to do this...and the results were great...back to excellent performance for the query:
Create Procedure MyProc
  @Param1 datetime
, @Param2 nvarchar(50)
AS
Declare @MyParam1 datetime = @Param1
Declare @MyParam2 nvarchar(50) = @Param2
SELECT Column1, Column2
FROM  dbo.Table1 t
Where  t.Column1 = @MyParam1
And    t.Column2 = @MyParam2
Hope this helps.
 - will
- will

Similar Messages

  • Performance with SSRS on Sharepoint

    Hi,
    Environment: Sharepoint 2010, SSRS deployed in Share Point integrated mode.
    Problem: Performance of page load with ssrs reports
    I have a Share Point page which displays 10 SSRS report, SSRS reports only contains 1 graph each. SSRS graph are displayed on sharepoint using a custom Web part. Report url is passed to webpart and it renders the report. Sharepoint page act as an dashboard.
    Data points:
    Sharepoint page takes 1 sec to load without any SSRS report on it. So I guess everything is fine from SharePoint configuration perspective
    With 1 report on page, load time is 6sec
    With 2 reports on page, load time is 8 sec
    With 3 reports on page, load time is 12 sec
    With all 10 reports, load time is 22 sec
    SSRS reports are very small and none of the proc used inside them takes more than 2 sec to pull data. Though reports take ,
     5-6 sec when opened from report library.
    I have checked all my system parameter CPU,Memory, network, all are fine.
    I have tried to load custom webparts asynchronously  using
    AsyncRendering="True",
    the page header loads in 1 sec but report loading happens sequencely(one after one) and still take 22 sec to complete page load. During 22 sec loaded reports are visible in grey and become active after complete page load.
    What steps can be taken to improve page load time.
    TIA
    Rahul Kumar, MCTS, India, http://sqlserversolutions.blogspot.com/

    Hi,
    In SharePoint Server 2010, there are certain limits that are by design and cannot be exceeded, including page.
    You can take a look at the documentation below about
    SharePoint Server 2010 capacity management: Software boundaries and limits:
    http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc262787(v=office.14).aspx#Page
    As your test result suggests, when there are many reports display in one page, the performance would be affected significantly.
    A workaround is that we can optimize the report processing to shorten the time of page loading.
    The documentation below will provide some
    Design Tips for Optimizing Report Processing:
    http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb522806(v=sql.105).aspx#Tips
    Another suggestion is that you can try to split the reports into different pages based on the real business need and perform page redirection for a better performance.
    Thanks
    Patrick Liang
    Forum Support
    Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help and unmark them if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Subscriber Support, contact
    [email protected]
    Patrick Liang
    TechNet Community Support

  • 2014 SSRS Reports Performance issues

    Hi All,
    After upgrading SQL 2008 reports to SQL 2014 i observed there is performance lag in 2014 ssrs reports,
    2008 reports which used to render in <2 secs now taking >50 secs,
    After doing some checks on why this lag occurred, i found that this is because of the expressions in reports, If i remove all the expressions then report renders < 2 secs otherwise its taking >50 secs 
    My question here is, we used the same expressions in 2008 version also which displays the report in <2 secs but why same thing taking more time in 2014 version.
    Is expressions handling in 2008 and 2014 different.
    and below are the expressions used in the both the versions
    IIF(ISNOTHING(Fields!Comp.Value),"-",Fields!Comp.Value) 
    IIF(ISNOTHING(Fields!Base.Value),"-",Fields!Base.Value)
    IIF(ISNOTHING(Fields!Var.Value),"-",Fields!Var.Value)
    iif(Fields!check.Value=true,"yellow","Transparent")
    Thanks in advance 
    Chandra.

    Hi Chandra,
    According to your description, the same report render slower in SQL Server 2014 than in SQL Server 2008.
    In both SSRS 2008 and SSRS 2014, the expression is processed in the same way. In Reporting Services, the total time to generate a report include TimeDataRetreval, TimeProcessing and TimeRendering. To analyze which section take much time, we can check the
    table Executionlog3 in the ReportServer database. For more information, Please refer to this article:
    More tips to improve performance of SSRS reports.
    After check out which section costs most of time, then you can refer to this article to optimize your report:
    Troubleshooting Reports: Report Performance.
    If possible, please share some information about your report migration.
    Best regards,
    Qiuyun Yu
    Qiuyun Yu
    TechNet Community Support

  • Report Performance Issue and Strange Execution Log Data

    Today we have had a report suddenly start taking a long time to execute.
    Looking at the Report Server executionLog3 table/view we have the following information for the query in question. 
     <Connection>
          <ConnectionOpenTime>1</ConnectionOpenTime>
          <DataSets>
            <DataSet>
              <Name>ReportDataset</Name>
              <RowsRead>7</RowsRead>
              <TotalTimeDataRetrieval>150013</TotalTimeDataRetrieval>
              <ExecuteReaderTime>3</ExecuteReaderTime>
            </DataSet>
          </DataSets>
        </Connection>
    Supposedly the time taken to retrieve the data is around 150 seconds.  However, running a profiler trace while running the report in SSRS shows the query executing in under 1 second.  
    Indeed running a profiler trace for anything on the server with a duration greater than 60 seconds isn't returning anything.  I can only assume the above data is wrong when it says 150 seconds to retrieve the data.  IT IS taking that long to run
    the report though - so the question is - where is the time going? 
    Why can't I find a slow query on the server but SSRS thinks there is? 
    LucasF
    EDIT: This was fixed by restarting the report server.  Any ideas on why this might occur? 

    Hi Lucas,
    According to your description, you find the <TotalTimeDataRetrieval> in ExecutionLog3 is larger than the profiler trace time.
    In Reporting Services, to analyze the performance of the report, we usually check the TimeDataRetrieval to find the time we spend on retrieving the data. It’s the time needed for SQL Server to retrieve the data of all datasets in your report. So in your
    scenario, please check if the TimeDataRetrieval is equal to the time in profiler trace.
    Reference:
    More tips to improve performance of SSRS reports
    If you have any question, please feel free to ask.
    Best regards,
    Qiuyun Yu
    Qiuyun Yu
    TechNet Community Support

  • Tabular Model Performance Improvements

    Hi !
    We have a bulitv tabular model inline which has a fact table and 2 dimension tables .The performance of SSRS report is very slow and we have bottle neck in deciding SSRS as reporting tool.
    Can you help us on performance improvements with Tabular Inline
    Regards,

    Hi Bhadri,
    As Sorna said, it hard to give you the detail tips to improve the tabular model performance according the limited information. Here are some useful link about performance Tuning of Tabular Models in SQL Server 2012 Analysis Services, please refer to the
    link below.
    http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dn393915.aspx
    If this is not what you want, please elaborate the detail information, so that we can make further analysis.
    Regards,
    Charlie Liao
    TechNet Community Support

  • SSRS 2012. ReportServer takes long time to be up.

    SSRS 2012 Sp1
    Hi guys,
    I am using SSRS as my reporting platform, but I have always got the following issue.
    SSRS ReportServer takes time to load.
    The first time takes long, then less time but only if the ReprotServer web page is continuosly retrived.
    HERE the problem:
    If the ReprotServer page is not used after a short time (let me say 10 min), the page takes long time to be up again.
    I have checked the configuration that is set as for default 12 hours.
    Is there a way to speed up the ReportServer opening page time?
    Thanks for your help 

    Hi Fasttrack2,
    According to your description, you want to optimize the performance of your report. Right?
    In this scenario, when your report page is not active for a short time, it will take long time to render again. This is because the you have the report timeout. You can select "Do not timeout report" in Processing. Please refer to the link below:
    SQL Server Reporting Services – Timeout Settings
    For the performance issue, it can be many reason cause the report running slowly. Please refer to the articles below to optimize the report:
    More tips to improve performance of SSRS reports.
    Reporting Services Performance and Optimization
    Troubleshooting Reports: Report Performance
    If you have any question, please feel free to ask.
    Best Regards,
    Simon Hou

  • Accessing Active Risk Manager (ARM) folder security markings through Risk Performance Manager

    Hello folks,
    I am building custom reports in RPM to display ARM data but am struggling to get a security label assigned to the reports.
    In the standard reports the security label changes according to the risks inputted but I can't see the wood for the trees in the expression used!
    Any hints or tips?
    Many thanks,
    Christian

    Hi sea_lene,
    In Reporting Services, each subreport instance is a separate query execution and a separate report processing task. So it the performance should be an issue. To improve the performance, we can consider changing the dataset query in the main report by using
    one of the following mitigation strategies:
    Collect data in a data warehouse and use the data warehouse as a data source for a single dataset.
    Use SQL Server linked servers and write a query that retrieves data from multiple databases.
    Use the OPEN ROWSET capability to specify different databases.
    References:
    Troubleshooting Reports: Report Performance
    More tips to improve performance of SSRS reports
    Hope this helps.
    Thanks,
    Katherine Xiong
    Katherine Xiong
    TechNet Community Support

  • How to find bottleneck in pivot query

    I have the following table and query I am running against that table.
    CREATE TABLE StagingTable(
    DateKey int NOT NULL,
    VersionNumber smallint NOT NULL,
    SetID varchar(10) NULL,
    ClassID char(5) NULL,
    VariableName varchar(50) NULL,
    VariableDescription varchar(255) NULL,
    PeriodNumber int NULL,
    PeriodData decimal(18, 6) NULL,
    Column1 varchar(50) NULL,
    Column2 varchar(50) NULL,
    Column3 varchar(50) NULL,
    Column4 varchar(50) NULL,
    Column5 int NULL,
    Column6 varchar(25) NULL,
    Column7 int NULL,
    Column8 int NULL,
    Column9 varchar(50) NULL,
    Column10 varchar(50) NULL,
    Column11 varchar(50) NULL,
    Column12 int NULL,
    RowNumber int NULL
    GO
    WITH cte as (
    SELECT
    DateKey ,
    VersionNumber ,
    SetID ,
    ClassID ,
    VariableName ,
    PeriodNumber ,
    PeriodData
    from StagingTable
    SELECT
    DateKey ,
    VersionNumber ,
    SetID ,
    ClassID ,
    VariableName,
    [0], [1], [2], [3], ,,,, [360]
    from cte
    pivot (SUM(PeriodData)
    FOR PeriodNumber IN (
    [0], [1], [2], [3], ..., [360]
    ) as pvt;
    CREATE UNIQUE NONCLUSTERED INDEX IX_StagingTable ON dbo.StagingTable
    DateKey,
    VersionNumber,
    SetId,
    ClassID,
    VariableName,
    PeriodNumber
    INCLUDE ([PeriodData])
    I have about 5 million rows in StageTable and the pivot query returns 32,000 rows.  It takes about 3 and a half minutes to run this query, whether I am outputting the results to the results window in SSMS or selecting into a new table.
    I checked the execution plan for this query (outputting to results window) and the only operation that takes any time is the non-clustered index scan (84% with Stream aggregate showing 14%).
    Here are the things I compared this to.  I ran a select from this table using just the columns in the index. The results returned in less than one minute and as expected the most expensive operation (100%) was the non-clustered index scan. 
    By the way, a select into returned almost immediately.
    If I take the pivot results (after a select into) and create a new table by select into, it takes almost no time for the query to finish.
    I did an estimated execution plan on these three queries (where PivotTable is a dump of the pivot query into a heap):
    WITH cte as (
    SELECT
    DateKey ,
    VersionNumber ,
    SetID ,
    ClassID ,
    VariableName ,
    PeriodNumber ,
    PeriodData
    from StagingTable
    SELECT
    DateKey ,
    VersionNumber ,
    SetID ,
    ClassID ,
    VariableName,
    [0], [1], [2], [3], ,,,, [360]
    from cte
    pivot (SUM(PeriodData)
    FOR PeriodNumber IN (
    [0], [1], [2], [3], ..., [360]
    ) as pvt;
    SELECT * from PivotTable;
    SELECT
    DateKey ,
    VersionNumber ,
    SetID ,
    ClassID ,
    VariableName ,
    PeriodNumber ,
    PeriodData
    from StagingTable;
    The first query (pivot query) had a cost of 41%, the second 25% (select pivottable) and the third 34% (select base table).  These are nowhere close to the ratios of the amount of time that it takes to run these queries (pivot query 3.5 minutes,
    select  PivotTable 5 seconds and select base table almost one minute).
    For the following:
    WITH cte as (
    SELECT
    DateKey ,
    VersionNumber ,
    SetID ,
    ClassID ,
    VariableName ,
    PeriodNumber ,
    PeriodData
    from StagingTable
    SELECT
    DateKey ,
    VersionNumber ,
    SetID ,
    ClassID ,
    VariableName,
    [0], [1], [2], [3], ,,,, [360]
    into newTable1
    from cte
    pivot (SUM(PeriodData)
    FOR PeriodNumber IN (
    [0], [1], [2], [3], ..., [360]
    ) as pvt;
    SELECT *
    into newTable2
    from PivotTable;
    SELECT
    DateKey ,
    VersionNumber ,
    SetID ,
    ClassID ,
    VariableName ,
    PeriodNumber ,
    PeriodData
    into newTable3
    from StagingTable;
    The distribution of query cost is strikingly different.  The pivot query has a cost of 98% and the other two queries have costs of 1%.  The big difference between these queries and the versions that just output the results (in the execution plan)
    is in the table insert.  The pivot query shows a cost of 26,000 while the select from pivottable shows cost of 160 and select from StagingTable shows cost of 280.
    What else can I look at?  Also, what else can I try to optimize the pivot query.
    For now, I am going to see if I get better performance letting SSRS do the pivoting.
    Russel Loski, MCT, MCSE Data Platform/Business Intelligence. Twitter: @sqlmovers; blog: www.sqlmovers.com

    I have finally nailed down what is causing the bottleneck.
    The Compute Scalar step for some reason shows almost no cost to the execution plan.  But I noticed that the actual number of rows is 5 million (the same as the scan).  It appears that SQL Server expands every row to 360+ columns, all 5 million
    of them.
    So I did an experiment.  I took the table that I was populating and did a cross join to a number table.  This table has 30 K rows and 360 columns.  I figured that if I select 150 rows from the number table it will generate around 5 million
    rows.  The results were almost identical to using the MAX(CASE WHEN ...) construct:  1 minute and some change.
    I then cross joined with only 75 rows.  It took 30 seconds.  37 rows took about 15 seconds.
    So the Compute Scalar costs a lot more then the Execution plan analyzer says.
    SSIS appears to gather one row at a time.  Once it finishes one row, one group by set, it sends the row on its way.  So, in my case, the 5 million rows is read in with 7 columns and 30 K rows are output with 365 columns or so.
    SQL Server creates 5 million rows with 365 columns, then aggregates them down to 30 K rows.
    Thank you, Tom for you discussion with me on this.  I think that I can present my thoughts to my lead.
    Russel Loski, MCT, MCSE Data Platform/Business Intelligence. Twitter: @sqlmovers; blog: www.sqlmovers.com

  • Installing Reporting Services in Sharepoint Integration Mode

    1) One WEF Server - WEFServer
    2) Sharepoint App Server - SPAPPServer
    3) SQL Database Server for cubes - SQLCubeServer; The Cube server has data from some external resources/data sources.
    4) SQL Database Server - SQLDEServer
    We want to install Reporting Services in Sharepoint Mode to generate Reports for SQLCubeServer Data.
    Please suggest what needs to be installed for Reporting Services and where?

    For performance purposes, SSRS should be installed on the WFE server.
    Trevor Seward
    Follow or contact me at...
    &nbsp&nbsp
    This post is my own opinion and does not necessarily reflect the opinion or view of Microsoft, its employees, or other MVPs.

  • It takes long time to load the parameter's value when running we run report

    Hi,
    It takes long time to load the parameter's value when running we run report. What could cause this? How to troubleshoot the behavior of the report? Could I use Profile and what events should i select?
    Thanks

    Hi jori5,
    Based on my understanding, after changing the parameter, the report render very slow, right?
    In Reporting Service, the total time to generate a report include TimeDataRetreval, TimeProcessing and TimeRendering. To analyze which section take much time, we can check the table Executionlog3 in the ReportServer database. For more information, please
    refer to this article:
    More tips to improve performance of SSRS reports.
    In your scenario, since you mention the query spends less time, the delay might happens during report processing and report rendering section. So you should check Executionlog3 to check which section costs most of time, then you can refer to this article
    to optimize your report:
    Troubleshooting Reports: Report Performance.
    If you have any question, please feel free to ask.
    Best regards,
    Qiuyun Yu

  • Aggregating Group Values Outside of group

    Hi, is this possible?
    Basically, I'm trying to show aggregates for a column, by group, on rows that are outside the scope of the group. I'm able to add the total for each group at the end of the group, but I want the totals for each groups at the end of the report instead.
    thanks!
    Leroy G. Brown

    Hi g2beastie,
    According to your description, the report is taking long time to render, right?
    In Reporting Services, the total time to generate a report include TimeDataRetreval, TimeProcessing and TimeRendering. To analyze which section take much time, we can check the table Executionlog3 in the ReportServer database. For more information, Please
    refer to this article:
    More tips to improve performance of SSRS reports.
    After check out which section costs most of time, then you can refer to this article to optimize your report:
    Troubleshooting Reports: Report Performance.
    If you have any question, please feel free to ask.
    Best regards,
    Qiuyun Yu
    Qiuyun Yu
    TechNet Community Support

  • SharePoint 2010 Server roles with 10 servers

    Hi, 
    Need some <g class="gr_ gr_24 gr-alert gr_gramm Punctuation only-ins replaceWithoutSep" data-gr-id="24" id="24">opinions</g> please. 
    I am configuring a script for a farm and are in 2 minds.
    4 of the 10 servers are going to be WFE Servers.
    So how do <g class="gr_ gr_26 gr-alert gr_tiny gr_spell ContextualSpelling multiReplace" data-gr-id="26" id="26">i</g> split the additional 6 <g class="gr_ gr_27 gr-alert gr_gramm Punctuation multiReplace"
    data-gr-id="27" id="27">Servers.</g>
    This is my thinking:
    2 x App Servers (MMS, UPS, State, Web Analytics, Usage and Health, Secure Store, BDC, Access Services, Visio, )
    1 x Search Servers (All Search Functions)
    2 x BI Servers (Excel Services, PowerPivot, Performance Point, SSRS(There is dedicated SSRS Servers but this for config parts)
    Then still have a Spare Server. Not interested in Web Apps. Thought of Second search server but search not huge priority.
    Lots of BI happening so maybe even splitting that to 3rd server? 
    Thanks for your input.

    With that many servers, you may want to look into the streamlined topology model. Ignore the stuff about Distributed Cache, but the other guidance should apply.
    Trevor Seward
    Follow or contact me at...
    &nbsp&nbsp
    This post is my own opinion and does not necessarily reflect the opinion or view of Microsoft, its employees, or other MVPs.

  • Strange performance issue in SSRS SharePoint integrated / Kerberos

    Hi,
    current setup / situation:
    Four server farm for a BI Portal:
    SQL Server instances
    SSAS instances
    SharePoint apps (SSRS, Central Admin ...)
    SharePoint frontend
    Three different environments (Dev, Test, Prod) with the same configuration (servers, versions, CPU/RAM,...)
    Kerberos properly configured (as far as we can see) pushing the current user credentials forward from the SharePoint frontend to the SSRS integrated service app to the SSAS OLAP cube.
    Problem:
    When we connect the report on dev to the dev cube, report execution time is about 7 seconds. In the execution log we can see in the additional info field, that we have a ConnectionOpenTime of a couple of milliseconds (~ 20-40).
    When we connect the report on test to the test cube OR to the dev cube OR the dev report to the test cube, we have runtimes of about 60 seconds with ConnectionOpenTime of a Little bit more than 2000 ms.
    When we change the data source connection to a fixed Windows account, the runtime drops down to about 7 seconds. When we switch back to "Use current user credentials" the runtime stays at the 7 seconds for about 1-2 hours, then in drops back to
    60 seconds.
    Question:
    What can cause this huge ConnectionOpenTime? Is it AD/DNS related? Claims To Windows Token Service? Any other caching/OS issue?
    Thanks for any input.
    KR
    Rainer
    Rainer

    Hi Rainer,
    The issue is little complex. I suggest that you could try to narrow down the issue deeper with below steps:
    1. Enable the verbose log on Sharepoint side.
    2. Capturing the SQL Server profiler trace on both test(slow) and dev(fast) environment.
    3. The same, RS exectionlog3 table
    Then reproduce the issue on both fast and slow environment, we need to compare both the Sharepoint ULS log and RS exection log to find out the slowness part.
    Could you please follow the below article for how to narrow down the issue with all logs?
    http://blogs.msdn.com/b/psssql/archive/2013/07/29/tracking-down-power-view-performance-problems.aspx
    Since you have found out the slowness is at ConnectionOpenTime , so we should focus on the Sharepoint frontend and SQL Server reporting service side. The ConnectionOpenTime should not reach the SSAS instance.
    Regards,
    Doris Ji

  • SSRS performance is too slow

    Hi,
    I am using SQL Server 2008 R2 SP1. This simple query, "SELECT CustomerID FROM Customer", returns 42900 records. When It is executed within SQL Server Management Studio (SSMS), it literally takes zero (0) second.  However, when this
    same query is executed within SQL Server Reporting Services (SSRS) to feed a parameter, it takes about two (2) minutes to execute. This same performance issue occurs when the report calls the stored procedure which serves as the main dataset for
    the report_ on SSMS the stored procedure takes under 3 seconds; on SSRS about 7 minutes. 
    Would you please help me Identify the source of the problem, and the possible solution?
    Thank you!

    Thank you all for your comments.
    Andrew,
    The "Executionlog3" view yields this info:
    <AdditionalInfo>
      <ProcessingEngine>2</ProcessingEngine>
      <ScalabilityTime>
        <Pagination>0</Pagination>
        <Processing>0</Processing>
      </ScalabilityTime>
      <EstimatedMemoryUsageKB>
        <Pagination>18</Pagination>
        <Processing>14807</Processing>
      </EstimatedMemoryUsageKB>
      <DataExtension>
        <SQL>1</SQL>
      </DataExtension>
    </AdditionalInfo>
    and
    TimeProcessing = 1768;  TimeRendering = 677; ByteCount = 88353
    The performance issue happens when the report is reading from SQL Server database, even for a simple query such as "SELECT DISTINCT CustomerID FROM Customer".  This exact same query takes literaly zero (0) second to fetch results when run
    directly within SQL Server Management Studio.
    Any other suggestions, please?
    Thank you!

  • SSRS Report queries begin running slowly, have to stop and start report server to restore performance

    We have had a production issue crop up twice now where reports begin running slowly seemingly at random.  
    When this happens we can see from running SQL Profiler that the report queries are taking an extremely long time to execute.  The same queries when run directly in management studio run quickly.  
    Initially I suspected parameter sniffing, and tried using OPTION (RECOMPILE) in the reports, as well as clearing out the particular query from the plan cache and running the SQL in SSMS to try and get a better plan etc but no amount of jiggery pokery by
    me could get the queries to run any faster.
    The really weird thing - is that stopping and starting the report server via the reporting services configuration manager instantly cures the problem.  
    I'd really love to know - why this might be?  Is it something to do with the report server closing and re-opening its connections to the database? That's the only sort of thing I can think of...any ideas? Anyone? Any suggestions would be much appreciated.
    LucasF

    Hi LucasF,
    In your scenario, usually we can monitor the execution log in Report Database. If you run below query, you can get the results how long the report takes to render (TimeRendering), how long to process the report(TimeProcessing) and how long to retrieve data
    from Database(TimeData). You can check the starttime and endtime to know the total time for executing a report.
    SELECT TOP1000 *FROM[ReportServer].[dbo].[ExecutionLog2]
    More details information, please reference to similar thread below:
    Steps for troubleshooting a slow SSRS 2014 server
    Troubleshooting Reports: Report Performance
    In SQL Server Reporting Services, a job will be created by SQL Server Agent if any of the following processes is underway:
    query execution on a remote or local database server
    report processing
    report rendering
    To cancel a job that is running on the report server, we can cancel the job directly or reduce the report execution time-out value in the SQL Server Management Studio and then will stop query execution. Please refer to the steps below:
    Open SQL Server Management Studio, and connect to "Reporting Services".
    Under the Report Server node, right-click on the "Jobs" folder and select "Refresh". Then, right-click on "Jobs" again and click "Cancel All Jobs".
    Right-click on the Report Server node and open the "Server Properties" dialog.
    Click the "Execution" option, and set the "Limit report execution to the following number of seconds:" to a much smaller number. After this issue is resolved, this configuration should revert to the previous state.  
    Reference:
    Managing a Running Process
    Setting Time-out Values for Report and Shared Dataset Processing
    In addition, we can also use the KILL Transact-SQL statement to terminate a normal connection by terminating the transactions that are associated with the specified session ID. For the details information, you can refer to:
    KILL (Transact-SQL)
    If you still have any problem, please feel free to ask.
    Regards,
    Vicky Liu
    Vicky Liu
    TechNet Community Support

Maybe you are looking for

  • What is a good macbook air compatible monitor around 250$?

    I can go up to 300.00$ but only want to spend 250.00$ And I don't like Dell monitors.

  • How do you view photos that are backed up on icloud

    How do I view photos that are on icloud on my personal computer

  • White Balance Plug In

    Can someone advise me on a plug in for a quick method of setting white balance when you did not get footage with correct white balance? Also can you set keyframes for changing the white balance in a multi-cam clip? This is the footage I am looking to

  • How to give subtypes to OM infotype.

    Hi all, I have created one OM infotype ,I need to give subtypes for that. How to give subtypes to OM infotypes thanks in advance Ambili b

  • Raptor Question

    Hi Everyone, As I mention in my earlier post on DVD spin noise, I've just upgraded to a MacPro 3ghz. I write music for a living and so I bought a Raptor 10,000 rpm drive (150 gigs). Frankly, I don't notice much of a difference at all in the speed fro